Will Special Counsel Jack Smith win at the Trump trial?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 235

  • @92NY
    @92NY  11 месяцев назад

    Watch the full program: ruclips.net/video/v5yOh6VNNEY/видео.html

  • @ke9988
    @ke9988 11 месяцев назад +56

    Absolutely NO HUNG JURY!

  • @seangelarden9543
    @seangelarden9543 11 месяцев назад +36

    Its ridiculous that the rules are so ambiguous that you are in more trouble if you rob a liquor store

    • @TheDavidfallon
      @TheDavidfallon 11 месяцев назад +1

      That's a class (and often a race) distinction. America is not in any way an equal society.

  • @leoragaster4592
    @leoragaster4592 11 месяцев назад +32

    We hope and pray!

  • @davidwhite8045
    @davidwhite8045 11 месяцев назад +123

    I have total faith in the Justice Department to end this nightmare, Trump is an incompetent Criminal and should go to jail.

    • @denize7139
      @denize7139 11 месяцев назад +16

      I hope you are right!😑😬

    • @mitchhills4747
      @mitchhills4747 11 месяцев назад +3

      On the contrary, he is a very good criminal!

    • @rakeshmalik5385
      @rakeshmalik5385 11 месяцев назад +1

      I've lost all faith in the "justice" department to do anything right other than persecute the powerless.

    • @Teeveepicksures
      @Teeveepicksures 11 месяцев назад

      I don't.

    • @alanking6240
      @alanking6240 11 месяцев назад

      For what?

  • @JanetTedford
    @JanetTedford 11 месяцев назад +44

    Jack Smith will win GOD bless and be with him

    • @Kenjiro5775
      @Kenjiro5775 11 месяцев назад

      There are no gods. Religion is part of the problem here.

  • @mitchhills4747
    @mitchhills4747 11 месяцев назад +16

    No brainer. Of course Jack Smith will win! But ultimately, its' the people of America that will win....

  • @anniejuan1817
    @anniejuan1817 11 месяцев назад +30

    Nicolle Wallace is one of my favorite news persons.

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 11 месяцев назад

      She'd be great with the National Inquirer!

    • @richard1472
      @richard1472 11 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@stickcheck3045
      Oh, you mean David Pecker and his catch and kill campaign?
      That National Enquirer?

    • @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394
      @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 11 месяцев назад

      Smoke show

    • @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394
      @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 11 месяцев назад

      @@stickcheck3045 Well, the National Enquirer is *the* media of choice for conspiracy mongers like maga...

    • @julesnagbunga1204
      @julesnagbunga1204 11 месяцев назад

      You obviously read garbage so what would you know?

  • @SmackWaterJack001
    @SmackWaterJack001 11 месяцев назад +107

    IF JACK SMITH WINS
    AMERICA WINS !!!!

    • @stevechance150
      @stevechance150 11 месяцев назад +1

      Sorry, that's not the simulation we're living in.

    • @SmackWaterJack001
      @SmackWaterJack001 11 месяцев назад +6

      @@stevechance150
      tell Nurse Ratched to up the dose, friend…

    • @rickkeeton9246
      @rickkeeton9246 11 месяцев назад

      @@SmackWaterJack001
      Still butt hurt about that 2020
      ass whooping
      hillbilly ?😂

    • @GetZappéd1974
      @GetZappéd1974 11 месяцев назад +5

      If Jack Smith lose, the world lose.

    • @SmackWaterJack001
      @SmackWaterJack001 11 месяцев назад

      @@GetZappéd1974
      I agree, 1000%.

  • @FamilyGuyChillin
    @FamilyGuyChillin 11 месяцев назад +27

    Trump and his clown lawyers still has no case and will lose.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 11 месяцев назад +3

      Lock the clown up.

    • @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394
      @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 11 месяцев назад

      He is guilty. The road to a life sentence is just a formality that could only be bushwhacked by a criminal loving juror.

