Thank you for watching! What do you think about America's 6th Generation Fighter Jet? Comment "1" if you liked the video. Don't forget to like and share your thoughts! NEW Iran Hypersonic Missile Can Destroy US In 40 Sec: ruclips.net/video/ChHNpNMDZfc/видео.html
The development of the 6th generation fighter jet by the United States is an important strategic step in maintaining military superiority, ensuring national security, and encouraging economic and technological growth. By continuing to push the boundaries of innovation, the United States can prepare itself to meet future challenges in an ever-changing global security environment 😘🥰😘🥰😘🥰
@@Top10Military68 OK, shall we only do the known facts?, rather than this very juvenile US propaganda we hear from you? Explain this? 1:05 ... You make the claim of them being virtually invisible to all known radars? When we already know that claim is obsolete, untrue, and only US propaganda, so why make that claim? You see, unlike you, I can prove what I'm saying, and by only talking the real facts. Being English, it really is embarrassing reading and listening to you Americans, today, who we see endlessly claiming (for a perfect example), the F-22, is so much better than the SU-57, that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? We all read this from so many of you, and we read it endlessly. Why? I mean it really is so juvenile, as the clear and obvious facts, are, none of you have any idea what the RCS, of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified. So, really, what is it all about? Explain this outright stupidity? The Americans, never ask any of the really obvious, and most important questions, (as they all just assume so much). But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or in fact, the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect, track and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You see I've come to find, none of you have any idea, whatsoever. Again, what is it all about? Yet, if they had just asked themselves that one, really obvious important question, then maybe, they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think! As I'll explain... Seemingly, the Americans don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar). Do you understand? Therefore to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter, for targeting purposes. So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS, (we read them all believing means so much), If they're being detected, tracked and targeted by long wave radar?, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and stand out, like a beacon in the night. We also know, that neither the APG-77 radar used in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar used in the F-35, have any kind of long wave radar (hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means? It's horrifying in all truth. But, this is also a fact, the US air force will, obviously, be fully aware of. Only it seems the reality is, that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft, to think about as a potential threat! So, obviously, we must ask what no American ever asks, (but they all just assume), like, just what do either the F-22 or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? -- They only have AWACS, (that can transfer all targeting data to the F-22/F-35's in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why, actually understanding any potential adversaries real capabilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact. As, on the other hand, we find the SU-57, is equipped with a new 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), the new Byelka, (2band) radar, used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today. Russia has designed, and they've developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data", gets processed in real time, (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR. This new radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas), make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types. They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, long before they enter Russian airspace, today, (from much greater distances), with "real-time" data from all Russian, ground, (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system. Russia's new, (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 Multifunctional Integrated Radio Electronic System (MIRES), on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75, Checkmate. We should also understand, that Russia tested, and they passed this new radar suit in the SU-35, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35. Seeing the SU-35, then at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted, and shot down from BVR, by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35, equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR. Seeing the all-important, and huge, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky. The actual facts are, this new Russian 5th generation radar, provides genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including... Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters. High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas. High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection]. The Tikhomirov, NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology that will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars. These are the facts, and these facts are 100%, the exact opposite, to what we endlessly read from the Americans! And claiming the US has a 6th gen aircraft is a lie, they have no such thing today, so why make it up? Explain all of this, and all these really juvenile lies for those of us with an education, and an understanding of today's military realities?
@@Top10Military68 Explain what it is you think you could ever achieve by putting out videos that are all untrue, nothing factual about any of them, but all of them really are so juvenile, it's an embarrassment to see them? You know absolutely nothing about these aircraft, or any of today's military, and your very own videos prove this fact?
