War in South-East Ukraine February 2022 - March 2023
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- Check out ground.news/ea... to stay informed on breaking news as it’s happening around the world, compare coverage, and know where your news is coming from.
This video maps out the front line movement in Central Donbas from February 2022 to March 2023. It covers the battles of Popasna, the battle Lysychansk-Severodonetsk, the Russian advance from Svitlodarsk to Bakhmut, the Ukrainian counteroffensive and the second battle of Lyman. It finishes halfway during the battle of Bakhmut.
Front line positions: deepstatemap.l...
Music:
Crisis - Scoring Action by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommon...
Source: incompetech.com...
Artist: incompetech.com/
Black Vortex - Scoring Action by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommon...
Source: incompetech.com...
Artist: incompetech.com/
BTS Prolog by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommon...
Source: freepd.com/Uncl...
Artist: incompetech.com/
Check out ground.news/eastory to stay informed on breaking news as it’s happening around the world, compare coverage, and know where your news is coming from.
Ok
Ok 👌
Man I was chewing my fingernails for this one! THANK YOU EA
thanks
Hi
0:29 you have my biggest respect for including the "I'm just a youtuber" part, I've seen it way too often that certain youtubers present a topic as if they did all the research and when it's pointed out in the comments that they're wrong (even with sources included) they either ignore it or get angry at the comment.
"What do you mean parroting Deutsche Welle does not make me a journalist"
Dumb comment. There are plenty of quality channels that do actual research like Covert Cabal and Perun. Lazer pig has actual sources he uses for his videos. Not everyone regurgitates news sites.
As a wise man once said
"I'm only human after all"
‘All the research’ they talk as if they were god watching from the clouds and reading everyone’s mind
0x340bdb2D1eCCC94c09be2aafcb0D50b3bA99eB19 (ETH wallet - Collecting money for drones for Ukraine)
Such a great video. Not biased and well put.
You should also do a video on Yugoslavia in WW2. Generally a short invasion to cover as the main gains had taken place in the first 3 days.
he did that in his ww2 mediteranian war 1940-1941
@@ckhpersonal670 Just checked, I missed that part. Thanks
Belgrade in 3 days
The invasion was short, but then there were the Partisans
you mean when the Germans took Yugoslavia, the Yugoslavian rersistance or when they helped Russia win the war 1944-1945.
Best war map I have seen so far on this conflict. Thank you!
Jomini the west
Well, looks like you haven't seen much.
Weebunion and Defense politics asia, best maps out of everyone
An incredibly well detailed and well thought out analysis video. I especially appreciate that you admit that details are fuzzy and that some assumptions may be wrong, not enough people on the internet have that level of honesty and integrity. Kudos to you!
I love that this is unbiased. You are definitely one of the most dedicated channels on RUclips.
It seems to you that the video is not biased because you often see much more biased videos. As for this video, watching it from Russia, I see that it is still biased. "The truth is the first thing that dies in war" is a very fair statement.
@@johnny_t. what parts of it? I sincerely want to know. Btw I look at Pro Russian Sources as well as Pro Ukrainian ones. I saw no problems as far as I know.
Just want to have a debate
@@HH-pm6mj +1 to that. Its not like K&G which takes every second moment to remind people that the Russians are bad guys and its not like Douglas Macgregor who was claiming tha the entire Ukrainian army had died in April 2022.
I find that there is so much "The Russians will collapse in a month" and "Ukraine will fall apart any day now" that's been going on for over a year that both sides think the phrase "this war will take a long time" is somehow a bias statement.
Whatever I write to you, it will cause controversy among other people. And I don't want to argue with anyone. I believe that finding out who is more right and who is less only supports this conflict. It seems to me that it is better to focus on the reasons why it needs to be completed. Even if I agreed, any of my comments on this video would not be short. The analysis of some phrases that the author of the video uttered in 20 seconds will turn into very long texts if you give explanations that are obvious in Russia, but not obvious in other countries. Let's limit ourselves to 14:35, the Russian army had no problems with conscription of men. Men were simply not called up. Those who really wanted to go themselves had such an opportunity by signing a contract for 6 months. By the way, are you familiar with the video at 14:40? The author for some reason did not show the ending. Of course, I may be wrong, but in it, by chance, the Ukrainian military does not shoot at a surrendered Russian lying on the ground? And before that, would they by any chance pick up a rifle lying next to this surrendered Russian?
