Yeah, that was surprising and pretty funny. One of the recommended videos is one of his older ones "[978] Opening a Locked Door With Movie Film" like there's of course a better way to open something but by using a strange or common object it makes a much better title.
@@hetznaz7902 This is the Xiaomi Wiha 24 in 1 Precision Screwdriver Kit it's really good set and it's cheap i use mine for phone repairs and other struff and it's amazing.
I like that he could have easily padded it out to get to the magical 10 minute monetization level but didn't. Unlike a lot of RUclipsrs, if I see a LPL video that comes in at 10:06, I will know it was that length because that was what it needed to be, not so he could get the extra ad in.
To be fair, LPL had to use some amount of brute force to get to the vulnerable bits. It wasn't like things just popped off with a tiny bit of pressure. Sure it's not bolt cutters, but the screws weren't exposed in a way that was accessible without causing some sort of (cosmetic) damage to the lock.
@@zeph769 I don't know if you were being sarcastic or not, but in case you weren't, that was the joke. Taking it out of context to make it seem like LPL found the lock to be 'ok', when he really wasn't.
I wouldn't have thought the first "ok" in the name was pronounced "okay" - I'd call it "ock-lock". ( alternatively I suppose, it could be "okay-low-kay" )
@@alisa9040 No he touched the fingerprint reader, it was telling him he had the wrong print. Locks like this don't usually have any external connectivity.
Hey man! Glad to see you breaking the format a lil bit! Don't get me wrong, I really, REALLY like your format, but some variety is nice, specially on a guy who is so intersting to hear talking like you. I bet different formats will be as intersting, because what's intersting is hearing you talk and share your knowledge.
“Oh, I forgot the key to my briefcase. Let me just take out the disc detainer pick that Bosnian Bill and I made..... Click on 1, 2 is binding, 3 is loose, 4 is set, 2 is set, and we’re in”
So with an attack like this, you would have a second undamaged lock for the video right? Do you usually plan ahead and order tow of the same locks just in case or will you re-order the lock?
@@rcytray Actually this video seems to be a good demo too. That set contains only miniature bits, and if those whitstand these abuse, then it must be a good quality set.
You probably could get away with shorting just one set of contacts instead of two like you showed. Often circuit designers take a shortcut and only control one side of a motor, leaving the other side permanently attached to either the ground reference or the positive voltage supply. (Which one really depends on the switching circuit, whether the switching circuit can supply or sink more current.) But this is only true if the motor only runs in one direction (and uses something like a spring to return it). If the motor runs in both directions, you will need to short two pairs of contacts as you demonstrated.
You right, however this needs a reverse to lock it again, (could a coil spring do this job?), a solenoid type would be ok good but more prone to a magnet attack.
@@thor52916 The fact that the DC motor can go backwards doesn't mean that it does to lock it. All DC motors can go backwards when electricity is supplied in reverse.
Very nice. The video that is. These "lock makers" have really gotta stop including externally accessible screws/panels that reveal the guts of these things. They aren't locks, they're a puzzle with an easy solution. Cheers for a good bypass video!
Aye, especially when they are this cheap. Both of those attack vectors would be ruined by one way or breakaway screws. Then you'd have to drill the screws out.
@@jonathanfairchild Agreed. So many of them seem like they're more about being a cool techy thing to show your friends than actually lock something. Feel like the sort of thing you'd use their level of security on is the sort of thing where the lock costs as much as what you're securing. Its like why would i use this weak of a lock when instead i could replace whatever got stolen instead for the same price?
Would really enjoy seeing a series (or maybe a second channel) just showing how you come up with the exploits for different locks. Not necessarily every lock, but the ones with more interesting brainstorming sessions (finding multiple vulnerabilities, finding evidence that a method of attack was actually thought of, etc.). Awesome video as always :)
I have one lock that would be safe, at least from anything short of an angle grinder. It's a disc pad lock with a horrible core, whose mechanism got stuck. You can not even open it with the key, it simply will not turn more than an 1/8 turn. 🙈
Us: ok you can open the lock in 30 seconds when you know how it works, but surely blind it takes more time right? LPL: 3 minutes from first impressions to unlocked
@@bepowerification with experience taking things like this apart it is quite easy to find something like that in a few minutes. After working in manufacturing it would probably take me only slightly longer, and mostly because I don't have a bench with that type of tools set up.
@@sailor5853 I feel like this lock would be more secure if they just doused the damn thing in epoxy resin instead of little plastic plugs and a face plate held on with a glue stick. Given some of the stuff I've seen on this channel, I was impressed that this lock didn't have the circuit board 100% in the open after puling up the adhesive front plate piece. If they'd have soldered those screws in place or stripped out the heads, this lock wouldn't have been half bad.
@@bepowerification This lock is so poorly designed that the attack path is really obvious at first sight. All black plastic pieces are shouting "Hit me!".
