CAUGHT! Baby Reindeer's Real Life Martha Interview: EVERY LIE & CONTRADICTION Exposed!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 май 2024
- CAUGHT! Baby Reindeer's Real Life Martha Interview: EVERY LIE & CONTRADICTION Exposed!
Thumbnail images are satire created by adobe photoshop and artificial intelligence artwork.
Excerpt from Business Insider
The woman outed as the alleged 'Baby Reindeer' stalker said she felt 'used' in Piers Morgan interview, where he asked her if she loves Richard Gadd
A woman who was outed by "Baby Reindeer" fans as the alleged stalker of the true crime drama's creator and lead actor said she felt "used" by Piers Morgan in an interview about the Netflix series.
"Baby Reindeer" tells a fictionalized version of creator Richard Gadd's experiences with stalking, and has become a worldwide phenomenon since its release in April. That month, an unnamed woman who was outed on social media as "the real Martha Scott" told the Daily Mail she was considering taking legal action against Gadd and Netflix for the harassment she has faced as a result of viewers trying to track her down.
On Wednesday, Morgan revealed he had interviewed Fiona Harvey, believed to be the woman first interviewed by the Daily Mail. The interview will be released Thursday at 3pm ET on Morgan's RUclips channel, Piers Morgan Uncensored.
Excerpt from The Independent
Real-life Martha Scott from Baby Reindeer sits down for tell-all Piers Morgan interview
The show has already sparked a backlash among viewers
The woman who allegedly inspired Richard Gadd’s hit Netflix series Baby Reindeer will give her first TV interview this Thursday (9 May).
In the series, comedian Richard Gadd plays a fictionalised version of himself who gets stalked by a lonely and mentally ill woman called Martha, whom he meets while working at a pub.
Following the series’ success curious fans have tried to discover the inspirations behind the show, which members of the cast have vehemently discouraged.
Scottish lawyer Fiona Harvey, 58, who has been labelled the ‘real Martha’ has received death threats from Baby Reindeer viewers and will speak on Piers Morgan Uncensored to “set the record straight after being unmasked by fans”.
Excerpt from The Sun
‘STALKER’ UNMASKED ‘I’m very attractive and I’m a lawyer’, says ‘real Baby Reindeer stalker’ Fiona Harvey as she threatens Netflix
THE WOMAN thought to be the real-life stalker from Netflix smash Baby Reindeer is threatening to sue Netflix.
The gritty real-life drama was inspired by the ordeal suffered by Scots creator and leading man Richard Gadd, 34.
The harrowing tale follows barman Donny Dunn as his life falls apart at the hands of an obsessive stalker - played by Jessica Gunning, 38, - after he offers her a cup of tea in a London bar.
The deranged Baby Reindeer maniac bombarded the comic with more than 41,000 emails, 744 tweets, 100 pages of letters and 350 hours of voicemails over a four year reign of terror
Gadd claimed he went to great lengths to conceal the identity of the woman who stalked him in real life and has begged fans not to search for her.
S U P P O R T T H I S C H A N N E L:
Subscribe, Donate, & Follow Us Here: linktr.ee/AndySignore
And JOIN Our Community to become a Popcorned Planeteer, to really become a part of the team for Perks, Members Only Live Shows and EXCLUSIVE Videos & Replays: • Members-only videos
Popcorned Planet offers commentary on the biggest Celebrity News, Pop Culture Outrage and Viral Internet Stories from TikTok, Twitter, Instagram and beyond. Created and hosted by Andy Signore (creator of ScreenJunkies, Honest Trailers, MovieFights, Movie World and more). Popcorned Planet is your one stop place Daily News, Celebrity Drama, Hollywood insight and Pop Culture Commentary.
C O N T A C T / B U S I N E S S : PopcornedPlanetTeam@gmail.com
Or Send Packages, Toys & Fan Mail To:
Andy Signore
16350 Bruce B Downs Blvd
PO Box # 48742
Tampa FL, 33647
#babyreindeer #piersmorgan #richardgadd #martha #netflix #netflixseries #stalking #stalker #stalkeronline #johnnydepp #celebritynews #celebrity #news #celebritygossip #gossip
The actress who plays her deserves a standing ovation!
she was spot on.
