Time for the other 19 clubs to sanction MC. Refuse to honour fixtures against them until they fully cooperate with the investigations. If found guilty, every club affected by them in loss of earnings over the last 10yrs should sue them for billions......
@@d3po607 loool what do you mean worth 20-50 mil. what, you adding up everyones TV bill as well? cause there is no way you think 1 club makes 50 million pounds for one match. thats easily an average of a billion pounds a year, nearly all teams would be hugely profitable with that kinda revenue. also the big clubs in the prem would be worth much more when they'd be making about 1.5 billion a year just on matches alone.
Out of his depth? More like drowning! He wasn't asked to pre judge anything, Jim just asked him what the punishment might be. What are the EPL rules with regard to the alleged breaking of said rules? He either doesn't know or the EPL will only decide what penalties will apply if City are guilty. They seem to be reacting "on the fly".
@@petermainwaringsxthey make the punishments up. PL wanted to punish Everton with 10 points in the first charge, the independent board said that was absolute nonsense, they have no idea what they are doing.
He's in Mansour's pocket, more like. The PL would be shooting itself in the foot if it chooses to expel the most successful club in England of the last decade. However, something must be done as this is now a make-or-break moment for the reputation of the FA and PL regarding how much control they have over their own sport.
OMG what a load of politicing. Ask him why the NHL, NFL, CFL MLB NBA and almost any other league, can complete investigations in a fraction of the time and the Premier league can't?
Man City have been accused of civil fraud, as part of 115 charges. Give me an example of where that’s happened with a US team and it’s been wrapped up immediately…
Premier really good shape some clubs get a pass like united for spending Chelsea can spent well over a billion in just over a year free pass city have 115 charges and still winning leagues Everton and forest punished straight away fantastic running g of the league 👏👏👏hats off
The problem for the PL with FFP, Man City Richard is the rules were all over the place. The fact charges are over a 10 year plus time period implies the PL were incompetent, clueless in managing a fair, consistent, reactive system. City lawyers will run rings around the PL.
I wonder what the Premier League management will tell us if something has been overlooked for 15 years at a club that happens to win 6 out of 7 league titles. Why weren't they warned the year they should have been? Why do they want to punish ManCity now, when they already generate the most income for themselves? Why now?Why does this whole story reek of rival club interests? JimWilson, I think you've raised some good questions, but I'd add a couple.
Five and a half years and he still couldn't run a bath! The PL 'fleeces' the fans by selling TV rights to companies when then call the tune! Games played on Friday nights, Saturday lunchtimes, Saturday evenings, Sunday lunchtimes, Sunday evenings etc, etc. all takes no account of fans commitments, or travelling., eg Newcastle at Arsenal on a Monday night! The majority of PL games don't get played on Saturday at 3pm anymore! and as for 'an independent panel, independently selected',..........by who Mr Masters? Tell us!
103 of the charges are technical phony charges brought by PL because the big charges are wrong or hard to prove. The most/only significant charge is that the sponsorship from Etihad Airlines was inflated. History has proven that completely wrong. The enormous success of Man City and Citygroup around the world have given Etihad Airlines exceptional value back. Related to the sponsorship is possibly charges that Man City cooked the books, that is the owners paid part of the supposed sponsorship. This is highly unlikely because Man City's accounts were scrutinized thoroughly by their revision bureaus.
@joolsson1 • 54 charges of Failure to provide accurate financial information 2009-10 to 2017-18. • 14 charges of Failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments from 2009-10 to 2017-18. • 5 charges of Failure to comply with Uefa's rules including Financial Fair Play (FFP) 2013-14 to 2017-18. • 7 charges of Breaching Premier League's PSR rules 2015-16 to 2017-18. • 35 charges of Failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations December 2018 - Feb 2023.
@@dstewusa7054 A similar detailed investigation of all/most other PL-clubs going back to 2009 would probably have resulted in very many phony charges type: Failure to provide accurate financial information, Failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments, and Failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations.
@@dstewusa7054 so the main point is the " 7 charges of Breaching Premier League's PSR rules 2015-16 to 2017-18" bc if they can't prove MC guilty in those charges, all other charges is going to go down the drain. How can you charge them failure to provide/co-operated if you can't find guilty in their book?
Why no questions about the ridiculous PSR rules which is only keeping the top clubs at the top? No one can break in and stay there regularly now. Time for a change.
It's difficult when you can't beat someone on the football field, because of that the club interests of other teams come to the fore. Why are you not so concerned with the new ManUnited scandal, in which they received discounts from the Premier League to avoid punishment that 19 other clubs did not? Yes, fair play, interesting interpretation... The whole thing is starting to become a little unreliable, because you can see what it is about. It doesn't matter which team breaks the rules, but which clubs the league represents. We will be able to watch Serie A, because the Premier League is already more corrupt than La Liga, and that is not easy to say.
