Modigliani and Edvard Munch were constantly stolen and forged. How do we know what is real? John Drew can even forge a provenance. ruclips.net/video/jQt5e_VV3Dc/видео.htmlsi=b2HA6Py-XyhWbyVK
You left out that he was given the most minimum sentence possible. And he created a painting right there in the court room to prove he wasn't bluffing about selling a forgery. And remarked how nothing about the painting had changed, yet people wouldn't cross the street to see it for free, when before people would pay moment just for a glimpse at it. He had a point.
As an artist, it’s hard to make a penny. If people stopped being so obsessed with names, and started paying attention to things they like the look of, especially the rich… it would be a different world.
Buying what they like if they are rich doesn't mean they want to pay an amount based on how rich they are. If you put a million dollars on your art and they have a billion it doesn't mean they will want to spend a million to get it. Unless there is competition over buying it. And that puts an artificial value on the art which brings you back to where we are today.
This is what makes me sad about dead painters getting posthumous fame. When these people sound like they were good artists but made no money… being alive.
If you like the art the value doesn't really matter. Where you get into trouble is when it stops being art and it becomes money. Treating it as money it really is just a signature on the money.
The great thing about Beltracchi is, that he did not make copies of existing paintings. He made wholly original paintings in the style of famous painters, then slapped their names on them.
thats why i dont get why Eric Hebborn wasnt on this... the man was killed for his crimes against the uber-wealthy... but they cant even tell his works from the old masters
The college where I work has an Elmyr de Hory print done in the style of Cezanne. I understand it's value is mostly in the fact that it's one of the few works to which he signed his own name.
Modigliani and Edvard Munch were constantly stolen and forged. How do we know what is real? John Drew can even forge a provenance. ruclips.net/video/jQt5e_VV3Dc/видео.htmlsi=b2HA6Py-XyhWbyVK
People sell fake Tracy Emin works right now. Although she has allegedly admitted she can’t remember exactly which are hers and which are not due to the condition she was in during some acts of creation…..
Modigliani and Edvard Munch were constantly stolen and forged. Picasso forges sold for over £Million. The forger in my video can produce many in a day. How do we know what is real? John Drew can even forge a provenance. ruclips.net/video/jQt5e_VV3Dc/видео.htmlsi=b2HA6Py-XyhWbyVK
you have missed to put _Konrad Kujau_ in your video. Not only is he famous for the forgery of the Hitler Diaries. But he was also an excellent painter who could copy the style of nearly every old master.
How about a Biographics on Han van Meegeren. He discovered (created) 'new works by old masters' and and narrowly avoided the death penalty for his troubles.
Video idea: body farms. Human remains collected and doled out for forensic training or scientific use. There's a couple notable ones in Utah and Georgia
@sideprojects you should have included Mark Landis the art forger who doesn’t do it for money in fact he gives his paintings away you could do a biographics video all about him
When I was in graduate school I worked with an art historian to do carbon-14 dating and chemical analysis of paintings to check for forgeries before purchase by a local gallery.
Although it's illegal, it's just one of those crimes I really find respectful. They mainly scam rich people who are obsessed by an artist's name, you can't tell the difference and it takes a lot of skill.
I personally don't have an issue with art forgeries. Many people have painted copies of paintings they like, and if it's a good likeness, where's the harm?
@@henrygustavekrausse7459 I reckon they should use someone that can verify the painting before purchasing, but Do people enjoy it any less when viewing forged paintings in museums? If you can't tell the difference I honestly don't see the harm in it.
They don't only scam rich people. Forgers scam plenty of working and middle class people every day on Ebay and other such auction sites. It's not respectful at all. It's a scam to get rich. If they took the money and gave it to charity then maybe that would begin to be 'respectful. But seriously forgers don't just forge Picasso and Renoir. They forge artists whose work may sell for less than 5K. And they forge signatures on prints and baseballs, etc all the time. Also, the fact that people want to own work because of the artist's name is not unlike people buying books or albums or merchandise based on name recognition. We ALL do that. We don't deserve to be scammed.
Van Meegering, born in 1889, wanted to study art. His father wanted him to study architecture, seems familiar... I guess if he did get accepted into art school, he could have been a famous forger instead of what happened.