She was absolutely spot on, scarily so!
ikr! I think Richard must have played the actress all of the voice tapes she sent him and then directed her to act exactly like she did. She deserves an award 👏
She was excellent.
@@tigerpaws111 I was thinking the exact same. Damn she's good.
Piers gave her a glass of water. That's how it starts. Run Piers, Run!
🤣🤣🤣
Ahhh ha ha ha
😂😂😂😂😂😂
The fools sip. People take a drink when they’re full of crap. Toe Rogaine and lots of folks do this all the time. Redbar is watching!
😂😂
My god, the actress in the series has her exact mannerisms! This woman contradicts herself sooo many times during this. I hope Piers has good home security!
Exactly
“We’ve gone to such great lengths to disguise her to the point that I don’t think she would recognise herself. What’s been borrowed is an emotional truth, not a fact-by-fact profile of someone.” said Gadd
lol I mean if he has the recordings, the actress probably had a lot of material to work with
As the actress didn’t know Harvey, it’s not inconceivable that she stalked her. How else would she be so accurate in her portrayal? That would be ironic, wouldn’t it?! 😂
@@Essemm52 I guess you are seeing the obvious, what if this women was very slim? Then no one would see any similarities.
Imagine being Gadd, not being able to walk away from the bar and being forced to listen to that word salad day in and day out. 😭🤣
Thissss
Would drive anyone looney, no wonder he has issues.. poor guy. Well rich now, good for him.
He liked talking to her, did u even watch the show
No. I refuuuuuse to imagine this! 😂😂😂
She's mad, he felt sorry for her and she was an amazing joke in the pub (to laugh at, not with). Only reason she ain't locked up . Everyone is fascinated how mad she is . True delusion
4 phones, 6 emails, and a partridge in a pear tree😂
😂
And a bat in the belfry!
4 phones called "my iphone"
Nobody needs that many phones
HAHA
The mental gymnastics my brain is doing trying to listen to her is PAINFUL.
Your reply along with others is just brilliant..
I feel like Piers felt slightly bad for her because he could have torn her to parts. You could just see he realized she was crazy and she kind of just talks and it's obvious she lives in delulu land.
I think he did hold back when he saw how easy it would have been to destroy her. I think he got some training from a counselor before this interview. He pointed out the obvious lies but didn’t get emotional with her so she didn’t act out. When dealing with psych patients this is what is recommended. As much as it’s not the truth, they believe the lies they tell and don’t understand why we don’t.
@@GeorgiaJakes7But we don't know if she believes her own lies. She could very easily just be a pathological liar. Someone with a personality disorder I'm sure. But that doesn't give her a right to be deceptive. Just like it wouldn't for anyone with an anti social personality disorder. Like a psychopath for example.
@@e.sterling141 it doesn’t give her any right I agree completely however Piers carefully demonstrating she’s full of lies meant the interview was calm rather than triggering Fiona into a rage or potentially violence if she is that mentally unstable. Piers did an amazing job by letting her show she is lying so that no one could accuse him of interfering. It was very good
He's such a good interviewer i agree
I think maybe he was told to hold back a little bit..If she's capable of anything then best to be safe!!
I just have to say, If the actress who portray’s her doesn’t win an Oscar for the drama, I will be livid. They absolutely nailed her.
They don’t give Oscars for tv, Emmys & Golden Globes
An Oscar 😂
Emmy, not Oscar. But yes. She was amazingly good.
She should definitely win a BAFTA for it. I'm not sure about an Emmy unless it is the international categories because it was shot and produced in the UK, acted by British people, was made by a British man...
If her performance is good enough for The Emmy I do need to see the series. Thank you for sharing. I had heard truth and lying but zero about performance.
Now you can understand WHY 'prince Andrew' did THAT interview, Narcissists become that confident, grandiose and delusional they 'think' they can talk their way out of anything.
They also write shows using their own name, write produce and start in them.
Did anyone notice when Piers asked her age, she replied that she was a year younger than Piers himself! Why did she know that? Careful Piers...
Good point.
@@marcdraco2189 hi fiona!
As the breakdown on stage was a lie that never happened, what else in this 'true' story was a lie? Both the fact it never happened and it was claimed to be true are both demonstrable facts.
