“You know if I made the wrong choice, I can always switch again” -such a perfect Chelsea quote. And of course, Tony should be warned (in more ways than one...)
Great and informative video. As an ex Leica Q2 user I'm very happy with the decision of changing up to the Sony A7C. Yes, I wrote changing up because the A7C is a better camera on literally all aspects except for build quality (although the A7C still have a great build quality, the Q2 is a smidge better). Everyone including me like the picture quality and the sensors of Leica but the Sony FF cameras is on an other level and the stats talk for itself. Leica is known for being user friendly and that is one of their main strengths that ppl always mention, however I'd say the A7C is even better since it's so easy to get amazin, quick and extremely sharp fokus all day long with it.
If they gave her the Q2 instead, she would probably choose the Q2. The M9 is literally released at 2009, it's almost like comparing a feature phone to a smartphone.
You made the right decision for your declared use case. The 35 lux is amazing but the x100v will take a hell of a beating and still dust it off and fire off more frames ...ask me how I know. Next time around...x100v vs Q2 🥰
This video really speaks to me lol. When saving for a camera last year, I knew compactness was a top priority for me so the release of the Fuji X100V, Fuji X-S10, and Sony A7C in 2020 were super well-timed. I checked all 3 of them out and ultimately decided on the A7C because it has IBIS, long battery life, and a lot of cheap, compact, and well-performing third party lenses to choose from. The ergonomics and film emulation modes of Fuji cameras are still killer though! P.S. I agree that the A7C really shines when used with lenses that have aperture rings on them since it doesn't have a front dial (the new Sigma I series and the Sony 24-40-50 trio for example).
I love the range-finder style. A7C controls horribly in my opinion not because it lacks dials and buttons, but because it just has some seriously "bruh" things about it. For instance, you can't change settings with the touchscreen. I found myself turning the auto-EVF feature off because I kept triggering it due to its placement, but then every other camera I've ever had (Canon, Olympus, Panasonic) with an EVF, even if you turn the auto-EVF off, the EVF turns itself on when you close the screen. Not so with the A7C. I also don't understand why you need a dedicated exposure compensation dial when you could just use that for a general purpose control dial. That said, I still have it because it's the most image quality out of a compact camera right now, and it's the cheapest full-frame camera that has unlimited 4K video recording. But I feel like you're always fighting the UI to try to reach its maximum potential. I feel like if you gave the hardware to literally any other company, they'd find some way to give the A7C a soul because currently, IMO, it really lacks a soul. Also, I felt it was really uncomfortable to hold, but it's not too bad since I attached a full length plate that gives my pinky a resting place. Good thing it's not my primary camera because I think it's a frustrating camera, and it doesn't need to be.
@@mvhan911 The A7C has better battery life (I’ve never needed to carry a spare with me for all day shooting) and Sony has really great third party lenses. Those were the two main reasons why I didn’t go with the X-S10 even though it looks like a great camera.
Used the X100v for 4 months. Just two limited. The Sony is wondrously adaptable. I am playing with vintage lenses right now and the GM glass is comparable to any glass out there. Switched to the A7C and now it is my main, switched to Sony from Nikon, partly because of the video this channel did on the future of the camera industry. Fuji cameras have the looks but for me just not the legs to go the distance. The x100v is a super fun camera though and ultimately more portable. The A7C's biggest draw back is a lack of truly compact lenses from Sony. But if I were a pro and had a half dozen cameras I would definitely have an x100v. Great review.
Sony shooter here that has a x100V for the small compact camera ! The x100 series is a shooters camera! It is a lot of fun to use and it’s a different world from my work horse.
I hear you about not being able to go slow sometimes! Back when I was in High School _late 1970s_ , all the pictures I took on our Family vacations (with a Canon TX; with it's really actually totally mechanical shutter, advanced needle-and-ring metering system, and the aforementioned manual focusing) had Dad with his mouth open, yelling "Take the picture!" I literally mean ALL the family vacation pictures.
Love my A7C. If Fuji ever wakes up and puts a full frame sensor in the X100 series, let me know 😆 I do a lot of night photography, and the crop sensor can’t hang as well. Also, even the V trails behind the A7C in autofocus speed, and if you’ve got running kids/dogs… you’re gonna miss the shot.
I am an X100 fan. I have owned the X100 and X100S and acquired the X100V briefly until the Nikon Z6II arrived. I then returned the X100V and have been using the Z6II ($1900) as the daily driver paired with either Z24-50 or 50/1.8. The size of the z6II/lens was a definite drawback to more quick shots especially with the larger lens combinations. However, I recently purchased the Z-28mm/2.8 cupcake lens ($250) and, I have to say, finally have a setup that really suits my daily photo wants/needs and rivals the X100V compactness. The Nikon Z6II with Z 28/F2.8 actually performs better in my intended daily shooting and casual/travel needs than the Fuji X100V. The user settings (U1, U2, U3) allow for faster/more on the fly configuration changes. In addition, the Z6II has a better performing autofocus and video options. To be sure, my preference for the Nikon Z6II as the daily use platform is in part due to my Nikon bias, shooting 20+ years vice Fuji 10+ years and I recently upgraded from Nikon D700 to Z9 as the main body for events/action/work. By having the daily driver as the Z6II, the menu, layout, ergonomics, workflows and storage issues are same/similar and allow similar tactile feels and movements to capture images. That said, the X100V (and the X100 series), produce the best JPEGs for immediate use in my opinion. Love the color spread. While I love the Fujifilm X100V for what it is and what it does, I finally have a Nikon full format solution that better meets my day to day needs and provides greater creativity options (although at a greater cost/investment).
FujiFilm USA gave me GREAT service: This March I slipped and fell on ice, on top of my almost-new X100V, breaking my ribs and knocking the viewfinder out of alignment. I sent it to their New Jersey repair shop, and they replaced the lens assembly and returned it the day they got the camera. It works perfectly again, and I carry it everywhere. You will enjoy it!
The A7C is the best out of the four taking into account picture quality, battery and stabilization. The Fuji goes second. The Leica is too expensive for what it offers. I've owned the X100F for two years, but now it's being replaced by my new A7C. Although I like Fuji jpgs, the A7C offers better depth of field and better dynamic range. Colors in Sony's new jpgs and Fuji provia are very similar. Of course if you prefer to shoot everything in jpg, the Fuji is your best option. But if you shoot raw, the a7C will be your favorite camera. I also have an A7RII, but I think I'm selling it soon as I've fallen in love with the weight, size and colors of the A7C.
