A little thought for the 1910-20's riders, that were doing 2000 more kms than today, on 18 kgs single-geared bikes they had to repair themselves in case of a mechanical issue.
@@welovestats1it may be at a higher speed now however, taking into consideration that in the oldest days weren’t any soft surfaces road, 90% of the roads were dirt and gravel. Also, you didn’t have 200 people helping the riders, the average weight of a bicycle was around 22-25 lbs and finally the average km for the entire race was above 5500km and now is hardly 3900kms.
@@CamiloCanonB yes, and despite all the wrong he did, he was unbelievable on those climbs and he always hugely respected his rivals. The rest is garbage. Lance was an incredible athlete.
Oh yeah. It was the time I started watching it and they always won. I loved Wiggins but I hated Froome. Thomas and Bernal were ok but nothing more to me. Didn’t like the team back then
El tachado ganó 7 tour , lo premiaron y nunca dió positivo, no lo han despojado y no se los dieron a otro, un excepcional deportista, legalmente el mejor, así digan que no, si nunca lo detectaron pues es el campeón
@@vettelprimemangelemonde7006 Perso, j'ai arrêter de regarder depuis des années, je regarde vite fait les résumés! S'il n'y a plus de spectateur, alors peut-être qu'il y aura du changement
@@Stefan_W. He was cheating more than others, but he's not the only one "villanized"- guys who finished 2nd or 3rd behind him are also considered dirty and never got promoted to winners, like Oscar Perreiro and Andy Schleck were declared winners after Landis and Contador scandals
Concordo, inclusive, muitos daquela época, depois de terem parado, ou confirmaram ou ainda em fim de carreira foram pegos no doping. Lance só liderou a coisa toda mas não idealizou aquele tipo de doping.
@@Stefan_W. Non il a été le seul à dire la vérité, et on l'a puni pour avoir été enfin honnête; Mais les coureurs actuels font mieux que lui sans se doper??? Ah bon tout va bien alors... En athlétisme l'américaine a fait 9 ans de compétitions en gagnant tous les titres sur 100 m et 200 m sans jamais être inquiétée. Et c'est finalement elle qui a avoué qu'elle se dopait à mort, et pourtant rien n'a jamais été mis en lumière par les instances de contrôle. Lance a fait tous ses tours en étant dopés sans jamais être inquiété. Vous pensez réellement que les coureurs actuels risquent quelque chose au niveau des contrôle mdr...
It would be interesting to see the total ascent in addition to the total distance of each Tour. Perhaps the routes got shorter but harder due to more climbs.
Lance !! El grande👑Niño borrará la historia!! Nadie por la época tenía ese físico y metabolismo como el!! Así de fácil dopado y sin dopar que quede claro, ni nadie iba ser lo que hizo! Pocos monstruos del ciclismo hay y les aseguro que aparecerán más a ver de qué los acusan ahora, convenencieros!!!
Also ask Greg lemond. Armstrong was a shitty human being that had no issue destroying other people's lives. All dope head stuck but Armstrong is particular kind of c#%t.
@@schmuwabu Landis did win, he was the one on the podium celebrating winning the tour by a minute, he was disqualified a month later. Its a very bad practice to deny the reality of something, Landis was the cyclist who won on the road, Pereiro won by a technicality a month after the tour had finished, thats NOT a real win for Pereiro who was also doped up. Cycling results are rife with hypocrisy especially today, its best to avoid that and include all the information. For this video why include Lances pictures for 7 tours but ignore Landis? can you see its hypocrisy.
@@cattycats4 No it's no hipocrisy. Landis got disqualified and Pereiro got the win. Armstrong got disqualified and no one got the win. That's the only reason, stop seeing a conspiracy in everything. There is no factuality in including someone who factually didn't win, accept that and be quiet
@@schmuwabu If you watched the tour as it happened and you saw who was celebrating winning the tour de france that year who was it? Landis. Nobody else. Thats factual. Anything else is a denial of reality. Landis won and then AFTER a month he was disqualified, he was a rightful winner for 1 month and no amount of reality deniers will change that. If Felipe Massa won his court case and was granted the 2008 F1 championship would you be someone who would refuse to believe that Hamilton ever won it even though its been fact for 16 years? It would be the same thing.
