Good job! I have a copy of the first page of the original 'second cadenza' so I can provide a few more details. Downbeats in measures 3, 5, and 7 have accents while the pick up to measure 4 and all four quarter notes in that measure have dashes. The second half of measure 26 indicates 'poco a poco piu forte.' Measures 44 and 45 in your transcription are actually triples in the original, all within one measure. Note values in measures 46 through 49 in your transcription are actually 16th notes in the original, occupying a total of four measures. It's amazing how much importance the 'second cadenza' places upon the usage of triplet against duplet, a pattern repeated throughout the entire concerto!
Thank you. The Sibelius family has the copyright until 2028, and have allegedly restricted who can play the original because Sibelius did not want it butchered again, so he simplified it. I have to stay alive until then to hear Kavakos play it again.
Interesting original cadenza, feels very Bach like. I do think the revised version played today makes more sense form-wise, but the cadenza here could be a nice foundation for another piece, perhaps a violin sonata.
Kavakos is a trustee to the Sibelius family. He is humble and dedicated and extremely skilled. I am not sure if he helps them decide who gets to play the original, there have been two good and one more labored renditions published to RUclips.
@@jazzyjohnson2925 Well, that explains it. Good for him. One hopes that soon this whole copyright scam will come to an end, and the family, however honorable, will no longer have any say in deciding what musicians can or cannot play. They never had any moral right to do so in the first place. I ain't copyright lawyer, but, assuming the "life plus 70" principle applies here, this racket will end in 2027, and after that we will be able to send any people who claim to decide what we can and cannot play STRAIGHT TO HELL.
For bars 44-47, wouldn't it be more normal to have a harmonic (diamond-shaped half note) for the third and sixth notes instead of the 15ma? Just wondering.
man,who actually composed this cadenza? it's so much beautiful,i almost cried listening it,easily one of the most artistical things I've heard
Sibelius
It was in the version of sibelius before revision, so he composed it himself. Read about history of this concerto if you haven't yet
Sibelius himself. But aparently the original concerto was too hard and he had to re-write it xD
@@remember9097 I assure you he did not rewrite it because it was "too hard."
Good job! I have a copy of the first page of the original 'second cadenza' so I can provide a few more details. Downbeats in measures 3, 5, and 7 have accents while the pick up to measure 4 and all four quarter notes in that measure have dashes. The second half of measure 26 indicates 'poco a poco piu forte.' Measures 44 and 45 in your transcription are actually triples in the original, all within one measure. Note values in measures 46 through 49 in your transcription are actually 16th notes in the original, occupying a total of four measures. It's amazing how much importance the 'second cadenza' places upon the usage of triplet against duplet, a pattern repeated throughout the entire concerto!
where did you got it?
Thank you. The Sibelius family has the copyright until 2028, and have allegedly restricted who can play the original because Sibelius did not want it butchered again, so he simplified it. I have to stay alive until then to hear Kavakos play it again.
OMG i've been waiting and looking for the re-upload or an alike video for one entire year. Really really appreciate this, thank you!
Thank you so much for your work.
Interesting original cadenza, feels very Bach like. I do think the revised version played today makes more sense form-wise, but the cadenza here could be a nice foundation for another piece, perhaps a violin sonata.
Thank you bro!!!
Has anyone ever considered reaching out to Kavakos about the score? Just saying.
OMG the video is back
This is such a pulchritudinous and poetic cadenza, it's a pity that it didn't make it to the final version!
Sinceramente eu não tinha ouvido esse trecho no concerto de violinos de sibelius .
How did you get the video of this performance? Please post the whole thing??
wait how did kavakos get the score in the first place?
Most likely he worked with the Sibelius estate and got an official permission. You know, the copyright ripoff.
Kavakos is a trustee to the Sibelius family. He is humble and dedicated and extremely skilled. I am not sure if he helps them decide who gets to play the original, there have been two good and one more labored renditions published to RUclips.
@@jazzyjohnson2925 Well, that explains it. Good for him. One hopes that soon this whole copyright scam will come to an end, and the family, however honorable, will no longer have any say in deciding what musicians can or cannot play. They never had any moral right to do so in the first place. I ain't copyright lawyer, but, assuming the "life plus 70" principle applies here, this racket will end in 2027, and after that we will be able to send any people who claim to decide what we can and cannot play STRAIGHT TO HELL.
For bars 44-47, wouldn't it be more normal to have a harmonic (diamond-shaped half note) for the third and sixth notes instead of the 15ma? Just wondering.
You are right, thanks!
This was the first rough draft so some changes need to be made!
***** No problem! Great work on the transcription :)