I wish people would take a moment and look at the earth. North and South poles. Always moving. We live in the power that's all around us all the time. I appreciate your time and work with this video which shows the exchange of knowledge. God bless
This is for the chance encounter guy who just posted: Just like so many people, you never listened to the instructions. The purpose of the machine was a mechanical oscillator for pumping negative energy. As such you can produce enormous amounts of energy if you understand what you are dealing with. I have shown for years that you can in fact charge up many more batteries than what was input into the system. Or run many other loads. It was never meant to charge up little batteries or power little loads. Once you realize that then you will see how mistaken you have been. Years ago I did such a test. I ran my little 3 pole kit that I made, which thousands of people have all over the world. I charged up one little battery at the same rate as the other little battery discharged. So far this is all you understood about this setup. That was just the very basic beginning to see that I was doing something for free as the one battery was not actually charging, and could not actually charge the other battery. Anyway, then I replaced the 12AH 12V charging battery with a 2000AH 48V battery bank. And guess what happened? It resulted in over 200 times more useable energy than previous in the 12AH battery over the same amount of time. Of course that was a COP of 200. This was not new to me as I had done smaller experiments. But guess what, that was just the very basic setup. I have shown over the years many other ways to use that simple system to produce extra energy than what people expected. Bedini never expected this system to be a motor, but I showed him any everyone that it could be used as such with a little improvement. Of course Bedini didn't invent this system at all as it predates him over 25 years as I have shown. The processes are not confined to this motor or motors at all as I have shown. But setup, even with it's limitations has great potential and needs to be respected. I hope you take the time to actually learn more of the real potential of these kinds of systems rather than just mock things out of ignorance.
hello, I built a bedinie wheel with 6 windings with 4 transistors each and a trigger. Could we add 3 additional windings to 7 transistors for the same trigger? Thank you
In the end , a system like yours would be"The Dream" for me!👍👍I made a small 2 coil system of a 28 gauge and 20 gauge bifilar coil and my results are"ok", it works but like Tim the Toolman...I want more power! I need to know what is more important...gauge or turns when making a bifilar coil? I have an abundance of magnet wire in 28, 20, 18,16 and 12 gauge. Would a coil of 20/16 @ 200 turns be more/less productive than a coil of 28/16@500 turns? What about 100 turns of 18/12 gauge...any advice would be greatly appreciated! Thanks
That's like asking are squares better than circles or apples better than oranges. Different coils have different purposes. It depends on what you want to do and what voltages you want to run. There are too many factors and considerations for someone else to figure out what someone wants to do. This is why I don't prefer to get into trying to figure out what someone wants to do with their own parts. I provide parts for specific purposes. I teach on these important themes and give information and basic demonstration on how to do these various things. There are no magical numbers with these coils. There are better and worse materials, higher or lower Q, resonance or out of resonance, etc. But wire gauge and turns is a voltage/amperage deal. Here is an example. Before my first big Resonance Convention in 2010 Bedini used thousands of dollars of my wire to make very large coils. I asked him politely what he was planning to do with it when adding it to the 13" Ferris wheel I was assembling for my meeting. I realized he was making a big costly mistake but wasn't about to embarrass him about it. I realized in that example that he really didn't know what he was doing on this basic level. I mean, if you have 90 pounds of #18 wire (which was divided into several wire lengths) then you need fairly high voltage to drive that coil. And that is what happened. He spent two weeks trying to figure out a way to use those coils and couldn't come up with anything. He ended up running the several big coils at 36V and it didn't do any better than my one little coil running at 12V 1W. Of course hundreds of people at the meeting (and later thousands of people who watched the videos) were enchanted by his words for no good reason.
@@rgolliff1 Measuring only the voltage is how the scam works. The only honest measurement in this industry is an integrating wattmeter. The world is still waiting for a Bedini video that shows one.
I've seen the whole documentary on this and understand the concept but not the details.. What level of electrical engineering do I need to learn before I can understand and build something like this? I want to learn how to use the permanent magnets in order to turn the wheel and how to build a dynamo to capture the energy. All these things are made to look fairly simple by john bedini. And also people like elon musk with his tesla motor etc. But where to start?
We have many of these kits that are much improved on our R-Charge.com website. There is very little to know besides the basics of working with batteries. You don't have to understand what the specific parts are to build and use these systems. Our 4 Dualpole kits have their own generator coils added to the system. As for John, he didn't invent this at all. The basic School Girl system goes back at least to a 1974 patent that you see in the top spinner. The monopole goes back at least to Robert Adams, but also before him. Charging batteries with BEMF also goes way back. Tesla Motors does not use this kind of technology. I hope this helps.
See my other videos as this video does not cover the how. It is not BEMF. The exact nature of the energy will always be uncertain, but the process can be replicated.