She said that she didn't know he had a girlfriend because she thought he was a "homosexual" but yet she goes on to claim that he relentlessly flirted with her and offered to go home with her. 🤔 Just one example of many times that she contradicted herself.
He is a homosexual as the film shows.
@@imagecollections6665 no he is bisexual, shown in the series
This is history in the making. Possibly the most legendary “gotcha” ever.
I think so too.
No the is the second most legendary moment. The first was last week with that izraelie spokes person
Don’t understand why she even made herself more public and is going on interviews talking about this case when we know she is crazy!
She doesn't even realize she is being, bizarre... That's the sad part
I think she does it because she gets death threats, and if she's going to lie, then people are on her side and she won't be bothered, and she gets less hate from all the people.
I have a co-parent like her. I don't know if they really believe the lies they tell but they have an extremely unrealistic confidence that they can convince others into believing their irrational falsehoods and distorted interpretations of reality. In my case i've had to endure lengthy court trials just so she could try to convince a judge to believe the imaginary hell she created in her own mind. And where I live the courts have several times required me to pay her legal fees even when she loses.
Psycho.....
I think it’s a narcissistic trait. She cannot stay away from the spotlight now that she’s been exposed to the world.
The multiple phones and email accounts was the dead giveaway for me. Haven’t seen the show, but regardless, this woman is clearly crazy
Oh watch it it's terrifying
@@Julie-si3hihow dark is it?
Life is already so rough. and I’ve been having a hard time watching super heavy content but I’m so captivated.
@@mariliaanthony5231pretty much as dark as it gets... But he wrote in a lot of comedic moments so it wouldn't be so horrific all the time.
It's not a traumatic watch exactly, but thrilling and twisted. No spoilers just watch, it's exciting and interesting...
@mariliaanthony5231 it's very dark. It's very emotional triggering for lots of people who have been through grooming, SA, being drugged, or stalked. It's almost non stop feeling uncomfortable and cringing. For a variety of reasons
It is truly well done and layered. The dark is important for the story but don't go in thinking it's a comedy.
It's intense.
Finally! Someone pointing out every single contradiction in a properly demonstrated way.
Well done!
She’s SCARY! Piers be careful.
😂
Unpopular take perhaps but I see a lot of people saying, leave her alone as she's 'not well' but if this were a man stalking a woman, would they be saying the same thing? 🤔
Exactly. Good point.
IT WASN'T A MAN STALKING A WOMAN BUT JUST AS BAD 😮😮
Yeah but if people are actually harassing her and sending death threats to her they are no better than her. Until she decided to go on her publicity tour I felt that people should leave her alone but now she has made herself a public figure it’s fair game. But it is still sad that people feel the need to cyber stalk simply as a hobby. I mean that for anything and anyone. No matter how criminal peoples actions are. It’s just kinda pathetic to take things further than just make RUclips comment jokes. People should just get a life
So tired of this "if it was a man" thing. Plenty of crazy abuser get a pass. Individuals might have this double standard, but in general predators get away with things all the time regardless of gender.
Absolutely! Stalking is dangerous, and she should be held accountable. She is smart and well enough to get help, but she does not want to. She is absolutely getting off of on this. Google Dr. Grande. He just did a great video on this very thing.
I dated a bipolar alcoholic girl for two years from 2007-2009. She still sends me messages in 2024. You can’t escape these sorts of people. Ever. They simply don’t stop. You think you’re finally free, then one day - there they are. Those of you who have never been through this can’t imagine how it sucks the life out of you and drains your will to live.
Damn I’m alcoholic bipolar hope my ex doesn’t think of me like this 🫣
Not sure it matters. My wasband was diagnosed bipolar and alcoholic. (He got sober and the.... really hit the fan, btw. )
Later, I find out he's also diagnosed Cluster B Personality Disorder.
That really hit a lot of the scary behavior on the head. Made total sense!
A lot of times, it's a triad. Bipolar, BPD and addiction.
He had a lot of scary moments. Like he killed my cat and to this day thinks it's funny.
His shrink said all he cared about was his current behavior so he can monitor medication.
Didn't want to hear about it.
@@Lovebbardotdepends on your behaviour.