Excellent comments! I guess I'm still married to film and view cameras. I'm too old to switch. But...your endorsement of the A7C is compelling. I'm still trying to wrap my brain around megapixels. Maybe 24mp is more than enough when I consider how I will use the camera (i.e., handheld and sometimes in low light). I might feel a little better about the A7C if it had a 33mp sensor and a 3.68m-Dot EVF. Maybe in the next version? That means I would have to upgrade. Oh well.
For me, the best travel camera is the Sony RX10 IV. Sharp optics, great reach (24-600mm f6.3-f11 FF equivalent), good AF system, excellent video capabilities, quiet leaf shutter (also great for flash photography), nice background blur for portraits, weather sealing and the stacked 1“ sensor still is very competitive.
I shoot street photos with my X 100f and I prefer the all black model as it is less conspicuous than the chrome jobbie. It also resembles more a smart phone, like the model of phone I have; disguise can be handy in the streets. I know you both aren't fans of street photography. I also use the X 100f as a travel camera and I find one camera/one lens frees me up to take more pictures. Having a fixed lens saves me fiddle time and I become very experienced with what I can and can't not do with the 35mm FF equivalency.
I stopped using my X100F because of the A7C. Then I lost the A7C so I bought and A7SIII, sold my X100F and got an Fuji X100V. It's awesome and you'll love it.
I have the Sony a7C that I go everywhere with. I think the problem most people will have with it is that even though the body is compact, its full frame sensor means having to either 1) keep a large heavy zoom lens on it like I do or 2) carry a bunch of primes. Either of those can be inconvenient for run-and-gun traveling, depending on the person or the trip. I always have a large heavy 24-105mm f/4 on it because I hate changing lenses and I don't mind the weight, but this is just something to keep in mind.
Absolutely man! I know it’s not exactly defined as a street only camera but I recently picked up the Sony A7C to go alongside my X100V and oh boy what a street cam at night. With the ibis and high iso performance I can get shots at night that my fuji simply can not get. But again, to different applications and super happy with both of them
Great point! I went with the Tamron 28-200 for the A7C which is a little off-balance but a great option when you just don't want to fuss with switching primes. Other than that I'm happy to see Sigma and Sony have been showing a lot of love to compact full-frame zoom/prime lenses for Sony E mount lately!
@@razone5947 Totally agree, I got the same lens on a A7RII. Awesome setup, and this lens is amazingly sharp for the price, I wouldn't think of any other lens. With A7RII it's a perfect balance IMO. I am looking for a wearable camera strap to use it when I am cycling.
@@halvorevensen1840 The 20mm f/1.8 is also an amazing little lens that handles perfectly on the A7C and is a little bit nicer than the compact primes, IMO.
Enjoyed this video...liked the delivery style. You don't need expensive gear to do "Snapshot Photography". Put a used Canon Powershot GX9 in your pocket and do a retake. Thanks for the video and leave your backpack, lenses, tripods and flash at home ...your companions will thank you. Continue using your Smartphone, you own it and always have it with you (best camera). Skip the post processing...raw, Photoshop, and Lightroom. Think of your photo audience, who is interested in a photo of a door, not your family, relatives or friends. Smartphones are the remaining point and shoot cameras.
@@PinkBlueStripe That's OK. It's just that I can't imagine spending all that money on a camera just to know that you have a Leica. But to each his own!
i have both sony RX100 and fuji x100v, i think it's a great combo and fits in a small bag when going out. ONLY lightweight can make you feel you wanna go out and shoot.
@@davidm5790 depends on your preference. Most phone cameras are around 28 so I think a lot of people are comfortable with that as an all around. Battery is rough though.
Somewhat random selection of the featured cameras, but for everyone, whatever floats his boat, I use a little Canon M100 with 22mm f/2 STM lens as my walkaround camera combo, cost next to nothing, while brings me joy every time.
3 года назад+1
That is a lovely setup! I too have used it, even if I later replaced it with an M6
I agree -- I would not buy any of the 4 cameras she reviewed, and if I was given one as a gift I would sell it to KEH the same week. As for that Leica, you've got to be kidding. We could remodel the bathroom for that kind of money. The M100 is a great lightweight choice for a compact camera, even with the kit lens, and has the APS-C sensor. And for an even smaller choice, the Canon G5X II is a great option. It fits right in your pocket. I think that T and C have an attraction to the "retro" look and feel, but no thanks. Been there and done that. The little M100 with its touch screen control is exactly what I like.
3 года назад+1
@@timothylatour4977 It really is such a nice little camera, perfect for what it is
I own the Fuji X100V , I really agree you should upgrade from the F to the V (different sensor, tilt lcd, better focus, updated lens etc...). And you did not mention, but the Fuji X100 has a leaf shutter, so you can use the flash at whatever SS ! amazing feature !!
Overall the V is definitely an upgrade and the lens alone makes it almost a must-have. The original X100 lens was made for a 12mp sensor and does not hold up well on the 24mp sensor. The V's lens makes a gigantic difference. However I do think it's worth noting that the sensor _isn't_ an upgrade. The 26mp sensor is cleaner and has more DR at base ISO, yes, but at ISO 800 and upwards it has _more_ noise and from ISO 1600 it has less DR, too. I wish Fuji had not waited so long to update the lens because the V's lens on the F's sensor would be the best travel option.
Also, the compact Sony camera to have considered would have been RX100 m7, with its stunning 24-200 versatility, and a pop up EVF, all while sporting the top of its game autofocus performance.
That zoom versatility came at the cost of max aperture and the built in ND filter. Wish they kept up a parallel line with the same lens setup as the older models but with the updated processor/autofocus.
Good call Chelsea. I have a D750 and the 2.8 zooms, and am now looking for a compact travel camera. You've convinced me that the X100V is the one to get...
I am missing the Ricoh GR3 in this list. I have owned the x100F, x100v, the Q1 and use the ZV1 and Ricoh gr3 side to side. The GR is in my opinion has a better sensor than the Fuji’s. And a better ergonomics and feel than the Zv1.
Just tripped across this video. For someone who like stills over video, the RX100M7 would have been a better compact Sony. Controls are better, the EVF, and longer reach for travel work. The fact that the ZV1 is her personal camera shows that she appreciates it, but the ZV1 is most definitely a better video camera. I own both the ZV1 and RX100M7. Great rigs.
@@alanc6416 I will go a step further and say that in many cases APS-C cameras are a better choice than a “Full Frame” cameras due to the added weight. I think some people put too much emphasis on the sensor size. Actually excellent images can be obtained on M4/3 or even a camera with a 1” sensor like the Sony in this comparison. I have printed images from a cell phone at 8x10 with good results. Most people are just posting on social media so in most cases a decent cell phone camera will do just fine.