Nice video of some history made. I am still researching, and have watched your series on loving circuits, I have read much about Tesla and his findings, and still want to understand the energy that he was able to get a small glimpse of in Colorado. There are others that I have read, like Steinmetz, Moray, Gray, Jefinmenko, and other older out-of-print books about electric experiments and theory. I do see many untruths and myths about the approach of the so-called 'free energy' abound on the internet, but there are many good people performing worthy experiments to uncover the real truth about the energy that I do believe is all around us. I have not experimented with any circuits yet out of some doubt as to which way I want to proceed. I do have some ideas about things that I thought of that I have not seen anyone experiment with yet. I really don't want to get electrocuted to death because of not knowing enough, much less start an unexpected fire during some experiment gone bad. God has His spiritual influence on all we do in the natural, so keep up with your quest.
This is interesting. I just said last weekend to a some engineers on my team that I think 90% of the people in the free energy seeking and promoting community do not have it and are either almost there, mistaken in calculations or right out frauds. Most of the rest are at the basic level of one to one kind of unity systems, and very few get 10, 100, or 1000 times the output for input. Yes there are mostly untruths and myths. I am doing what I can to correct that. One of the things for example is to go after the Tesla Switch mistake people are making. I am setting the record straight in this matter. I'll do another video soon that will settle this once and for all. My goal is to save people time, money, and their faith. I have watched countless people get burned in all three of these things with such a misdirection. And yes people have also hurt themselves. So that is also a primary goal of mine, to keep people healthy. There needs to be some order to all this chaos around. There is too much information to sort through. This is on purpose. It is meant to overwhelm you so that you have no idea where to begin and also that you never complete anything. My goal was to give you something definite and yet people always had the tendency to miss the very basics in their looking for enormous outputs. There is a need for a whole new science as nothing seems to line up with reality in all the major theories. I am not the one to lead that but I am seeking for it to be done. There is a lot of work to be done to give direction and I will do what I can to help.
when I can. I will build one of these and use atmospheric voltage to power it. storing the energy, charging a lead alum battery bank, to make 220 home voltage for both poles in my breaker panel. and I being a ham radio operator. I'll use the DC stored to run my radio equipment.
been there, done that. While the voltage is there, the current is absolutely minute and you'll never get enough to power anything beyond a few micro watts. no to mention inefficienties in the battery and wires will eat the power up
Being a ham radio operator, I would think you have enough tech knowledge to know that this simply doesn't work. There is no free energy no matter what you do. Unless you live in some parallel universe where the physics laws are different from ours.
@@antiglobalist8229 I am being civilised. You simply can't harvest any usable energy from random RF radio waves no matter how civilised the answer. People who need renewable power cheaply should look at solar or wind power.
@@Ziplock9000 Sorry I sent a comment to the wrong address. Another commenter was upset by his uncivilized style. Sorry for the misunderstanding. As for performance, you are doing something wrong if it is not enough. I have seen, both personally and on footage, high-performance Bedini motor generators that operated dozens of electric lights and would be able to supply entire homes.
@@rickfriedrich I wonder if the meter shown with the bicycle wheel fan ( 4:40 ) is still in use? Mine from that time period still is and is of the same make & type. :-) Calibration of it was spot on when new and still is to this day. Mine was made in 2001.
Not sure what you are referring to. But at 12V input we can charge up to 300V on the charging side without any buck boost needed. The 12V input is not charging the output. It is only powering the motor. The charging comes from negative energy from the electron spin...