@@cattycats4 Bro can you read?What is the title of the Video? "Tour de France winners" and not "Tour de France winners on the podium" or Tour de France winners for one month". So Landis has nothing to do with this video and is not the rightful rider to be featured in the video. Can you get that in your little brain?
Did all cycles checked the same rule and condition, that cycles blood containts epo, ppl or others dopings incl quantities in ppm. Where the 2nd place during lance 7time champion...there are should be the winner..
The Lance Armstrong removal is a bunch of crud. He passed the drug tests and should have been left alone. Only reason he got in trouble is because France got but hurt over their drug test failure.
Wiggins is Belgian and Froome is Kenyan (the first and only African to win so far) and she be denoted as such. There has only been one British rider to have won the Tour.
Funny thing about Armstrong.... EVERY rider at that level, before him AND after, doped as much as they could get away with. His victories ARE still victories.
Funny thing is that he said it wasn't about how many wins before his 5th, then when he crossed the line he held up five fingers just to remind everyone how many. If someone puts a jet powered engine on their cycle and wins tour de france but gets disqualified for using an engine, according to your logic it's still a victory.
Armstrong was a cheater, alongside those who finished 2nd and 3rd. That's why there is No Winner. Unlike 2006 and 2010, Oscar Perreiro and Andy Schleck (originally the runner-ups) won only after Landis and Contador were disqualified.
@@framar601 i dont think all of them, but between 1991 and 2005 for sure all winners used EPO or blood transfusion. probably some after that also. Wiggins, all 4 Froome wins i think were mechanical doping. i dont think the last years winners used doping, tho Ketones help a lot but they arent forbidden.
Lance was and is a cheater, liar, and in the end an embarrassment to the honest riders in the usa. He let us all down and so did the guys that cheated with him.
Do you even realize that using performance enhancement drugs are used in every sport? So why being a cry baby about armstrong doping? He just beat all other guys that are using the same drugs as he did
A little thought for the 1910-20's riders, that were doing 2000 more kms than today, on 18 kgs single-geared bikes they had to repair themselves in case of a mechanical issue.
Interesting point. Btw. The average speed of cyclists in the early years of the Tour de France was 25km/h, and now it's 40 km/h.
They were also cheating the most probably. By shortcuts mostly.
@@fangru7294 amphetamines, many died from overdoing it
Imagine 5700km within a month 😢
@@welovestats1it may be at a higher speed now however, taking into consideration that in the oldest days weren’t any soft surfaces road, 90% of the roads were dirt and gravel. Also, you didn’t have 200 people helping the riders, the average weight of a bicycle was around 22-25 lbs and finally the average km for the entire race was above 5500km and now is hardly 3900kms.
That guy No-Winner really dominated the sport
@@CamiloCanonB yes, and despite all the wrong he did, he was unbelievable on those climbs and he always hugely respected his rivals. The rest is garbage. Lance was an incredible athlete.
@@giovannitocco i think he was joking, "No-winner" it's not only armstrong, he was probably joking, and no, armstrong is not a incredible athlete.
Man. I still have nightmares thanks to SKY 2012-2018.
2019 too, same team just different title sponsor
Oh yeah. It was the time I started watching it and they always won. I loved Wiggins but I hated Froome. Thomas and Bernal were ok but nothing more to me. Didn’t like the team back then
Rominger, Zulle and Roglic. Best 3 riders i've seen without a Tour.
poulidor ?
@@Heyliganon But i didn't see him
@@guillermopico9190But he was the best. Still holds the record für most Tour de France podiums, yet not even a yellow jersey for him
Agree, I would add Claudio Chiappucci as not only one of the bests without a Tour de France, but also the best without any Grand Tours.
