What an excellent interview Mr Williams, you let Professor Cox say what he wanted to say and didn't interrupt him all the time or insult the intelligence of your listener as so many interviewers do. A good job well done.
brian cox is a truly remarkable person. it is interesting to see that scientists are very personable and some of the most humane people there are. they exude a level of kindness that I think is inherent in knowledge making the experience of being human most admirable. they display the nobility of simply being a person
Just an other example of how good this guys really is. I love listening to him and he's easy to understand. Way to go Brian and thank you for another video.
Watching this at work on nightshift, a colleague glanced at what I was watching and said " I see you're watching some Cox." Everyone's head popped over their desks like meerkats and I had a hard time trying to explain myself.
Brian's such a nice and interesting man I'd love to pick his brain. If I could ask him one question, anything at all, I think I'd ask him if he is constantly smirking or is that just his face
It just shows that he still has that child's excitement and curiosity for his work and science in general, and it's absolutely amazing! You can see his eyes shine as he talks about scientific topics, its just amazing how he genuinely is fascinated about these things. Hope people like him will exist in the future as well. We are in desperate need for people like him.
"There are a lot of descriptive books about quantum mechanics, so that's not what we set out to do. We set out to write a book that actually explained the theory as deeply as we could". Thank you, I am now interested in buying it.
Fantastic interview, great questions and answers that leave me totally inspired by science. Thanks to both of you for bringing lay people like me along with you on our mutual adventure of life moving into the future.
Making science accessible instead of sheltered to the academic few and encouraging others to build a bridge to understanding that science is necessary to society.
e is a concept Phi is visualization and we can switch gear using dimensions of 10 and higher or negative dimensions. And log determines time. And i is the variable parameters within each dimensions.
To me, the most unexpected, "weirdest" requirement of entanglement is that the state transition for all members of the entangled set must be simultaneous for all observers independent of relativistic reference frame. And, location-independent universal simultaneity is proven to be impossible in any spacetime consistent with Relativity. Non-simultaneity is a proven fact.
You didn't quite understand that video. the Higgs mechanism does explain the mass of quarks. its the mass of the gluons that accounts for most mass in an atom. gluons are massless particles in the sense that they don't interact with the Higgs field, but because of Einstein's energy/mass equivalence they do have mass, we do not need any additional mechanism to explain it. but all that has nothing to do with gravity Anyways. that's another problem entirely
Wait. So the Highs theory is a general theory in which all cases cannot coexist in nature? Which is why we have to carry out experiments to see which case applies to nature or if any case applies to nature at all. Interesting.
Surely only without mass can a particle appear simultaneously anywhere in the known universe, because with mass it can be quantified and given a value............so we are into the unknown area where dark energy is hypothesized......bring on the LHC!!!
Actually I wouldn't have bothered watching if it was ROBIN WIlliams the comedian. I only want to watch science interviews conducted by ROBYN Williams the experienced science presenter. Brush up on spelling and you may experience less disappointment in life...
"Disorder" doesn't that concept only have relevance to conscious entities? It's only consciousness that can appreciate an ordered structure, say a wall. As far as the universe is concerned there's just matter and space-time interacting with one another.
All things decay and eventually when the universe becomes cold because the last star has burnt all of it's fuel the black holes will also decay. This would be a complete disorder of all things and subatomic particles will be dispersed in an ever expanding vacuum of empty space.
See the problem is that currently the Higgs mechanism only accounts for why electrons and other leptons have mass. However, currently most of the mass of the universe (and you for that matter) comes from the energy in quarks. Even though we know where the mass comes from... we don't know why mass like other mass, aka why do they pull to one another. This video might explain a bit better (the mass bit not the attraction) : /watch?v=Ztc6QPNUqls I hope this helps a bit
Brian certainly has a mass appeal ( no Higgs joke there ) but I do wonder, with all the knowledge gained from LHC etc, how come we still cannot unify gravity into the standard model?, if this model does so well in predicting the macroscopic world eg the Chandraskar limit. Just makes me think that glossing over this indicates we dont have a complete picture of how nature works so I would temper the claims made thus far until we can achieve that consolidation
not quite true mass of some leptons such as electrons come from the higgs mechanism but most mass come from quarks. I am not an expert in this but maybe this video will help some: /watch?v=Ztc6QPNUqls
DO, no. BE, yes.With a nearly infinite amount of time and energy to be it in. Then you get to share this data with the entire universe as Hawking data. Isn't sharing important? Don't be stingy, colid your verb!
