Thanks for watching! What are your thoughts on the Russian stealth bomber vs. the B-2 Spirit? Comment below and let's discuss! Also, check out our latest video on Russia's massive FAB-300 bomb: ruclips.net/video/_VkCbqVjM3A/видео.html
Thank you for your comment! While the PAK-DA is still under development, our video focuses on the potential capabilities and implications of this new Russian aircraft. We've based our analysis on available information and expert opinions. Feel free to share your thoughts and any additional insights you may have!
That's a bold prediction.While it's impossible to say definitively when the PAK-DA will enter service, the development timeline for such a complex aircraft is typically much shorter. Many experts believe that the PAK-DA could be operational within the next decade. Would you like to discuss other potential timelines or factors influencing the PAK-DA's development?
PAK-DA might be potentially under financed for the creation of su 75 and mig 41 making the production slow compared to american military creations also the year 2069 is a joke about how slow the production might be
Thanks for your comment! The power of those afterburners is impressive, but there's always room for discussion on their effectiveness. We appreciate your thoughts!
We strive for accuracy in our content. While there's always room for debate, we base our analyses on available information. Thank you for your feedback.
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. B2 is over 20 years old now. And Russia does not even have anything, not even a concept flying and you claim what? buwahahahahahahahahahahaahaha... Oh by the way, we raise your concept with the B-21 Raider now flying.
B-2 Spirit: While the B-2 has been deployed in various combat operations, including the Kosovo War, Afghanistan, and Iraq, its primary role has been precision bombing and surveillance. It hasn't engaged in direct dogfights or sustained ground combat.
What a stupid statement.. Russian bomber beats B2 … in what ? Air to air combat? They dont turn … look it’s the people behind the equipment… the resolve of dedication.. no one machine brings victory. The people do ..
Thank you for watching! The comparison between these stealth bombers is indeed intense. Stay tuned for more military tech insights on *Top 10 Military*!
No chance…. It’s a dead duck from the start… same with chinas… you can’t have engines like that now…. That’s why the B-1 is now a tactical not strategic aircraft
It was by pure luck as the bay doors of the F117 was open. After hundreds of sorties by the F117 being conducted through the same area using the exact same flight path. A 1 percent success rate based on luck isn't proof of anything.
@@paulroberts7429 No, it didn't end the career, that's not a fact. The F117s were still conducting missions after the lucky shot. It's not an excuse, if it was a fact as you mentioned than a lot more F117 would of been shotdown. Again one out of hundreds of successful missions, that's luck. The US already had better stealth before the F117 was shot down once, these are just facts. US didn't even care to recover the F117 given how it was outdated. Remember it flew hundreds of mission successfully against the same SAM and radars the Soviets used to shoot down the F117. Russia military is just bad.
@@cubed0724 The Russian SU-57 with its supermaneuverability 3D thrust vectoring is superior to F-22 2d vectoring and single engines f-35 in a dogfight, a fact, before you use the excuse to hide inferior engineering of f-22 2D vectoring, Russia's R-37M hypersonic air-to-air missile mach-6 hold the record for BVR kill, US hypersonic is trash, your dead, stop crying.
@@paulroberts7429 No, the F22 has 2D thrust vectoring because 3D isn't better for air combat and the numbers prove that, also 3D would compromise its stealth. It would be easy for the US to add 3D vectoring to the F22 if it didn't compromise its stealth and actually improved air combat. It already has more than enough maneuverability for the SU57. This is why the SU57 is detectable while the F22 is not even though the SU57 being considered 5th gen, it's actually barely 4.5 gen. The F35 would destroy the SU57 before the SU57 could engage it let alone detect it and that's a fact. As for hypersonic, you clearly don't understand what or how hypersonic works. All the R37M is just a ballistic missile attached to a fighter jet of which ALL ballistic missiles travel at hypersonic speeds. The US has been doing this for decades. US has unmatched hypersonic technology and currently has an operational hypersonic aircraft called SR72, the US is way far ahead of Russia and China in hypersonic technology. The Kinzhal, lol, Russia's famed invincible hypersonic missile, has been intercepted by outdated patriot missiles and has been proven as just a ballistic missile. Russia doesn't nor hasn't had a true maneuverable hypersonic missile. The US has MAKO, which is the first true hypersonic maneuverable missile. You are so blind and seriously your comments are so hilarious as well as wrong.
Thanks for watching! What are your thoughts on the Russian stealth bomber vs. the B-2 Spirit? Comment below and let's discuss! Also, check out our latest video on Russia's massive FAB-300 bomb:
ruclips.net/video/_VkCbqVjM3A/видео.html
There is not even a prototype of PAK-DA yet. How can you make a claim like that in the title?
Thank you for your comment! While the PAK-DA is still under development, our video focuses on the potential capabilities and implications of this new Russian aircraft. We've based our analysis on available information and expert opinions. Feel free to share your thoughts and any additional insights you may have!
@@Top10Military68 then you have to get your tenses correct. The word "defeats" means it has happened already.
Still 20 yrs behind the B-2
The PAK-DA is still under development. Technological advancements happen rapidly. Let's wait for its completion to make accurate comparisons.