@@johnny_t. If you're not willing to defend your point then why talk at all? Just shut up and sit in a corner, don't couch your arguments with "I don't wana elaborate because you'll be mad at me" right after disagreeing with someone.
14:35 Eastory says they had an ENLISTMENT issue not a conscription issue, IDK if you're ESL but those are very different things. He says later in the video that Russian mobilization/conscription allowed them to refill their frontline and solve their numerical issues.
14:40 is a video of a bunch of dudes sitting around with RPG rockets. I am not familiar with the entire video but you would have to have serious brain rot to think that Eastory is going to show an execution on his monetized youtube channel.
Unironically this video helped me understand basic military strategy on the local level. Amazing
Logistics, logistics and high ground. Yes you passed modern tactics 101
@@Dayvit78 Logistics are generally above the tactical level. More like operations and strategy 101
Terrain is definitely a tactical concern tho.
@@Dayvit78 "logistics high ground tactics"
These words mostly do not mean what you seem to think they mean.
12:32 You’re the first channel that integrates an ad in a non-intrusive and actually useful way 💯
I've been your fan since your video 1941.
Your channel is amazing.
1941? ive been his fan since 1939!
@@ckhpersonal670 nice
I’ve been his air conditioner since 1985
Just opened RUclips and saw this and this fricking made my day, I love these videos especially on modern wars
Awesome video! A bit strange decision to use the lightly colored gradient to indicate higher height, as most elevation maps we see do the opposite and concentrate the color on mountains and peeks. At least for me it was bugging my brain to stop visualizing the terrain backwards. But anyways, again big ups for creating this video, don't stop doing what you're doing \m/
True! I read the map wrong and should have returned the video 10 seconds
I liked it. The higher you go the lighter it gets. Sorta like real life. But yeah, I know it runs reverse to what we're accustomed to.
Love the geographic and logistical emphasis of the video
I really like how the videos are progressively getting more professional in editing. Been here since quite a while ago, I'm happy for all your improvements.
Fascinating stuff. It's great seeing so much content on current conflict given its relevance
I found it very weird how little coverage was dedicated to Popasna when the battle was raging in the town. Early summer it seemed like Ukrainians planned defense of Donbas anchored on Donets river and 2014 contact line fortifications. All future Russian advances near Lysychansk and later Bakhmut stem from the breakthorugh at Popasna, but very little coverage is available of what exactly happend there.
Thats because ukrainain media doesnt share ukrianian defeats. for obvious reasons, to keep morale higher and avoid doomers
From what I've gathered, so much arty that the Ukrainian lines just dissappeared. In a few interviews with separate guys defending Bakhmut, they all mention that the shelling is less than what got dropped on Popasna. From a casualty perspective, likely fairly light on kia but many many wia. Shell shock is a very real thing
Nothing extraordinary happened there. It's just that, with increasing pressure, there comes a moment when some point does not stand up. There would be no Popasna, there would be a breakthrough in another place. The breakthrough was not unexpected, it was expected. Only the breakthrough point was unknown. And when Popasnaya defense only faltered, the pressure on her immediately increased. The units that were ready for a breakthrough came up to her. And that's when the assault began. Artillery, bomb and missile strikes. All this has increased significantly. And the forces of the assault turned out to be enough to expand and deepen the breakthrough so much that the APU could not do anything about it.
@@Franfran2424 Друг бои за попасную шли 3 месяца там бойцы держались как могли. Старые политиканы и ЛГБТ идиоты с запад тянули с помощью когда она была так нужна из этого вытек снарядный голод
I don't know if its a "widely used" nickname or not, but I've heard the breakthrough does have significance to those that follow the war day by day. I believe some call it the "Popasna Flower" due to the resulting action after the breakthrough in the area looking like a flower, aka troop movements pouring out in every direction from Popasna.
Thank you for this overall summary of how the Russo-Ukrainian War has gone, so far. Keep up the good work!
