@@ashamahee Cmon it's not as bad as ubi. They still pulled half a billion from the game initial sales. Their games are not the best but it's still enjoyable for some people
@@Krasses they have most likely and probably with 90% certainty killed all potential for future profit with the shenanigans they have pulled off with Starfield and how they "updated" their older titles and left them broken after their so called next gen patches messed up the game. UBI had several different IP's so for them it should have been relatively straight forward to churn out sequel after sequel as they had universes for everyone but decided to get so insanely greedy that they achieved the seemingly impossible.
@@Krasses Valhalla and Oddsey is not as destructive as Starfield at launch. I dont like Ubisoft but their AC for Valhalla and Oddsey still good. God Forbid Cyberpunk release DLC that include new companion system because that absolutely goin to trash Starfield at its core level in their own expertise.
@@ashamahee I realized that Starfield killed my hype for any of their games after this. It isn't that immersive. I still felt like it's Skyrim in space. They are probably going for ES6 next, and I'm thinking it would be just be another Skyrim. I mean Skyrim is great but they should let it die.
@Vult_Ira317 Seriously, people are still saying to buy the goty edition and not the latest anniversary cause it somehow broke modding. So the new team can't even port like the old one, what hope is there for ES6?
i hope youre aware that it is because of Modders that Bethesda as a company even exist and the main reason why they dont make quality games. i mean why make quality when modders fixes the problem, for free.
For context, Far Harbor, Fallout 4’s best DLC, was priced at $15 at launch. It featured over 30 quests, a new companion, new settlement items, new weapons, and a better written story than the base game. Bethesda has been falling off for years. This is just the newest drop.
Amd the sad part is Far harbor maind quest is a copy paste from fallout 4 main quest and is also a copy paste from fallout 3 main quest and Point Lockout
@@millerrepin4452 Everything went downhill after fallout 76 released. People even laughed how bad it was, they just kept screwing people over again and again. They couldn't even give people who paid a crazy amount of money proper...bags. Like actual bags, irl, that they ordered. They bait and switched literal bags because they were so cheap. Something happened to Bethesda during that time.
Crazy that in the Witcher 3 30 dollars were blood and wine and hearts of stone, which if you play normally maybe you'll have 20-30 hours doing most main quests and if play doing everything maybe 60 hours...
@@PierceMD me to mate, but I know there are ppl who probably just rush the main quests so, but in blood and wine I've spent maybe 50 hours only looking the landscape
0:46 Let's be honest, the only reason that many people are still playing Fallout 4 is because they're running the Fallout London conversion, which is actually good.
Ahhhh, I'm replaying GoW 2018 and Ragnarok with my girlfriend. She's not a gamer but loves watching me play, and is amazed at how good a video game can be. Kratos, Mimir, Odin, Brok, so many good lines. I'd say your quote fits perfect
@@OilFreeFeathers upset that kratos is now focused on being a dad instead of a full fledged murder machine? 5 murder games should have been enough, now it's story focus time
A spanish streamer was sponsored to play the DLC. At the end of the two hours gameplay, while fighting some enemy, he get shot and died. The game saved in the process of getting shot, so the game was in a loop of reload, get shot, reload, get shot....
Месяц назад+2
That happened to me back then.... when I was playing old games with manual quick saves. So that was my fault. But that's insane a game autosaves in a situation likes that!
@@TheMasterblahYou mean starfield gave you a procedurally generated city and an empty barren planet for you to do absolutely nothing? Yeah I'd settle with dragonborn. It actually has substance and good lore to it
@@chinchilla5162 yeah, Stargield was definitely their last cheque because it was essentially a cash grab that worked due to the amazing marketing they made to misguide people.. but now people are aware of all this.. if bethesda doesnt pull some innovative shii on ES6. They are doomed.
Wait, hold on. If I'm understanding your comment correctly, then I misunderstood prices because I'm not in on the whole starfield thing, but what is the price of the base game? I thought the 30$ WAS the base game and the dlc had some other price
@@MeadowStargazer If that is true, then it would've been linked to Andreja better. It is her home planet Edit: Well judging by MrMattyPlays tweet, it doesnt relate to her at all. So its not really base game
@@addaedansexcept that shouldn't be true because it was pre sold in advance. If you say 'They could've changed plans'that's what they are suggesting, but that it was an unfinished part of what was the original concept but branched it off from there to turn it to dlc. Point being, tone doesn't tell you.
Tes 6 will cost 99$ and it will be basically Starfield but on static map like Skyrim. Generic quests mostly generated by AI, shallow gameplay and same 5 voice actors doing all NPCs in in the entire game.
Such a shame. I regret wasting so much thought over this sequel. I knew it was doomed as soon as they announced Starfield, and I still remember the die-hard defence so many cucks ran for that game before release. - I told em so
This other Garak interaction also fits considering all the lies we get fed by Todd/Bethesda Bashir: But the point is, if you lie all the time, nobody's going to believe you, even when you're telling the truth. Garak: Are you sure that's the point, Doctor? Bashir: Of course. What else could it be? Garak: That you should never tell the same lie twice.
@@DM-qd7gw personally I think skyrim is a good game if you just want to mess around, it's definitely not an RPG though lol. better skyrim than starfield, less loading screens
which starfield doesnt really haave at the moment. the CC JUST released not long ago. we have nowhere near the complexity of mods that skyrim has nor mods that varry as much. comparing skyrim to starfield is the WORST take one could possibly ever have
They last like two seconds each. Complaining about loading screens is the most smoothbrained non-criticism of Starfield. It has huge worldbuilding and narrative issues. 2 second loading screens are not its problem.
Bethesda have gone the same was as Ubisoft and Blizzard. The talent all gets replaced by middle managers and HR departments and suddenly they seem unable to produce a good product. Nothing new here, its the managerial economy and its a fate which is rarely escaped by good companies. The creative, talented people all get rewarded by being fired or cancelled and replaced by middle managers. Read 'The Organization Man'
Why are you calling the script extender like its some platform? Most people play skyrim and damn near ever other bethesda game are also using a script extender. Tf your point?
I have a feeling Starfield was already an abandoned product because of the low player numbers, but they were already obligated to make at least the one expansion courtesy of the premium edition so they half-assed this to focus on other projects.
In "I think it was the deep dive" they leaked a section of the video that had working mechs. Dev on it hasnt stopped fully yet, but there is a good chance future dev will get shut down.
@@Panssel It's cursed because they made a shit game, it's that simple. Could they still salvage some of it? It's possible but Bethesda is far too greedy and corporate to do that, I can't see them pulling a No Mans Sky or CyberPunk comeback. No Mans Sky were Indie Devs who genuinely cared about the product, CD Project Red knew they needed to save their reputation and they did. Plus CyberPunk was a great game that was just riddled with bugs and massively imbalanced, it was capable of saving. This game? Honestly, it's so fucking bland, it would literally need years and years of content and enhancements which Bethesda will not deliver. Nobody is going to want to mod a boring game.
@@Panssel Would have helped if they released the modding tools with the game... like they did with previous games. Those being almost a full year late just destroyed any momentum it might have had.
Meanwhile Cyberpunk: Phantom Liberty: - New Zone - Some OP weapons - Banger soundtracks - New story ending (optional) - New robo lady to replace Panam - Some new weapons and signature weapons - New endless side misisons - Max-Tac Rework - Car-combat - An actual new faction
tbf i honestly think the dlc was overprized compared to the base game. the amount of new items was actually small. the amount of dungeons was really small as well. 1 absolutely amazing legacy dungeon yes but otherwise only the left over dungeons..
@@Foatizenknechtl "the amount of new items was actually small" Bruh you didn't play the DLC. Who tf cares about small, optional cave dungeons? They're bad in the base game and they're MUCH better in the DLC. Quantity // Quality. Shadow Keep and Belurat arguably the best Legacy Dungeon they ever made.
The ER DLC was $40. That's 2/3s the price of the original game. It was great and well worth the money, imo, but let's not use sale prices like it's the standard. (The game was 2.5 years old by the time the sale happened and most sales would put base ER around $40. Meaning, together being $80 isn't selling the DLC for $10. It's actually closer to the original $40 price point)
@@mercylavigne The DLC caves are just as bad as the base game caves, imo. I didn't think the base game caves were bad though, so do with that info as you will
I really hope that enough games flop to make it clear to the studios that quality games are the only way forward but game flops will likely just mean layoffs, microtransactions and maybe studio closures.
Part of the problem is the phoenix from the ashes stories of No Man’s Sky and Cyberpunk. Every studio - particularly Bethesda - thinks they can do the same thing. I.e. release the game too early, lock in the cash, spend years improving the game and fans will eventually forgive and forget and, heck, even give you multiple gaming awards for your efforts
Kinda funny that we're at that year when people are not willing to play the new broken game, but are more willing to go back and play old games that were once released as broken but are now fixed.
Can confirm. Still eagerly waiting for Glenmoril to be done. Along with whatever Vicn's current side project is. ("da-c0da", I think it's called? Involves the Numidium somehow.)
Its because Skyrim is a decent game on its own, it doesnt have the core issues Starfield have (constant loading screens, wide as a ocean deep as a puddle etc..). Heck even combat, which is one of Skyrims weakest points, is more enjoyable in Skyrim than in Starfield due to the existence of magic and stealth being more fun. Starfield could easily have been A LOT better, had they went for a more fantasy sci-fi approach (more of a Warhammer 40K vibe, with magic, various races, gods), and focused on making a few very large handcrafted worlds and reducing the amount of loading and the need to travel all the time. Since they werent able to make ship-travel seamless with manual landing and taking off (like No mans sky) they should have just skipped all the ship mechanics and just have it be a fast travel between planets like in Outer Worlds. The game also lacks a unique feel and edge to it, everything, including the factions, are very tame, bland and boring. Soft modern. Basically what the should have gone for was more of a fantasy-sci fi Fallout New Vegas imo.
@@Vikingskog What? Most of the problems Starfield has were present in Skyrim as well. That's the real issue here. Overabundance of loading screens? Check. Wide as an ocean deep as a puddle? Check. Terrible AI? Check. Even when it comes to combat, it's hard to find something they did right. The magic system in Skyrim is the worst it's ever been due to how the level scaling works. And the stealth? Laughably bad. The only reason people like it is because it trivializes much of the combat encounters thanks to the terrible stealth detection. You could headshot a bandit right in front of his compatriots and still remain undetected.