@@JHuffPhoto APS-C isn't lighter any more. Cameras like the Fuji X-T4 and Pro3 have become just as heavy as things like the Canon R and Nikon Z, or rather, Fuji got heavier while Canon and Nikon both got lighter, and now they're all around the same weight that Sony has been at since their second generation. So there's no weight saving in APS-C bodies. There _should_ be weight saving in APS-C lenses but the only company making really top-quality APS-C lenses is once again Fuji and they over-engineer their lenses to cover an APS-H frame, making them just as heavy/large or in some cases heavier/larger than the FF equivalents. They put out a 27mm f/2.2 equivalent with a 62mm filter thread the same day Cosina announce a 28mm f/2 with a 39mm thread size... sure, Sony and Canon have their APS-C systems too but their APS-C-speciifc lens selections are more limited and nowhere near the sort of quality we're talking about here. 4/3rds has managed to remain smaller and lighter but development for that mount has also mostly stalled and if you have much need to shoot at high ISO then it's not viable. APS-C started off being smaller and lighter but it hasn't stayed that way. FF started much bigger with SLRs but now is the same size as APS-C, so... nope, might as well scrap APS-C, really. With camera bodies like the EOS RP out there, weighing 2/3rds what an equivalent APS-C body does, there's really no good reason for these smaller sensors to continue. Getting a bigger sensor in a small body is not a problem any more. And I say that even as someone who mostly shoots Fuji.
@@sebastianmatthews1663 while I agree that the weight savings are not as great as they could be there is also a significant cost savings with many APS-C systems like the Fujifilm X series. When I was looking into the Sony system a few years ago I found that comparing apples to apples there was a significant difference in cost to go with the Sony A7iii vs the Fuji X series cameras. Not only in the cost of the body but also in the lenses. Now if you are obsessed with bokeh and always shoot everything wide open to get that blurry background then a camera with a bigger sensor may be appropriate for you but for me personally the sensor size of the camera is not the first things that I worry about. I am usually concerned more with the overall handling and ergonomics. It really is about being inspired to make art.
Sony a7C for travel and general use and Sony RX100 M7 for places you cannot enter with a full-body camera such as concerts, festivals, etc. That would be the perfect combo imho.
You have to get the Fuji X-Pro3. It works just like the 100V including the hybrid viewfinder. It allows you to use interchangeable Fuji X lenses and vintage ones with adapter. Some of which are very compact. I had the 100F and returned it for the X-Pro 3 and it’s such a joy to use. Food for though! By the way, you two peeps are awesome!
The Pro3 is also a lot bigger, heavier, has a less-convenient rear screen and none of the equivalent compact lenses it has access to (18mm f/2, 23mm f/2, 27mm f/2.8) are anywhere near as optically consistent across the frame, _and_ it's missing the leaf shutter. The X100 and X-Pro are cameras you get alongside each other; one does not replace the other.
I got rid of my old X100, and sooooo miss it. It was my first real digital camera, and it was just so much fun to use, and always have around. I traded up for a XT3 interchangeable lens body, and while great to use, with lenses that were really nice (the 16mm was awesone), it just wasn't as fun to shoot and have around. So I just sold the whole kit (KEH) and am going back to the start of my Fuji experience with another X100(v this time).
I like one that actually fits in my jean pockets...The Nikon Coolpix A...APS-C sensor...a D-7000 processor..18.5mm 28mm full-frame equivalent....16 megapixels....Nikon really messed up when they stopped producing these and never made a newer improved model...This little camera at least for me is perfect...A whole lot easier to carry than my Canon 5D!
You made a good choice Fujifilm X100V. I would pick it anytime. Fuji film simulation is great, they have improve 23mm ver II sharper, tild screen is very useful. The Sony a7C has few flaws such as small viewfinder, old menu system quite mess up and not updated and Leica M9-P is old out of dated despite of its beautiful look and design.
Sony a7iii owner here. Sony's great for professional work but the film simulations or the ability to set your own makes the fujifilm camera such a fun tool and thats why I bought one
Haha! I am watching this because today I came across a very nicely priced M9. However in exchange I have to sell some of my Fujifilm gear including X100F, X-E4, and XF 23/1.4 and XF 35/2. I already have a Summicron 35 V4 to go with M9. But nah, no, I will keep my Fujifilm stash (also including an X-T1, 56/1.2, 14/2.8 and 135/2)... M9 is only attractive because of the CCD sensor, but otherwise I think Fujifilm cameras give me everything and more a Leica can give, thank you. Fujifilm rocks!
I’ve had the X100F and the X100V and the V is much much better. I also shoot Sony ILCs so I think the A7C is cool, but priced a little too high imo. The only other fixed lens camera I would consider is the Ricoh GR, but I think the Fuji is still the best choice.
I know its a lot more work to produce videos like this, compared to the "Breaking News" piece that Tony posted yesterday, but this is where you guys really really shine. Nice Entertaining, informative, and it even got me browsing Leicas at KEH :)
I like them all -- even the "Destroyed!" ones. Almost everything is out of my budget, so it's like watching videos on yachts or jets. Fun but not tempting in the least.
I had a feeling it would be the fuji. For stills, i find fujis fun to shoot with. I generally shoot with a canon. But when i comes to photo walks, the fuji is the one in my hand. Just the right amount of features to keep you thinking and on your feet, and the optic and tactile dials just make it extra fun.
My travel camera is the bigger/heavier Sony RX10 MKIV. It offers a 1 inch sensor and a 24-600mm zoom range, which is ideal for when I'm going to Yellowstone soon. It opens up to f2.8 and 24 MPs (I think).
My camera is the Canon EOS RP. I love using it with my 17-40, 24-105, and 85mm. But for casual compact shooting, I love keeping the RF 35mm macro on by default, love that setup
In the Sony, 24-70mm equivalent and a F1.8-2.8 lens. Is the Aperture equivalent with a 1" sensor or a FF one? Wasn't Tony the one that emphasized that Camera companies like to equate the focal length and then lie on the sensor?
Yes, especially in such comparisons of different cameras with different sensor sizes this is completely misleading. I think the crop factor is 2.6, the full frame equivalent must be therefore f4.7-7.2.
@@dr.rationalist9669 There was almost no mention of sensor sizes. Not a very useful comparison video, but nice to see the CT streets early on a Sunday morning, presumably.
I cannot disagree with the Fuji 100 series. Any of them would have been the right choice. One omission is Leica Q is not included in this comparison. It is a better comparison to the Fuji, full frame, spectacular lens.