Reply to Chance Encounter skeptic: There would be nothing to enjoy about my videos or purpose on youtube if you what you are saying is true so please explain why you enjoy them. While there is a lot of confusion about free energy both with those who believe in it and with those who do not, the truth is that everyone now believes in free energy or excess energy, and it is just that many people like yourself only believe in certain forms and presumptuously claim that no other kinds exist. You accept that radiation from the sun is converted to useable energy obviously. 100 years ago you probably would have said that was impossible. Jumping directly to the matter, you admit that the Bedini motor actually did charge batteries. Well that is not some mistake about voltage x amperage. Take for example my simple free energy video series ruclips.net/video/KvQOAY0DwgI/видео.html I take a simple brushless fan that is found in every personal computer. Note that it requires a certain wattage to produce certain CFMs. Notice the three ways of changing the circuit to produce the same CFMs over the same time but with vastly different efficiencies: Example 1. I move around the diodes and now charge another battery while it is running. Now a second battery can charge up around 70% or more to the rate of the discharging battery of equal size (small batteries in this case). Example 2. Adding a fast gate driver to create a better square wave we can see this charging 100% of the input. Now considering that charging and loading batteries has a big loss involved, even at 70% you are already at double the energy out than in (so 100% is actually much more). Remember, the motor is still running producing the same CFMs as before and the input battery is still powering it, and only it. You are ignoring the fact that the second battery is in series (not parallel) with the first battery. So it cannot be charged from it at all. Any extra energy you get from this battery is free energy, even if it wasn't enough to continually swap the batteries. That is the problem with people who gave up with this tech when it didn't sustain rotation with small batteries and because of not following the instructions, you missed the fact that anything is better than nothing. But that was only the beginning if you listened to what we were saying and showing... Example three is the fan circuit is entirely replaced with the trigger coil option (or as mentioned and what we are doing now in the added mosfet gate driver). With this faster rate of change we can have much greater results which allows for larger battery banks to result in more total charged capacity over time as in the example I gave with 48V 2000AH batteries. It is true that in fact you are wrong in your ignoring what the Volts times Amps amounts to. So applying this to the fan. Example 4. With a gate driver added to the fan circuit and replacing a 12AH battery with those 48V 2000AH batteries now I can see over time hundreds of times more charging in that second bank over what I am drawing to power the little fan with a regular 12V 12AH battery. That may be an extreme example, but don't miss the fact that any charging in a second battery is free energy, just as any solar panel is. It doesn't matter how it is collected even though people don't want to admit there are other ways like this. The truth is people in America are not really desperate for energy as in other parts of the world. They couldn't be bothered to collect extra energy from their fans in this way. Years ago I won all the debates over free energy with all the sceptics. Eventually they conceded to these facts and demonstrations. It took me about 2 or 3 years to do that (from 2004 to 2006). At the end they changed the game/claim and demanded that they only accepted 3 times the output for the input. 2 times wasn't enough for them to be bothered with, because it was actually old news. Thousands of people all over the world had received my SSG kits and experienced 2 times the output. But for the skeptics that wasn't enough. Anyway, in your case you have not even realized that you have admitted to a significant gain. All you have to do is apply it to a brushless fan and you can see these very easy. And this is just the first very basic level. You can apply the process over and over again on the output. Remember the reactive energy is used here and is not useless or imaginary as is taught. We charge batteries or impulse transformers with it, or even drive other motors...
Hi Rick, good job and good luck on that quest. We all need to get out of misinformation spread around. Thx for Your work. Btw that link is connected to movie that is gone or it is for purpose to go to part 2 of it?
@@antiglobalist8229 . I am a globalist. You like 98% of humanity will die from PRION disease starvation or by human predation by 2030. I'll take my poverty certificate. Thank you. You can have your certificate of ignorance.
@@gingerbread1032 we all know it costs money to build. I don't think anyone disputes this fact. I fail to see the refute in your comment here. If you put in 1 and get 20 is that not progress? If you pay x amount of dollars and in 1 year you have saved that plus is that not progress?
I've built the Bedini Motor kit and it ruined a whole bank of batteries. Initially it appeared that the batteries were charging while delivering work, but after a number of cycles, the whole bank of batteries (brand new ones) just went bad. I would love to see a working demo or some instructions on how to build something that can deliver what John Bedini said his motors can do. Over the last almost 7 years that I've been following these contraptions, I've mostly seen scams after scams after scams with a few machines inbetween which I'm not sure about.
The only Bedini system that ruins batteries is the Tesla Switch and the battery chargers that he personally designed over the last few years. The SSG circuit does not ruin batteries. What you don't realize that the batteries are not ruined but changed to become negatively charged. This is the thing we have been trying to explain for years. A negatively charged battery has several characteristics opposite to positively charged batteries (which are normally how batteries are charged). A negatively charged battery for example will self-discharge a lot faster so for people who do not run a load on them soon enough they will wrongly evaluate their potential. The major difference is that the SSG system as Bedini promoted with his monopoles would NOT allow for batteries to be rotated around once they were negatively charged (which gradually happened over ten cycles or so). I solved this early on by adding the capacitor pulser system on the back end so that the negative energy transduced to a positive energy so that you could rotate batteries, and that has been primarily the way I ran these motors for years. I ran my 26' boat this way for three years just rotating the batteries around with the basic circuit. So the few people that say what you say above, just show exactly what we have been saying for years. There is a difference between the two types of charging and energies. The other factor is that people often did not understand their batteries or used junk batteries and didn't know it. So what is the benefit of negatively charged batteries over positively charged ones? Once changed over these batteries can charge faster and respond better than positively charged. This is why we called it conditioning. So here are the specifics ideally for that system. You charge one battery bank for a few minutes and let it rest a few minutes while you charge another battery (I'm probably the only one who has ever done such a thing like this and maximized the efficiency in this way by exploiting the rest periods). The battery continues to charge while in rest. Then you use the battery right away for any type of load other than powering the motor (which needs a positive charge to produce the negative energy, unless you add another process to do that as mentioned). The bigger the batteries the more charging takes place also. So with this kind of system you can get 100s of times the output with huge battery banks.
