New 9-Seater "Chevrolet" ISV in Action - M1301 Infantry Squad Vehicle

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 476

  • @Tikii_9
    @Tikii_9 10 дней назад +31

    I was in the 82nd Airborne in the 1st Brigade Combat Team, I went into the field for 2 weeks to test these out as one of the first soldiers to drive them, we had lots of fun with them in JRTC and so on. Gets stuck in soft squishy terrain like most vics, but it hauls ass. Long story short I think its only good for dismount and recon, or raids.

    • @0331longrifle
      @0331longrifle 9 дней назад +2

      That’s how it will be used. We’ve been using these kinds of vehicles for decades

    • @davidgoodnow269
      @davidgoodnow269 9 дней назад +2

      Thing is crazy loud, horrible for recon.

    • @MaxEPR
      @MaxEPR 9 дней назад +1

      Were you able to pressure down the tires and then reinflate them? Did they even teach you that? It's a squad delivery system. Looks like a scaled-up SOV vehicle.

    • @Tikii_9
      @Tikii_9 8 дней назад

      @@MaxEPR I was a paratrooper, not a leg infantrymen. We had the mechanics do such activities. All we did was PMCS the vics.

    • @Tikii_9
      @Tikii_9 8 дней назад +2

      @@MaxEPR Its also the smartest military vic ive drove, its got a nice touch screen on the dash, and the dash looks clean. Big computer inside.

  • @dw7094
    @dw7094 11 дней назад +27

    What's old is new again. In the late 70's and early 80's, the 9th ID at Ft Lewis tested vehicles like this for the concept of motorized infantry. The concept was scrapped in favor of the failed Light Infantry Divisions. The Army is good at reinventing stuff.

  • @jamesweeg6545
    @jamesweeg6545 8 дней назад +8

    Back in the early 90s they toyed with the FAV (fast attack vehicle) which really just a dune buggy with a machine gun on the roll cage. This looks like the next generation of that.

  • @josephbicknell6522
    @josephbicknell6522 10 дней назад +44

    "It's raining, it's snowing, it's 115 degrees. It is 3 below zero with a wind chill of minus 17..... Who the hell thought this was a good idea" anonymous 18 year old and 25 year old sergeant.

    • @MaxEPR
      @MaxEPR 9 дней назад +8

      Infantry = Footmobile. Would you rather walk in those conditions?

    • @Chilly_Billy
      @Chilly_Billy 8 дней назад +4

      ​​@@MaxEPR
      In some ways it would be better. Far less wind blowing rain, sleet, and snow in your face. Wind chill would be dramatically lower for a foot soldier compared to someone driving in a totally open vehicle with a 20/30/40mph headwind.

    • @MaxEPR
      @MaxEPR 8 дней назад +1

      @@Chilly_Billy pretty sure cold, young, troopers will find a fix for that to keep from walking. 😉

    • @fatotis6273
      @fatotis6273 8 дней назад +1

      My Grandfathers In WWII and friends in Vietnam thought open vehicles were great and worked great for them.

    • @SpaceRanger187
      @SpaceRanger187 8 дней назад +1

      @@fatotis6273 Different times. Drones are no joke in warfare now. Only going to get a lot worse

  • @tb3687
    @tb3687 6 дней назад +4

    So we had the hmmwv which was too lightly armored, hung too much armor on it to where it wasn’t practical. Needed big bulky heavy trucks to replace the hmmwv. Now we need a light vehicle again. Sounds about right.

  • @kevinedwards7206
    @kevinedwards7206 12 дней назад +19

    great in the rain too!

  • @braddavison1289
    @braddavison1289 13 дней назад +25

    Didn’t they just basically phase out the hmmwv because it didn’t have enough protection?

    • @BillLaBrie
      @BillLaBrie 7 дней назад

      Yeah, so why even pretend? You’re on your own, boys!

  • @paulm1365
    @paulm1365 12 дней назад +8

    It will be great to take through the drive through. Everyone will be able to get coffee and donuts easily. And soldiers can no longer complain about the lack of armour in the doors. 😂

  • @dm75thRanger
    @dm75thRanger 5 дней назад +3

    As a forward observer, this would be a great target.