1:07 "How is this the response to the criticism they faced at launch?" Uh, hmm... Maybe, because people kept paying Bethesda to buy and play their game, anyway, in spite of the complaining? Almost like Bethesda is a company, and as such, they pay more attention to their bottom line than to complaints on the Internet. If you want a company to change, you have to hit them where it hurts, and the comments section on Twitter (or r/Bethesda) is not it, Chief. How do people not understand this basic concept?
3 enemy types 2 Non re-skin guns 2 Melees that no one cared about. 1 Non-recolor new space suit Less than a dozen new outfits Less than a dozen new items No new ship parts No new skills No new Companions No new general POIs
-2 new companions..so far -Not just a new planet to explore but a whole new system with several moons to explore. -More than a dozen new outfits. -New player home -4 different variations of new melee weapons, one you get in a legendary when completing a mission -Over 5 new enemy types. so far. - 5 new Va ruun weapons so far The fact that you didnt know about any of this shows you are just like the rest of the trolls, and this creator, you didnt actually play it.
@@SistaCitizen don't waste your time, girl. let's just play and have fun. enjoying your streams btw
Месяц назад
Meanwhile No Man's Sky gets lots of significant updates. For free. I know it's unfair to compare the two, both are space themed, Starfield is more like an action RPG, No Man's Sky is space exploration action adventure sandbox.
Because Bethesda is by far the worst "AAA" game studio in the business. They're somehow a decade+ behind in graphics, facial animations, cutscenes, gunplay and a myriad of other things. And let's not even get started their complete inability to even the slightest bit compelling dialogue and stories. I truly don't understand how or why people but Bethesda games. There's literally nothing they're good at except marketing. Not to mention the game engine is absolutely horrendous. Your character feels like a floating camera with zero weight to it. I am and always will be bewildered as to how Bethesda got as big as they did. I believe if it weren't for the modding community and support then nobody wouldc buy their games. They're just bad. Starfield is without a doubt the most uninspired game I've ever played. The one positive is ship building, which is useless considering "space flight" is essentially just a loading screen.
Exactly how I think. I could write a book with atleast 1000 pages full of problems every single one of their games have. I played all of these games too, even Starfield (kinda forced myself to like it by playing for 80h) and I seriously dont get this cult following. They are still by a technical standpoint in a late Ps3/early Ps4 era but these games atleast always had something about them - exploration in Skyrim for example was really fun at that time - Starfield doesnt even have that. Its just uninspired garbage and Im convinced this is by far the best Bethesda can do. Its not like they havent tried. They are just years behind everyone else. Look at Studios like Fromsoft, Naughty Dog, Rockstar, CDPR, even Guerilla (I dont like Horizon that much but still), Santa Monica, Square Enix, Capcom etc. The list goes on and on. You dont have to like all their games, but you look at their games or even play their games for 5 minutes and you instantly see the mindblowing difference between them and Bethesda. Starfield feels like a Ps3 game remastered with better graphics (the Bethesda meele attack or their character movement says it all). Thats btw the only good thing I have to say about Starfield. Some locations look very cool, but thats it and I lost every hope for a good Elder Scrolls game
Same reason ppl like blizzard….they are an American company….. And they played what they Thought was a good game when they were kids.. Bethesda has always been bad/behind , dragons dogma was way better than Skyrim at the time. At least blizzard can say they were good in the 90s and maybe up to 2008…I like Skyrim and played it a bunch but the MUSIC and environment saved that game, it’s gameplay was terrible, stories were good. But that’s it
They hooked alot of people with skyrim, and some of us just refuse to let go... I don't know if you were there for skyrims original release, but it was an amazing game at that time
Bethesda was my favorite game studio since I was like 17 and started playing Oblivion religiously. I remember how fuckin hyped I was when I watched those men in black cloaks come out on stage and I immediately knew this is TES5 being announced. I watched the first gameplay footage with Todd on stage showing off the new engine and mechanics over and over again anxiously for the next year waiting for it to finally come out. Then I bought my first copy of Skyrim on release day and have bought 5-6 copies on every console other than pc and put 1000s of hours in to it since, literally to this day as I played for about an hour today. Once again, in 2018, I was hyped up again. After nearly a decade, FINALLY, they were announcing the next game. Id been playing ESO since launch at this point and was ready for a new core game. Then I realized they hadnt even started developing it yet.. Its now 6 FUCKIN YEARS LATER AND NOTHING. No gameplay, no nee mechanics, no story leaks, no setting leaks. NOTHING! Then the shit show that is Starfield comes out, and I have realized that the game studio I once adored is gone.. I dont have high hopes for TES6 unfortunately. I hope they surprise me, but I doubt it. Most of the gaming world has been conquered by woke policy, and Bethesda is a shell of what it once was.
yea similar story on my part , whole thing is sad, idk i even lost all hype for tes6 it has been to long time and bethesda ,has done nofting but shit in past decade.
Bethesdas problem isnt because of woke. it is the fact theyve spent a decade deliberatly making bad products. this what happens when a company realises that they dont need to make new games consider that the consumer will buy their re-releases instead. also why make a good product when modders can fix their problem for free. if it wasnt for the modder community their company would go bankrupt years ago for their lack of productivity. when 90% entire productivity line is because of modders you see why their games are the way they are.
@@dendrien DEI, gender ideology and greedy practices are the problem. The good developers have left the company and been replaced with diversity hires who cant do the job, let alone fill the shoes of those who are gone. So yes, it does have to do with woke ideology. Its not the whole problem, but its a major part of it, just like every other studio falling off.
A good friend of mine (of 20 years) is one of those 5,000 people who are playing the Starfield expansion. He is taking the day tomorrow to play Star Wars Outlaws. He said, and I'm not making this up, he said: "It sounds like a pretty good game". Twenty years a friend... and today I learned he is a bot.
I don't really understand why that upsets you. I have friends who like to play golf, I have friends who like to suck dick. I'm not into either of those hobbies myself, but to each their own. I'm not going to join them if they invite me to join those activities, but I'm happy that they're having fun.
Isn't the definition of a bot following the crowd ? Sounds like he's playing the games and making up his own opinion. Quite literally the opposite of a bot.
He just sounds like a casual. I mean casuals usually have idiotic opinions stemming from not even playing games beyond surface level, so it’s not like their views matter.
That "has become" goes back 15-20 years by now. But the same way a dead tree can still stand upright even when it's core is rotten, it took a while for people to notice.
They even messed up the land vehicle, since the mouse is locked to the steering. I swear to god, it's one step forward and a giant backflip backwards with Bethesda
That ending felt unfinished too. not really a spoiler, but you get zero lore on their beliefs, what or who the great serpent is, why they are so extreme and so devoted etc. It's all cause '1 guy said he talked to a snake god 100 years ago'. And the most important missing lore bit, in the base game the pilgrim talked about in his logs how he fought some guy and died over and over (he went in the unity so he kept fighting him in different universes) and it was strongly implied the other person was the OJ varuun founder. I expected some sort of extended lore on the unity, the interactions the founder of the house had with the pilgrim, if the snake god is actually a starborn who started a cult. My friends and I were theory crafting so hard and considering the deep lore of TES, expected some GOOD STUFF here, and we got NOTHING. ZERO. NO EXPLANATION ABOUT ANYTHING. The DLC just randomly ends. No end of DLC loot, no explanation of how things work or happened. and NO CHOICES. It's the same ending no matter what. This was INSANELY BAD just from a lore perspective. In fallout 4, at least the crazies (children of atom) you have unexplained magical effects like radiation not hurting you, and a womens voice whispering to you. That could make you a believer even if it's not explained. In starfield? Do we have a snake talking to us, or some magical powers? Nope. Everything was SPOILERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR a science project gone wrong, experimenting with grav drive tech to move people into a state of limbo like existence. How does that make people worship a serpent god? There's nothing moving them to the cult. The children of atom, she (the voice) talks to you, guides you, makes you powerful somehow. It's enough to hook people into worshipping... I expected the first intro quest to at least let us interact with the snake god somehow during initiation. Or hear him talk to you or give you orders. There was NOTHING.
this was my biggest concern. the steam player count is mostly meaningless, because anyone with game pass is playing it from the Xbox app. But the actual lore being shit is a whole other thing
@@cd.knuckles Gamepass doesn't give you DLCs, people would have to buy them and the very nature of Gamepass means barely anyone buys DLC for games they might lose at some point. So no, not many there are playing it either. It is Steam and Xbox purely.
@@fish5645 so what. If you’re playing on steam you also have to buy the dlcs. Most people were playing the game on gamepass, zero question. Not to mention on Xbox
Starfield: Little to no modding community. Expensive and bug-ridden. Game is deemed by some modders as pointless to mod. OR Fallout 4: Utterly enormous modding community. Multiple mod world constructions, including Fallout London, with Fallout Miami nearing completion, remakes, and continuations of past Fallout games in Fallout 4's engine, all made by fans, including voice auditions they accomplished, coming up with new weapons, enemies, layouts, and beyond that even surpass Bethesda's capabilities. Literally, the game has new content coming out for FREE. Complete Fallout 4 game (especially on sale) is generally cheap and inexpensive and can be modded to anything your heart's content. The game might be 9 years old, but the modding community's sheer size keeps players coming back for more and more. Fallout 4's motto might as well be, "Got a certain issue with the game? Don't worry. There's a mod for it."
It's pointless to mod because at the end of the day, mods wouldn't bring anything into the existing game structure. It's soo lacking in content and underlying mechanics that it's just a glorified game engine demo at that point. It's like saying "mod unreal engine 5's base demo files to add playability", you'd essentially be starting from scratch because there's nothing to build off of, and at that point you might as well make an entirely independent game that isn't a mod at all, or a mod of some other game with actual content and ways to utilize mods. Just think about it, what could you mod into starfield that would be worthwhile? It already has things like owning houses and decorating them, but even that is super boring and useless. It's a place you don't even need to go to, because you already have everything you need on the ship. It's not even worth the time spent decorating because you're not going to spend any time there because there's nothing to do there. And outside of the storyline, it's just the same dozen or so points of interest repeated over and over, that are pretty much entirely meant for farming, which you don't even need to do much of at generated points of interest, because you'll get more than enough resources naturally as you progress. Since there is effectively no real open world, and soo little to do outside of following the storyline missions, there's just nothing worth modding. The only modding that would be worthwhile at that point is something that mods in completely new storylines, with new locations and dialogs. But there is soo few game in starfield, that the amount of modding required to make the world feel lived in and full of things to do, would be like making a completely new game from scratch, and again, at that point you might as well just make a separate game set in its own universe, because the starfield universe is pretty bland. Its entire backstory is people have faster than light drives and occupy a bunch of planets and have some internal conflicts and are finding some alien artifacts. That's as generic as they come. There's no truly unique or riveting store to build off of.