Convince myself? Because isn't that what's happening now? I understand that there are popular and unpopular teams, but that could be put aside for a moment. If something doesn't make sense to you, you've missed the point. @@kazeemolarewaju9395
Tbf, the guy is the CEO, he's not a legal professional and will probably play no part in this hearing or even have anything to do with the rules the PL enforce. People greatly overestimate a CEO's involvement in a business's operations. A CEO is a yes/no man. He gets things put on his desk, and he says "will this make us money?" His directors say "yes" and he signs off on it. That being said, he is the face of the business, and should be open and transparent about matters.
@@davidtaylor6793 Because like I said... he's a CEO and he literally listens to what his advisors say. Trust me I'm not on Man City's side, Im a Liverpool fan, so anything but, what I'm saying is the CEO doesn't run a company. A CEO for a multi-million pound company does not run that company. The managers and directors do. The sales staff do, the marketing managers do, they are the people responsible for how a company is run. The CEO and the owners do not run a company. Take Man Utd for example, all the fans are blaming the owners, but its not their fault, they've pumped all the money in for the last 10 years, it's the director of football, the team manager, and the players that have let them down.
If it's a guilty verdict the titles have to be stripped, it's the only appropriate punishment, they cheated for multiple seasons so they should be punished for multiple seasons, a relegation or points deduction will only affect them for one season, especially as they are a state-backed club. They'll just learn from their mistakes and do their cheating more covertly so hackers can't get to it
Not good enough. It’s our sport mate, not yours, or the premier league’s or Man City’s. The length of time it’s taking and the secrecy are a disgrace. If City are found guilty, the last decade of the prem goes down the toilet, and no punishment on City will fix that. This should have been sorted years ago, and we’re now starting another season where the competition is totally compromised in the eyes of the world.
The EPL charges against MC relate to a very long period, up to 12 seasons. The EPL rules changed over those periods, so the basis for acceptable and unacceptable financial activities will change from season to season. The system was therefore inconsistent and arbitrary. It should be relatively easy then for the MC lawyers to raise sufficient doubt in the panel's mind as to whether there was a deliberate purposeful and consistent pattern of MC abusing the financial regulations. Doubtless the panel will take ages to review all this and then find some minor grievances and fine MC accordingly, maybe throw in a suspended points deduction and a recommendation for the EPL to adopt new financial regulations closer to the UEFA FFP. Reply
@@brianshockledge3241 do you even know the 115 charges, have you actually read the mails and the evidence. do you know what it is they did. it doesn't sound likt you do.
@@Redballoon99 I have actually seen the charges it looks like a child has cobbled them together whereas you clearly haven`t you`re just going off the red media propaganda. I`m afraid you are going to be very disappointed.
He's from a cricket background and he knows nothing ...England were well managed ... Mike basset could have won the euros with that squad.. He was quick enough to put time limits on Evertons and forest charges ... independent panels he picked Evertons first panel and asked for 12 points ..how isn't he inputting what points he wants city to have ... It's master job to stop teams outside the sly six not succeeding ... Teams trying to build teams and stadiums to compete or even stay in the league are getting punished but yet the favourites can spend and do what they want ..
So the premier league bring charges against various clubs and then hand it over to an independent panel and lawyers to sit back and do nothing and wait for an outcome. What kind of control is that? And I am a city fan 🤷♂️
Its in a brilliant state? 3 clubs have breached out of date rules and have or are copping point penalties…many other clubs have also breached these rules WITH NO PUNISHMENT or are on the verge. TALK ABOUT OUT OF TOUCH.
4 Billion pound but lower clubs struggling to keep afloat, kids holding raffles and bootsales to raise money to keep their club in business........what a fkn joke
FOOTBALL IS of public interest, it is nothing with the Fans...so the PL Needs to be alot more transparent, I hope the Independent Regulator shakes things up....and allow any charges to ANY CLUB to be heard in public....FFS Muder changes are screend live on TV....what are they hiding from the public?
Thought I was watching the Prince Andrew interview for a moment...I promise you this folks he's getting paid handsomely from some shady figures...stuttering his way through the questions is the sign of a liar...
All the PL games should be made available on a streaming service at a low price point. Amazon showed the way to do it for the 2 matchdays they've had for the last 5 years. Get out of Sky's backpocket and take the PL into the 21st Century digital age for heavens sake man.
Masters is a horrible little weasel. He talks here about not being able to speculate about City's possible punishment, yet the PL lobbied for Everton to receive a 17-points deduction and then the PL leaked their view to the press. City should have all 8 titles taken from them (but the runners up dont become champions for those 8 years) and City should be kicked out of the entire English football pyramid
You’re clearly not seeing the big Picture. All this bullshit about how much money can be spent, wasn’t an issue when the Red Cartel was winning everything. Someone said to me once when you become a threat they will do everything to destroy you.
It’s taking forever to adjudicate it because this whole enterprise is based on ethereal accusations in murky rules. There likely isn’t much actual hard evidence or they would have this wrapped up.
