When will we see this theory as a valid breakthrough in science so that it can be printed in textbooks and when will we see your theory as international news of physics breakthrough?
@@EnergyWaveTheory It is disappointing to me. Because I was excited and thought that the era of physics will get revolutionised once again very soon. It seems it is not as simple and obvious as I thought to get international attention. Not only for personal fame and benefit of the discoverer but also mostly because of the betterment of human civilization. It doesn't make me feel nice. :( However, I guess I can only hope that you get proper attention from all scientific community. I wish my wish comes true.
@@idontknow5994 To your point, let's hope for the betterment of human civilization that we do find the answers. Because when we do, I truly believe it will unlock new products that can make a difference for future generations.
Do you have a discord?? Would you be open to having a conversation about the idea of wave-front spins, and how they may explain the collapse of a wave-function, or termination of a Von Neumann Chain?
@@sandorphoenix By email would be best. You can find my email address in papers linked from the EWT home page (bottom of page) at energywavetheory.com.
As far as I can see, basically you're trying to numerically reproduce the results of field theory formalism, which ultimately stems from considering a bunch of connected oscillators - i.e. exactly your mass-spring system. I am a bit surprised you're even trying to do so in the first place, as the end result would quite obviously be the same (with the formation of quasi-particles, just as happens in field quantization). Yet in the process the numerical integration itself would introduce a lot of inherent errors. So basically you're trying to repeat the already known result the hard way.
If it has already been done and simulated, then it should be quite easy for someone to enter the contest with their existing program and win $2,500 for the first phase of the project. :)
Guess the inverse square electric field at a radius out is the wave energy after spreading. Easy with a waving picture!
Fantastic!!
When will we see this theory as a valid breakthrough in science so that it can be printed in textbooks and when will we see your theory as international news of physics breakthrough?
I don't know. :)
@@EnergyWaveTheory It is disappointing to me. Because I was excited and thought that the era of physics will get revolutionised once again very soon. It seems it is not as simple and obvious as I thought to get international attention. Not only for personal fame and benefit of the discoverer but also mostly because of the betterment of human civilization. It doesn't make me feel nice. :( However, I guess I can only hope that you get proper attention from all scientific community. I wish my wish comes true.
@@idontknow5994 To your point, let's hope for the betterment of human civilization that we do find the answers. Because when we do, I truly believe it will unlock new products that can make a difference for future generations.
@@EnergyWaveTheoryThanks for giving me hope. I also believe the same.
Do you have a discord?? Would you be open to having a conversation about the idea of wave-front spins, and how they may explain the collapse of a wave-function, or termination of a Von Neumann Chain?
There's not a discord on this topic, no. But happy to have a conversation using a different format, or perhaps email.
@@EnergyWaveTheory I have many questions. How can I connect with you?
@@sandorphoenix By email would be best. You can find my email address in papers linked from the EWT home page (bottom of page) at energywavetheory.com.
As far as I can see, basically you're trying to numerically reproduce the results of field theory formalism, which ultimately stems from considering a bunch of connected oscillators - i.e. exactly your mass-spring system.
I am a bit surprised you're even trying to do so in the first place, as the end result would quite obviously be the same (with the formation of quasi-particles, just as happens in field quantization). Yet in the process the numerical integration itself would introduce a lot of inherent errors.
So basically you're trying to repeat the already known result the hard way.
If it has already been done and simulated, then it should be quite easy for someone to enter the contest with their existing program and win $2,500 for the first phase of the project. :)