@@Top10Military68 Keep learning... We also see the F-35, completely misunderstood, by all of you uneducated Americans today! The F-35B, was claimed to be a stealthy single engine multirole combat aircraft, that unlike the Harrier, would be supersonic, stealthy, with modern avionics systems, and like the Harrier, would be VTOL capable. This is why we originally designed the two carriers without ramps. Only one of the biggest technical headaches, we always had when building the Harrier, was the VTOL, - transferring from "lift" (downward nozzles), to "forward flight" (rear-facing nozzles), to then fly away from the lift-off. Apparently to achieve it took a hell of a lot of technical work, (three - four months at a time, over 3 years). Look up all the variants they made, but they never gave up, and they finally figured it out. I made the claim, long before we saw the F-35B, that it wouldn't be VTOL capable, (even with the Rolls-Royce lift engines), because, the US has tried to produce and build a VTOL fighter aircraft many times before, only they've failed each time, only ever managing to produce and build the British AV-8 Sea Harrier, able to do so. Every US airframe, (and there have been many), have all failed. Copy and paste “2013 MCAS Yuma Air Show - AV8B Harrier Demo” into RUclips search. At 7 mins, 50 seconds, you'll watch a Harrier performing an actual VTOL. You'll see it lift off vertically, and then fly away from the lift-off, and you'll see the transfer of nozzles take place. Yet, you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a full VTOL. Yet Lockheed Martin do claim it is VTOL capable, when clearly, it's not. Copy and Paste “First F-35B Vertical Takeoff” into RUclips search. You'll see it lift off, only then you'll see it return straight back down from the lift-off. You'll never see it fly away from the lift-off! -- Believe me, if it could, we'd see footage of it doing so absolutely everywhere -- like we still see with most of the footage of the Harrier doing so. But you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a VTOL. Yet, they're supposed to be, carrier-based aircraft, only, now meaning, that any slight damage to the deck or ramp, and they're unable to get the aircraft airborne! Defeating the entire purpose of having the aircraft in the first place! You can't ever lose an entire carrier, in battle, for only minor damage?, I mean goodness me, whatever next? So, why is the US lying about this? It's obviously because, the US is still a country that's never managed to produce & build a VTOL fighter aircraft. Britain did so in the late 50s, Russia did so in the late 60s, the USA has tried and failed numerous times, so it seems this time, they're going to try to lie about it, LOL. That country is a travesty, man! But it does show us, that Lockheed do indeed, produce propaganda aircraft, as the F-22 is exactly the same. A failed aircraft, so today, only being used for propaganda purposes! Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in air-to-air combat? It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15? We find that none had any offensive capabilities, most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned, if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down! So it's again, just a silly meaningless propaganda claim. However, there's another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against aircraft just as capable, and just as well armed as itself, (only it's not American, so you'll never hear about it). The British Sea Harrier, is actually, the (only) aircraft unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against worthy, viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed. The truth is, the Americans should all be questioning why the US government made it illegal to sell the F-22? Yet they never do? The US government, seemingly want it believed, that because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense. As the facts are, they've no idea what's just around the corner in new modern military technologies, (and with the speed we're seeing so much, new, hi tech military tactical hardware, being designed, developed, and created today), it could well have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works). If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit! Yet, as always, there's another, and much more likely, reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense, to design and build them, they can't just write them off. So the US have then only used the F-22 for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out, that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell? Logically thinking, that's the only real possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. -- It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft. Well 20 years, the US have had the F-22 in service, and they've been in wars the entire time, yet they've never used it, not once! And even more telling, was, after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the US removed every F-22 from right across the Middle East... Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan. Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee that we'll never see the F-22 involved in any real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk. They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.
@@Top10Military68 You couldn't discuss a single thing about anything military, as your videos prove, you know nothing about any of it, and I really do mean nothing.
Ag please America can`t even make the F35V mission worthy after how many years and how many billions. LOL It will take them even longer with this if they can at all!
Thank you for watching! What do you think about America's 6th Generation Fighter Jet? Comment "1" if you liked the video. Don't forget to like and share your thoughts!
NEW Iran Hypersonic Missile Can Destroy US In 40 Sec: ruclips.net/video/ChHNpNMDZfc/видео.html
You must be one of the most uneducated individuals, we can find on RUclips.
