Also the US military is made up of civilians that have family members, and will not follow the orders of dictators as these individuals know it is "We the people" and not the government that call the shots. The brainwashing has to stop.
First off, not everyone in the military would comply with the government. Second, goat herders were putting up one hell of a fight in Afghanistan. Never underestimate people in their own back yards.
Almost no one would comply. That's an command that goes against the constitution, it's an unlawful command. You don't have to follow that, and I know many people that wouldn't.
Some soldiers sent against their own people would refuse but I fear most would comply. When ordered to serve in the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 only one British soldier refused to go and was court martialled.
And this has been the biggest communist turnaround we have seen in history in the last century. Venezuela went from one of the most prosperous nations in the world to bankrupt within a 10 year period.... I hope you are allowed to defend yourselves with the proper tools now, are you okay????!
Been in the Army for 7 years now, I have a wife and daughter. People actually think I’d betray my friends and family 💀 this is just a job, I’m not following unconstitutional orders.
Canada, and probably Canadians, have changed. There was a time when Americans admired both. Now, things have changed. With the accession of both Trudeaus, and the accompanying cultural changes, I would no longe step a foot into that lost land. How much you have lost.
i'm from scotland. part of the uk (unfortunately) and if it ever comes to the people having to stand up against the government. we have *0% chance* because of this very issue. some americans need to realize how lucky they are to have that amendment. they musn't let anyone try to remove it.
It truly is a privilege to be able to defend oneself physically, no matter the scenario. How many times in global history has the majority of a population had the privilege to be equipped to physically defend themselves?
As a Retired Military member the Military only have to follow LAWFUL & MORAL Orders. Another reason the Military wouldn't attack it's own Citizens is be our family and friends live in the Country
Technically members of the military are supposed to follow all lawful orders which may or may not have moral ambiguity (deployment of nuclear weapons for example). What constitutes a "lawful" order in wartime is actually more dynamic than many people realize. Even many military manuals acknowledge that it is often difficult to distinguish lawful orders from unlawful ones during wartime since soldiers following direction of their officers often don't have the necessary information to make such a distinction. The idea of "military necessity" is one concept in the Laws of War where there can be ambiguity that can be used as an excuse to commit what would usually be a war crime. Gray areas such as this during combat is the main reason that it is not outrageous to believe the US military can be used against its citizens, at least for a little bit. I would imagine that military leadership would eventually develop a more accurate conflict picture that would make them stop. Afterall, they swear an oath to defend the Constitution before following any orders from Congress (contrary to enlisted which swear to obey lawful orders from their superiors exclusively).
The only time that American soldiers had to fight other Americans (US civil war), 50k civilians were killed. That's more than civilians killed by Israel in Gaza, and in a time with no planes or modern tech and weapons.
@martinmcmartinezface4243 those weren't "American soldiers" those were Confederate and Union armies. The US military as explicitly outlined is not under any circumstance to be deployed on US soil.
@@martinmcmartinezface4243 I mean, if you have the mental capacity of a 6th grader I can see how you would draw that conclusion, but it doesn't make you any less wrong.
@@ThcreepyangelI don’t know whether it’ll be worse or not, but at least Hong Kong will be what it should be instead of China taking over us. For example Switzerland, people own gun there but the crime rate is low.
@@whynot9771I can’t speak on Hong Kong’s behalf, but for the last 4 years at least 170,000 to 200,000 people left. Bear in mind Hong Kong isn’t USA, we only got 7 million people and majority of those who left are children, young adult or the family as a whole.
@@lloydwaterloo9058as someone who grew up during this "war". Afghanistan didn't beat anyone at anything. They lost at every turn. If the mandate was to remove them the US military would have done that.
This woman speaking, she is a product of a broken spirit, one that has been broken to be ruled over and decisions made for her, "Freedoms/liberties are fought for, slavery/ servitude is a coward's way out of fighting."
Plus, some in the military will disobey their orders, and do what they have pledged to do, protect the people of their country from both foreign and in house threats. Also, numbers heavily on citizens side. Plus God...He can kick some ass when provoked.
1. Most of the rank in file military is conservative and likes the constitution. Not all would stay loyal to the tyrants 2. The Taliban were able to resist with comparatively very little and eventually won. 3. Look at the American Revolution 4. Bullies don’t like to bully those who can actually fight back. It’s a deterrent for things escalating to that point to begin with.
Re #1: boiled frogs and fascist states. You are correct, but even so that's not a sure thing to stop the military from ignoring the constitutional rights.
@ of course not, millions would die, it would be horrific. Boiled frog doesn’t apply, at least up to this point. Americans aren’t giving up their firearms though. They’ve tried in a couple of Leftist states and only a small minority cooperated and registered/turned in their “assault weapons”. Concealed carry/constitutional carry has spread throughout the country, not shrank.
@@Joe-hz1nw 1) "most of the military is conservative" *Opens social media* >Sailors sucking dildos on ship >Colonels running homosexual puppy parties >Emmas two moms >Juan just wants citizenship for abuela >Trans flags painted on bombs >Ship named after pdf file >Iraqi homosexual cia dungeons >Hasn't passed an audit in 80 years Very Christian, uber conservative.
@@Joe-hz1nw The boiled frog comment is only with regards to the the safeguard of patriots in the military refusing bad orders. There are a lot of cases where a gradual shift in "normal" has gotten subordinates to follow monsters order they never would have at the start.
The Taliban did not win really they survived and took revenge the USA managed to win so they bombed something in Germany if you want a better example look at Taiwan and then watch a not propaganda documentary millions died in unimaginable disgusting ways
Me. Think Australia, Canada, UK, and a lot of European countries. It's called gun control apparently for our own good. We would have to defend ourselves with toothpicks because carrying knives or any perceived weapon is a chargeable offence unless you are one of the special people. Hurty words are dangerous too.
