US Testing its New Gigantic $13 Billion Aircraft Carrier
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 июн 2024
- US Testing its New Gigantic $13 Billion Aircraft Carrier
in every four aircraft carriers in the world belongs to the United States. And their total combined deck space is more than double that of all other nations combined. But the biggest worry for competing nations isn’t that, it’s the United States’ Supercarrier. This $13 billion aircraft carrier holds the title of the largest, most powerful aircraft carrier in the world. Now, there have been many supercarriers over the years with one losing the title after a successor is introduced - like the James Bond title. Welcome to USS John F. Kennedy - the 21st-century Supercarrier.
#US #gigantic #supercarrier
🔹THUMBNAIL - JUST ILLUSTRATION🔹
Thumbnail inspiration/credit: paul chadeisson
💙 Subscribe to get the latest updates:
/ frontcost
©️ COPYRIGHT / LICENSING
We strive to create more exciting videos about the latest military tech. BUT if you are a copyright owner and have some claims toward content in our video (pictures/video clips), PLEASE send me an e-mail to frontcoster@gmail.com, and we'll delete or pay for using it immediately.
That was interesting - the narrator was telling us about the nuclear reactors and we were looking at someone checking the oil level in a Diesel engine.
Ha ha ..you noticed that too.
I was shouting "Nooooooooooo............. DON'T DIP THE REACTORRRRRRRRRR........" looked like he was having a good sniff too.
This is clickbait 'content' at its best. Lots of video snippets barely related to the topic and some knucklehead reading copy he knows next to nothing about.
LOL, I commented on that too.
@@fodank Yes, and I'm still waiting to see the "testing"!
I was 2 Air Craft Carrie' . Franklin D Roosevelt and USS America. 1975 and 1976. Enjoy every Moment. Retired Navy Veteran.👍👍👍👍⚓⚓⚓⚓⚓⚓⚓
You was?
How did you manage 2 deployments on 2 different carriers in 2 years? What was your rate? Where did you serve? I was an AO on CVN-70.
I was in the Navy from 90 to 94. Still kicking myself in the @$$ for not staying in. My dad was also in the Navy and served on the U.S.S. America during Vietnam. He got out about 1973. Thank you for your service.
@@stevelawrence8352 thanks for your service. Best of luck to you and your Family.
@@geraldmurphy1428 Thank you. Looking back, I wish I would have stayed in and retired. Hindsight's 20/20.
Proud US citizen...Thank you USA.
looks so great
We are in the class of super-carriers. Soon will be mega-carriers, ridiculous carriers, and finally ludicrous carriers.
at this rate, S.H.I.E.L.D. Helicarriers just like in the Marvel Avengers films.
As farmers in the us we definitely need to raise more raspberries to help with the war effort. Those radars aren’t gonna jam themselves.
@@shilohgardner Lord Helmet agrees!!
Do the ludicrous Carriers go ludicrous speeds?
the ludicrous carriers will be Battlestars and will operate in space
I had a friend who ran a nuclear power plant on a carrier (1 of 2 ) he said that they will go about 20 yrs before they need refueling and etc. that really is amazing, they say the subs are about the same. they usually have 2 because they need to go down on occasion. but 20 yrs without fuel is darn impressive. i think the value of nuclear is very under rated .
It's undervalued because of the risk it possesses. If one of those Subs or carriers sink, it'll cost a lot of money to either raise them from the sea bed or to cap them in concrete so their waste does not leak into the water way.
Edit: If interested, the Russian Kursk submarine was sunk in the Arctic and they're still having issues with it 20+ years later. Couple cool videos on the incident
It certainly is impressive...20+ years of energy stored but you also need to think about the other side of the equation.
Nuclear energy going to be the end off use there s be 100+ underground nuclear tests then there's the big concrete dome near bikini islands full off nuclear crap the USA left in case any general might read go you really need to go look at that dome the sea is hitting it as your doing nothing about it the rest off use will suffer when all that nuclear wast USA left gos into the sea
@@cris-vv1pn What are you even saying?
Nuclear has drawbacks and there is tech that rivals it depending how you use it.
Given human crews depend on regular "refuelling" that 20 year frame between refuels would be an real big advantage with automated systhems.
Then, reactors may run for 20 years with one fuel package, but the periphery needs maintance that can only done in an base, so it is relative too.
It is an impressive number, but as long you can not build everything else that plays into the whole to go on for 20 years too you can not really have an advantage.
That reactors can be run underwater at full power without the need to surface at all, that is the real advantage, not the 20 years, if they would run only one year or six month without refueling, that would make them as much an asset as 20 year refueling cycles.
the 20 years number is more to impress the civilians, but for the purpose they have, it does not really give an big advantage aside that you do not have to worry so much for fuel logistics.
Carriers need jet fuel that is the real limiting factor (even the best carbon based fuel go stale in matter of month)
Submarines need a pletora of refills on an monthly basis to work fine, if fully equiped you can stretch that to 3 or 4 month, then they are not fully operational anymore.
Thanks for the update. I served on CVN-72. Would be great to get a tour of this class of carrier.
I was so lucky my grandson, Jordon (Engineer at Newport News) invited me to attend the Christening of the JFK--Dec.7, 2019. When President Kennedy's daughter (Caroline) 52 yrs. later, tried to Christen the aircraft carrier, the bottle once again did not break on the first swing. It was a funny moment on a very cold day at the port. Beautiful day. Thanks Jordon!