The development of the 6th generation fighter jet by the United States is an important strategic step in maintaining military superiority, ensuring national security, and encouraging economic and technological growth. By continuing to push the boundaries of innovation, the United States can prepare itself to meet future challenges in an ever-changing global security environment 😘🥰😘🥰😘🥰
Looks good in CGI. Where is it in reality?
An absolutely incredible aircraft
Thank you! We're excited to share more about this groundbreaking technology on Top 10 Military!
@@Top10Military68 OK, shall we only do the known facts?, rather than this very juvenile US propaganda we hear from you? Explain this? 1:05 ... You make the claim of them being virtually invisible to all known radars? When we already know that claim is obsolete, untrue, and only US propaganda, so why make that claim?
You see, unlike you, I can prove what I'm saying, and by only talking the real facts.
Being English, it really is embarrassing reading and listening to you Americans, today, who we see endlessly claiming (for a perfect example), the F-22, is so much better than the SU-57, that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? We all read this from so many of you, and we read it endlessly. Why?
I mean it really is so juvenile, as the clear and obvious facts, are, none of you have any idea what the RCS, of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified. So, really, what is it all about? Explain this outright stupidity?
The Americans, never ask any of the really obvious, and most important questions, (as they all just assume so much). But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or in fact, the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect, track and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You see I've come to find, none of you have any idea, whatsoever. Again, what is it all about?
Yet, if they had just asked themselves that one, really obvious important question, then maybe, they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think! As I'll explain...
Seemingly, the Americans don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar). Do you understand?
Therefore to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter, for targeting purposes.
So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS, (we read them all believing means so much), If they're being detected, tracked and targeted by long wave radar?, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and stand out, like a beacon in the night.
We also know, that neither the APG-77 radar used in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar used in the F-35, have any kind of long wave radar (hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means? It's horrifying in all truth.
But, this is also a fact, the US air force will, obviously, be fully aware of. Only it seems the reality is, that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft, to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must ask what no American ever asks, (but they all just assume), like, just what do either the F-22 or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
-- They only have AWACS, (that can transfer all targeting data to the F-22/F-35's in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why, actually understanding any potential adversaries real capabilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
As, on the other hand, we find the SU-57, is equipped with a new 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), the new Byelka, (2band) radar, used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and they've developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data", gets processed in real time, (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas), make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, long before they enter Russian airspace, today, (from much greater distances), with "real-time" data from all Russian, ground, (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system.
Russia's new, (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 Multifunctional Integrated Radio Electronic System (MIRES), on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75, Checkmate.
We should also understand, that Russia tested, and they passed this new radar suit in the SU-35, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35. Seeing the SU-35, then at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted, and shot down from BVR, by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35, equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important, and huge, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky.
The actual facts are, this new Russian 5th generation radar, provides genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters. High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov, NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology that will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
These are the facts, and these facts are 100%, the exact opposite, to what we endlessly read from the Americans! And claiming the US has a 6th gen aircraft is a lie, they have no such thing today, so why make it up?
Explain all of this, and all these really juvenile lies for those of us with an education, and an understanding of today's military realities?
@@Top10Military68 You sound all of about, 15 years old.
@@Top10Military68 Explain what it is you think you could ever achieve by putting out videos that are all untrue, nothing factual about any of them, but all of them really are so juvenile, it's an embarrassment to see them? You know absolutely nothing about these aircraft, or any of today's military, and your very own videos prove this fact?
@@Top10Military68 Keep learning... We also see the F-35, completely misunderstood, by all of you uneducated Americans today!
The F-35B, was claimed to be a stealthy single engine multirole combat aircraft, that unlike the Harrier, would be supersonic, stealthy, with modern avionics systems, and like the Harrier, would be VTOL capable. This is why we originally designed the two carriers without ramps.
Only one of the biggest technical headaches, we always had when building the Harrier, was the VTOL, - transferring from "lift" (downward nozzles), to "forward flight" (rear-facing nozzles), to then fly away from the lift-off. Apparently to achieve it took a hell of a lot of technical work, (three - four months at a time, over 3 years). Look up all the variants they made, but they never gave up, and they finally figured it out.