I'll be honest - this is one of my favourites from you. The locks done fast thing is neat, but the exploration is super cool. I'd be happy if you did all of your videos like this going forward.
The way you "locked" it before closing the shackle seggests it has a spring loaded locking lug so could this be shimmed or rapped open? much quicker and easier and no damage.
The calm in your voice alone makes this satisfying, I think you could pick apart soapbubbles and I would still watch. Nice to see your work from a new angle.
a few observations of my own: i reckon that's just a solenoid just by the sound of it, and i think reversing the polarity didn't do anything to lock it as it would have a flyback diode to protect the circuit from a voltage spike and if that's true then only 1 jumper wire would've opened it since isolating both terminals would use more components, and i also reckon it _might_ be shimmable since there's no active locking (unless they use a square cutout in the shackle if done correctly but doubt it) - one last reckon: probably a magnet can reenact the pull of the solenoid, looks like the solenoid is mounted vertically so probably a magnet on the bottom would do the trick?
Look up other vids of these locks, it's a motor with a planetary gearset. The shackle is sprung, which is why it pops out when unlocked, and that pop noise comes from shackle's retention that keeps it from being removed entirely. Also note the, "I hear the motor move but nothing happened," with the incorrect polarity, and the, "I heard the motor move," while using the music wire, again in the incorrect polarity. This would imply that it is indeed a motor, as you can _hear it move_ and you can _hear it move while in the incorrect polarity._ Not to mention that you can _hear the _*_motor_*_ move,_ as you wouldn't be able to hear _motor noises_ from a solenoid. Plus if it were a solenoid, you'd be hearing the pop no matter the polarity, so there should have been at least four in the video as there were two tests that resulted in incorrect polarity, yet there were no pops, yet he _heard the motor move with incorrect polarity._ Basic logic tells you that your reckoning is incorrect, as the pop noise is not consistent to both polarities, and the noise is described as a motor, not to mention the comment about only needing one jumper wire didn't work in the multiple times the single jumper was used between contacts.
@@xaytana my observations were based on this video alone and my words chosen modestly - when he said he heard a noise, i didn't hear anything at all through headphones, and when he reversed the polarity to "lock" it at 4:44 i also heard no noise from the thing regardless what LPL actually said, surely it would've done if it had been unlocked just prior as it did when it went from locked to unlocked like at 4:17 as gearing would have to move from one position to another - "you wouldn't be able to hear motor noises from a solenoid" no but solenoids make very audible clicking sounds, the sound at 4:17 sounds like a solenoid click to me and not a motor whirring - i did quickly search for another video of this padlock and without digging too deep, jerryrigseverything's video comes up where a prolonged motor whirring is present as he demonstrates the product as is the planetary gearing when it cuts right through it, but idk about LPL's lock - i'd still like to see what else can be done with LPL's lock but he didn't take it apart enough for either of us to say confidently
This was one of your best videos yet.. it reminds me of the early videos.. please make a couple videos like this out of every ten or so. Frankly, you have a beautifully analytical mind and its a pleasure to watch it in action!
Hi, two questions: 1. Wouldn't you normally try the intended use of the lock first to look for less destructive exploits? 2. Would you normally buy two locks, so you can start with a fresh lock on the video? Thanks.
I don't think there are less destructive exploits since it is a fingerprint lock. The only thing I can imagine is shimming, but that wouldn't make a fun video.
@@fedorboendermaker1536 I was thinking a strong magnet might be able to open it, but seems like the wrong kind of motor. maybe I'm dumb but seemed like one that would've been good to try
@@Archimedes.5000 maybe the non-destructive way would work, but then it's a 1.5 minutes long video, out of which 45 seconds are LPL telling us how bad it is and 35 seconds are showing as the lock and the "tools" he's gonna use
Being offended by phillips screw opened with flathead when there was a correct head available. Remembering the whole channel is about opening things with wrong tools.
yes, this thinking process is nice to see. That's why I like Louis Rossmann's channel, because you see him trying to figure out stuff. Would like to see more videos like this indeed.
@@joseantoniolago5857 I've got the same set, I got mine about a year or so ago from Gearbest, but you might find them in the likes of Banggood as well. www.gearbest.com/screwdriver---screwdriver-set/pp_3003381444963741.html?wid=2000001
If this lock were to sit out in the Texas summer heat, the adhesive on the front panel would almost certainly melt enough for you to be able to pry it off without any tools or cause any damage. After that, it’s your choice as to how you want to bypass the locking mech. What an awful lock. But I wasn’t expecting much from a company called “OkLok.” They even acknowledged in their own name that their locks are only “ok.”
Pretty nice to see how you come up with those exploits. BTW, you can probably use a single bridge "wire", since it's likely the motor and battery ground are already connected.
LPL: "I'll be using a lock I have never seen or picked." Me: "Oh... so only 8 minutes for the video length, it will probably take him around 6-7 minutes to find a fault and open it. Damn, that's quick, let's watch!" LPL: *Casually opens the lock in literally 2 minutes from the moment he lays hands on it* What the cinnamon toast is this? I would never dare to start my own company of security locks. Or... might do and call it "FU LPL", with the company motto: "That's all we can protect for you today."