  • @richardkennedy815
    @richardkennedy815 12 дней назад +30

    Personally Chevy should make the M1301 available to EVERYONE.

    • @31terikennedy
      @31terikennedy 8 дней назад +1

      Like the HMVEE it will.

    • @jimlarkin7859
      @jimlarkin7859 7 дней назад

      They would sell a ton and compete directly with Jeep

    • @31terikennedy
      @31terikennedy 7 дней назад

      ​@@jimlarkin7859 Looks like something Road Kill would have come up with. :) Bring back the 1/4 ton.

    • @31terikennedy
      @31terikennedy 7 дней назад

      At least it has doors to keep the rain out. :D

    • @xanderjackson8518
      @xanderjackson8518 6 дней назад +1

      You could probably make a better one if you're resourceful enough.

  • @TanklessPro
    @TanklessPro 6 дней назад +3

    Chevrolet…….lol. I have had mine for 8 months and it’s been in the shop for a running total of 3 months. It has currently been in the shop since the first week in December.

  • @DCI_LeoDan_
    @DCI_LeoDan_ 10 дней назад +6

    The Halo M15 Razorback in the real world!? LET'S GO!!! 💪

  • @brokenwrench404
    @brokenwrench404 13 дней назад +118

    The designers must not be paying attention to the drone warfare in Ukraine. The passengers have less protection than a humvee!

    • @natodeltaforce342
      @natodeltaforce342 13 дней назад +23

      no you just don't understand modern warfare plus it could be fitted with anti drone jammers and kill systems

    • @stunick1573
      @stunick1573 13 дней назад +11

      @@natodeltaforce342 Like the two rear seat guys holding shotguns? Cause didn't see a whole lot of extra space with the gear they were putting on it. Where is the air guard ? Infantry never travel even 50 to 100 miles from the front without air guards up. And in Panama, Iraq and Afghanistan you needed air guards every time you left the wire.

    • @dannyzero692
      @dannyzero692 13 дней назад +24

      These things are meant to be issued to light infantry and IBCTs (Infantry Battalion Combat Team) who were previously unmotorized to give them more speed and maneuvering options. Those guys never had vehicles much so this is an upgrade without turning them into mechanized infantry.
      They want it to be highly deployable without impacting the IBCT's operation too much, hence why they dropped the armor so they could fly them inside CH-47 Chinooks. They'll take the loads off the infantry and wouldn't force them to march everywhere.
      Using what basically amounts civilian cars for frontal assault like how Russia sometimes does is foolhardy though.

    • @stunick1573
      @stunick1573 13 дней назад +4

      @@dannyzero692 Who stays with them? Does the support platoon drive them in support? Or do the infantry squads have to give up guys to drive and TC them and then who stays with them? Ft Lewis tried this crap called Motorized Infantry they ended up giving Strikers to Lewis, failed concept. We did the motorized infantry in Kosovo and Iraq. Who stays with the trucks when the dismounts leave to fight? I had to leave guys to sit with the trucks or another squad had to drop us off. All these trucks who's doing the driving and TC'ing?

    • @__Oleg
      @__Oleg 13 дней назад +6

      @@natodeltaforce342 I think you don't quite understand what is FPV drone and what is anti-drone jammer.
      First, anti-drone jammer is a powerful radio emitting device. Without metal cage protecting soldiers they will be exposed to powerful emission and may end up with cancer quite soon. It boild people brains. It's like microwave and it's almost as powerful if you add all frequency bands.
      Second, there are FPV drones with fiberoptice that can not be jammed. There drones with AI-based computer vision that homing on the target making jammers ineffective.
      This thing can not get closer to the frontline than 20-30 miles without risk of being taken out with $500-700 drone.

  • @brokenwrench404
    @brokenwrench404 13 дней назад +15

    That’s a tight fit in a chinook!

    • @Condor1970
      @Condor1970 11 дней назад

      But it fits. Just like the old H1.

    • @danm1640
      @danm1640 10 дней назад +1

      That's what she said.