Like the song goes... Smiling faces sometimes pretend to be your friend Smiling faces show no traces of the evil that lurks within Smiling faces, smiling faces sometimes They don't tell the truth uh Smiling faces, smiling faces... Cox tells the truth!!
He's a great thinker, But its a shame that modern day science has limited itself, become a religion of its own. With priests, and FAITH. Yes faith. Just look into renormalization and all the ramifications of that error. Also, when they realized our universe was finely tuned to support life instead of realizing the awesomeness of that-they turned away from it and came up with the multiverse theory, and how there are an infinite number of universes, so its not surprising that ONE would be this way. Well does that sound like the simplest answer to you? It sounds like they discovered something amazing and became afraid that their entire view of reality would change
Dan Notz Actually the multiverse is just a theory, no one is claiming it to be fact. That will always remain the difference between religion and science ... that science will never say with 100% certainty that a theory is true until it's actually proven to be true. And btw if one universe is able to spring into existence one could think that whatever is outside the universe has this capability of "creating" a universe. So if it inevitably creates one universe because anything that can happen will happen, then why not create more? Maybe even an infinite number. It actually seems more unlikely to me that only one universe would come into existence .. i mean why just one ? or better yet how just one? It doesn't seem like a far fetched idea to me but then again it's not something we know ... it's just one possibility we entertain .. the truth is we don't know and any real scientist would tell you the same ... we don't know ... that's honesty.
Science is popular, Science that hasn't been dumbed down is popular. Yet ABC TV shows 1/2 an hour of science about 20 times a year that's been dumbed down to the point it's actually wrong. Aunty, the way is clear, a decent science program, at least a couple of hours of content a week that's produced at a level suited to the *interested* and *enthusiastic* layman.
He is a professor of particle physics at Manchester Uni, he works at CERN and helped find the Higgs Particle. He a great Physicist, but remember his major is Particle Physics not Quantum Physics.
:P Yeah...it is kind of feminine. But, what's wrong with that? Mick Jagger was massively feminine....but he got more girls in the 60s and 70s than you(assuming you're a guy) and I have in our entire lives times ten. Overly masculine men are pretty damn gross imo.
I often feel that way when watching scientists telling us "this is how it is". I'm forty eight and I can count a few times that I've heard or read that "scientists now know that the age of the universe is..." only to have that revised a few years later. All of that changed for me last year when I saw Brian Cox appear on the Colbert Report. Steven interviewed Brian in his usual zany style and asked him "what if you're wrong?" Brian's answer was "that would be great!"
Charles C Science changes its opinion when the facts show that it was wrong about something. That is reason to take science more seriously rather than less seriously. I think your disconnect comes from science journalism when they report on individual studies about medical research. Individual pieces of research are meaningless on their own. What matters is follow up research by independent groups (something editors don't want to cover because it's not "new(s)"), and more importantly, the consensus opinion of scientists from the relevant field. Science reporters should be reporting on changes in consensus opinion instead of individual pieces of research, because that's what's important. Thus you are told in one story that eating more of X is bad for you, then a few weeks later you read another story about another piece of research saying X is good for you. This is normal in science, but the reporters don't report on all the research on a given topic together, they just report on individual studies and present the results of those studies as fact when in fact each published paper is just a piece of a bigger puzzle.
JanjayTrollface I really like the guy and he's far from the best example of closed mindedness for sure. In truth, he's probably seen as a rebel amongst his peers. I just wish he'd take that extra step. Peace Bro
What an excellent interview Mr Williams, you let Professor Cox say what he wanted to say and didn't interrupt him all the time or insult the intelligence of your listener as so many interviewers do. A good job well done.
"Science is too important not to be a part of popular culture" - so so true. Love Brian Cox!
I love Brian's enthusiasm for his subject. I can listen to him discuss and describe physics any time.
brian cox is a truly remarkable person. it is interesting to see that scientists are very personable and some of the most humane people there are. they exude a level of kindness that I think is inherent in knowledge making the experience of being human most admirable. they display the nobility of simply being a person
Just an other example of how good this guys really is. I love listening to him and he's easy to understand. Way to go Brian and thank you for another video.
I think I could listen to Brian all day. Really interesting guy.
Science is indeed the foundation of our society, thanks to your efforts more people are coming to understand that.
