@@basketcase6999 the 6th Doctor would have fitted - it was even part of his storyline, being put on an exercise and diet regime by Mel. But of course, we aren't allowed to say anyone's fat these days, so it was cut out, like it never happened. Ahhhhh, censorship.
0:20 showing his future incarnations, two of them even past his regeneration cycle, is funny enough. But the Time Lords really decided to make the Doctor look at the image of 13 holding the fob watch containing a past they are holding from him lol
Surprised they did not use Peter Davison. He was still in his teens as the time, but one of the original illustrations did resemble the Davison Doctor. Jodie Whittaker I understand confirming that the Time Lords are true gender benders.
@@mrsmirnoff8715it will never happen beyond some new pictures that were used for the 50th anniversary special cause he has started he never wants to be compared to his father or diminish what his father did on the show
Personally, I felt like this was exhibit A in everything wrong with the desire to force connectivity at the expense of good storytelling. The Second Doctor's regeneration is horrifying and tragic. His last moments are in pain and discomfort, seeing him spiral further and further away from us into a dark abyss... and the next time we see the Doctor, it's a new man who collapses out of the TARDIS. It's an incredible end to one of the most ambitious and brilliant serials in the show's history. But there's a certain kind of fan that demands a checklist be ticked off for regeneration. "We need to see the moment it happens! We need to see the face morph!" - bollocks to that, it's completely extraneous here, and frankly it reduces the impact of the original. No disrespect to the people who worked on these extra scenes, but does it really actually add anything to see the Doctor sitting in a chair in the TARDIS as he is engulfed in regeneration energy just to make it more modern? The colourisation work on this was fantastic, but if there's one thing this 90-minute cut made clear it's that you just cannot touch the original.
Honestly all of war games is the only time the time lords felt like a true threat and you almost felt a sense of uneasy the whole time . I think it’s a such a poor choice to make them this decadent bunch of old farts and then I guess it got better when they initially built on the time war as a concept but it got flanderised when they had to visualise things like nightmare child and all the other events mentions off handed. Less is good. I’m only accepting a complete reboot of this show now. Canon or not they already shot themselves in the foot
I enjoyed the colour, but not the edits. There is a certain appeal in having things not be confirmed or denied by the creators. It allows us the audience to come up with wild theories that fit in the canon but also can be disproved just as quick. By telling us certain details through edits, it solidifies the truth and destroys the mystery. The joy of a mystery is not knowing whether it's true or false.
I love how the Tardis can't decide if it's the 1970s or the 1980s. The 10th doctor said he worked for UNIT back then but didn't know exactly when it was. Good thinking, RTD
Moffat addressed it too, in The Day Of The Doctor when Kate and Clara pass by some files deatiling Doctor's involvement with UNIT in the Black Archive, Kate says that they are "from the 1970's or 1980's, *depending on the dating protocol."*
The UNIT dating controversy has been subject of debate for 50 years. Web of Fear was set forty years after the Abominable Snowmen which had been set in 1935. The Doctor re-united with Lethbridge-Stewart four years later. Jo Grant was forty years after 1926 as she said in Carnival of Monsters and Sarah Jane said she was from 1980. Mao Zedong happens to be alive even though he died in 1976 and Thatcher happens to be PM making Terror of the Zygons set in or after 1979. Personally, Pertwee is set in the late 1970s.
@@fadikhoory5350My mind canon is a compromise between 1970 and 1980, with the 3rd Doctor arriving on Earth in 1975, so that five years later, Sarah can be from 1980 in "Pyramids of Mars".
@@fadikhoory5350 yet that part was omitted and I wonder why??? Oh yes, it’s now a censorship issue as the media is too sensitive to acknowledge it as it is consider xenophobic. Just can’t joke anymore.
That is a genuine clip from 'Spearhead from Space' part 1, the first time we actually saw Jon Pertwee in the classic era. He spent the rest of the episode unconscious.
I think this is an interesting idea but its also sacrilegious because it gets rid of the mysterious lure of how Patrick troughton regenerated into Jon Pertwee from black & white to colour. But this edit is interesting and fascinating but it gets rid of the feeling of finding out what happened between the war games and spearhead from space
Not sure about that. We just know they send him back to the Tardis and he regenerates in the chair. It could have had many adventures before he sat down.
The main reason there was no regeneration shown originally was because when they shot the scene they didn’t have the next regeneration casted yet and to give fans new content while they casted a new doctor the comic released new original adventure of the doctor now known as season 6b
kinda wish they had used sketches of the future incarnation's faces, similar to the sketches used in the original, instead of the stock images. that way it's less "these are your future selves" and more "these are faces you may possibly have in the future **wink wink** **nudge nudge** ". having them just use promo images, some even holding their screwdrivers and everything, is a little weird.
We'll just act like Season 6B didn't happen, then? Never mind that the 2nd Doctor's regeneration was already shown in The Night Walkers, which takes place after The War Games. If the BBC were going to make any changes, they could've established that Season 6B happened, and adapt the regeneration from The Night Walkers.