Pretty misleading to say a plane that doesn't exist defeats a plane that's actually real. The title alone earned this video a thumbs down.
it will be added to russian military inventory at year 2069
That's a bold prediction.While it's impossible to say definitively when the PAK-DA will enter service, the development timeline for such a complex aircraft is typically much shorter. Many experts believe that the PAK-DA could be operational within the next decade. Would you like to discuss other potential timelines or factors influencing the PAK-DA's development?
PAK-DA might be potentially under financed for the creation of su 75 and mig 41 making the production slow compared to american military creations also the year 2069 is a joke about how slow the production might be
congrats, while russia is trying to match a 90´s era aircraft, US is on its way reshaping the world of aerial combat
Russian stealth bomber alright! Never seen it sure stealthy.
The PAK-DA is still under development. Its stealth capabilities are classified. We look forward to more information being released in the future.
Look at those beautiful big ass afterburners?!!! Absolute joke 🤡🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣
Thanks for your comment! The power of those afterburners is impressive, but there's always room for discussion on their effectiveness. We appreciate your thoughts!
The B2 is a flying museum piece to what is shortly to replace it
The B-2 remains a potent asset. However, the evolution of military technology is rapid. We anticipate advancements in the near future.
China did not develop stealth, they took it from Lockheed
Clickbait 🤭
We strive for accuracy in our content. While there's always room for debate, we base our analyses on available information. Thank you for your feedback.
This plane doesn't even exist yet, you need to change the title or something, only thing this has DEFEATS is logic
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. B2 is over 20 years old now. And Russia does not even have anything, not even a concept flying and you claim what? buwahahahahahahahahahahaahaha... Oh by the way, we raise your concept with the B-21 Raider now flying.
when have they been in combat against each country in serious actual combat.
B-2 Spirit: While the B-2 has been deployed in various combat operations, including the Kosovo War, Afghanistan, and Iraq, its primary role has been precision bombing and surveillance. It hasn't engaged in direct dogfights or sustained ground combat.
I highly doubt it 😂
Thanks for sharing your perspective! It's always interesting to hear different viewpoints on military tech. Keep the conversation going!
There is no such Russian bomber. Russian military battle power will take at least 10 years to be viable again after their ongoing defeat in Ukraine.
What a stupid statement.. Russian bomber beats B2 … in what ? Air to air combat? They dont turn … look it’s the people behind the equipment… the resolve of dedication.. no one machine brings victory. The people do ..
like hell
Thank you for watching! The comparison between these stealth bombers is indeed intense. Stay tuned for more military tech insights on *Top 10 Military*!
No chance…. It’s a dead duck from the start… same with chinas… you can’t have engines like that now…. That’s why the B-1 is now a tactical not strategic aircraft
Not a chance🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡
The PAK-DA is still under development, and its capabilities are yet to be fully revealed.
Sounds like Propaganda to me, Dream on Putler !
Top 10 Military stfu..baseless info.😌
Rubbish talk 😂😂😂
HAHAHA!!! Cheap copy of the B-2
F-117 was hailed as invisible until Yugoslavia's Russian made radar shot it down and ended it.
It was by pure luck as the bay doors of the F117 was open. After hundreds of sorties by the F117 being conducted through the same area using the exact same flight path. A 1 percent success rate based on luck isn't proof of anything.
@@cubed0724 Its proof that US stealth is overrated, and excuses are pitiful because it ended the f-117, a fact.
@@paulroberts7429 No, it didn't end the career, that's not a fact. The F117s were still conducting missions after the lucky shot. It's not an excuse, if it was a fact as you mentioned than a lot more F117 would of been shotdown. Again one out of hundreds of successful missions, that's luck. The US already had better stealth before the F117 was shot down once, these are just facts. US didn't even care to recover the F117 given how it was outdated. Remember it flew hundreds of mission successfully against the same SAM and radars the Soviets used to shoot down the F117. Russia military is just bad.
@@cubed0724 The Russian SU-57 with its supermaneuverability 3D thrust vectoring is superior to F-22 2d vectoring and single engines f-35 in a dogfight, a fact, before you use the excuse to hide inferior engineering of f-22 2D vectoring, Russia's R-37M hypersonic air-to-air missile mach-6 hold the record for BVR kill, US hypersonic is trash, your dead, stop crying.
@@paulroberts7429 No, the F22 has 2D thrust vectoring because 3D isn't better for air combat and the numbers prove that, also 3D would compromise its stealth. It would be easy for the US to add 3D vectoring to the F22 if it didn't compromise its stealth and actually improved air combat. It already has more than enough maneuverability for the SU57. This is why the SU57 is detectable while the F22 is not even though the SU57 being considered 5th gen, it's actually barely 4.5 gen. The F35 would destroy the SU57 before the SU57 could engage it let alone detect it and that's a fact. As for hypersonic, you clearly don't understand what or how hypersonic works. All the R37M is just a ballistic missile attached to a fighter jet of which ALL ballistic missiles travel at hypersonic speeds. The US has been doing this for decades. US has unmatched hypersonic technology and currently has an operational hypersonic aircraft called SR72, the US is way far ahead of Russia and China in hypersonic technology. The Kinzhal, lol, Russia's famed invincible hypersonic missile, has been intercepted by outdated patriot missiles and has been proven as just a ballistic missile. Russia doesn't nor hasn't had a true maneuverable hypersonic missile. The US has MAKO, which is the first true hypersonic maneuverable missile. You are so blind and seriously your comments are so hilarious as well as wrong.
😂😂😂😂😂😂