Prof. Brian Cox is the man.
The last 2 minutes is so insightful everyone can learn from this.
Yeah we need more science on TV .As a physician I loved that "in biology there is always an exception" :)
That last part about not calling people idiots is clutch! Something I gotta work on.
Shit this is so interesting. Fascinating. I need to find a way to start learning more. It almost makes insomnia worthwhile.
+helenp7 IKR here for the same reason, Insomnia sucks but this is a great treatment,
even if i can't sleep after it i have learned something.
Watching this at work on nightshift, a colleague glanced at what I was watching and said " I see you're watching some Cox."
Everyone's head popped over their desks like meerkats and I had a hard time trying to explain myself.
I love to hear Brian speak. I would like to go to one of his shows one day!
I could listen to him talk all day.
Brian's such a nice and interesting man I'd love to pick his brain. If I could ask him one question, anything at all, I think I'd ask him if he is constantly smirking or is that just his face
+Peter Hay < That's what black holes do, they put a permanent smile on faces... :)
It just shows that he still has that child's excitement and curiosity for his work and science in general, and it's absolutely amazing! You can see his eyes shine as he talks about scientific topics, its just amazing how he genuinely is fascinated about these things. Hope people like him will exist in the future as well. We are in desperate need for people like him.
i would ask him how acurate is quantom physics
What a profoundly important and interesting man is Brian Cox.
Brian is the smiliest person I've ever seen :D I love it
"There are a lot of descriptive books about quantum mechanics, so that's not what we set out to do. We set out to write a book that actually explained the theory as deeply as we could".
Thank you, I am now interested in buying it.
Love you Brian.! Great interview.
I do love a good dose of sense and reason.
The professor with the perpetual smile
Do you put that down to a healthy diet, three orgasms per day - or, his high cheek-bones? I'll have what he's having.
This genius was in an AMAZING melodic rock band called dare. Look it up.
Band was called D-Ream
Stephen Ingle HE was in both dare and d-ream
Thank you!
If only I'd had teachers like Brian Cox,, but then perhaps it would have been a waste, for I was such a dill.
I love Brian Cox!
Brian is my hero
Fantastic interview, great questions and answers that leave me totally inspired by science. Thanks to both of you for bringing lay people like me along with you on our mutual adventure of life moving into the future.
It's all too much for my unscientific mind. I hold these people in the highest regard for their scientific knowledge.
Making science accessible instead of sheltered to the academic few and encouraging others to build a bridge to understanding that science is necessary to society.
e is a concept Phi is visualization and we can switch gear using dimensions of 10 and higher or negative dimensions. And log determines time. And i is the variable parameters within each dimensions.
I was still 100% convinced that was the back of Robbin Williams head, and then when I saw his face, for half a second it was still Robbin hahahaa
I believe everything Brian Cox tells me. he is way more than the rock star of psychics. love to be in his class.
I would truly love to know what Brian thinks about the Van Allan belts and space travel. does anyone know where I could contact him.
To me, the most unexpected, "weirdest" requirement of entanglement is that the state transition for all members of the entangled set must be simultaneous for all observers independent of relativistic reference frame. And, location-independent universal simultaneity is proven to be impossible in any spacetime consistent with Relativity. Non-simultaneity is a proven fact.
like his mind and I liked him in the band he was in.. back in the day
You got to love The Cox!
Excellent....
"some bits might be hard, and you might have to THINK"
OH THE HORROR
I was disappointed to find out that this was not Robbin Williams :( That name is false advertisement :P
Ah, the small difference between Robyn and Robin...it probably is false advertisement though...our fault.
Yeah but he's dead.
same here ;-(
go back to school. please.
ABC RN
There is no need to apologize. That's his fault.
he's such a hero
All this for eight cents a day ... ABC RN is fucking beautiful. Thanks.
his eyes are getting smaller and his cheekbones and lips are getting bigger and shinier
Hahaha
Very Informative, great interview, I hope our PM sees it too. :-)
You didn't quite understand that video. the Higgs mechanism does explain the mass of quarks. its the mass of the gluons that accounts for most mass in an atom. gluons are massless particles in the sense that they don't interact with the Higgs field, but because of Einstein's energy/mass equivalence they do have mass, we do not need any additional mechanism to explain it.
but all that has nothing to do with gravity Anyways. that's another problem entirely
Rutger Hauer interviews Brian Cox
Wait. So the Highs theory is a general theory in which all cases cannot coexist in nature? Which is why we have to carry out experiments to see which case applies to nature or if any case applies to nature at all. Interesting.