In his autobiography, American forger Ken Perenyi claimed that he did not claim that his forgeries were originals, telling galleries and auction houses that they had been left to him by relatives, bought at flea markets, etc. He let the customer make the claims. It may have worked because despite a reputed FBI investigation he was never charged.
Not really they are fraudsters. They could write false checks it’s the same. They are not artists they are criminals. Robbed a bank could you call that an art form. They are dumb criminals, they could sell drugs or whatever.
Imho Konrad Kujau is one of the greatest forgers ever. Even if you might say his greatest successes - Hitler‘s diaries - weren’t exactly pieces of art in the strict sense; but it was an artform in itsself how he triggered the extreme drive for recognition, the greed and the craving of a few german journalists to rewrite history (an no „Fritze“ wasn‘t Hitler’s second name) - and it was a blow to the reputation to one of the two most reknowed weekly magazines in Germany (Stern) it never recovered from until today. There was a movie made about the whole thing „Schtonk“ of Helmut Dietl, absolutely hilarious.
Hey, you can add Shaun Greenhalgh to that list - and he's still alive! He's still profiting in a small way from his crimes, and is now a respected artist in his own right.
I dunno if this is a hot take or not but I genuinely think that if the original artist is dead, then making forgeries of their work (assuming they're high quality enough to fool experts) is a victimless crime.
Yes sure. Victimless because you don’t know them? It hurts the artist, artists are supported by collectors then the collectors don’t buy anymore. Do you like someone selling you a car that has an owner? How do you like that? That’s fraud!!!! And fraud hurt people and you should have more ethics than respect the law for a reason. One day someone will full you tell me that it didn’t affect you?
You don't even need to swap out signatures. Second year at the Kubert School before realizing what a joke that dump was, they hired full time a guy who didn't even bother to swap out the signatures on the art he claimed was his lol
20%? Har! Triggers a suggestion if applicable: many years ago but heard of an experiment/test whereupon highly-rated traditional literature was resubmitted in guise of fresh writing by unknown authors and all were summarily rejected as trash.
I'm surprised you didn't include John Myatt. His forgeries netted about $30 million, even though he used house paint and KY-Jelly to make them. And that is both impressive, for him, and a withering indictment of "art experts". He's had a British TV show about painting like the Masters and he still paints them, but includes his own signature, so that they can't be sold as originals.
Lots of the forgeries are just as well done and creative as the originals. Iy would seem art isn’t so much about the work itself, but more about creating new techniques and styles. As for the value, that seems to be more of a hype thing.
@@angrydoggy9170 That's the case with any art form. And it's not even about new techniques; it's about fashion, essentially. Some painters are considered great and others are not, because other people say so. You can't make an objective assessment of a subjective quality, like "good art".
It's the perfect crime because it exploits the fault of the curator for not doing their one job. If the curator doesn't do it, are they just going to announce to the world that they don't do their one job? Hell no!
I am a bit disappointed that you didn't include Konrad Kujau. But then, he possibly deserves a video for himself, as he single-handedly caused one of the biggest press scandals in Germany, and sold "original Kujau-forgeries".
I admire forgers because they are superb artists and they fool pretentious "experts." I dislike pretentious, preening, posturing, dishonest, arrogant "experts."
Art is not how gifted a person is with creating a piece of artistic genius with qualities of extraordinary beauty creating a beautiful exquisite piece of art. means nothing to art lovers if they don’t demand the highest monetary value in their selling to the world’s richest people. Most expensive art is not a masterpieces genius but a great famous highest values in sales history that are not in any way genius created but popular known rather than exquisite masterpieces.
Many real art works were lost during the Second World War, so all this forgery isn't suprising. In fact many famous artist works have been destroyed or disappeared, for many other reasons too. Beware that if you accidentally buy a forgery, some artist's estates will insist that they be destroyed, after being found to be a fake, leaving you out of pocket on the money you paid. If you want a genuine famous artist's work, it is often better to opt for prints, if the artist has done etchings, aquatints and / or screen prints, because paintings are often the target of forgers.
Although not art per se, one man forged several dozens if not hundreds of religious artifacts. His name.... Oded Golan. Royal seals, ancient jewelry, aaand... the so called ‘tablet of King David’. The tablet was touted as genuine by several experts until an in-depth analysis of the patina as well as a grammatical error proved it to be false.