I made the claim, long before we saw the F-35B, that it wouldn't be VTOL capable, (even with the Rolls-Royce lift engines), because, the US has tried to produce and build a VTOL fighter aircraft many times before, only they've failed each time, only ever managing to produce and build the British AV-8 Sea Harrier, able to do so. Every US airframe, (and there have been many), have all failed.
Copy and paste “2013 MCAS Yuma Air Show - AV8B Harrier Demo” into RUclips search. At 7 mins, 50 seconds, you'll watch a Harrier performing an actual VTOL. You'll see it lift off vertically, and then fly away from the lift-off, and you'll see the transfer of nozzles take place. Yet, you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a full VTOL.
Yet Lockheed Martin do claim it is VTOL capable, when clearly, it's not. Copy and Paste “First F-35B Vertical Takeoff” into RUclips search. You'll see it lift off, only then you'll see it return straight back down from the lift-off. You'll never see it fly away from the lift-off! -- Believe me, if it could, we'd see footage of it doing so absolutely everywhere -- like we still see with most of the footage of the Harrier doing so. But you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a VTOL.
Yet, they're supposed to be, carrier-based aircraft, only, now meaning, that any slight damage to the deck or ramp, and they're unable to get the aircraft airborne! Defeating the entire purpose of having the aircraft in the first place! You can't ever lose an entire carrier, in battle, for only minor damage?, I mean goodness me, whatever next?
So, why is the US lying about this? It's obviously because, the US is still a country that's never managed to produce & build a VTOL fighter aircraft. Britain did so in the late 50s, Russia did so in the late 60s, the USA has tried and failed numerous times, so it seems this time, they're going to try to lie about it, LOL.
That country is a travesty, man! But it does show us, that Lockheed do indeed, produce propaganda aircraft, as the F-22 is exactly the same. A failed aircraft, so today, only being used for propaganda purposes!
Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in air-to-air combat? It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15? We find that none had any offensive capabilities, most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned, if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down! So it's again, just a silly meaningless propaganda claim.
However, there's another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against aircraft just as capable, and just as well armed as itself, (only it's not American, so you'll never hear about it). The British Sea Harrier, is actually, the (only) aircraft unbeaten in air-to-air combat, that has faced off against worthy, viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed.
The truth is, the Americans should all be questioning why the US government made it illegal to sell the F-22? Yet they never do? The US government, seemingly want it believed, that because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense.
As the facts are, they've no idea what's just around the corner in new modern military technologies, (and with the speed we're seeing so much, new, hi tech military tactical hardware, being designed, developed, and created today), it could well have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works).
If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit! Yet, as always, there's another, and much more likely, reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22.
If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense, to design and build them, they can't just write them off. So the US have then only used the F-22 for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out, that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell?
Logically thinking, that's the only real possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. -- It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft.
Well 20 years, the US have had the F-22 in service, and they've been in wars the entire time, yet they've never used it, not once! And even more telling, was, after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the US removed every F-22 from right across the Middle East... Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan.
Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee that we'll never see the F-22 involved in any real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk. They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.
Tired of the usual banter. Nothing new not already hashed and rehashed.
this is all still crap compared to the Foo Fighters they secretly have
Interesting perspective! The advancements in aviation technology are always fascinating to discuss. Thanks for watching Top 10 Military
@@Top10Military68 You couldn't discuss a single thing about anything military, as your videos prove, you know nothing about any of it, and I really do mean nothing.
The USA has no aircraft able to defeat a SU-35, is the actual truth.
Ever wonder how worldwide health and poverty could be wiped out if USA spent that much on something good?
Ag please America can`t even make the F35V mission worthy after how many years and how many billions. LOL It will take them even longer with this if they can at all!
You said it's here, well where is it. Click bait👎
@@waynemoy5471 same old chit. Nothing new. Rehashing old already released information. Tiresome.
Misleading vid
Thumbs down