Probably my biggest gripe with this was they used promo images of new who incarnations when classic would’ve also worked just as well. Would’ve been better if Matt Smith was the “that one’s too young” because he IS the youngest to play the role. The special felt like just another Daleks in colour mess
Well...not quite. 6B has the 2nd Doctor retain his face for several years in between the sentence and his regen. That gap can still be inferred....we don't see the start of the actual regen inside the TARDIS
Yeah... 6B still happens, its in between the scene where the Doctor's on trial, and the scene where he's on that TV screen. 0:45 that black screen is where 6B takes place
Dang. Forcing the Doctor to choose his next appearance, while we're going deaf thanks to the poor sound mixing, and they're all incarnations he will become. Definitely an incredible bunch for sure!
Sorry but i just think this is stupid, Jodie and Peter were post regeneration cycle so they shouldn't know about them yet. 2. Removing hes too fat, because we literally cant have a single line in anything that doesnt deem to modern standards 3. Say what you want about them including Jodies image but frankly all the thats there for is to again try and Retcon into past episodes that the doctor can change gender.
I'm still convinced that Two regenerated into the Fugitive Doctor. It makes sense given that her Tardis closely resembled the Second's on the exterior and interior. And given that the first we see of Three is him falling out of the same Tardis, that seems like a perfect place to patch the Fugitive into the timeline. Any rumors that she predates the First Doctor is just a result of Toymaker shenanigans.
He did. The CIA takes Two a picosecond before the spinning faces He works for the CIA He regenerates into Ruth She Escapes Gets caught by the CIA and they degen her back to Two with an extra regeneration Two is placed back at the end of War Games to regenerate into Two Three was the face the Time Lords choose, Ruth would have been his true regeneration. Also the bits with the future incarnations aren't canon.
This is an amazing idea and actually fits into the Doctor Who canon and The Doctor's timeline perfectly. They should have done something like this instead of making The Doctor the creator of all Time Lords. I hope they erase the Timeless Child stuff from existence.
If by 'deep lore', you refer to whatever nonsense has been introduced since it was cancelled n the 1980s, then I am very glad not to get up in that drivel.
So... Why are 13 and 12 there? Because putting the Timeless Child stuff to one side just for a moment, they're from a new set of regenerations he got at the end of 'Time of the Doctor'. The Time Lords shouldnt know they even exist.
Spot on, this bugs me too. Even granting that the Timeless Child stuff means The Doctor would have unknowingly actually had further regenerations available (not my preferred canon, but whatever)... It was meant to be a big deal that there would be more incarnations past the Eleventh. It was meant to be a proper shock and legitimate surprise when "(No Sir,) ALL THIRTEEN" Doctors show up to save Gallifrey on the last day of the Time War. But nah, nevermind that... It turns out all those future incarnations were well documented and on the record as early as the War Games. Just patiently waiting for their respective series, all according to the BBC release schedule.
I can't watch this. Why did they have to ruin it by colorizing it?! It's not meant to be seen in color, it was filmed in black and white for viewing on black and white televisions. Nothing colorized ever looks natural or good. It looks like they colorized it just because "Eww black and white bad!"
The anti-fans complaining about everything, going on a never-ending tirade about every single solitary thing, but still considering themselves to be rational minds and not tantrum throwing toddlers will always be funny, especially so since they view anyone to the left of them displaying passion or emotion to be ‘triggered’ and ‘whiny,’ which is just hypocritical of these anti-fans.
The person to ask about that would be a bloke called The Confession Dial on RUclips that did an entire extended cut of the regeneration a few months back - that's where most of these clips of Jon and Pat in the TARDIS come from. :)
0:14 How did they know what doctor they would pick over the years. I thought they would find random famous people and pick them to be the doctor. Did they reserve their spots or something.
You know, there IS a point before he starts to spiral where you can see his face straight on. After I saw the original, I misremembered it and thought that Pertwee's face appeared there. Wouldn't be a bad idea. Maybe some fan can do that.
Radio Times at the time showed double page diagram of their faces from one through to three with two in middle so this never any question this is now it happened that way.
Disked this for future viewing but saw the regeneration moment and Jon Pertwee stumbling out the Tardis and thought "Now that's when Doctor Who WAS Doctor Who and none of this woke crap that it's now become!". You can tell I'm an old schooler... I'm Tom Baker era but Jon Pertwee was a good Doc just a bit before my time...
When the doctor says he’s to old least Capaldi is seen, he’s too thin we see Tennant when he said that ones too young we see Whittaker, and when he said that one won’t do at all Smith appears
@@joshthedrewthey were going current era versions, and given the other two options were Eccleston or Gatwa, I’m not surprised Jodie got put in. Ncuti is the incumbent so story would be nonsensical in a way, and Eccleston… well, I think he’s seen as persona non grata right now with his criticisms (warranted imho), so - limited. I was surprised in a way Matt was the last one… but I thought it funny because he based his versions personality a bit on Troughton, so basically 2nd is spiting himself on keeping a bit more of his personality.
