It isnt a Dream Chaster issue, the issue is ULA backlog of launch flights for the US military which requires Vulcan to have two sucessfull flights before qualifying to fly a number of delayed flights which must take place before mid 2025.
Since Blue Origin began Spacex has launched 13 crewed flights, 30 cargo missions, and many (hundreds?) Of various orbital injections. Blue Origin has yet to orbit earth...even once.
What's going on with the Bezoz BE-4 engine. It seems everything associated with Mr. Bezoz is so slow it's perceived to have stopped. Blue Origin pull your finger out.
Falcon 9 could take up Dream Chaser. Inexcusable time delays are a continuous racket that's being played. Stop the rot or give it to SpaceX. Things gotta start happening and excuses gotta stop.
no. I really like Dream Chaser, but it is far behind where it should be. Not choosing SpaceX was a big mistake. Sierra Space does not have as much time as Boeing did to get it together.
What's the purpose of the Dreamchaser nowadays? The ISS is coming down in 5-6 years, so what sort of payloads need to be hauled up to the soon to be defunct ISS? Why are we paying bazillions of dollars to develop another high dollar pickup truck to hall one or two pieces short-lived specialty equipment the ISS? This no longer making sense. I loved the concept, but it needs a new mission to remain relevant.
Delays? Come on! Has New Glenn even launched yet? It's been 11 years. All these missions and no proof of concept for New Glenn. Not good enough. Not NASA'S fault. Vulcan uses BE-4 engines I believe. So start looking at Blue Origin's lack of application and honouring time constraints. Businessman engineer or mechanic they're all follow the same rule.
@@badbat01 I am comparing Space X to their NASA proposal. Do you actually think Starship is “on time”?? Its not. New Glenn is also delayed. Which was my original point. When you develop vehicles there are always delays. Funny how people here get their little feelings hurt..
@@thomaswakefield6889 Remember, Starship is supposed to deliver the lunar lander. It has to launch multiple times, refuel the lunar lander going to the Moon, to then land on the Moon. On the Artemis proposal, Space X claimed one year for flight test. Now, has it been more than a year of flight test? Yes or No? We know the answer dont we? Another way of saying it… Musk said 2 Starships to Mars 2022 and 4 in 2024… Are we late, yes or no? The answer is yes.. You are right to say Starship has flown. You are wrong to say they are not late. They are. Just like Orion flew to the Moon once, they were late and over budget. See how easy it is to tell yourself the truth?
Better than Rocket is here Easy lift off Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship No Fire No Explosion No Flame Just Spin and Lift off Powered by Baterry Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space Can lift more than 100 Ton Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity? It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums: A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time. The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof. . . In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like. People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
Rocket is complicated and dificulte Low safety and high cost We need somethings better Developing technologies to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability #FeelFree
I think it's mainly NASA (US government) money that's being wasted. NASA doesn't want to be dependent on just one company; unfortunately there's only one company that is succeeding in the space, largely because it has a business model that doesn't require NASA.
Dream Chaser originally appeared a great concept ! But it is way behind schedule and way over budget - The plain fact is, despite all its expensive Public Relations promotions, Dream Chaser is actually years away from carrying Astronauts into space !!!
Not a NASA launch. That one is on ULA to get certification to launch the contracted military missions. NASA has no missions booked with ULA on Vulcan. Yet. Even the test flight of DC is not technically a NASA mission, it is Sierra Space's mission to get their vehicle certified.
Yes but NASA needs to demand a launch date with a backup launch rocket or delay for 6 months. S.S. can launch on Super Heavy Booster with a larger second stage
Dreamchaser's biggest problem is Sue-LA and Sue Origin's inability to provide it with a ride to orbit. Sue-LA's Vulcan booster was delayed for years due to Sue Origin's inability to provide working BE-4 engines. Now that Sue-LA can get engines it needs to focus on what can most likely generate significant revenue - i.e. launching USSF payloads. Clearly Sierra Space (builder of the Dreamchaser) would like to see DC in orbit sooner rather than later. I suspect there is sufficient wiggle room in its contract with Sue-LA that it would not be feasible to sue ULA. One hopes ULA and Blue Origin will get their collective acts together and Dreamchaser will soon have an opportunity to show what it can do.
The last in-flight anomaly for SpaceX happened just a week ago. If you recorded this before that you should have edited that and corrected it. Dream Chaser does NOT have an "unconventional" landing method as it was used by the U.S. Space Shuttle, the Soviet Buran Shuttle and among current spacecraft is being used by the Boeing X-37. People keep forgetting the Boeing X-37 which has proved that Boeing CAN make a Spacecraft that can orbit for an extremely long duration, something that should make their repeated Starliner failures even more puzzling.