I recently heard someone say they had long suspected Manchester City of financial manipulation, dating back to 2011 when the club signed big names like Dzeko, Tevez, Balotelli, and Aguero. They mentioned how, at the time, it seemed obvious that a club struggling to fill its stadium and sell merchandise couldn’t afford such talent without bending the rules. Now, with the evidence of financial misconduct becoming clearer, they feel vindicated in their suspicions They also pointed out how recently Manchester City debuted a player who had been transferred multiple times within the City Group’s network, seeing this as another example of the financial games the club plays. They raised concerns about the integrity of the club, especially in light of City accusing the league of racism when questioned, similar to what PSG has done in the past What really struck me was their strong stance on defending football’s integrity. They argued that anyone supporting City’s ownership is contributing to the undermining of the sport. They referenced Everton’s recent eight-point deduction for a single charge, suggesting that City, with its 115 charges, deserves a far greater penalty, including stripping their titles won under such dubious circumstances. It’s a harsh view, but I can see their point
way to say your opinion in third person. I totally agree with you! In reality, like how people would say "what about chelsea" this is a government problem of the UK allowing foreign owners/funds. Roman was one thing, this is another.
Good on Jim for pushing about Man City’s charges and punishment. This league is a JOKE. We’re watching a cheating team dominate the league and win trebles. The premier league has had no balls and allowed them to get away with it. The league is getting significantly WORSE, not better.
Yes that correct because uefa already heard a case against them and found them guilty and that decision or judgement was not acted upon by the premier league. This 115 breaches is separate and is being tested by a fully independent legal commission. That case has to be allowed to go through due process without outside influence. Once the commission has made judgement the premier league must act on any guilty verdict in a consistent way, with how it dealt with other clubs.
Worm...I find it impossible that this man keeps his position after he admitted to being in meetings when the super league was discussed, his impartiality is shot to bits.
@@Efcdan1878 Masters and Scudamore were appointed by the red cartel, they are against us not for us. Surely there would be no charges at all if they were behind us? 🤦♂️
Another question gobby jim should have asked. ARE THE EPL ABOVE CAS who found city NOT GUILTY. CAS also brought the 30 million fine down to 10 million. And that for only giving information that was relevent! I hope the city sponsors and accountents over the last 15 years sue every EPL club for millions. 15 yrs of bad press by the EPL and MSM. There Must be a pay back.
The 115 charges has a massive outcome on the future of the premier league.The money clubs will break away if nothing comes of these charges Masters is a fool if he thinks otherwise.
That's why the charges were brought the money owners are American the esl is American it's been revamped you will now have leagues with promotion and relegation lots of money less pressure on players afterall Madrid barca juventus are still members just waiting for the teams to move over to them
Behind the scenes, several very unhappy top clubs will be putting pressure on the PL. It is completely conceivable that they will threaten to leave the PL if a guilty verdict is not adequately punished. Obviously they might be found not guilty.
@@james505ism Set up a new English top division/league - it’s happened before. And it was largely led by Arsenal, Liverpool, United and Spurs. Only this time city don’t get to join.
@@rosssloman1309 and have no relegation or ties with the rest of the footballing pyramid? And lose all of the existing commercial ties? Sounds good in theory but it would never happen lol footballs too commercially driven now and mostly owned by American and foreign investors who just want their payday. Your right though was those four and Everton who did it before.
@@james505ism ok, fair enough, but if city are found guilty and the consequences are deemed too lenient then what’s to stop another team thinking about breaking the rules? It could be considered ‘worth it’ if the punishment - if found guilty - was very slight.
@@rosssloman1309Do you agree with heavy punishment? Or do you think however long it takes to acquire information on every person and detail being most important. Or do you think it should be like the wild West. This applies to many situations in life. Also, we are talking about 'Actors' in different countries and this can take years of work and evidence. The real key is the result .
no matter what happens man city wil get hated forever if they get relegated people will still call them 115 charges and if they dont than they will call them oil money club
This guy is ineffectual, even for a figurehead. What's with the middle-ages tribunal? The opaque lack of transparency is pretty alarming for anyone who cares about the integrity of the league.
Jim always likes to make it appear that he is playing devil’s advocate under orders from above and that he doesn’t have his own agenda as though he isn’t a journalist. He doesn’t interrupt but he does use his body language, such as his facial expressions and his body language, to make it appear he is saying I’m not listening to your answer I’m just a mouth peace and I don’t have my own opinion either way. But Simon does! You see, Simon is his foil.