Everything after Peter Capaldi is utter garbage, and I can't even bear to watch it anymore. I thought Chibnall was the death sentence, but RTD's pathetic gay agenda was the final nail in the coffin. As someone who was a devoted fan since 1963 it's very saddening.
I’m totally with you! I started watching with the first episode, and I thought Jodie Whittaker was the absolute low point (ok, I only watched 15 minutes of it), but this gay stuff is ridiculous. I’m pleased that the latest Christmas special had the lowest viewing figures - it hasn’t been Doctor Who since David Tennant left (yes I know…)
‘Gay agenda’ so you admit to being homophobic, because only homophobes complain about the inclusion of queer people and whine about a ‘gay agenda’ to ‘groom and indoctrinate people.’
@@SurreyMan0409 I actually considered Matt Smith to be my favourite Doctor of all, but I was pleased to see Tennant reprise the role in those specials, even though it made little sense in the end. What they ultimately did with him, just shuffling him off into "retirement" and never to be mentioned again, was completely appalling. Russel T. Davies is a complete agenda-driven hack.
There’s a fan edit that did a better job with showing future incarnations that more accurately fit the disapproval descriptions that the Doctor gave here, but I appreciate the effort.
@@CaptApril123I believe that's just for the regeneration bit, the photographs of the future Doctors was done well before with Colin Baker in the "Too fat" role.
I am not a fan of the future incarnations showing, but I wish they at least kept in the switch with matt smith and jodie where patrick says to jodie "this one wont do at all"
We all know why Jodie's Doctor is there, because they want to retcon past episodes to try and reassure audiences that it was always part of the lore that timelords can change gender. Well i have news for you, you wont like but its true, it was never referenced in the original series because they cant change gender. It was introduced in the 2010s plain and simple and rather than come up with some way around it or bring back the Rani or bring in new timeladies, they just genderswap the master and then the doctor. Missy was well cast dont get me wrong but why couldnt she just be the Rani? Im literally willing to bet my life savings we will never see a male version of the Rani, an established female timelady. You cant change the past bbc, no matter how many flashy colours you put on it. So get bent, Dr Who has been butchered into the ground
if they were aware of her, then they would be aware of there own destruction, plus it just wouldn't make sense they would offer to let him take the appearance he is going to eventually take anyway. the whole thing would be dumb.
This is great. I haven't watched much of the early Doctors. Very surprised to see the scene of the Second Doctor debating with the Timelords what his next appearance will be like. In all these years, all the clips I've seen surrounding the topic of regeneration, I've never seen that one ever, and it's such a key scene!
It's not " Connecting" it's making it consistent since new who introduced a lot and changed a lot they have to make it more consistent with the new additions to the lore while yes I may agree that some of the changes are a little weird they are not the worst in the world and can be excused...look I mean no harm to you this is you're opinion but it feels like you're just hating on new who just for no reason just because it's a trend now among the fans
More of this!! Current who is awful! The writers have forgot how to write the doctor!! Stop the virtue signalling and go back to the story dictating how events happen and not inserting current day DEI!
I have no problem with them adding colour, remastering, adding modern CGI etc. What I don't want is for them to alter the plot, or push their social agenda on to work that is not theirs to change.
This is a multiverse doctor not the actual doctor from the classics that is probably why this was inserted, it explains a lot since RTD took over even the CIN special when Davros was different how the 14th Doctor came back with the same face, The Beatles are different everything even The Doctor's character is off. Either The Doctor is in a multiverse since Flux the fob watch would have contained a multiverse load of doctors that would have destroyed the 13th doctor as these were not her memories.
What a utter mess, and it would be best if the BBC and the present show runners actually made decent Who today rather than trying to mess with Who that went before that does not need fixing, just leave it alone for the love of god.....thank go i own all the restoration dvds and will never have to see this trash.
@@channelwithouthonestly these whiney overreactions. Replacing the crude sketches (you'd think the Time Lords would have something a bit more advanced) with pictures of future incarnations is an "utter mess" apparently
@@channelwithout Why should art in any form be altered from the way the artists created it because some have the attention span of a spoon, so maybe said art should be left alone as it was intended, and those who can't be bothered to appreciated it as the artists intended, should go and find something less taxing for their little mind, maybe a copy of the works of Shakespeare or Dickens with half the pages ripped out so these fragile little souls can deal with said books. lol
@@MarcAquino1095 this is how people like this always are with alternate cuts of anything. Even a completely optional alternative is seen as something that shouldn't be allowed to exist. Same thing with any 20th century or imported media. They'll complain that there shouldn't be any more ways of watching it then wonder why nobody is watching anymore.
Pathetic crap. Why can't they leave the classic stories alone. Colourize each episode in full with NO MODERN CRAP added in to make it for the gen Z idiots.
No one is taking the original away. it's still there available for you to watch it. There are many fan-made colorisations, that do what you've described. hope this helps
The original is a 10-part rambling mess. Back in the 1970s they were doing this to classic stories as well. Pbs aired abridged versions. Also, they made a shortened version of the daleks as a movie "Dr. Who and the daleks" I view these new versions as a what if we got a movie edit or a movie adaptation
@@THEONCOMINGTENNANT Look pal. That is my view. Colourize by all means. But do each episode in full, and don't add crap in to link it to the modern stuff.