But as for there being scams, I agree, there are a lot on purpose. One reason is to actually make a fast buck, but another is to discredit the whole idea. The same thing happens in putting out so much seemingly useful information in a chaotic way that no one is able to figure out what to do or where to begin. So misinformation can come in different ways. What people are frustrated with Bedini over is that he played games with the people and dangled carrots on a string and made puzzles and mysteries and also didn't want to become irrelevant. He also never made anything practical. He never made an electric vehicle or powered his house or shop or made a generator or anything that everyone expected. I did those things and demonstrated the lawnmower, ceiling fans, cars and boats running in real life situations while John was a story teller. He always said not bother with doing such things. John also never saw the monopole as a motor but merely a mechanical oscillator. The only thing he really showed was the one with the big fan blade which demonstrated some mechanical. He actually was impressed with my first Lawnmower going through the 2007 Memorial parade in Palo Michigan. Bearden also was very excited about that. This was probably the first time he saw a serious mechanical load on that system. But it is true the SSG monopole has little torque and that is why I doubled the rotors with the dualpole, and I also improved on several other parts of it. But as for scams, yes beware of them everywhere.
Bedini's book is chaotic as well. If you have schematics on how to build a working SSG monopole as well as all the information in what batteries to use, when to apply load, etc, that would be awesome, I'd like to test it. I tried working through Tom Bearden's book to understand the concept of negative energy, but that's even more chaotic - Maxwell reformed equations that he calls Heaviside's truncated equations.
Yes I agree. What is first wrong with that book is the old book inside. John said back in his radio interview back in 1984 with Bearden that he only got that first system running once for a short time and couldn't do it again. So why put out a book about that and also not mention that in the book that it was unlikely to work for people? The patent in the book is actually fairly useful for those who work in this research but it is not something for people just beginning in this. The circuits and other information are very chaotic and not organized in a way to give people free energy as the title of the book would suggest. As for a beginning to end approach, that is very much needed. My series on Selfish Circuits or Loving Paths is a good beginning point. I will be doing 8 different major systems this next year, one or two of which will be a thorough open source where I propose a minimum 500W system for every home in the world... We are redoing the websites and will post many new things shortly. The SSG is good if you have large batteries and you understand the difference between positive and negative energy. I'll add to this response when I have a little more time.
Q: "That looks awfully complicated. What's it do?" A: "It drains one battery into another battery, with only a small loss." Q: "Okay, uh, why?" A: "To demonstrate how smart I am."
No it doesn't drain into the other battery. It produces two outputs for one input. The battery runs the motor and the second battery charges for free at the rate the other one discharges. So you get motor power and free charging.
I have built hundreds of these, and some with free parts. What is more economically feasible than taking millions of brushless fans, like in the back of your computer, and just moving around the diodes so you can now also charge a battery?!?!
Anyone at all familiar with "this stuff" knows that it works. If you bother to look at the details you can see that. See my video on modifying a brushless fan where I show you by just changing out the diodes you can run the fan the same way with the same power and speed and then charge a second battery at the same time. What part of that doesn't work Walter? Thousands of people have done this for years all around the world. This was an opensourse project so people are doing this on their own. As for why more people don't do it you have to ask yourself why more people don't do alternative energy in general. People just don't get around to it and it is too much trouble to do something differrent. As for millionaires, some people have become just that. That is not my object. I'm just trying to help people.
I wish people would take a moment and look at the earth. North and South poles. Always moving. We live in the power that's all around us all the time. I appreciate your time and work with this video which shows the exchange of knowledge. God bless
I love John Bedini's works
This is for the chance encounter guy who just posted: Just like so many people, you never listened to the instructions. The purpose of the machine was a mechanical oscillator for pumping negative energy. As such you can produce enormous amounts of energy if you understand what you are dealing with. I have shown for years that you can in fact charge up many more batteries than what was input into the system. Or run many other loads. It was never meant to charge up little batteries or power little loads. Once you realize that then you will see how mistaken you have been. Years ago I did such a test. I ran my little 3 pole kit that I made, which thousands of people have all over the world. I charged up one little battery at the same rate as the other little battery discharged. So far this is all you understood about this setup. That was just the very basic beginning to see that I was doing something for free as the one battery was not actually charging, and could not actually charge the other battery. Anyway, then I replaced the 12AH 12V charging battery with a 2000AH 48V battery bank. And guess what happened? It resulted in over 200 times more useable energy than previous in the 12AH battery over the same amount of time. Of course that was a COP of 200. This was not new to me as I had done smaller experiments. But guess what, that was just the very basic setup. I have shown over the years many other ways to use that simple system to produce extra energy than what people expected.