Nairo quintana, won both giro and vuelta and made the tour podium a couple of times
in 1936... mostly no asphalt... 31km/h avarage speed... amazing
Lucien Petit Breton,
Idole
De ma jeunesse ❤❤❤
El tachado ganó 7 tour , lo premiaron y nunca dió positivo, no lo han despojado y no se los dieron a otro, un excepcional deportista, legalmente el mejor, así digan que no, si nunca lo detectaron pues es el campeón
Quando è apparso Pantani mi è scesa una lacrimuccia, il PIRATA per sempre nei nostri cuori!
Stop being so naive; they doped both before and after Lance.
Eddy Merckx is the biggest cheaters.
Merckx never tested positive in any of the 525 races he won
@@smag3813 Neither did Lance.
@billmulkins3217
LOL because of corruption of UCI
Armstrong was the godfather of tour de france between 1999 to 2006.
@@billmulkins3217 dooping control were absolute joke with us postal and discovery channel teams
Lance was scapegoated! Everyone knows he won those racers
Van het begin tot het einde....ze zijn allemaal dope man!!
Azért tudod, mert te vagy a szállító?
@hegedustibor4787 je moet je vieze bek houden en je moeder heeft een snor!
Lans Armstrong is realy shampoin 7 th time, the best.
The best LENS ARMSTRONG😂
2024 clearly Pogi
cheater !
@@Koufou042Like all of the peloton
@@vettelprimemangelemonde7006 Et alors ? C'est une raison pour justifier et laisser faire ? Défaitiste !
@@Koufou042 Ils sont tous dopé et non faut pas laisser faire
@@vettelprimemangelemonde7006 Perso, j'ai arrêter de regarder depuis des années, je regarde vite fait les résumés! S'il n'y a plus de spectateur, alors peut-être qu'il y aura du changement
No clue why only Lances titles got deleted among other cheaters
They scapegoated him, they should be reinstated. His stage wins should be too
Lance gets villainized among all the other cheaters. What a joke.
@@Stefan_W. He was cheating more than others, but he's not the only one "villanized"- guys who finished 2nd or 3rd behind him are also considered dirty and never got promoted to winners, like Oscar Perreiro and Andy Schleck were declared winners after Landis and Contador scandals
All the cheaters are villainized. He was just the biggest cheater.
Concordo, inclusive, muitos daquela época, depois de terem parado, ou confirmaram ou ainda em fim de carreira foram pegos no doping.
Lance só liderou a coisa toda mas não idealizou aquele tipo de doping.
All the other cheaters didn't destroy other people's lives when they came out against him.
@@Stefan_W. Non il a été le seul à dire la vérité, et on l'a puni pour avoir été enfin honnête;
Mais les coureurs actuels font mieux que lui sans se doper??? Ah bon tout va bien alors...
En athlétisme l'américaine a fait 9 ans de compétitions en gagnant tous les titres sur 100 m et 200 m sans jamais être inquiétée. Et c'est finalement elle qui a avoué qu'elle se dopait à mort, et pourtant rien n'a jamais été mis en lumière par les instances de contrôle. Lance a fait tous ses tours en étant dopés sans jamais être inquiété. Vous pensez réellement que les coureurs actuels risquent quelque chose au niveau des contrôle mdr...
Agree 100% he was the only man to win seven times you can't erase history he was always a champion the only cyclist to win seven-time Tour de France 👍
He was caught not the others that's all.
He didnt win like a real man, a real sportsman. Just a cheat without honor.
These cyclists today are pushing the limits with their aerodynamic kit, good nutrition, altitude training, recovery techniques and ketones.