    • @shooter575
      @shooter575 9 дней назад +2

      I wanted to see the driver dismount

  • @brianjones1151
    @brianjones1151 10 дней назад +6

    Good job it's not raining !!😊

  • @alanb9337
    @alanb9337 13 дней назад +9

    Looks like the kind of vehicle the Darpa robots are going to ride around in.

  • @ice-cold4342
    @ice-cold4342 9 дней назад +3

    better than walking everywhere loaded like a mule

  • @juanramsauer
    @juanramsauer 8 дней назад +4

    South Africa used vehicles like this during the bush war in Angola 40-50 years ago called the Sabre assault vehicle.. build on converted Landcruiser or Landrover chassis.

  • @qinarizonaful
    @qinarizonaful 8 дней назад +10

    Don't worry about protection! They will retrofit load it down with 1/2 tonne of armor and complain the tubular chassis breakes! They could do a lot with blast deflecting kevlar panels up top, double wall with AR500 steel inner liners to reject drone strikes, and a jammer platform for jammer de jour!! This would provide soldier removable rain and low temp protection.❤

  • @schlirf
    @schlirf 8 дней назад +18

    Wow, I remember those! Back in the day, we called them Jeeps, or M-151A2s to be exact; cost about $1000 or less to produce.

    • @scotanderson6857
      @scotanderson6857 7 дней назад +2

      These are $155,000!

    • @Veritas419
      @Veritas419 7 дней назад +1

      Ok boomer, adjusted for inflation the Army was paying about $28,000 for a new m-151

    • @rotaryenginepete
      @rotaryenginepete 7 дней назад +2

      how do you remember them when these just came out lol

    • @s.porter8646
      @s.porter8646 7 дней назад

      ​@@Veritas419hahahaha ok Z-MER

    • @schlirf
      @schlirf 6 дней назад

      @@rotaryenginepete Through the power of Sarcasm?

  • @markfisher8206
    @markfisher8206 6 дней назад +1

    Wow this is a vast improvement over the dodge 3/4 ton trucks we had in the 50’s and 60’s NOT!

  • @norinaka101
    @norinaka101 10 дней назад +8

    ジュラシックパークに出てきそうなジープです😄👍⭐

  • @Apoc_Bone_Daddy
    @Apoc_Bone_Daddy 7 дней назад +1

    Can't wait til they're on the surplus market 🤤

  • @StoshRoberts
    @StoshRoberts 6 дней назад

    Wow, an updated modern Military GrossMobile. I Love It! I want one!

  • @gbel9295
    @gbel9295 9 дней назад +3

    It's not a military vehicle unless it sounds like its going to fall apart around you...NFS brothers!!!

  • @howlow2368
    @howlow2368 13 дней назад +8

    かっこいい!

  • @gregbailey1753
    @gregbailey1753 8 дней назад +9

    Folks, it isn't intended to be an IFV or APC, it is transportation. Doing a 25 mile approach march with 50-60 lbs will take the starch out of you as will several miles after a jump or air assault to get to the objective. A UH-60 could easily sling load 1 with th squad on the bird. If you had armor and all the bells and whistles you could not use it. I had several 25 milers during my 11A days and to think of fighting immediately after is scary. 20 of those miles in one of these would save alot of fatigue and ultimately alot of lives.

  • @texasaggie8449
    @texasaggie8449 6 дней назад +1

    Looks like something we use in south Texas deer hunting

  • @Willie769-cl2bw
    @Willie769-cl2bw 12 дней назад +4

    So glad the Canadian government bought these for our troops in Latvia. 😂

  • @anthonystone2089
    @anthonystone2089 6 дней назад

    Those are great if you are in a area where you can move in a uncontested without fear of ambush.

  • @halcon2134
    @halcon2134 11 дней назад +3

    I already said it, I have worked as a bodybuilder in car workshops and I have had cars on the chassis, it gives the impression that they run faster and are very powerful but that is not true. It will rain and not just water, it will be cold and they are not for going to drink beer. put a little kiblar at least.
    My army does the same, spending money on favors and paying friends more than on what really matters.

  • @Kriss_L
    @Kriss_L 12 дней назад +6

    So they took the doors & "skin" off of a HUMVEE? Pretty sure Bubba has been doing that for decades for his mud-rig.