Good lord,can’t NASA get anything right? After the successes of the 60’s,the Space Shuttle,being mostly successful,except two accidents, NASA has just been a flop. If it weren’t for Elon Musk we wouldn’t have any presence in space,at least not without the generosity of the Russians.
Rocket is complicated and dificulte Low safety and high cost We need somethings better Developing technologies to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability #FeelFree
What we have is rockets, what we will have is rockets. What we need is better rockets or just not do anything. Many other fuel technologies are still rockets by definition.
The Dream Chaser launched by a Falcon would indeed be a high quality spectacle! ! But ! ! (because there must be a But) I am not sure that a payload intended to be launched by a ULA Vulcan could, like that, change its "taxi" to take a spaceX Falcon. ULA not being "on the best terms" with SpaceX, it is not impossible that a payload planned for a ULA launch would be very complicated to adapt to a Falcon; like the launcher/payload interface uses ULA patented technology (and ULA strangely refuses to sell a license to SpaceX). If it is undoubtedly possible to adapt a Ford engine in a GM car, in the world of space, each additional gram is very hotly discussed, we are clearly in the category of precision watches (and luxury given the prices practiced) rather than the manufacture of industrial machine tools. This type of adaptation to the launcher is foreseen from the drawing board and any modifications necessarily impose an additional mass and can take months of R&D and construction not to mention ground tests not to mention possible "administrative hassle"
Yes, but. I disagree it's a simple yes or no, Vulcan has only one successful launch, hardly a proven vehicle. We don't know what Blue Origin's production rate of flight worthy engines is either, which could delay schedules.
I wonder if NASA h as ever thought about adding on the international space station this how it would work they anew end on one part of the station and take part off the other part of the station and they would just go back forth until they have there new station built. Just an idea 💡 only
They'd be launching, if THEY WERE READY. They're not. While the actual spacecraft sits down at the Cape, they have not finalized their software and ULA couldn't wait any longer for them.
Boeing has shown just how incompetent they are with their failed Starliner. Which is way over budget and after years of designing and testing still isn't working. Blue Origin whines and cries about not getting NASA contracts but can't put anything into orbit. They can go up and down (something NASA did back in the early 1960s) and give rich people a ride I guess that's something. Sierra Space seems to be joining the club as just another company who over-promises and can't deliver. This is very frustrating for the American taxpayer because we're the ones ultimately funding the bill for these very expensive projects that go nowhere. SpaceX had been the only one that was consistently delivering but now even they are having problems. Seems that the outlet for the American space program is becoming very bleak
Well, i understand they want to be able to test ULA so that if there is a failure that it doesn't take DREAM Chaser with it? PErhaps Dream Chaser, should go to talk to Elon?
Second stage did work Initially but developed a leak and couldn't restart. For a lot of missions the restart isn't necessary. But yes, there is now that failure.
Better than Rocket is here Easy lift off Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship No Fire No Explosion No Flame Just Spin and Lift off Powered by Baterry Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space Can lift more than 100 Ton Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity? It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums: A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time. The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof. . . In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like. People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
Rocket is complicated and dificulte Low safety and high cost We need somethings better Developing technologies to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability #FeelFree
4:30 Dream Chaser is not a space plane you guys sound so stupid when you call it a space plane. It is a "lifting body" it cannot fly on its own It is not a plane of any kind it is not a space plane please stop calling it a space plane it's annoying
WTF this is a copy of a design developed by NASA (HL-20 though HL-42 was better) which was designed after analysis of pictures of the RUSSIAN BOR-4 which flew in 1980. A better name might be POKEY.
It isnt a Dream Chaster issue, the issue is ULA backlog of launch flights for the US military which requires Vulcan to have two sucessfull flights before qualifying to fly a number of delayed flights which must take place before mid 2025.
Since Blue Origin began Spacex has launched 13 crewed flights, 30 cargo missions, and many (hundreds?) Of various orbital injections. Blue Origin has yet to orbit earth...even once.
I think Elon should take this on and launch Dreamchaser on the Falcon Heavy!!??
Hey Sierra - Why don't you finish the heat shield tiles, put it on Spacex Heavy and u will have it in space in no time....
NASA is the operator, Sierra is the manufacturer. That’s the problem. NASA is difficult (kind).