Funny how Masters has never used the buzzwords of the red media like "relegation" or "stripped" when they don't even correspond with the rule book. An awful lot are gonna be really disappointed..lol
single breach for everton and forrest is 6 pts. if city are guilty of even 25 of the 115 they will have to get a 150 pts deduction (relegation) never mind if found guilty of 60 or 80 of the 115. More over it would be a proper punishment to send them down 2 leagues
@@brianshockledge3241 you literally have not counter argument - you just throw insuts which mean nothing to me. tell me do you think City broke NO rule? that before the take over they could have got all the rev they got after the take over - they just didn't want to? do you know about the betting firm who sponsered them? no employees, no offices, and couldn't operate in europe? you don't think that was a fake sponser? Tell me how do you explain mancini getting 4 million for 2 years work, then getting the same for 2 weeks work from another club owned by the same people? have you read the mails? please explain why city asked the owner to put money into the sponser so the sponser could pay city? literally masking equity as sponsorship? WHY? serious please provide an answer to any of these things? if you can answer them GREAT you will prove you have knowledge of whats actually going on. if not - go away and stop being a child
Masters is so sus. His body language alone gives the impression of a man who is a puppet to the cartel clubs (IMO). Puts his head down after each comment, clearly uncomfortable in his own skin.
Two things needs to happen when City are found guilty; 1. All City’s 8 PL Championships should be removed from the history books. BUT the teams finishing second in those 8 years, DONT become Champions 2. City are kicked out of English football. If the club want to play again, they apply to join from the lowest level of the game
Jim White knew that Masters would not be able to answer the questions on City, Everton and Chelsea. So apart from being a discourteous prat, what was the point in asking them? If it were me, I'd have walked away from the interview and told White he would never interview me again. These journalists have no respect.
How that masters still has a job is amazing
100% agree he is trash
If you're reading this, let me save you some time, this guy says nothing, this interview is a waste of everyone's time. I lost respect for the Prem.
Richard Masters is an absolute joke
@@ancelottiseyebrow5206 true but he's steering the pl breakup and helping teams join the esl cos he bows down to the American owners
Those 115 charges will be sorted by 2040
There's nothing to worry about
Time for the other 19 clubs to sanction MC. Refuse to honour fixtures against them until they fully cooperate with the investigations. If found guilty, every club affected by them in loss of earnings over the last 10yrs should sue them for billions......
@@marineboy1964 why're you rushing it? they need more time than that.. eyeroll
@@potjhm1 They will never do that. its not finanically advisable to skip matches each match is like worth 20-50 mil
@@d3po607 They'd relegate MC & replace them with a Championship side......
@@d3po607 loool what do you mean worth 20-50 mil. what, you adding up everyones TV bill as well? cause there is no way you think 1 club makes 50 million pounds for one match. thats easily an average of a billion pounds a year, nearly all teams would be hugely profitable with that kinda revenue. also the big clubs in the prem would be worth much more when they'd be making about 1.5 billion a year just on matches alone.
Great questioning Masters avoiding the questions
Masters is out of his depth
Out of his depth? More like drowning! He wasn't asked to pre judge anything, Jim just asked him what the punishment might be. What are the EPL rules with regard to the alleged breaking of said rules? He either doesn't know or the EPL will only decide what penalties will apply if City are guilty. They seem to be reacting "on the fly".
@@petermainwaringsxthey make the punishments up. PL wanted to punish Everton with 10 points in the first charge, the independent board said that was absolute nonsense, they have no idea what they are doing.
He's in Mansour's pocket, more like.
The PL would be shooting itself in the foot if it chooses to expel the most successful club in England of the last decade. However, something must be done as this is now a make-or-break moment for the reputation of the FA and PL regarding how much control they have over their own sport.
@@jameswright4236you mean how much control the red cartel have over the league and the sooner we get Independant financial governing the better
Jim. You finally impressed me. Asking the hard questions. This needs a bright light shining on it.
funny how those rules were only enforced once the independent regulator was mentioned
OMG what a load of politicing. Ask him why the NHL, NFL, CFL MLB NBA and almost any other league, can complete investigations in a fraction of the time and the Premier league can't?
They can't bite the hand that feeds them...brown paper bags.
Man City have been accused of civil fraud, as part of 115 charges. Give me an example of where that’s happened with a US team and it’s been wrapped up immediately…
Masters getting a brown envelope
It should be the sack
No just brown pants.
Where is the question about man United 75 million dollars allowances
Scott parkers let himself go😮
Premier really good shape some clubs get a pass like united for spending Chelsea can spent well over a billion in just over a year free pass city have 115 charges and still winning leagues Everton and forest punished straight away fantastic running g of the league 👏👏👏hats off
The problem for the PL with FFP, Man City Richard is the rules were all over the place. The fact charges are over a 10 year plus time period implies the PL were incompetent, clueless in managing a fair, consistent, reactive system. City lawyers will run rings around the PL.
I wonder what the Premier League management will tell us if something has been overlooked for 15 years at a club that happens to win 6 out of 7 league titles. Why weren't they warned the year they should have been? Why do they want to punish ManCity now, when they already generate the most income for themselves? Why now?Why does this whole story reek of rival club interests? JimWilson, I think you've raised some good questions, but I'd add a couple.
