So, an interesting discussion all around concerning the biometrics topic. I found that it was missing some context in the discussion however, where no one mentioned that there are already other national protective laws under HIPAA; and there really needs to be correlation related to how that applies as well, and where the cross-over might exist. The CO state law takes inclusive steps to couple biometrics under state privacy laws (in the absence of an overall, cohesive national set), but I'm curious where the thought was that gaps existed in HIPAA that needed this type of additional regulation. Regardless of knowing about this law, this concept has led to some interesting group discussions lately. Are hosted data centers now, or going to be, responsible for providing HIPAA related audit data, in addition to SOC 1/2, as part of the reporting to their clients? Biometrics are a huge part of their security controls and they have lots of client data.
Shecky bringing the real talk at 23:00 great points sir!
32:38 I believe you were talking about codespaces
So, an interesting discussion all around concerning the biometrics topic. I found that it was missing some context in the discussion however, where no one mentioned that there are already other national protective laws under HIPAA; and there really needs to be correlation related to how that applies as well, and where the cross-over might exist. The CO state law takes inclusive steps to couple biometrics under state privacy laws (in the absence of an overall, cohesive national set), but I'm curious where the thought was that gaps existed in HIPAA that needed this type of additional regulation. Regardless of knowing about this law, this concept has led to some interesting group discussions lately. Are hosted data centers now, or going to be, responsible for providing HIPAA related audit data, in addition to SOC 1/2, as part of the reporting to their clients? Biometrics are a huge part of their security controls and they have lots of client data.