@peoplez129 @cmedtheuniverseofcmed8775 😂😂Bruh wut? There are more mods for Starfield at this time than there was for Fallout and Skyrim at this time for their launch. In fact Elianora and other legendary Fallot and Skyrim modders designed the base game for Starfield. Elianora made all the outpost habs and ship habs for the vanilla game. People swear Fallout and Skyrim at launch were amazing, when the facts are the DLC's and 10 years of updates and mods made both of those games good, otherwise Morrowind and Oblivion will still be banging on the charts.
Bethesda games just rotate through a hate train cycle. When Fallout 4 came out, people were eviscerating it the same way they're doing to Starfield now. "Oh no a voiced protagonist, muh 'mersion! Oh no I can't so sidequests I must find my son! YES, NO, QUESTION, SNARKY YES dialogue wheel". Now people like it? Seems like once ES6 comes out, people will be hating on it and saying how great Starfield was.
@@redemptionjack4657I second this. Fallout 4 was a really good game and I loved it's story and companions and the dialogue as well. Especially the far harbor expansion. Ppl who bash it are hardcore nv fans that prob didn't even play the game
Still, I'm playing Starfield, not Fallout 4. Just started the expansion so I can't really tell what the overall quality is but the first mission has nice atmosphere.
@@redemptionjack4657 Yes they loved the new gameplay most everyone hated/disliked the Story because its predictable being its Fallout 3 story only you the dad this time and because you were somebody taking a lot of the Roleplay out of your character, being Nate the War Criminal or Nora the Lawyer
Quit the video when you claimed there were 0 new companions, there are at least 2 that I know of. But then I didn't try to rush the DLC as quickly as possible just to claim it was short. If you don't like something that's fine, but if you're going to shit on it publicly then you at least need to get your facts right.
Todd said in an interview that the main goal was to make Starfield a game "you can play forever", probably thinking about how all their other titles have enjoyed such enduring longevity, thanks in most part (imo) to mods like Fallout London (that Bethesda tried to hinder, mind you, with a mod breaking update on London's release day.) completely missing the point that modders only got so invested, thanks to the care and thought Bethesda's devs initially put into the game with it's environment story telling, and so on, Starfield had none of that, or very little, on release, so much so, that some mod devs, out right made it known, that they would NOT be making mods for it. And now here we are, with a game that looked at what NMS did with it's looping non-ending and thought, "Yes, that! That way the game can go forever!" for a narrative driven game. For years they have been making a cool sandbox with all the bells & whistles, tools, and hey a game too, for people to build in, this time they made the same, but forgot to give the shovels, buckets, and the sand is to be sold separately.
To be fair Fallout 3 and 4 are pretty good over all and all of the ELder scrolls games were great for their time. Sure Fallout 4 and Skyrim had plenty of bugs, but overall they were worth playing. That being said Starfield was clearly wehre Bethesda just ... completely lost their minds. Anyone that thought this DLC was going to right all of the wrongs was dreaming.
It's just more Starfield. It's not Far Harbor in space. It's the same formula the main game had. It's boring. I tried to look up lore and spoiler videos to see if they talked about the Va'ruun snake or something that would at least be interesting, but no it's just a side quest with a mini planet location. $30 in a recession. Insulting. I know people spent a lot of time working on this, but leadership at these companies need to do better on their decision making. They need to make fun games again. Black Flag was a fun game. RDR2 was a fun game. Skyrim was a fun game. We don't want chores, we want power fantasies and interesting choices.
Bethesda has burned up decades of community goodwill in just a few years. Its crazy Tod went from a saint who could do no wrong to a money grubbing weasle in such a short time.
It was not short time… Bethesda has not put out a good game in 10 to 13 years….its all Ben shit, fallouts have been trash so was starfield and they all buggy as fuck.., Even Skyrim was buggy and fucked….we just forgave it cuz it was a good game. Truth is Bethesda was never good, good at story telling sure, but they are the anti fromsoft. Where fromssoft Is great at game mech, but suck ass at tellliing stories Bethesda is good at story telling but suck ass at game mechanics and there games are buggy messes
@@aaronclay4665 It can be a buggy mess if its fun. I don't care how polished it is if its fun. Fallout 4 and skyrim were full of bugs. But they where a lot of fun. But yea, I guess it has been like 9yrs since fallout 4, shit.
Fallout 4, Fallout 76 and gazillion money grabing skyrim releases didnt damage his reputation for you? By the time Starfield released, everyone already gave up on Bethesda. Besides his fanboys of course.
@@michaelmichaelagnew8503Nepo babies and other useless people get into management and bloat the company. An Ubisoft dev said that basically half the company is middle managers. Wouldn’t be shocked if Bethesda is the same.
If i had billions, id buy game companies just to fire useless people like todd howard. But he probably has a contract where he cant get fired for the next 200 years.
Well it still made them millions. Bethesda said that about TES6 because everyone's expectations are so high but then get disappointed when the game is just a modern version of their previous game. Which is what most video games do but apparently it's only bad when Bethesda does it and only since they were bought by Xbox
It's becoming quite clear that most of these studios are regressing. The devs are talking like they aren't even expecting much success with Elder Scrolls 6. Which is giving off some serious flop vibes. Just like GTA 6, they waited so long to produce a new game. That the bar is now raised way higher than what it would have been if they just produced something new after 5 years. People are going to have seriously high expectations and that's their fault for holding out for so long.
So is Shattered Space. Content creators like this speed running the main story to get clicks from hate watchers. He spent more time making this video than playing the DLC.
They have been dead since Skyrim Fallout 4 story is just Fallout 3 with a different paint job Automatron is also based of Fallout 3 Far Harbor is Point Lookout with a bit of stolen NV Mod And Nuka-World is the only minor bit of creativity Vault-Tec DLC is a glorified tutorial
@@derkurier2710 tbh you're probably right plagiarism aside I did like far harbor though I've got a feeling in my gut that es6 is going to be an absolute disaster that very well may end Bethesda
I looked at it day of release. There were already reviews giving it five stars. Saying they don’t understand why people are giving the game such a hard time. But their dates were for the next day instead of the day it actually released. Good job Bethesda.
0:25 To be fair, that is listing only the main quest line. There are a dozen other quests that add an additional 10 to 15 hours of gameplay. That said, 30 bucks was still far to high a price for this when you compare it with Phantom Liberty at 29.99 ...
The Starfield expansion entertains two kinds of people: the people who played Starfield and said, "I liked that, I would like some more" and also the people who find joy in bashing and hating on a game that some people like. They get entertainment out of it without even having to buy it.
Actually after spending a little more time I've found a second companion. Like literally you guys playing for 8 minutes to get a little footage for your hate review or what? Like you guys got no credibility left but go on lol
@@derkurier2710 Actually one of them comes from a storyline, and there is absolutely no way to know yet if that is it. Creators saying they finished this DLC already are lying.
@@SecretlySeven Exactly. I am one of the top SF streamers and I have been streaming it since it dropped and still havent finished it. This creator spent more time making this video than actually playing the DLC.
I mean, I like the game, I came back and played it again for the first time since last year, and I'm really enjoying it. It seems really popular to hate games just for the sake of it. For the record, I also really enjoyed Mass Effect: Andromeda. There are games I know I wouldn't like, like racing games. I don't spend my time telling people I think racing games suck, and they're boring, I just don't play them, don't think about them, and play games I enjoy.
@@TheLurker1647 Well, it seems all the so called cool kids are part of the "cult of Starfield bad" atm. Over time that cult will split into new elements just like an unstable isotope or trending political ideology would. Nothing wrong with the game, decent enough story, can go thru game quite fast to try different outcome and there are decent amount of mods that get updated fast when needed. Right now I'm doing general "lets be a dick" playthru in a way that has the nastiest long term effects on galaxy once I jump to the next one. 😁
I just want elder scrolls open world with baldurs gate writing and choices. I want consequences for my actions i dont want the ability to lead multiple factions. If you have the choice to pick everything its not a choice at all
Its safe to say Bethesda is a has been and skyrim was their peek. They are a dead company. If we get another Elder Scrolls it will be worthless garbage and not worth buying.
I wonder when people will finally realize that Bethesda is the worst "AAA" game studio in the business with the worst game engine on the market. I'm not sure if it's management or what, but they have some very untalented people working there.
The hope I have for ESVI is that they are working within the same expanded engine and understanding they've cultivated for so long, and Starfield was so different that it required a lot of rethinking...so maybe, juuuuust maybe, ESVI will be fine.
You can really tell they are free. All of them are barebones and unfinished, and always introduce a ton of new bugs that break the game. I'd rather pay for proper DLC.
1:11 I don't think this is the "own" this person thinks it is. Bethesda is making literally 0 money from the older games on this list. There could be 5 million people playing FO4 and it wouldn't really matter since even if someone JUST bought it the game is almost always on sale.
If a game that you just made is being outperformed by a game that was made nearly 10 years ago that is about as big of an L as you could possibly take. Starfield didn't sell particularly well, starfield was a terrible exclusive for the platform that they are owned by, It has the most negative reviews out of any main line Bethesda game and It's expansion only served to make its review score even worse.
@@TheStrengthScholar I think RDR2 showed to everyone what a real AAA should look like. Bethesda though they could get away selling a space mod for FO4 for the price of a AAA game and nobody would complain or notice... Big mistake.
Was confused at Skyrim for a moment there. Then I realized they used the special edition version that came out 7 years later and not the original from 2011
$30 dollars for 4 hours of gameplay? That price should be lower than that or at least add more ‘better’ content to that worth of $30. The future of Elder Scrolls and Fallout might not be good than we hoped for…
LMAO bro are you a sheep? do you ever think? it was already obvious that any future Bethesda game is doomed to fail since FALLOUT 4 since that game was already pretty bad and bland. Heck, did you forgot Fallout 76? ONLY NOW you have doubts? YOU SERIOUSLY hoped anything from Bethesda after their huge disasters would be good? Bruh how many more bad games do they have to make before you wake up? They wont do anything better cause the sheep still give money and never wake up sadly. Starfield still dont even has maps lmao
@@SistaCitizen Does Bethesda pay you to defend bad games or are you an employee? We literally see absolute garbage, the bottom of the barrel and you speak about hate? My man this game doesn't even has reflection in the mirror or something as basic as an area map. Its the absolute bottom of the barrel that exists right now if you want to play a RPG Accept it, stop supporting trash and move on to better games.
