The Turkish conquests were something like the Crusades. The Ottoman rulers called for a fight against the infidels and they were joined by Muslims not only from the territories of the Ottoman sultans but also from distant Muslim countries. That is also why the Ottoman Armies were so numerous, even if compared to, for example, European countries, the size of their territory did not correspond to this. The reward of their soldiers was what they stole, including people. In practice, the Ottoman sultans were just big thieves.
They where vicious, in Serbia we have preserved memories from those times and one of them is "tax in blood" where Ottomans would take a male baby or child up to 2-3 yeas old and take it to Constantinople (Istambul) to train them as Janissary. Mothers would cut of fingers of kids so they would not be taken, as they would not be stable for Ottoman army.
If you intend to study Serbian history, you must use historical and ethnological evidence. There is no evidence of Serbian migration to the Balkan Peninsula in the 7th century, only evidence of autochthonism in these territories.
With a few small inherent exceptions due to the intrigues of the imperial powers, Romanians and Serbs were the best neighbors. The only thing that casts a shadow is the treatment of religious rights and schools in the mother tongue of the Vlachs in Serbia just like in Bulgaria or Greece.
For about 29 minutes, you talk about a coalition of Bulgarians, Serbs, Hungarians and Bosnians (Bosniaks). The king of Bosnia at the time, Stefan Tvrtko I, bore the title - King of the Serbs of Bosnia, Primorje and Humska Land (today's Herzegovina). No Bosnians are mentioned anywhere, only Serbs. It seems that you know better than Tvrtko whose king he was? The ideology of the Vatican, the Comintern and the modern Liberal Empire is so powerful in your story, but it is an ideological story, not history.
@@JosipRadnik1 Yes, it is a very solid continuity of creating anti-Serbs from Islamized Serbs. First, Benjamin Kalaj as an exponent of the Vatican policy in Bosnia, then the decisions of the Dresden Congress of the Communists of Yugoslavia made on the instructions of the Comintern, and finally Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Jacques Chirac, Gerhard Schroeder... who fulfilled the Comintern's decisions, item by item. And those decisions were: break up Yugoslavia at any cost and create "independent" Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, and annex Kosovo to Albania as satellites of the empire. And so in 1993, during the NATO aggression against Republika Srpska (along with the Iranian Republican Guard, the Afghan Mujahideen, Hezbollah... etc.), the Bosnian and Herzegovinian Muslims (thus a religious group) constituted themselves as a nation called Bosniaks. Of course you know that, Josipe, you're just pretending to be English. And the Pole projected the situation after 1993 into the Middle Ages and found Bosniaks there when they were not there.
@@JosipRadnik1 Josip 😂😂😂 Dont play dump ustasa, you know Vatican and Communists had close ties. Every country that fell under communism destroyed Orthodox church, what Catholic where not even touched.
The hero who killed Sultan-harem Murad was Dardanian-Arbanian Prince Mëhill Kopili from Dardanian-Arbanian Drenica region.. His family is still living over there..
@@pripri632When you don't have your own, of course you will invent or steal other people's history like the Albanians have been doing for a little over a hundred years since they existed.
Great short recapitulation of medieval history for this area of Europe.
Can you make video about croatian history
You can make it in shorts since there isnt much to talk about
@@etoeto6754 Hahahhahaha
I think he just did.
So unaccurate.
The Turkish conquests were something like the Crusades. The Ottoman rulers called for a fight against the infidels and they were joined by Muslims not only from the territories of the Ottoman sultans but also from distant Muslim countries. That is also why the Ottoman Armies were so numerous, even if compared to, for example, European countries, the size of their territory did not correspond to this. The reward of their soldiers was what they stole, including people. In practice, the Ottoman sultans were just big thieves.
They where vicious, in Serbia we have preserved memories from those times and one of them is "tax in blood" where Ottomans would take a male baby or child up to 2-3 yeas old and take it to Constantinople (Istambul) to train them as Janissary. Mothers would cut of fingers of kids so they would not be taken, as they would not be stable for Ottoman army.
If you intend to study Serbian history, you must use historical and ethnological evidence. There is no evidence of Serbian migration to the Balkan Peninsula in the 7th century, only evidence of autochthonism in these territories.
With a few small inherent exceptions due to the intrigues of the imperial powers, Romanians and Serbs were the best neighbors. The only thing that casts a shadow is the treatment of religious rights and schools in the mother tongue of the Vlachs in Serbia just like in Bulgaria or Greece.
For about 29 minutes, you talk about a coalition of Bulgarians, Serbs, Hungarians and Bosnians (Bosniaks). The king of Bosnia at the time, Stefan Tvrtko I, bore the title - King of the Serbs of Bosnia, Primorje and Humska Land (today's Herzegovina). No Bosnians are mentioned anywhere, only Serbs. It seems that you know better than Tvrtko whose king he was? The ideology of the Vatican, the Comintern and the modern Liberal Empire is so powerful in your story, but it is an ideological story, not history.
The Vatican, the Comintern (!?!) and the Liberal Empire... wow, THAT sounds like some solid coalition. 🤨
@@JosipRadnik1 Yes, it is a very solid continuity of creating anti-Serbs from Islamized Serbs. First, Benjamin Kalaj as an exponent of the Vatican policy in Bosnia, then the decisions of the Dresden Congress of the Communists of Yugoslavia made on the instructions of the Comintern, and finally Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Jacques Chirac, Gerhard Schroeder... who fulfilled the Comintern's decisions, item by item. And those decisions were: break up Yugoslavia at any cost and create "independent" Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, and annex Kosovo to Albania as satellites of the empire. And so in 1993, during the NATO aggression against Republika Srpska (along with the Iranian Republican Guard, the Afghan Mujahideen, Hezbollah... etc.), the Bosnian and Herzegovinian Muslims (thus a religious group) constituted themselves as a nation called Bosniaks. Of course you know that, Josipe, you're just pretending to be English. And the Pole projected the situation after 1993 into the Middle Ages and found Bosniaks there when they were not there.
@@JosipRadnik1 Josip 😂😂😂 Dont play dump ustasa, you know Vatican and Communists had close ties. Every country that fell under communism destroyed Orthodox church, what Catholic where not even touched.
Do you think that the murder of sultan Murat by the knight Miloš Obilić is a myth or is it true?
The hero who killed Sultan-harem Murad was Dardanian-Arbanian Prince Mëhill Kopili from Dardanian-Arbanian Drenica region..
His family is still living over there..
@@pripri632 Ahahaha you are funny. Albanian tribes came with Ottomans from Azerbeijan.
@@pripri632When you don't have your own, of course you will invent or steal other people's history like the Albanians have been doing for a little over a hundred years since they existed.