99
“Nuclear reactors are like Nuclear bombs… but not really” Well I’m glad to hear that!
Right, they want to destroy man.
I was onboard the USS R.K. Turner CG20 (Guided Missile Cruiser) that was shotgun for the USS Theodore Roosevelt in the Gulf War 91’. GO NAVY!!
Personally, I'm kind of glad I left TR before that went down. I was stationed at Great Lakes while that went on.
Fantastic!!! American Exceptionalism! Long Live the Republic ! The United States of America!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🙏!
I was on the Nimitz CVN-68. In the late 80s. Steam catapults were the beast. That is old school now.
I just saw a video yesterday about the new catapult system talking about how much it's better than the old steam catapults obviously myself being an army man never experienced the old way and never will the new but as a brother in arms I say go Navy
@@josephgriffin3688 Yeah I think it is some some kind of magnetic system Now. I'll have to do some homework. Thank you for your service. Always thought the Army was cool. Cheers brother!
@@SunCoastFilms you know I've watched so much and read so much since I saw that video I honestly don't recall if it said it was magnetic but it was here on RUclips that I saw it I can look through my history and send it to you if you wish. Also thank you for thanking me but I honestly feel very uncomfortable getting thanked because I considered my service a privilege and honor and I don't feel the need to be thanked even though I think fellow veterans myself in fact I was given a great honor a few years ago. I met a World War II veteran and thanked him for his service he was with his wife at the time and she told me that I was the first person that had ever thanked him. Our World War II veterans come from the greatest generation and it disgusts me the ingratitude of the civilians thinking themselves so Almighty and privileged and completely disregarding us veterans and active duty members.
@@josephgriffin3688 I try to think every veteran I can. I do alot of filming on my Channel in cemeteries. I always give a shout to several. Read their name and rank and thank them for their service and sacrifice.
@@SunCoastFilms Electromagnetic. Apparently the principle benefits are that it requires less fresh water (No steam), supposedly easier and cheaper to maintain (Believe that when I hear it over time though it is possible), it's supposedly quicker to recharge and fire allowing for more frequent launches upping the sortie/day numbers, and that it can be dialed in more exactly in terms of the force needed so while it can still launch heavy planes it can also be dialed back to launch lighter drones without damaging them.
So far it's apparently had reliability issues, breaking more often than the Steam catapults. Where that is in being addressed, I don't know.
Narration makes a mistake in describing the length of a supercarrier. "Three football fields SIDE-BY-SIDE" would be 580 feet (160x3). The proper description should have been "longer than three football fields placed END-TO-END" (300x3). In actuality, it would be more accurate to state "nearly the length of four football fields."
My father was on The USS Kitty Hawk CVN-63 1968 to 1983. Actually worked on the radar system of the A-6 Intruder
So?
The Shitty Kitty, and she lived up to that nickname since when in port she smelled so bad.
@@navychop6667 My pops was just calling her that very name
@@robertfelixjr.6717 She replaced the Independence when I was station in Yokosuka, Japan on the Vincennes.
@@navychop6667 Getting ready to take my pops to San Diego. They made her a floating museum there I believe.
I was with the marine air wing contingent on the USS Nimitz back in 1975. Impressive vessel.
I was on the nimitz jan 75 plank owner. It is still a great ship
THE PENTAGON literally says BOXCUTTERS (in 4 separate incidents!!!!!) UTTERLY DEFEATED THE GREATEST MILITARY IN HISTORY on 9/11.
I have millions more of these that prove THE WORST MILITARY IN HISTORY is Murica's.
AMERICA'S MILITARY SURE IS BIG (like McDonald' Rump's butt!)....but THAT DON'T MAKE IT SMART, ha ha.
My cousin was on the Nimitz in that time frame. It was a beast.
Thank you for your service sir 🫡
Great video!
Just an FYI, the latest carrier in the Ford class capable of flight ops is CVN-78 which is the Ford. The JFK, CVN-79 is not currently operable. It is still being built.
@Bullseye But it's never launched a single plane let alone left the yards for any reasonable amount of time. Hence my comment about operability.
@Bullseye November 2021 the ship was still under construction and USNI reported that parts from the ship were being removed and sent to the USS Ford to replace broken parts on the Ford.
Per USNI News the parts taken from Kennedy for Ford range from pumps to limit switches, HMI screens for stores elevators as well as motor controllers, power supplies, small pumps, limit switches and valve actuators for various systems throughout the ship,”
@@pogo1140 Exactly. The 79 cannot do flight ops yet. So 78 took parts so it can continue doing flight ops.
Love those ships as a Merchant Marine.
I always enjoy working with US navy ships
My brother was a merchant Marine and serves on a funeral detail for the American legion now. I find it funny that when he started doing the funeral detail for the legion during the last few months of my active duty service in the military I was on military detail for funeral services while on active duty. I was originally part of the firing squad and then I elevated to being the commander of the firing squad. When I ETSd I actually had to train a guy who is twice my rank to take over my squad. I miss so extremely being on active duty.
Repent to Jesus Christ!
“Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us.”
Romans 5:3-5 NIV
h
Yes 20+ years refueling for the ship, but the crew still has to eat, muntions have to be replenished and the jets still need JP5. Though they are awesome to serve and live on. God bless all the crews out there in the high seas.
They're very noisy to live on..