@@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi First off, I am a female. I'm not your man. Secondly not only is there an area map, its 3d now. 3rdly, a good RPG player could play in an empty room. And lastly, lol tell it to my subs that I need to move on😂, unlike this creator, I actually play the game, not just make hate clips about it to make cash off of toxic folks like yourself.
@@SistaCitizen Congratulations, you got an area map for cities. Something Bethesda games many years ago launched with but for everywhere. Same with transporation, hooray the progress. You literally admitted that a "good RPG player" according to you is content with even the worst garbage served, that just means you have no standards and is pretty sad that you are happy with the bottom of the barrel as if its something good. We all played the game, thats why we criticize it and rate it as the trash that it is - cause we have simply seen better. I know, rocket science since we all have to be haters that never played the game right? Guess how I know that the game has no reflections in 2024 while games 6 years ago looked better and ran fine on a 1070. If you want an actual RPG with choices where not everybody is an invulnerable NPC, even those that tell you in your face they are going to kill you, please play Mass Effect, New Vegas or Dragon Age Origins. Expand your horizon a bit, your standards are very, very low.
![FORTNITE CLASSICS IS BACK! Fortnite Item Shop [November 15th, 2024] (Fortnite Chapter 5)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RbQURbeFwqs/mqdefault.jpg)
You say 5,000 players. Bethesda execs at the shareholder meeting say "increased players by 33%"
most of those are probably us fools who paid 100 euros for the premium edition so we got the dlc for "free"...end of an era, BGS is dead and gone
@@ashamahee Cmon it's not as bad as ubi. They still pulled half a billion from the game initial sales. Their games are not the best but it's still enjoyable for some people
@@Krasses they have most likely and probably with 90% certainty killed all potential for future profit with the shenanigans they have pulled off with Starfield and how they "updated" their older titles and left them broken after their so called next gen patches messed up the game.
UBI had several different IP's so for them it should have been relatively straight forward to churn out sequel after sequel as they had universes for everyone but decided to get so insanely greedy that they achieved the seemingly impossible.
@@Krasses Valhalla and Oddsey is not as destructive as Starfield at launch. I dont like Ubisoft but their AC for Valhalla and Oddsey still good.
God Forbid Cyberpunk release DLC that include new companion system because that absolutely goin to trash Starfield at its core level in their own expertise.
@@ashamahee I realized that Starfield killed my hype for any of their games after this. It isn't that immersive. I still felt like it's Skyrim in space.
They are probably going for ES6 next, and I'm thinking it would be just be another Skyrim. I mean Skyrim is great but they should let it die.
"They're mad again... Hit them with another Skyrim release and pretend ES6 is coming soon."
another skyrim release, and all is well in the world again
@Vult_Ira317
Seriously, people are still saying to buy the goty edition and not the latest anniversary cause it somehow broke modding. So the new team can't even port like the old one, what hope is there for ES6?
@@x0gucx Hope is strong and eternal in some.
Lmao Skyrim remake 2.0 lol just call it that lol 🤣 with that 2.0 on the name
Oh they did another Skyrim release
This time it was Skyrim in space, but people didn’t like it as much as even Apocalypse Skyrim for some reason 🧐
Reminder: people are still playing "Fallout 4", because of the "Fallout: London" mod.
Bethesda official releases got outclassed by a MOD.
Well a mod has passion put into it. That's something bethesda doesn't have anymore, so this isn't really surprising.
i hope youre aware that it is because of Modders that Bethesda as a company even exist and the main reason why they dont make quality games. i mean why make quality when modders fixes the problem, for free.
Not true. My buddy doesnt mod and started playing FO4 for the first time on the offical release.
Few of my other friends did as well who dont mod.
A mod for a game that wasn't well received when it comes out and people still think it is the worst fallout game (beside 76) 😉
Well shut the fuck up..point out crap like "akthualllyyy" @@spane81
30$ for 100 loading screens. 7 out of 10.
It just works
IGN's favourite game
wrong. it's $30
IGN probably
That's $3.33 per loading screen 👍
DO NOT pre-order TES6. The devs already said it won't live up to gamer's expectations.
💯💯💯
if TES6 is half as good as starfield it should be great
It's gonna be Starfield bad except in some woods. The only saving grace is that it will inherently have less loading screens due to being on one map.
Yeah it won't because people expect to be the best game of all time, same thing happening with gta 6
stop preordering games entirely, the fact that people still do that shit and then complain that the game sucks once it releases is crazy
Elder Scrolls 6 wasn't even a tenth complete, and the only reason why they announced it was to increase the Microsoft buyout.
For context, Far Harbor, Fallout 4’s best DLC, was priced at $15 at launch. It featured over 30 quests, a new companion, new settlement items, new weapons, and a better written story than the base game.
Bethesda has been falling off for years. This is just the newest drop.
They released fallout 76 after they were done with fallout 4. Terrible release doesn't begin to describe it.
Amd the sad part is Far harbor maind quest is a copy paste from fallout 4 main quest and is also a copy paste from fallout 3 main quest and Point Lockout
@@millerrepin4452 Everything went downhill after fallout 76 released. People even laughed how bad it was, they just kept screwing people over again and again. They couldn't even give people who paid a crazy amount of money proper...bags. Like actual bags, irl, that they ordered. They bait and switched literal bags because they were so cheap. Something happened to Bethesda during that time.
No they haven't only one bad main game 76 is successful now like it or not.
@@millerrepin4452Yet 76 is now fun for many.
Crazy that in the Witcher 3 30 dollars were blood and wine and hearts of stone, which if you play normally maybe you'll have 20-30 hours doing most main quests and if play doing everything maybe 60 hours...
I probably spent 50 hours in JUST Blood and Wine! It was amazing!
@@PierceMD me to mate, but I know there are ppl who probably just rush the main quests so, but in blood and wine I've spent maybe 50 hours only looking the landscape
you could easily spend 60+ in b+w if you were clearing the map.
@@captaingrizzly9511 yup, I already played maybe 100 hours there, got the platinum on PS4 completing both of the expansions, they're so good
idk, i open that game all modded up and i cant play more than 5-7 minutes 😍
Joke.
0:46 Let's be honest, the only reason that many people are still playing Fallout 4 is because they're running the Fallout London conversion, which is actually good.
Even before the mod came out there was tons of players. I never enjoyed the fallout series but Fallout 4 is legitimately a great game in itself.
Fallout 4 has so much replay value that it will never truly fade.
More so with the Modders
Some people actually enjoy fallout 4 vanilla
@@95onimusha I never said FO4 vanilla was bad.
But the surge in players recently is absolutely due to Fallout London's release.
@@ExtraStage300 oh, sorry, i misunderstood your comment
1:32 "keep your expectations low boy, and you will never be disappointed" -Kratos
Ahhhh, I'm replaying GoW 2018 and Ragnarok with my girlfriend. She's not a gamer but loves watching me play, and is amazed at how good a video game can be. Kratos, Mimir, Odin, Brok, so many good lines. I'd say your quote fits perfect
Imagine quoting soy Californian reboot Kratos.
@@OilFreeFeathers Kratos would just make a small guest appearance in angrbodas game
@@OilFreeFeathers upset that kratos is now focused on being a dad instead of a full fledged murder machine? 5 murder games should have been enough, now it's story focus time
And then the new times came, we kept our expectations low and were still disappointed.
If you still playing Starfield and bought the DLC you deserved it.
Without a doubt in the world. Anyone who ever purchased that game was a fool beyond any comparison I could make.
100%!
Exactly. I stopped playing a month after it came out, uninstalled it, and went back to No Man's Sky who fixed their game for Free. Screw Bethesda.
its a good game
@@zee-fr5kw no its not
A spanish streamer was sponsored to play the DLC. At the end of the two hours gameplay, while fighting some enemy, he get shot and died. The game saved in the process of getting shot, so the game was in a loop of reload, get shot, reload, get shot....
That happened to me back then.... when I was playing old games with manual quick saves. So that was my fault. But that's insane a game autosaves in a situation likes that!
When I was playing near release I would autosave into places I was literally trapped in. Like stuck in terrain in between boxes.
At least the DLC did better than Concord.
that's a very low bar to pass
Bethesda stans are gonna stan
I like how Concord became the new low standard that all other failures will be compared to.
this will be the new industry metric standard unit of measurement.
it did about as good as 50 Concords.
@@XiloTheOdd I prefer Dustborn as the standard. More granular that way. :p
I'll remind you that Skyrim's Dragonborn expansion added almost 40 hours worth of game.
Yeah, but Starfield gave us a PLANET. What did Dragonborn give us? Oh yeah, a puny island. Checkmate
@@TheMasterblah You forget the realm of Hermeus Mora. I'd argue a plane of Oblivion is pretty cool
@@Jarnsmidr oh shit. You're right. They added a separate, arguably infinite, plane of existence. Damn
@@TheMasterblahYou mean starfield gave you a procedurally generated city and an empty barren planet for you to do absolutely nothing? Yeah I'd settle with dragonborn. It actually has substance and good lore to it
@@sharjeelhumayun2691 He's almost certainly joking
Bethesda and Ubisoft are speedrunning bankruptcy
Yes
I think they made bank on Starfield (release). But I bet their next games will be flops
Bethesda printed money with starfield lol, they are not going bankrupt any time soon
Ubisoft yes, BGS no, owned by Microsoft.
@@chinchilla5162 yeah, Stargield was definitely their last cheque because it was essentially a cash grab that worked due to the amazing marketing they made to misguide people.. but now people are aware of all this.. if bethesda doesnt pull some innovative shii on ES6. They are doomed.
0:11 CONTEXT
0:11 CONTEXT!
0:11 CONTEXT
0:11 CONTEXT
0:11 CONTEXT 🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️
My favorite C word
The base game is still incredibly expensive. They didn’t even have a sale for the expansion.
If someone bought this game they deserved to get fleeced
Wait, hold on. If I'm understanding your comment correctly, then I misunderstood prices because I'm not in on the whole starfield thing, but what is the price of the base game? I thought the 30$ WAS the base game and the dlc had some other price
@@BotFisherman no the dlc is $30 and the base game is still $70
@@BotFisherman Starfield is $120 minimum for me or $170 for the premium edition.