Sorry to pick you up on a technicality but forged art hasn't been around since the dawn of time. In fact, for many billion years after the big bang, there were none.
I find these forgers much more interesting than most artists! The art world is full of dirty money and 95% thin air. Rightly so these highly talented "forgers" tried to get their part of the cake.
Wolfgang Beltracchi in my opinion was the daddy of them all to dress his wife up as her grandmother and take photos of her in a staged room with the fake paintings on the walls amazing, also he had the ability to fake so many different artists he even thought of the paintings must have the right smell the dust must be of the right age.
0:50 - Chapter 1 - Elmyr de hory
4:35 - Chapter 2 - Thomas patrick keating
7:55 - Chapter 3 - Han van meegeren
12:00 - Chapter 4 - Wolfgang beltracchi
scamming Goring during WW2 makes you a legend.
Modigliani and Edvard Munch were constantly stolen and forged. How do we know what is real? John Drew can even forge a provenance. ruclips.net/video/jQt5e_VV3Dc/видео.htmlsi=b2HA6Py-XyhWbyVK
You left out that he was given the most minimum sentence possible. And he created a painting right there in the court room to prove he wasn't bluffing about selling a forgery. And remarked how nothing about the painting had changed, yet people wouldn't cross the street to see it for free, when before people would pay moment just for a glimpse at it. He had a point.
As an artist, it’s hard to make a penny.
If people stopped being so obsessed with names, and started paying attention to things they like the look of, especially the rich… it would be a different world.
Buying what they like if they are rich doesn't mean they want to pay an amount based on how rich they are. If you put a million dollars on your art and they have a billion it doesn't mean they will want to spend a million to get it. Unless there is competition over buying it. And that puts an artificial value on the art which brings you back to where we are today.
God Bless.
Rich people don't buy art just because they like the art, it's to launder money. How are you an artist and not know this?
@@TheAsj97 for some. Sure. Many like to collect status symbols and such too.
I disagree, I can't keep up with orders and projects.
Great video, many thanks. I would have added the flamboyant and talented Eric Hebborn into the mix too.
This is what makes me sad about dead painters getting posthumous fame. When these people sound like they were good artists but made no money… being alive.
Art, where the signature is worth more than the painting.
Kinda takes away from the purpose of the art in the first place, doesn't it? 😞
@@bigafroman4277 sadly
If you like the art the value doesn't really matter. Where you get into trouble is when it stops being art and it becomes money. Treating it as money it really is just a signature on the money.
Art: Yet another tax dodge.
Sorta but the art world is really just money laundering that’s accepted socially
The great thing about Beltracchi is, that he did not make copies of existing paintings.
He made wholly original paintings in the style of famous painters, then slapped their names on them.
thats why i dont get why Eric Hebborn wasnt on this... the man was killed for his crimes against the uber-wealthy... but they cant even tell his works from the old masters
He did both. But I admire his "originals" most. Brilliant and brash. Two thumbs up
The college where I work has an Elmyr de Hory print done in the style of Cezanne. I understand it's value is mostly in the fact that it's one of the few works to which he signed his own name.
I have a Cézanne by Keating. Bought at the Christie’s Auction after his death in 1984. It’s probably worth less now than it was then
Actuallly, the greatest forgers are like the greatest spies. They’ve never been discovered.
Hmmm
yea true, but that’s why the title says “The most notorious forgers”
Modigliani and Edvard Munch were constantly stolen and forged. How do we know what is real? John Drew can even forge a provenance. ruclips.net/video/jQt5e_VV3Dc/видео.htmlsi=b2HA6Py-XyhWbyVK
That’s not true
He sold a fake picasso while picasso was still alive, the nerve of the guy
People sell fake Tracy Emin works right now. Although she has allegedly admitted she can’t remember exactly which are hers and which are not due to the condition she was in during some acts of creation…..
Picasso probably thought it was funny.
@@dees3179 I had never heard of this artist....thank you for making me Google something amazing today!😀
Modigliani and Edvard Munch were constantly stolen and forged. Picasso forges sold for over £Million. The forger in my video can produce many in a day. How do we know what is real? John Drew can even forge a provenance. ruclips.net/video/jQt5e_VV3Dc/видео.htmlsi=b2HA6Py-XyhWbyVK
i've always loved movies about art forgeries.