Whittaker's a fine actor, and indeed had her strong moments in the series. Power of the Doctor being the highlight of her tenure, in fact. She was merely let down by poor writing choices, as was the rest of the series.
@DB_137 I agree. Sacha Dhawan was great as the Master too, especially in his 'Doctor' guise. Jodi needed a better director, a less crowded tardis because that hindered Davidson at times as the Doctor, and some solid writing.
@@thequietestengine Honestly the three companion family dynamic suits Whittaker in some ways, her character always seemed loyal and protective, yet also the cringey highschool teacher. "Fam" is all I'm saying 🤣🤣
Note how the "that one's too fat" has been removed.
We haven’t got a fat Doctor yet for them to use as an image. Maybe they’ll do that for the fifteenth.
Would probably be a bit harsh calling an actor fat. I don't think any of the incarnations of the Doctor were fat anyway.
@@basketcase6999 the 6th Doctor would have fitted - it was even part of his storyline, being put on an exercise and diet regime by Mel. But of course, we aren't allowed to say anyone's fat these days, so it was cut out, like it never happened. Ahhhhh, censorship.
@@theDWshowto be fair, it did tighten up the sequence
@@steveg5122 I'm not sold on that. We're talking, what? Two seconds? We're not clawing back some really noticeable amount of time.
The way they addressed the dating controversy was genius!
The regeneration was created by the Confession Dial on RUclips
0:20 showing his future incarnations, two of them even past his regeneration cycle, is funny enough. But the Time Lords really decided to make the Doctor look at the image of 13 holding the fob watch containing a past they are holding from him lol
Surprised they did not use Peter Davison. He was still in his teens as the time, but one of the original illustrations did resemble the Davison Doctor. Jodie Whittaker I understand confirming that the Time Lords are true gender benders.
They were like “lol guess what she got in her hands buddy”
They should have given a couple of the options as RTD or The Moff.
@@donmccullen1973He was twenty something when he played the doctor I think
@donmccullen1973 he was 29 when he became the Doctor. Surprised they didn't have a clip of Pertwee.
The best part is that mid regeneration he looks like Sean Pertwee
I still have a hope that Sean Pertwee will play the 3rd doctor someday.
I was sorta expecting Sean Pertwee to cameo haha
For a moment, I actually thought it was him.
@@mrsmirnoff8715it will never happen beyond some new pictures that were used for the 50th anniversary special cause he has started he never wants to be compared to his father or diminish what his father did on the show
Personally, I felt like this was exhibit A in everything wrong with the desire to force connectivity at the expense of good storytelling.
The Second Doctor's regeneration is horrifying and tragic. His last moments are in pain and discomfort, seeing him spiral further and further away from us into a dark abyss... and the next time we see the Doctor, it's a new man who collapses out of the TARDIS. It's an incredible end to one of the most ambitious and brilliant serials in the show's history.
But there's a certain kind of fan that demands a checklist be ticked off for regeneration. "We need to see the moment it happens! We need to see the face morph!" - bollocks to that, it's completely extraneous here, and frankly it reduces the impact of the original. No disrespect to the people who worked on these extra scenes, but does it really actually add anything to see the Doctor sitting in a chair in the TARDIS as he is engulfed in regeneration energy just to make it more modern?
The colourisation work on this was fantastic, but if there's one thing this 90-minute cut made clear it's that you just cannot touch the original.
It also completely contradicts the Season 6B theory, which kinda got confirmed by the 5 Doctors and 2 Doctors
Honestly all of war games is the only time the time lords felt like a true threat and you almost felt a sense of uneasy the whole time . I think it’s a such a poor choice to make them this decadent bunch of old farts and then I guess it got better when they initially built on the time war as a concept but it got flanderised when they had to visualise things like nightmare child and all the other events mentions off handed. Less is good. I’m only accepting a complete reboot of this show now. Canon or not they already shot themselves in the foot
I enjoyed the colour, but not the edits. There is a certain appeal in having things not be confirmed or denied by the creators. It allows us the audience to come up with wild theories that fit in the canon but also can be disproved just as quick. By telling us certain details through edits, it solidifies the truth and destroys the mystery. The joy of a mystery is not knowing whether it's true or false.
@@novawolf_gamingno it didn’t we got to see flashes of season 6b right before his regeneration
Well said
I love how the Tardis can't decide if it's the 1970s or the 1980s. The 10th doctor said he worked for UNIT back then but didn't know exactly when it was. Good thinking, RTD
Moffat addressed it too, in The Day Of The Doctor when Kate and Clara pass by some files deatiling Doctor's involvement with UNIT in the Black Archive, Kate says that they are "from the 1970's or 1980's, *depending on the dating protocol."*
The UNIT dating controversy has been subject of debate for 50 years. Web of Fear was set forty years after the Abominable Snowmen which had been set in 1935. The Doctor re-united with Lethbridge-Stewart four years later. Jo Grant was forty years after 1926 as she said in Carnival of Monsters and Sarah Jane said she was from 1980. Mao Zedong happens to be alive even though he died in 1976 and Thatcher happens to be PM making Terror of the Zygons set in or after 1979. Personally, Pertwee is set in the late 1970s.