Incompetent or complicit
Someone else who's been on a communication course (hand gestures are always the same)
Jim getting him Slithering in slime there with those questions
Five and a half years and he still couldn't run a bath! The PL 'fleeces' the fans by selling TV rights to companies when then call the tune! Games played on Friday nights, Saturday lunchtimes, Saturday evenings, Sunday lunchtimes, Sunday evenings etc, etc. all takes no account of fans commitments, or travelling., eg Newcastle at Arsenal on a Monday night! The majority of PL games don't get played on Saturday at 3pm anymore! and as for 'an independent panel, independently selected',..........by who Mr Masters? Tell us!
Politicians need to intervene in the mess this dude made 😡
The headline of this clip is BS
Masters is at best middle management,his whole attitude seemed to be how dare you ask questions just heap praise on me.
103 of the charges are technical phony charges brought by PL because the big charges are wrong or hard to prove. The most/only significant charge is that the sponsorship from Etihad Airlines was inflated. History has proven that completely wrong. The enormous success of Man City and Citygroup around the world have given Etihad Airlines exceptional value back.
Related to the sponsorship is possibly charges that Man City cooked the books, that is the owners paid part of the supposed sponsorship. This is highly unlikely because Man City's accounts were scrutinized thoroughly by their revision bureaus.
@joolsson1
• 54 charges of Failure to provide accurate financial information 2009-10 to 2017-18.
• 14 charges of Failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments from 2009-10 to 2017-18.
• 5 charges of Failure to comply with Uefa's rules including Financial Fair Play (FFP) 2013-14 to 2017-18.
• 7 charges of Breaching Premier League's PSR rules 2015-16 to 2017-18.
• 35 charges of Failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations December 2018 - Feb 2023.
@@dstewusa7054 A similar detailed investigation of all/most other PL-clubs going back to 2009 would probably have resulted in very many phony charges type: Failure to provide accurate financial information, Failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments, and Failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations.
@@dstewusa7054 so the main point is the " 7 charges of Breaching Premier League's PSR rules 2015-16 to 2017-18" bc if they can't prove MC guilty in those charges, all other charges is going to go down the drain.
How can you charge them failure to provide/co-operated if you can't find guilty in their book?
Well the etihad books are public now so that knocks that theory into touch
@@dstewusa7054some of the charges are for rules that didn't exist
Masters is a master of dodging the issues. No way City will be convicted
Well done for misleading us with the title talk sport. No explanation of when
What’s the point of someone in charge of the premier league no answers ffs
Why no questions about the ridiculous PSR rules which is only keeping the top clubs at the top? No one can break in and stay there regularly now. Time for a change.
Richard please submit your resignation. Thank you.
Masters is a disgrace.
Jim’s so eager to talk he can’t keep the mic from beings glued to face…. The guys an embarrassment!! He never listens and just enjoys his own voice!!
I think he's been skiing
Hi Richard Masters 👋🏾
It's difficult when you can't beat someone on the football field, because of that the club interests of other teams come to the fore. Why are you not so concerned with the new ManUnited scandal, in which they received discounts from the Premier League to avoid punishment that 19 other clubs did not? Yes, fair play, interesting interpretation...
The whole thing is starting to become a little unreliable, because you can see what it is about. It doesn't matter which team breaks the rules, but which clubs the league represents.
We will be able to watch Serie A, because the Premier League is already more corrupt than La Liga, and that is not easy to say.
There can’t be an epistle as nonsensical and irrelevant as what you just typed.
Well, kudos trying to convince yourself for yourself 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Convince myself? Because isn't that what's happening now? I understand that there are popular and unpopular teams, but that could be put aside for a moment. If something doesn't make sense to you, you've missed the point. @@kazeemolarewaju9395
Premier League risk of losing its prestige and reputation should they fail to punish City accordingly for what many knew to be the case.
What city done show me the proof
Tbf, the guy is the CEO, he's not a legal professional and will probably play no part in this hearing or even have anything to do with the rules the PL enforce. People greatly overestimate a CEO's involvement in a business's operations. A CEO is a yes/no man. He gets things put on his desk, and he says "will this make us money?" His directors say "yes" and he signs off on it. That being said, he is the face of the business, and should be open and transparent about matters.
Then why was he instructing the “independent” panels that was appointed by him what punishment should be imposed on Everton and Nottingham Forest.
@@davidtaylor6793 Because like I said... he's a CEO and he literally listens to what his advisors say. Trust me I'm not on Man City's side, Im a Liverpool fan, so anything but, what I'm saying is the CEO doesn't run a company. A CEO for a multi-million pound company does not run that company. The managers and directors do. The sales staff do, the marketing managers do, they are the people responsible for how a company is run. The CEO and the owners do not run a company. Take Man Utd for example, all the fans are blaming the owners, but its not their fault, they've pumped all the money in for the last 10 years, it's the director of football, the team manager, and the players that have let them down.