I just posted, too, what I read sounded to my amateur ears as possibly a personality disorder in the mix. (Cluster B)
I don’t think being bipolar or an alcoholic is anything to do with it my ex from 10 years ago was both of those things and I haven’t years from them at all since 2014…alcohol plus bi polar doesn’t = stalker
@@tobyb1018 sure. but in my case it does.
Piers didn't believe her either! She told lies after lies!!
Liars are very good at spotting other liars.
@@doubleRprodutions or people with common sense :)
@@doubleRprodutions literally everybody lies. Not everyone can spot a liar
@RockinDave1 watch the behavioural panel or better still her nephew speaks out. And no I wouldn't get interviewed and lie right the way through it....
Every time she gets nervous about a question she takes a drink of water
Which is why I’m assuming he gave her a glass of water to begin with. 😂
Yes or shifts in her chair...classic signs of trying to defer answering a question giving one time to calculate a reply so they can continue the lie...
The behavior panel talks about this- it's not only a way to release nervous energy/self soothe, but also covers the mouth and serves as a barrier between her and Piers.
She keeps checking her watch everytime she wants to avoid the question, or takes a sip of water..
@@catwomanh3603 ahh so that is what she was doing....I thought she had something written down so was reading off that???
Her comment about not knowing he had a girlfriend because she thought he was a homosexual was extremely offensive if you think about it. It's because his girlfriend was a transgender. So she didn't deny the attack she just denied the woman was a woman.
Calling a person homosexual in a negative way is offensive. Calling a biological man a man is fact.
Oh- excellent point- I hadn't thought of the transphobic angle, but I think you're absolutely correct.
Yes, I thought so too.
Lmao,she’s a worse liar than Amber Heard😂😂
But still not up there with conservative cabinet ministers 😉🇬🇧
Surprised she never hired her.
Been having lessons from Markle.!!
Change “conservative cabinet ministers” to “politicians of all parties” and I’d agree with you
@@johnmccann5104 True 😂
I would love to see the body language team review this .
I thought that, but body language is a terrible judge on whether or not someone is lying. So many things (for example autism or adhd) can invalidate it. It's about as useless as a lie detector (which Piers should know, being in the UK).
I sent a message to @TheBehavorialPanel asking them to make a video about this next! 🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
@@USMC6531WMI am excited to see what they have to say. It’s going to be a great episode
I thought the same thing with the very first excessive eye blink.
SAME! I've been waiting and eatching for the Behavioral Panel or Behavioral Arts to do an analysis on this. Although Spidey is very cautious when it relates to mental health, so I'm curious if he will even touch it.
Piers was so quick to shut down “oh I didn’t mean to flatter you I mean there is definitely a resemblance” he’s so worried he might’ve led her on and be the next reindeer
At first I thought she said "that's flattering," but after watching again she said "That's hardly flattering" (a dig at the actress playing Martha). Piers response ("I don't mean to flatter or not flatter you") was perfect.
Did anyone else catch that she met Gadd 3 or 4 times and shortly afterwards she said she had met up with him 5 or 6 times?
Also in the beginning when she said she went to his played, she said he “Hid” from…. And then quickly changed it. I don’t know if anyone else caught it? I was thinking Freud·i·an slip.
My photographic memory tells me it was 2 or 3 times, going up to 5 or 6.
@@ncross1857😂😂😂
Her accent made it hard to follow at times- she went to his play and he hid from her? I missed that! Details please!
@@kaywren73 ok I had to go back to watch Piers interview. In the beginning of the interview (called Meet Fiona), it was timestamped 3:38, Fiona says “ Mr. Gadd had written a play for the Edinburgh festival and he was hiding, he was holding a placard for MP’s wife”.
I thought it might be a Freudian slip like maybe Gadd saw her at his play and he tried to hide. 🤷🏼♀️
Can you imagine living your life like she does?? This is how serial killer's act in interviews. Scary!!
Right! People dont understand how dangerous stalkers can be. OJ Simpson was a stalker. Most serial killers are stalkers. I fear we may be adding fuel to the fire here.
She denies all the allegations that make her look bad but when it comes to naming the show, she'll take credit for that!
She needs to keep drinking water to help swallow her lies.
Perhaps she needs water frequently because she has type 2 diabetes which is not well managed.
I’m surprised you didn’t mention how all those voicemails must have been him recording her at that pub she only went to a few times 🤣🤪
He must have had some sophisticated equipment to eliminate the pub's background noise, too.