That depends. It does what the specification says, probably. It is built according to specification. It does not break any law-defined standard (like small parts for children toys, hazardous external paint that melts your skin, etc), probably. It might even pass some security test, it you specify that it falls into category "cannot be opened under 30seconds without steel-cutting something". Maybe. So maybe it's even better than some mechanical Masterlocks, that can be raked within 5s :D but yeah, the exposed screws are pretty much a security flaw, they could make the screws accessible only when the lock is open or something
for non destructive intrusion, was the top of the lock susceptible to having a shim wedged in like the cheap combination locks? i can't tell just from looking at the shackle.
After watching several dozen of your excellent videos, I conclude that most locks are designed to keep out all but the .05% of people (or less) that can crack them, and that’s good enough. The design reaches a point of diminishing returns, where to keep out an ever tinier fraction of elite lock pickers adds enormously to the cost, weight, and probably the complexity of the lock in ways that will never pay for itself in a business model. You have a jaded point of view, since your hard-earned expertise makes you see many of these cheaper locks as “junk” where for the average person they are as sturdy as Fort Knox. I grant that it might be otherwise: that relatively inexpensive and simple changes would make these locks much more pick resistant. If that is the case, then manufacturers have no excuse.
If it has a Battery Mostlikely one wire has power the Board then Controlls flow u can simply short together the wires if they are aside one another Or short others toghether and u will mostlikely reach what u try to reach it will prob not be the Best for the Assebly Health but if ur Breaking in thats no concern.
You could just do this with a screw driver by opening the front and bottom and riping the battery out strip the wires and using the + and - to turn on the moter
![[699] Uervoton Fingerprint Padlock Opened With a Screwdriver!!!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7Uje4pxfSlI/mqdefault.jpg)
![[699] Uervoton Fingerprint Padlock Opened With a Screwdriver!!!](/img/tr.png)
![[1422] Did I Cheat On This Challenge? (Tamper-Sealed Abus)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xUJtqvYDnkg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[1588] My 36 Inch King Dick Wrecks Locks!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7X2PuE6ELmg/mqdefault.jpg)
"I wouldn't use that, I'd use that for a catchy title"
This man is so honest he shows his own exploits
Yeah, that was surprising and pretty funny. One of the recommended videos is one of his older ones "[978] Opening a Locked Door With Movie Film" like there's of course a better way to open something but by using a strange or common object it makes a much better title.
@@chucklebutt4470 I got that one in my recommended too! So glad he did a video with Deviant Ollam
Got to defeat the youtube algorithm.
@@johnnyboy3949 - he exploits that too. RUclips doesn't even know he's picked their "lock" yet.
@@chucklebutt4470 i think because of your comment i got that movie film video as next autoplay
Takes out the sexiest screwdriver set I've ever seen, uses it to hack at plastic.
I want to know the brand so I can buy one myself. (I use mini drivers daily, and would love one that nice and compact)
@@hetznaz7902 This is the Xiaomi Wiha 24 in 1 Precision Screwdriver Kit it's really good set and it's cheap i use mine for phone repairs and other struff and it's amazing.
Kartofka91 thank you
@@Kartofka91 you. are. the. best.
Kartofka91 I doff my hat at you good sir, you have done a great service to us all
Nice to see a full length movie here sometimes.
Full length, 8 min, still found 2 ways to unlock...
@@krabeznazwy2990 LPL in a nutshell
FilingAccount -BlueAsterisk. I would have made it in two parts!
I like that he could have easily padded it out to get to the magical 10 minute monetization level but didn't. Unlike a lot of RUclipsrs, if I see a LPL video that comes in at 10:06, I will know it was that length because that was what it needed to be, not so he could get the extra ad in.
@@paulwoodard4155 Yeah I completely agree
Fans: How long does it take for you to come up with your 3-5 minute videos.
LPL: 3-5 minutes of prep.
When you're too scared of what LPL's gonna say about your lock so you name your company "OK LOCK" so he has to say that at least once
Ha ha
Big brain time
Maybe it's pronounced Oklok.
@@two_tier_gary_rumain This is how I first read it
That's how you start a scolding sentence. "OK, lock..."
LPL: The Videos are all a bit short, so I'll show the whole planning process
Whole planning process: still takes sub 5min
LPL: " hey i can just remove the screws" lock-manufacturer: " Wait, thats illegal"
hahaha, thought of the exact same wording
"How do I know that you didn't remove the screw(s)...
Not only is the warranty void,
So is our property replacement theft clause."
To be fair, LPL had to use some amount of brute force to get to the vulnerable bits. It wasn't like things just popped off with a tiny bit of pressure. Sure it's not bolt cutters, but the screws weren't exposed in a way that was accessible without causing some sort of (cosmetic) damage to the lock.