The curator has one job.
you have missed to put _Konrad Kujau_ in your video. Not only is he famous for the forgery of the Hitler Diaries. But he was also an excellent painter who could copy the style of nearly every old master.
This video is a true work of art!
Wow!! Simon's beard is amazing!!!
Fascinating. Every single one of these lives could be turned into a movie. Or television series.
Funny thing is van Meegeren's are now worth quite a bit.
To be fair, their value has less to do with van Meegeren's talent or ability and more to do with the history and notoriety.
How about a Biographics on Han van Meegeren. He discovered (created) 'new works by old masters' and and narrowly avoided the death penalty for his troubles.
Video idea: body farms.
Human remains collected and doled out for forensic training or scientific use. There's a couple notable ones in Utah and Georgia
I would love him to do a still life for me. Would be breath taking. Worth every cent
@sideprojects you should have included Mark Landis the art forger who doesn’t do it for money in fact he gives his paintings away you could do a biographics video all about him
When I was in graduate school I worked with an art historian to do carbon-14 dating and chemical analysis of paintings to check for forgeries before purchase by a local gallery.
You had me at "all sorts of horrible stuff."
Although it's illegal, it's just one of those crimes I really find respectful. They mainly scam rich people who are obsessed by an artist's name, you can't tell the difference and it takes a lot of skill.
I personally don't have an issue with art forgeries. Many people have painted copies of paintings they like, and if it's a good likeness, where's the harm?
What if it's bought by a museum? Museums are for the people.
@@henrygustavekrausse7459 I reckon they should use someone that can verify the painting before purchasing, but Do people enjoy it any less when viewing forged paintings in museums? If you can't tell the difference I honestly don't see the harm in it.
@@Chris.Pontius If it's found out after purchase, then that museum has just lost a lot of money.
They don't only scam rich people. Forgers scam plenty of working and middle class people every day on Ebay and other such auction sites. It's not respectful at all. It's a scam to get rich. If they took the money and gave it to charity then maybe that would begin to be 'respectful. But seriously forgers don't just forge Picasso and Renoir. They forge artists whose work may sell for less than 5K. And they forge signatures on prints and baseballs, etc all the time. Also, the fact that people want to own work because of the artist's name is not unlike people buying books or albums or merchandise based on name recognition. We ALL do that. We don't deserve to be scammed.
As an artist, I enjoyed this.
A tutorial in my opinion... good stuff. I have watched many Beltracchi videos, entertaining and educational.
a magnificent episode.
Van Meegering, born in 1889, wanted to study art. His father wanted him to study architecture, seems familiar...
I guess if he did get accepted into art school, he could have been a famous forger instead of what happened.
In his autobiography, American forger Ken Perenyi claimed that he did not claim that his forgeries were originals, telling galleries and auction houses that they had been left to him by relatives, bought at flea markets, etc. He let the customer make the claims. It may have worked because despite a reputed FBI investigation he was never charged.
" Bad artists copy. Great artists steal. " - Picasso
I’ve got an original Picasso for sale. I even make them on demand about any subject you want.
Currently being done in China.
Forgery seems like an art form
Not really they are fraudsters. They could write false checks it’s the same. They are not artists they are criminals. Robbed a bank could you call that an art form. They are dumb criminals, they could sell drugs or whatever.
Tom Keating, the man who outparmered Parmer.
Elmyr de Hory was also the subject of the Orson Welles movie F for Fake. I'm not sure if I'd call it a good movie, but certainly interesting.
Would be interested in more side projects about criminals maybe a book Thief list with William jacques
Keating... Mwahhh (Chef’s Kiss).
Good video 👍
Ken Perenyi deserves to be on the list as well!
Lol, how can you dislike these characters, duping the pretentious fops in the art world. Buyer beware!
'Fake paintings' don't exist, a painting is a painting. Art is art.