Will be destroyed by DF-21D, a hypersonic nuclear missile.
@@stevensoo6591 better be ready for hell to rain down on you when you do
People are clueless
@@stevensoo6591
Are you sure have you served in the Navy?
Maybe homeless veterans can live in it
You can say it again !
LoL
Great Idea!
@@arty4308 I can see ... if US Adminstration not careful about spending and keep printing money ... and they rank military more important than medical and housing ... eventually these big aircraft carrier will be abandoned .... ghost ship ... matter of time .. we can see it
Funny story, I was on a hill in Point Loma CA. watching a new aircraft carrier come into the Navy harbor base in San Diego. I was excited and kept clicking my camera getting pictures from every angle. My wife who was only mildly impressed said to me "come on, how many pictures do you need, its just a ship" A few moments later a guy was excited and wildly taking picture, after picture of the same carrier. followed by his wife saying, "why do you need so many pictures? My wife looked at me and said........... guess it must be a man thing.
Being at a elevated level looking down at one of these wonders of the world is a WOW moment.
I remember Point Loma well. It was always a point fix landmarker to guide us in the navy and mark our points for our fixes coming in and out of sand diego
It must be a woman thing to get annoyed when their husbands finds something more interesting than them. How shallow on the part of BOTH these wives!
@@ThomasSDavis-mc9of agreed, a women gets a new pair of shoes and the man is expected to show excitement, and great approval.
Who clicked after seing the thumbnail and was disapppointed to see the GFF?
Enjoying your videos
Excellent video well done
This video is a lot of things, but excellent is not one of them. Lots of inaccurate video clips stitched together to fill in the time while they talk about what they know little about. Just saying... Cheers, D.
I was an airman on cvn,-65 it was great now they've made it greater😹 I was in squadron VA-95 that's what we need, get them in the air and show no mercy oorah, oorah
Couldn't agree more. LoL
Imagine if we as a society put this much effort into making our world a better place to live.
nothing but weapons weapons, and more new ways to kill people.
WHERE THERE's A WILL, THERE'S A WAY.
We have tens of millions of EMPTY GOVT BUILDINGS across the nation.
Millions of empty houses, just DECAYING EMPTY.
Millions of empty apartments, just decaying....empty.
We have no choice: we have to start burning their mansions down.
We have a right to self defense.
THE PENTAGON is such a complete CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, that Dubya, Obama and the rest had to THREATEN OUR ALLIES WITH ANNIHILATION:
"IF YOU EVEN THINK OF INVESTIGATING OUR ENDLESS WAR CRIMES, we reserve the right to BLOW OUR ALLIES OFF THE MAP, starting with the WORLD COURT in The Hague, Netherlands!"
AND EVERY JOURNALIST (all war criminals under current laws) COVERED THIS UP FROM THE PUBLIC, bc it PROVES we are the new nazi germany, but less honest or lawful!
Thumbs up good job
Excellent video.
Quote: "Nuclear reactors that are like atomic bombs, but not really." end of quote. First, nuclear reactors are nothing like bombs. Reactor operates by sustained controlled fission of slightly enriched uranium, usually in the form of pellets embedded in zirconium set in rods and deposited with boron containing control rods in in the reactor core, fuel must be surrounded by the moderator in water-pressure reactors it is water and in RMBK - graphite. And so, the operation of the reactor is the right balance between the amount of active control rods, the coolant, the moderator, and the fuel. Fission gives huge amounts of thermal energy, a heat, that combined with water gives steam and steam drives turbines giving electricity.. Quite simple rules, right?. Far from a bomb which, in one of types can be set on the implosion lens, used to initiate a sudden fission of the fission material - highly enriched plutonium - as a highly unstable material, it is easily subjected to rapid fission, generating a huge amounts of energy in a sudden and uncontrolled burst. So it is not even close to each other, huh? To whom have you prepared your clip, for children in age up to 6? Cos level of your text is like that.
Also the A1 reactors are far "from the most powerful"
Quite a step up from the last one I was on, the USS Valley Forge, our last coal fired steam engine powered carrier.
@@jeffsantarpio tbh: I was 8 years old. I “served” 14 years as an Air Force brat, then when I tried to enlist they turned me down.
Robert Schulke, Thanks for your service!
That’s great. I was aboard the USS Constitution on a tour. I’ll add that to my service record.
Thank everyone for their service!! Thank you thank you thank you! We fought nothing but wars of aggression for corporate interests since the last honest war (WW2) but thank everyone, including me for 6 years in the USAF! Oh aren't we so special keeping everyone safe!!!
I want to barf when people try to spew this empty, politically correct plastic fuzzy. It was a job. I volunteered thinking I would see the world and get some experience (which I did on both counts). I was not a hero and very very few were. And we don't go around honestly thanking people for doing their daily job. Not unless we are brainwashed. So stop it.
Awesome!
Well done Michael Chern! Keep that Guy on his Toes!!!!
In junior high I did a report on super carriers like the USS Nimitz. When they are fully manned and fueled they were capable of staying out at sea for 13 years without ever docking but they however had to dock every few years to get that barnacles scraped off
Wouldn't food be the biggest limiting factor?