This isn’t a war, this is special operation, if russian start war, noone will survive, they have not begin yet to fight seriously
@@mappingtheshit Выздоравливай
@@mappingtheshit of course, no one will survive (specifically talking about the russian army)
The unbiased narration is what I like most about this Channel.
Incredible - very well explained and engaging. Shame it ends on a cliffhanger!
А можно ссылку на карту урбанизации? Мне пригодится такая
The Blyatkrieg = you advance 25km in 4 months, then lose 100x more on the flanks in 2 weeks.
Bachmut was taken using only shovels and Ukraine won the counteroffensive and took Crimea?
At the beginning of the war, the Russian army had the same number of men as the Ukrainian army. The information on losses is contradictory, even in the Western media, but the author adheres to the version that Russia has more losses than Ukraine only because the Russians are attacking, but forgets that the Ukrainians are also attacking in many parts of the front. The Ukrainians were able to mount a successful counter-offensive because they had an overwhelming numerical advantage when they started, thanks to forced mobilisation. And of course not a word about the losses incurred in the process. And the weaknesses in the Russian defence were not because of losses, but because from the beginning the Russian command did not calculate the forces. 200,000 men were too few to hold such a long front line. And the credibility rating of the media, which is loyal to the White House on all key issues, says nothing.
"Russia has more losses than Ukraine only because the Russians are attacking" and also because this is directly derived from the equipment losses and russians' constant seething about it.
"The Donbas Industrial Area". I didn't really get just how urbanized this area was. The amount cities and towns present in this area is staggering.
more than 90% of the urban population, but mostly these are sovov slums, in which it is inconvenient to live
Ukraine has been using artillery against it for almost a decade
Love this coverage of the war. It’s been difficult to get a good perspective on the bigger picture, and this helped that. Appreciate the content and effort behind it.
From the very start you got your info wrong. Russians were outnumbered 3 to 1 for an entire year. Only recent months it became something like 1,3 to 1 still in favor of Ukraine. Only in number of equipment Russian have more numbers, but as you said the defensive advantage gives Ukraine the edge again. It's not only defensive advantage but 8 years of building bunkers, tunnels, underground fortresses, etc...
Overall they are outnumbered but they aren't necessarily outnumbered on the front. Ukraine has to station troops everywhere to defend multiple locations across the country while Russia can stick all their troops on the front
@@a.t6066 Then that means Ukraine doesn't have to station troops all around if there are no enemy troops in that location.
@@eliasziad7864 🤦♂️
@@eliasziad7864 are you a child or are you from NCD...?
@@a.t6066 A child.
I love this channel, good work man. wonderful.
Thank you for not being biased as the other youtubers
Great analysis. The most detailed and unbiased narrative of the war I've seen yet.
Good job. You’re putting together the 2nd draft of history. As time goes on we’ll learn more and more. Thank you for the contribution.
would love to see this style but with the siege of Mariupol
Up
I think the only problem is the details are very fuzzy surrounding it. There’s not many who can really say what happened.
Damn, that was a amazing. I haven't been following the details of the fighting and this vid has given a perfect overview. Thank you!
Great job pronouncing the names of the various towns and villages. Yet another example of your effort to convey accuracy.
You should add a scale to the side of the video, it's hard being unfamiliar with specific terrain to understand the size of areas in the video. Love your vids :)
Russia isn’t in an ammunition shortage, it’s supply like railroads were destroyed and needed to be rebuilt
Man this was really excellent. Thank you for that.
About retreat from Hirske-Zolote - i do not have sources at hand, but it was actually partially encircled when retreat began, and many Ukranian units had to retreat through the gaps in Russian encircling units (solid front wasn't yet established). This was often done by small groups of infantry. And quite a lot got captured. So, Ukrainians lost many men and many of their withdrawn units were fragmented and in chaos.
The info that quite a lot got captured was mostly from russian sources, and wasn't backed up by photos of ukrainian captured (it is pretty safe to assume that russians would brag about such captures with photos of groups that they captured).
It is true that the reatreat was done by small groups of troops, but there are no evidence that there were many captures.
