Mahabharat mein guru druonaacharya ne tak dakshina leli thi pandavo se panchal ka yuddh jeetva kar ...... lekin you are the one teacher jisne sociology optional itna accha pdha kar ...apni tareef krne ke liye apna channel par name tk nhi btaya ..... itna connect kar liya hain sir apse apke students ka itna haq to bnta h ki apka nam jan ske.........
Bhai I commented earlier also...your way of delivering lecture..and explaining concept is super se bhi upar....thanku for such lectures...which big coaching centres not providing even after paying huge cost....again thanku from core of my heart...and great success in your future endeavours...
So sir, does it means that, as per Hegel that from the very beginning of human kind , subject and object were always apart from each other and they will be coinciding only when true consciousness is achieved, as according to hegelian explanation consciousness develops over the time period ??? And also that man from very beginning is an alienated being??
Nope, Hegel says that only internal reality is the only reality that is prime reality..what we see is the reflection of the prime reality..but here Marx through objectification says that material being that determines our consciousness and this consciousness is manifested through our labour..
Just a small doubt. Sir, Marx's theory of the nature and production of knowledge is anti-positivistic and he says that science should be critical. As far as I know he doesn't claim himself a POSITIVIST. So, should I mention him as a positivist or not in an answer? as you've mentioned him as a positivist in some of your lectures.
Just mention that Marx appears to be a positivist when he studies and analyses capitalist MOP on basis of facts and data....when he prescribes revolution and imagines a communist utopia, he is more of a idealist.....but there is a positivist tinge in his sociological writing as these were based on extensive economic data....But we can't explicitly categorise him as a positivist.
Mahabharat mein guru druonaacharya ne tak dakshina leli thi pandavo se panchal ka yuddh jeetva kar ...... lekin you are the one teacher jisne sociology optional itna accha pdha kar ...apni tareef krne ke liye apna channel par name tk nhi btaya ..... itna connect kar liya hain sir apse apke students ka itna haq to bnta h ki apka nam jan ske.........
big bow to this kind of teachers ,love from gujarat
🙇♂
Loved it sir. Regained my 'totality' after watching your beautiful and logical expression. Thank u sir
Clear and holistic explanations. Thank you sir
Wonderful explanation sir thank you so much
What ana amazing and brilliant class as well as such good examples. Thank you sir 😊
Bhai I commented earlier also...your way of delivering lecture..and explaining concept is super se bhi upar....thanku for such lectures...which big coaching centres not providing even after paying huge cost....again thanku from core of my heart...and great success in your future endeavours...
Thanks a lot for your invaluable lectures Sir ❤️
What a brilliant lecture 👏
Now I am enlightened❤
Just amazing thanks sir
It is very helpful sir
Thanks sir
Thank you so much 🙏.
Thank you so much sir ji 🤍💜💚❤️
Thank you soo much Sir🙏
thank you sir
Thanks sir.
thanks a lot
Thank you so much sir
Thank you so much sir
sir please can you write in a little bold form it would look more clear thank you sir
No words can define ur level of knowledge and conceptual clarity.
Literally dhandha band ho jaega bade bade cc ka
So sir, does it means that, as per Hegel that from the very beginning of human kind , subject and object were always apart from each other and they will be coinciding only when true consciousness is achieved, as according to hegelian explanation consciousness develops over the time period ???
And also that man from very beginning is an alienated being??
Yes.
SIr don,t u think somehow Objectification from Thought or imagination is an examole of dialectical idealism whereas marx talks about materialism.
Nope, Hegel says that only internal reality is the only reality that is prime reality..what we see is the reflection of the prime reality..but here Marx through objectification says that material being that determines our consciousness and this consciousness is manifested through our labour..
Just a small doubt.
Sir, Marx's theory of the nature and production of knowledge is anti-positivistic and he says that science should be critical. As far as I know he doesn't claim himself a POSITIVIST. So, should I mention him as a positivist or not in an answer? as you've mentioned him as a positivist in some of your lectures.
Just mention that Marx appears to be a positivist when he studies and analyses capitalist MOP on basis of facts and data....when he prescribes revolution and imagines a communist utopia, he is more of a idealist.....but there is a positivist tinge in his sociological writing as these were based on extensive economic data....But we can't explicitly categorise him as a positivist.
@@kaarwan-e-upsc Okay, thankyou sir.
Thank u sir 😊
Thanks sir 😊