Surely only without mass can a particle appear simultaneously anywhere in the known universe, because with mass it can be quantified and given a value............so we are into the unknown area where dark energy is hypothesized......bring on the LHC!!!
he's a smart man.
눈이 살아있어요 부드러운 카리스마 매력 발산!!!
what a nice guy
the man is a genious i like him becouse he does not say everything is fact till proven
Was anyone else disappointed to find this wasn't Robyn Williams the actor/comedian? How good would that have been.
Actually I wouldn't have bothered watching if it was ROBIN WIlliams the comedian. I only want to watch science interviews conducted by ROBYN Williams the experienced science presenter. Brush up on spelling and you may experience less disappointment in life...
Susan DA finally someone who gets it, I'm his grandson btw
I'd always be smiling if I was that intelligent!
The title was very misleading and that host needs to change his name and also needs to stop interrupting such a brilliant individual.
Shit i thought it was Robin Williams. I was like "wait.."
"Disorder" doesn't that concept only have relevance to conscious entities? It's only consciousness that can appreciate an ordered structure, say a wall. As far as the universe is concerned there's just matter and space-time interacting with one another.
All things decay and eventually when the universe becomes cold because the last star has burnt all of it's fuel the black holes will also decay. This would be a complete disorder of all things and subatomic particles will be dispersed in an ever expanding vacuum of empty space.
Search Entropy
Anyone else feel like that host was interrupting Brian a bit?
See the problem is that currently the Higgs mechanism only accounts for why electrons and other leptons have mass. However, currently most of the mass of the universe (and you for that matter) comes from the energy in quarks. Even though we know where the mass comes from... we don't know why mass like other mass, aka why do they pull to one another. This video might explain a bit better (the mass bit not the attraction) : /watch?v=Ztc6QPNUqls I hope this helps a bit
doesnt his cheeks get tired of smiling. he never stops smiling!!!
Brian certainly has a mass appeal ( no Higgs joke there ) but I do wonder, with all the knowledge gained from LHC etc, how come we still cannot unify gravity into the standard model?, if this model does so well in predicting the macroscopic world eg the Chandraskar limit. Just makes me think that glossing over this indicates we dont have a complete picture of how nature works so I would temper the claims made thus far until we can achieve that consolidation
Awesome video. But the Y in Robyn Williams screwed me a bit.
Brain Cox!
Got the book.
hehe this is candid
Science should be based on reason alone, but on empirical evidence
As a teacher, I feel Like a moron...
Nice interview.
Now to look up 'non-equilibrium thermodynamics'.
Good luck with that, young Hog ... get back soon with all the info.
Thought this was going to be Brian Cox talking to Robin Williams... This wasn't as crazy as I'd geared myself up for :P
He might be because everything that can happen does happen.
Thank god & the Flying Spaghetti Monster that robin williams died !!!
do smart people like brian cox do normal stuff like watch friends and two and a half men ?
Do not ask such an offensive question about brilliant minds..... Now excuse me while I play flappy bird
bboyspinz I lol'd.
Only because science cannot prove a negative [ie everything that can happen does happen]
"Look! You are an idiot!" LOL!!
not quite true mass of some leptons such as electrons come from the higgs mechanism but most mass come from quarks. I am not an expert in this but maybe this video will help some: /watch?v=Ztc6QPNUqls
I'm worried if i read Brian's book i will mess up its quantum mass :)
Fuck he's the man.
DO, no. BE, yes.With a nearly infinite amount of time and energy to be it in. Then you get to share this data with the entire universe as Hawking data. Isn't sharing important? Don't be stingy, colid your verb!
Thumbs up if you came for Robin Williams.
RoadKillzine pretty much, not like Robin would interview Brian anyway
good choice ;)
The Joel Osteen of Physics.
oh shit i thought it said with robin williams lool
Is he always smiling?
Like the song goes...
Smiling faces sometimes pretend to be your friend
Smiling faces show no traces of the evil that lurks within
Smiling faces, smiling faces sometimes
They don't tell the truth uh
Smiling faces, smiling faces... Cox tells the truth!!
Bill A Well put .
MichaelKingsfordGray Why yes sir, it's called the British stiff upper lip... hehe
+Right Time. Yes, three orgasms a day has that effect ... shine on.