@@garystarr9176 no food is loaded at sea
@@garystarr9176 when they have everything stored food wouldn't be the issue nor anything else because military rations can actually last for years on the shelf. We have what's called MREs meals ready to eat back in the old days of the 40s and 50s they were called C rations which meant canned rations. MREs some of them are absolutely delicious others are completely disgusting LOL. My favorite was beef stew or the chicken and rice. There was one that took me over 3 years before I would try it and it's the omelet with ham. I just couldn't imagine packaged egg tasting good but it was actually quite delicious. But military rations are made to give us enough energy even if we only have one a day instead of three meals one MRE can sustain us with zero problems. As I said already they last for years obviously when unopened. I find it kind of comical the first time I experienced anything that had a massive shelf life was when I was on missionary work in Labrador. They had these leader sized cardboard boxes of milk that could last for over 6 months without souring and it was true milk not something synthetic. It tasted like normal milk. But to reiterate a supercarrier staying out at sea for a decade or more has no issues when it comes to the food unless the sailors don't like what they're being served and want to mess with the cooks LOL. The super carriers are actually like a small City they even have their own post office. Not just a a little postal department it's considered an actual post office. Granted the report and studies I did were decades ago and it might have changed since then but it doesn't seem logical to think it would especially since they've only grown bigger. The sailor compliment back then was over 3,000 and some over 5,000 for a supercarrier. They're an amazing beast. I wasn't Abrams tanker and they are also one badass machine. Even without the bullets they are a lot of fun. The engine is a jet turbine just like in any plane that flies around the world. It takes 12 gallons of fuel just to start it. Normally there is an engine governor keeping it at 45 mph or less I've had mine one of mine I should say 10 miles over that. Without the governor that 77 ton beauty can do 95 miles an hour. When you get to go as fast as you can in them it is one hell of a rush.
Repent to Jesus Christ!
“Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us.”
Romans 5:3-5 NIV
J
@@jesusislord6545 The NIV is one of the worst translations of the scriptures because it's inaccurate and summarizes crap leaving out details that are extremely important. I probably have more information than any priest minister or Reverend or pastor you've ever met because I have done extensive and I mean years of extensive research into the scriptures. I am not a bible thumper and unfortunately I have not been able to spread the gospel enough to be able to quote many verses anymore. But I probably have more knowledge than you could imagine about the scriptures and God's ordination and decrees. Don't challenge me when it comes to scripture I will bury you. My faith is as unwavering as the sun and just as hot.
America the Beautiful. Home of the brave, land of the free.
It used to be. Not so much anymore.
……….the US is only as tough and weak as it’s politicians allow…..what with this mighty fire power if politicians are afraid to use it.
Very Cool!
Love seeing my old squadron in these videos
111 years ago in 1910 we were taping wings to our arms and trying to fly.. I say we have come pretty far lol.
With a little help from the Martians. 😜
Perhaps for US readers but mankind's attempts to do that are documented from just pre 1800.
You need to study your history, pal. In 1910 the first cargo shipments were being made by airplane (Wright Flyer) and the English Channel had been crossed by plane. The first ordnance had been fired from airplanes and the handwriting was on the wall for the massive role airplanes (invented and flown for the first time in 1903) would play in warfare. Cheers, D. P.S. Yes, though, we have come far since 1903.
Had to check it out after seeing the teaser frame posted. No us carrier would land planes toward a fixed structure on a carrier, ever.
Kinda thought it looked like the Battlestar Galactica on water but, dumber.
Clickbait photo got you.
Love these videos. Love my country. U.S.A!!!!!!!!!
I served on the USS Constellation CVA-64. She was one bad a** machine. I did the shaft alley watch for a month or so. Then developed a rash on the back of my legs (from sitting on the so many hatches before going down to see what the 4 propellar shaft's temps were). Went to one of the ships Dr's'...I got transfered to the bow on the flight deck. Much better. There is one action packed area. I remember these #'s about the cat's...They were sending 20-25 ton airplanes off from a dead start & in 280' going up to 165 mph... in 2-1/2 seconds.
Was exactly 50 yr ago...our longest time "on the line"...49 days straight. The only time "off" was during a launch. The rest of the day (14-16 hrs...was tieing down planes during a recovery. When that was over...we untied the jets and freed up the bow for the next launch.
You have made an error you need to correct in your description. I don’t know if this has been brought to your attention or not but the carrier you are describing is NOT the USS John Kennedy (which has in fact been around for several decades now as a Nimitz class carrier (I served onboard the Nimitz myself actually), the new super-carrier is the USS Gerald R. Ford, NOT the Kennedy.
And neither one looks like the clickbait that sucked me into this tired junk.
Thank you for your service God Bless
Actually, CVN-79, the new USS John F. Kennedy was launched on October 29, 2019 and christened on December 7, 2019. This video doesn't do a good job of explaining that and shows clips of several carriers and doesn't show the USS John F. Kennedy for some reason.
Just another load of click bait.
@@4376ED Yup, make sure you report his video for misleading title.
As a Royal Navy veteran I served on a carrier in my early career and freely admit to green eyed envy of the USN carriers then and now. I'm afraid that there is going to be a time in the not too distant future when carriers will go the way of the old battleships as technology will render them obsolete. Russia and China are developing hypersonic missile systems that have the potential to be a clear threat to large ocean going vessels well away from the combat zone or area of interest. But until that time comes these beautiful beasts will always be there to serve and protect us and our allies freedom.
Fortunately, as Russia and China are developing hypersonic weapons the US has been for decades working on hypersonic counter-measures. The Israelis have benefited from US interception technology in the form of the Iron Dome. There are other more lethal weapons coming online that can track and down a hypersonic missile with the use of high-powered lasers.