Imho Konrad Kujau is one of the greatest forgers ever. Even if you might say his greatest successes - Hitler‘s diaries - weren’t exactly pieces of art in the strict sense; but it was an artform in itsself how he triggered the extreme drive for recognition, the greed and the craving of a few german journalists to rewrite history (an no „Fritze“ wasn‘t Hitler’s second name) - and it was a blow to the reputation to one of the two most reknowed weekly magazines in Germany (Stern) it never recovered from until today. There was a movie made about the whole thing „Schtonk“ of Helmut Dietl, absolutely hilarious.
It's a work of beauty and a joy forever! Better yet, it's worth money.
I'm not crass, I merely have a great deal of taste and refinement.
Hey, you can add Shaun Greenhalgh to that list - and he's still alive! He's still profiting in a small way from his crimes, and is now a respected artist in his own right.
I dunno if this is a hot take or not but I genuinely think that if the original artist is dead, then making forgeries of their work (assuming they're high quality enough to fool experts) is a victimless crime.
Yes sure. Victimless because you don’t know them? It hurts the artist, artists are supported by collectors then the collectors don’t buy anymore. Do you like someone selling you a car that has an owner? How do you like that? That’s fraud!!!! And fraud hurt people and you should have more ethics than respect the law for a reason. One day someone will full you tell me that it didn’t affect you?
You don't even need to swap out signatures. Second year at the Kubert School before realizing what a joke that dump was, they hired full time a guy who didn't even bother to swap out the signatures on the art he claimed was his lol
20%? Har! Triggers a suggestion if applicable: many years ago but heard of an experiment/test whereupon highly-rated traditional literature was resubmitted in guise of fresh writing by unknown authors and all were summarily rejected as trash.
I'm surprised you didn't include John Myatt. His forgeries netted about $30 million, even though he used house paint and KY-Jelly to make them. And that is both impressive, for him, and a withering indictment of "art experts". He's had a British TV show about painting like the Masters and he still paints them, but includes his own signature, so that they can't be sold as originals.
and Eric... i think his researcher was alittle out of their element on this one
Lots of the forgeries are just as well done and creative as the originals.
Iy would seem art isn’t so much about the work itself, but more about creating new techniques and styles. As for the value, that seems to be more of a hype thing.
@@angrydoggy9170 That's the case with any art form. And it's not even about new techniques; it's about fashion, essentially. Some painters are considered great and others are not, because other people say so.
You can't make an objective assessment of a subjective quality, like "good art".
@@OneMoreJames Indeed, but a tragic live and death does help.
Aren't the best forgers the ones who don't get caught?
Elmyr De Hory's life was documented by Orson Welles in de docudrama F For Fake. Highly recommended!
It's the perfect crime because it exploits the fault of the curator for not doing their one job. If the curator doesn't do it, are they just going to announce to the world that they don't do their one job? Hell no!
When all you have to fake is a signature instead of faking a masterpiece.
Geeze, there's not much interest in this subject, apparently. I think it's a great video.
what is the song at @4:30 ?
Forgery is an art in itself. At the end of the day who cares who actually made it if no one can tell the difference?
we the average and great un-washed masses are the winners in that debate... =)
A few examples of their work would be welcome...
Or are there issues of copyright ?
I am a bit disappointed that you didn't include Konrad Kujau. But then, he possibly deserves a video for himself, as he single-handedly caused one of the biggest press scandals in Germany, and sold "original Kujau-forgeries".
The RUclips Casual Criminalist link doesn't work?
You should have included Ken Perenyi
Very interesting but if you spoke a bit slower it would be more pleasant to listen to. Thanks
Isn't forgery the sincerest form of flattery?
You missed an hilarious one: Eric Hebborn
Do Cincinnati’s unions terminal, the biggest half dome in the west hemisphere and it is the pinnacle of Art Deco
Sideproject Idea: Deusenberg Model J
If you could get a frame and running gear from an original it could work as the bodies were all one offs.
Simon you could do a live on, live aid
I see the only crime being committed is not telling disgustingly rich ppl that they were not originals.
The best was one curator forged the greats but when caught he said others forged his forgeries and they got worse and worse down the line
My grandpa Stanley was a painter and ngl Elmyr de Hory looks identical to my grandpa...wtf 😮
I admire forgers because they are superb artists and they fool pretentious "experts." I dislike pretentious, preening, posturing, dishonest, arrogant "experts."