Go try to purchase an F-16, a Howitzer cannon, or a military bomb or missile. The answer is "NO". Civilians are prohibited from purchasing military weapons.
First, she doesn't realize that many of our service members are true patriots, not just "yes men" who just follow orders mindlessly. But, the biggest fault in her logic is not realizing the power of numbers. 1000 farmers with pitch forks beat 100 soldiers with swords, bows, and full armor. 300m armed civilians could easily beat any military force in the world.
This is why for the last 4 years + the government has tried to defund the police and reform the US military. Their goal is 100% to take away any and all power from the American people.
All military members take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, that oath supersedes ANY order given by a politician or governance. If any President was insane enough to give an Executive order seizing all privately owned weapons i very much doubt the military as a whole would comply.
Chalice k, you're 💯 right . My family lives under vietcong and we don't have freedom . People who hate America country should move to the country my family's lives in. America country is the best country in the world's. Usa MAGA 🇺🇸
“To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.” -Adolph Hitler Do you really need to know anything else!? History already played this out for us. Learn the history, or be doomed to repeat it. Like, we’ve seen this one before, y’all!! 🤦🏻♀️
It would be unlawful for the US military to collect civilian’s fire arms even if they were ordered to. A lot of soldiers would be like there is no way I’m going to bully bob’s house to get his fire arms.
And since the majority of people in the armed forces are not officers or especially generals/admirals where do you think they're from.🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇸
What about all the countries that don't have guns and haven't been taken over? And also don't have multiple school shootings every year? I live in the UK and this argument is absolute lunacy to me
Yeah but how many stabbings do you have a year? Acid attacks? And wait are you even allowed to comment on RUclips without a license? Don't go to jail for wrongthink, Winston!
@@ollie5271 how ya doing with all those stabbings yall have? Do you REALLY think not having guns is gonna keep a bad guy from not doing bad things? Honestly? Dumbest argument ever. China has no guns and school stabbings are through the roof! Mass slaughters. Look it up. And yes, while we do have school shootings, the media has made them look FAR greater than they actually are. Deaths attributed to school shootings: less than 350 a year. Deaths attributed to drunk driving: more than 40,000 a year. Does this mean we should ban cars and booze? Hmmm? I would be happy to look up UK crime rate and mass casualty situations to push my point home. I would NEVER want to live in the UK....especially now that they are arresting people for ludacris things like not using someones "proper pronouns" online. LAUGHABLE! I was rolling when I heard that goof of an officer of yours "demand extradition" for a US citizen offending a UK law online. Really? How dense can your "leaders" be!? Do you HONESTLY think the US would comply with such an OUTRAGEOUS request!? 🤣 It was worth a good laugh! Dont go pointing fingers at us when youre rotting from the inside out. Its not our fault you refuse to accept it.
Your peace in the UK and Europe as a whole is fragile at best. Your gun crime still exists but is outshined but other crime like SA and knife crimes. And who's going to care about schools if daddy government decides to come down on its own population? Plus what happens in our schools is blown way out of proportion by the government. It's terrible it happens at all and I would love to wave a magic wand and make them go away, but that's not the reality we live in. I'd rather take my chances in the hoods of America then visit anywhere in Europe, at least I'd be armed and have a right to fight back. I guess look at it as "going down swinging" or "I'd rather die on my feet then on my back" if that helps you wrap your mind around it. I love my cousins accross the pond and I don't want to sound like I'm bashing you guys. We just have a different way of thinking.
US only became independent through gun ownership. It was the militias that began the revolution. Yes, it was supported by military (both foreign and domestic) but without the guns, the revolution would never have started. Similarly the Vietnamese beat you and and the French with an army of armed citizens. Similarly in Cuba. The Mujahedeen in Afghanistan defeated the Soviets etc etc. Also, if it came down to it, do you really believe the average US military serviceman would side with the govt against their own people? As we regularly see in coups all around the world, the military often switch allegiance quite quickly. Look at Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan recently.
The U.S. military is my son, my brother, my cousin ... and that other soldier is my neighbors son, etc, etc And then there is the less known secondary oath that many in the military take.
Oh stop. Talking through things with other people is a good thing. Now she's at the next step of presenting those ideas to someone else (Charlie) for feedback. This is literally why we have dialogue.
@@stevensmoley7983There would be ppl in the military that didn't go along with the order to go against the very ppl they are defending first of all. Second, we had all that against Vietnam and Afghanistan and they were messing us up in their own backyard. The American ppl would win. Don't doubt that
@stevensmoley7983 There would be ppl in the military that didn't go along with the order to go against the very ppl they are defending first of all. Second, we had all that against Vietnam and Afghanistan and they were messing us up in their own backyard. The American ppl would win. Don't doubt that
Anything you said only gonna be mobilized in an all out war. They not gonna nuke their own territories just for win, unless needed. Its will destroy the land its self.@@stevensmoley7983
@youngswoll3 I mean Vietname did a pretty good job against a powerful military like the US who had tanks and helicopters while the Vietnamese were using terrible weaponry and weren't experienced or trained.
It would be an unlawful order to use military force against the U.S. citizens. And furthermore, it would be our duty to assist in reestablishing a government of, for, and by the people.
One thing to realize is that the people serving in our military are US citizens, not slaves to the government. As mentioned in other comments, they are brother, sisters, sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, and cousins. Not to mention the bond between vets and the military. AND, EVERY PERSON SERVING IN OUR MILITARY HAS THE RIGHT AND RESPONSIBLY TO DISOBEY ANY ORDER THEY ARE GIVEN FROM HIGHER UP THE CHAIN OF COMMAND IF THAT ORDER IS UNLAWFUL OR VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION. And every person who is serving or has served has sworn to protect and support the constitution. Being discharged does not end that vow. Only death releases us from that promise.