What's going on with the Bezoz BE-4 engine. It seems everything associated with Mr. Bezoz is so slow it's perceived to have stopped. Blue Origin pull your finger out.
Falcon 9 could take up Dream Chaser. Inexcusable time delays are a continuous racket that's being played. Stop the rot or give it to SpaceX. Things gotta start happening and excuses gotta stop.
I dont understand why they dont reach out to SX.
no. I really like Dream Chaser, but it is far behind where it should be. Not choosing SpaceX was a big mistake. Sierra Space does not have as much time as Boeing did to get it together.
What's the purpose of the Dreamchaser nowadays? The ISS is coming down in 5-6 years, so what sort of payloads need to be hauled up to the soon to be defunct ISS? Why are we paying bazillions of dollars to develop another high dollar pickup truck to hall one or two pieces short-lived specialty equipment the ISS? This no longer making sense. I loved the concept, but it needs a new mission to remain relevant.
Why is Bezos even bothering with Project Kuiper? Starlink is so vastly, ludicrously ahead, it just seems wasteful as it has no chance.
No. Unless they use SpaceX
Damn only problems this week. Sucks
It's called progress not everything has to be Roses...
@@richiexp2 Yea I know it is still a pity
Your last post indicated that Space X is having a problem with the 2nd stage of Falcon 9.
Every vehicle is delayed. Including Stsrship. Delays are common. Hopefully Dreamchaser will become compatible with Falcon heavy
Delays? Come on! Has New Glenn even launched yet? It's been 11 years. All these missions and no proof of concept for New Glenn. Not good enough. Not NASA'S fault. Vulcan uses BE-4 engines I believe. So start looking at Blue Origin's lack of application and honouring time constraints. Businessman engineer or mechanic they're all follow the same rule.
@@badbat01 I am comparing Space X to their NASA proposal. Do you actually think Starship is “on time”?? Its not.
New Glenn is also delayed. Which was my original point. When you develop vehicles there are always delays.
Funny how people here get their little feelings hurt..
Starship hasn't been delayed, it's still going through flight testing. The difference is at least Starship has actually flown
@@thomaswakefield6889 Remember, Starship is supposed to deliver the lunar lander. It has to launch multiple times, refuel the lunar lander going to the Moon, to then land on the Moon. On the Artemis proposal, Space X claimed one year for flight test.
Now, has it been more than a year of flight test? Yes or No? We know the answer dont we?
Another way of saying it… Musk said 2 Starships to Mars 2022 and 4 in 2024… Are we late, yes or no?
The answer is yes..
You are right to say Starship has flown. You are wrong to say they are not late. They are. Just like Orion flew to the Moon once, they were late and over budget. See how easy it is to tell yourself the truth?
@@pedrosura SpaceX is displaying Starship's continuous improvement. All successful in their own way. I've yet to see New Glenn do anything.
Wow, I was in awe of NASA back in the 1960s, so much had been achieved compared to today's stalled programs!
Sierra Space will only launch this year if it can negotiate a ride with SpaceX
👍
I'm not sure Dream Chaser fits in the fairing of Falcon 9/FH.
@@slartybarfastb3648 Nothing money can't fix
just book a flight on SpaceX at least it will launch this year
Dream Chaser belongs to Sierra Space, NOT NASA. Very misleading title.
Better than Rocket is here
Easy lift off
Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship
No Fire
No Explosion
No Flame
Just Spin and
Lift off
Powered by Baterry
Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery
can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space
Can lift more than 100 Ton
Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity?
It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums:
A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time.
The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof.
.
.
In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like.
People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
Rocket is complicated and dificulte
Low safety and high cost
We need somethings better
Developing technologies to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability #FeelFree
Yes but ONLY if they transfer it to SpaceX. IMHO.
Hard to understand how their Investors have the patience to sit and watch thier $$$ wasted in such a monumental way.
I think it's mainly NASA (US government) money that's being wasted.
NASA doesn't want to be dependent on just one company; unfortunately there's only one company that is succeeding in the space, largely because it has a business model that doesn't require NASA.
I think Sierra space needs to change their alliegence with ula n blue origin maybe SpaceX or firefly
Dream Chaser originally appeared a great concept ! But it is way behind schedule and way over budget - The plain fact is, despite all its expensive Public Relations promotions, Dream Chaser is actually years away from carrying Astronauts into space !!!
Yeah!!! It’s quite expensive
Dream Chaser is needed, especially since Starliner is a lemon 🍋
Seems NASA is specialising in launching concrete blocks at the moment.