Pity you didn't extrapolate on Van Meegeren, there was a lot more about the affair but mayb not enough time?
Art is not how gifted a person is with creating a piece of artistic genius with qualities of extraordinary beauty creating a beautiful exquisite piece of art. means nothing to art lovers if they don’t demand the highest monetary value in their selling to the world’s richest people. Most expensive art is not a masterpieces genius but a great famous highest values in sales history that are not in any way genius created but popular known rather than exquisite masterpieces.
It would be nice to see a Top Tenz of the most (successfully) forged artists.
Hmm bit of a contradiction though, isn't it? If the forgeries were successful, we wouldn't know, so a video couldn't be made about them.
Many real art works were lost during the Second World War, so all this forgery isn't suprising. In fact many famous artist works have been destroyed or disappeared, for many other reasons too.
Beware that if you accidentally buy a forgery, some artist's estates will insist that they be destroyed, after being found to be a fake, leaving you out of pocket on the money you paid.
If you want a genuine famous artist's work, it is often better to opt for prints, if the artist has done etchings, aquatints and / or screen prints, because paintings are often the target of forgers.
now that we talk about Art, i wonder how successfull Hitler would've been if the Art school in Vienna hadn't rejected him Twice.
BRITAIN'S No1 ART FORGER - MAX BRANDRETT, THE LIFE OF A CHEEKY FAKER biography is out now!
What happened to the Brainfood show?
is my favorite.
i wonder if their fakes and forgeries have been preserved and are worth anything these days.
Although not art per se, one man forged several dozens if not hundreds of religious artifacts. His name.... Oded Golan. Royal seals, ancient jewelry, aaand... the so called ‘tablet of King David’. The tablet was touted as genuine by several experts until an in-depth analysis of the patina as well as a grammatical error proved it to be false.
Sorry to pick you up on a technicality but forged art hasn't been around since the dawn of time. In fact, for many billion years after the big bang, there were none.
Art forgeries bah ! You should see how automotive forgeries are done. Very Very shady.
pfft, they cant even bother to get the font correct of the number pad of a 350 LT1 camaro... show me a forger that has taken the time to do that
here is a suggestion for Bio or criminalist
Forger of Mormon documents and mad bomber
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Hofmann
Mormons, the worst of them all, greed and murder, to protect their bogus cult.
Art, where if it isn't a forgery, it's stolen.
"Gregacious"? 😳🙄😏
Meh, a badly forged spelling? Blame the American scriptwriters and editors, as narrators perform their work sic erat scriptum.
@@owenshebbeare2999 sure, because blaming Americans is always better than admitting responsibility.
Anyone else get the feeling that this might not be a genuine Simon Whistler?
Guess they will have to use forgeries for their moneylaundring then
I love the idea of art forgery. Hope to see it succeed.
Just wondering if you like Canada
If Beltracchi is not no.1 then imma head out
Well..he was but no one will understand why he deserves to be no.1
nah, Eric Hebborn
He was the most intelligent and arrogant of the bunch. Also the best painter.
Art
(F)art. A dodgy business for sure.
Art may be faked but I bet Simon's beard isn't.
I think it's hilarious myself.
Video 9. Will update those who don't know in the next one
Need or want a handmade repro? I’m your Huckleberry
If you enjoy CRIME!
So is this a real Fact Boi video or just a well done fake?
"cubism and other forms of surrealism"???
No Neil Caffrey?
No Curtis Hagen?
You are a particular kind of…
...allegedly...
@@daniels.2720 “Daniel… what are you doing?” - Peter Burke
day 18 of suggesting “Das Bauhaus” art school.
pretty please!! 🥺🥺
I find these forgers much more interesting than most artists! The art world is full of dirty money and 95% thin air. Rightly so these highly talented "forgers" tried to get their part of the cake.
Wolfgang Beltracchi in my opinion was the daddy of them all to dress his wife up as her grandmother and take photos of her in a staged room with the fake paintings on the walls amazing, also he had the ability to fake so many different artists he even thought of the paintings must have the right smell the dust must be of the right age.
Agreed, he is "the man". I am working on how to copy his "originals" Beltracchi had style and class as well as skill and talent.
2% maybe not 20%