@@punishedmatteson7108 "the Nazis weren't fighting inside Germany, though", I'd fact check that if I were you.. The Nazi's definitely imprisoned Germans with opposing religious and political beliefs.. "and as far as the camps they didn't view the prisoners as Germans either." I'm not sure what this is saying. Does this mean that the Jewish Germans who were imprisoned weren't seen as German because of their political and religious beliefs? The same could be said for any modern oppression/dictatorship..
Consider this, many, many, old salt individuals, veterans, MEN & WOMEN! In the shadows, still aware of their training and took it HOME. Caution if not used by those in power, will surely be embarrassed by, "PATRIOTS OF FREEDOM, VETERANS, CHILDREN OF VETERANS, GRANDCHILDREN, AMERICANS ARE UNIQUE. WE HAVE AWAKENED!!!
I'm a better soldier now than when I was on active duty. We both know they'd never even try, but if they did, they'd regret it and never make it past the first house they tried it on haha
“Cavemen” in Afghanistan would beg to differ. Fought them for 20 years only to be in power again. Not to mention if we had a civil war in this country, the military industrial complex would have a hard time building bombs if they’re being shot at nor would the employees go to work. On top of that, a bunch of military personnel would not go along with those orders.
Not really much of a need to say "She isn't bad looking" on a political video, kind of weird imo. Are you a conservative by chance? I'm a centrist myself
Don’t forget air strikes too. Oh and missiles. Oops forgot about grenades. Your AR-15 is cute but it ain’t no match for the firepower the government has John.
The U.S. military consists of 2.8 million people in its entirety. That includes reserves and civilians being contracted. A small percentage of that is combat jobs, so the actual people in the military who can fight is NO WHERE near 2.8 million. The number of gun owners in America is well over 100 million. It wouldnt even be a fight, because the military would NEVER attempt it. They couldnt beat Afghanistan, but this girl thinks the military could beat America 😂🤣
Look at how confident you are- now tell me, when they decide to use tanks, missiles, grenades and air strikes instead of using guns, who wins now? Try to think before speaking next time sweetheart
@@youngswoll3 you mean how they lost a 20 year war (having all of those things) fighting a bunch of dudes in sandals with old AK-47's? 😂😂 Try to think before TYPING next time sweetheart 😘♥️
From what I can tell, his work on campuses has emboldened a lot of students who would otherwise be quiet to express conservative views and concerns. It's not just him getting yelled at by leftists. This is how I remember college being. Everyone wasn't a leftist. The conservatives just tended to be quiet.
Most Military has Family living within the population. Same with Policing Agencies. How supportive of the Gov't would they be, if they were informed where those people live was Bombed by Aircraft? 2. By Law, "Elected Representatives" Are REQUIRED to live among Their Constituents! Their Addresses Are Public Record.
Yeah we would, and “you’d be surprised” are awesome responses to this ignorant comment. Those that are in the military know, they won’t stand a chance against their families at home even with the military equipment. Not only that and is certainly not true for everyone but for the truly badass folks in military that could decimate their families using military equipment, most likely won’t follow those orders. Why kill those you swore to protect? It doesn’t work that way. It just doesn’t.
And that is what King George III tried to do to the American Colonists and is one of the reasons we have 2A. And why 2A does not specify what weapons we are allowed to have. The founding fathers knew history and the history of weapons. They KNEW weapons would be improved and new ones made. And to keep gov. honest we had to be able to own anything they had.
The citizens of America should be able to possess the exact same arms as the military and the police and to argue otherwise is to argue in favor of the government holding a monopoly on power over the people which is absolutely antithetical to the design of the founders and to our constitution. The second amendment was put into the bill of rights to ensure citizens the means to overthrow a tyrannical government, not to deer hunt, which logically implies that the government should never be better armed than the people. To the people that think only the government should have “assault type weapons,” the police and military were never meant to be armed more heavily or efficiently than the citizens. This would defeat the whole purpose of the clause.
What people don’t get is the US military are US citizens from the local community. If the “government” actually tried stuff. Lots would leave and defend their communities.
What you don't get is that we've been held under a fire hose of brown world immigration. There's spanish only national guard units lol. Pay attention to South Africa, that's our future
Vietnam, Afghanistan (twice), and the American Revolution… and they don’t think an armed civilian populace can stand up to the most powerful militaries and weapons on the planet. LMFAO
Afghanistan sind survive and revenge they did not win the rest gave up because they had no enemy they could fight Vietnam look a not propaganda documentary and tell me that's a kind of victory you want
I became and American citizen for twenty years now 🇺🇸🙏 I survived the Pol Pot, Khmer Rouge in the 70’ ( Cambodia in communist regime.) Charlie is correct. Pot Ppot did just that and it resulted in almost 3 millions Cambodians massacred, killed by their own communist government. Please, protect our second amendment right🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@@robertarmstrong9166 US civilian gun owners easily number in the tens of millions. The current head count of the US military stands at 2.5 million. It wouldnt be a fair fight. Besides, when Brandon tossed out that clear threat against the US people (his BOSSES) I dont think he realized that he needed soldiers to run those "tanks and jets". Unfortunately for him, an order to take over the US by force would end with most military personell flipping him the bird and taking over all the bases for OUR use against him. Oops. He CLEARLY did think that threat through.
Another relevant point right now is that in my news feed this week, twice I have come across reports that all of the US armed services are currently sitting a little below quota for ready for active duty members. This implies increased vulnerability.