@@roguebanshee A theif would certainly be worried about legal obligations.
This lock is fine.
Wait, is that a thing lock manufacturer's say when somebody opens a lock by removing screws? Not sure if thieves know and care about that...
Their commercials gonna be:
"It's an OK lock"
Lock picking lawyer, 2020
Hey! You're doing that thing again where you take everything out of context. You're trying to make it look like I think this is an okay lock.
@@zeph769 I don't know if you were being sarcastic or not, but in case you weren't, that was the joke. Taking it out of context to make it seem like LPL found the lock to be 'ok', when he really wasn't.
@@herrvorragend1175 wow you must be fun at parties. now the joke isn't funny anymore
I wouldn't have thought the first "ok" in the name was pronounced "okay" - I'd call it "ock-lock".
( alternatively I suppose, it could be "okay-low-kay" )
I love the little red LED blinking away like it's angry at being taken apart.
I thought it was going to blow up.
Yeah, i heard little angry voice saying stuff like "hay, watcha doin? put me down, get your hands off me" etc :-)
I was thinking that too.
I think that blinking red light would probably signify that it's sending a signal to whoever had it set up, so that would be a thing.
@@alisa9040 No he touched the fingerprint reader, it was telling him he had the wrong print. Locks like this don't usually have any external connectivity.
RUclips's Auto Caption: "This is the Wok Picking Lawyer"
Me: Ohh, it's a cooking show now....
Justin Lakey This isn’t Forest Forests channel ;)
LPL level of looking for flaws and exploits in cooking gear could save a lot of people money and hassle TBH...
It has been a cooking show for a long time. All this roasting of lock makers... juicy!
Procceds to use the wok to smash the lock. "and it's open!"
Let's be honest, who wouldn't like to see LPL pick a wok?!
Hey man! Glad to see you breaking the format a lil bit! Don't get me wrong, I really, REALLY like your format, but some variety is nice, specially on a guy who is so intersting to hear talking like you. I bet different formats will be as intersting, because what's intersting is hearing you talk and share your knowledge.
@@SameGProds I'm sure he wasn't aware that so it was really nice that you let him know.
_primecode
Capital letters and full stops are optional.
@@michaelmappin8626 anything is optional on the internet
I agree, breaking format sometimes makes for interesting content for sure.
Love the shambler in Your thumbnail
And the lock in constantly blinking at him like "no, please stop, you're killing me"
LPL in court: "This is the lawyering lockpicker, and what I have for you today is a defendant falsely accused of murder."
More like breaking and entering
"So for this case i will try to use non-destructive methods, so i will just take this evidence and scream objection"
B&E, murder, and negligence. Although he had consent, which we only have his word on, his tool was too much for his ex gf's backdoor.
"Here's the defense that Bosnian Bill an I came up with"
“Oh, I forgot the key to my briefcase. Let me just take out the disc detainer pick that Bosnian Bill and I made..... Click on 1, 2 is binding, 3 is loose, 4 is set, 2 is set, and we’re in”
I just watched someone hotwire a lock
Soviet Kazkov pls upload enderman
Henry Cheeseburger ok maybe
Henry Cheeseburger Ok I did it
@@declan9876 Zombie too?
North1x maybe in a week, winter break is soon
I really loved this style of video. I hope you make lots more like this
Now that I've seen LPL reverse-engineering a circuit, I want to see Big Clive picking locks.
This lock looks like a candidate for the double wrench method.
The working methode or the one from that clickbait video
Yeah, it looks OK...
@@Reewen Real One would likely not work on this one
What's wrong with down at the range? With the Bushmaster?
That wrench video is how I found lpl
Is anyone else impressed with the dexterity of LPL? Never a misplaced step in any video.
I mean he did drop the lock like a minute in but I get what you're saying
@@flika1052 this video wasn't even like planned out like any of his others so the fact that that's the biggest misstep he made is really impressive
So with an attack like this, you would have a second undamaged lock for the video right? Do you usually plan ahead and order tow of the same locks just in case or will you re-order the lock?
Nah, he usually just uses the same lock and puts it back together as best he can.
I'd assume for one's that there is obvious damage, he'll just get another one.
You did a great job tearing down and bypassing that lock.
Before the video: Must be a fantastic lock, it's taken him 8 minutes to open!
After the video: ...Nah.
And it's an 8 minutes video of him walking to the store, buying the lock, coming back home, analyzing the flaws and opening it.
"Lets pull this bottom plug out, see if there's a better exploit down here."
Stop! Stop! He's already dead!
StrayT3chman
I read that with HL sound effects
"Up, horse, lest I flog thee again!!!"
Haha. ”Oklok” literally means unwise in Swedish!
*looks away for a second.*
LPL: "This okay lock brand."
Me: "Oh, what, praise from LPL already?"
*Reads Instruction Manual Cover" Oh...
Very interesting to see the process on one of these. Definetly intrested in more of this kind of video.