@@Graestra just so you know, in my country specifically, Starfield’s base game cost about 1/3 of a cashier’s monthly wage.
The real question is why people still listen to what Todd says? How many times do you need to get burned before you stop putting hand on stove?
I have completely forgotten about this game, not sure why it is resurfacing til I know there is a dlc?
this has the feeling of content that was cut from the base game for the purpose of selling it as DLC
Because it totally was.
Apart from the fact the completely different style,atmosphere and moral decisions to be more evil than ever before? Did you PLAY it?
@@MeadowStargazer If that is true, then it would've been linked to Andreja better. It is her home planet
Edit: Well judging by MrMattyPlays tweet, it doesnt relate to her at all. So its not really base game
@@addaedansexcept that shouldn't be true because it was pre sold in advance. If you say 'They could've changed plans'that's what they are suggesting, but that it was an unfinished part of what was the original concept but branched it off from there to turn it to dlc. Point being, tone doesn't tell you.
Tes 6 will cost 99$ and it will be basically Starfield but on static map like Skyrim. Generic quests mostly generated by AI, shallow gameplay and same 5 voice actors doing all NPCs in in the entire game.
and all the NPCs will have the same wierd way of talking with mouth and head movements that I can't stand for more than 3 seconds
Will they remove another whole school of magic? Destroy the lore again like skyrim did?
The voices are gonna be AI generated at this point 😂
AI would be an improvement
@@justenjoilife5625 Of course, they haven't respected the lore since even Oblivion, tbh.
RIP, Elder Scrolls 6. I was excited for you once upon a time.
It really is once upon a time. How long ago was the trailer released?
@@friedegg-n8p 6 years ago iirc
Not even a trailer actually, just a teaser still image
Such a shame.
I regret wasting so much thought over this sequel.
I knew it was doomed as soon as they announced Starfield, and I still remember the die-hard defence so many cucks ran for that game before release. - I told em so
"I always hope for the best. Experience, unfortunately, has taught me to expect the worst." - Elim Garak
I'm always up for a good Garak quote
Man he really was just such an incredibly well written and acted character...
This other Garak interaction also fits considering all the lies we get fed by Todd/Bethesda
Bashir: But the point is, if you lie all the time, nobody's going to believe you, even when you're telling the truth.
Garak: Are you sure that's the point, Doctor?
Bashir: Of course. What else could it be?
Garak: That you should never tell the same lie twice.
So true, especially with Star Trek episodes post DS9.
The fault lies not in our stars, but in ourselves.
"If they don't like Starfield, they can play Skyrim." (Todd Antoinette)
Hot take - Starfield was not a good game. Skyrim was not either.
@@DM-qd7gw personally I think skyrim is a good game if you just want to mess around, it's definitely not an RPG though lol. better skyrim than starfield, less loading screens
@@DM-qd7gwskyrim was good for the time it was made for
@@comput3r L take
@@comput3r your dumbass take needs no rebuttal lil bro numbers speak it all
This is scaring me for Elder scroll 6
I'm sure modders will fix it, so Bethesda can rerelease yet another mediocre game 20 times
Oblivion was my childhood #1 game.
I lost all hope & anticipation for TES6 years ago. And am better off for it, sadly.
1:20 for added fuel, those past games is pretty much played by fully modded gamers. AKA THE GAMES THAT IS FIXED BY THE PLAYERS.
which starfield doesnt really haave at the moment. the CC JUST released not long ago. we have nowhere near the complexity of mods that skyrim has nor mods that varry as much. comparing skyrim to starfield is the WORST take one could possibly ever have
@@N00bie666 also the toolkit is not free.
that is the future, look at EA, we buy the game but we are also the one who make the game
Stop acting like Bethesda games from Morrowind through Fallout 4 weren’t masterpieces, you really think MODS are what made those games good?
@@just.a.guy324 If you need fking players to fix those games, then they are only as good as PLATFORMS FOR MODS
16 times the loading screens.
Light Wood Laminate
Light Wood Laminate
Light Wood Laminate
They last like two seconds each. Complaining about loading screens is the most smoothbrained non-criticism of Starfield. It has huge worldbuilding and narrative issues. 2 second loading screens are not its problem.
That's not even an exaggeration
It just works
@@TheLurker1647You should play Cyberpunk. We don’t need cell based architecture in modern open world games anymore.
Bethesda have gone the same was as Ubisoft and Blizzard. The talent all gets replaced by middle managers and HR departments and suddenly they seem unable to produce a good product. Nothing new here, its the managerial economy and its a fate which is rarely escaped by good companies. The creative, talented people all get rewarded by being fired or cancelled and replaced by middle managers. Read 'The Organization Man'
It's important to note too that most people playing fallout 4 right now, are actually playing Fallout London through f4se.
Modders saving bethesda's ass once again 😂
Why are you calling the script extender like its some platform? Most people play skyrim and damn near ever other bethesda game are also using a script extender. Tf your point?
Like 10 fans are making better expansions than 200 devs with an "upgraded" engine.😂
It's also important to note, 90% of the people who play bethesda games, mod the shit out of it to enjoy it or just fk around with it.
You're liar . Because according to steam db average online in may is 20000 , and in July is 23000 nobody cares about fallout London
I have a feeling Starfield was already an abandoned product because of the low player numbers, but they were already obligated to make at least the one expansion courtesy of the premium edition so they half-assed this to focus on other projects.
In "I think it was the deep dive" they leaked a section of the video that had working mechs.
Dev on it hasnt stopped fully yet, but there is a good chance future dev will get shut down.
@@Panssel It's cursed because they made a shit game, it's that simple. Could they still salvage some of it? It's possible but Bethesda is far too greedy and corporate to do that, I can't see them pulling a No Mans Sky or CyberPunk comeback. No Mans Sky were Indie Devs who genuinely cared about the product, CD Project Red knew they needed to save their reputation and they did. Plus CyberPunk was a great game that was just riddled with bugs and massively imbalanced, it was capable of saving. This game? Honestly, it's so fucking bland, it would literally need years and years of content and enhancements which Bethesda will not deliver. Nobody is going to want to mod a boring game.
@@avvc21 I doubt you.
@@Panssel Would have helped if they released the modding tools with the game... like they did with previous games. Those being almost a full year late just destroyed any momentum it might have had.
@@avvc21then what is your other social media ? Because here you have no subs, otherwise i'm not trusting you
Also remember a lot of these might be people who got it with the deluxe edition so will not necessarily translate to sales either.
Meanwhile Cyberpunk: Phantom Liberty:
- New Zone
- Some OP weapons
- Banger soundtracks
- New story ending (optional)
- New robo lady to replace Panam
- Some new weapons and signature weapons
- New endless side misisons
- Max-Tac Rework
- Car-combat
- An actual new faction
S tier characters and voice acting.
Idris Elba.
Don't forget the super cool Blackwall cyberdeck
i miss songbird already
The Lizzie performance in that expansion blew my mind!
They got so used to remastering Skyrim for 100yrs that they forgot how to make games from ground up lol
People were hyped up about ship making in this game, and then they realize that was all the game have to offer.
30 bucks for THAT? While fromsoft basically released a new game with 10 dollars more
tbf i honestly think the dlc was overprized compared to the base game. the amount of new items was actually small. the amount of dungeons was really small as well. 1 absolutely amazing legacy dungeon yes but otherwise only the left over dungeons..
@@Foatizenknechtl "the amount of new items was actually small"
Bruh you didn't play the DLC. Who tf cares about small, optional cave dungeons? They're bad in the base game and they're MUCH better in the DLC. Quantity // Quality. Shadow Keep and Belurat arguably the best Legacy Dungeon they ever made.
The ER DLC was $40. That's 2/3s the price of the original game. It was great and well worth the money, imo, but let's not use sale prices like it's the standard. (The game was 2.5 years old by the time the sale happened and most sales would put base ER around $40. Meaning, together being $80 isn't selling the DLC for $10. It's actually closer to the original $40 price point)
@@mercylavigne actually I 100% it. so thats that.
@@mercylavigne The DLC caves are just as bad as the base game caves, imo. I didn't think the base game caves were bad though, so do with that info as you will
I really hope that enough games flop to make it clear to the studios that quality games are the only way forward but game flops will likely just mean layoffs, microtransactions and maybe studio closures.
Idk what you're smoking but Starfield was a pretty big success
Part of the problem is the phoenix from the ashes stories of No Man’s Sky and Cyberpunk. Every studio - particularly Bethesda - thinks they can do the same thing. I.e. release the game too early, lock in the cash, spend years improving the game and fans will eventually forgive and forget and, heck, even give you multiple gaming awards for your efforts
@@bigsmoke167 its trash
Kinda funny that we're at that year when people are not willing to play the new broken game, but are more willing to go back and play old games that were once released as broken but are now fixed.
@@bigsmoke167 lmao
Remember Todd, if you make a good Elder Scrolls sequel game, you can sell it to me another 10 times and I'll buy it each time.
That moment when you get more hype out of a Skyrim quest mod updating than a Starfield official expansion
Can confirm. Still eagerly waiting for Glenmoril to be done. Along with whatever Vicn's current side project is. ("da-c0da", I think it's called? Involves the Numidium somehow.)
@@xiii-san5535 Vicn's trilogy is legitimately going to be better than actual TES6 isn't it? Bethesda is cooked
The writings been on the wall for a long, long time. Although I am eagerly awaiting beyond Skyrim and Glenmoril.
Its because Skyrim is a decent game on its own, it doesnt have the core issues Starfield have (constant loading screens, wide as a ocean deep as a puddle etc..). Heck even combat, which is one of Skyrims weakest points, is more enjoyable in Skyrim than in Starfield due to the existence of magic and stealth being more fun.
Starfield could easily have been A LOT better, had they went for a more fantasy sci-fi approach (more of a Warhammer 40K vibe, with magic, various races, gods), and focused on making a few very large handcrafted worlds and reducing the amount of loading and the need to travel all the time. Since they werent able to make ship-travel seamless with manual landing and taking off (like No mans sky) they should have just skipped all the ship mechanics and just have it be a fast travel between planets like in Outer Worlds. The game also lacks a unique feel and edge to it, everything, including the factions, are very tame, bland and boring. Soft modern. Basically what the should have gone for was more of a fantasy-sci fi Fallout New Vegas imo.