@@fadikhoory5350My mind canon is a compromise between 1970 and 1980, with the 3rd Doctor arriving on Earth in 1975, so that five years later, Sarah can be from 1980 in "Pyramids of Mars".
Yes I thought that more than deliberate
I would say, 1976-7 as Sarah Jane Smith said she was from 1980 in the pyramids of mars.
Love the glimpse of the pod that would be a major plot point in the next story.
Good catch. I saw them but it just didn't register in my dusty databanks.
2:07 love the little foreshadowing to Spearheads From Space with the meteorites!
cackled at “that’s too old!” & “that’s too thin!” Lolol
The doctor sure does loves insulting his other selves lmao, how the timelords were smirking
@@snickerboi3723the “He’s Too Fat” segment is edited out and that would have been Colin Baker(Ms. Piggy).
And you wouldn't be cackling at 'well he's too fat isn't he?'
@@fadikhoory5350 yet that part was omitted and I wonder why??? Oh yes, it’s now a censorship issue as the media is too sensitive to acknowledge it as it is consider xenophobic. Just can’t joke anymore.
@@fadikhoory5350 I would to be honest haha, Colin baker pops up “he’s too fat isn’t he”
I like how when he came out of the Tardis at the end of the video, it shook and wobbled a bit just like a summerhouse bought from B&Q.
That is a genuine clip from 'Spearhead from Space' part 1, the first time we actually saw Jon Pertwee in the classic era. He spent the rest of the episode unconscious.
I think this is an interesting idea but its also sacrilegious because it gets rid of the mysterious lure of how Patrick troughton regenerated into Jon Pertwee from black & white to colour. But this edit is interesting and fascinating but it gets rid of the feeling of finding out what happened between the war games and spearhead from space
Not sure about that. We just know they send him back to the Tardis and he regenerates in the chair. It could have had many adventures before he sat down.
Most likely especially with the three doctors and five doctors
@@AkeeyanI2 And Two Doctors... though I can certainly understand why you might not want to think about that one too much.
The main reason there was no regeneration shown originally was because when they shot the scene they didn’t have the next regeneration casted yet and to give fans new content while they casted a new doctor the comic released new original adventure of the doctor now known as season 6b
@@kevin10001 Past tense of cast is still cast, not casted.
Considering how the Shalkra Doctor was canonised in the episode Rogue I wish he was a optional incarnation shown to the Second Doctor
I think it would be funny (and better) to use ones from Curse of Fatal Death.
They couldn't have known past 12 at the time. They didnt even begin the time war until after.
kinda wish they had used sketches of the future incarnation's faces, similar to the sketches used in the original, instead of the stock images. that way it's less "these are your future selves" and more "these are faces you may possibly have in the future **wink wink** **nudge nudge** ". having them just use promo images, some even holding their screwdrivers and everything, is a little weird.
@highway_roadkill agreed
We'll just act like Season 6B didn't happen, then? Never mind that the 2nd Doctor's regeneration was already shown in The Night Walkers, which takes place after The War Games. If the BBC were going to make any changes, they could've established that Season 6B happened, and adapt the regeneration from The Night Walkers.
What's The Night Walkers?
@@ACtheLegend A short comic book story from 1966.
Saw this like brilliant 😁 thanks for the upload
I’m glad you enjoyed ☺️ I know that people outside the UK can’t watch 💙
A regeneration is like having a panic attack
Probably my biggest gripe with this was they used promo images of new who incarnations when classic would’ve also worked just as well. Would’ve been better if Matt Smith was the “that one’s too young” because he IS the youngest to play the role. The special felt like just another Daleks in colour mess
Season 6B fans weeping.
It still works in the cannon
Well...not quite.
6B has the 2nd Doctor retain his face for several years in between the sentence and his regen. That gap can still be inferred....we don't see the start of the actual regen inside the TARDIS
Yeah... 6B still happens, its in between the scene where the Doctor's on trial, and the scene where he's on that TV screen. 0:45 that black screen is where 6B takes place
@@HazarTulumYou mean the moment he literally starts regenerating?
@@T_Black_Lodge no? He literally starts regenerating when he's in the TARDIS in this version
This isn't available to watch in my country, did they really add the modern doctors there?
They did in fact. This is how it was aired on BBC Four.
Dang. Forcing the Doctor to choose his next appearance, while we're going deaf thanks to the poor sound mixing, and they're all incarnations he will become. Definitely an incredible bunch for sure!
Sorry but i just think this is stupid, Jodie and Peter were post regeneration cycle so they shouldn't know about them yet.
2. Removing hes too fat, because we literally cant have a single line in anything that doesnt deem to modern standards
3. Say what you want about them including Jodies image but frankly all the thats there for is to again try and Retcon into past episodes that the doctor can change gender.