  • @Michael-zq1lq
    @Michael-zq1lq 11 месяцев назад +17

    He better go to prison, or i think all hell will break lose if he don't

    • @billiey36
      @billiey36 11 месяцев назад +4

      All hell will break lose if he does, but I'm okay with that. It has to happen sooner or later. The cult has to be broken up.

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 11 месяцев назад

      You're absolutely right, all hell will break loose and it's not going to end with good results for the swamp! Dems and the complicit Rinos have been getting fat off taxpayer money and insider trading, not to mention international espionage and treason as in the case of the Bribe'ems!

    • @SBryt-h8g
      @SBryt-h8g 11 месяцев назад

      @@billiey36only way for us to recover if their leader is gone & why 🇷🇺🤡&Rapist makes all those appearances and still holds his hate NAZI rallies instead of going on the debate stage like a normal candidate. He has lot’s of enablers helping him keep up this charade. Scary.

  • @leafuller3153
    @leafuller3153 11 месяцев назад +38

    It just seems the judges & courts are so afraid to treat him like any other defendant !

    • @Jumbaride
      @Jumbaride 11 месяцев назад +3

      There are far too many examples to support your comment, Lea. It's very disturbing.

    • @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394
      @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 11 месяцев назад +2

      You are right. Anybody else who behaved the way Tre45on has during this trial would have his bail revoked and be playing out the rest of the trial from behind bars.

    • @FrankChiappetta-p2b
      @FrankChiappetta-p2b 11 месяцев назад +1

      I totally agree

    • @julesnagbunga1204
      @julesnagbunga1204 11 месяцев назад

      That is because Trump is not like any other defendant! Judges are only too aware that Trump's supporters are crazy enough to harm citizens who they believe are enemies. That includes judges, attorneys, witnesses, and ordinary citizens. It's a double edge sword where if they incarcerate Trump his supporters will react violently, and if they let him violate the gag orders, his cult members will follow and support Trump's rhetorical rants!

  • @Seahorse0418
    @Seahorse0418 11 месяцев назад +4

    I love you so much Nicole. I watch you every day. And I named my son after Andrew Weismann. (Kidding, but I’m so glad my son has the same name as someone so amazing and smart that I also make appointment TV). Love y’all.

  • @a.w.thompson4001
    @a.w.thompson4001 11 месяцев назад +4

    Thanks!

  • @arteliadraper7287
    @arteliadraper7287 11 месяцев назад +5

    Yes 👍 I agree 😅

  • @annsmith7207
    @annsmith7207 11 месяцев назад +23

    It is up to the attorneys for the Justice Department that they selected jurors in voir dire that they can hear testimony in an objective manner and did not select a juror who is out to "make a name" for him- herself or to gain notoriety with 15 minutes of fame leading to a hung jury. Not an easy task.

  • @katherineweber8955
    @katherineweber8955 11 месяцев назад +6

    That's interesting. Let's hope it goes smoothly.

  • @freedomofreligion3248
    @freedomofreligion3248 11 месяцев назад +13

    The evidence is overwhelming.

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 11 месяцев назад

      What evidence? Evidence of what? Accusations are and have always been just that.....ACCUSATIONS!!! In America, are people guilty before or after they are proven guilty in a court of law or are they innocent until proven guilty....yes or no???

    • @terri6854
      @terri6854 11 месяцев назад +1

      @stickcheck3045
      Try and keep up with the rest of the class, stickcheck. Don't just hide down the back of the room reading right-wing news comics.

    • @terri6854
      @terri6854 11 месяцев назад +1

      @stickcheck3045
      And as for your ignorant, virtue-signalling question about "are they innocent until proven guilty", why do you think the country is having all these trials in the first place? IN ORDER TO PROVE IT IN A COURT OF LAW, goober.

    • @julesnagbunga1204
      @julesnagbunga1204 11 месяцев назад

      You are a goose. It is impossible to bring an indictment without evidence!