Additionaly there was hypothesis that a major part of ukrainian troops retreated before partrial encirclement, and only rearguard remained to retreat after partial enciclement.
@@jerzyjj4 i also heard the rearguard story the most, i heard maybe 50 or so rearguard troops were captured but i could be wrong
Most men actually were able to escape but they couldn't take their heavy equipment with them. Quite a lot of vehicles were lost in the chaotic retreat and the units were so disorganized that they couldn't establish a coherent defense of the refinery which was one of the best defensive positions in the area
@@jerzyjj4 but it coinsides with sudden collapse of lysichansk oil refinery.
The retreat was definately not good and it did cause chaos.
@@theepashmani6474 Yeah, precisely. It could definitely be that the Ukrainians could withdraw, but could not organize the units from Zolote-Hirske in time, so they had to draw on units from Lysychansk and the area west of it. They managed to succeed in this endeavor however, and the Russian advance was stopped long enough that they could evacuate Lysychansk-Sievierodonetsk.
That's what I think
No ammo shortige , shovels doin great job.
Russian Final Boss of Bachmut:
m.ruclips.net/video/LxxXw83ifaU/видео.html&pp=ygUPU2hvdmVsIHRocm93aW5n
It's still hard for me to understand what exactly happened in Soledar. According to some guys from the 93rd Brigade of UAF, they were feeling pretty confident and were very successful in their defence of Siledar, but after the rotation and being replaced with the 46th Airmobile Brigade, things started going downhill. At first I believed that this was just a coincidence explained by other factors, but later one of the 46th Airmobile Brigade commanders was complaining about being given soldiers with very weak training which makes me believe that the replacement of the 93rd for the 46th might have been more significant in the Soledar troubles.
It's because VDV paratroopers made a dash towards the city from Yakolivka, destroyed parts of their artillery, and paved the way for Wagner to take the city.
46th has essentially been rebuilt. poorly.
93rd was still relatively untouched. I dont think they will be since they seem to be getting grinded down in bakhmt
The idea here was probably to save combat proven 93rd relatively untouched, so they could jump elsewhere if needed to be the firefighters or to save them for the coming counteroffensive. The 46th was just a filler considered enough to hold out in soledar, but battlefield verified those assumptions
Probably the fall of Yakovlivka strategic position.
A lot depends on whether an assault is underway, or you are under disturbing artillery fire and reconnaissance combat. It depends on what forces the assault is carried out. They could well believe that they had been stormed all this time. And that they were holding up well. They were shelled, they tried to knock them out of distant defense nodes. But their trouble was that it wasn't really an attack. It was preparation for the assault. Their fortifications and artillery positions were identified. When the assault began, the density of artillery fire increased significantly. Aviation joined the case. And their positions were already known by that time.
Best explanation of the conflict I've found so far
That advertisement wasn't necessary, but it was GENIUS.
Thanks for explaining clearly what happens in Ukraine strategically, it's really hard to find documentation on this war because of the bias, we never know which town really got taken, and maps do not really show why or how cities are taken.
many thanks for this visualisation
I love how unbiased this is, thanks so much for this amazing video!
Four months after the fall of Bakhmut(if it ever happens), we would still be talking about the Battle for Chasiv Yar.
I have been eagerly awaiting this video!! Thank you very much
You failed to mention that Ukraine actually had some of its forces encircled and captured at Hirske-Zolote, at least 500 of them.
He said something went wrong with the withdrawal.
That was the most effective use of a sponsor that I've ever seen. Well done Sir.
Great video as always! It's still a bit weird seeing the number 2022 / 2023 in the corner
It really is!
East key is quickly becoming my favorite youtuber for a variety of reasons! Keep up the great work
1:20 The ukrainians mobilized 800k soldiers, so even if initially the russians were winning with their 200k against the ukrainian 200k, they eventually started losing griund as reservists entered the war
12:20 As russians didnt mobilize yet, and ukrainians did, the defense became increasingly solid while attack was increasingly weaker, so advances became increasingly slower
Great video overall, much more objective that most
Exactly! Ukraine have heavy loses in comparison to Russia. It was not mentioned at all
@@igorfoxly2555 This is untrue. Russia has sustained more casualties, as most sources agree. It is generally impossible for the defender to have more casualties if the attacker has no serious advantages.