  • @acersalman8258
    @acersalman8258 9 дней назад

    Beautiful trucks ❤

  • @pezpengy9308
    @pezpengy9308 10 дней назад +1

    yeah, they were tooling around wahiawa outside schofield barracks in one of those things. theyre supposed to be working they shouldnt look like theyre having so much fun!

    • @pukavoket
      @pukavoket 4 дня назад

      "If you are not having fun, you are doing it wrong"! 😁

  • @Dex01-Z_WingZero
    @Dex01-Z_WingZero 5 дней назад +2

    I'd feel safer in a humvee. They would be better off having armoured up side by sides

  • @Condor1970
    @Condor1970 11 дней назад +3

    As much as I love the HUMVEE, it was always a drastically overpriced and underperforming platform for the investment.
    This particular idea seems much more financially reasonable and capable for its intended purpose.

    • @JeffEbe-te2xs
      @JeffEbe-te2xs 10 дней назад

      Basic model was 25000

    • @Condor1970
      @Condor1970 10 дней назад

      @JeffEbe-te2xs req was $25k in the first Gulf War, when I served. I'm sure it's double that or more by now.

  • @amburgeyjamie4291
    @amburgeyjamie4291 13 дней назад +5

    It even has the easy bailout system for anti drone warfare 😀

  • @petemolnar6073
    @petemolnar6073 7 дней назад

    Props for using the Diesel Duramax option!

    • @billradley
      @billradley 7 дней назад +1

      Yeah, the timing belt on the back of the motor screams “field serviceable.”

  • @John_Redcorn_
    @John_Redcorn_ 10 дней назад +16

    Ppl screaming ‘it has no protection!’ dont understand the purpose and roles of different vehicles. Not every vehicle can be (or needs to be) a main battle tank.

    • @Folker46590
      @Folker46590 10 дней назад

      Sure, but how well will it do when it's raining, or you're on an operation in winter, like in the Ukraine. It's a glorified death trap. How are they supposed to mount an air guard against drones? This is just a cheap way to get soldiers killed.

    • @SteelDoesMyWill
      @SteelDoesMyWill 10 дней назад +3

      If it can't even defend light small arms fire it has no place on the battle field.

    • @John_Redcorn_
      @John_Redcorn_ 9 дней назад +2

      @ it has 9 troops on it: thats your defense. And 100% theyll stick an M2 on top.

    • @digger1825
      @digger1825 9 дней назад +1

      So genius where would they use this? Please enlighten us dumb people!

    • @digger1825
      @digger1825 9 дней назад

      ​@@John_Redcorn_So you're thinking is that the protection from bullets from IEDs from everything else is that don't worry it will hit the guys first and that will protect the vehicle That's your thinking is that the guys are protecting the vehicle not the vehicle is supposed to protect the guys. Well that's the dumbest thing I've heard in a long time😅😅😅

  • @patrickedgewood8598
    @patrickedgewood8598 6 дней назад

    These are based of the Chevrolet ZR2 drivetrain. They’ve been manufacturing them about 3-4 years. Same drivetrain as my ZR2 Colorado Bison.

  • @donyoung5091
    @donyoung5091 5 дней назад

    My understanding is that these vehicles are intended to move light infantry units (think 82nd and 101st) from their drop zones to CLOSE TO the battle, upon which time they dismount and fight without vehicles. It makes to 20 mile hike and 18 mile drive + 2 mile hike.
    There are not intended to be used where there is a decent chance of a fight.
    That said, “Don’t SF and recon units drive around in basically unprotected vehicles? Why can’t the airborne!?”
    Someone’s going to get hurt re-learning that lesson.

    • @stunick1573
      @stunick1573 5 дней назад

      Who stays with it? Anytime you bring a vehicle you have drivers and TC's. Where they come from? Who stays with the vehicles when the Infantry drop off to fight? That's the Cavalry problem stay and fight you have to cover your horses and if you depart from the horse's' who rides them back? You going to just drive up in 155K vehicle and deploy and what leave em parked at the 7/11? Somebody is gonna be signing for those toys and that somebody is gonna wanna not pay for it.