1:23 Whoa, what is that screwdriver kit? it looks pretty damn good
The kit is a Xiaomi branded Wiha kit. Just search for Xiaomi Wiha.
@@MetalheadAndNerd Found! Thank you very much.
Need one
@@MetalheadAndNerd Do I need more screwdrivers? Do I need more Xiaomi in my house. Well, now I do! Nice!!
@@MetalheadAndNerd came to the comments to find out what driver set that was. Thank you!
What mini screwdriver kit is that? Seems like a nice set.
www.gearbest.com/screwdriver---screwdriver-set/pp_3003381444963741.html?wid=2000001
Looks like this 57 in 1 set www.amazon.com/dp/B07DHHMMVC/ref=cm_sw_r_apa_i_JxeOEbZ34D7B1
more like Xiaomi Mijia Wiha. look at ebay
that anodised finish is very similar to the Xiaomi Mijia screwdriver set
@@rcytray Actually this video seems to be a good demo too. That set contains only miniature bits, and if those whitstand these abuse, then it must be a good quality set.
A heat gun would probably allow destruction free disassembly. That's my guess
for the front panel, a plastic spudger may have worked better.
Fun fact: Oklok in Swedish means unwise or ill-advised!
Truth in advertising.
Can confirm, am swedish
LUL! Nice!
You probably could get away with shorting just one set of contacts instead of two like you showed. Often circuit designers take a shortcut and only control one side of a motor, leaving the other side permanently attached to either the ground reference or the positive voltage supply. (Which one really depends on the switching circuit, whether the switching circuit can supply or sink more current.) But this is only true if the motor only runs in one direction (and uses something like a spring to return it). If the motor runs in both directions, you will need to short two pairs of contacts as you demonstrated.
You right, however this needs a reverse to lock it again, (could a coil spring do this job?), a solenoid type would be ok good but more prone to a magnet attack.
No it's a reversible drive motor which means to unlock power flows one way... to lock it flows the other
@@thor52916 The fact that the DC motor can go backwards doesn't mean that it does to lock it. All DC motors can go backwards when electricity is supplied in reverse.
@@light-master No but it reverses the cam attached to the motor back in to the locking paw to allow it to lock
Very nice. The video that is. These "lock makers" have really gotta stop including externally accessible screws/panels that reveal the guts of these things. They aren't locks, they're a puzzle with an easy solution.
Cheers for a good bypass video!
Aye, especially when they are this cheap. Both of those attack vectors would be ruined by one way or breakaway screws. Then you'd have to drill the screws out.
That's honestly why I find lock picking interesting. Locks are just puzzles under a different name.
So they didn’t even bother to epoxy up the panels together to make it harder to pry open.
Seems like a couple well placed hammer strike would be the easiest method. These electronic locks always seems so flimsy.
@@jonathanfairchild Agreed. So many of them seem like they're more about being a cool techy thing to show your friends than actually lock something. Feel like the sort of thing you'd use their level of security on is the sort of thing where the lock costs as much as what you're securing. Its like why would i use this weak of a lock when instead i could replace whatever got stolen instead for the same price?
Would really enjoy seeing a series (or maybe a second channel) just showing how you come up with the exploits for different locks. Not necessarily every lock, but the ones with more interesting brainstorming sessions (finding multiple vulnerabilities, finding evidence that a method of attack was actually thought of, etc.). Awesome video as always :)
The Lord of Locks can get through anything. No lock is safe from him.
BOWLEY lock, only around that is destructive
I have one lock that would be safe, at least from anything short of an angle grinder. It's a disc pad lock with a horrible core, whose mechanism got stuck. You can not even open it with the key, it simply will not turn more than an 1/8 turn. 🙈
More like the Lock Picking Lord
and of course, if he can't open it, He is a Lawyer, so he would simply SUE the Lock into compliance!!! LOL!
Turidus my dad who’s a locksmith suggest getting a drill and drilling in the brass cylinder, but beware it will ruin the lock
01:37 _"I'm gonna do this trying to do as little damage as possible"_ Bugger, he isn't to use the vice of knowledge, I guess.
or the hammer of X ray vision
Always an upvote for a big Clive reference :)
He needs an explosion proof pie pan to put the parts in.
Or of course the big standard swingpress (I know this has been said already but swingpress)
@@dsloop3907 ahh yes, the explosion containment pie dish
I dunno what I expected. It basically takes you 7 minutes.
Right...7 min, I was like OMG its a titan of locks. But i liked it
It’s actually like three of four
4:20 actually
@@anamarrazzaq1072 nice
Anam Arrazzaq nice timing
Love the honesty with "I'd title it something catchy"!
Us: ok you can open the lock in 30 seconds when you know how it works, but surely blind it takes more time right?
LPL: 3 minutes from first impressions to unlocked
Even though, screws are the only things that seems to slow down that man.
You really think he didnt test this with another lock first? People are naive..