    • @dragonage2112
      @dragonage2112 11 месяцев назад

      There is no evidence in order for there to be evidence a crime has to be committed losers!

  • @soniavalencia1900
    @soniavalencia1900 11 месяцев назад +5

    Jack Smith! ⚖️🙌🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👊🏼🇺🇸💯🎯

  • @randysmith2866
    @randysmith2866 11 месяцев назад +38

    Just one Trumper on any jury and Trump goes free. It's a failing in our judicial system.. Trump will win every case thrown at him. The only place to beat him will be at the polls! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!

    • @KMc-cw3qt
      @KMc-cw3qt 11 месяцев назад +7

      the E. Jean Carrol case happened tho. There is always hope.

    • @JeffKlavir
      @JeffKlavir 11 месяцев назад +2

      This thought bothers me too.

    • @SlickWilly79
      @SlickWilly79 11 месяцев назад +1

      Sorry, democrat = disaster. Just look around

    • @branjosnow6244
      @branjosnow6244 11 месяцев назад +7

      ​@@SlickWilly79 🤣 You've got, nuthin!

    • @ltdc426
      @ltdc426 11 месяцев назад

      @@KMc-cw3qt the “me too”extortion trial was a civil trial with a VERY low threshold of responsibility. This one will require evidence of criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt, much higher. But relax Dems, if you can fake an election you can fake a conviction.

  • @diegooland1261
    @diegooland1261 11 месяцев назад +25

    What was left out is Jack Smith's record before the supreme court. If the jury does decide, this is going to land on the supreme court's desk. They have a funny way of seeing things, and Smith well knows this.

    • @SmackWaterJack001
      @SmackWaterJack001 11 месяцев назад

      the supreme court has already stated that they’re not interested in Trumps cases…

    • @DJKevvyKevCoolBreeze
      @DJKevvyKevCoolBreeze 11 месяцев назад

      If the Supreme Court ever got ahold of this (doubtful), it would take a LONG time. Potentially years; it would have to be appealed multiple times up the chain first. By then, Trump will have been convicted multiple times, of multiple crimes, in multiple jurisdictions. There is No Question: he WILL be held accountable. It's just a matter of When.

    • @billiey36
      @billiey36 11 месяцев назад +4

      Where did people get the idea that Smith has some kind of "record" before the SC? All he has is one case he was involved in, but not even the lead prosecutor for, that ended up before the SC. I haven't heard of any other in an over 30 year career.

    • @SmackWaterJack001
      @SmackWaterJack001 11 месяцев назад

      @@billiey36
      Smith became the vice president and head of litigation for Hospital Corporation of America in 2017. On May 7, 2018, Smith was named to a four-year term as chief prosecutor for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers in The Hague, investigating war crimes in the Kosovo War, including the case of Salih Mustafa.
      Smith began his prosecutorial career in 1994 as an assistant district attorney with the New York County District Attorney’s Office. In 1999, he became an assistant U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, where he worked for nine years prosecuting issues such as gang murders of police officers as well as civil rights violations, according to a bio from the Justice Department.
      From 2008 to 2010, Smith worked at the International Criminal Court where he oversaw war crimes investigations.
      In 2010, Smith returned to the Justice Department where he worked as chief of the Public Integrity Section, overseeing public corruption and elections-related investigations. In 2015, he served as the first assistant U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee before becoming the acting United States attorney.
      Attorney General Merrick Garland said when he named Smith as special counsel in November, that Smith would be returning to the U.S. from his position at The Hague and would begin his role as special counsel immediately.

    • @hans5443
      @hans5443 11 месяцев назад +4

      @@billiey36guess you never seen or heard of him prosecuting former heads of state at the international criminal court in The Hague have you. He has never lost a case.