Lovely 4K footage guys (finally!) But I really think the RX100VII would have been a better alternative for a photo-centric travel camera in that category (longer focal length + EVF) than the ZVI, which was intended as a travel vlogger travel camera
Nice review. I needed a new ‘compact’ travel camera a couple years back and chose the Olympus pen f. Silver/black. Lots of knobs. Coolness. Small lenses big lenses! Love it.
I use the A7c with the Sigma 30mm as the main camera on my channel. My secondary angle is shot using a6400 with the Sigma 56 mm (I love this lens! 😍) In my first videos, I was using the ZV-1 so feel free to check them out for comparison :)
Kind of a missed opportunity here. A Panasonic GX80 or GX9 with a 12-32 mm lens is fairly cheap when bought used. IBIS and optical stabilisation working together, very compact, and a telezoom for those is small too.
I am using Fuji now, but the a6000 was my first good mirrorless camera. Since then I have tried m43 models and several Fujifilms. If I could have all the experience I have gained trying all these models but go back in time I would save the tons of money spent and simply kept the a 6000 and sigma 45mm f2.8. Also would have the zs1000 I have or a rx100 for the zoom.
Why wouldn’t you consider the RX100 as a travel camera? If your photography-focused, I think it’s a better choice than the ZV-1 (convince me otherwise). It’s got a viewfinder, and if you opt for the M6 or M7, it gives you 200mm of reach, which I love. Personally, I own the Rx100M6, and I like it a lot (bought it used for significantly less than the M7 at the time.. and the budget was a concern for me.. but the improved AF on the M7 makes it better in every way.. at a price) I’m all about zoom lenses because: 1. Sometimes you can’t zoom with your feet and 2. I’m lazy.
This makes sense. I have the ZV-1 and the biggest downside for photography is lack of a viewfinder. The size and weight are really compelling. The ZV-1 is very much like the RX100 minus the viewfinder, so it sounds like an almost perfect choice for a compact camera. That said, haven't tried the Fuji which looks pretty nice :)
I have an rx 100 m3 and unlike dlsrs or even a phone it really seems like people ignore me shooting street photography with it. The somy rx series has some really nice out of camera black and white capability as well.
There is a good reason why it still sells for ~900€ on this side of the pond ;-).
3 года назад
I alternate between a Canon M6 with either the 22mm pancake, or the 15-45 zoom, and a Canon RP with the 45mm. They also share the same battery type, so when I prefer to bring two bodys they work well together.
What a fun video! And information packed. I sometimes get asked about travel cameras and I will forward this video on. My travel kit is the Sony a6600 paired with the 18-135. It’s got image stabilization, has a bit of sealing protection (good for me with beach/sand shots) and the range of 18-135 means I don’t have to change lenses while walking around. I feel you about traveling with others who don’t want to wait around- in my case to swap out lenses. I’ve been super happy with the image quality of this combo. Also more budget friendly. Don’t forget us crop sensor users!
Thank you for this interesting review. I have just bought an EIZO 4k monitor and watching your 4k videos is a joy. The camera I always have on me is the Lumix GX7 with a 1,7/20.
...compact and travel... I'd tend for the Sony ZV-1.. and if it had a pull up and out EVF like you seen in RX and HX models, even better.... I guess it depends on the type of "travel" you do.. if it is on and off buses or cars, and hiking, kids, etc... aka tourist travel I'd do something like the Sony ZV-1... my wife has the Sony HX60 or XH80 and yeah, not the best in terms of senor size and apeture, but so convenient and the optical zoom better than using smart phone..
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Sneaking [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ILUps2zDFU/mqdefault.jpg)
“You know if I made the wrong choice, I can always switch again” -such a perfect Chelsea quote. And of course, Tony should be warned (in more ways than one...)
Great and informative video. As an ex Leica Q2 user I'm very happy with the decision of changing up to the Sony A7C. Yes, I wrote changing up because the A7C is a better camera on literally all aspects except for build quality (although the A7C still have a great build quality, the Q2 is a smidge better). Everyone including me like the picture quality and the sensors of Leica but the Sony FF cameras is on an other level and the stats talk for itself.
Leica is known for being user friendly and that is one of their main strengths that ppl always mention, however I'd say the A7C is even better since it's so easy to get amazin, quick and extremely sharp fokus all day long with it.
The M9 over the Q2 was an interesting choice. Especially going up against other fixed lens cameras.
This video seems like a Keh ad so I’m guessing that it’s what they had in stock.
If they gave her the Q2 instead, she would probably choose the Q2. The M9 is literally released at 2009, it's almost like comparing a feature phone to a smartphone.
The chelseh in this video is off the charts! 🙃
You made the right decision for your declared use case. The 35 lux is amazing but the x100v will take a hell of a beating and still dust it off and fire off more frames ...ask me how I know. Next time around...x100v vs Q2 🥰
This video really speaks to me lol. When saving for a camera last year, I knew compactness was a top priority for me so the release of the Fuji X100V, Fuji X-S10, and Sony A7C in 2020 were super well-timed. I checked all 3 of them out and ultimately decided on the A7C because it has IBIS, long battery life, and a lot of cheap, compact, and well-performing third party lenses to choose from. The ergonomics and film emulation modes of Fuji cameras are still killer though! P.S. I agree that the A7C really shines when used with lenses that have aperture rings on them since it doesn't have a front dial (the new Sigma I series and the Sony 24-40-50 trio for example).
Just got my A7C last week and love it so far! Now to only get to travel some here to take some fun travel photos!
@@MichaelBeaver Absolutely! Can't wait to take the A7C on the road. Hopefully soon!
I love the range-finder style. A7C controls horribly in my opinion not because it lacks dials and buttons, but because it just has some seriously "bruh" things about it. For instance, you can't change settings with the touchscreen. I found myself turning the auto-EVF feature off because I kept triggering it due to its placement, but then every other camera I've ever had (Canon, Olympus, Panasonic) with an EVF, even if you turn the auto-EVF off, the EVF turns itself on when you close the screen. Not so with the A7C. I also don't understand why you need a dedicated exposure compensation dial when you could just use that for a general purpose control dial. That said, I still have it because it's the most image quality out of a compact camera right now, and it's the cheapest full-frame camera that has unlimited 4K video recording. But I feel like you're always fighting the UI to try to reach its maximum potential. I feel like if you gave the hardware to literally any other company, they'd find some way to give the A7C a soul because currently, IMO, it really lacks a soul. Also, I felt it was really uncomfortable to hold, but it's not too bad since I attached a full length plate that gives my pinky a resting place. Good thing it's not my primary camera because I think it's a frustrating camera, and it doesn't need to be.
Why not Fuji XS-10 ?