    • @donyoung5091
      @donyoung5091 5 дней назад

      @ good point!

  • @HASHAMEssa-r6t
    @HASHAMEssa-r6t 8 дней назад

    ❤beautiful

  • @jeromefaga8208
    @jeromefaga8208 13 дней назад +28

    So we dumped millions of dollars of heavily armored vehicles to our enemy., And now fielding beefed up ATVs with no protection to the Future fighting force.

    • @kskeel1124
      @kskeel1124 13 дней назад +1

      Yup...

    • @cwwcww7465
      @cwwcww7465 13 дней назад

      @@jeromefaga8208 no, WE did not do anything.....Barack Hussein Obama is the muslim , John Brennan is the other muslim and both hate America, both have direct ties to Saudi Arabia and both desperately need the middle east unstable for the next 4 years...... but within their ability to community organize it...
      Joe can't even go to kitchen and get his ice cream without permission from his staffer handlers Barry hand picked and installed into Jobamas staff.............
      So, Obama made that call to leave the equipment.....
      Obama is also now worth 809 million dollars 💸......729 ish million of that is in hidden offshore holdings.....
      But,
      Semper Fi ..... right?

    • @al28854
      @al28854 13 дней назад +6

      these newish vehicles are design to be merely transport/shuttles to get the infantry across 'uncontested' territories

    • @templar1694
      @templar1694 12 дней назад

      Will likely be used by the national guards.

  • @유희석-j6u
    @유희석-j6u 3 дня назад

    Rock tire and frame skeleton are good.

  • @donberg01
    @donberg01 11 дней назад +1

    Looks like fun, where can I buy one! Beats the jacked-up pink'em up trucks you see here in Caly!!!!

  • @michaelj4729
    @michaelj4729 12 дней назад +2

    Seems to have the armor of a golf cart

  • @陳韋巡
    @陳韋巡 7 дней назад

    看起來很棒。有鉤子可以當拖車用。

  • @mikelynn9281
    @mikelynn9281 7 дней назад +2

    As long as it doesnt run like a new chevy silverado 3.0 diesel they should be good....

  • @lucashinoue2071
    @lucashinoue2071 13 дней назад +1

    Nice vehicle! 🪖🫡🇺🇸

    • @stunick1573
      @stunick1573 13 дней назад +2

      For what? It rattles and shakes. You'll either freeze your butts off in cold, get wet beyond belief in rain or become a giant dust ball on any back roads. No protection, all aluminum, only side shooters, no air guards. What exactly is this thing but a cheap transport sold at four times the cost. Infantry squads are 9 to 11 guys, no squad is ever fully manned. So 9 seats each but with interpreter you need 10 seats you'll have to leave guys back or take two trucks per squad. Thats two air guards, two drivers, two TC's and one interpreter. No one ever trains with an interpreter but you'll have one per squad any time you leave the wire in real war zones. Trail vehicles eat shit tons of dust. You'll want doors and a lid that means air and heat.

  • @govindram6557-gw1ry
    @govindram6557-gw1ry 2 дня назад

    100% Sunroof people in India will love that😂😂😂

  • @raytaylor3077
    @raytaylor3077 13 дней назад +18

    good for kamikazi drones

  • @templar1694
    @templar1694 12 дней назад +3

    This vehicles will likely be heavily used by the respective national guards of each states in the USA.

    • @PrograError
      @PrograError 12 дней назад

      I see this as an easy replacement for some of the HMMWVs

  • @robertopiedimonte2078
    @robertopiedimonte2078 13 дней назад +2

    I believe it's for airborne forces cause can fit on CH47, but if I remember all correctly it come at 150k and to me army maintenance depot can directly apply all the kits on a standard ZR2 (why not a half priced base model for diesel or use Silverado new diesel with kits too, eventually swich the line for 4000 working diesel truck or Jeep Wrangler with Alfa Romeo 4 cylinder 2.2L 200hp 450Nm/332ft-lbs diesel engine we have on italian market which is much better on narrow road and mountain track) in a cheaper way 🤣🤣🤣
    Just to have an idea standard J-LAV come at 250k while armoured one you can get it at 500k, none of them would fit on the chopper, but...