@@Vikingskog What? Most of the problems Starfield has were present in Skyrim as well. That's the real issue here. Overabundance of loading screens? Check. Wide as an ocean deep as a puddle? Check. Terrible AI? Check. Even when it comes to combat, it's hard to find something they did right. The magic system in Skyrim is the worst it's ever been due to how the level scaling works. And the stealth? Laughably bad. The only reason people like it is because it trivializes much of the combat encounters thanks to the terrible stealth detection. You could headshot a bandit right in front of his compatriots and still remain undetected.
1:07 "How is this the response to the criticism they faced at launch?" Uh, hmm... Maybe, because people kept paying Bethesda to buy and play their game, anyway, in spite of the complaining? Almost like Bethesda is a company, and as such, they pay more attention to their bottom line than to complaints on the Internet. If you want a company to change, you have to hit them where it hurts, and the comments section on Twitter (or r/Bethesda) is not it, Chief. How do people not understand this basic concept?
But how would people then posture online?
@@mootedtols4865 True.
Why is every game company nowadays cooked 😭😭😭
They hired more marketing and less creativity LOL
They just aren't what they use to be anymore 😭
Money
Wokes
DEI hiring quotas instead of hiring the best.
3 enemy types
2 Non re-skin guns
2 Melees that no one cared about.
1 Non-recolor new space suit
Less than a dozen new outfits
Less than a dozen new items
No new ship parts
No new skills
No new Companions
No new general POIs
-2 new companions..so far
-Not just a new planet to explore but a whole new system with several moons to explore.
-More than a dozen new outfits.
-New player home
-4 different variations of new melee weapons, one you get in a legendary when completing a mission
-Over 5 new enemy types. so far.
- 5 new Va ruun weapons so far
The fact that you didnt know about any of this shows you are just like the rest of the trolls, and this creator, you didnt actually play it.
@@SistaCitizen don't waste your time, girl. let's just play and have fun. enjoying your streams btw
Meanwhile No Man's Sky gets lots of significant updates. For free.
I know it's unfair to compare the two, both are space themed, Starfield is more like an action RPG, No Man's Sky is space exploration action adventure sandbox.
@@SistaCitizen Don't forget that the new system has new unique POIs in general exploration.
@@SistaCitizen No offense, but you're celebrating something that is still inferior to Far Harbor and DragonBorn :/.
Because Bethesda is by far the worst "AAA" game studio in the business. They're somehow a decade+ behind in graphics, facial animations, cutscenes, gunplay and a myriad of other things. And let's not even get started their complete inability to even the slightest bit compelling dialogue and stories.
I truly don't understand how or why people but Bethesda games. There's literally nothing they're good at except marketing. Not to mention the game engine is absolutely horrendous. Your character feels like a floating camera with zero weight to it.
I am and always will be bewildered as to how Bethesda got as big as they did. I believe if it weren't for the modding community and support then nobody wouldc buy their games. They're just bad.
Starfield is without a doubt the most uninspired game I've ever played. The one positive is ship building, which is useless considering "space flight" is essentially just a loading screen.
bethesda Cult is crazy, they would sacrifice people on stakes for next trash game from Bethesda. some people are too blinded to see
Exactly how I think. I could write a book with atleast 1000 pages full of problems every single one of their games have. I played all of these games too, even Starfield (kinda forced myself to like it by playing for 80h) and I seriously dont get this cult following.
They are still by a technical standpoint in a late Ps3/early Ps4 era but these games atleast always had something about them - exploration in Skyrim for example was really fun at that time - Starfield doesnt even have that. Its just uninspired garbage and Im convinced this is by far the best Bethesda can do. Its not like they havent tried. They are just years behind everyone else.
Look at Studios like Fromsoft, Naughty Dog, Rockstar, CDPR, even Guerilla (I dont like Horizon that much but still), Santa Monica, Square Enix, Capcom etc. The list goes on and on. You dont have to like all their games, but you look at their games or even play their games for 5 minutes and you instantly see the mindblowing difference between them and Bethesda. Starfield feels like a Ps3 game remastered with better graphics (the Bethesda meele attack or their character movement says it all). Thats btw the only good thing I have to say about Starfield. Some locations look very cool, but thats it and I lost every hope for a good Elder Scrolls game
Same reason ppl like blizzard….they are an American company…..
And they played what they Thought was a good game when they were kids..
Bethesda has always been bad/behind , dragons dogma was way better than Skyrim at the time.
At least blizzard can say they were good in the 90s and maybe up to 2008…I like Skyrim and played it a bunch but the MUSIC and environment saved that game, it’s gameplay was terrible, stories were good. But that’s it
They hooked alot of people with skyrim, and some of us just refuse to let go... I don't know if you were there for skyrims original release, but it was an amazing game at that time
@@peterlong2580 skyrim wasn't even that good, I was impressed by oblivion. I tried to play Skyrim but felt dull and empty
The new rarest achievement in starfield for Xbox is completing the expansion
I would love to be a game developer these days.
To be paid well and just put out half-ass work all the time. That's the dream.
They are not payed that well lol, also less content means less pay for the devs what
Most of this junk is being developed by skeleton teams under unreasonable deadlines and poor pay
all the people whining about crunch time. this is what you get.
dei hires
You need a government job.
Fallout 4's Far Harbour's pinkie finger has more going for it than the entirety of Starfield.
Bethesda was my favorite game studio since I was like 17 and started playing Oblivion religiously. I remember how fuckin hyped I was when I watched those men in black cloaks come out on stage and I immediately knew this is TES5 being announced. I watched the first gameplay footage with Todd on stage showing off the new engine and mechanics over and over again anxiously for the next year waiting for it to finally come out. Then I bought my first copy of Skyrim on release day and have bought 5-6 copies on every console other than pc and put 1000s of hours in to it since, literally to this day as I played for about an hour today.
Once again, in 2018, I was hyped up again. After nearly a decade, FINALLY, they were announcing the next game. Id been playing ESO since launch at this point and was ready for a new core game. Then I realized they hadnt even started developing it yet.. Its now 6 FUCKIN YEARS LATER AND NOTHING. No gameplay, no nee mechanics, no story leaks, no setting leaks. NOTHING! Then the shit show that is Starfield comes out, and I have realized that the game studio I once adored is gone..
I dont have high hopes for TES6 unfortunately. I hope they surprise me, but I doubt it. Most of the gaming world has been conquered by woke policy, and Bethesda is a shell of what it once was.
yea similar story on my part , whole thing is sad, idk i even lost all hype for tes6 it has been to long time and bethesda ,has done nofting but shit in past decade.
Bethesdas problem isnt because of woke. it is the fact theyve spent a decade deliberatly making bad products. this what happens when a company realises that they dont need to make new games consider that the consumer will buy their re-releases instead. also why make a good product when modders can fix their problem for free. if it wasnt for the modder community their company would go bankrupt years ago for their lack of productivity. when 90% entire productivity line is because of modders you see why their games are the way they are.
@@dendrien DEI, gender ideology and greedy practices are the problem. The good developers have left the company and been replaced with diversity hires who cant do the job, let alone fill the shoes of those who are gone.
So yes, it does have to do with woke ideology. Its not the whole problem, but its a major part of it, just like every other studio falling off.
@@donmab Yes, hes given in to the DEI shit. Its primarily his fault. That we agree on.
Bro same same
Elden Ring: 40 dollars for over 40 hours, take it or leave it.
Fromsoft seems miraculously untouched by the decline of the entertainment industry.
@@RobertMalachowski “about the size of Limgrave.”
They literally downplayed their own DLC. They are probably the best game studio around rn
@@Watchful0ne They downplayed the base game as well before it came out. Miyazaki said that Elden Ring would take about 30 hours
You know it's bad when even MrMattyShills is voicing his displeasure
bring back the horse armor
No! Do NOT give them ideas! I do NOT want to see horse armor for Vasco!
Tbh i would’ve been fine with horse armor if it wasn’t purely cosmetic
A good friend of mine (of 20 years) is one of those 5,000 people who are playing the Starfield expansion. He is taking the day tomorrow to play Star Wars Outlaws. He said, and I'm not making this up, he said: "It sounds like a pretty good game". Twenty years a friend... and today I learned he is a bot.
I don't really understand why that upsets you. I have friends who like to play golf, I have friends who like to suck dick. I'm not into either of those hobbies myself, but to each their own. I'm not going to join them if they invite me to join those activities, but I'm happy that they're having fun.
Isn't the definition of a bot following the crowd ? Sounds like he's playing the games and making up his own opinion.
Quite literally the opposite of a bot.
@@Quickb3n Unironically calling someone a bot is something a bot would actually say too. It's in their programming.
He just sounds like a casual. I mean casuals usually have idiotic opinions stemming from not even playing games beyond surface level, so it’s not like their views matter.
He enjoys what he feels is fun for him, and does not care what others think of it. So maybe you're the bot?
This was 100 percent a cut faction quest line sold as Dlc.
Bethesda has become immensely arrogant and lazy
Tru
that's what you get for releasing flawed products and still getting money no matter how lacking it is in content and quality
Gamers did that
Todd's always been like this i bet, just that he can't coast off people's talents anymore lol
That "has become" goes back 15-20 years by now.
But the same way a dead tree can still stand upright even when it's core is rotten, it took a while for people to notice.
They even messed up the land vehicle, since the mouse is locked to the steering. I swear to god, it's one step forward and a giant backflip backwards with Bethesda
True i hated it in Mass Effect i hate it here
You can change that in the settings. Just sayin.
@@SistaCitizen did that doesn't work.
Got an ad for this just before the video. Glorious
That ending felt unfinished too. not really a spoiler, but you get zero lore on their beliefs, what or who the great serpent is, why they are so extreme and so devoted etc. It's all cause '1 guy said he talked to a snake god 100 years ago'. And the most important missing lore bit, in the base game the pilgrim talked about in his logs how he fought some guy and died over and over (he went in the unity so he kept fighting him in different universes) and it was strongly implied the other person was the OJ varuun founder. I expected some sort of extended lore on the unity, the interactions the founder of the house had with the pilgrim, if the snake god is actually a starborn who started a cult. My friends and I were theory crafting so hard and considering the deep lore of TES, expected some GOOD STUFF here, and we got NOTHING. ZERO. NO EXPLANATION ABOUT ANYTHING. The DLC just randomly ends. No end of DLC loot, no explanation of how things work or happened. and NO CHOICES. It's the same ending no matter what. This was INSANELY BAD just from a lore perspective.