Bedini never expected this system to be a motor, but I showed him any everyone that it could be used as such with a little improvement. Of course Bedini didn't invent this system at all as it predates him over 25 years as I have shown. The processes are not confined to this motor or motors at all as I have shown. But setup, even with it's limitations has great potential and needs to be respected. I hope you take the time to actually learn more of the real potential of these kinds of systems rather than just mock things out of ignorance.
hello, I built a bedinie wheel with 6 windings with 4 transistors each and a trigger. Could we add 3 additional windings to 7 transistors for the same trigger? Thank you
We always just had one winding per transistor so not sure why you would not do that.
What a beautiful collection they had. 👍👍
Hello,could we increase the speed of the wheel by putting more coil thank you
I have a Bedini wheel that I just started using. Are you saying the SG will damage batteries?
No.
In the end , a system like yours would be"The Dream" for me!👍👍I made a small 2 coil system of a 28 gauge and 20 gauge bifilar coil and my results are"ok", it works but like Tim the Toolman...I want more power! I need to know what is more important...gauge or turns when making a bifilar coil? I have an abundance of magnet wire in 28, 20, 18,16 and 12 gauge. Would a coil of 20/16 @ 200 turns be more/less productive than a coil of 28/16@500 turns? What about 100 turns of 18/12 gauge...any advice would be greatly appreciated! Thanks
That's like asking are squares better than circles or apples better than oranges. Different coils have different purposes. It depends on what you want to do and what voltages you want to run. There are too many factors and considerations for someone else to figure out what someone wants to do. This is why I don't prefer to get into trying to figure out what someone wants to do with their own parts. I provide parts for specific purposes. I teach on these important themes and give information and basic demonstration on how to do these various things.
There are no magical numbers with these coils. There are better and worse materials, higher or lower Q, resonance or out of resonance, etc. But wire gauge and turns is a voltage/amperage deal. Here is an example. Before my first big Resonance Convention in 2010 Bedini used thousands of dollars of my wire to make very large coils. I asked him politely what he was planning to do with it when adding it to the 13" Ferris wheel I was assembling for my meeting. I realized he was making a big costly mistake but wasn't about to embarrass him about it. I realized in that example that he really didn't know what he was doing on this basic level. I mean, if you have 90 pounds of #18 wire (which was divided into several wire lengths) then you need fairly high voltage to drive that coil. And that is what happened. He spent two weeks trying to figure out a way to use those coils and couldn't come up with anything. He ended up running the several big coils at 36V and it didn't do any better than my one little coil running at 12V 1W. Of course hundreds of people at the meeting (and later thousands of people who watched the videos) were enchanted by his words for no good reason.
Does bedini motor reverse polarity while working
Bonjour, Pourrait-on augmenter la vitesse de la roue en mettant plus de bobines merci
instead of using batteries i.e 12v can you use 110v/240v from the grid and put the electricty back into the grid???
Great idea, who would have thought. Yes, that is the idea. Batteries are just an easy way of doing this at the basic level.
Rick Friedrich i was asking a question as i am researching about all of this....
I built a Bedini motor iIgot 13 V out for 1V in. IT Does Work.
That doesn't mean anything unless you specify how many amps in and out that you had.
@@rgolliff1 Measuring only the voltage is how the scam works. The only honest measurement in this industry is an integrating wattmeter. The world is still waiting for a Bedini video that shows one.
I've seen the whole documentary on this and understand the concept but not the details..
What level of electrical engineering do I need to learn before I can understand and build something like this?
I want to learn how to use the permanent magnets in order to turn the wheel and how to build a dynamo to capture the energy.
All these things are made to look fairly simple by john bedini. And also people like elon musk with his tesla motor etc. But where to start?
We have many of these kits that are much improved on our R-Charge.com website. There is very little to know besides the basics of working with batteries. You don't have to understand what the specific parts are to build and use these systems. Our 4 Dualpole kits have their own generator coils added to the system.
As for John, he didn't invent this at all. The basic School Girl system goes back at least to a 1974 patent that you see in the top spinner. The monopole goes back at least to Robert Adams, but also before him. Charging batteries with BEMF also goes way back. Tesla Motors does not use this kind of technology.
I hope this helps.
Thank's to you Rick. Even I am not yet able to figure out how it works. Is Bemf so huge so that it can charge any batteries?
See my other videos as this video does not cover the how. It is not BEMF. The exact nature of the energy will always be uncertain, but the process can be replicated.
@@rickfriedrich stop these fast close ups cant get chance to absorb what i am looking at please.
This was a private video that I gifted to everyone years later. So stop complaining. I didn't have an opportunity to do otherwise.
Can you explain more detail with schematic diagram?
Yeah, look at my other videos. This was rare footage that I filmed in 2005.
