it gets really more complicated if you think that regular site projects are referred to a national grid system and the buildings in a local system. The surveyors work with these systems. Then the conversion is not only a move operation but also contains a scale factor. I always make those conversions outside Revit, so I am glad that the location works independently because it allows having the correct sun analysis. If the site is massive then it gets even more complicated because, sadly, the earth is not flat, and if you ignore that the things you design won't fit correctly in the ground.
why did I found out about this today? :( I'm currently modelling a building a mountain, and dealing with levels ranging above 300 meters from sea level . I had a lot of questions
I have a practice where I match the internal, survey, and project points, including coordinates and elevations, to ensure that my BIM elements are accurately located and aligned. This process has helped me when working with IFC models from other engineering softwares. Do you think is a good practice when only architecture is being develop inside revit?
Now I know why landscape architects always hv problem linking their model into the building model. Others keep pbp to the origin, use shared coordinate, and relocate project tools to position and reposition buildings. She's does the opposite.
Amazing. I could have listened for 2 more hours!
it gets really more complicated if you think that regular site projects are referred to a national grid system and the buildings in a local system. The surveyors work with these systems. Then the conversion is not only a move operation but also contains a scale factor. I always make those conversions outside Revit, so I am glad that the location works independently because it allows having the correct sun analysis. If the site is massive then it gets even more complicated because, sadly, the earth is not flat, and if you ignore that the things you design won't fit correctly in the ground.
why did I found out about this today? :( I'm currently modelling a building a mountain, and dealing with levels ranging above 300 meters from sea level . I had a lot of questions
I have a practice where I match the internal, survey, and project points, including coordinates and elevations, to ensure that my BIM elements are accurately located and aligned. This process has helped me when working with IFC models from other engineering softwares. Do you think is a good practice when only architecture is being develop inside revit?
Where in the video is the room part?
How do you do mass or percentage planting in large areas?
Check out our first session together, Nehama covered planting
@@bimpure I looked at first live and first video. Neither are mass percentage planting?
Now I know why landscape architects always hv problem linking their model into the building model. Others keep pbp to the origin, use shared coordinate, and relocate project tools to position and reposition buildings. She's does the opposite.
! Raffle
!raffle