@@bepowerification with experience taking things like this apart it is quite easy to find something like that in a few minutes. After working in manufacturing it would probably take me only slightly longer, and mostly because I don't have a bench with that type of tools set up.
@@sailor5853 I feel like this lock would be more secure if they just doused the damn thing in epoxy resin instead of little plastic plugs and a face plate held on with a glue stick. Given some of the stuff I've seen on this channel, I was impressed that this lock didn't have the circuit board 100% in the open after puling up the adhesive front plate piece. If they'd have soldered those screws in place or stripped out the heads, this lock wouldn't have been half bad.
@@bepowerification This lock is so poorly designed that the attack path is really obvious at first sight. All black plastic pieces are shouting "Hit me!".
"Thou shall not covet the LPL's screwdriver set."
I'm gonna have to add that to the list of "shalt nots" that I've broken. 😈
What set is it? I'd love to get one.
godefroiyt looks a bit like this one:
www.amazon.com/dp/B076TD86WN/
@@fitzmorrispr that looks like it, thanks!
OH MAN I'M COVETING!!! Lol. @lockpickinglawyer where can we get them??? Lol
I arrived early, but the lock was already picked.
Let's make an electronic lock!
Do you know anything about lock security?
No, but we know about electronics!
Ok, close enough.
I'm surprised that the LPL saying "OK lock" didn't already cause the lock to just jump open out of fear of being exposed...
That's what a Google speech recognition lock would do. Open whenever something sounded like "Ok Lock".
I'll be honest - this is one of my favourites from you. The locks done fast thing is neat, but the exploration is super cool. I'd be happy if you did all of your videos like this going forward.
The way you "locked" it before closing the shackle seggests it has a spring loaded locking lug so could this be shimmed or rapped open? much quicker and easier and no damage.
I think being able to shim a padlock is basically assumed at this point unless otherwise noted.
I was expecting at least brushing around it with a neodymium magnet, before destructive work.
rape the lock
The calm in your voice alone makes this satisfying, I think you could pick apart soapbubbles and I would still watch.
Nice to see your work from a new angle.
I would also love to see more of this kind of stuff mixed in. This was really fun and interesting to watch!
a few observations of my own: i reckon that's just a solenoid just by the sound of it, and i think reversing the polarity didn't do anything to lock it as it would have a flyback diode to protect the circuit from a voltage spike and if that's true then only 1 jumper wire would've opened it since isolating both terminals would use more components, and i also reckon it _might_ be shimmable since there's no active locking (unless they use a square cutout in the shackle if done correctly but doubt it) - one last reckon: probably a magnet can reenact the pull of the solenoid, looks like the solenoid is mounted vertically so probably a magnet on the bottom would do the trick?
*insert Elon Musk "nerd" tweet here*
all jokes aside, love to see someone geek out
Look up other vids of these locks, it's a motor with a planetary gearset. The shackle is sprung, which is why it pops out when unlocked, and that pop noise comes from shackle's retention that keeps it from being removed entirely.
Also note the, "I hear the motor move but nothing happened," with the incorrect polarity, and the, "I heard the motor move," while using the music wire, again in the incorrect polarity. This would imply that it is indeed a motor, as you can _hear it move_ and you can _hear it move while in the incorrect polarity._ Not to mention that you can _hear the _*_motor_*_ move,_ as you wouldn't be able to hear _motor noises_ from a solenoid. Plus if it were a solenoid, you'd be hearing the pop no matter the polarity, so there should have been at least four in the video as there were two tests that resulted in incorrect polarity, yet there were no pops, yet he _heard the motor move with incorrect polarity._ Basic logic tells you that your reckoning is incorrect, as the pop noise is not consistent to both polarities, and the noise is described as a motor, not to mention the comment about only needing one jumper wire didn't work in the multiple times the single jumper was used between contacts.
@@xaytana my observations were based on this video alone and my words chosen modestly - when he said he heard a noise, i didn't hear anything at all through headphones, and when he reversed the polarity to "lock" it at 4:44 i also heard no noise from the thing regardless what LPL actually said, surely it would've done if it had been unlocked just prior as it did when it went from locked to unlocked like at 4:17 as gearing would have to move from one position to another - "you wouldn't be able to hear motor noises from a solenoid" no but solenoids make very audible clicking sounds, the sound at 4:17 sounds like a solenoid click to me and not a motor whirring - i did quickly search for another video of this padlock and without digging too deep, jerryrigseverything's video comes up where a prolonged motor whirring is present as he demonstrates the product as is the planetary gearing when it cuts right through it, but idk about LPL's lock - i'd still like to see what else can be done with LPL's lock but he didn't take it apart enough for either of us to say confidently
If you don't mind, could you let us know the screwdriver you used?
www.amazon.com.au/Mi-x-Wiha-Precision-Screwdriver/dp/B07DCYW42R/ref=asc_df_B07DCYW42R/?tag=googleshopdsk-22&linkCode=df0&hvadid=341791682102&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=11381636952737888065&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=1000567&hvtargid=pla-719680180992&psc=1
Really? Ever seen small screwdriver sets?