Nice video of some history made. I am still researching, and have watched your series on loving circuits, I have read much about Tesla and his findings, and still want to understand the energy that he was able to get a small glimpse of in Colorado. There are others that I have read, like Steinmetz, Moray, Gray, Jefinmenko, and other older out-of-print books about electric experiments and theory. I do see many untruths and myths about the approach of the so-called 'free energy' abound on the internet, but there are many good people performing worthy experiments to uncover the real truth about the energy that I do believe is all around us. I have not experimented with any circuits yet out of some doubt as to which way I want to proceed. I do have some ideas about things that I thought of that I have not seen anyone experiment with yet. I really don't want to get electrocuted to death because of not knowing enough, much less start an unexpected fire during some experiment gone bad. God has His spiritual influence on all we do in the natural, so keep up with your quest.
This is interesting. I just said last weekend to a some engineers on my team that I think 90% of the people in the free energy seeking and promoting community do not have it and are either almost there, mistaken in calculations or right out frauds. Most of the rest are at the basic level of one to one kind of unity systems, and very few get 10, 100, or 1000 times the output for input. Yes there are mostly untruths and myths. I am doing what I can to correct that. One of the things for example is to go after the Tesla Switch mistake people are making. I am setting the record straight in this matter. I'll do another video soon that will settle this once and for all. My goal is to save people time, money, and their faith. I have watched countless people get burned in all three of these things with such a misdirection. And yes people have also hurt themselves. So that is also a primary goal of mine, to keep people healthy. There needs to be some order to all this chaos around. There is too much information to sort through. This is on purpose. It is meant to overwhelm you so that you have no idea where to begin and also that you never complete anything. My goal was to give you something definite and yet people always had the tendency to miss the very basics in their looking for enormous outputs. There is a need for a whole new science as nothing seems to line up with reality in all the major theories. I am not the one to lead that but I am seeking for it to be done. There is a lot of work to be done to give direction and I will do what I can to help.
@@rickfriedrich that's lovely of you sir. Thanks for the hard work
when I can. I will build one of these and use atmospheric voltage to power it. storing the energy, charging a lead alum battery bank, to make 220 home voltage for both poles in my breaker panel. and I being a ham radio operator. I'll use the DC stored to run my radio equipment.
been there, done that. While the voltage is there, the current is absolutely minute and you'll never get enough to power anything beyond a few micro watts. no to mention inefficienties in the battery and wires will eat the power up
Being a ham radio operator, I would think you have enough tech knowledge to know that this simply doesn't work. There is no free energy no matter what you do. Unless you live in some parallel universe where the physics laws are different from ours.
@@Ziplock9000 Can't you manifest in civilized manners? Your style will issue a poverty certificate for you, congratulations.
@@antiglobalist8229 I am being civilised. You simply can't harvest any usable energy from random RF radio waves no matter how civilised the answer. People who need renewable power cheaply should look at solar or wind power.
@@Ziplock9000 Sorry I sent a comment to the wrong address. Another commenter was upset by his uncivilized style. Sorry for the misunderstanding. As for performance, you are doing something wrong if it is not enough. I have seen, both personally and on footage, high-performance Bedini motor generators that operated dozens of electric lights and would be able to supply entire homes.
Olá Amigo gosto muito do seu canal,este vídeo foi muito importante
i cant what to see what power is made and use. if the motor has carbon nano transistor.
thanks for your time in this video.
Hi Sir how much value of 6 coil energizer machine registration or plz sand circuit schematic.
This is old video. These are not for sale. The ones for sale are on R-charge.com website.
@@rickfriedrich I wonder if the meter shown with the bicycle wheel fan ( 4:40 ) is still in use? Mine from that time period still is and is of the same make & type. :-) Calibration of it was spot on when new and still is to this day. Mine was made in 2001.
i made one of these almost 10 years ago from a bicycle wheel
Me too. Probably about 200 different variations.
Nice experiment. However 12v isn't enough to charge the batteries. Add a buck circuit and bring it up to about 14v where it should be.
Not sure what you are referring to. But at 12V input we can charge up to 300V on the charging side without any buck boost needed. The 12V input is not charging the output. It is only powering the motor. The charging comes from negative energy from the electron spin...
Reply to Chance Encounter skeptic: There would be nothing to enjoy about my videos or purpose on youtube if you what you are saying is true so please explain why you enjoy them. While there is a lot of confusion about free energy both with those who believe in it and with those who do not, the truth is that everyone now believes in free energy or excess energy, and it is just that many people like yourself only believe in certain forms and presumptuously claim that no other kinds exist. You accept that radiation from the sun is converted to useable energy obviously. 100 years ago you probably would have said that was impossible. Jumping directly to the matter, you admit that the Bedini motor actually did charge batteries. Well that is not some mistake about voltage x amperage. Take for example my simple free energy video series ruclips.net/video/KvQOAY0DwgI/видео.html
I take a simple brushless fan that is found in every personal computer. Note that it requires a certain wattage to produce certain CFMs. Notice the three ways of changing the circuit to produce the same CFMs over the same time but with vastly different efficiencies: Example 1. I move around the diodes and now charge another battery while it is running. Now a second battery can charge up around 70% or more to the rate of the discharging battery of equal size (small batteries in this case).