Not a NASA launch. That one is on ULA to get certification to launch the contracted military missions. NASA has no missions booked with ULA on Vulcan. Yet. Even the test flight of DC is not technically a NASA mission, it is Sierra Space's mission to get their vehicle certified.
Dream chaser's biggest problem is that they don't have their own launch vehicle and they went with ULA.
If they decide to launch on Spacex then I do think they could launch this year but if they wait for launch on a Vulcan rocket no.
Yes but NASA needs to demand a launch date with a backup launch rocket or delay for 6 months. S.S. can launch on Super Heavy Booster with a larger second stage
Dreamchaser's biggest problem is Sue-LA and Sue Origin's inability to provide it with a ride to orbit. Sue-LA's Vulcan booster was delayed for years due to Sue Origin's inability to provide working BE-4 engines. Now that Sue-LA can get engines it needs to focus on what can most likely generate significant revenue - i.e. launching USSF payloads. Clearly Sierra Space (builder of the Dreamchaser) would like to see DC in orbit sooner rather than later. I suspect there is sufficient wiggle room in its contract with Sue-LA that it would not be feasible to sue ULA. One hopes ULA and Blue Origin will get their collective acts together and Dreamchaser will soon have an opportunity to show what it can do.
One minute news stretched to 10 minutes video 😐
The last in-flight anomaly for SpaceX happened just a week ago. If you recorded this before that you should have edited that and corrected it. Dream Chaser does NOT have an "unconventional" landing method as it was used by the U.S. Space Shuttle, the Soviet Buran Shuttle and among current spacecraft is being used by the Boeing X-37.
People keep forgetting the Boeing X-37 which has proved that Boeing CAN make a Spacecraft that can orbit for an extremely long duration, something that should make their repeated Starliner failures even more puzzling.
Good lord,can’t NASA get anything right? After the successes of the 60’s,the Space Shuttle,being mostly successful,except two accidents, NASA has just been a flop. If it weren’t for Elon Musk we wouldn’t have any presence in space,at least not without the generosity of the Russians.
Rocket is complicated and dificulte
Low safety and high cost
We need somethings better
Developing technologies to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability #FeelFree
What we have is rockets, what we will have is rockets. What we need is better rockets or just not do anything. Many other fuel technologies are still rockets by definition.
Yes
The last in flight problem of Falcon 9 was last week and Falcon 9 is currently grounded.
Very sad that he isn’t aware of that very well known fact. Apparently this guy doesn’t follow any other space news sources.
NO
If they team up with SpaceX it would get them into space for sure
5:21 last flight failure is wrong robot Kevin. LOL
No
Your title is a grand example of 'yellow journalism' at it's best.
Er.
In the sense of "tabloid journalism", yes.
Pretty much every story is about what you'd expect from a channel called _GREAT SPACEX._
Still fun.
The Dream Chaser launched by a Falcon would indeed be a high quality spectacle! !
But ! ! (because there must be a But)
I am not sure that a payload intended to be launched by a ULA Vulcan could, like that, change its "taxi" to take a spaceX Falcon.
ULA not being "on the best terms" with SpaceX, it is not impossible that a payload planned for a ULA launch would be very complicated to adapt to a Falcon; like the launcher/payload interface uses ULA patented technology (and ULA strangely refuses to sell a license to SpaceX).
If it is undoubtedly possible to adapt a Ford engine in a GM car, in the world of space, each additional gram is very hotly discussed, we are clearly in the category of precision watches (and luxury given the prices practiced) rather than the manufacture of industrial machine tools.
This type of adaptation to the launcher is foreseen from the drawing board and any modifications necessarily impose an additional mass and can take months of R&D and construction not to mention ground tests not to mention possible "administrative hassle"
Dream Chaser was intended to be functional with multiple rocket platforms Including some upcoming Japanese rockets.
Excellent stuff bro
The heat shield is 80% missing... (untested heat shield). How risky is it to build a perfect vehicle with no tested systems?
I have high hopes for Dream Chaser too. But it has to launch in order to prove itself.
Yes, but. I disagree it's a simple yes or no, Vulcan has only one successful launch, hardly a proven vehicle. We don't know what Blue Origin's production rate of flight worthy engines is either, which could delay schedules.
I have something Elon Musk will never have…..
Enough.
Could it be that the Penegon and others didn't want to risk the Dream Chaser? Sounds like it to me. Is the new ULA rocket a bit risky?
All the time Sierra Nevada waits around for a Vulcan lift to to Space, they will remain a Dream-Chaser!
