DJI Osmo Pocket 3 VS Sony ZV E10 (LOW LIGHT)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2023
- Let's see the LOW LIGHT performance of the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 VS the Sony ZV-E10 in the downtown area of Pismo Beach, CA. Enjoy.
Purchasing a product through our Amazon Associate link helps the channel!
💠DJI OSMO POCKET 3: amzn.to/3MHqgxc
💠DJI OSMO POCKET 3 (CREATOR COMBO): amzn.to/40HV5HZ
💠FIFINE SC1 AUDIO INTERFACE: amzn.to/40zxuZP
💠FIFINE K688 MICROPHONE: amzn.to/3sFapbo
💠FIFINE BM88 BOOM ARM: amzn.to/45E12Hw
💠SONY ZV-E10: amzn.to/46gbxkl
💠Sony 16-50mm KIT LENS: amzn.to/3RrZMTz
Technology for content creators!
@CreatorsTEK / RUclips / FACEBOOK / TWITTER / 
Наука
![J.P., NLE Choppa - Bad Bitty (Remix) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rBDa6BCvw10/mqdefault.jpg)
People are commenting that you should use a gimbal and a better lens, but I think the merit of this video is showing what you get when you just buy the product. No extra accessories to change the out of the box experience. I do think with accessories you can get a better shot with the Sony, but out of the box the pocket 3 just offers an incredible amount of value. For the base versions of both the pocket is the cheaper option. Even with the full accessory kit, once you buy a gimbal and new lens for the Sony you are hundreds of dollars in deeper than a pocket 3.
It's as if you can read my mind! I really appreciate the comment. I will try to do a better job of communicating my reasoning behind things such as this one for future videos. I wish I could give your comment more 'Likes'! Thank you and Cheers!
@@CreatorsTEKhey! just wanted to say I totally appreciated this video and concur with @jy608042 said, I think this is actually a fair comparison given it's both out of the box options - keep doing what you're doing!!
I can whole heartedly say that I greatly appreciate kind words like yours. They mean a lot to me and thank you. I how I can continue making more content that helps fellow content creators and to spread good vibes.
ruclips.net/video/VwxUSKqp_nc/видео.html
Yeah you could get 2-3 pocket 3’s for the price of a zve10 + sigma 16 f1.4 + a cheap gimbal
I have the zve10. It has the potential to do alright in lowlight, but everyone is forgetting the biggest difference: you have to buy an external gimbal. That adds weight, cost, and bulk to your setup. It’s no longer a pocket camera. Not to mention, the 10 bit codec in the DJI will handle lowlight better in terms of chroma noise.
Out of box, you need to use catalyst browse to stabilize your zve10, and that means your shutter needs to be minimum 1/200 which loses you even more light.
After iso 2000 on the zve10, it’s barely usable footage. Honestly I think this test was more than fair because if he had tested the ZV-1 which is a more fair comparison… it wouldn’t even be close, the pocket 3 would destroy it.
Yes a $2000 setup with the zve10/sigma 16mm 1.4/cheap zhiyun gimbal would be better than the pocket 3, but at that point just buy the a6700 or fx30….
The pocket 3 comes as is and looks this good. That’s insane
Well said. Thank you.
Thanks yours reviews. I pick up DJI Pocket 3 !!
Very helpful and informative, I would also like to see Photography test because in upcoming days I am thinking about the purchase of pocket 3
I wish I had more time with the Pocket 3 to continue doing more tests with it, however my time with it ran out. Perhaps eventually I'll get a few extra rounds with it so that I can conduct photography tests with it as well, but in the meantime I would like you to know that with my short time with it, the Sony ZV-E10 outperforms the DJI Pocket 3 when it comes to photography. Both images look nice, however you have much more control with taking the image you want on the Sony vs taking the image the camera gives you on the DJI.
I appreciate your input and hope I can bring more content to you in the future. Cheers!