+Right Time Prof. Cox is a man who likes his job. It is his hobby. Don't you feel and hear how it sings in his speech?
He's a great thinker,
But its a shame that modern day science has limited itself, become a religion of its own. With priests, and FAITH. Yes faith.
Just look into renormalization and all the ramifications of that error.
Also, when they realized our universe was finely tuned to support life instead of realizing the awesomeness of that-they turned away from it and came up with the multiverse theory, and how there are an infinite number of universes, so its not surprising that ONE would be this way. Well does that sound like the simplest answer to you?
It sounds like they discovered something amazing and became afraid that their entire view of reality would change
Dan Notz Actually the multiverse is just a theory, no one is claiming it to be fact. That will always remain the difference between religion and science ... that science will never say with 100% certainty that a theory is true until it's actually proven to be true.
And btw if one universe is able to spring into existence one could think that whatever is outside the universe has this capability of "creating" a universe.
So if it inevitably creates one universe because anything that can happen will happen, then why not create more? Maybe even an infinite number.
It actually seems more unlikely to me that only one universe would come into existence .. i mean why just one ? or better yet how just one?
It doesn't seem like a far fetched idea to me but then again it's not something we know ... it's just one possibility we entertain .. the truth is we don't know and any real scientist would tell you the same ... we don't know ... that's honesty.
When
How many came here thinking it was Robin Williams? :P
Think his cheek bones were broken in this video
멋스런 핸드메이드 티셔츠가 잘어울려요😊
Science is popular, Science that hasn't been dumbed down is popular. Yet ABC TV shows 1/2 an hour of science about 20 times a year that's been dumbed down to the point it's actually wrong. Aunty, the way is clear, a decent science program, at least a couple of hours of content a week that's produced at a level suited to the *interested* and *enthusiastic* layman.
I'm trying to watch stargazing :(
this is where niel tyson got the idea for star talk... he stole brians concept lol
He'd probably think you'd been sent to him by conspiracy theorists! (Who he's not a fan of)
He's really not a very good physicist. He's just popular for some reason.
He is a professor of particle physics at Manchester Uni, he works at CERN and helped find the Higgs Particle. He a great Physicist, but remember his major is Particle Physics not Quantum Physics.
What are you basing your opinion on?
part of his human costume
Not the Robin Williams I was hoping for…
:P
Yeah...it is kind of feminine. But, what's wrong with that? Mick Jagger was massively feminine....but he got more girls in the 60s and 70s than you(assuming you're a guy) and I have in our entire lives times ten. Overly masculine men are pretty damn gross imo.
shoes
robin williams looked really different here, it must have been just before he died.
Islander73 ffs
Take more time getting dressed Brian what sort of scientist does not know how to put his tshirt on the right way round
He's a very likable and accomplished presenter, but I often feel he's a little closed minded about possibility.
/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXI
I often feel that way when watching scientists telling us "this is how it is".
I'm forty eight and I can count a few times that I've heard or read that "scientists now know that the age of the universe is..." only to have that revised a few years later.
All of that changed for me last year when I saw Brian Cox appear on the Colbert Report. Steven interviewed Brian in his usual zany style and asked him "what if you're wrong?" Brian's answer was "that would be great!"
Charles C Science changes its opinion when the facts show that it was wrong about something. That is reason to take science more seriously rather than less seriously.
I think your disconnect comes from science journalism when they report on individual studies about medical research. Individual pieces of research are meaningless on their own. What matters is follow up research by independent groups (something editors don't want to cover because it's not "new(s)"), and more importantly, the consensus opinion of scientists from the relevant field. Science reporters should be reporting on changes in consensus opinion instead of individual pieces of research, because that's what's important.
Thus you are told in one story that eating more of X is bad for you, then a few weeks later you read another story about another piece of research saying X is good for you. This is normal in science, but the reporters don't report on all the research on a given topic together, they just report on individual studies and present the results of those studies as fact when in fact each published paper is just a piece of a bigger puzzle.
Far too many scientists are.However,I'm not sure Brian Cox is the best example of this...
JanjayTrollface I really like the guy and he's far from the best example of closed mindedness for sure. In truth, he's probably seen as a rebel amongst his peers. I just wish he'd take that extra step. Peace Bro
Marry me Brian?
such shiny cheeks
I love Brian but his shiney english face makes me want to vomit.