🟡. So here in Michigan i am charged with MCL 750.227 in which i will be imprisoned for a 5 year felony by exercising a God Given Inalienable right to the Second Amendment concealed or open carry within the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution. It Shall Not Be Infringed upon allowed from the government by permission as a privilege by the issuance of a license or a permit. This action is converting the exercise of a God Given Inalienable right into committing a crime by the enforcement of an unconstitutional enacted racist Jim Crow law in Michigan in 1927 expanded in 1931 after the Dr Ossian Sweet incident in 1925 Detroit, Michigan. With writing of State of Michigan Constitution in 1957 and ratification in 1963 contained the following language in Article I, Clause 6 " Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state. " complied with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither the Second Amendment nor Article I, Clause 6 contain any prohibitions to the manner in which to exercise the God Given Inalienable right to keep and bear arms either concealed or open carry. Furthermore Article VI, Clause 2 prevents any laws enacted that are contrary and repugnant to the United States Constitution are null and void of enforcement as law. As far as states rights are concerned within the Tenth Amendment a state may grant more rights and privileges to we the people that the United States Constitution does not provide for but they may not restrict or ever take away any rights as provided for by the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, or the United States Constitution. What country is Michigan or any other state located in ? Is Michigan or any other state located in America ? We The People have the God Given Inalienable rights to the Second Amendment concealed or open carry within the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution. It is the preemption law of the land by the Supremacy Clause, Article 6 Clause 2 is very clear that no law can be contrary to the United States Constitution. It Shall Not Be Infringed upon allowed from any level of government by permission as a privilege granted by an issued license or an issued permit. As far as states rights are concerned within the Tenth Amendment allows for the states may grant more rights and more privileges to we the people than the United States Constitution or federal law does not provide for but they may not restrict or ever take away any rights as provided for by the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, or the United States Constitution. The claim of " in the interest of public safety or an officer's safety " does not negate the exercising of the Second Amendment by feeling or emotions. Does a person ask the government for permission each time that they exercise God Given Inalienable rights as a privilege by a license or a permit ? What about saying a prayer or going to assemble at a church or the press printing a newspaper or an article ? So why does that apply the Second Amendment preemption ? 🤔
She's assuming everyone in the military would be loyal to the government and turn on their friends, families, and neighbors.
And we would not.
You would be surprised...
That's why so many U.N. troops are in the USA right now!
Soldiers tend to follow orders.
Also the US military is made up of civilians that have family members, and will not follow the orders of dictators as these individuals know it is "We the people" and not the government that call the shots. The brainwashing has to stop.
First off, not everyone in the military would comply with the government. Second, goat herders were putting up one hell of a fight in Afghanistan. Never underestimate people in their own back yards.
No, not EVERYONE (There are prisons).
@@warrenjones1936 current U.S population count as of 2023 is 335 million. Ya sorry but we don’t have enough jails to lock that many people up.
Almost no one would comply. That's an command that goes against the constitution, it's an unlawful command. You don't have to follow that, and I know many people that wouldn't.
Some soldiers sent against their own people would refuse but I fear most would comply. When ordered to serve in the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 only one British soldier refused to go and was court martialled.
@ “illegal invasion” lmao 🤓🫵
They did that to us in Venezuela! The first thing they did!!!
And this has been the biggest communist turnaround we have seen in history in the last century. Venezuela went from one of the most prosperous nations in the world to bankrupt within a 10 year period....
I hope you are allowed to defend yourselves with the proper tools now, are you okay????!
EXACTLY. It baffles me how we have many recent examples and still people are so naive
They did it in Russia as well, and after that the Communists seized control of Russia and her neighbors.
Im sorry that happened to you.
thats so based of them, love venezula
How many military members would be on our side? ALOT!
Don't forget the retired members also. 20 million plus.
Been in the Army for 7 years now, I have a wife and daughter. People actually think I’d betray my friends and family 💀 this is just a job, I’m not following unconstitutional orders.
@@Gunzavage 🫡
I am not willing to take that chance.
@@Gunzavage exactly its like they think we are mindless drones lol
He's right. Take it from a canadian.
Absolutely not, he has no idea about history
I agree (also from Canada)
@@fischersfritz468so, disarm yourself because you won't win? I'm confused
We'll take it from Canada when we want it just kidding
Canada, and probably Canadians, have changed. There was a time when Americans admired both. Now, things have changed. With the accession of both Trudeaus, and the accompanying cultural changes, I would no longe step a foot into that lost land. How much you have lost.
i'm from scotland. part of the uk (unfortunately) and if it ever comes to the people having to stand up against the government. we have *0% chance* because of this very issue.
some americans need to realize how lucky they are to have that amendment. they musn't let anyone try to remove it.
It truly is a privilege to be able to defend oneself physically, no matter the scenario. How many times in global history has the majority of a population had the privilege to be equipped to physically defend themselves?
You can gladly have Scotland back and see how far you’d get without the billions in subsidy’s you receive from England.
In 1707, during the reign of Queen Anne, Scotland and England were united as one country.
@@jamess6961 I'm in the US and we want our money back for bailing out your healthcare system repeatedly.
@
😂😂😂 don’t know where you get your information from, but it’s wrong 🤦🏻♂️
The guy right behind her to the left, "Yeah, we would." Love it!
As a Retired Military member the Military only have to follow LAWFUL & MORAL Orders. Another reason the Military wouldn't attack it's own Citizens is be our family and friends live in the Country
Technically members of the military are supposed to follow all lawful orders which may or may not have moral ambiguity (deployment of nuclear weapons for example). What constitutes a "lawful" order in wartime is actually more dynamic than many people realize.
Even many military manuals acknowledge that it is often difficult to distinguish lawful orders from unlawful ones during wartime since soldiers following direction of their officers often don't have the necessary information to make such a distinction. The idea of "military necessity" is one concept in the Laws of War where there can be ambiguity that can be used as an excuse to commit what would usually be a war crime.
Gray areas such as this during combat is the main reason that it is not outrageous to believe the US military can be used against its citizens, at least for a little bit. I would imagine that military leadership would eventually develop a more accurate conflict picture that would make them stop. Afterall, they swear an oath to defend the Constitution before following any orders from Congress (contrary to enlisted which swear to obey lawful orders from their superiors exclusively).
The only time that American soldiers had to fight other Americans (US civil war), 50k civilians were killed. That's more than civilians killed by Israel in Gaza, and in a time with no planes or modern tech and weapons.
@martinmcmartinezface4243 those weren't "American soldiers" those were Confederate and Union armies.
