Much as I enjoy the chess, I enjoy even more the self-examining soliloques. You're correct that there is an asymmetry between how unforgiving chess and life can be. Even at the lowest ebb of agony in life, recovery is always possible, and it's through the recovery that your lessons are drawn. In chess, you blunder a pawn, and you’re probably toast. guh & ggs Mohammed
It's a good point, I'm 1840 and my games are similar. I watch eric rosens, Daniel Narodski and another GM which I can't remember his name, speed runs and one thing I notice is they normally have less time than their opponents and still always win. The middle and the end game is all about calculation, generally the more time you spend on calculating, the better yours moves will be. I noticed in this video we can't hear your breathing 👏🏾 Yesterday we could, what did you do different?
today I was talking the whole time 😅 to be fair though, those gms ims etc can spend 90% of the time chitchatting etc during the game cuz they have the high speed skills to finish off the rest of the game in under a minute. the rest of us gotta use a different time strat but similar idea of using time when it counts
People dont suck at chess because of their ratings. at lower levels. it's due to bad board vision, and at higher levels, it is because of lazy calculations
Great wisdom by you Belissa 🙏 Share more in the future with us 😉 ! I don't know, but maybe its sometimes not easy for you - what I mean with that, you are US Citizen with chinese roots & the political situation nów I mean many people see China as a treath....ok you know what I mean(I hope)
I have a lot to say on this topic but shouldn't yap when sleep deprived. Briefly though, one of the reasons I love chess is the depth it provides and that is lost on these people that always make such shallow moves. We do all these complex puzzles but in actual games the win is "take free piece" or "remove defender". It is legitimately painful at times to see your opponents play like this. Maybe 15+10 would help with that, but that would be detrimental to your rating goal. I would recommend watching Daniel Naroditsky deal with people who move instantly. His games in the "Top Theory Speedrun" around the 1500-2000 range are his best content.
mm i watched some of it. Some lines are really sexy though, even at this level but this day just happened to be a hodgepodge of one move blunders lol i agree with the beauty of depth and complexity, tho sometimes im lazy to think!
@@JimmyChessin It's not the rating that matters. It's a player's drive, their will. I used to be rated less than 1200 in rapid at the start of this year, just 3 months ago I was rated in the 1200s. Guess what my rating is right now, it's 1650. Anyone who enjoys playing chess, calculating moves, thinking about positions can achieve a higher rating. Just this week I went from 1450 to 1650. You can be a better player as well bro. Have a nice day
Thank you that’s what I’ve been doing just making content with my journey as a chess player but I appreciate the encouragement I’ve been practicing and focusing on it 👏🏽
u play what u feel like playing. its not all about the off chance of not losing, if it kills you slowly to play a dead lost game for another 10 minutes id rather do something else with 10 min
1700s felt so bad to me when I was 1900, they would always just make obvious blunderes now im low 1700s and it feels like the 1700s are playing better than the 1900s ever did. They arent really blundering anymore and I really have to try to win positionally in order to not eventually lose
I got the perfect answer to this riddle. Cuz they are chess babies trying to drink milk and they gotta suck it bad🤱 can’t help getting thirsty/hungry and the temptation is there.
Much as I enjoy the chess, I enjoy even more the self-examining soliloques.
You're correct that there is an asymmetry between how unforgiving chess and life can be.
Even at the lowest ebb of agony in life, recovery is always possible, and it's through the recovery that your lessons are drawn. In chess, you blunder a pawn, and you’re probably toast.
guh & ggs
Mohammed
haha, guh guh.
i have more thoughts about this, tbc✌
It's a good point, I'm 1840 and my games are similar. I watch eric rosens, Daniel Narodski and another GM which I can't remember his name, speed runs and one thing I notice is they normally have less time than their opponents and still always win.
The middle and the end game is all about calculation, generally the more time you spend on calculating, the better yours moves will be.