Thanks so much for doing this video with KIT LENS ONLY THATS JUSTIFIES THE PROPER PRICE COMPARISON TO DJI POCKET 3 ❤ UNLIKE USING EXPENSIVE LENS N GIMBAL WHICH ADDS WAY TOO MUCH COST FOR A BUDGET CAMERA BUYERS LIKE ME 😢😅
And also do this video test. CAN pocket 3 used as a studio camera or indoor camera and compare the same with sony zv e10 kit lens. That would be grt.
Greetings. You might want to look at my Pocket 3 review video, I cut between zve10 and pocket 3 footage for comparison. I hope this helps. Thank you for watching.
Nice simple comparison.
I hope it served to help you, I appreciate the feedback.
Share the settings u have used on ur pocket 3 and does low light mode have any log profile for color grading 🤔
Could you do a similar low light comparison with op3 vs zv1 as both 1” sensor, I’ll be interested to found out the difference.
Doing citywalk for about 2 hours with Zve10+30mm sigma+ Feiyu scorp mini, god it's real workout 💪🏼💪🏼
should do another video comparison with a better lens , preferably a f1.8 lens
I agree with you. As I continue acquiring more lenses, I will look to do more comparisons with the different lens types. For the time being, this was the closest I had available to matching up with the Pocket 3. Thank you very much for your input and hope you found this video helpful.
dont break the bank by doing a youtube review, try renting lens instead@@CreatorsTEK
I love the zev10 but the kit sense isn’t the worse but it is by far from the best. The pocket 3 definitely offers a better out of box experience. But with something the the 15mm or 11mm f1.8 lens I think the Sony performs better as they are both wide angle lenses and very good. But for the prices of both the pocket t3 might be better for most.
You should do another video trying to fit the Sony, gimbal and “better” lens into your pockets;-)
But seriously, for the designed purpose, the OP3 is clearly superior. It’s so far ahead of the Sony that it becomes a bit comical to compare the two.
As both a Video Equipment and Technology enthusiast, this OP3 is truly something to behold. Ever since I got my hands on the OP1, I had a mental wish list for this camera and with the OP3, DJI finally delivered. This is truly a technological marvel that is accessible to most people. I think it's a matter of time before we see DJI come out with a dedicated camera that takes aim at the typical camera market.
I still prefer the normal mode of osmo pocket 3 compared t0 low light mode cause in low light mode the video quality is super baked and has a very high noise reduction and oversharpend and looks like an post effect.
I love the input. Thank you!
Kindly add a photograph sample in these videos too
Thank you for the input. I will try to implement that in future productions like this one.
THIS video is what anyone cross shopping the ZV-E10 vs Pocket 3 should watch! I own the ZV-E10 with the kit lens and while I do love it, it's just cumbersome enough that I don't take it everywhere with me and find myself grabbing my GoPro or just my phone when I'm running out the door in order to capture quick clips/pics of family or random moments. While the quality of my gopro/phone may not be as good as what I can get from the ZV-E10, the bad stabilization (unless you wanna deal with catalyst browse or gimbal) ends up making my ZV-E10 footage look like garbage in any real-life scenario with any movement whatsoever. Having said all that, I think the ZV-E10 paired with an 11mm 1.8 and gimbal beats out the Pocket 3 all day and twice on Sundays if you don't mind the hassle of a bigger rig if absolute quality in the end product is what you're after.
I love your assessment. The Pocket 3 is definitely more of a 'pick up and play' type of camera that yields great results. Whereas even though the ZV-E10 can be easy to use, you get the most out of the camera by using the manual settings, and boy what a great camera it is. Cheers!
zv-e10 is the winner if you are going to film on a tripod, but when you are looking for low-profile filming on the go, pocket 3 is the way to go
Well said. Thank you 🙏🏼
what is the DR on the pocket
I suppose it depends on what metric you use to measure Dynamic Range. Some people use color bit depth to get an idea about this. In this case the answer is that it's capable of 10 Bit D-Log M (Color Mode). I personally like to use the f-stop metric, in which case, I have seen no documentation explaining how many f-stops of dynamic range the Pocket 3 is capable of. I will say, to the naked eye, it has really good quality HDR. I wish I could have been more help to you, thank you for your question.