Example 2. Adding a fast gate driver to create a better square wave we can see this charging 100% of the input. Now considering that charging and loading batteries has a big loss involved, even at 70% you are already at double the energy out than in (so 100% is actually much more). Remember, the motor is still running producing the same CFMs as before and the input battery is still powering it, and only it. You are ignoring the fact that the second battery is in series (not parallel) with the first battery. So it cannot be charged from it at all. Any extra energy you get from this battery is free energy, even if it wasn't enough to continually swap the batteries. That is the problem with people who gave up with this tech when it didn't sustain rotation with small batteries and because of not following the instructions, you missed the fact that anything is better than nothing. But that was only the beginning if you listened to what we were saying and showing...
Example three is the fan circuit is entirely replaced with the trigger coil option (or as mentioned and what we are doing now in the added mosfet gate driver). With this faster rate of change we can have much greater results which allows for larger battery banks to result in more total charged capacity over time as in the example I gave with 48V 2000AH batteries. It is true that in fact you are wrong in your ignoring what the Volts times Amps amounts to. So applying this to the fan.
Example 4. With a gate driver added to the fan circuit and replacing a 12AH battery with those 48V 2000AH batteries now I can see over time hundreds of times more charging in that second bank over what I am drawing to power the little fan with a regular 12V 12AH battery. That may be an extreme example, but don't miss the fact that any charging in a second battery is free energy, just as any solar panel is. It doesn't matter how it is collected even though people don't want to admit there are other ways like this.
The truth is people in America are not really desperate for energy as in other parts of the world. They couldn't be bothered to collect extra energy from their fans in this way. Years ago I won all the debates over free energy with all the sceptics. Eventually they conceded to these facts and demonstrations. It took me about 2 or 3 years to do that (from 2004 to 2006). At the end they changed the game/claim and demanded that they only accepted 3 times the output for the input. 2 times wasn't enough for them to be bothered with, because it was actually old news. Thousands of people all over the world had received my SSG kits and experienced 2 times the output. But for the skeptics that wasn't enough. Anyway, in your case you have not even realized that you have admitted to a significant gain. All you have to do is apply it to a brushless fan and you can see these very easy. And this is just the first very basic level. You can apply the process over and over again on the output. Remember the reactive energy is used here and is not useless or imaginary as is taught. We charge batteries or impulse transformers with it, or even drive other motors...
Rick Friedrich
you long winded dip shit.
Energy is only free to use after cost to build or buy a perpetual energy pump.
Hi Rick, good job and good luck on that quest. We all need to get out of misinformation spread around. Thx for Your work. Btw that link is connected to movie that is gone or it is for purpose to go to part 2 of it?
@@gingerbread1032 Can't you manifest in civilized manners? Your style will issue a poverty certificate for you, congratulations.
@@antiglobalist8229 .
I am a globalist.
You like 98% of humanity will die from PRION disease starvation or by human predation by 2030.
I'll take my poverty certificate. Thank you.
You can have your certificate of ignorance.
@@gingerbread1032 we all know it costs money to build. I don't think anyone disputes this fact. I fail to see the refute in your comment here. If you put in 1 and get 20 is that not progress? If you pay x amount of dollars and in 1 year you have saved that plus is that not progress?
Simple and smart. Thanks
i just dont know , all see is pictures of apparatus but no explanation or instruction tnx!
I've built the Bedini Motor kit and it ruined a whole bank of batteries.
Initially it appeared that the batteries were charging while delivering work, but after a number of cycles, the whole bank of batteries (brand new ones) just went bad.
I would love to see a working demo or some instructions on how to build something that can deliver what John Bedini said his motors can do. Over the last almost 7 years that I've been following these contraptions, I've mostly seen scams after scams after scams with a few machines inbetween which I'm not sure about.
The only Bedini system that ruins batteries is the Tesla Switch and the battery chargers that he personally designed over the last few years. The SSG circuit does not ruin batteries. What you don't realize that the batteries are not ruined but changed to become negatively charged. This is the thing we have been trying to explain for years. A negatively charged battery has several characteristics opposite to positively charged batteries (which are normally how batteries are charged). A negatively charged battery for example will self-discharge a lot faster so for people who do not run a load on them soon enough they will wrongly evaluate their potential. The major difference is that the SSG system as Bedini promoted with his monopoles would NOT allow for batteries to be rotated around once they were negatively charged (which gradually happened over ten cycles or so). I solved this early on by adding the capacitor pulser system on the back end so that the negative energy transduced to a positive energy so that you could rotate batteries, and that has been primarily the way I ran these motors for years. I ran my 26' boat this way for three years just rotating the batteries around with the basic circuit. So the few people that say what you say above, just show exactly what we have been saying for years. There is a difference between the two types of charging and energies. The other factor is that people often did not understand their batteries or used junk batteries and didn't know it. So what is the benefit of negatively charged batteries over positively charged ones? Once changed over these batteries can charge faster and respond better than positively charged. This is why we called it conditioning. So here are the specifics ideally for that system. You charge one battery bank for a few minutes and let it rest a few minutes while you charge another battery (I'm probably the only one who has ever done such a thing like this and maximized the efficiency in this way by exploiting the rest periods). The battery continues to charge while in rest. Then you use the battery right away for any type of load other than powering the motor (which needs a positive charge to produce the negative energy, unless you add another process to do that as mentioned). The bigger the batteries the more charging takes place also. So with this kind of system you can get 100s of times the output with huge battery banks.
