Видео

The PAK-DA is still under development. Its stealth capabilities are classified. We look forward to more information being released in the future.

Thanks for sharing your perspective! It's always interesting to hear different viewpoints on military tech. Keep the conversation going!

The B-2 remains a potent asset. However, the evolution of military technology is rapid. We anticipate advancements in the near future.

We strive for accuracy in our content. While there's always room for debate, we base our analyses on available information. Thank you for your feedback.

Thank you for your comment! While the PAK-DA is still under development, our video focuses on the potential capabilities and implications of this new Russian aircraft. We've based our analysis on available information and expert opinions. Feel free to share your thoughts and any additional insights you may have!

@@Top10Military68 then you have to get your tenses correct. The word "defeats" means it has happened already.

The PAK-DA is still under development. Technological advancements happen rapidly. Let's wait for its completion to make accurate comparisons.

The PAK-DA is still under development, and its capabilities are yet to be fully revealed.

Thanks for your comment! The power of those afterburners is impressive, but there's always room for discussion on their effectiveness. We appreciate your thoughts!

It was by pure luck as the bay doors of the F117 was open. After hundreds of sorties by the F117 being conducted through the same area using the exact same flight path. A 1 percent success rate based on luck isn't proof of anything.

@@cubed0724 Its proof that US stealth is overrated, and excuses are pitiful because it ended the f-117, a fact.

@@paulroberts7429 No, it didn't end the career, that's not a fact. The F117s were still conducting missions after the lucky shot. It's not an excuse, if it was a fact as you mentioned than a lot more F117 would of been shotdown. Again one out of hundreds of successful missions, that's luck. The US already had better stealth before the F117 was shot down once, these are just facts. US didn't even care to recover the F117 given how it was outdated. Remember it flew hundreds of mission successfully against the same SAM and radars the Soviets used to shoot down the F117. Russia military is just bad.

@@cubed0724 The Russian SU-57 with its supermaneuverability 3D thrust vectoring is superior to F-22 2d vectoring and single engines f-35 in a dogfight, a fact, before you use the excuse to hide inferior engineering of f-22 2D vectoring, Russia's R-37M hypersonic air-to-air missile mach-6 hold the record for BVR kill, US hypersonic is trash, your dead, stop crying.

@@paulroberts7429 No, the F22 has 2D thrust vectoring because 3D isn't better for air combat and the numbers prove that, also 3D would compromise its stealth. It would be easy for the US to add 3D vectoring to the F22 if it didn't compromise its stealth and actually improved air combat. It already has more than enough maneuverability for the SU57. This is why the SU57 is detectable while the F22 is not even though the SU57 being considered 5th gen, it's actually barely 4.5 gen. The F35 would destroy the SU57 before the SU57 could engage it let alone detect it and that's a fact. As for hypersonic, you clearly don't understand what or how hypersonic works. All the R37M is just a ballistic missile attached to a fighter jet of which ALL ballistic missiles travel at hypersonic speeds. The US has been doing this for decades. US has unmatched hypersonic technology and currently has an operational hypersonic aircraft called SR72, the US is way far ahead of Russia and China in hypersonic technology. The Kinzhal, lol, Russia's famed invincible hypersonic missile, has been intercepted by outdated patriot missiles and has been proven as just a ballistic missile. Russia doesn't nor hasn't had a true maneuverable hypersonic missile. The US has MAKO, which is the first true hypersonic maneuverable missile. You are so blind and seriously your comments are so hilarious as well as wrong.

That's a bold prediction.While it's impossible to say definitively when the PAK-DA will enter service, the development timeline for such a complex aircraft is typically much shorter. Many experts believe that the PAK-DA could be operational within the next decade. Would you like to discuss other potential timelines or factors influencing the PAK-DA's development?

PAK-DA might be potentially under financed for the creation of su 75 and mig 41 making the production slow compared to american military creations also the year 2069 is a joke about how slow the production might be

B-2 Spirit: While the B-2 has been deployed in various combat operations, including the Kosovo War, Afghanistan, and Iraq, its primary role has been precision bombing and surveillance. It hasn't engaged in direct dogfights or sustained ground combat.

Thank you for watching! The comparison between these stealth bombers is indeed intense. Stay tuned for more military tech insights on *Top 10 Military*!