The US military as explicitly outlined is not under any circumstance to be deployed on US soil.
@anonymousNine they were soldiers, and they were from America. I think that qualifies to be called American soldiers.
@@martinmcmartinezface4243 I mean, if you have the mental capacity of a 6th grader I can see how you would draw that conclusion, but it doesn't make you any less wrong.
Look at Canada's dictator
Look at what the Australian Government has done to the people since they took the guns.
We have had 30 years of tyranny
dictators are not elected...
Soon to be Wayne Gretzky...
@@lawrencejoy2256 thats so embarrassing you think that
unfortunately the next guy in line is even worse
In my opinion our military wouldn’t unjustly stand against its citizens if there was an upraising.
I’m from Hong Kong, I can say this confirmedly.
If we were having guns, we’d take back control decades ago.
Unfortunately we don’t, stay strong USA 🇺🇸
you want to live in a worse city
No you wouldn't
I love HongKong and the people. Will keep praying for you.
@@ThcreepyangelI don’t know whether it’ll be worse or not, but at least Hong Kong will be what it should be instead of China taking over us. For example Switzerland, people own gun there but the crime rate is low.
@@whynot9771I can’t speak on Hong Kong’s behalf, but for the last 4 years at least 170,000 to 200,000 people left. Bear in mind Hong Kong isn’t USA, we only got 7 million people and majority of those who left are children, young adult or the family as a whole.
Yap, I know that story long time ago. The first thing a dictator will do is take away people's guns.😮
3/4 of the US Military would fight on the people's side!!!
Yes
I hope soo 😊
😂 riiiight
It's true 🤣 @@rectorkirk1158
Rubbish!
The first thing I think about is the Vietnam war. They had AK-47’s and sandals and were a very formidable adversary.
And if the US military had needed to operate from a logistics chain 100% run by those same Vietnamese, it would have been over even sooner.
What about Afghanistan as a more recent example of how armed population, even if it's poorly armed, can beat the US.
@@lloydwaterloo9058as someone who grew up during this "war". Afghanistan didn't beat anyone at anything. They lost at every turn. If the mandate was to remove them the US military would have done that.
They beat us
They beat us
Charlie Kirk is Always right!!
This woman speaking, she is a product of a broken spirit, one that has been broken to be ruled over and decisions made for her, "Freedoms/liberties are fought for, slavery/ servitude is a coward's way out of fighting."
Plus, some in the military will disobey their orders, and do what they have pledged to do, protect the people of their country from both foreign and in house threats. Also, numbers heavily on citizens side. Plus God...He can kick some ass when provoked.
She’s gorgeous
1. Most of the rank in file military is conservative and likes the constitution. Not all would stay loyal to the tyrants
2. The Taliban were able to resist with comparatively very little and eventually won.
3. Look at the American Revolution
4. Bullies don’t like to bully those who can actually fight back. It’s a deterrent for things escalating to that point to begin with.
Re #1: boiled frogs and fascist states. You are correct, but even so that's not a sure thing to stop the military from ignoring the constitutional rights.
@ of course not, millions would die, it would be horrific.
Boiled frog doesn’t apply, at least up to this point. Americans aren’t giving up their firearms though. They’ve tried in a couple of Leftist states and only a small minority cooperated and registered/turned in their “assault weapons”. Concealed carry/constitutional carry has spread throughout the country, not shrank.
@@Joe-hz1nw 1) "most of the military is conservative"
*Opens social media*
>Sailors sucking dildos on ship
>Colonels running homosexual puppy parties
>Emmas two moms
>Juan just wants citizenship for abuela
>Trans flags painted on bombs
>Ship named after pdf file
>Iraqi homosexual cia dungeons
>Hasn't passed an audit in 80 years
Very Christian, uber conservative.
@@Joe-hz1nw The boiled frog comment is only with regards to the the safeguard of patriots in the military refusing bad orders. There are a lot of cases where a gradual shift in "normal" has gotten subordinates to follow monsters order they never would have at the start.
The Taliban did not win really they survived and took revenge the USA managed to win so they bombed something in Germany if you want a better example look at Taiwan and then watch a not propaganda documentary millions died in unimaginable disgusting ways
"Take my guns, take my freedom." Who's familiar with this line??
Me. Think Australia, Canada, UK, and a lot of European countries. It's called gun control apparently for our own good. We would have to defend ourselves with toothpicks because carrying knives or any perceived weapon is a chargeable offence unless you are one of the special people. Hurty words are dangerous too.
@@marykefletcher2667 I mean for that we have have 1 school shooting in a couple of years while the USA has a couple the year ...
Are you allowed to own biological and chemical weapons? You know, only for self defence
The government has no authority to make any laws or regulations against arms per the Constitution of the United States!
Go try to purchase an F-16, a Howitzer cannon, or a military bomb or missile. The answer is "NO". Civilians are prohibited from purchasing military weapons.
You could amend your constitution?
@@AlanRumble-im7ok Look at history. We aint changing it for good reasons.
oh man the irony
@@AlanRumble-im7ok, why would we want to do that?
First, she doesn't realize that many of our service members are true patriots, not just "yes men" who just follow orders mindlessly. But, the biggest fault in her logic is not realizing the power of numbers. 1000 farmers with pitch forks beat 100 soldiers with swords, bows, and full armor. 300m armed civilians could easily beat any military force in the world.
This is why for the last 4 years + the government has tried to defund the police and reform the US military. Their goal is 100% to take away any and all power from the American people.
All military members take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, that oath supersedes ANY order given by a politician or governance. If any President was insane enough to give an Executive order seizing all privately owned weapons i very much doubt the military as a whole would comply.
Its not just the guns either. There's a couple million combat veterans in the population now too.
DAMN RIGHT!
Jesus loves you and died and rose so you could live forever 💗 repent and turn to Him, He will take you back no matter what (Luke 15:1-32)
Sounds like wasps against a bug bomb. Like bringing guns to a drone fight. 😮😮
Drones can be taken down quite easily…..without projectiles
Thanks Charlie for your insight.