@@mvhan911 The A7C has better battery life (I’ve never needed to carry a spare with me for all day shooting) and Sony has really great third party lenses. Those were the two main reasons why I didn’t go with the X-S10 even though it looks like a great camera.
Used the X100v for 4 months. Just two limited. The Sony is wondrously adaptable. I am playing with vintage lenses right now and the GM glass is comparable to any glass out there. Switched to the A7C and now it is my main, switched to Sony from Nikon, partly because of the video this channel did on the future of the camera industry. Fuji cameras have the looks but for me just not the legs to go the distance. The x100v is a super fun camera though and ultimately more portable. The A7C's biggest draw back is a lack of truly compact lenses from Sony. But if I were a pro and had a half dozen cameras I would definitely have an x100v. Great review.
Sony shooter here that has a x100V for the small compact camera ! The x100 series is a shooters camera! It is a lot of fun to use and it’s a different world from my work horse.
I hear you about not being able to go slow sometimes! Back when I was in High School _late 1970s_ , all the pictures I took on our Family vacations (with a Canon TX; with it's really actually totally mechanical shutter, advanced needle-and-ring metering system, and the aforementioned manual focusing) had Dad with his mouth open, yelling "Take the picture!" I literally mean ALL the family vacation pictures.
Love my A7C. If Fuji ever wakes up and puts a full frame sensor in the X100 series, let me know 😆 I do a lot of night photography, and the crop sensor can’t hang as well. Also, even the V trails behind the A7C in autofocus speed, and if you’ve got running kids/dogs… you’re gonna miss the shot.
I am an X100 fan. I have owned the X100 and X100S and acquired the X100V briefly until the Nikon Z6II arrived. I then returned the X100V and have been using the Z6II ($1900) as the daily driver paired with either Z24-50 or 50/1.8. The size of the z6II/lens was a definite drawback to more quick shots especially with the larger lens combinations. However, I recently purchased the Z-28mm/2.8 cupcake lens ($250) and, I have to say, finally have a setup that really suits my daily photo wants/needs and rivals the X100V compactness. The Nikon Z6II with Z 28/F2.8 actually performs better in my intended daily shooting and casual/travel needs than the Fuji X100V. The user settings (U1, U2, U3) allow for faster/more on the fly configuration changes. In addition, the Z6II has a better performing autofocus and video options. To be sure, my preference for the Nikon Z6II as the daily use platform is in part due to my Nikon bias, shooting 20+ years vice Fuji 10+ years and I recently upgraded from Nikon D700 to Z9 as the main body for events/action/work. By having the daily driver as the Z6II, the menu, layout, ergonomics, workflows and storage issues are same/similar and allow similar tactile feels and movements to capture images. That said, the X100V (and the X100 series), produce the best JPEGs for immediate use in my opinion. Love the color spread. While I love the Fujifilm X100V for what it is and what it does, I finally have a Nikon full format solution that better meets my day to day needs and provides greater creativity options (although at a greater cost/investment).
FujiFilm USA gave me GREAT service: This March I slipped and fell on ice, on top of my almost-new X100V, breaking my ribs and knocking the viewfinder out of alignment. I sent it to their New Jersey repair shop, and they replaced the lens assembly and returned it the day they got the camera. It works perfectly again, and I carry it everywhere. You will enjoy it!
The A7C is the best out of the four taking into account picture quality, battery and stabilization. The Fuji goes second. The Leica is too expensive for what it offers. I've owned the X100F for two years, but now it's being replaced by my new A7C. Although I like Fuji jpgs, the A7C offers better depth of field and better dynamic range. Colors in Sony's new jpgs and Fuji provia are very similar. Of course if you prefer to shoot everything in jpg, the Fuji is your best option. But if you shoot raw, the a7C will be your favorite camera. I also have an A7RII, but I think I'm selling it soon as I've fallen in love with the weight, size and colors of the A7C.
Excellent comments! I guess I'm still married to film and view cameras. I'm too old to switch. But...your endorsement of the A7C is compelling. I'm still trying to wrap my brain around megapixels. Maybe 24mp is more than enough when I consider how I will use the camera (i.e., handheld and sometimes in low light). I might feel a little better about the A7C if it had a 33mp sensor and a 3.68m-Dot EVF. Maybe in the next version? That means I would have to upgrade. Oh well.
For me, the best travel camera is the Sony RX10 IV. Sharp optics, great reach (24-600mm f6.3-f11 FF equivalent), good AF system, excellent video capabilities, quiet leaf shutter (also great for flash photography), nice background blur for portraits, weather sealing and the stacked 1“ sensor still is very competitive.
I shoot street photos with my X 100f and I prefer the all black model as it is less conspicuous than the chrome jobbie. It also resembles more a smart phone, like the model of phone I have; disguise can be handy in the streets. I know you both aren't fans of street photography. I also use the X 100f as a travel camera and I find one camera/one lens frees me up to take more pictures. Having a fixed lens saves me fiddle time and I become very experienced with what I can and can't not do with the 35mm FF equivalency.
I stopped using my X100F because of the A7C. Then I lost the A7C so I bought and A7SIII, sold my X100F and got an Fuji X100V. It's awesome and you'll love it.
Nice to see you guys talking about different cameras this time, not only Canon, Sony and Nikon. My choice would be the X100V too.
but she start talk about R5 haha R5 look like word morning used every morning :)
I'm not so sure. If you leave out Canon you're leaving out half the choices out there. The camera selection for this video is bizarre.
I have the Sony a7C that I go everywhere with. I think the problem most people will have with it is that even though the body is compact, its full frame sensor means having to either 1) keep a large heavy zoom lens on it like I do or 2) carry a bunch of primes. Either of those can be inconvenient for run-and-gun traveling, depending on the person or the trip. I always have a large heavy 24-105mm f/4 on it because I hate changing lenses and I don't mind the weight, but this is just something to keep in mind.
Absolutely man!
I know it’s not exactly defined as a street only camera but I recently picked up the Sony A7C to go alongside my X100V and oh boy what a street cam at night. With the ibis and high iso performance I can get shots at night that my fuji simply can not get. But again, to different applications and super happy with both of them
Great point! I went with the Tamron 28-200 for the A7C which is a little off-balance but a great option when you just don't want to fuss with switching primes. Other than that I'm happy to see Sigma and Sony have been showing a lot of love to compact full-frame zoom/prime lenses for Sony E mount lately!
@@razone5947 for sure! those 24,40 and 50 will be a lethal combo with this small A7C
@@razone5947 Totally agree, I got the same lens on a A7RII. Awesome setup, and this lens is amazingly sharp for the price, I wouldn't think of any other lens. With A7RII it's a perfect balance IMO. I am looking for a wearable camera strap to use it when I am cycling.