Hypersonic missiles are not as effective at sea apparently because they can’t maneuver too well at long distance. Reason is as a missile travels it has to curve which is why we use the slower ones already. The missiles are too fast for that kind of shot. Carriers can perform their duty by getting aircraft near the area to take out the missile sites. But not getting too close where a hypersonic missile can be a threat. This came off an article I read which could be false ofc. But give me your thoughts
@@juliopena2098 another gap in my knowledge filled. Thank you.
They may be in development but thus far they have tested them only on stationery land targets with limited success..
It's a big leap to hit a fast moving carrier at several hundred or thousands of miles away..They need land based control as well as satalite , radar and GPS all working together in real time to hit the carrier..
They are not fire and forget missles.
They are not there yet..
Neither Russia or China are close at this point in doing that..
It's already obsolete Brit Buddy. The final wars will all be fought with nukes. What every free country needs to do is (very secretly) plant hidden nuclear- headed missile silos all over the earth. THEN show proof to the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, and N Koreans etc. The FEAR this will cause will hopefully prevent "The Big One". God save the Queen.....
Looks like the bugs are finally worked out of the "electronic" catapult(s), and the incoming aressting cable units seem to be OK as well.
I was on the U.S.S. John F. Kennedy CV-67 from '84 - '88. The predecessor to this JFK. I was also on the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71. Also served on a couple of subs as well.
Thank you for your service. Retired Navy Veteran.
When were you on TR, sometime in the '90s? I was there '85 (PCU) to early '89.
Sweet vid !!!
Add in placements for rail guns, high energy lasers being tested. That helps future proof the new class of super carrier (Gerald Ford Class). Also, more subs have been outfitted with aerial drones that can be used to take out guidance systems near shore where anti-ship installations are often placed. Between that and 3rd gen stealth fighters there is really no adversary in the same category. Hypersonic is not yet functional and Russia/China love to brag about their capabilities whereas U.S. keeps quiet but keeps developing so any serious conflict would be unpleasantly surprising to the U.S. adversary. Russia likes to think they can compete militarily, but they are decades behind in technology and their air force is a joke with much of it mothballed or being used for spare parts. China is mainly looking to compete economically and believes that is the route to dominance. They may be right but it's the long game and nothing to worry about in the short term.
Agreed. It amazes me sometimes how people think a country with the GDP of Italy can match the US. China is much more formidable, but their airforce needs better jet engines in their aircraft than poor facsimiles of Russian design. Their stealth aircraft designs are highly suspect, and their subs are not very good. They are investing in missiles because of these deficiencies, which in turn makes them very one dimensional. Their reliance on Area Denial will leave them extremely vulnerable outside that area. And for a country that can't feed itself, and is heavily reliant on trade and fishing fleets, those are some pretty significant red flags.
I hauled from Long Beach, CA port 2 experimental F-22 Raptor fighter jet engines to a secret Navel testing site in the middle of a swamp in South Carolina. The engines barely fit into my 53ft semi trailer. This place was unmarked. No vehicles anywhere. I rang the doorbell. A scientist in a white lab coat told me to leave my doors closed and back into that only dock when the door opened. He closed it. As I got out of my truck. Two more guys in lab coats opened my doors and began unloading those engines. This place was full of jet and C-130 simulator's and so many other future Air force equipment. Fascinating stuff.
weak troll 0/10
This gives me some deep hope.
I spent some years on carriers. Really happy to be home now LOL
Thank you for your service sir God Bless
Supercarriers - no matter how large or lethal - are still extremely vulnerable to hunter killer subs and long-range anti-ship missiles
Possibly, but they each have 3-4 subs defending it and this super one would probably have its own iron dome like missle/torpedo defence system, it would be extremely difficult but not impossible to destroy it
the war you are thinking of....nothing is out of range or scope. Carriers are for Iran, Syria...or just in your face....You thinking WW3...you wouldn't survive even if hiding under a boulder in Grand Canyon....
@@StephenZ827 says you ,mr expert
@@questionauthority7377 No...but the actual expert have said so for years..
@@StephenZ827 Name your "expert", son. So-called "experts" are wrong more often than not. Never trust anyone who tells you they're an expert--they're the most likely to let their ego blind them.
That brings the fight to any enemy for sure.
The tumbnail looks like a star wars star destroyer
Love it and named approately.this vessel is amazing.looking forward to it career in the navy and world to deter any threat to our wonderful country.
Yeah, because that is why we have carries to sail around the globe… to protect “the homeland.” 🤣
I felt sorry for this video having so less views so I clicked XD
Cool
The generous man that was commentary in this video is more civilian than civilian.
“The range of the Navy is simply anywhere in the world”.
Laughs in Alice Springs.
You are within their range
Too fight over what,,, the WAR,,,is COVID WAR EXTREME FORCES FROM NATURE ,, WAR,, wild fires A war in California,, soo soo spend wisely Ammmerica? .
@@peteguard3571 I served aboard the USS ENTERPRISE, I appreciate your comment. 👍
@@oscarantoniomoreno5247 Thanks for your service.
@@oscarantoniomoreno5247 so is it true you could run that baby at 18.56 warp speed?