The US military would not carry out the governments wishes. Not as it stands now.
Yes they would 100% only human
Chalice k, you're 💯 right . My family lives under vietcong and we don't have freedom . People who hate America country should move to the country my family's lives in. America country is the best country in the world's. Usa MAGA 🇺🇸
“To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.” -Adolph Hitler
Do you really need to know anything else!? History already played this out for us. Learn the history, or be doomed to repeat it.
Like, we’ve seen this one before, y’all!! 🤦🏻♀️
Great response!
It would be unlawful for the US military to collect civilian’s fire arms even if they were ordered to. A lot of soldiers would be like there is no way I’m going to bully bob’s house to get his fire arms.
Tread around and find out! They know better than that, haha! They are here to defend us, not unarm us ❤
One of the few young people asking this kind of question while being non combative and rude. Maybe the tide is changing.
Beautiful smart young lady
What did she do that showed she was smart? Ask a question?
Not smart at all
And since the majority of people in the armed forces are not officers or especially generals/admirals where do you think they're from.🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇸🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇸
What about all the countries that don't have guns and haven't been taken over? And also don't have multiple school shootings every year? I live in the UK and this argument is absolute lunacy to me
Yeah but how many stabbings do you have a year? Acid attacks? And wait are you even allowed to comment on RUclips without a license? Don't go to jail for wrongthink, Winston!
It's not guns. I'll say that much.
@@ollie5271 how ya doing with all those stabbings yall have? Do you REALLY think not having guns is gonna keep a bad guy from not doing bad things? Honestly? Dumbest argument ever. China has no guns and school stabbings are through the roof! Mass slaughters. Look it up.
And yes, while we do have school shootings, the media has made them look FAR greater than they actually are. Deaths attributed to school shootings: less than 350 a year. Deaths attributed to drunk driving: more than 40,000 a year. Does this mean we should ban cars and booze? Hmmm?
I would be happy to look up UK crime rate and mass casualty situations to push my point home. I would NEVER want to live in the UK....especially now that they are arresting people for ludacris things like not using someones "proper pronouns" online. LAUGHABLE! I was rolling when I heard that goof of an officer of yours "demand extradition" for a US citizen offending a UK law online. Really? How dense can your "leaders" be!? Do you HONESTLY think the US would comply with such an OUTRAGEOUS request!? 🤣 It was worth a good laugh!
Dont go pointing fingers at us when youre rotting from the inside out. Its not our fault you refuse to accept it.
Don't you need to ask the king for permission to cut your steak?
Your peace in the UK and Europe as a whole is fragile at best. Your gun crime still exists but is outshined but other crime like SA and knife crimes. And who's going to care about schools if daddy government decides to come down on its own population? Plus what happens in our schools is blown way out of proportion by the government. It's terrible it happens at all and I would love to wave a magic wand and make them go away, but that's not the reality we live in. I'd rather take my chances in the hoods of America then visit anywhere in Europe, at least I'd be armed and have a right to fight back. I guess look at it as "going down swinging" or "I'd rather die on my feet then on my back" if that helps you wrap your mind around it. I love my cousins accross the pond and I don't want to sound like I'm bashing you guys. We just have a different way of thinking.
US only became independent through gun ownership. It was the militias that began the revolution. Yes, it was supported by military (both foreign and domestic) but without the guns, the revolution would never have started. Similarly the Vietnamese beat you and and the French with an army of armed citizens. Similarly in Cuba. The Mujahedeen in Afghanistan defeated the Soviets etc etc. Also, if it came down to it, do you really believe the average US military serviceman would side with the govt against their own people? As we regularly see in coups all around the world, the military often switch allegiance quite quickly. Look at Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan recently.
Unless you can defend something you possess it only by sufference.
Thank you for this. Xclnt job Professor Charlie Kirk.
The U.S. military is my son, my brother, my cousin ... and that other soldier is my neighbors son, etc, etc And then there is the less known secondary oath that many in the military take.
❤ 💯 the 2nd oath supercedes the 1st!
Great idea going to their Indoctrination centers!
(i.e any college campus.)
DAVID AND GOLIATH
"Me and my friends were talking about something none of us have any knowledge of or experience in and we all think you're wrong. "
Oh stop. Talking through things with other people is a good thing. Now she's at the next step of presenting those ideas to someone else (Charlie) for feedback. This is literally why we have dialogue.
How do you know they don't have any knowledge...
@@mariolukas584because they're clearly wanting to surrender
She doesn't know Texans. Have a lot more than single shot guns 😂
And a lot more than a single gun per person!
How about tanks, air bombers and nuclear weapons?
@@stevensmoley7983There would be ppl in the military that didn't go along with the order to go against the very ppl they are defending first of all. Second, we had all that against Vietnam and Afghanistan and they were messing us up in their own backyard. The American ppl would win. Don't doubt that
@stevensmoley7983 There would be ppl in the military that didn't go along with the order to go against the very ppl they are defending first of all. Second, we had all that against Vietnam and Afghanistan and they were messing us up in their own backyard. The American ppl would win. Don't doubt that
Anything you said only gonna be mobilized in an all out war. They not gonna nuke their own territories just for win, unless needed. Its will destroy the land its self.@@stevensmoley7983
So is she asking that we need more than guns or saying the government is so powerful that we shouldn't try and fight back and be slaves ?
I believe she was going with the 2nd option lol
Obviously the latter- it’s adorable that Americans think their little AR-15 would stand a chance against tanks, drone strikes and missiles
@@youngswoll3Afghanistan? Vietnam? Yeah we'd be okay with our 400million guns.
@youngswoll3 I mean Vietname did a pretty good job against a powerful military like the US who had tanks and helicopters while the Vietnamese were using terrible weaponry and weren't experienced or trained.