In fallout 4, at least the crazies (children of atom) you have unexplained magical effects like radiation not hurting you, and a womens voice whispering to you. That could make you a believer even if it's not explained. In starfield? Do we have a snake talking to us, or some magical powers? Nope. Everything was SPOILERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR a science project gone wrong, experimenting with grav drive tech to move people into a state of limbo like existence. How does that make people worship a serpent god? There's nothing moving them to the cult. The children of atom, she (the voice) talks to you, guides you, makes you powerful somehow. It's enough to hook people into worshipping... I expected the first intro quest to at least let us interact with the snake god somehow during initiation. Or hear him talk to you or give you orders. There was NOTHING.
Propably saving the sweet stuff for starborn focused expansion.
this was my biggest concern. the steam player count is mostly meaningless, because anyone with game pass is playing it from the Xbox app. But the actual lore being shit is a whole other thing
@@DarkZodiacZZI’m wondering if they’ll actually do another DLC.
@@cd.knuckles Gamepass doesn't give you DLCs, people would have to buy them and the very nature of Gamepass means barely anyone buys DLC for games they might lose at some point. So no, not many there are playing it either. It is Steam and Xbox purely.
@@fish5645 so what. If you’re playing on steam you also have to buy the dlcs. Most people were playing the game on gamepass, zero question.
Not to mention on Xbox
Yeah I don't have much excitement or anticipation anymore for Elder Scrolls VI
Wow, I wouldnt even have realized Starfield even got an expansion without this clip.
*Bethesda*
Bethesda never changes...
I wish Bethesda never changes. We'd still have good games then
Bethesda: It costs $30
Me: Its a fair price for a game
Bethesda: ...
Me: For the game... right?
It was functionally one questline. Like a faction quest. The Vanguard questline felt more rewarding and longer.
Starfield: Little to no modding community. Expensive and bug-ridden. Game is deemed by some modders as pointless to mod. OR
Fallout 4: Utterly enormous modding community. Multiple mod world constructions, including Fallout London, with Fallout Miami nearing completion, remakes, and continuations of past Fallout games in Fallout 4's engine, all made by fans, including voice auditions they accomplished, coming up with new weapons, enemies, layouts, and beyond that even surpass Bethesda's capabilities. Literally, the game has new content coming out for FREE. Complete Fallout 4 game (especially on sale) is generally cheap and inexpensive and can be modded to anything your heart's content. The game might be 9 years old, but the modding community's sheer size keeps players coming back for more and more.
Fallout 4's motto might as well be, "Got a certain issue with the game? Don't worry. There's a mod for it."
It helps that Fallout is an established franchise with a 30 year history.
F4 is the Skyrim of Fallout. The modding community will see that it lives forever more to at least some degree.
It's pointless to mod because at the end of the day, mods wouldn't bring anything into the existing game structure. It's soo lacking in content and underlying mechanics that it's just a glorified game engine demo at that point. It's like saying "mod unreal engine 5's base demo files to add playability", you'd essentially be starting from scratch because there's nothing to build off of, and at that point you might as well make an entirely independent game that isn't a mod at all, or a mod of some other game with actual content and ways to utilize mods. Just think about it, what could you mod into starfield that would be worthwhile? It already has things like owning houses and decorating them, but even that is super boring and useless. It's a place you don't even need to go to, because you already have everything you need on the ship. It's not even worth the time spent decorating because you're not going to spend any time there because there's nothing to do there.
And outside of the storyline, it's just the same dozen or so points of interest repeated over and over, that are pretty much entirely meant for farming, which you don't even need to do much of at generated points of interest, because you'll get more than enough resources naturally as you progress. Since there is effectively no real open world, and soo little to do outside of following the storyline missions, there's just nothing worth modding. The only modding that would be worthwhile at that point is something that mods in completely new storylines, with new locations and dialogs.
But there is soo few game in starfield, that the amount of modding required to make the world feel lived in and full of things to do, would be like making a completely new game from scratch, and again, at that point you might as well just make a separate game set in its own universe, because the starfield universe is pretty bland. Its entire backstory is people have faster than light drives and occupy a bunch of planets and have some internal conflicts and are finding some alien artifacts. That's as generic as they come. There's no truly unique or riveting store to build off of.
All the important mods were updated really fast. Didn't have to wait for script extender and achievement enabler and some other stuff for long.
@peoplez129 @cmedtheuniverseofcmed8775 😂😂Bruh wut? There are more mods for Starfield at this time than there was for Fallout and Skyrim at this time for their launch. In fact Elianora and other legendary Fallot and Skyrim modders designed the base game for Starfield. Elianora made all the outpost habs and ship habs for the vanilla game. People swear Fallout and Skyrim at launch were amazing, when the facts are the DLC's and 10 years of updates and mods made both of those games good, otherwise Morrowind and Oblivion will still be banging on the charts.
Fallout 4 is almost 10 years old and still going strong
Feel old
Bethesda games just rotate through a hate train cycle. When Fallout 4 came out, people were eviscerating it the same way they're doing to Starfield now. "Oh no a voiced protagonist, muh 'mersion! Oh no I can't so sidequests I must find my son! YES, NO, QUESTION, SNARKY YES dialogue wheel". Now people like it? Seems like once ES6 comes out, people will be hating on it and saying how great Starfield was.
@@TheLurker1647No many loved Fallout 4 only Jaded ignorant fnv fans hated it but most of us avredge Fallout fans loved it.
@@redemptionjack4657I second this. Fallout 4 was a really good game and I loved it's story and companions and the dialogue as well. Especially the far harbor expansion. Ppl who bash it are hardcore nv fans that prob didn't even play the game
Still, I'm playing Starfield, not Fallout 4. Just started the expansion so I can't really tell what the overall quality is but the first mission has nice atmosphere.
@@redemptionjack4657 Yes they loved the new gameplay most everyone hated/disliked the Story because its predictable being its Fallout 3 story only you the dad this time and because you were somebody taking a lot of the Roleplay out of your character, being Nate the War Criminal or Nora the Lawyer
0:24 DEI hiring working as intended lmao
man y'all blame everything on dei when a majority of these hires have been here for almost 5 years and just suck at doing their job
@@AlinUreLive exactly.. they were all hired 5 years ago when DEI was taking effect lfmao..
Well SBI doesn't lie,they do burn the "Western Game Industry"on the ground.
We need an Asmongold DLC
Quit the video when you claimed there were 0 new companions, there are at least 2 that I know of. But then I didn't try to rush the DLC as quickly as possible just to claim it was short.
If you don't like something that's fine, but if you're going to shit on it publicly then you at least need to get your facts right.
Skyrim SE from 8 years ago with community shaders just casually pushing starefield's shit in without dwarven oil.
Todd said in an interview that the main goal was to make Starfield a game "you can play forever", probably thinking about how all their other titles have enjoyed such enduring longevity,
thanks in most part (imo) to mods like Fallout London (that Bethesda tried to hinder, mind you, with a mod breaking update on London's release day.)
completely missing the point that modders only got so invested, thanks to the care and thought Bethesda's devs initially put into the game with it's environment story telling, and so on,
Starfield had none of that, or very little, on release, so much so, that some mod devs, out right made it known, that they would NOT be making mods for it.
And now here we are, with a game that looked at what NMS did with it's looping non-ending and thought, "Yes, that! That way the game can go forever!" for a narrative driven game.
For years they have been making a cool sandbox with all the bells & whistles, tools, and hey a game too, for people to build in, this time they made the same, but forgot to give the shovels, buckets, and the sand is to be sold separately.
Todd is just creatively bankrupt and cannot stand independent modders making better games on his engine than he does.
The sole fact that they added a buggy when they initially said "no need [our maps are too tiny anyway]" is funny
Bethesda still hasn't fixed the DLC gun. $7 quest that nets you a sniper rifle you can't reload. Seriously, 4 shots, then you're done.
I saw a video a few days ago and it was fixed
I saw a YT having to buy a vehicle, get in then get out to fix that DLC gun 🤣
Why is anyone surprised
If you buy bethesda, you get what you deserve
I stopped after Horse Armor. Never got another one of their games after that.
@@aj.j5833 Your loss, skyrim and Fallout 4 are fantastic games, even to this day.
To be fair Fallout 3 and 4 are pretty good over all and all of the ELder scrolls games were great for their time.
Sure Fallout 4 and Skyrim had plenty of bugs, but overall they were worth playing.
That being said Starfield was clearly wehre Bethesda just ... completely lost their minds. Anyone that thought this DLC was going to right all of the wrongs was dreaming.
Because skyrim and fallout 4 are good games. Starfield is not. People were expecting starfield to be just another basic Bethesda game but it's worse.
@@TravisHi_YT Your loss, we can play their games without giving them money
Man, Beth has fallen FAR since Skyrim...a hundred new LOADING SCREENS? SERIOUSLY, Todd?? THAT'S what your starfield team was doing??
They are hoping modders will fix and add contents for their game.
It's just more Starfield. It's not Far Harbor in space. It's the same formula the main game had. It's boring. I tried to look up lore and spoiler videos to see if they talked about the Va'ruun snake or something that would at least be interesting, but no it's just a side quest with a mini planet location. $30 in a recession. Insulting. I know people spent a lot of time working on this, but leadership at these companies need to do better on their decision making. They need to make fun games again. Black Flag was a fun game. RDR2 was a fun game. Skyrim was a fun game. We don't want chores, we want power fantasies and interesting choices.
I found Skyrim rather dull. I always preferred Fallout 4
Just wondering, is the US still in recession?
The point is imagine what the elder scrolls vi will looks like with starfield as a parameter.
Bethesda has burned up decades of community goodwill in just a few years. Its crazy Tod went from a saint who could do no wrong to a money grubbing weasle in such a short time.
It was not short time… Bethesda has not put out a good game in 10 to 13 years….its all Ben shit, fallouts have been trash so was starfield and they all buggy as fuck..,
Even Skyrim was buggy and fucked….we just forgave it cuz it was a good game.
Truth is Bethesda was never good, good at story telling sure, but they are the anti fromsoft.
Where fromssoft Is great at game mech, but suck ass at tellliing stories
Bethesda is good at story telling but suck ass at game mechanics and there games are buggy messes
@@aaronclay4665 It can be a buggy mess if its fun. I don't care how polished it is if its fun. Fallout 4 and skyrim were full of bugs. But they where a lot of fun. But yea, I guess it has been like 9yrs since fallout 4, shit.