@@halvorevensen1840 The 20mm f/1.8 is also an amazing little lens that handles perfectly on the A7C and is a little bit nicer than the compact primes, IMO.
Canon M6 Mark II has been a phenomenal travel camera for me from going across the world to backpacking in the Rocky Mountains.
A pleasant lady with good info to which I can relate. It is evident that she is an actual photographer that enjoys taking photos.
Yes, she is.
Slow focus on any brand : Bad. Leica : Good. 🤔
the focus on a leica is as fast as the shooter makes it.
And the Q and the Q2, which admittedly they should have had instead of the M9P, actually have really fast autofocus.
Try zone focusing with leica manual focus lens, u can probably focus faster than your sony a7r4
If you want a more compact 35 mm for the a7c, try the Sony/Zeiss 35/2.8. Great lens and more compact than the Samyang.
Enjoyed this video...liked the delivery style. You don't need expensive gear to do "Snapshot Photography". Put a used Canon Powershot GX9 in your pocket and do a retake. Thanks for the video and leave your backpack, lenses, tripods and flash at home ...your companions will thank you. Continue using your Smartphone, you own it and always have it with you (best camera). Skip the post processing...raw, Photoshop, and Lightroom. Think of your photo audience, who is interested in a photo of a door, not your family, relatives or friends. Smartphones are the remaining point and shoot cameras.
I love my X100V. Can’t wait to see any and all future content that pairs you with that beautiful camera. Happy shooting!
though slightly older, still love my Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 as well. Versatile, proper Zoom lens, can shoot manual and automatic
Leica Q2 and the Ricoh GRiii
Love my Fuji, too. To scratch my Leica itch I have the M8 in the same bag. There’s no logic to it but camera love - must be Polycamerous!!
Do you wear a Rolex watch to tell time? Having a Leica is kind of the same thing, isn't it?
@@timothylatour4977 Tools of the day. Rangefinders aren’t for all. I enjoy the slower pace.
@@PinkBlueStripe That's OK. It's just that I can't imagine spending all that money on a camera just to know that you have a Leica. But to each his own!
@@timothylatour4977 It was a charity shop repair. Took me 8 months to get it going.
i have both sony RX100 and fuji x100v, i think it's a great combo and fits in a small bag when going out. ONLY lightweight can make you feel you wanna go out and shoot.
Would be interested to se the GR 3 in there
Used them all. G3 is the best secret.
28mm isn’t all purpose though. Good for street but not all around. That battery is killer too
@@davidm5790 depends on your preference. Most phone cameras are around 28 so I think a lot of people are comfortable with that as an all around. Battery is rough though.
@@davidm5790 even though I use and root for the gr3, you’re right. Canon elph then 🥳🤣
It would have been Great but they don't appreciate Ricoh/Pentax that much.
Somewhat random selection of the featured cameras, but for everyone, whatever floats his boat, I use a little Canon M100 with 22mm f/2 STM lens as my walkaround camera combo, cost next to nothing, while brings me joy every time.
That is a lovely setup! I too have used it, even if I later replaced it with an M6
I agree -- I would not buy any of the 4 cameras she reviewed, and if I was given one as a gift I would sell it to KEH the same week. As for that Leica, you've got to be kidding. We could remodel the bathroom for that kind of money.
The M100 is a great lightweight choice for a compact camera, even with the kit lens, and has the APS-C sensor. And for an even smaller choice, the Canon G5X II is a great option. It fits right in your pocket. I think that T and C have an attraction to the "retro" look and feel, but no thanks. Been there and done that. The little M100 with its touch screen control is exactly what I like.
@@timothylatour4977 It really is such a nice little camera, perfect for what it is
@ Yes, it is a nice little camera. I like carrying it out to the park instead of lugging my Canon 5D or even my Rebel SL2.
The canon m6ii with the 22mm pancake is another great option.
I own the Fuji X100V , I really agree you should upgrade from the F to the V (different sensor, tilt lcd, better focus, updated lens etc...). And you did not mention, but the Fuji X100 has a leaf shutter, so you can use the flash at whatever SS ! amazing feature !!
Overall the V is definitely an upgrade and the lens alone makes it almost a must-have. The original X100 lens was made for a 12mp sensor and does not hold up well on the 24mp sensor. The V's lens makes a gigantic difference.
However I do think it's worth noting that the sensor _isn't_ an upgrade. The 26mp sensor is cleaner and has more DR at base ISO, yes, but at ISO 800 and upwards it has _more_ noise and from ISO 1600 it has less DR, too. I wish Fuji had not waited so long to update the lens because the V's lens on the F's sensor would be the best travel option.
I just made the same choice. Getting mine today!
Also, the compact Sony camera to have considered would have been RX100 m7, with its stunning 24-200 versatility, and a pop up EVF, all while sporting the top of its game autofocus performance.
That zoom versatility came at the cost of max aperture and the built in ND filter. Wish they kept up a parallel line with the same lens setup as the older models but with the updated processor/autofocus.
Good call Chelsea. I have a D750 and the 2.8 zooms, and am now looking for a compact travel camera. You've convinced me that the X100V is the one to get...
Plus leaf shutter, plus built in ND filter, plus updated lens, plus it's cool looking! That's a lot of pluses in my book!
I am missing the Ricoh GR3 in this list. I have owned the x100F, x100v, the Q1 and use the ZV1 and Ricoh gr3 side to side. The GR is in my opinion has a better sensor than the Fuji’s. And a better ergonomics and feel than the Zv1.
Just tripped across this video. For someone who like stills over video, the RX100M7 would have been a better compact Sony. Controls are better, the EVF, and longer reach for travel work. The fact that the ZV1 is her personal camera shows that she appreciates it, but the ZV1 is most definitely a better video camera. I own both the ZV1 and RX100M7. Great rigs.
now if someone can make a full frame camera with a fuji vibe 😭
They do. It is called the GFX series of cameras. They have a sensor that is far bigger than so called “full frame.”
@@JHuffPhoto agreed. FF Would be nice but It’s not necessary. Unless you really need the megapixels for clients, in which GFX would be even better
@@alanc6416 I will go a step further and say that in many cases APS-C cameras are a better choice than a “Full Frame” cameras due to the added weight. I think some people put too much emphasis on the sensor size. Actually excellent images can be obtained on M4/3 or even a camera with a 1” sensor like the Sony in this comparison. I have printed images from a cell phone at 8x10 with good results. Most people are just posting on social media so in most cases a decent cell phone camera will do just fine.