@@youngswoll3Tell that to the Taliban and the Viet Cong. The great American military lost those wars.
Omylanta she was so respectful! Good for her having a conversation!
It would be an unlawful order to use military force against the U.S. citizens. And furthermore, it would be our duty to assist in reestablishing a government of, for, and by the people.
One thing to realize is that the people serving in our military are US citizens, not slaves to the government. As mentioned in other comments, they are brother, sisters, sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, and cousins. Not to mention the bond between vets and the military. AND, EVERY PERSON SERVING IN OUR MILITARY HAS THE RIGHT AND RESPONSIBLY TO DISOBEY ANY ORDER THEY ARE GIVEN FROM HIGHER UP THE CHAIN OF COMMAND IF THAT ORDER IS UNLAWFUL OR VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION. And every person who is serving or has served has sworn to protect and support the constitution. Being discharged does not end that vow. Only death releases us from that promise.
Yeah the same can be said about the German Nazi's in WW2 so I'm not really sure if this would hold up man
@@xNinj4xHD I doubt you know anything about ww2 or nazi germany, outside of Hollywood propaganda
@@xNinj4xHDthe Nazis weren't fighting inside Germany, though, and as far as the camps they didn't view the prisoners as Germans either.
@@punishedmatteson7108 "the Nazis weren't fighting inside Germany, though",
I'd fact check that if I were you.. The Nazi's definitely imprisoned Germans with opposing religious and political beliefs..
"and as far as the camps they didn't view the prisoners as Germans either."
I'm not sure what this is saying. Does this mean that the Jewish Germans who were imprisoned weren't seen as German because of their political and religious beliefs? The same could be said for any modern oppression/dictatorship..
Consider this, many, many, old salt individuals, veterans, MEN & WOMEN! In the shadows, still aware of their training and took it HOME. Caution if not used by those in power, will surely be embarrassed by, "PATRIOTS OF FREEDOM, VETERANS, CHILDREN OF VETERANS, GRANDCHILDREN, AMERICANS ARE UNIQUE. WE HAVE AWAKENED!!!
I'm a better soldier now than when I was on active duty. We both know they'd never even try, but if they did, they'd regret it and never make it past the first house they tried it on haha
Facts!
“Cavemen” in Afghanistan would beg to differ. Fought them for 20 years only to be in power again. Not to mention if we had a civil war in this country, the military industrial complex would have a hard time building bombs if they’re being shot at nor would the employees go to work. On top of that, a bunch of military personnel would not go along with those orders.
100% agreed
Ty for speaking 100% TRUTH Once again!
Agreed
She clearly didn't pay attention to Afghanistan.
At least she was civil to Charlie. She isnt bad looking either.
Simp
She didn't look lib.
Not really much of a need to say "She isn't bad looking" on a political video, kind of weird imo. Are you a conservative by chance? I'm a centrist myself
@@xNinj4xHDIm anti centrist.
Exactly Charlies, Brains and beauty
They might have tanks but they have to xome out of it sooner or later......
Don’t forget air strikes too. Oh and missiles. Oops forgot about grenades. Your AR-15 is cute but it ain’t no match for the firepower the government has John.
@@youngswoll3 you mean all the things that lost the longest war in American history? 👀👀👀
@@youngswoll3 again, you mean the things the US used in Afghanistan, and lost the war after 20 years 😘
Sweetheart ♥️
You do you I'll do me
Wow. Thank you, young lady. Polite and intelligent.
Why are you so scared of guns. You should be scared of their guns.
Typical American reasonable girl 🗿🗿🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅
The U.S. military consists of 2.8 million people in its entirety. That includes reserves and civilians being contracted. A small percentage of that is combat jobs, so the actual people in the military who can fight is NO WHERE near 2.8 million.
The number of gun owners in America is well over 100 million.
It wouldnt even be a fight, because the military would NEVER attempt it. They couldnt beat Afghanistan, but this girl thinks the military could beat America 😂🤣
I have never thought of it that way but damn you are right and I will use this for the rest of my life.
Drones and unmanned vehicles exist, but you're right.
Look at how confident you are- now tell me, when they decide to use tanks, missiles, grenades and air strikes instead of using guns, who wins now? Try to think before speaking next time sweetheart
@@youngswoll3 you mean how they lost a 20 year war (having all of those things) fighting a bunch of dudes in sandals with old AK-47's? 😂😂
Try to think before TYPING next time sweetheart 😘♥️
@@youngswoll3 btw, I fought in Afghanistan, so I actually know what I'm talking about
Sweetheart ♥️
I agree.Nice to be able to defend yourself❤❤❤❤
Thank you for enlightening this young lady and her freinds!!!❤😂
From what I can tell, his work on campuses has emboldened a lot of students who would otherwise be quiet to express conservative views and concerns. It's not just him getting yelled at by leftists. This is how I remember college being. Everyone wasn't a leftist. The conservatives just tended to be quiet.
The military also took an oath to uphold the us constitution not a corrupt government
OMG
She's gorgeous 😍 !
Civilian firearms outnumber law enforcement and military two times over
THANK GOD for our forefathers foresight in our American Constitution Rights!
I appreciate everyone from turning point… going out to these indoctrination farms, I mean colleges…
Most Military has Family living within the population. Same with Policing Agencies. How supportive of the Gov't would they be, if they were informed where those people live was Bombed by Aircraft? 2. By Law, "Elected Representatives" Are REQUIRED to live among Their Constituents! Their Addresses Are Public Record.
Yup … support the Second !!!
Yeah we would, and “you’d be surprised” are awesome responses to this ignorant comment. Those that are in the military know, they won’t stand a chance against their families at home even with the military equipment. Not only that and is certainly not true for everyone but for the truly badass folks in military that could decimate their families using military equipment, most likely won’t follow those orders. Why kill those you swore to protect? It doesn’t work that way. It just doesn’t.