I'm still convinced that Two regenerated into the Fugitive Doctor. It makes sense given that her Tardis closely resembled the Second's on the exterior and interior. And given that the first we see of Three is him falling out of the same Tardis, that seems like a perfect place to patch the Fugitive into the timeline. Any rumors that she predates the First Doctor is just a result of Toymaker shenanigans.
He did.
The CIA takes Two a picosecond before the spinning faces
He works for the CIA
He regenerates into Ruth
She Escapes
Gets caught by the CIA and they degen her back to Two with an extra regeneration
Two is placed back at the end of War Games to regenerate into Two
Three was the face the Time Lords choose, Ruth would have been his true regeneration.
Also the bits with the future incarnations aren't canon.
This is an amazing idea and actually fits into the Doctor Who canon and The Doctor's timeline perfectly. They should have done something like this instead of making The Doctor the creator of all Time Lords. I hope they erase the Timeless Child stuff from existence.
What drivel are you spouting?
@@kiernanwalker3852 deep lore shit. You wouldn't get it.
If by 'deep lore', you refer to whatever nonsense has been introduced since it was cancelled n the 1980s, then I am very glad not to get up in that drivel.
So... Why are 13 and 12 there? Because putting the Timeless Child stuff to one side just for a moment, they're from a new set of regenerations he got at the end of 'Time of the Doctor'. The Time Lords shouldnt know they even exist.
You answered your own question. You can't put the Timeless Child to one side, and that sequence was added after Chibnall introduced the concept.
@@dazdavey3566 Blimey it's all getting a bit messy, isnt it?
Wibbly wobbly timey wimey ;)
@@josephf.4540 exactly
Spot on, this bugs me too.
Even granting that the Timeless Child stuff means The Doctor would have unknowingly actually had further regenerations available (not my preferred canon, but whatever)... It was meant to be a big deal that there would be more incarnations past the Eleventh. It was meant to be a proper shock and legitimate surprise when "(No Sir,) ALL THIRTEEN" Doctors show up to save Gallifrey on the last day of the Time War.
But nah, nevermind that... It turns out all those future incarnations were well documented and on the record as early as the War Games. Just patiently waiting for their respective series, all according to the BBC release schedule.
I wonder when they update the ‘Regenerations 1966 - 202?’ If they include this, it is official BBC job I don’t see why not
My favourite doctor out of them all..Jon Pertwee .😊
I can't watch this. Why did they have to ruin it by colorizing it?! It's not meant to be seen in color, it was filmed in black and white for viewing on black and white televisions. Nothing colorized ever looks natural or good. It looks like they colorized it just because "Eww black and white bad!"
Very funny how they changed to actual Doctors! 😂
A nasty experience to wake up and find you'd become Sylvester McCoy but Dr McCoy from Star Trek wouldn't be so bad!
It’s worse than that - he’s dead, Jim!
The anti-fans complaining about everything, going on a never-ending tirade about every single solitary thing, but still considering themselves to be rational minds and not tantrum throwing toddlers will always be funny, especially so since they view anyone to the left of them displaying passion or emotion to be ‘triggered’ and ‘whiny,’ which is just hypocritical of these anti-fans.
Christ this is an official BBC release?
Yes. The War Machine - in colour. The 10 part series, colourised & edited down to a 90 minute special.
@@wylco1959I watched the original series, and it really dragged. 3 or 4 half-hour episodes would have been fine, but ten was far too much.
I love this! Very well done!
How the hell did they do it with a younger Jon?
CGI, likely bits from his first serial.
They used clips from his first season
The person to ask about that would be a bloke called The Confession Dial on RUclips that did an entire extended cut of the regeneration a few months back - that's where most of these clips of Jon and Pat in the TARDIS come from. :)
0:14 How did they know what doctor they would pick over the years. I thought they would find random famous people and pick them to be the doctor. Did they reserve their spots or something.
Should have been other Doctors like Peter Cushing or Richard E. Grant. Or Rowan Atkinson.
It's fan service
This isn't the original version of the story. They added in the other Doctors for the remaster. They originally used sketches.
Don’t like that they used future incarnations, they shouldn’t have just stuck with the original sketches
Even sketches of the future doctors would work, instead of actual images. This looks fanmade.
You know, there IS a point before he starts to spiral where you can see his face straight on. After I saw the original, I misremembered it and thought that Pertwee's face appeared there. Wouldn't be a bad idea. Maybe some fan can do that.
Oh no... that one looks like a scarecrow!
I prefer the original, because it implies that the Time Lords knew about the second regeneration cycle due to Peter Capaldi being an option here.
3:31 need to touch grass.
Of all the regenerations this was the saddest.
He looks like Tony Montana in the thumbnail 😂
An abomination how they have retconned this! Just colourize the original transmissions!
agreed. And I also loved the regeneration scene so I would just leave that part in. (I want to make my own edits)
@@emptyspotlight yeah, that was the only good part of it.
Radio Times at the time showed double page diagram of their faces from one through to three with two in middle so this never any question this is now it happened that way.
Excellent work !!!!
When Dr Who was great Tv.