Fallout 4, Fallout 76 and gazillion money grabing skyrim releases didnt damage his reputation for you? By the time Starfield released, everyone already gave up on Bethesda. Besides his fanboys of course.
@@ZOMBIEo07 I liked fallout 4, 76 was the first thing that really irked me. All downhill from there. But Skyrim carried them hard.
Didn't Bethesda say themselves people will be disappointed with TES6... Microsoft really f'cked up buying them.
Microsoft did screw up buying them, but they screwed up not firing their top brass who are worthless.
@@michaelmichaelagnew8503Nepo babies and other useless people get into management and bloat the company. An Ubisoft dev said that basically half the company is middle managers. Wouldn’t be shocked if Bethesda is the same.
If i had billions, id buy game companies just to fire useless people like todd howard. But he probably has a contract where he cant get fired for the next 200 years.
Well it still made them millions. Bethesda said that about TES6 because everyone's expectations are so high but then get disappointed when the game is just a modern version of their previous game. Which is what most video games do but apparently it's only bad when Bethesda does it and only since they were bought by Xbox
It's becoming quite clear that most of these studios are regressing. The devs are talking like they aren't even expecting much success with Elder Scrolls 6. Which is giving off some serious flop vibes.
Just like GTA 6, they waited so long to produce a new game. That the bar is now raised way higher than what it would have been if they just produced something new after 5 years. People are going to have seriously high expectations and that's their fault for holding out for so long.
I think we all expect Elder Scrolls 6 to be garbage at this point. Bethesda is stuck in 2010
At worst it will be good none of Bethesda games are garbage they’re either good or great.
They are now worse than in 2010. I don't think current Bethesda could make Skyrim anymore.
@@BatManFan0 Sure, bud. Whatever helps you sleep.
It won't be garbage. It will be extremely bland. Just like skyrim.
If they keep on this way, just replay Skyrim, there is not much difference. 😂
Skyrim's Dawnguard was around 30 hours of content and story.
Dragonborn was an additional 40.
So is Shattered Space. Content creators like this speed running the main story to get clicks from hate watchers. He spent more time making this video than playing the DLC.
That's hilarious, I got a Bethesda ad for starfield right as the video wrapped up
Bethesda has been dead since 76
Sadly
They have been dead since Skyrim
Fallout 4 story is just Fallout 3 with a different paint job
Automatron is also based of Fallout 3
Far Harbor is Point Lookout with a bit of stolen NV Mod
And Nuka-World is the only minor bit of creativity
Vault-Tec DLC is a glorified tutorial
@@derkurier2710 tbh you're probably right plagiarism aside I did like far harbor though I've got a feeling in my gut that es6 is going to be an absolute disaster that very well may end Bethesda
Shocked
I looked at it day of release. There were already reviews giving it five stars. Saying they don’t understand why people are giving the game such a hard time. But their dates were for the next day instead of the day it actually released. Good job Bethesda.
The Fallout of Starfield will be the Doom of Bethesda.
Fallout 76 showed us that Bethesda is a hasbeen. We saw it then before starfield was released. Starfield just put the nail in the coffin.
seeing that description for the DLC and comparing it to Shadow of the Erdtree is absolutely grim
No new ship parts? What a missed opportunity to add new and excitin---- Ah right. This is Bethesda
Seriously the one thing EVERYONE could get behind and praise was ship building and they ignored it for 6 total missions and 3 guns. 😂
I love Bethesda for the same reason I hate Bethesda. They are so unbelievably stuck in their ways.
Well yes but they somehow got worse and worse at doing it. It's worse than any other expansion by a mile. It's like ubisoft.
0:25 To be fair, that is listing only the main quest line. There are a dozen other quests that add an additional 10 to 15 hours of gameplay. That said, 30 bucks was still far to high a price for this when you compare it with Phantom Liberty at 29.99 ...
There is a companion and it's easily 6-8 hours. I'm not saying it isn't shit but at least people gotta be fucking honest.
The Starfield expansion entertains two kinds of people: the people who played Starfield and said, "I liked that, I would like some more" and also the people who find joy in bashing and hating on a game that some people like. They get entertainment out of it without even having to buy it.
Actually after spending a little more time I've found a second companion. Like literally you guys playing for 8 minutes to get a little footage for your hate review or what? Like you guys got no credibility left but go on lol
The ""Companion"" you mean is 100% those ship crew members you can recruit they don`t really count considering they are Skyrim Companions in 2024
@@derkurier2710 Actually one of them comes from a storyline, and there is absolutely no way to know yet if that is it. Creators saying they finished this DLC already are lying.
@@SecretlySeven Exactly. I am one of the top SF streamers and I have been streaming it since it dropped and still havent finished it. This creator spent more time making this video than actually playing the DLC.
💀
starfield white knights must feel real good rn
I mean, I like the game, I came back and played it again for the first time since last year, and I'm really enjoying it. It seems really popular to hate games just for the sake of it. For the record, I also really enjoyed Mass Effect: Andromeda. There are games I know I wouldn't like, like racing games. I don't spend my time telling people I think racing games suck, and they're boring, I just don't play them, don't think about them, and play games I enjoy.
@@TheLurker1647 Well, it seems all the so called cool kids are part of the "cult of Starfield bad" atm. Over time that cult will split into new elements just like an unstable isotope or trending political ideology would. Nothing wrong with the game, decent enough story, can go thru game quite fast to try different outcome and there are decent amount of mods that get updated fast when needed.
Right now I'm doing general "lets be a dick" playthru in a way that has the nastiest long term effects on galaxy once I jump to the next one. 😁
@@TheLurker1647 maybe you like shitty games ?
that's ok to
@@DarkZodiacZZ if you like shit that's not my problem
@@DarkZodiacZZ 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
"lets be a dick playthrough" choices be like:
- Yes
- Yes, but tell me more
- Yes (sarcastic) ✔️
- No, but actually yes
I just want elder scrolls open world with baldurs gate writing and choices. I want consequences for my actions i dont want the ability to lead multiple factions.
If you have the choice to pick everything its not a choice at all
Its safe to say Bethesda is a has been and skyrim was their peek. They are a dead company. If we get another Elder Scrolls it will be worthless garbage and not worth buying.
I wonder when people will finally realize that Bethesda is the worst "AAA" game studio in the business with the worst game engine on the market.
I'm not sure if it's management or what, but they have some very untalented people working there.
Stafield Shattered Dreams 😂😂😂
The hope I have for ESVI is that they are working within the same expanded engine and understanding they've cultivated for so long, and Starfield was so different that it required a lot of rethinking...so maybe, juuuuust maybe, ESVI will be fine.
No man’s sky continues free updates still have me hooked
Same here. One of the few games that is worth paying for, and is frequently on sale.
I dont get the No man’s sky and starfield comparison except from space its totally a deferent game
You can really tell they are free. All of them are barebones and unfinished, and always introduce a ton of new bugs that break the game. I'd rather pay for proper DLC.
I somehow dont understand the prising of no mans sky. I played it long enough to realize it is empty game with no content.
@@jaroslavpesek6642 Yet still far more things to do than Starfield.
1:11 I don't think this is the "own" this person thinks it is. Bethesda is making literally 0 money from the older games on this list. There could be 5 million people playing FO4 and it wouldn't really matter since even if someone JUST bought it the game is almost always on sale.
Depends as there’s a lot of DLC for those games. For how old they are, they’ll be making money from them somewhere.
If a game that you just made is being outperformed by a game that was made nearly 10 years ago that is about as big of an L as you could possibly take.
Starfield didn't sell particularly well, starfield was a terrible exclusive for the platform that they are owned by, It has the most negative reviews out of any main line Bethesda game and It's expansion only served to make its review score even worse.
@@TheStrengthScholar I think RDR2 showed to everyone what a real AAA should look like.
Bethesda though they could get away selling a space mod for FO4 for the price of a AAA game and nobody would complain or notice... Big mistake.
If I were you I'd order a MAID kit and use it immediately 😅
Was confused at Skyrim for a moment there. Then I realized they used the special edition version that came out 7 years later and not the original from 2011
it's those peoples problems who still believe this game and bought it
$30 dollars for 4 hours of gameplay? That price should be lower than that or at least add more ‘better’ content to that worth of $30. The future of Elder Scrolls and Fallout might not be good than we hoped for…
LMAO bro are you a sheep? do you ever think? it was already obvious that any future Bethesda game is doomed to fail since FALLOUT 4 since that game was already pretty bad and bland. Heck, did you forgot Fallout 76? ONLY NOW you have doubts? YOU SERIOUSLY hoped anything from Bethesda after their huge disasters would be good? Bruh how many more bad games do they have to make before you wake up?
They wont do anything better cause the sheep still give money and never wake up sadly. Starfield still dont even has maps lmao
4hrs of gameplay 😂😂 Bruh wut? Maybe if you speed run the main story for clips and hate clicks like this content creator did.
@@SistaCitizen
Does Bethesda pay you to defend bad games or are you an employee? We literally see absolute garbage, the bottom of the barrel and you speak about hate? My man this game doesn't even has reflection in the mirror or something as basic as an area map. Its the absolute bottom of the barrel that exists right now if you want to play a RPG
Accept it, stop supporting trash and move on to better games.
@@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi First off, I am a female. I'm not your man. Secondly not only is there an area map, its 3d now. 3rdly, a good RPG player could play in an empty room. And lastly, lol tell it to my subs that I need to move on😂, unlike this creator, I actually play the game, not just make hate clips about it to make cash off of toxic folks like yourself.
@@SistaCitizen
Congratulations, you got an area map for cities. Something Bethesda games many years ago launched with but for everywhere. Same with transporation, hooray the progress.
You literally admitted that a "good RPG player" according to you is content with even the worst garbage served, that just means you have no standards and is pretty sad that you are happy with the bottom of the barrel as if its something good.
We all played the game, thats why we criticize it and rate it as the trash that it is - cause we have simply seen better. I know, rocket science since we all have to be haters that never played the game right? Guess how I know that the game has no reflections in 2024 while games 6 years ago looked better and ran fine on a 1070.
If you want an actual RPG with choices where not everybody is an invulnerable NPC, even those that tell you in your face they are going to kill you, please play Mass Effect, New Vegas or Dragon Age Origins. Expand your horizon a bit, your standards are very, very low.
Literally just got an ad on this video about the DLC. No joke, And I’ve never seen the ad before.