  • @jimmyanderson1011
    @jimmyanderson1011 11 месяцев назад +2

    Flat out YES

  • @Darbobski
    @Darbobski 11 месяцев назад +17

    Jack Smith has never had this much evidence to work with. The difficult part will be how to work through what is needed in a timely fashion. In the end, there will be no question regarding Trump's guilt. The lingering question for most people will be why the justice system is so swift for most people and so slow for the rich and powerful.

    • @Heathe378
      @Heathe378 11 месяцев назад

      People with money can afford a lawyer that’s why

    • @Darbobski
      @Darbobski 11 месяцев назад

      @Heathe378 People affording a lawyer has nothing to do with it. It's about how high profile the accused is. This is about as high profile as it gets.

    • @Heathe378
      @Heathe378 11 месяцев назад

      @@Darbobski the people who know the law have the money for the lawyers think about it

    • @Darbobski
      @Darbobski 11 месяцев назад

      @@Heathe378 Look at Trump's lawyers at this point. They are not the best of the best. The best ones will no longer work for him. Even Ty Cobb has turned away.

    • @julesnagbunga1204
      @julesnagbunga1204 11 месяцев назад

      Smith deliberately made the indictment limited in the number of charges in order for the trial to conclude swiftly.

  • @mbg3871
    @mbg3871 11 месяцев назад +3

    The scary part is your saying, “in any reasonable world”. Have we been IN a reasonable world. ! ? The fact that he was even Pres ONCE but is running again, still has “followers’…has all been mind boggling

  • @lizandravigo8030
    @lizandravigo8030 11 месяцев назад +1

    Love, love this notes from Nicolle and Andrew w, ❤❤❤❤❤👍🌈🌈🌈 than you….so much😅😅😅

  • @michaelmackey754
    @michaelmackey754 11 месяцев назад +2

    Great video

  • @diligentmindz
    @diligentmindz 11 месяцев назад +7

    “In any rational world”, let’s hope that is the world we live in.

  • @naomiweaver1855
    @naomiweaver1855 11 месяцев назад +14

    I don’t see how we can have the history of the country turned by one person. It is absolutely nauseating.

    • @danielsmith699
      @danielsmith699 11 месяцев назад

      You said that right on. No way we can let 1 dufess tear down our institutions and rewrite our constitution to the way he sees fit with no other opinions from anyone else in other words he wants to be a wanna be dictator just like Putin and uhn!

  • @SmackWaterJack001
    @SmackWaterJack001 11 месяцев назад +11

    REAL AMERICANS
    will be dancing in the street once the orange menace has been sent away…

  • @ferfer5885
    @ferfer5885 11 месяцев назад +15

    Why doesn’t anyone ask Trump.. “ if you think the elections are rigged… why are you running??”
    Everyone should know that if he loses, he won’t accept the results

    • @earnesttbass8107
      @earnesttbass8107 11 месяцев назад +1

      Speak for yourself furfur

    • @julesnagbunga1204
      @julesnagbunga1204 11 месяцев назад +1

      At last...some common sense. Why would Trump be running for office if he says the system is corrupt?

    • @julesnagbunga1204
      @julesnagbunga1204 11 месяцев назад +1

      He/she is not speaking for him/herself. It was a question, not a personal opinion!

    • @Martytroutman
      @Martytroutman 11 месяцев назад

      That's funny! You don't know the elections are rigged? How naive you are! I guess only smart people pay attention.

    • @Martytroutman
      @Martytroutman 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@julesnagbunga1204stop making yourself look stupid with the he/she bullshit. Only ignorant people fall for that nonsense. Grow up!

  • @The_Nightwatch
    @The_Nightwatch 11 месяцев назад +2

    I believe Jack can win the D.C. case. He doesn't stand a chance in hell in Florida as long as Cannon is the judge.

  • @ritagorra9191
    @ritagorra9191 11 месяцев назад +2

    On the other hand I didn’t think it possible that he would ever get elected.