Les Grands Duels,
COPPI -, BARTALI,
MYTHIQUES,
PUIS,
BOBET,
ANQUETIL,
MERCKX,
OCANA, LUIS❤❤❤❤❤
THÉVENET,
BERNARD HINAULT ❤❤❤❤
It would be interesting to see the total ascent in addition to the total distance of each Tour. Perhaps the routes got shorter but harder due to more climbs.
1956 : Roger Walkowiak was in Nord-Est Centre team.
Lance is still the best amongst the dopers. We'll never forget that amazong run. Still my #GOAT
Кск это сделано? В какой программе,кто подскажет???? Спасибо
Lensa su namestili, toliki pre njega su kaznjavani zbog nedozvoljenig sredstava, pa ponovo se takmicili- Pentani., Urlich etc
No mention of Landis?
Landis got caught Lance did not
2010 Contador
やっぱインデュラインとエディメルクスえぐい
Si Pogacar gana como va, LANCE tiene que tener sus 7 Titulos de regreso
@@NAO-bq6ed . Eso, que quiten los controles anti doping y que pongan un iluminado como tú a decidir quien va limpio y quien no.
Pantani best
1968 that is not a picture of Jan Janssen..!
Lance !! El grande👑Niño borrará la historia!! Nadie por la época tenía ese físico y metabolismo como el!! Así de fácil dopado y sin dopar que quede claro, ni nadie iba ser lo que hizo! Pocos monstruos del ciclismo hay y les aseguro que aparecerán más a ver de qué los acusan ahora, convenencieros!!!
That’s not a picture of Jan Janssen. (1968)
indeed, big mistake here
Legal.
All of em riders are doped to the core. Why do you hate armstrong that much?
You should ask his team mates.
Also ask Greg lemond. Armstrong was a shitty human being that had no issue destroying other people's lives. All dope head stuck but Armstrong is particular kind of c#%t.
Pogacar es el ultimo winer 🎉🎉
Armstrong came first in those 7 tours.
Where is Landis? Be decent and announce who won on the road if you want to be factual. And shouldve included Lances times for comparison.
He did not win. He got banned after, therefore he didn't even participate officially
@@schmuwabu Landis did win, he was the one on the podium celebrating winning the tour by a minute, he was disqualified a month later. Its a very bad practice to deny the reality of something, Landis was the cyclist who won on the road, Pereiro won by a technicality a month after the tour had finished, thats NOT a real win for Pereiro who was also doped up. Cycling results are rife with hypocrisy especially today, its best to avoid that and include all the information. For this video why include Lances pictures for 7 tours but ignore Landis? can you see its hypocrisy.
@@cattycats4 No it's no hipocrisy. Landis got disqualified and Pereiro got the win. Armstrong got disqualified and no one got the win. That's the only reason, stop seeing a conspiracy in everything. There is no factuality in including someone who factually didn't win, accept that and be quiet
@@schmuwabu If you watched the tour as it happened and you saw who was celebrating winning the tour de france that year who was it? Landis. Nobody else. Thats factual. Anything else is a denial of reality. Landis won and then AFTER a month he was disqualified, he was a rightful winner for 1 month and no amount of reality deniers will change that. If Felipe Massa won his court case and was granted the 2008 F1 championship would you be someone who would refuse to believe that Hamilton ever won it even though its been fact for 16 years? It would be the same thing.
@@cattycats4 Bro can you read?What is the title of the Video? "Tour de France winners" and not "Tour de France winners on the podium" or Tour de France winners for one month". So Landis has nothing to do with this video and is not the rightful rider to be featured in the video. Can you get that in your little brain?
Lance won 7 times in my book and he never got caught but Alberto did and he is still on there
System was broken, Lance won those Tour on the road, the rest is just trash talking.
I cant understand why Lance Armstrong admitted he took epo.
It's all hear say
He never got caught
Did all cycles checked the same rule and condition, that cycles blood containts epo, ppl or others dopings incl quantities in ppm.
Where the 2nd place during lance 7time champion...there are should be the winner..