4:00 Seeing that super carrier turn at speed was spectacular.
but also FAKE as hell!
you KNOW there's no cargo / crew on that thing, and that was a DEMO turn to show something it could / would NEVER do while packed with planes, bombs, etc!
I don't know about nuclear plants. But on this clip at # 430 on the tape, while you were talking about nuclear, you were showing two 16 cyl 645 EMD Diesel engines made by GM. 38 yrs working on EMDs.
thanks
Nice video in every components. especially labelling of superiority characteristics of aircrafts carriers & aircrafts of US naval forces
SO says the guy who can barely type proper English...
Interesting that there are no comments made about about on going issues with the new systems
there were always ongoing issues with the old systems too. It is an ongoing fluid evolution, always has been. The nimitz class and those before always has issues and upgrades. SLEP
This 'history' of the supercarrier gave me gas.
I was aboard USS John F. Kennedy, CV-67 for 4 years back in 1986 and 1990 - 1993.
The title and thumbnail are a bit hyperbolic. The Ford is basically an upgraded Nimitz. There isn’t anything truly groundbreaking about it. It isn’t even completely sorted yet. Meanwhile there are almost a dozen Nimitz carriers in service. Point is that if you need to fear the Ford then the Nimitz will be just as lethal and you should equally fear the Nimitz.
PLUS THEY'RE ALL USELESS NO MATTER HOW YOU SLICE IT.
FACT:
WHO KILLS MORE OF OUR SOLDIERS:
ENEMY SOLDIERS.....or OUR OWN SOLDIERS???
#1 KILLER OF MURICAN MILITARY?
MURICAN MILITARY!
(Suicides!)
#2 KILLER OF MURICAN MILITARY??
(Friendly Fire!)
NO ENEMIES NECESSARY.
13 NYPD KKKOPS DIED IN 2019.
ALL 13 WERE MURDERED BY.....NYPD KKKOPS ha ha!!
11 suicides. (Adios!)
and impossibly, not one but TWO IDIOTIC FRIENDLY FIRE deaths... that were unrelated!! IN ONE YEAR?? IN ONE PD???????
WOW that musta been some great "RE-TRAINING" after you murdered your own teamate the first time that year! Months later, you AGAIN murder your fellow kkkop??
OOOOOOF!!!
DUMBEST HUMANS EVER.
So how good will the maintenance be on those electric catapults when they break down? How long would it take a crew to get them back up and running again when they break down? Will these guys need a degree at MIT just to understand how to fix them? I’m not so sure I’d feel safe in my jet on these carriers if I can’t trust the cat launch.
They are still having problems with them. If you can’t get a plane off of it then it really is an aircraft “carrier”.
Took them some time to get the electromagnetic catapults working properly but now they are completely functional, the Navy actually called on the advice and expertise of roller coaster designers that have been using electromagnetic propulsion for awhile now. As for the crewman, there is a crew assigned to the ship as it is being built, they are there to learn every part of their responsibilities on the ship so they have complete understanding of the equipment they are assigned to so they can perform correct maintenance and repairs while on deployment. Some of the benefits of this new technology is twice as many planes can be launched nearly twice as fast compared to the old system and the new catapult system uses half the space as the steam powered and only 1/4 of the maintenance needed vs. the old system.
@@robwalker4548 there are always an learning and perfection time for such systems.
The stream catapults take a hell lot of maintenance that’s why they opted for electromagnetic catapults instead. Though as a side benefit it also will allow the planes to operate for manny more missions, as the stresses in the airframes are far smaller.
Great engineering with indicipline crew then knocking something in the vast ocean is a norm.
Super
Footnote: Gerald Ford served on an aircraft carrier in WW II
As an army veteran I say HOOAAH, go Navy. I actually come from a long line of Navy and Marine service members. I was one of four that went into the regular army.
man i can hardly wait until the railgun tech is miniaturized and put on all our ships and craft and land armor!
heres to the future you proudly LEFT US...... CW5 DONNIE MIMS JR - R.I.P. !
@@tjcombo9328 while I was in the army they were trying to do away with the Chief warrant officers. The CW one and twos were given either the butter bar or silver bar lieutenant rank and the cw3s and four were either given captains or majors oak leaves. Our battalions cw3 at Our battalion Aid station was promoted to Captain. He would never answer to Captain he only allowed people to call him chief. And just for a comical side note I was actually walking over to weed Army hospital one day and I saw a cw2 female and boy was she cute LOL. I learned that bdus either made our sisters in arms look horrible or completely delicious. One of my friends married to fellow soldier and my ex-wife used to babysit their child because of the two of them having their duty shifts. I miss being active duty. If I were capable I would with no hesitation go back on duty to serve this Grand Republic and her people.
@@tjcombo9328 oh and we only had CW one through four there was no five
I was Navy, Made E5 then went CW. Anyways the JFK is a POS, one of the newest ACC is the Ronald Regan, commissioned in 2003 I think maybe later. It is a super carrier. The JFK was supposed to relieve us on station after 6 months didn’t happen, they were late by 2 months. POS JFK. Anyways he chose the wrong boat to focus on.
@@brettc1984 so you were a squid LOL I was what they used to call a dat and then because of the Abrams tank a cdat. Dat of course was dumbass tanker and due to the computerization of the Abrams tanks it became cdat which stood for computerized dumbass tanker. I know we have the rivalries between the branches But ultimately we are all DOD and we defend and protect this Grand Republic and her people. As a veteran I actually consider our police and firefighters as the true Homeland security because they do their jobs every single day keeping people safe whereas the government agency only arises during certain events.