  • @hawkeye200996
    @hawkeye200996 10 дней назад

    CH-47にこのサイズの車を積載できるの?!
    すごい!災害で離島に車を運べる!
    あらゆる状況で役に立つ筈

  • @lumber-jackha5123
    @lumber-jackha5123 13 дней назад +11

    Stryker vehicles are quieter than this.

  • @유희석-j6u
    @유희석-j6u 3 дня назад

    It is worthy.

  • @JSomerled
    @JSomerled 4 дня назад

    It never rains in combat

  • @johnmc6155
    @johnmc6155 6 дней назад

    I want to see this thing go up & down mud & rock covered hills.

  • @russiachinanorthkoreastatetv
    @russiachinanorthkoreastatetv 8 дней назад

    When i was in afghan in 2009-2010 we werent allowed to leave the base unless we had up armored mraps or matvs … we couldnt even take up armored humvess … & now these guys are going back to the GI Joe John Wayne Days with the open doors 😂

  • @coryhenson5059
    @coryhenson5059 11 дней назад +2

    In what war do we need no protection for troops?

  • @GunstockBayA90
    @GunstockBayA90 8 дней назад

    Complain to the SAS with their Pink Panther success since WW2. Our Growler was cool too for recondo. But seriously airspace will be clear when these are used

  • @Dano12345100
    @Dano12345100 6 дней назад

    So are the soldiers in the field going to be welding field expedient armor on during the next war?

  • @damongraham1398
    @damongraham1398 13 дней назад +1

    I would like to see one of these strapped to something like the Bell V-280 Valor.

  • @joshuamontgomery4992
    @joshuamontgomery4992 6 дней назад

    Weird how things change

  • @painfulorwhat8872
    @painfulorwhat8872 11 дней назад +6

    None of those troops are carrying packs, even very small ones. I doubt you’d get anywhere near 9 fully equipped guys in there.

  • @大善-k9y
    @大善-k9y 14 дней назад +10

    極限まで要らない部分をそぎ落とした無骨な車体、嫌いじゃ無いです
    (チヌークにも収まってしまうのは凄いです)
    0:06 しかし4WDなのに後輪だけホイールスピン・・・どうやってるんだ?

    • @ProductofNZ
      @ProductofNZ 13 дней назад +4

      Selectable 4WD. You can choose to drive in different modes. The most fuel efficient is only the rear wheels receiving power.

    • @ファントムドライ
      @ファントムドライ 13 дней назад +2

      @@ProductofNZ 日本の4WDにも普通にあるな。ぶっちゃけ軽トラにすらあるw

    • @ミノアプレビアス
      @ミノアプレビアス 12 дней назад

      フルタイム4WDって全ての車軸にデフロスターが着いてしまうのです。
      デフがついてないと曲がれないから。
      対してクロカン車はパートタイム4WDと言って、センターデフが着いていません。
      余計な機構が付いていないので頑丈です。
      その代わりに曲がれなくなるので舗装路走行時は2WDに切り替えます。

  • @mongolikechewchew2475
    @mongolikechewchew2475 4 дня назад

    Zero side armor or anything and no roof either. I'd say improve on the Humvee chassis and make upgrades with modern equipment and armor. These things can't protect our most valuable asset, PERSONNEL!

  • @WestCoast2025News
    @WestCoast2025News 2 дня назад

    Don't Forget The Kevlar Ballistic Canopy And The Multi 1200 Lumins Flashlights And Velcro Suits

  • @SecretSquirrel-et6dl
    @SecretSquirrel-et6dl 6 дней назад +2

    Why aren’t we just buying Toyota hilux and land cruisers and forgetting it at this level of vehicle…?

  • @atracamoniusvlogs
    @atracamoniusvlogs 7 дней назад +1

    Isv m1301 in chapo base

  • @ชายไร้จัย
    @ชายไร้จัย 13 дней назад

    โดนซุ่มโจมตี เข้าป้าทุกนัด แบบนี้ รอดยาก

  • @rich1958
    @rich1958 4 дня назад +1

    I hope it doesn’t rain.

