Lec 44: Alienation, Labour and Human Nature | Karl Marx

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 дек 2024

Комментарии • 32

  • @drashtigupta8287
    @drashtigupta8287 Месяц назад +3

    Mahabharat mein guru druonaacharya ne tak dakshina leli thi pandavo se panchal ka yuddh jeetva kar ...... lekin you are the one teacher jisne sociology optional itna accha pdha kar ...apni tareef krne ke liye apna channel par name tk nhi btaya ..... itna connect kar liya hain sir apse apke students ka itna haq to bnta h ki apka nam jan ske.........

  • @mukeshlabana7499
    @mukeshlabana7499 Год назад +2

    big bow to this kind of teachers ,love from gujarat
    🙇‍♂

  • @shashwata007able
    @shashwata007able 2 года назад +4

    Loved it sir. Regained my 'totality' after watching your beautiful and logical expression. Thank u sir

  • @sreedevia7438
    @sreedevia7438 2 года назад +1

    Clear and holistic explanations. Thank you sir

  • @rituyadav2255
    @rituyadav2255 Год назад +1

    Wonderful explanation sir thank you so much

  • @poshidaehsass7521
    @poshidaehsass7521 Год назад +1

    What ana amazing and brilliant class as well as such good examples. Thank you sir 😊

  • @KuldeepYadav-og2sn
    @KuldeepYadav-og2sn Год назад

    Bhai I commented earlier also...your way of delivering lecture..and explaining concept is super se bhi upar....thanku for such lectures...which big coaching centres not providing even after paying huge cost....again thanku from core of my heart...and great success in your future endeavours...

  • @MS-lz8qu
    @MS-lz8qu 2 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot for your invaluable lectures Sir ❤️

  • @pallavicharnalia1287
    @pallavicharnalia1287 2 года назад +1

    What a brilliant lecture 👏

  • @ravishankarpatel9478
    @ravishankarpatel9478 10 месяцев назад

    Now I am enlightened❤

  • @vishalsutar1326
    @vishalsutar1326 2 года назад +1

    Just amazing thanks sir

  • @Akashupsc
    @Akashupsc Год назад

    It is very helpful sir

  • @nanditaswargiary7199
    @nanditaswargiary7199 2 года назад +1

    Thanks sir

  • @NoName-sc3iz
    @NoName-sc3iz Год назад

    Thank you so much 🙏.

  • @ayushijain7300
    @ayushijain7300 Год назад

    Thank you so much sir ji 🤍💜💚❤️

  • @devipriya_20
    @devipriya_20 Год назад

    Thank you soo much Sir🙏

  • @nehalchauhan2253
    @nehalchauhan2253 2 года назад

    thank you sir

  • @Thefirstopinion.
    @Thefirstopinion. 2 года назад

    Thanks sir.

  • @py5935
    @py5935 2 года назад

    thanks a lot

  • @RajatDubey
    @RajatDubey 2 года назад

    Thank you so much sir

  • @letsstudy6904
    @letsstudy6904 2 года назад +1

    Thank you so much sir
    sir please can you write in a little bold form it would look more clear thank you sir

  • @Aspirant635
    @Aspirant635 2 года назад

    No words can define ur level of knowledge and conceptual clarity.
    Literally dhandha band ho jaega bade bade cc ka

  • @yashjain7035
    @yashjain7035 2 года назад +1

    So sir, does it means that, as per Hegel that from the very beginning of human kind , subject and object were always apart from each other and they will be coinciding only when true consciousness is achieved, as according to hegelian explanation consciousness develops over the time period ???
    And also that man from very beginning is an alienated being??

  • @iamdevansh
    @iamdevansh Год назад +1

    SIr don,t u think somehow Objectification from Thought or imagination is an examole of dialectical idealism whereas marx talks about materialism.

    • @vishalsharma_0705
      @vishalsharma_0705 Год назад +3

      Nope, Hegel says that only internal reality is the only reality that is prime reality..what we see is the reflection of the prime reality..but here Marx through objectification says that material being that determines our consciousness and this consciousness is manifested through our labour..

  • @sphinxbuzz2164
    @sphinxbuzz2164 Год назад +1

    Just a small doubt.
    Sir, Marx's theory of the nature and production of knowledge is anti-positivistic and he says that science should be critical. As far as I know he doesn't claim himself a POSITIVIST. So, should I mention him as a positivist or not in an answer? as you've mentioned him as a positivist in some of your lectures.

    • @kaarwan-e-upsc
      @kaarwan-e-upsc  Год назад +2

      Just mention that Marx appears to be a positivist when he studies and analyses capitalist MOP on basis of facts and data....when he prescribes revolution and imagines a communist utopia, he is more of a idealist.....but there is a positivist tinge in his sociological writing as these were based on extensive economic data....But we can't explicitly categorise him as a positivist.

    • @sphinxbuzz2164
      @sphinxbuzz2164 Год назад +1

      @@kaarwan-e-upsc Okay, thankyou sir.

  • @anshujha401
    @anshujha401 Год назад +1

    Thank u sir 😊

  • @vaishaliyadav9050
    @vaishaliyadav9050 Год назад

    Thanks sir 😊