800k was said about all people in national guard, army, police and security groups, more then half even not on front
@@igorfoxly2555Both have heavy losses only ukraine is the one being invaded so the war support is much higher and they also have the backing of pretty much every western country.
@@booperdooperproductions2545 no, in modern warfare the one who have superior firepower got less cassualty.
Just look at Iraq, they are at defense and now compared their cassualty with coalition army.
This is exactly what I needed!
This is very well made and gives a far better overview than any news channel, very based.
being on the defensive dosent mean that you will take less casualties
Usually it does.
@muffinskake Absolute does not, people who say that have little understanding of how war works.
@@stc3145 Not true. Casualties depend on firepower And equipment.
@@eliasziad7864 if you’r in defense Usually it does . When you’re in building you’r less visible and you see terain than people who don’t .
Yes it depends but on average it does .
When your enemy makes meaty attacks on fortified structures, as was the case in Bakhmut, then, of course, the attacker will lose more.
Two minutes in im hooked 😲 very informative video 😁 #subscribed
Extremely interesting. I’m in the loop of certain events, such as the Russian progress in the Bakhmut suburbs, but to have it visualised is so much more informative.
bahmut doesn't really matter. it's just farming)
@@xDeiMx no you’re right it doesn’t, and Ukraine will probably withdraw from it very soon.
@@willlongley1657 the most interesting will be in Melitopol
I am from Russia, if you are interested in something, I can tell you)
Great video! You are right, the Russian forces are now concentrating on clearing Bakhmut city itself instead of surrounding it.
Looking at it geographically, to properly surround the city, Russian forces would have had to take Ivanivske and hills around it. Too costly, with Ukrainian forces in Chasiv Yar overlooking the approaches.
@@ecmhands imagine actually believing this
@@ecmhands if they want to avoid civilian casualties they can end the war today
@@ecmhands Source: Trust me bro
@@ecmhands russia could avoid civilian casualties by respecting the Ukraine border.
@@ecmhands Russia could avoid killing off its young citizens by respecting Ukranian borders
Thank you so much for your video and your work.
Ok, I'll admit. That was a really smooth transition to your sponsor.
Edit: wording.
Very informative video. Truly unbiased. 👍
Thank you very much for this video
Thank you for your concise and informative video. This has really helped put the conflict in perspective and explains why certain things happened. I know that while the facts may not be fully known, you have done your best to give us as accurate and unbiased summary as humanly possible and I sincerely appreciate that. So thank you again for an amazing video and I can’t wait for your next one. :)
Excellent summary. Thank you
The road 0506 has never been cut, and Khromovo has never been captured.
And attacks on dyleevka, predtechino, etc. are not shown
NO, Russia was at the disadvantage of personnel since the beginning but had equipment advantage. Ukraine on the other waited until the Russians were deep inside and the equipment from the west arrived . The Russians then withdrew within 4 days from the unentrenched positions in the north and west, without almost any loss, since they knew the attack was coming. and has kept the position they were able to entrench since then and are pushing forward. but Ukraine started the war with 650k personnel vs 80k Russians. After the Russian "partial mobilization" it is now 1:1.
do you beleive the idiocy you just wrote??? the ukrainian standing army at the start of the war was 100k the invading russian army with allies was over 300000, and Russian losses in teh north and west was huge kharkiv alone lost RuZZia over 1000 vehicles
@@tuehojbjerg969 🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
Agreed
@@tuehojbjerg969 why not 100000000?) clown
@@MyName-lq7rv That's terribly incorrect, Russia invaded with 150k troops, and 40k rebels (This is a guess, likely lower number) So around 200,000 or less troops invaded Ukraine, while Ukraine had 250k troops, but mobilized hundreds of thousands.
Amazing, Thank you!
Very few sources do i trust on this war. Eastory is one such trusted source
Do you trust oversimplified?
Like your work very much and the fact that you admit there might be many errors in your research makes your work even that more remarkable! Carry on with it 🙂
This was the best RUclips ad I've ever seen. Except for NordMan.
its very nice to see the most talented estonian to upload videos
First time viewer and I have to say good job. Not going to nitpick in it, as you seem to be well aware of the imperfections.