@@JHuffPhoto APS-C isn't lighter any more. Cameras like the Fuji X-T4 and Pro3 have become just as heavy as things like the Canon R and Nikon Z, or rather, Fuji got heavier while Canon and Nikon both got lighter, and now they're all around the same weight that Sony has been at since their second generation. So there's no weight saving in APS-C bodies.
There _should_ be weight saving in APS-C lenses but the only company making really top-quality APS-C lenses is once again Fuji and they over-engineer their lenses to cover an APS-H frame, making them just as heavy/large or in some cases heavier/larger than the FF equivalents. They put out a 27mm f/2.2 equivalent with a 62mm filter thread the same day Cosina announce a 28mm f/2 with a 39mm thread size... sure, Sony and Canon have their APS-C systems too but their APS-C-speciifc lens selections are more limited and nowhere near the sort of quality we're talking about here.
4/3rds has managed to remain smaller and lighter but development for that mount has also mostly stalled and if you have much need to shoot at high ISO then it's not viable. APS-C started off being smaller and lighter but it hasn't stayed that way. FF started much bigger with SLRs but now is the same size as APS-C, so... nope, might as well scrap APS-C, really. With camera bodies like the EOS RP out there, weighing 2/3rds what an equivalent APS-C body does, there's really no good reason for these smaller sensors to continue. Getting a bigger sensor in a small body is not a problem any more. And I say that even as someone who mostly shoots Fuji.
@@sebastianmatthews1663 while I agree that the weight savings are not as great as they could be there is also a significant cost savings with many APS-C systems like the Fujifilm X series. When I was looking into the Sony system a few years ago I found that comparing apples to apples there was a significant difference in cost to go with the Sony A7iii vs the Fuji X series cameras. Not only in the cost of the body but also in the lenses. Now if you are obsessed with bokeh and always shoot everything wide open to get that blurry background then a camera with a bigger sensor may be appropriate for you but for me personally the sensor size of the camera is not the first things that I worry about. I am usually concerned more with the overall handling and ergonomics. It really is about being inspired to make art.
Good decision. For a second or third camera you do not need more lens choices. X100V is a perfect camera.
Sony a7C for travel and general use and Sony RX100 M7 for places you cannot enter with a full-body camera such as concerts, festivals, etc. That would be the perfect combo imho.
Putting a grip on the Sony ZV-1 improves the experience, giving you more to hold. Ulanzi and Smallrig both make nice ones :)
The small rig cage with the wooden grip is nice to hold
still love my panasonic LX-10
Good choice 👍 Chelsea. The x100v is my compact choice. I have had it for a year, no regrets. The instax printer 🖨 is fun to use with the x100v.
Great choice. Traveling is made to have fun, so it's logic to pick the camera you have the most fun with.
You have to get the Fuji X-Pro3. It works just like the 100V including the hybrid viewfinder. It allows you to use interchangeable Fuji X lenses and vintage ones with adapter. Some of which are very compact. I had the 100F and returned it for the X-Pro 3 and it’s such a joy to use. Food for though! By the way, you two peeps are awesome!
Did you forget this video was about travel cameras?
The Pro3 is also a lot bigger, heavier, has a less-convenient rear screen and none of the equivalent compact lenses it has access to (18mm f/2, 23mm f/2, 27mm f/2.8) are anywhere near as optically consistent across the frame, _and_ it's missing the leaf shutter.
The X100 and X-Pro are cameras you get alongside each other; one does not replace the other.
or an X-E4?
I have the X100, if you are on a budget it's a brilliant option.
I love my Leica M9-P. Will keep it till it crumbles. Nice to see it getting some attention in 2021.
The Leica Q2 is the dream camera that fits the bill!!
Lovely footage of Chelsea. Camera & lens?
Hi Hugh! It's the a7S III + 24 f1.4 GM on a gimbal. Miss you!
I got rid of my old X100, and sooooo miss it. It was my first real digital camera, and it was just so much fun to use, and always have around. I traded up for a XT3 interchangeable lens body, and while great to use, with lenses that were really nice (the 16mm was awesone), it just wasn't as fun to shoot and have around. So I just sold the whole kit (KEH) and am going back to the start of my Fuji experience with another X100(v this time).
You should get your hands on the Ricoh GR3. You'll love it!
I like one that actually fits in my jean pockets...The Nikon Coolpix A...APS-C sensor...a D-7000 processor..18.5mm 28mm full-frame equivalent....16 megapixels....Nikon really messed up when they stopped producing these and never made a newer improved model...This little camera at least for me is perfect...A whole lot easier to carry than my Canon 5D!
I love you Chelsea. Such a sweet and warm person. Wish you all the best.
You made a good choice Fujifilm X100V. I would pick it anytime. Fuji film simulation is great, they have improve 23mm ver II sharper, tild screen is very useful. The Sony a7C has few flaws such as small viewfinder, old menu system quite mess up and not updated and Leica M9-P is old out of dated despite of its beautiful look and design.
I love the use of the word “polycamerous.”
Yes I do believe you and your Fuji look real cute together.
Sony a7iii owner here. Sony's great for professional work but the film simulations or the ability to set your own makes the fujifilm camera such a fun tool and thats why I bought one
I had the 100v but switched back to Nikon and for my travel camera I bought the Z50 and love it. Fits in my hands much better than the Fuji.
Haha! I am watching this because today I came across a very nicely priced M9. However in exchange I have to sell some of my Fujifilm gear including X100F, X-E4, and XF 23/1.4 and XF 35/2. I already have a Summicron 35 V4 to go with M9. But nah, no, I will keep my Fujifilm stash (also including an X-T1, 56/1.2, 14/2.8 and 135/2)... M9 is only attractive because of the CCD sensor, but otherwise I think Fujifilm cameras give me everything and more a Leica can give, thank you. Fujifilm rocks!
Hey guys, you totally omitted the Sony a6xxx cameras!
Video quality looked fantastic on my big screen. thank you
What camera was used to shoot this video
Love m my silver x100v, definitely my favorite camera
Nice to see that you love the ovf of de fujifilm. Not everybody like it and they use the evf instead.
Good choice! X100V is great! Waterproof, sharper lens for close up, articulating screen. What about Ricoh GR III?
I’ve had the X100F and the X100V and the V is much much better. I also shoot Sony ILCs so I think the A7C is cool, but priced a little too high imo. The only other fixed lens camera I would consider is the Ricoh GR, but I think the Fuji is still the best choice.
x100v is also my choice until I can afford a q2! great video on a realistic photographer dilemma
My small compact "travel" camera is a Sony a6600 because it's a great camera and can use all of my Sony lenses..