  • @Perfer-gw6ir
    @Perfer-gw6ir 11 месяцев назад +5

    Quit trying to sow division on this very key issue. Of course, he will win. Our nation will not survive if Trump is elected President.

  • @fireflymary9269
    @fireflymary9269 11 месяцев назад +1

    Jurors better not hang this up

  • @tybrady4598
    @tybrady4598 11 месяцев назад +4

    One person could easily sneak on. If MAGAts are 20% of the voters, there could be at least two Trump lovers on the jury. Scary.

  • @jerrys9226
    @jerrys9226 11 месяцев назад +1

    I hope they screen out the red hats.

  • @artofmusic303
    @artofmusic303 11 месяцев назад +11

    If he is not convicted, this will just empower him more with his cultists. He will be more difficult to contain and even more dangerous.

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 11 месяцев назад

      Now let's see....what empowerment will Trump have with his cultists if he is not convicted and he is elected back into office? Oh yeah....lower inflation, energy self-sufficiency, home ownership affordability, possible peace agreements in the Ukraine and the Middle East, the end to sensorship, the proper regulation of the Mainstream Media by ending FBI, DOJ and Dem influence, no more illegal immigrants crossing our borders, the end of Fentanyl trafficking, ......oh, and let's not forget that he'll reveal the graft and corruption in Washington on both sides of the aisle, Dems and RINOs, and drain the swamp! After all, his threat to do so in 2016 is what started all this mess to begin with! Yup, he's dangerous all right, but only to the swamp who have gotten fat off taxpayers' money and continue to do so!

    • @rickkeeton9246
      @rickkeeton9246 11 месяцев назад

      How will he be difficult to contain when his fat ass is sitting in jail?

    • @dragonage2112
      @dragonage2112 11 месяцев назад

      You better hide then wiener!

  • @transputin
    @transputin 11 месяцев назад +16

    The more interesting question is, will Trump ever be locked up?

    • @moonmunster
      @moonmunster 11 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah, they will find him guilty, but he will only get 2 weeks probation, already served. Just like the judge in Colorado - he's guilty but the 14th amendment doesn't apply to the pres.

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 11 месяцев назад

      @@moonmunster Since Trump has not been convicted in any court of insurrection, the accusation made against him by the judge was an accusation and her opinion only. He is innocent of insurrection because he has not been proven guilty of insurrection in a court of law...PERIOD!

  • @daveyr7454
    @daveyr7454 11 месяцев назад +24

    Why not consider picking your twelve jurors from the U.K, or France, or another European country. I wonder what THAT jury would decide!

    • @markdennis8932
      @markdennis8932 11 месяцев назад +14

      GUILTY from UK

    • @michelez715
      @michelez715 11 месяцев назад +14

      From France: GUILTY.

    • @cathynewyork7918
      @cathynewyork7918 11 месяцев назад +3

      This is an American trial of an American defendant. It must have American jurors.

    • @romulus_
      @romulus_ 11 месяцев назад +14

      they'd come to the conclusion that he's guilty before lunch the first day.

    • @cathynewyork7918
      @cathynewyork7918 11 месяцев назад +14

      @@romulus_ It is very clear from the evidence and all trump's speeches that he is guilty. No question. I hope he goes to prison for life.

  • @Michael-zq1lq
    @Michael-zq1lq 11 месяцев назад +2

    That one better run and hide if he's for a low life cop killer

  • @megancunningham9471
    @megancunningham9471 11 месяцев назад +1

    I really wish you guys didn't talk publicly about how one juror could ruin the whole thing... please stop giving them ideas.

  • @davidpride8199
    @davidpride8199 11 месяцев назад +1

    Vote Jack Smith for DOJ, in 2024. Merrick Garland is a great guy. But he's not what America needs, going forward. One word. Temperment. Similar to Joe Biden, Garlands time has come, and gone. And sorry Joe, but government must function like sports teams, of today. Joe Namath was a great QB in his time. But he'd never survive the riggers, of a 2023, NFL offense. We got Jack Smith a second time around, in free agency. He's smart, efficient, and highly respected, world wide. So start him to lead our first team DOJ offense, in 2024.