I noticed in this video we can't hear your breathing 👏🏾 Yesterday we could, what did you do different?
today I was talking the whole time 😅
to be fair though, those gms ims etc can spend 90% of the time chitchatting etc during the game cuz they have the high speed skills to finish off the rest of the game in under a minute. the rest of us gotta use a different time strat but similar idea of using time when it counts
@BelisaChess Hmmm good point, but they are normally talking about the game similar to how you talk the games in your videos but yes, good point
Much love ♥️ for everyone !!! Especially for you Belissa 😘 The world needs more people like you ! You are soooo beautyful person ! God bless you 🙏
hahah God bless you too my friend
appreciate your reflections! we're here for it when you feel inspired to drop some wisdom
aw, appreciate your presence ☺🙏
People dont suck at chess because of their ratings. at lower levels. it's due to bad board vision, and at higher levels, it is because of lazy calculations
Nah, fam, we trash out here. I'm garbage
@@MasterInHDThat’s the truth. We all suck
LOL. (at the replies)
yeah I think that could be mostly true, tho i still have bad board vision - everything relative ofc
or, lower levels-no calculation at all, higher- shitty calc, then highest0 sometimes flawed
“Let’s checkmate the king honey” 😂 you’re hilarious
😄
Great wisdom by you Belissa 🙏 Share more in the future with us 😉 ! I don't know, but maybe its sometimes not easy for you - what I mean with that, you are US Citizen with chinese roots & the political situation nów I mean many people see China as a treath....ok you know what I mean(I hope)
yes, I know what you mean, thank u haha, I am fine for now 😄
I have a lot to say on this topic but shouldn't yap when sleep deprived. Briefly though, one of the reasons I love chess is the depth it provides and that is lost on these people that always make such shallow moves. We do all these complex puzzles but in actual games the win is "take free piece" or "remove defender".
It is legitimately painful at times to see your opponents play like this. Maybe 15+10 would help with that, but that would be detrimental to your rating goal. I would recommend watching Daniel Naroditsky deal with people who move instantly. His games in the "Top Theory Speedrun" around the 1500-2000 range are his best content.
mm i watched some of it. Some lines are really sexy though, even at this level but this day just happened to be a hodgepodge of one move blunders lol
i agree with the beauty of depth and complexity, tho sometimes im lazy to think!
Good Video if 1700's suck 1200's got no chance 😅
they're basically the same
yes you do, against fellow 1200s! fight at your level
@@BelisaChess thanks for the encouragement lol
@@JimmyChessin It's not the rating that matters. It's a player's drive, their will. I used to be rated less than 1200 in rapid at the start of this year, just 3 months ago I was rated in the 1200s.
Guess what my rating is right now, it's 1650. Anyone who enjoys playing chess, calculating moves, thinking about positions can achieve a higher rating.
Just this week I went from 1450 to 1650.
You can be a better player as well bro.
Have a nice day
Thank you that’s what I’ve been doing just making content with my journey as a chess player but I appreciate the encouragement I’ve been practicing and focusing on it 👏🏽
Is beyond my capabilities of understanding that 1700s resign games, when even in my 2300s games, swindles happen and they happen a LOT.
u play what u feel like playing. its not all about the off chance of not losing, if it kills you slowly to play a dead lost game for another 10 minutes id rather do something else with 10 min
This what I mean 12:24 , he resigned a +1.7 position. I've comeback from M8 positions, bruh.
here he had to go
44:05 those forty years on this earth have brought you wisdom
hahha yes sir...yes sir...😆😆😆
1700s felt so bad to me when I was 1900, they would always just make obvious blunderes
now im low 1700s and it feels like the 1700s are playing better than the 1900s ever did. They arent really blundering anymore and I really have to try to win positionally in order to not eventually lose
hahah we must be on a tilt of some kind, they are prob still blundering but you gotta see it 😄
I hate playing 1500s the most.
the 1600s are worse
thought u were talking abt ppl that lived in the 1700s
LOL
At 5:48 you wanted to exchange on d4 but Bg5 wins the queen!
its not my move
Sorry I meant after Qf4 by white@@BelisaChess
@@realdrummo ahh i see, multiple ways to rome 😆
new to your channel, what's with the "guh" comments?
its a thang 😃
now a trend!
I got the perfect answer to this riddle. Cuz they are chess babies trying to drink milk and they gotta suck it bad🤱 can’t help getting thirsty/hungry and the temptation is there.
hahahahah phen that has to be one of the craziest things u've said
🤣🤣
guh
Buh
guh