@@wileecoyote5749 the cool set he has
I think Nick Shabazz has the same set.
@@wileecoyote5749 its about beeing max fanboi
This was one of your best videos yet.. it reminds me of the early videos.. please make a couple videos like this out of every ten or so. Frankly, you have a beautifully analytical mind and its a pleasure to watch it in action!
Feels like I just watched a classified video from an intelligence agency.
"Masterlock goes digital" would be an appropriate title for this video...
Hi, two questions:
1. Wouldn't you normally try the intended use of the lock first to look for less destructive exploits?
2. Would you normally buy two locks, so you can start with a fresh lock on the video?
Thanks.
I don't think there are less destructive exploits since it is a fingerprint lock. The only thing I can imagine is shimming, but that wouldn't make a fun video.
@@fedorboendermaker1536 Well, I'd be pretty entertained.
Its an electronic lock, so you cant pick it, so non destructive entries wouldnt really work
@@fedorboendermaker1536 I was thinking a strong magnet might be able to open it, but seems like the wrong kind of motor. maybe I'm dumb but seemed like one that would've been good to try
@@Archimedes.5000 maybe the non-destructive way would work, but then it's a 1.5 minutes long video, out of which 45 seconds are LPL telling us how bad it is and 35 seconds are showing as the lock and the "tools" he's gonna use
Being offended by phillips screw opened with flathead when there was a correct head available.
Remembering the whole channel is about opening things with wrong tools.
Marketing strategy: Sell this with "TheLockpickingLawyer said it's an 'ok lock'" on the package
"is that a screw under there" lock manufacturer: "oh deer god..."
I dont want any stinking charging port on my locks!!
they should've put a super capacitor in there with inductive charging then something to keep people from opening the front cover.
@@MichaelSanAngelo induction charging, definitely, regardless of internal power supply.
Oklok in Swedish means “unwise“.
So the sweetest translation is a good description of this lock. Kool
“Behind the curtain” still so damn embarrassing to that lousy lock manufacturer!! 👍 awesome work
That's good! If I need emergency battery I know where to get it now
yes, this thinking process is nice to see. That's why I like Louis Rossmann's channel, because you see him trying to figure out stuff.
Would like to see more videos like this indeed.
when he doesn't say "in any case, that's all I have for you today"
😲
This was fun, i'd love to see more like this one.
LPL: "So, now you've seen behind the curtain, you know the process..."
Me: "Was this not any case?"
1:23 that box looks so threatening I didn’t realize it was a screwdriver until he put it together
Putting a time stamp on an LPL video, that's the real show.
ruclips.net/video/9zrvvCnYgYA/видео.html
jonathan leslie exactly what I was thinking, I just didn’t know if anyone would appreciate the reference
I immediately wanted the screw driver set you showed. do you mind sharing where you got it?
"This is the LockPickingLawyer"
The Lock : *Intense Sweating*
"3 is binding..."
The Lock: "I'M A FINGERPRINT LOCK! STOP!"
@@texaswilliam OMG William sexualizing a padlock is filthy and degenerate. Keep the good job.
The circuit board probably has a common ground-plane so you only need to bridge the positive.
Sooo uhhh... when you gonna do a video on lock picking a bank safe? Asking for a friend
video 1001 is the closest to what you're looking for
Hey man all i wanna know is where i can get that screwdriver set.
Im combing comments for the same reason lol
chinese "wiha" screwdriver kit. i have a one and he is pretty good.
Where do I get that screwdriver set from?
I was wondering that too, they look nice.
@@joseantoniolago5857 I've got the same set, I got mine about a year or so ago from Gearbest, but you might find them in the likes of Banggood as well.
www.gearbest.com/screwdriver---screwdriver-set/pp_3003381444963741.html?wid=2000001
@@joseantoniolago5857 www.amazon.com.au/Mi-x-Wiha-Precision-Screwdriver/dp/B07DCYW42R/ref=asc_df_B07DCYW42R/?tag=googleshopdsk-22&linkCode=df0&hvadid=341791682102&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=11381636952737888065&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=1000567&hvtargid=pla-719680180992&psc=1
That should be the xiaomi mijia Wiha screwdriver set. Very well made and affordable
www.gearbest.com/screwdriver---screwdriver-set/pp_3003381444963741.html?wid=2000001
Prying plastic with a flat head screwdriver and using a desktop power supply?
This is my kind of lock to pick.
What kind of screwdriver set is that? Great video!
www.gearbest.com/screwdriver---screwdriver-set/pp_3003381444963741.html?wid=2000001
Appreciate it!
If this lock were to sit out in the Texas summer heat, the adhesive on the front panel would almost certainly melt enough for you to be able to pry it off without any tools or cause any damage. After that, it’s your choice as to how you want to bypass the locking mech.