Awesome video, but the Nimitz class carriers were not just built in the 70’s. They were also built in the 80’s 90’s and 2000’s the last one in 2009.
The video says the Nimitz class was commissioned in the 70's
@@kag2306 the video says that but the video implied that the Nimitz class carriers are a product of the 70’s but the 80’s batch, 90’s batch and 2000’s batch incorporated later technologies. He says that the carriers are only somewhat up to date blanket statement. The George Bush is only 12 years old and I seriously doubt they only put 70’s technology in it. Anyways that’s just my take on it. 🍻 🙂 I could be wrong also.
@@ValkyrieMagnus You're not wrong. It's just that the 'creators' of this 'content' know very little about what they've made video about. It's basically clickbait and if you're thinking you'll find any good information here, well, I think you're going to be disappointed. Cheers, D.
@@ValkyrieMagnus No, you’re right. There’s so many inaccuracies in this video.
@@fodank Of course it's clickbait... lol....the picture alone of that funky looking spaceship looking carrier isn't even what the vid is about so there's that! Lol...and yea...dodgy facts too.
Small in camera but in personal is Gigantic
China and Russia have Kuznetzov class carriers. Because putting out fires builds character
Russia isn't slacking off. It is unlikely they would ever fight anywhere in the Americas. The need for carriers isn't a priority. Land bases aircraft can do the job. Now with hypersonic missiles will be a game changer. Rendering surface ships in a real problem. As there is no defense against them. A hit from one of them can take out a small city without any warhead. China too has this capability.
IDK 🤔.......
CCP's Navy is new and untested....
Blummin Hec, that's one super carrier, I love our QE class carriers as there lovely looking carriers and innovative, but this is a whole new level, just not sure you've shown the Ford class, but just the Nimitz class, either way great ships 🇬🇧🇺🇲
It's comforting to know that we are still fighting WWII.
GETTING READY FOR WW III
BETTER KNOWN AS ARMAGEDDON
GO TO U TUBE PUT IN
60 minutes Australia
Chinese threat starting WW III
jb.ok
@@johnbenjamin2703 John. The United States, China and Russia have hypersonic weapons that render conventional warfare null and void. They have kinetic energy weapons that are launched from space and have the destructive force of a nuclear weapon. An aircraft carrier is just a target. A 13 billion dollar target.
The US continues to prepare to fight WWII again.
Russia has so tiny usable port areas. In Baltic sea, it is hard to go to the Atlantic ocean because of danish straits. And sea route from Black sea to Mediterranean is blocked by NATO country Turkey. In North Arctic ocean is mostly covered by sea ice. And on the Asian side, Russia has hardly any factories there and lots of sea ice comes there too. So, Russia has very few naval bases that can really work all the time. Using submarines is wiser, just because they may avoid contact to the enemy even in narrow places that Russia often has.
In US there are lots of ports and possible routes to the sea where enemies has hard time to do anything. If US doesn't have enough marine vessels, then enemies may land on several lightly protected areas. So USA needs its carriers., while ie. Russia doesn't need them.
Also Russia's land borders are crowded with enemies (you may argue that its their own fault) while USA has mostly allies and only 2 countries on its land based borders. So their armies will have very different things to handle when they prepare for war.
They figure they can use hypersonic missiles to get some parity. That tech is not mature yet though and the US is getting theirs
Russia doesn't need carriers ? Ahahaha
I didn't want to see the video, more interested to see the comments. 🙈🙈🙈
Spent time on the Eisenhower CVN 69, the “Love Boat”…
Regarding 4:15, nuclear reactors are not like nuclear bombs; instead nuclear reactors are more like steam turbine electrical power generators.
The aircraft carrier in the thumbnail isnt going to work unless all the planes are vertical landing aircraft
I like the comment `The country that has the most powerful aircraft carriers will win the war'. So what happened in Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan?
Politicians
Hard to fight a war with your hands tried behind your back.
limited warfare vs all out war
Thak you from a Airedale who served on the carriers America, Constellation, and Kitty Hawk!
It's very significant.
ya gotta love the attention to detail that they put into this video. i never knew we had a General R. Ford class aircraft carrier. i hope to God Grumman wasn't behind the video.
I've heard of a Gerald Ford, but not of a general of that name?
They missed the deal regarding American homeless and veterans with no health care, safe drinking water....
I wish I'd named my kid "Gerald" so that he could automatically attain a military rank and be admiralble to many people.
@@utubewillyman LOLOL.
🤣
The best aircraft carrier ever would be able to submerge. Imagine not being able to find it... after It just launched 90 fighters into the air, then submerges. Imagine if the deck could be the only thing above the water, at times, keeping visibility to a minimum.
Imagine PEACE ON EARTH
instead of Zionist jewish banker wars
Imagine not being able to find it, that's what the pilot said, sitting in his underground bunker in front of a computer located in area 73 that nobody can find.
Good very good
The flat top was born in Briton as was the dedicated first all-purpose aircraft carrier, angled flight deck, catapult launches, ski slopes, vertical take-off and landing fighter's, Radar and much more. Briton from the industrial revolution that started hear has always been a world leader
There were only 2 Nimitz class carriers built in the 70's. The USS Nimitz and Eisenhower. You made this video and know nothing about US carriers. The last Nimitz class carrier was the Bush which was commishioned 10 January 2009. You kept talking about the JFK and never showed it.