  • @karenclayton7687
    @karenclayton7687 11 месяцев назад +8

    Trump has people out there who will do his bidding.

    • @marciafierro4931
      @marciafierro4931 11 месяцев назад

      Basically, Trump brought this on HIMSELF! Then he uses emotional blackmail on the American people to get sympathy, and do his DIRTY WORK for him 👈

  • @deborahboggs6040
    @deborahboggs6040 11 месяцев назад +13

    no faith whatsoever in the justice systems and im sure im not alone!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @scoobysnacks8544
      @scoobysnacks8544 11 месяцев назад +1

      If anyone thinks justice will triumph in this, I have a very nice bridge hardly used for sale. 🤦‍♂️ I get the feeling the justice department waited too long to bring charges, knowing that the former president won’t be convicted. They basically wanted to satisfy both tribes, bring charges for one tribe, and then have an acquittal to satisfy the other tribe. In the end nothing will happen.

    • @hildepostler3868
      @hildepostler3868 11 месяцев назад

      I agree with you 👍 💯

    • @billiey36
      @billiey36 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@scoobysnacks8544 What bull. Garland may have waited too long, but there's no way Smith is wasting his time just to let tRump go free.

    • @tw3235
      @tw3235 11 месяцев назад

      Complete agreement@@billiey36

    • @scoobysnacks8544
      @scoobysnacks8544 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@billiey36 I never said Smith is wasting his time. Smith works for the DOJ and that’s his job, after all we pay for his services through our taxes. Any attorney will tell you, there is no certainty in court. That’s why most cases are settled out of court or plea deals are accepted. It’s one thing to present a case to a jury, trying to convince all 12 is a challenge, as it should be. I can appreciate your faith in our judicial system, but I am speaking from experience. The fact that anyone can run while under indictment is the problem.

  • @WiremuMcGregor-x3b
    @WiremuMcGregor-x3b 11 месяцев назад

    No!!!!!!! Will Justice win

  • @boredgrass
    @boredgrass 11 месяцев назад

    A functioning democracy wouldn't have to depend on one juror.

  • @fireflymary9269
    @fireflymary9269 11 месяцев назад +1

    If Jack smith wins he’s still possibly president regardless

  • @timkasten343
    @timkasten343 11 месяцев назад +1

    🇺🇸TRUMP4PRISON2024🇺🇸

  • @hammill444
    @hammill444 11 месяцев назад +1

    Will Jack Smith win the trial? First, let’s see if he can even get a trial DATE before Trump gets re elected.

  • @ptech88
    @ptech88 11 месяцев назад +9

    Isn’t that what they said about the OJ trial?

    • @cathynewyork7918
      @cathynewyork7918 11 месяцев назад +6

      Yes, it was. It is such a shame that justice was not done in the OJ trial.

    • @1004katherine
      @1004katherine 11 месяцев назад +6

      That's one of those things that will never leave my mind.

    • @cathynewyork7918
      @cathynewyork7918 11 месяцев назад +4

      @@1004katherine Me too.

  • @christinamangelo
    @christinamangelo 11 месяцев назад

    Nicolle has legs wow!

  • @RichardDoker-op6py
    @RichardDoker-op6py 11 месяцев назад

    So watch out for mob boss tampering with jury

  • @AlvaSudden
    @AlvaSudden 11 месяцев назад

    That wasn't reassuring. It was more like an instruction manual for a Trump traitor.

  • @jimako6
    @jimako6 11 месяцев назад

    Its all become beyond ridiculous defendant drumpf still roaming free

  • @kathrynhall7021
    @kathrynhall7021 11 месяцев назад +3

    I just noticed the sponsor of this video is DJT🤔
    I pray JS wins big🙏

  • @ltdc426
    @ltdc426 11 месяцев назад +5

    I would say ‘which’ trial? Because Trump should be asking for a separate jury trial for each individual indictment. If that’s allowed, it should be.