Season 6b happens at 1:31 everyone stop complaining about this contradicting it when it explicitly acknowledges it
This is just flashbacks. Nothing to do with season 6b
That's just previous stories from the 2nd Doctor's era
Disked this for future viewing but saw the regeneration moment and Jon Pertwee stumbling out the Tardis and thought "Now that's when Doctor Who WAS Doctor Who and none of this woke crap that it's now become!".
You can tell I'm an old schooler... I'm Tom Baker era but Jon Pertwee was a good Doc just a bit before my time...
Just can’t leave things alone can you? 🙄
What did they do in the TARDIS, deep fake Troughton and Pertwee with the right models/actors?
When the doctor says he’s to old least Capaldi is seen, he’s too thin we see Tennant when he said that ones too young we see Whittaker, and when he said that one won’t do at all Smith appears
Should have switched Jodie with matt for too young.
A female doctor would have been ridiculed in 1969 unfortunately.
I would’ve changed it to too young is Matt Smith then won’t do at all is either Sylvester McCoy, Paul McGann or Christopher Eccleston
@@joshthedrewthey were going current era versions, and given the other two options were Eccleston or Gatwa, I’m not surprised Jodie got put in.
Ncuti is the incumbent so story would be nonsensical in a way, and Eccleston… well, I think he’s seen as persona non grata right now with his criticisms (warranted imho), so - limited.
I was surprised in a way Matt was the last one… but I thought it funny because he based his versions personality a bit on Troughton, so basically 2nd is spiting himself on keeping a bit more of his personality.
@@MediaArchive2-z9f Ironic, considering that Troughton was the first to suggest a female Doctor.
Fan fiction, modern day creators retroactively changing the past to cement the god awful storylines from jodie whitakers era. RIP DOCTOR WHO
Everything after Peter Capaldi is utter garbage, and I can't even bear to watch it anymore. I thought Chibnall was the death sentence, but RTD's pathetic gay agenda was the final nail in the coffin. As someone who was a devoted fan since 1963 it's very saddening.
I’m totally with you! I started watching with the first episode, and I thought Jodie Whittaker was the absolute low point (ok, I only watched 15 minutes of it), but this gay stuff is ridiculous. I’m pleased that the latest Christmas special had the lowest viewing figures - it hasn’t been Doctor Who since David Tennant left (yes I know…)
‘Gay agenda’ so you admit to being homophobic, because only homophobes complain about the inclusion of queer people and whine about a ‘gay agenda’ to ‘groom and indoctrinate people.’
@@SurreyMan0409 I actually considered Matt Smith to be my favourite Doctor of all, but I was pleased to see Tennant reprise the role in those specials, even though it made little sense in the end. What they ultimately did with him, just shuffling him off into "retirement" and never to be mentioned again, was completely appalling. Russel T. Davies is a complete agenda-driven hack.
There’s a fan edit that did a better job with showing future incarnations that more accurately fit the disapproval descriptions that the Doctor gave here, but I appreciate the effort.
I think the person that did that edit was actually hired for this one.
@@CaptApril123Yes. The Confession Dial collaborated with the BBC on this. This is their work.
@@CaptApril123I believe that's just for the regeneration bit, the photographs of the future Doctors was done well before with Colin Baker in the "Too fat" role.
I am not a fan of the future incarnations showing, but I wish they at least kept in the switch with matt smith and jodie where patrick says to jodie "this one wont do at all"
I prefered that drawn version of the future doctors, not google images where theyre holding the sonic loll
That would just be exploited by right wing Doctor Who fans, they would see it as validation, and they don’t deserve it.
We all know why Jodie's Doctor is there, because they want to retcon past episodes to try and reassure audiences that it was always part of the lore that timelords can change gender. Well i have news for you, you wont like but its true, it was never referenced in the original series because they cant change gender. It was introduced in the 2010s plain and simple and rather than come up with some way around it or bring back the Rani or bring in new timeladies, they just genderswap the master and then the doctor. Missy was well cast dont get me wrong but why couldnt she just be the Rani?
Im literally willing to bet my life savings we will never see a male version of the Rani, an established female timelady.
You cant change the past bbc, no matter how many flashy colours you put on it. So get bent, Dr Who has been butchered into the ground
if they were aware of her, then they would be aware of there own destruction, plus it just wouldn't make sense they would offer to let him take the appearance he is going to eventually take anyway. the whole thing would be dumb.
You’ve redecorated me. I don’t like it.
Why was exiled?
Wait is this like official or fan made?
@@keru80101 it’s canon
This is great. I haven't watched much of the early Doctors. Very surprised to see the scene of the Second Doctor debating with the Timelords what his next appearance will be like. In all these years, all the clips I've seen surrounding the topic of regeneration, I've never seen that one ever, and it's such a key scene!
An absolute desecration of the war games.
Did they really add those modern doctors to it? That’s just wrong
This is orwellian. Rewritting history on a time travel show.
the revised ending of my favorite doctor who story. i don't like it.
Why didn’t his TARDIS explode?
Why would it explode?