OK, BUT WE NEED 10 MORE BY 2026!
@@artzuiani6055 if the US needed 10 more carriers they would build them. I think the 10 nimitz-class carriers and two Ford class carriers are more than the rest of the world combined! More than adequate! Not to mention all the amphibious assault ships the US has. Which are larger than WWII carriers.
It may not look like it but the Navy is very protective of its ships. A lot of these films are made by the Navy then released to the public. You only get a needle point of information and no more. Sorry about that but myself wouldn't give the public nothing about our military except for propaganda.
Mighty ike I am a plankowner she stiiholds her own
@@qqube4762 Good point
I remember seeing this behemoth being constructed when I used to deliver containers at the port.
The "all capital" letters don't emphasize enough how MASSIVE this thing was. I remember going through the tunnel and seeing it and thinking "Holly shit, that's gotta be an aircraft carrier." No joke, that's exactly what it was. Go Navy 💪🏿
Thank you so all for your service. 🇺🇸
The military doesn't serve us and certainly doesn't serve liberty.
@@waypasthadenough the government is just all around problematic. However, this is a marvelous creation of destruction.
But are they just overbuilt outdated relics of a time far gone?
@@NorfolkKillaB Who owns the net and its infrastructure? Who makes the rules for it?
If we had no 'govt.' which neighbors would you be forced to kill first?
Works greatly as a huge target.
Still wouldn't affect it can shoot it all day and it'll be fine they tested older ones that were decommissioned and tried sinking it took five days jets shooting subs shooting only way it sunk a crew of men went on board and set explosives all over. So in real war I highly doubt anyone will ever be able to do that
Aircraft carriers have outlived their usefulness.
Interesting how many people assume there are no defenses for anti carrier measures factored in to the carrier itself and it's armada of escorts, not to mention the aircraft it carries.
One Poseidon = one carrier group.
@@badlandskid the Poseidon is probably fake. Anyway it doesn’t do more then a ICBM or maybe a few would do.
If you wanna use nukes no ships got a change. But then again using a Poseidon as an nuclear armed ICBM would result in an nuclear response. That would most likely result in an MAD scenario.
So it parasitically useless, as anything besides being an nuclear deterrence, if it’s even real in the first place.
@@mwtrolle cool story though
@@badlandskid you don't agree that a Posidon is nuclear-armed?
@@mwtrolle never said that.
But if it's fake as you have asserted then it isn't anything. 🤷♂️
Yeah my father in-law spent 30 + years in the navy he started out as a seaman and worked up to chief and retired commander, he was a electronics warfare officer and spent haft his life on the carrier…hell of a man…semper fi….
Awesome stuff, if only it could survive one DF17.
Still looking for that "new gigantic 13 billion dollar aircraft carrier."
Awesome power, super carriers have a whole battle group that surrounds them. It's like having an American base anywhere on the planet. They are as intimidating as it gets.
So true. I remember encountering one whilst on holiday in Corfu in the 90s while the Balkan conflict was raging. I was visiting the island’s capital, a medieval town of narrow winding streets, walking towards the harbour when, emerging into the open, I was totally dumbstruck by the sight of the carrier, towering over the town like some enormous, out of scale, alien mothership had landed. I think my jaw literally hit the floor. Easily one of the most impressive things I’ve ever seen, man-made at least, especially when contrasted with the Lilliputian surroundings of the ancient town
I think that Russia is a regional land power concerned principally with its border and some of the old USSR countries. Russia is self sufficient and is one of , if not the only country that spans two continents- both Europe and Asia. While Russia could be regionally aggressive and diplomaticallly global in influence : Russia has its defense against Western Europe, the Middle Eastern Turkmen republics and China on its plate. A large land area to defend with no sea front in most of Europe and Asia. The USA is a 'projector' of power and is without any enemies that can attack it over land successfully and hence the USA can build Carriers and Submarines in greater number and quantity to project influence.
Fighting against Germany and Japan with Allied power and support is one thing. Fighting against A Russian military might that can overwhelm much of eastern Europe, and have more land space, to buffer Foreign attack is something to consider. Now picture having to attack the largest country in the world add possible allies like China and Some Asian and Arab states. Let's see how effective your carriers will be. THERE WILL BE NO WINNERS. Maybe none of your carriers will make it back you your shores.
@@nigegibbs4547 they had sailing in troubled water for years. And if they were able to act one they know all he'll would follow in a matter of seconds with all the other ship around it that you don't see but are there
@@jessecriddle8644 he'll you say, the Taliban did not get hell, how would you give the Russiand hell, they counter you in every turn. Prayer will wor, So start playing. Never wake a sleeping giant, Germany did ask them what happened when thw Russiand came.to towm.
@@nigegibbs4547 I would pose this question. Why was Stalin so desperate and begging for the allied invasion of Western Europe if he could win on his own? Also Lend Lease helped Russia stay in it until they could build what they needed in adequate amounts and designs. And where was the USSR in the Pacific theater? They fought a one front war. A Herculean effort and their contribution in WW2 and the cost they bore are immense, but they couldn't do what the US did, which was wage war in a dominating fashion across multiple theaters. Something that is still true today. Russia has the GDP of Italy. They couldn't sustain what you are suggesting.
Nice big Target!
Largest Floating Targets !