But as for there being scams, I agree, there are a lot on purpose. One reason is to actually make a fast buck, but another is to discredit the whole idea. The same thing happens in putting out so much seemingly useful information in a chaotic way that no one is able to figure out what to do or where to begin. So misinformation can come in different ways. What people are frustrated with Bedini over is that he played games with the people and dangled carrots on a string and made puzzles and mysteries and also didn't want to become irrelevant. He also never made anything practical. He never made an electric vehicle or powered his house or shop or made a generator or anything that everyone expected. I did those things and demonstrated the lawnmower, ceiling fans, cars and boats running in real life situations while John was a story teller. He always said not bother with doing such things. John also never saw the monopole as a motor but merely a mechanical oscillator. The only thing he really showed was the one with the big fan blade which demonstrated some mechanical. He actually was impressed with my first Lawnmower going through the 2007 Memorial parade in Palo Michigan. Bearden also was very excited about that. This was probably the first time he saw a serious mechanical load on that system. But it is true the SSG monopole has little torque and that is why I doubled the rotors with the dualpole, and I also improved on several other parts of it. But as for scams, yes beware of them everywhere.
Bedini's book is chaotic as well. If you have schematics on how to build a working SSG monopole as well as all the information in what batteries to use, when to apply load, etc, that would be awesome, I'd like to test it.
I tried working through Tom Bearden's book to understand the concept of negative energy, but that's even more chaotic - Maxwell reformed equations that he calls Heaviside's truncated equations.
Yes I agree. What is first wrong with that book is the old book inside. John said back in his radio interview back in 1984 with Bearden that he only got that first system running once for a short time and couldn't do it again. So why put out a book about that and also not mention that in the book that it was unlikely to work for people? The patent in the book is actually fairly useful for those who work in this research but it is not something for people just beginning in this. The circuits and other information are very chaotic and not organized in a way to give people free energy as the title of the book would suggest.
As for a beginning to end approach, that is very much needed. My series on Selfish Circuits or Loving Paths is a good beginning point. I will be doing 8 different major systems this next year, one or two of which will be a thorough open source where I propose a minimum 500W system for every home in the world... We are redoing the websites and will post many new things shortly. The SSG is good if you have large batteries and you understand the difference between positive and negative energy. I'll add to this response when I have a little more time.
@@rickfriedrich thanks for sharing on RUclips. May we connect, augustineteo68@gmail.com
Writing from S’pore
Q: "That looks awfully complicated. What's it do?"
A: "It drains one battery into another battery, with only a small loss."
Q: "Okay, uh, why?"
A: "To demonstrate how smart I am."
No it doesn't drain into the other battery. It produces two outputs for one input. The battery runs the motor and the second battery charges for free at the rate the other one discharges. So you get motor power and free charging.
@@rickfriedrich So, build a water heater out of it, and become instantly rich and famous.
We also do that with the motors to make three outputs for one input. More than that as well...
@@rickfriedrich Build a water heater then. I'll be your first customer, my water heater is electric and the bills are killing me.
We are actually making a product right now for water heaters that cuts the electric in half.
By really working, I mean economically feasible
I have built hundreds of these, and some with free parts. What is more economically feasible than taking millions of brushless fans, like in the back of your computer, and just moving around the diodes so you can now also charge a battery?!?!
👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿
Good👍👍👍
My friend Dave worked with John . Dave Came away with no special knowledge, devices.
When was that?
your fired camera
? This was old video footage for personal use so don't blame the camera. lol
Thanks ... Verry inspire ...
If any of this stuff actually worked all of you guys would millionaires. What happened?
Anyone at all familiar with "this stuff" knows that it works. If you bother to look at the details you can see that. See my video on modifying a brushless fan where I show you by just changing out the diodes you can run the fan the same way with the same power and speed and then charge a second battery at the same time. What part of that doesn't work Walter? Thousands of people have done this for years all around the world. This was an opensourse project so people are doing this on their own. As for why more people don't do it you have to ask yourself why more people don't do alternative energy in general. People just don't get around to it and it is too much trouble to do something differrent. As for millionaires, some people have become just that. That is not my object. I'm just trying to help people.