I wonder if NASA h as ever thought about adding on the international space station this how it would work they anew end on one part of the station and take part off the other part of the station and they would just go back forth until they have there new station built. Just an idea 💡 only
Dream caser should move to spacex so they can launch sooner
They'd be launching, if THEY WERE READY. They're not. While the actual spacecraft sits down at the Cape, they have not finalized their software and ULA couldn't wait any longer for them.
Thanks 🙏 great video 👍
Thanks
go with spacex ffs
No!
Sierra should look for a new partner.
Am I hearing SpaceX?
I hope Dream Chaser will launch this year!
HAS a big . . .
USFF?
NO!
on vulcan..no..
Boeing has shown just how incompetent they are with their failed Starliner. Which is way over budget and after years of designing and testing still isn't working. Blue Origin whines and cries about not getting NASA contracts but can't put anything into orbit. They can go up and down (something NASA did back in the early 1960s) and give rich people a ride I guess that's something. Sierra Space seems to be joining the club as just another company who over-promises and can't deliver. This is very frustrating for the American taxpayer because we're the ones ultimately funding the bill for these very expensive projects that go nowhere. SpaceX had been the only one that was consistently delivering but now even they are having problems. Seems that the outlet for the American space program is becoming very bleak
SpaceX had one anomaly out of hundreds of launches made with a cadence that has never been attempted before. I think they're going to be fine.
No.
Fly cargo missions so Dream Chaser can prove itself either way.
Wow! Old info! DeLux!
💥 BIG Problem 💥
N9 it's July it's August
Nope..
Alguém assistindo??🤩🤩🤩
1:47 Can any engineer, or smart normie chime in? Why are they vibration testing the craft without even having all of it's heat tiles on?
Falcon9?
but can ith put 100 tom in to space,
Dream Chaser that is Sierra Space has got some technical genius however the management is eat up with stupid.
david
They wanted it delayed, Nasa and ULA to give Boeing a shot. We see how that worked out. 😅😊😂
No, not this year.
Well, i understand they want to be able to test ULA so that if there is a failure that it doesn't take DREAM Chaser with it? PErhaps Dream Chaser, should go to talk to Elon?
No.
It’ll be mid 25
Probably not until 2026 or later
TOO Small
"June 2015"? Err... pretty sure Falcon 9 very recently failed with it's second stage not firing, then exploding...
Second stage did work Initially but developed a leak and couldn't restart.
For a lot of missions the restart isn't necessary.
But yes, there is now that failure.
Sierra Nevada, you paired with the wrong company. End of story. Told you so. Time for a rethink.🤔
No, not unless they can go to Space X.
"Dream Chaser"
Silly ass name.
Change it.
The Puzzzy, The Money, and the Mic Chaser??
Dream Weaver?
@@tomsanders5584Love it 😂
Fred?
@@paulboger7377
I miss "Apollo" ...
Fat chance
No . Anything NASA has been involved with lately has had problems. To much priority put on DEI than qualified people it seems.
This is why SLS is a big joke
Better than Rocket is here
Easy lift off
Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship
No Fire
No Explosion
No Flame
Just Spin and
Lift off
Powered by Baterry
Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery
can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space
Can lift more than 100 Ton
Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity?
It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums:
A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time.
The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof.
.
.
In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like.
People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
Rocket is complicated and dificulte
Low safety and high cost
We need somethings better
Developing technologies to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability #FeelFree
You realize DEI is just code for the n-word, right?
All the problems in the world are DEI, although Musk doesn't hire minorities.
They should have worked with Elon Musk and Space X earlier. 😊
4:30 Dream Chaser is not a space plane you guys sound so stupid when you call it a space plane. It is a "lifting body" it cannot fly on its own It is not a plane of any kind it is not a space plane please stop calling it a space plane it's annoying
Dream Chaser will fly in 2025
To nobodys surprise....
When is this BS DEI going to STOP!
ULA Vulcan will shake the DreamChaser apart at launch
The whole problem is that NASA has it's hands in it. NASA has out lived it's need. Over cost all ways behind the time line.
WTF this is a copy of a design developed by NASA (HL-20 though HL-42 was better) which was designed after analysis of pictures of the RUSSIAN BOR-4 which flew in 1980.
A better name might be POKEY.
All space planned have failed🤔...
Your comments are based in very speculative data. Not very accurate or informative. Sierra Space knows what it’s doing
Anything that relies on blue origin will likely not happen anytime soon.
No
NO
No.
No
No
NO
No
No
No
No