  • @rgodon7552
    @rgodon7552 6 дней назад

    Looks like the ideal vehicle for urban combat…….

  • @lumber-jackha5123
    @lumber-jackha5123 13 дней назад +50

    No fricking way absolutely no protection at all. We tested two of these in Germany and one end up being a supply vehicle and the other the Command Sergeants Majors vehicle for V Corps. They are junk, gas hogs and hard to maintained for a combatant vehicle

    • @JohnComeOnMan
      @JohnComeOnMan 13 дней назад +12

      Interesting claim that a diesel is a gas hog

    • @gforce03XX
      @gforce03XX 13 дней назад +4

      No worries these will be for the Draftees in WW3 😂

    • @Eon2000
      @Eon2000 13 дней назад +9

      It's just a commercial truck with a modern diesel 2.8L I4 engine, how the hell could it be a fuel hog?

    • @lumber-jackha5123
      @lumber-jackha5123 13 дней назад +7

      @ okay they have since changed the engine but still this is not a vehicle that should be used in combat unless of course your special forces and that does not include airborne units. Big Army and TACOM has figured out that Airborne units shouldn’t and wouldn’t get these vehicles either, the logistics for them is just not there.

    • @lumber-jackha5123
      @lumber-jackha5123 13 дней назад +4

      @ Good one just a gimmick to sell it to the new recruits.

  • @jg2072
    @jg2072 13 дней назад +24

    Typically stupid idea. No protection and not even a way to stay warm in winter. Driving at any speed in colder weather would be incredibly unpleasant unless you are bundled up so much you can't move. They will need to issue lap blankets to the troops riding in it.

    • @frank-ko6de
      @frank-ko6de 13 дней назад +2

      It's for very short distance transport of infantry units. What nonsense are you even talking about, you nonsense....???? What about in climates where it gets very warm , like the jungles of the South Pacific, for which it's designed for.....?????

    • @jg2072
      @jg2072 13 дней назад +7

      @@frank-ko6de Very short distances? That's called marching.

    • @brokenwrench404
      @brokenwrench404 13 дней назад +3

      @@frank-ko6de do they pay you by the word of for each comment? You’re in a few comments defending this pos

    • @DruidTimer
      @DruidTimer 13 дней назад +3

      Ask just about any soldier if they would prefer to force march 20km with 50 kg on their back, or ride in a pickup truck to get there. The vehicle is designed for that, to get light infantry and their gear to places fast, not to fight from.

    • @frank-ko6de
      @frank-ko6de 13 дней назад

      @@brokenwrench404 its always the people sitting on their backside instead doing actual fighting talking the most nonsense. That day will never change, you ridiculous clueless nonsense.

  • @stephenbarry8425
    @stephenbarry8425 9 дней назад

    What was wrong with keeping the original Humv? It was in service and light weight before up armored? It was a replacement for the jeep.

  • @lauchlanguddy1004
    @lauchlanguddy1004 3 дня назад +1

    Drones are going to eat these.

  • @markkuranin9919
    @markkuranin9919 13 дней назад +2

    Winter and snow conditions?

  • @lizzardwizard2000
    @lizzardwizard2000 7 дней назад

    Basically a large golf cart.

  • @tomc5803
    @tomc5803 6 дней назад

    I hope they are 4 wheel drive!! The one they just showed in this video wasn't doing very well in 2 wheel drive mode, and he was on level ground!!!

  • @edwardcfinklein198
    @edwardcfinklein198 11 дней назад +1

    If the vehicle flips someone is gonna be Oh so screwed.

    • @John_Redcorn_
      @John_Redcorn_ 10 дней назад

      How so? It has a full roll cage and seat belts.

  • @garybythesea
    @garybythesea 12 дней назад +6

    Rare to see 99% commenters criticising a US military vehicle. I hope it is not expensive, otherwise a reasonable US civilian truck without panels probably can do the job.

  • @eyeofthestorm_74
    @eyeofthestorm_74 5 дней назад

    It looks like it's well protected from IEDs .