I'm impressed that you managed to cover the entire year of fighting without the tactics and explanations either getting too overly convoluted or complex, or dumbing things down too much for a general audience. This is a trap which many other RUclipsrs and analysts have unfortunately fallen into, however this video was an exception to that! This felt just right with how it covered the conflict in the East. Great video!
Excellent video. Thank you
One of the best videos about this war, i think the biggest advantage Ukraine has is numerical superiority, if they loose that, they are done.
In troops.
Ukraine has a numerical advantage in troops, what planet do you come from my man😅😅😅😅☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
From earth and you? Venus?
I lost braincells reading it
How can you type without braincells?
Excellent. The maps highlighting defensive terrains (urban/high) really clarify a lot of the already known events. As a side note I had to smile when I (a 50 year long wargamer) was being instructed on how supply was the cause for retreats from salients. : ) Good for the next gen of wargamers to learn though!
I am from the north-east of Ukraine, I saw and could talk with Russian troops for example at checkpoints, many of them were 18-20 years old (They were going from Sumy to Kyiv). Basically, they were recruit soldiers, they were very afraid of this,they not ready for this,very hungry etc because they thought it will last in 3-5 days, and if they didn’t lie, they didn’t know where they were going, the leadership took away their phones, many of them died due to their inexperience.
dude at least try to make it believable
@@tipvs Good luck to shot troops directly and not get killed after this) XD
@@tipvsTheres videos of exactly that which the whole world saw about a year ago. What are you doubting here? Reality?
good summary. Thank you
Great Video, Not biased to ukraine and explaining everything as neutral as possible
Simply amazing, good efforts !
Wonderful I recently discussed this topic with a family member of mine. I hope my observations will confirm themselves otherwise I‘ll have to write quite the long correction letter ;D
Still remember stories from horrible fightings in Bakhmut and Soledar from my father's best friend. He died in January, defending Soledar
Thank you!
Great work! Which part of the Russian line do you think is weakest and likely the target of the major Ukrainian counter offensive?
According to the leaked us documents the kharkiv axis got 50k rus personnel followed by bakhmut 30k followed by the frontline near kherson with 22k.
But satellite images shows massive amount of trenches in the south, Washington post got a good article about it with satellite images before and after.
@@l0lzor123 Asuming those documents are even legit and not leaked on purpose.
@@l0lzor123 The Russian Federation is very afraid that Ukraine will attack the Sea of Azov and simply completely destroy the Crimean bridge
and this will give Ukraine the opportunity to enter Crimea for the first time in 10 long years
@@НАЙН-з7б eh? If the Crimean bridge is destroyed - it's several KM long so good luck trying to 'destroy it', Russia still has a land bridge to Crimea - to stop that Ukraine would have to take Melitopol and Mariupol and a whole load of territory and they're not going to manage that. So despite what you claim Ukraine has no hope of entering crimea ever. What is it with pro Ukie commentators and their total BS views of this war.
@@CyrilSneer123 The Russian Federation is taking out the T-54 from warehouses, this says a lot, before that they were taking out the T-55
and before that T-62
What do you think will happen after the T-54, IS (any modifications)?
the budget deficit of the Russian Federation is very large even after the tax increase,
in 4 months it reached 4 trillion rubles.
At this rate, the "cups" (as Putin called the reserve of the Russian Federation) will be enough until the middle of 2024.
Операция бахмутская мясорубка помогла России оттянуть время начала великого украинского контротсоса на полгода, сковать вражеские войска и уничтожить куча живой силы противника, поистине гениальная операция генерала Суровикина💪
That feeling when you seat in a comfortable chair, watching video where all the arrows of attacking troops directed right into you. buuh creepy
Jõhker, et sina saad selliste videotega palju vähem vaatamisi kui Artur Rehi oma clickbaity reaction tüüpi videotega, mida laseb välja iga päev. Tänud sellegipoolest väga hästi tehtud töö eest.
Aitäh! :)
Great analysis Eastory
Love this video!
Amazing level of detail.
Great video man!