I say gimgal the Sony for a decent comparison.
None of this "price matching" fiasco. Compare them on similar technical features and let the price difference be the disadvantage.
The Sony ZV-E10 with zero stabilisation and a mini gimbal will be noticeably better than the Dji Pocket 3
I like your passion! I will attempt to do this comparison request as soon as I get my hands on a gimbal for the ZV-E10 (or another Pocket 3 for that matter). Thanks for watching!
You need a gimbal apart from a better lens.
I completely agree with you and am actually working towards getting both. I should have done a better job of explaining that the merits of this video were to show an 'out of the box' experience from both of these devices. This is part of the reason why I used this lens with the ZV-E10 and no gimbal. I appreciate your input and hope I can do more videos involving more equipment in future videos. Thank you.
a f3.5 for night recording is not good a lenses with 1.8 would be perfect
I agree, f3.5 is the lowest stop this lens is capable of getting. Additionally, I should have explained it in the video, the idea behind using this setup for the ZV-E10 was to show the capabilities of this product when you buy the kit as a whole (which falls closer to the price category as the Pocket 3. Thank you and I hope can bring future comparisons using different lenses as well. Cheers!
Sony should call DJI is Grandfather. Nightly and stabilization. 10đ
Thank you for watching!
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank you!
you should use
F2 (same aperture)
1/30 (same shutter)
10mm (exactly equal to 20mm after active stabilization cutting)
Stabilizer (OP3 also has a stabilizer)
In this comparison, zve10 will have better picture quality
I would like to be able to do that but unfortunately that’s out of the capabilities of the kit lens that is bundled with this camera. The purpose of this video is to show off the capabilities of each camera’s base setup as was set by its manufacturer.
For this reason I explain during the video that the ZV-E10 can achieve better results using other lenses. I hope to provide a more even comparison (using a better lens and gimbal) in a future video. Thank you. I appreciate your feedback.
🤔 I think a more fair comparison would to use the ZV with a gimbal instead of using digital stabilization. Get pocket 3 for convenience and ZV for everything else.
I appreciate your input, however I currently do not have a ZV to use for testing purposes. I had to make due with what I have. Thank you for your input and have a great day!
Pocket 3 deserves to be the king. Regarding vibration resistance and compactness. I don't think I need +120 for heavy gymbal products for a quality sony camera there isn't too much of a difference
In this comparison ZV-E10 looks like a crap... lower quality than 15year phone would shoot on 640x400. I do not understand why everything is OVERexposed by at least a stop at NIGHT! This is insane... But nevertheless Osmo impresses a lot...
Quite impressive indeed. Thanks for watching!
Dji is better than Sony
For this specific scenario, I don’t disagree. Thanks for watching.
Take this video with a grain of salt as this is not indicative of what the ZV can do in low light. Just google for low light videos to compare and you'll see.
I'm definitely on the side of get the pocket 3 but this video doesn't do the zv any justice. Not going to mention the whole lens thing because the kit lens is more than capable.
I'm wondering if you adjusted the auto iso to only go within a certain range. I believe the pocket 3 low light mode stays within 1600 iso tops while auto iso on the sony could be going up to 32,000 unless you adjust the auto iso limits. The iso on the sony looks like its topping out imo which isn't a fair comparison.
The digital stabilization could be better done.
Worst of all it looks as if the lens is smudged with how blurry it is. Either something is wrong with how you processed it or the lens was dirty.
I'm all for getting the pocket 3 as the better all in one package that is easy to bring around but this video is just trash.
The lens was cleaned before the shoot (no smudging). ISO was set to full automatic (as stated in the video).
I also mention that the digital stabilization altered the image quality. More than anything else, I suspect this is why the image doesn’t look as good as it should had it been shot on a gimbal (without digital stabilization.) But this would have defeated the purpose of the ‘out of the box’ experience.
I’m not trying to make it seem like one camera is better than the other, they each have specific purposes and philosophies behind their design. It just depends on what works best for you.
Thank you for your input. Cheers!
Digital stabilisation at night.