Diplomacy with little to no value or substance behind it is the essence of this guy's line of response.
If it's a guilty verdict the titles have to be stripped, it's the only appropriate punishment, they cheated for multiple seasons so they should be punished for multiple seasons, a relegation or points deduction will only affect them for one season, especially as they are a state-backed club. They'll just learn from their mistakes and do their cheating more covertly so hackers can't get to it
Grow up
@@paulbrickland9625 lmao at a bot telling a human to grow up
@@alexab543 when you learn how to speak properly then maybe we can have a conversation until mind your own business
@@paulbrickland9625 Bad bot
Not good enough. It’s our sport mate, not yours, or the premier league’s or Man City’s. The length of time it’s taking and the secrecy are a disgrace. If City are found guilty, the last decade of the prem goes down the toilet, and no punishment on City will fix that. This should have been sorted years ago, and we’re now starting another season where the competition is totally compromised in the eyes of the world.
Masters looks incredibly uncomfortable.
Richard Masters vs Mankind in a pink slip on a pole match
City is paying all this people to keep quiet
Masters about to get destroyed
The EPL charges against MC relate to a very long period, up to 12 seasons. The EPL rules changed over those periods, so the basis for acceptable and unacceptable financial activities will change from season to season. The system was therefore inconsistent and arbitrary. It should be relatively easy then for the MC lawyers to raise sufficient doubt in the panel's mind as to whether there was a deliberate purposeful and consistent pattern of MC abusing the financial regulations. Doubtless the panel will take ages to review all this and then find some minor grievances and fine MC accordingly, maybe throw in a suspended points deduction and a recommendation for the EPL to adopt new financial regulations closer to the UEFA FFP.
Reply
no there were rules in place in each year that every team was aware of and city BROKE IT - MANY MANY TIMES
@@Redballoon99 You are a balloon, how apt.
I think you`ll find the witch hunt didn`t start in 2006
@@brianshockledge3241 do you even know the 115 charges, have you actually read the mails and the evidence. do you know what it is they did. it doesn't sound likt you do.
@@Redballoon99 I have actually seen the charges it looks like a child has cobbled them together whereas you clearly haven`t you`re just going off the red media propaganda. I`m afraid you are going to be very disappointed.
A 13 minute interview with absolutely nothing said.
He's from a cricket background and he knows nothing ...England were well managed ... Mike basset could have won the euros with that squad..
He was quick enough to put time limits on Evertons and forest charges ... independent panels he picked Evertons first panel and asked for 12 points ..how isn't he inputting what points he wants city to have ...
It's master job to stop teams outside the sly six not succeeding ...
Teams trying to build teams and stadiums to compete or even stay in the league are getting punished but yet the favourites can spend and do what they want ..
So the premier league bring charges against various clubs and then hand it over to an independent panel and lawyers to sit back and do nothing and wait for an outcome. What kind of control is that? And I am a city fan 🤷♂️
Can't answer a question won't answer a question what a waste of air.
🤢🤢🤮 Richard needs to go to jail himself 🤢🤢🤮
Its in a brilliant state? 3 clubs have breached out of date rules and have or are copping point penalties…many other clubs have also breached these rules WITH NO PUNISHMENT or are on the verge. TALK ABOUT OUT OF TOUCH.
What if the “independant regulators” are united fans or bias?
The way Mr Masters was wiping his brow and hands I'm guessing the heating was on full power 😅😅 CTID 💙💙
It is in the realm of hacking. It might take years but, I see serious ramifications . Jobs losses for some too.
4 Billion pound but lower clubs struggling to keep afloat, kids holding raffles and bootsales to raise money to keep their club in business........what a fkn joke
FOOTBALL IS of public interest, it is nothing with the Fans...so the PL Needs to be alot more transparent, I hope the Independent Regulator shakes things up....and allow any charges to ANY CLUB to be heard in public....FFS Muder changes are screend live on TV....what are they hiding from the public?
Thought I was watching the Prince Andrew interview for a moment...I promise you this folks he's getting paid handsomely from some shady figures...stuttering his way through the questions is the sign of a liar...
Sure is. He knows they have no case and he knows City will win...
All the PL games should be made available on a streaming service at a low price point. Amazon showed the way to do it for the 2 matchdays they've had for the last 5 years. Get out of Sky's backpocket and take the PL into the 21st Century digital age for heavens sake man.
This guy comes across as being sly as hell. He answered nothing of any note, and reminds me of a dodgey politician.
Can't comment on City case openly asked for 12 pts against us
Who are the members of this "independent" commission/panel adjudicating on the 115 charges? Which clubs (and/or organisations) do they belong to?
Don't let this distract you from the fact that Phil Leotardo turned into a house in The Sopranos season 6.
