@@alexbayer2365 черная книга неплоха, но атомик харт это просто смешно. Линейная, идиотская и там еще немец глупый, если помнишь. Ну потому что все немцы глупые и вообще все глупые. А русский человек - он святой, всем назло. Он от древних Ариев вперемешку с валирийцами. До того, как стал киев, русы летали на Драконах, строили сказочные города, торговали с Атлантами и громили ящеров. Вот.
ты хотел сказать достойная попытка выкатить интерактивный тур по Руси за жалкие 5 миллионов баксов. условные юбисофт на свои "интерактивные туры" тратят в 100 раз больше так то))
Witcher 3 had a budget of 32$ million and Smuta had only 1/3 of that, 11$ million. I had no chance of trying russian Smuta but i can clearly see Smuta is nowhere near Witcher. Who knows maybe russian gamers will love it and can cover wasted 11 million investments, but I highly doubt.
It's not just a matter of budget, also of people working on it. Smuta was just done the kolkhoz way - "piece is piece, now give us the cash and go f yourselves".
By the way horses do react when you use signs. Which's accurate to the lore cause most animals can't stand magic, ghosts and monsters. Mages can not cast while mounted (unless a horse is heavily sedated which makes it useless). Such a thing can happen only in Warhammer fantasy. In the witcher you have Sodden.
There are tones of indie games and projects with much lower budget than smuta that are much better than smuta So game is not an issue There are moments in smuta that doesnt need high budget but still crap, like voice acting, game dedign, etc So people who try to defend crap talking about money, dont do that But in defence of siberia nova i can say that those dudes have 0 experience in game development They dont know how to create certain game mechanics and use certain technologies at full level but still in short time they managed to create something at least somehow playable and functioning So if Russian government really wants to revive game development in Russia, they have to invest more money to invite people from abroad with game developing experience and teach, train more people on game development and newer technologies But it demands a lot of investment and i dont think that old dudes in administration are ready to spend money on gaming industry
Вот что бывает когба государство, которое умеет в основном пилить бюджет, пытается вложиться во что то, в чем даже не разобравшись, что бы и мелкие компании пилили)))
FYI its 81$ million (probably even more with all those DLCs and upgrades over years ) game vs 5$ million game not to mention its 2022-2023 version not from 2015...
There are tones of indie games and projects with much lower budget than smuta that are much better than smuta So game is not an issue There are moments in smuta that doesnt need high budget but still crap, like voice acting, game dedign, etc So people who try to defend crap talking about money, dont do that
Witcher 3 was developed by a larger game company so it's obvious to be better than the other one, but that doesn't mean the other game isn't worth a try, nice comparison
by a larger game company you mean cd project red whos first game was witcher 1 and they only made 3 game 4 including gwent when witcher 3 launched and now add cyber punk 2077 , how much did you drink when you said they are a larger game company . their first game witcher 1 was a masterpice in its own right. this other game wether its a good try or not dosent matter as long you compare it to tw3 and cdproject red.
@@aharnishrofl First witcher was NOT a masterpiece. I was okay because of the setting. The gameplay was from 16th century, and the graphics from 2000 (which is fair I guess))
Ue5 хороший движок Все дело в умении и таланте Не в бюджете, не в движке и даже не в численности разработчиков Суть в том, что студия создавщая смуту не имеет опыта в создании игр, они сами не знают как реализовать те или иные механики, анимации и тд
@@ruslanmamedaliyev3912 Я имею ввиду, что в Смуте из ассетов процентов 85 взято из ассет-стора, то есть Смута это по большей части технодемка движка а не игра))
Why would you say 2015 and then show a next gen version?
Next gen version isn't really any greatly better
what is also interesting about witcher textures - they're look unique, and not like generic ones from megascans library
SMUTA adekwatny tytuł dla tego projektu
znaczy cos innego, ale nadal jest gownem jak prawie wszystko co oni produkuja nowadays.
@@senior_comrade8401 there’s a lot good Russians games. Like Atomic Heart, Black Book.
@@alexbayer2365 черная книга неплоха, но атомик харт это просто смешно. Линейная, идиотская и там еще немец глупый, если помнишь. Ну потому что все немцы глупые и вообще все глупые. А русский человек - он святой, всем назло. Он от древних Ариев вперемешку с валирийцами. До того, как стал киев, русы летали на Драконах, строили сказочные города, торговали с Атлантами и громили ящеров. Вот.
@@alexbayer2365Only Atomic Heart, the rest is just in limbo xd
Smuta is just propaganda shit, like movie 1612... just lacking unicorns and ghosts, a huge bugfest to boot.
Смута - это жалкий провал. Ведьмак - легенда, причём все части.
ты хотел сказать достойная попытка выкатить интерактивный тур по Руси за жалкие 5 миллионов баксов. условные юбисофт на свои "интерактивные туры" тратят в 100 раз больше так то))
@@MrVoland44 🤡
@@MrVoland44 во всем виноват климат. ̶и̶ ̶е̶в̶р̶е̶и̶
@@MrVoland44 за десять миллионов. И да, в Ассасине в разв лучше геймлей.