Regeneration doesn’t cause the tardis to explode
I really hate retconning. But it was nice to see the third Doctor. Maybe some fan can correct the regeneration .
Why do they feel compelled to connect everything to poo(new) who? It's not even popular anymore.
It's not " Connecting" it's making it consistent since new who introduced a lot and changed a lot they have to make it more consistent with the new additions to the lore while yes I may agree that some of the changes are a little weird they are not the worst in the world and can be excused...look I mean no harm to you this is you're opinion but it feels like you're just hating on new who just for no reason just because it's a trend now among the fans
Great regeneration sequence with a nice added touch of the Autons following the TARDIS down. More drama in 3 1/2 mins then the entire last season.
Not canon or in-continuity
Canon as it gets. This will replace the old/bad version going forward. Thank goodness.
@ Gotta light
Best DW this Xmas
Nonono BBC, your 'fixing' the wrong thing. It's modern doctor who that needs fixing
A terrible decision
More of this!! Current who is awful! The writers have forgot how to write the doctor!! Stop the virtue signalling and go back to the story dictating how events happen and not inserting current day DEI!
Such an improvement
I have no problem with them adding colour, remastering, adding modern CGI etc. What I don't want is for them to alter the plot, or push their social agenda on to work that is not theirs to change.
That was brilliant
This was sooooo stupid 😒
Just brilliant.
Should have regenerated into Tony Garner
Nausea inducing, imposing images from the new bullshit on proper Dr Who.
This is a multiverse doctor not the actual doctor from the classics that is probably why this was inserted, it explains a lot since RTD took over even the CIN special when Davros was different how the 14th Doctor came back with the same face, The Beatles are different everything even The Doctor's character is off.
Either The Doctor is in a multiverse since Flux the fob watch would have contained a multiverse load of doctors that would have destroyed the 13th doctor as these were not her memories.
What a utter mess, and it would be best if the BBC and the present show runners actually made decent Who today rather than trying to mess with Who that went before that does not need fixing, just leave it alone for the love of god.....thank go i own all the restoration dvds and will never have to see this trash.
Almost like it's simply an alternative way to view the story and doesn't replace the original or anything?
@@channelwithouthonestly these whiney overreactions. Replacing the crude sketches (you'd think the Time Lords would have something a bit more advanced) with pictures of future incarnations is an "utter mess" apparently
@@channelwithout Why should art in any form be altered from the way the artists created it because some have the attention span of a spoon, so maybe said art should be left alone as it was intended, and those who can't be bothered to appreciated it as the artists intended, should go and find something less taxing for their little mind, maybe a copy of the works of Shakespeare or Dickens with half the pages ripped out so these fragile little souls can deal with said books. lol
You would have a heart attack if you ever learned what a YTP is, lmao
Complete vandalism.
The original is still available, no one’s taking that from you.
@@MarcAquino1095 this is how people like this always are with alternate cuts of anything. Even a completely optional alternative is seen as something that shouldn't be allowed to exist. Same thing with any 20th century or imported media. They'll complain that there shouldn't be any more ways of watching it then wonder why nobody is watching anymore.
Could you be any more vitriolic?
Dreadful absolutely dreadful
they just keep shovelling soil into DR who's grave
That was cool. Much better. I love the original (I was around when it was broadcast), but this is much less 'clunky'.
Pathetic crap. Why can't they leave the classic stories alone. Colourize each episode in full with NO MODERN CRAP added in to make it for the gen Z idiots.
No one is taking the original away. it's still there available for you to watch it. There are many fan-made colorisations, that do what you've described. hope this helps
@@Andy.Gledhill.Models. You forgot to take your 💊’s again.
The original is a 10-part rambling mess. Back in the 1970s they were doing this to classic stories as well. Pbs aired abridged versions. Also, they made a shortened version of the daleks as a movie "Dr. Who and the daleks" I view these new versions as a what if we got a movie edit or a movie adaptation
@@T_Black_Lodge CRETIN.
@@THEONCOMINGTENNANT Look pal. That is my view. Colourize by all means. But do each episode in full, and don't add crap in to link it to the modern stuff.
Pertwees face was AI
No, it was stock footage. AI was used to clean up the picture quality, but his face itself is genuine.
Kind of sh-t.
Horrible to see they have polluted classic Who with Whittaker, the smug, feminist usurper. At least she wasn't gurning at the camera for once.
Sure thing Grandpa let’s get you bed.
Smug feminist usurper? 😂 She's just an actress playing a role. It's not that deep mate.
Whittaker's a fine actor, and indeed had her strong moments in the series. Power of the Doctor being the highlight of her tenure, in fact. She was merely let down by poor writing choices, as was the rest of the series.
@DB_137 I agree. Sacha Dhawan was great as the Master too, especially in his 'Doctor' guise. Jodi needed a better director, a less crowded tardis because that hindered Davidson at times as the Doctor, and some solid writing.
@@thequietestengine Honestly the three companion family dynamic suits Whittaker in some ways, her character always seemed loyal and protective, yet also the cringey highschool teacher. "Fam" is all I'm saying 🤣🤣