  • @youdhagarnacharry4026
    @youdhagarnacharry4026 11 дней назад

    field taxi! good for air transport only or modified some armour later.

  • @Robert-qi6mb
    @Robert-qi6mb 10 дней назад +3

    Looks a great vehicle don't mess with the USA military.

  • @scottjohnson9225
    @scottjohnson9225 7 дней назад

    The guy in the back carries the 12 gauge for drone protection.

  • @qinarizonaful
    @qinarizonaful 8 дней назад

    I vote Ripsaws with light armor instead, a centerline ball turret gunner first row back with Quad mount 20mm/shotgun drone killer, and seating for 6 with shooting ports on removable side panels. 2 Fit a squad, plus ride alongs, mission configured, some protection, better terrain navigation, faster and the ball turret can "mow grass" when SHTF!!! 🎉😂🎉❤

    • @lauchlanguddy1004
      @lauchlanguddy1004 3 дня назад

      Big drones fly so high you dont even see them and carry a big payload

  • @stunick1573
    @stunick1573 13 дней назад +6

    You'll either freeze your butts off in cold, get wet beyond belief in rain or become a giant dust ball on any back roads. No protection, all aluminum, only side shooters, no air guards. What exactly is this thing but a cheap transport sold at four times the cost. Infantry squads are 9 to 11 guys, no squad is ever fully manned. 9 seats each but with interpreter you need 10 seats you'll have to leave guys back or take two trucks per squad. Thats two air guards, two drivers, two TC's and one interpreter. No one ever trains with an interpreter but you'll have one per squad any time you leave the wire in real war zones. In any combat zone you will have air guards that's a must for vehicles anywhere. Trail vehicles eat shit tons of dust. These things will need doors and tops with Ac or heat. No one will want to ride in them in winter. Looking at you 10th MTN. Chosin!

  • @Raider-Multicam
    @Raider-Multicam 12 дней назад

    AMS need this

  • @SteveJones-om6ks
    @SteveJones-om6ks 13 дней назад +1

    I imagine it’s easier on the paperwork and organisation if you lose troops in convenient squad groups. Seems no other function for this vehicle.

  • @gazza9463
    @gazza9463 12 дней назад +1

    Why did they not fit a full windscreen with wiper blades and screen wash?

    • @ПавелБогачев-б1з
      @ПавелБогачев-б1з 6 дней назад

      Потому что "солдат должен стойко переносит трудности связанные со службой"

  • @mike8251
    @mike8251 13 дней назад +3

    Just need the gun turret and you have a halo warthog

  • @richardhake4098
    @richardhake4098 6 дней назад

    Have we forgotten about IED’s?

  • @danm1640
    @danm1640 10 дней назад

    Kinda seems like a step backwards considering the lack of armor. I expected to see them driving it at higher speeds like an offroad trophy truck. Speed would probably be this vehicles best defense. Hope it has some level of mine and ied protection underneath. Seems like it would be something special forces would use, but driving much faster.

  • @SHTFHunter
    @SHTFHunter 7 дней назад

    It may get used in a non-combat environment but never in war zone.

    • @richarda996
      @richarda996 7 дней назад

      Troops trend to use what is available.

    • @SHTFHunter
      @SHTFHunter 7 дней назад

      @richarda996 in war zone they use whatever is bullet proof. I've been there a few times.

  • @dustbunnieassassin3525
    @dustbunnieassassin3525 9 дней назад

    I believe they should stay in the realms of the LAVs or build off the body instead of vehicles that will sit in the motorpool for months on end.

  • @楊-f4e
    @楊-f4e 5 дней назад

    直接把民用越野車車體為基礎發展出軍用野戰車!

  • @robertbenson9797
    @robertbenson9797 9 дней назад

    Can you mount a “ Ma Deuce” on it?

  • @HidariMagari14cm
    @HidariMagari14cm 12 дней назад +2

    これランセットとか徘徊してる戦場じゃ、そのままで使えないだろうね。
    結局網とか籠付けないと危険で走行出来ないと思うわ。

  • @alphonsealfred7337
    @alphonsealfred7337 10 дней назад +1

    special desert vehicle