,,Machasz was szablą jak cepem" M. Wołodyjowski. To porównanie to taki żarcik klikbajtowy.
People really compare smuta with witcher 3?
Well, if the developers themselves tried to say that this is a "Witcher killer", of course people will compare this Witcher and "this craft"
Witcher 3 had a budget of 32$ million and Smuta had only 1/3 of that, 11$ million. I had no chance of trying russian Smuta but i can clearly see Smuta is nowhere near Witcher.
Who knows maybe russian gamers will love it and can cover wasted 11 million investments, but I highly doubt.
As a russian gamer I can tell you most of us agree that this game is dogshit
6-7mln$*
It's not just a matter of budget, also of people working on it. Smuta was just done the kolkhoz way - "piece is piece, now give us the cash and go f yourselves".
Compare it to witcher 1 and it would still loose 😂😂😂
СМУТА It's Soviet crap, you can't compare it to The Witcher 3, man
Smuta to 2nd best Witcher3 in the world ;)
By the way horses do react when you use signs.
Which's accurate to the lore cause most animals can't stand magic, ghosts and monsters.
Mages can not cast while mounted (unless a horse is heavily sedated which makes it useless).
Such a thing can happen only in Warhammer fantasy. In the witcher you have Sodden.
There are tones of indie games and projects with much lower budget than smuta that are much better than smuta
So game is not an issue
There are moments in smuta that doesnt need high budget but still crap, like voice acting, game dedign, etc
So people who try to defend crap talking about money, dont do that
But in defence of siberia nova i can say that those dudes have 0 experience in game development
They dont know how to create certain game mechanics and use certain technologies at full level but still in short time they managed to create something at least somehow playable and functioning
So if Russian government really wants to revive game development in Russia, they have to invest more money to invite people from abroad with game developing experience and teach, train more people on game development and newer technologies
But it demands a lot of investment and i dont think that old dudes in administration are ready to spend money on gaming industry
In this comparison Smuta took a high second place. Maybe they should throw RDR2 into the competition?
Расия - великая страна! пишу из космоса.
Арракис наш! Спайс наш!
Better play Asssasins than this. My Russian opinion. It’s just a trash
АХАХА КАКОЙ ПОЗОР. Вот что получается когда доверяешь разработку игры бате Фирамира
Вот что бывает когба государство, которое умеет в основном пилить бюджет, пытается вложиться во что то, в чем даже не разобравшись, что бы и мелкие компании пилили)))
Wtf theres invisible wall near that river. Really in 2024, in rpg game.
FYI its 81$ million (probably even more with all those DLCs and upgrades over years ) game vs 5$ million game
not to mention its 2022-2023 version not from 2015...
10 millions. And the problem is not about the money
There are tones of indie games and projects with much lower budget than smuta that are much better than smuta
So game is not an issue
There are moments in smuta that doesnt need high budget but still crap, like voice acting, game dedign, etc
So people who try to defend crap talking about money, dont do that
@@ruslanmamedaliyev3912not saying you arent wrong, but give examples of similar games with similar budget at least
liberal democracy vs authoritarian putinism
🤡
liberal democracy? Poland? Come on now.
@@cactuslietuva why not? Poland is a democracy. We had a government change literally 7 months ago
@cactuslietuva yeah, because Poland is famous for its long lasting dictator? Ah yeah, no, they keep changing presidents like any democracy does
Its rather social-democracy then liberal
Гойдаааа!!!
capture it in higher fps next time
Witcher 3 was developed by a larger game company so it's obvious to be better than the other one, but that doesn't mean the other game isn't worth a try, nice comparison
Witcher 3 is almost 10 year old
by a larger game company you mean cd project red whos first game was witcher 1 and they only made 3 game 4 including gwent when witcher 3 launched and now add cyber punk 2077 , how much did you drink when you said they are a larger game company . their first game witcher 1 was a masterpice in its own right. this other game wether its a good try or not dosent matter as long you compare it to tw3 and cdproject red.
@@aharnishrofl First witcher was NOT a masterpiece. I was okay because of the setting. The gameplay was from 16th century, and the graphics from 2000 (which is fair I guess))
@@dreamwalkerzmm isnt that the point i am making?
Second project had a full size developer team, support from government, and 5 mln$ budget. I can’t any reason not to say that’s fucked.
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Ты сравниваешь движок Ведьмака с UE5
Ue5 хороший движок
Все дело в умении и таланте
Не в бюджете, не в движке и даже не в численности разработчиков
Суть в том, что студия создавщая смуту не имеет опыта в создании игр, они сами не знают как реализовать те или иные механики, анимации и тд
@@ruslanmamedaliyev3912 Я имею ввиду, что в Смуте из ассетов процентов 85 взято из ассет-стора, то есть Смута это по большей части технодемка движка а не игра))
witcher still looks better 😂