14:50 This was not due to losses, but in view of the ill-conceived plan. At the beginning of the conflict, it was from the Russian Federation that 90,000 soldiers were brought into the conflict territory (including all branches of the armed forces and even cooks, drivers, and so on). There were 50,000 more from the DPR and the LPR. But even after the agreements on a peaceful settlement, where the troops were withdrawn from Kiev, there were still not enough soldiers (some still went on vacation, the other was transferred to new frontiers). Russians have lost their vitality because of the intensity of the fighting, therefore, the presentation of the material in the form of "is fundamentally not true. I really liked the "high trust" icon for the CNN channel.
Postscript. Before the start of the war, Ukraine, contrary to international obligations, still planned a second attack on the breakaway republics and had a contingent of 200,000-210,000 military personnel on those borders. Therefore, there is no need to be a doctor of mathematical sciences to understand what's what. Channels with a click of "high trust" will not tell you this. You can see individuals from the war zone (Patrick Lanncaster, for example).
Also, in a strange way, you do not mention the three waves of mobilizations in Ukraine that are still taking place. Russian Russians had only one mobilization, and most of them are still undergoing coordination and training in Belarus, unlike the Ukrainian mobilized, although the Russians are not so smooth in places. Also, if you are talking about "forced recruitment of Russians", look at the surveys conducted by military correspondents agents and you will be surprised that a significant part of people are volunteers. And in the country itself, the borders are still not closed and anyone can leave Russia.
HAHHA SO MUHC RUSSIAN PROPAGANDAnice the russian army had over 190k regular supporterd by over 100k unregular and diffrent fascist and nazi miltias, there was no peaceful settlement the russian withdrew under fire and lost a ton of vehicles. there was no such attacked planned agasint the tussian fascist republics, Russian mobilised HALF where sent directly to the front, LANCASTER IS A OPEN FASCIST AND A MEBMBER OF THE DPR MILITIA anyone watching him is watching russian nazi propaganda
I agree with you.
I like how gently you made fun of an obviously-dishonest paid-for presentation. To put a high-trust-source check mark on CNN one has to be either retarded or absolutely shamelessly dishonest.
You mixed some info with pure Russian propaganda. Russia retreated because the Kyiv plan failed. It was no peace agreement, they just retreat to positions more suited for what remained of their fighting forces. Ukraine is expected to fight so full mobilization and closing borders is a normal action whereas Putin promised his smo doesn't need any additional forces. In your numbers you forgot to mention the convincts used by wagner
@@vioss Patrick Lanncaster = russian propaganda! 10/10.
Russian manpower shortages were only partially due to casualties. Their manpower issues in autumn 2022 were in large part due to many of their soldiers contracts ending months before mobilisation swelled their ranks and gave them numerical parity.
Another stunning work by Eastory. Let's hope Bakhmut and Ukraine holds and throw occupants away from motherland.
Sheesh, crazy animation with blender. You are awesome
thnx for update bro
It would have been great to also see an estimated casualty/soldiers on the fronts count in parallel
There is no reliable source for these numbers yet.
@@malokegames Unfortunately, you're right.
Unfortunately, losses on both sides have already exceeded 100 thousand...
but the Russian Federation lost approximately 1.5 times more than Ukraine,
especially when mobilization began in the Russian Federation
@@НАЙН-з7б In Ukraine, mobilisation has been going on since the first day of the war. By that logic they should have high casualties because of it.
Can you do a video series about the ukraine war after the invasion of Ukraine is over and a little of the fog of war has lifted? Because I believe (hope) that the facts should then be more available.
The fog of war will dissipate in many years' time, when the war will have become part of history and will have little impact on the present. Archives will begin to be declassified and previously unknown facts and details will come to light. Perhaps your children or grandchildren will be able to watch the most authentic overview :)
2:20 где достать такую карту?
I have been waiting for this for months
This is quality content and a good video, but as a Ukrainian this is so painful to watch. To see towns and villages obliterated over-and-over by the russian warmachine. There has to be more help from the western allies. This video sums up why it's justified.
Thank you
Babe wake up eastory just dropped a new video
Make ww1 series like you did with ww2
Sits in a holde dieing for 4 years*