Guy is a piece of work
Masters is a horrible little weasel. He talks here about not being able to speculate about City's possible punishment, yet the PL lobbied for Everton to receive a 17-points deduction and then the PL leaked their view to the press. City should have all 8 titles taken from them (but the runners up dont become champions for those 8 years) and City should be kicked out of the entire English football pyramid
You’re clearly not seeing the big Picture. All this bullshit about how much money can be spent, wasn’t an issue when the Red Cartel was winning everything. Someone said to me once when you become a threat they will do everything to destroy you.
City would be successful in any league so if you force them out to the esl how long do you think it will be before all the prem teams follow
man city will be cleared end of the conversation
impossible
@@Redballoon99ok
Of course we will. Zero evidence but we have to dance their dance
It’s taking forever to adjudicate it because this whole enterprise is based on ethereal accusations in murky rules. There likely isn’t much actual hard evidence or they would have this wrapped up.
@@wirelessreconllc9092 carry on . Fascinating. I like it when people can't see what's really happening. It's like bait on a line .
Thought Jim was going to ask him if his car was going to pass its mot or what Labour might do with the autumn budget.
I recently heard someone say they had long suspected Manchester City of financial manipulation, dating back to 2011 when the club signed big names like Dzeko, Tevez, Balotelli, and Aguero. They mentioned how, at the time, it seemed obvious that a club struggling to fill its stadium and sell merchandise couldn’t afford such talent without bending the rules. Now, with the evidence of financial misconduct becoming clearer, they feel vindicated in their suspicions
They also pointed out how recently Manchester City debuted a player who had been transferred multiple times within the City Group’s network, seeing this as another example of the financial games the club plays. They raised concerns about the integrity of the club, especially in light of City accusing the league of racism when questioned, similar to what PSG has done in the past
What really struck me was their strong stance on defending football’s integrity. They argued that anyone supporting City’s ownership is contributing to the undermining of the sport. They referenced Everton’s recent eight-point deduction for a single charge, suggesting that City, with its 115 charges, deserves a far greater penalty, including stripping their titles won under such dubious circumstances. It’s a harsh view, but I can see their point
way to say your opinion in third person. I totally agree with you! In reality, like how people would say "what about chelsea" this is a government problem of the UK allowing foreign owners/funds. Roman was one thing, this is another.
JIM WHITE AND TK ARE OBSESSED WITH THE 115... THATS ALL they talk about , it's getting boreing
Masters looks like he sings in a Bryan Ferry cover-band.
Very good questions and the worst answers there can be.
Man city will stick money under the table to close the case in Masters' other words " Its confidential "
Good on Jim for pushing about Man City’s charges and punishment. This league is a JOKE. We’re watching a cheating team dominate the league and win trebles. The premier league has had no balls and allowed them to get away with it. The league is getting significantly WORSE, not better.
As with a lot of things atm, we need to get tougher and no stones should remain unturned in this case
Womp womp
Accused
Yes that correct because uefa already heard a case against them and found them guilty and that decision or judgement was not acted upon by the premier league. This 115 breaches is separate and is being tested by a fully independent legal commission. That case has to be allowed to go through due process without outside influence. Once the commission has made judgement the premier league must act on any guilty verdict in a consistent way, with how it dealt with other clubs.
Salt. Salty. Lemon
Worm...I find it impossible that this man keeps his position after he admitted to being in meetings when the super league was discussed, his impartiality is shot to bits.
Is he on the city payroll?
The red club's payroll hence the shame rules and charges.....keep up
@@SuperCityMCFC😂😂😂😂 surely even you don't believe that ...him and scudamore have kept the wolves away for 15 years
@@Efcdan1878 Masters and Scudamore were appointed by the red cartel, they are against us not for us. Surely there would be no charges at all if they were behind us? 🤦♂️
The rules were changed when they whant after Everton
Corruption makes you sweat doesn't it Richard. 🤣🤣🤣
Headline " explains when the charges will be concluded"
The video " cant say nothing mate" 😂
Why was,nt the snake asked about man utd preferential treatment on ffp
He dodges all questions
Another question gobby jim should have asked. ARE THE EPL ABOVE CAS who found city NOT GUILTY.
CAS also brought the 30 million fine down to 10 million.
And that for only giving information that was relevent!
I hope the city sponsors and accountents over the last 15 years sue every EPL club for millions. 15 yrs of bad press by the EPL and MSM. There Must be a pay back.
They didn't find you not guilty the case timed out conveniently 🤦♂️
The 115 charges has a massive outcome on the future of the premier league.The money clubs will break away if nothing comes of these charges Masters is a fool if he thinks otherwise.
That's why the charges were brought the money owners are American the esl is American it's been revamped you will now have leagues with promotion and relegation lots of money less pressure on players afterall Madrid barca juventus are still members just waiting for the teams to move over to them
Masters is the biggest scab out there since the Nottinghamshire miners
Behind the scenes, several very unhappy top clubs will be putting pressure on the PL. It is completely conceivable that they will threaten to leave the PL if a guilty verdict is not adequately punished. Obviously they might be found not guilty.