What an awful lock. But I wasn’t expecting much from a company called “OkLok.” They even acknowledged in their own name that their locks are only “ok.”
Pretty nice to see how you come up with those exploits.
BTW, you can probably use a single bridge "wire", since it's likely the motor and battery ground are already connected.
Given that the motor probably needs to turn one direction to unlock and the other way to re-lock, most likely that's not the case.
@@EnricoConca yep driven by an H bridge.
@@EnricoConca Oh, yeah, hadn't thought of that. I thought it was a single acting configuration.
LPL: "I'll be using a lock I have never seen or picked."
Me: "Oh... so only 8 minutes for the video length, it will probably take him around 6-7 minutes to find a fault and open it. Damn, that's quick, let's watch!"
LPL: *Casually opens the lock in literally 2 minutes from the moment he lays hands on it*
What the cinnamon toast is this? I would never dare to start my own company of security locks. Or... might do and call it "FU LPL", with the company motto: "That's all we can protect for you today."
... Great now I have to charge my locks now. 😂
I can tell it will be trash just by the included extremly budget 5 cent USB charging cable that ships with $1 powerbanks...
Can you also do a teardown of a Corona virus.
Goes from nothing to finished....
Still can't make a 10 minute video 😁😄
Could you post a link to your screwdriver set please. Love the videos, much love from Ireland
This is a super high tech lock! Unpickable!
What's that?
Uhhhhh... a screw...
DUDE? Ever hear of a Rivet?
2:49 Green Quality Control sticker
If the LPL was their QC inspector, none of their locks would ever leave the factory.
😏
That depends. It does what the specification says, probably. It is built according to specification. It does not break any law-defined standard (like small parts for children toys, hazardous external paint that melts your skin, etc), probably. It might even pass some security test, it you specify that it falls into category "cannot be opened under 30seconds without steel-cutting something". Maybe.
So maybe it's even better than some mechanical Masterlocks, that can be raked within 5s :D
but yeah, the exposed screws are pretty much a security flaw, they could make the screws accessible only when the lock is open or something
panda4247
If the paint melted off your skin it would make it much harder to open.
A QC failed sticker, in the Navajo language, would be a quick fix.
I was finally able to finnish my popcorn during one of your videos, usually it takes like 30 seconds to get it open :)
They didn't say it was great, just OK.
I am trying to decide between using this and my Abloy Oy PL-350. heheuheu
Am I the only one that would love to know about that screw driver set?
www.gearbest.com/screwdriver---screwdriver-set/pp_3003381444963741.html?wid=2000001
@@guyb7995 You deserve a reward of some kind!
If you disconnect the battery, does it lose its memory of the stored fingerprints? If so, that would be a practical exploit.
for non destructive intrusion, was the top of the lock susceptible to having a shim wedged in like the cheap combination locks? i can't tell just from looking at the shackle.
Swim above said, no because it's motor actuated posed to the pawl.
Given that it was a spring loaded detent, it probably is also shimmable, but that's boring. :)
Lock maker: spends months, maybe even years deisgning a lock
LPL in less than 3 minutes: "Oh look, I can just remove the screws"
No one:
Subtitles:
Hello, this is the wok picking laywer
"...and today we're going shopping for a new carbon steel wok. I know just the place..."
I want a screwdriver like yours 😢🔥💖💖💖🤩🤩🤩🤩
After watching several dozen of your excellent videos, I conclude that most locks are designed to keep out all but the .05% of people (or less) that can crack them, and that’s good enough. The design reaches a point of diminishing returns, where to keep out an ever tinier fraction of elite lock pickers adds enormously to the cost, weight, and probably the complexity of the lock in ways that will never pay for itself in a business model. You have a jaded point of view, since your hard-earned expertise makes you see many of these cheaper locks as “junk” where for the average person they are as sturdy as Fort Knox. I grant that it might be otherwise: that relatively inexpensive and simple changes would make these locks much more pick resistant. If that is the case, then manufacturers have no excuse.
I'm surprised you didn't check for a magnet exploit first.
1:57
LPL: a little bit of Damage
Guy from Flex Tape: THAT'S A LOT OF DAMAGE
If it has a Battery Mostlikely one wire has power the Board then Controlls flow u can simply short together the wires if they are aside one another Or short others toghether and u will mostlikely reach what u try to reach it will prob not be the Best for the Assebly Health but if ur Breaking in thats no concern.
"Hello, this is the wok picking lawyer"
- the auto-subtitles XD
You could just do this with a screw driver by opening the front and bottom and riping the battery out strip the wires and using the + and - to turn on the moter
"Oklok" in Swedish mean "ill-advised" or "unwise".
"8 minute video, this must be a good lock!"
...
"Oh, nevermind."
Nice change of format, though!
LPL: decides to make a longer video to show that picking actually consumes more time than "a couple of minutes"
LPL: still opens the pick up in 4 mins
He needs one of those cell-phone disassembly toolkits. A "spudger" I think it's called.