EVERYONE NEEDS TO GO READ THE ARTICLE BY NEIL SEARS DAILY MAIL UK!!! THIS LADY IS DISTURBED, SHE IS STALKING HIM NOW!!!
OMG!
💯
Oh dear just read it … 👀
Just read it! At least we now know who the star of season 2 will be
Unfortunately, it pays to read.
Says no, nods yes. 😂
I clocked that too 😂
Sometimes one nod during a negative response can be a quick affirming nod. Like doing it once while replying with a "No". Just to really make their point. It's called a confirmation nod. But if it's repetitive or subtle it's usually deception. I've even seen someone doing an odd mix of a nod and head shake in the same 2 seconds.
Body language guy broke it down
I will never look at Curtains the same ever again lol 😂😂
@@e.sterling141yes also need to consider baseline. Andy does a thing with head all the time. He like looks up and to the side while shaking his head no a little bit. It doesn’t appear to happen when he’s stressed, it’s just something he does. Maaaaybe when emphasizing something but mostly it just looks like something he does. So if he did that while answering a question I wouldn’t think he was lying or an indication or stress because it’s baseline for him. I don’t think most ppl understand body language or that NOTHING is an indication of lying (except that thing Amber Heard did like a little girl covering her mouth when she let it slip she called the paps 😂) body language analysis can help detect if stress, not lying. It’s just that people are often stressed when they’re lying. But people are also often stressed when they think someone thinks they’re lying. Also, one stress indicator means nothing. It needs to be in a cluster of indicators that deviate from that persons baseline. Then you know, ok, something might be here, let me dig a little deeper, ask more questions…. But people simplify to the point that it’s all misunderstood.
6 freaking different phones!!!😮
Six different email addresses?!
Who has 6 phones.for different e.mails. so fishy.who forgets their grades if your.a professional lawyer.this.is.sad case.she must be lonely.
@@patriciafitzgerald7812not just lonely
Or maybe 4 🤷♀️ Her photographic memory wasn’t working so good.
ha 4 phones, 6 email accounts.
There's zero chance of her taking legal action against Gadd and Netflix.
You think? Why didn’t Gadd report her to the police then? She has never been charged with anything, ever! How do you account for that? She has a very strong case for defamation.Gadd has in effect stolen her identity.
Oh she'll try. And they'll probably settle. But it wont shut her up. (my assessment anyway)
Her mispronouncing hyperbole really bugged me I don't know why 😂
Stef the alter nerd pronounced it like that once too, yeah it always bugs me too.
Her posh Scottish/English hybrid accent and mispronunciation of vowels really bugged me!
@@RockinDave1 She's from the borders, you'd be surprised how many people I've heard talk like that from there.
Oh me too! For me it's because she claims to be a successful attorney, yet has never heard it pronounced correctly.
It’s a word that is commonly mispronounced. Turmeric is one that always bugs me! Americans say tumoric which just sounds so wrong! So maybe it’s a regional thing. I don’t think it’s anything more than that.
She actually is a trained solicitor, so no dunce!
I had 2 cell phones-one personal and one work- my work phone was never charged and i always forgot it. How someone could keep 4-6 phones straight i have no idea.
Most people with more than 2 phones are up to something possibly illegal. I'm a senior citizen and I've contemplated getting a 2nd one because I keep misplacing mine and since we don't use "landlines" anymore it can be a problem. I know even young people do this, so I don't think it's an elderly problem.
Me Too!!!!
Hyper fixated obsession helps.
Not to mention 4- 6 emails; I have one work and one personal, and I barely keep on top of that. Only someone who is being repeatedly BLOCKED needs this many phones and emails!
Ikr 🤣
It's interesting that she felt the need to negatively characterise him as a homosexual, but then later said he tried it on with her but she turned him down. Gadd in the 'Based on a true story' series made references in some of the later episodes, regarding his insecurity about revealing too much about 'Martha', as she'd made open threats to expose him and his confusion around his sexuality. That's a pretty calculated, nasty level of psychological blackmail IMO, something about her feels deliberately malicious, self motivated and that part is what's unpleasant about her.