    • @waynegazard5038
      @waynegazard5038 11 месяцев назад +2

      What a wonderful idea lock him up as any normal citizen would be treated then let's see how many yrs each separate jury trials produces

    • @ltdc426
      @ltdc426 11 месяцев назад

      Just for sport, how cool would it be if he was convicted, jailed, removed from all ballots , and STILL won the write in vote? THAT would certainly tell you what America thinks of democrats. Would be fun to watch.

    • @stickcheck3045
      @stickcheck3045 11 месяцев назад

      @@waynegazard5038 The only trial that will count is the one that will acquit him once he gets done with the Dem clown show. However, before it gets to the SCOTUS, it's laughable to watch the Dems campaign for him by using political interference and making the voters want to vote for him because of it.

    • @waynegazard5038
      @waynegazard5038 11 месяцев назад

      @stickcheck3045 he wasn't acquitted on spending the money raised for children's cancer? He wasn't acquitted for sexual assault? He's already provided proof of fraud himself in NY,but it's still a free country the sheep can vote for a openly admitted fascist to stop all rights and freedoms

  • @stephennewton2777
    @stephennewton2777 11 месяцев назад +1

    Given many people’s odd desire for 15 minutes of fame, lack of ability to process factual information and need to be lied to, the chances of a hung jury are I think, very high.

  • @pjhimself252
    @pjhimself252 11 месяцев назад +1

    Curious to me that in these few minutes I heard nothing significant about the merits of the case.

  • @Wasntfunny
    @Wasntfunny 11 месяцев назад

    I’m pretty sure I saw this last week.

  • @georgecass8529
    @georgecass8529 11 месяцев назад

    He will lose this is all just a drama show .

  • @Heathbarbcrunch2
    @Heathbarbcrunch2 11 месяцев назад

    Weird unnecessary enormous microphone stand and mic. One condenser mic overhead would look and work nicer.

  • @carrot595
    @carrot595 11 месяцев назад +1

    if the "rule of law" is followed JS has a win.(as does America)...unfortunately money and with it power changes that rule.........JS ,therefore will lose. If I'm wrong I'll shout the celebratory beers!

  • @VonKirda
    @VonKirda 11 месяцев назад

    A hung jury is certain. And the law cannot handle it.

  • @bjv2323
    @bjv2323 11 месяцев назад +1

    Trump knows more about the law then judges do

  • @mariocordoba7160
    @mariocordoba7160 11 месяцев назад

    Unless the jury gets bough or threaten which is very likely

  • @earnesttbass8107
    @earnesttbass8107 11 месяцев назад

    Another panel of fake news dreamers😂

  • @kurtdobson
    @kurtdobson 11 месяцев назад

    So this guy can predict the outcome of the jury?

    • @thedont2154
      @thedont2154 11 месяцев назад

      Let's hope, but there's no controlling some MAGA nutjob from voting to acquit despite the obvious giant mountain of evidence.

    • @cathynewyork7918
      @cathynewyork7918 11 месяцев назад +10

      Mr. Weissman is a very experienced prosecutor - he is looking at all the evidence and is able to predict the outcome because the evidence is so complete and overwhelming.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 11 месяцев назад

      Well said.@@cathynewyork7918

    • @billiey36
      @billiey36 11 месяцев назад +1

      No, that's why he said it could end up being a hung jury. However, he's saying that the evidence should lead to a conviction if the jury is fair and impartial.

    • @cathynewyork7918
      @cathynewyork7918 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@billiey36 I hope it leads to a conviction.

  • @maxwolf2726
    @maxwolf2726 11 месяцев назад

    Sure he will time to put criminal defendant Trump in prison