Leave and give up all there income? And go where 😂 the rules are a joke but no one’s leaving lol
@@james505ism Set up a new English top division/league - it’s happened before. And it was largely led by Arsenal, Liverpool, United and Spurs. Only this time city don’t get to join.
@@rosssloman1309 and have no relegation or ties with the rest of the footballing pyramid? And lose all of the existing commercial ties? Sounds good in theory but it would never happen lol footballs too commercially driven now and mostly owned by American and foreign investors who just want their payday. Your right though was those four and Everton who did it before.
@@james505ism ok, fair enough, but if city are found guilty and the consequences are deemed too lenient then what’s to stop another team thinking about breaking the rules? It could be considered ‘worth it’ if the punishment - if found guilty - was very slight.
@@rosssloman1309Do you agree with heavy punishment? Or do you think however long it takes to acquire information on every person and detail being most important. Or do you think it should be like the wild West. This applies to many situations in life. Also, we are talking about 'Actors' in different countries and this can take years of work and evidence. The real key is the result .
He doesn't want any thing but on the field football talked about yet he announced it to great fanfare telling the media before city
Good advert for best league in the world 😂😂😂😂
There was no hard questioning here for god sake, Jim mentioned FFP once and then moved on as if nothing of importance here lol
no matter what happens man city wil get hated forever if they get relegated people will still call them 115 charges and if they dont than they will call them oil money club
Simon Jordan response to this taken down ey
The questioning here is not great
Swap him out for Scott Parker. They look the same and have about the same ability to run the league.
This guy is ineffectual, even for a figurehead. What's with the middle-ages tribunal? The opaque lack of transparency is pretty alarming for anyone who cares about the integrity of the league.
Tricky Dicky.... dancing round the questions like that Australian break dancer
Masters would make a great politician 😂😂😂😂🤦🤦
The Red cartel mouthpiece
Jim always likes to make it appear that he is playing devil’s advocate under orders from above and that he doesn’t have his own agenda as though he isn’t a journalist. He doesn’t interrupt but he does use his body language, such as his facial expressions and his body language, to make it appear he is saying I’m not listening to your answer I’m just a mouth peace and I don’t have my own opinion either way. But Simon does! You see, Simon is his foil.
City proved there innocence and have won there case in your face Richard masters
No they didn’t, that’s a different case
Masters will be booted out soon.
Terrible interview.
Funny how Masters has never used the buzzwords of the red media like "relegation" or "stripped" when they don't even correspond with the rule book. An awful lot are gonna be really disappointed..lol
single breach for everton and forrest is 6 pts. if city are guilty of even 25 of the 115 they will have to get a 150 pts deduction (relegation)
never mind if found guilty of 60 or 80 of the 115.
More over it would be a proper punishment to send them down 2 leagues
@@Redballoon99 Whose using the family brain cell today? it sure isn`t you.
@@brianshockledge3241 you literally have not counter argument - you just throw insuts which mean nothing to me.
tell me do you think City broke NO rule?
that before the take over they could have got all the rev they got after the take over - they just didn't want to?
do you know about the betting firm who sponsered them? no employees, no offices, and couldn't operate in europe? you don't think that was a fake sponser? Tell me how do you explain mancini getting 4 million for 2 years work, then getting the same for 2 weeks work from another club owned by the same people?
have you read the mails? please explain why city asked the owner to put money into the sponser so the sponser could pay city? literally masking equity as sponsorship? WHY?
serious please provide an answer to any of these things? if you can answer them GREAT you will prove you have knowledge of whats actually going on. if not - go away and stop being a child
@@Redballoon99 keep using the same buzzwords that you heard for copium..lol
@@DavidRegaL-lw5xz what buzz words ?
This guy needs to step down, it’s as simple as that. Nobody likes him, nobody trusts him, he is awful at his job.
England fantastic team at the Euros? When everyone else was deriding them,he is delusional,not surprised really. Amen.
They will get a fine lol. We all know it.
Masters is so sus. His body language alone gives the impression of a man who is a puppet to the cartel clubs (IMO). Puts his head down after each comment, clearly uncomfortable in his own skin.
This guy is trying to justify his existence, He fails.
0:58 is he on smack???
Buy GME
Two things needs to happen when City are found guilty;
1. All City’s 8 PL Championships should be removed from the history books. BUT the teams finishing second in those 8 years, DONT become Champions
2. City are kicked out of English football. If the club want to play again, they apply to join from the lowest level of the game
Sort your mike out Jim!!!
Jim White knew that Masters would not be able to answer the questions on City, Everton and Chelsea. So apart from being a discourteous prat, what was the point in asking them? If it were me, I'd have walked away from the interview and told White he would never interview me again. These journalists have no respect.
He was happy to answer Questions on us but all to secretive over City
115 charges 2 years later still no end. the credibility of the premier league will be destroyed if city don't get sent back to league two