I know its a lot more work to produce videos like this, compared to the "Breaking News" piece that Tony posted yesterday, but this is where you guys really really shine. Nice Entertaining, informative, and it even got me browsing Leicas at KEH :)
I like them all -- even the "Destroyed!" ones. Almost everything is out of my budget, so it's like watching videos on yachts or jets. Fun but not tempting in the least.
I had a feeling it would be the fuji. For stills, i find fujis fun to shoot with. I generally shoot with a canon. But when i comes to photo walks, the fuji is the one in my hand. Just the right amount of features to keep you thinking and on your feet, and the optic and tactile dials just make it extra fun.
My travel camera is the bigger/heavier Sony RX10 MKIV. It offers a 1 inch sensor and a 24-600mm zoom range, which is ideal for when I'm going to Yellowstone soon. It opens up to f2.8 and 24 MPs (I think).
Very helpful and lovely comparison. Thanks.
My camera is the Canon EOS RP. I love using it with my 17-40, 24-105, and 85mm. But for casual compact shooting, I love keeping the RF 35mm macro on by default, love that setup
I just mount an RF 35mm f1.8 or RF 50mm f1.8 to my R5 for an excellent compact camera user experience while maintaining all the advantages of the R5.
Good choice of the Fuji.... I'm also looking for a street compact camera and I keep going back to the Fuji X100V.
In the Sony, 24-70mm equivalent and a F1.8-2.8 lens. Is the Aperture equivalent with a 1" sensor or a FF one? Wasn't Tony the one that emphasized that Camera companies like to equate the focal length and then lie on the sensor?
Yes, especially in such comparisons of different cameras with different sensor sizes this is completely misleading. I think the crop factor is 2.6, the full frame equivalent must be therefore f4.7-7.2.
@@dr.rationalist9669 There was almost no mention of sensor sizes. Not a very useful comparison video, but nice to see the CT streets early on a Sunday morning, presumably.
I cannot disagree with the Fuji 100 series. Any of them would have been the right choice. One omission is Leica Q is not included in this comparison. It is a better comparison to the Fuji, full frame, spectacular lens.
I think depends on what your picture use for, if photo just for social media, zv1 probably the best one.
Fujifilm X-T20 with 27mm f/2.8 pancake has become my walk-around. (41 mm equiv). Thanks for the video Chelsea!
Cool. It’s actually helpful to break up the 4 cameras into 2 brackets.
Definetly love the asthetic of Fuji X100f
Lovely 4K footage guys (finally!) But I really think the RX100VII would have been a better alternative for a photo-centric travel camera in that category (longer focal length + EVF) than the ZVI, which was intended as a travel vlogger travel camera
Nice review. I needed a new ‘compact’ travel camera a couple years back and chose the Olympus pen f. Silver/black. Lots of knobs. Coolness. Small lenses big lenses! Love it.
Which camera and lens was this video shot with, as the quality looks great.
The Panasonic GX9 with the 15mm f1.7 Leica is a great option too at less than half the price of the Fuji and third the price of the Sony.
Great choice! I own the x100v and I love it 😍😉
Chelsea, I'm French and the way you said "je ne sais quoi" at 6:45 sounded really nice. I'm sure you could learn the language well.🙂
I'm a native french speaker too and noticed the same. It becomes sexy words with such a charming accent.
I use the A7c with the Sigma 30mm as the main camera on my channel.
My secondary angle is shot using a6400 with the Sigma 56 mm (I love this lens! 😍)
In my first videos, I was using the ZV-1 so feel free to check them out for comparison :)
Very nice thank u mam Chelsea. If it's comes to photography and camera reviews you 2 guys I trust the most sir Tony and mam Chelsea.
Dear Chelsea, the Panasonic LX-100II could be in the list no?
Ricoh G3 ftw
Kind of a missed opportunity here. A Panasonic GX80 or GX9 with a 12-32 mm lens is fairly cheap when bought used. IBIS and optical stabilisation working together, very compact, and a telezoom for those is small too.
a6000 is still amazing... Don't need them all...
I am using Fuji now, but the a6000 was my first good mirrorless camera. Since then I have tried m43 models and several Fujifilms. If I could have all the experience I have gained trying all these models but go back in time I would save the tons of money spent and simply kept the a 6000 and sigma 45mm f2.8. Also would have the zs1000 I have or a rx100 for the zoom.
Why wouldn’t you consider the RX100 as a travel camera? If your photography-focused, I think it’s a better choice than the ZV-1 (convince me otherwise). It’s got a viewfinder, and if you opt for the M6 or M7, it gives you 200mm of reach, which I love.
Personally, I own the Rx100M6, and I like it a lot (bought it used for significantly less than the M7 at the time.. and the budget was a concern for me.. but the improved AF on the M7 makes it better in every way.. at a price)
I’m all about zoom lenses because: 1. Sometimes you can’t zoom with your feet and 2. I’m lazy.
This makes sense. I have the ZV-1 and the biggest downside for photography is lack of a viewfinder. The size and weight are really compelling. The ZV-1 is very much like the RX100 minus the viewfinder, so it sounds like an almost perfect choice for a compact camera. That said, haven't tried the Fuji which looks pretty nice :)
Great reviews! What body/lens was THIS shot with?
Still using my Sony RX100V for travel. Don’t see the advantage of upgrading yet
I have an rx 100 m3 and unlike dlsrs or even a phone it really seems like people ignore me shooting street photography with it. The somy rx series has some really nice out of camera black and white capability as well.
There is a good reason why it still sells for ~900€ on this side of the pond ;-).
I alternate between a Canon M6 with either the 22mm pancake, or the 15-45 zoom, and a Canon RP with the 45mm. They also share the same battery type, so when I prefer to bring two bodys they work well together.
What a fun video! And information packed. I sometimes get asked about travel cameras and I will forward this video on. My travel kit is the Sony a6600 paired with the 18-135. It’s got image stabilization, has a bit of sealing protection (good for me with beach/sand shots) and the range of 18-135 means I don’t have to change lenses while walking around. I feel you about traveling with others who don’t want to wait around- in my case to swap out lenses. I’ve been super happy with the image quality of this combo. Also more budget friendly. Don’t forget us crop sensor users!
Thank you for this interesting review. I have just bought an EIZO 4k monitor and watching your 4k videos is a joy. The camera I always have on me is the Lumix GX7 with a 1,7/20.
...compact and travel... I'd tend for the Sony ZV-1.. and if it had a pull up and out EVF like you seen in RX and HX models, even better.... I guess it depends on the type of "travel" you do.. if it is on and off buses or cars, and hiking, kids, etc... aka tourist travel I'd do something like the Sony ZV-1... my wife has the Sony HX60 or XH80 and yeah, not the best in terms of senor size and apeture, but so convenient and the optical zoom better than using smart phone..