Ime indigenous from England & I absolutely believe in the Right to Bear Arms. 🏴
How about the fact that the military is country loving Americans
And that is what King George III tried to do to the American Colonists and is one of the reasons we have 2A. And why 2A does not specify what weapons we are allowed to have. The founding fathers knew history and the history of weapons. They KNEW weapons would be improved and new ones made. And to keep gov. honest we had to be able to own anything they had.
Spot on. Most American military member's would also remember that their oath is to the united state,its citizens and not the politicians
Meanwhile in Canada...
At least 50% of the military would be on the peoples side
Without the second ammendment, you have no rights! NEVER, EVER LET THEM TAKE YOUR GUNS!!!!!
The citizens of America should be able to possess the exact same arms as the military and the police and to argue otherwise is to argue in favor of the government holding a monopoly on power over the people which is absolutely antithetical to the design of the founders and to our constitution. The second amendment was put into the bill of rights to ensure citizens the means to overthrow a tyrannical government, not to deer hunt, which logically implies that the government should never be better armed than the people. To the people that think only the government should have “assault type weapons,” the police and military were never meant to be armed more heavily or efficiently than the citizens. This would defeat the whole purpose of the clause.
There's no reason I should own a 30mm mortar, anti personnel mines or a Browning machine gun.
@@ftwitsucksI got a reason: they're cool as shit!
We The People significantly outnumber them!
What she doesn't comprehend is lesson learned...Americans will never again fire on Americans.
What people don’t get is the US military are US citizens from the local community. If the “government” actually tried stuff. Lots would leave and defend their communities.
What you don't get is that we've been held under a fire hose of brown world immigration. There's spanish only national guard units lol. Pay attention to South Africa, that's our future
Vietnam, Afghanistan (twice), and the American Revolution… and they don’t think an armed civilian populace can stand up to the most powerful militaries and weapons on the planet.
LMFAO
Afghanistan sind survive and revenge they did not win the rest gave up because they had no enemy they could fight Vietnam look a not propaganda documentary and tell me that's a kind of victory you want
I became and American citizen for twenty years now 🇺🇸🙏 I survived the Pol Pot, Khmer Rouge in the 70’ ( Cambodia in communist regime.) Charlie is correct. Pot Ppot did just that and it resulted in almost 3 millions Cambodians massacred, killed by their own communist government. Please, protect our second amendment right🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
They're currently trying to take all of them in Canada
How many ex vets and ex special force vets r conservative that would stand toe to toe along with florida man, rocky mountain phsycos and Texans
@@robertarmstrong9166 US civilian gun owners easily number in the tens of millions. The current head count of the US military stands at 2.5 million. It wouldnt be a fair fight.
Besides, when Brandon tossed out that clear threat against the US people (his BOSSES) I dont think he realized that he needed soldiers to run those "tanks and jets". Unfortunately for him, an order to take over the US by force would end with most military personell flipping him the bird and taking over all the bases for OUR use against him. Oops. He CLEARLY did think that threat through.
Thank you for teaching this generation what schools don't teach.
Another relevant point right now is that in my news feed this week, twice I have come across reports that all of the US armed services are currently sitting a little below quota for ready for active duty members.
This implies increased vulnerability.
In 2015 we (Army MPs) were doing role play of going house to house taking weapons from the people. This is when I chose to leave the Service.
As a Hong Konger, Charlie is 100% right.
🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ Diese Waffenbessenheit der Amerikaner
❤ MAGA ❤
Indoors its hot grits and grease. Outside its rocks glass holes etc...
I did not hear a word MISS BEAUTIFUL SAID😒
Im sorry beauty is a distraction for me and she won❤❤❤
🟡. So here in Michigan i am charged with MCL 750.227 in which i will be imprisoned for a 5 year felony by exercising a God Given Inalienable right to the Second Amendment concealed or open carry within the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution.
It Shall Not Be Infringed upon allowed from the government by permission as a privilege by the issuance of a license or a permit.
This action is converting the exercise of a God Given Inalienable right into committing a crime by the enforcement of an unconstitutional enacted racist Jim Crow law in Michigan in 1927 expanded in 1931 after the Dr Ossian Sweet incident in 1925 Detroit, Michigan.
With writing of State of Michigan Constitution in 1957 and ratification in 1963 contained the following language in Article I, Clause 6 " Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state. " complied with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Neither the Second Amendment nor Article I, Clause 6 contain any prohibitions to the manner in which to exercise the God Given Inalienable right to keep and bear arms either concealed or open carry.
Furthermore Article VI, Clause 2 prevents any laws enacted that are contrary and repugnant to the United States Constitution are null and void of enforcement as law.
As far as states rights are concerned within the Tenth Amendment a state may grant more rights and privileges to we the people that the United States Constitution does not provide for but they may not restrict or ever take away any rights as provided for by the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, or the United States Constitution.
What country is Michigan or any other state located in ?
Is Michigan or any other state located in America ?
We The People have the God Given Inalienable rights to the Second Amendment concealed or open carry within the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution.
It is the preemption law of the land by the Supremacy Clause, Article 6 Clause 2 is very clear that no law can be contrary to the United States Constitution.
It Shall Not Be Infringed upon allowed from any level of government by permission as a privilege granted by an issued license or an issued permit.
As far as states rights are concerned within the Tenth Amendment allows for the states may grant more rights and more privileges to we the people than the United States Constitution or federal law does not provide for but they may not restrict or ever take away any rights as provided for by the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, or the United States Constitution.
The claim of " in the interest of public safety or an officer's safety " does not negate the exercising of the Second Amendment by feeling or emotions.
Does a person ask the government for permission each time that they exercise God Given Inalienable rights as a privilege by a license or a permit ?
What about saying a prayer or going to assemble at a church or the press printing a newspaper or an article ?
So why does that apply the Second Amendment preemption ? 🤔
Americans do not understand how important is! Please, keep it!
I talked to an x-military and he said they would not fire upon a US citizen if ordered.
Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. I rest my case.