Al césar lo que es del césar y acavendish lo que es de Cavendish
2024 Pogačar and so many years after.
The Lance Armstrong removal is a bunch of crud. He passed the drug tests and should have been left alone. Only reason he got in trouble is because France got but hurt over their drug test failure.
2024
Tadej Pogačar✌️
Slovenia 🇸🇮
So wat if he didn't have cancer he had to enhancement because he was sick
Pogi takes the 2024 🎉
They look more and more than dead bodies and the organizers still think they're clean?
Wiggins is Belgian and Froome is Kenyan (the first and only African to win so far) and she be denoted as such. There has only been one British rider to have won the Tour.
He became British citizen that’s why so Wiggins
Beh ...Armstrong l unico a pagare?ma finiamola e cerchiamo di essere onesti
É come se nel Body Building squalificassero uno come Coleman.....👎👎👎
Los que quedaron de segundos deberían de ser los ganadores seria justo
seguro se dopaban tambien
Jonas and Tadej for next 5 years
Ремко так-то ещё может
They said you cheater then you are. They said you great you great. Who knows just like Covid.
Remember lance had cancer and win seven
Les tricheurs comme ruis devraient être bannis de cette vidéo
Лэнс бедняга. Зря пахал.
Lance is the best
The best at being a cheat
Que hipocrisia... Eddy Merchx tem quantos dopings mesmo...
Ridate i 7 tour ad Armstrong
Não se dopa uma mula para anda com um puro sangue, Lance Armstrong e o puro sangue .
98. What a joke. Special 2 is 96 😅
Funny thing about Armstrong....
EVERY rider at that level, before him AND after, doped as much as they could get away with. His victories ARE still victories.
So according to this logic also 2010 tour should have remained contador's
Even IF all doped, He still didnt win fair. So he got No title😊
Funny thing is that he said it wasn't about how many wins before his 5th, then when he crossed the line he held up five fingers just to remind everyone how many. If someone puts a jet powered engine on their cycle and wins tour de france but gets disqualified for using an engine, according to your logic it's still a victory.
No winner is the stupidest thing the UCI has ever done.
Man tours under 5000 km is for losers!
My man Lucien Buysse ! 5.745 km !
Lance el mejor, así les duela a los doble moral.
Lance Armstrong the best
lol
What a crap with lance
Winner was EPO haha
Armstrong was a cheater, alongside those who finished 2nd and 3rd. That's why there is No Winner.
Unlike 2006 and 2010, Oscar Perreiro and Andy Schleck (originally the runner-ups) won only after Landis and Contador were disqualified.
This is WRONG Lance Armstrong won 7 times.
Lance, The G.O.A.T.
Even Eddie failed drug tests. It’s a circus, let the best clown win!
J'ai jamais vu autant de dopés dans une seule vidéo!
2024 TADEJ POGACAR
Not 1 clean tour de france winner. Not 1. Thats pro sports tho isent it
Lance Armstrong win 7 times.
No, the king of cheating doesn't win, deal with it.
@@Thunderworks All of the winners on drugs as well, not just Armstrong. But keep living in denial.
@@framar601 i dont think all of them, but between 1991 and 2005 for sure all winners used EPO or blood transfusion. probably some after that also. Wiggins, all 4 Froome wins i think were mechanical doping. i dont think the last years winners used doping, tho Ketones help a lot but they arent forbidden.
@@framar601Prove it
@@joowstyProve it
Lance was and is a cheater, liar, and in the end an embarrassment to the honest riders in the usa. He let us all down and so did the guys that cheated with him.
Do you even realize that using performance enhancement drugs are used in every sport? So why being a cry baby about armstrong doping? He just beat all other guys that are using the same drugs as he did
You need to calm down, he's not worst than most at the time and even before his time and after his time
I think it's naive to believe that the other's didn't use doping.
Sva Lensova prva mesta dodeliti biciklistima koji su bili drugi na trci te godine!!!
Armstrong-💉💊
Amstrong = 💩