That was a big tell for her character for me, she's claiming to barely know him, have met him 2 or 3 times, well, maybe 6 times yet she's got the confidence to make what would be a baseless statement on the sexuality of a stranger in her first claimed scenario VS a 'I know things you don't know' type claim about him in her 'I think he's a homosexual' statement. VS her later saying actually he came on to me and I turned him down. VS later revealing actually she was making flirty 'jokes' at him over social media. Thats a whole lotta circles around circles right there. 😅🤷♂️😇
He's telling the truth, u can see he tried to help, brilliant comment, now she needs help she shouldn't be exploited any further, it's plain obvious ....it doesn't take much its sad but she needs help .. Paul Gadd also needs protecting because his message cannot be lost in the media taking advantage of her....his point is so important...sadly she is not of sound mind, it's scary..she's vulnerable but twisted...one interview sadly its plain as day....
You can absolutely see immediately it's spot on...
VS?
@@SarahWells777 Verses. 😊😊😊✌️
@@TTFNHaHa Inclined to agree with you there. I don't think she deserves to be attacked by strangers online, that doesn't really resolve anything, but I don't think she deserves a platform to enable herself with either. If I was genuinely innocent, I'd be taking this to court. But I suspect she won't given the fact that if Gadd does indeed still have those receipts. (seems likely given the twitter account she couldn't delete and tried to minimise as no big deal) then that won't be a good outcome for her. 😅
Why in the world did she agree to do the interview 😬
For attention, and/or to soak up the fame
If she's not an outright narcissist she is most certainly narcissistic. Different things. But I digress.
Narcs tend to think they're the smartest person in the room and she no doubt thought she could show Gadd up. And have people believe her. Delusional.
Also for attention/fame/money. But yeah, I don't think thats what you're asking/dumbfounded about. Narcs are quite the pieces of work. x]
Wouldn't it be crazy if this was a conspiracy between Richard Gadd and Martha to become famous. lol
I actually thought about that
Omg that did also cross my mind lol 😂 😂
Wouldn't be surprised!! 🤷🏽
@@TruffleandMushroomHuntercom Think about it. The guy is a struggling actor, not well known, and basically getting nowhere. Then he has a light bulb moment as to how he can capture the spotlight. He promises Martha fame and fortune too. It would certainly be an interesting twist to the plot. lol
"Im gonna portray myself as an insecure bad comedian who led on a stalker because she made me feel masculine." Not a very good conspiracy theory. @@dissidentfairy4264
In my opinion so dysfunctional that she dares to do a Piers Morgan interview. Also says she has not watched the Netflix and then goes on to discuss it in minute detail? I guess the truth will come out sooner or later.
A lot of comments here about how well Pierce handled this interview. I think he was sympathetic to her and didn't fully believe Gadd either. In his after-interview discussion with other guests - He kind of attacks Gadd and Netflix for their poor job on hiding supposed identities and that people are getting hurt in the process. He is very hard on Netflix for showcasing her getting convicted for stalking in a court of law - when it might not be true. I think Pierce wants this movie series to be 100% true because I guess that Netflix had claimed it was. The harsh criticisms at Gadd - makes me think some people may be missing the point of the movie - it sheds light on trauma and the ripple effects it can have on one's own self-esteem. The erratic actions/journey people take to try to get back to being whole again. Both main characters are both deeply flawed and vulnerable. They in a way mirror each other... because Gadd does become obsessed with her a little bit later with listening and organizing all her messages. Trauma can cause a ripple effect, it can also be cyclical, it can also be self-inflicted because of past trauma... I think it is also why people are so fascinated with this story - because it has soooo many layers. There is a lot of gray to it.
If she had a photographic memory, you would think she’d remember her grades!! Of all things! I have no memory whatsoever but I can safely tell you I graduated with a 3.5 GPA. Can’t wait to see what the lawyer has to say, Andy. Great video! 👏❤️
Also, many people claim to have a ‘photographic memory’. I remember reading somewhere that only around 1-2% (don’t quote me on that, I clearly don’t have a photographic memory) of the population actually have a photographic memory. It’s something people want to believe they have when, in fact, their memory is just good/average and works just like everyone else’s LOL.
Imagine she was telling the truth though…
Yeah plus she also said " I did alright, I didn't do top of the year"
in the UK an Ordinary Degree doesn't have grades so she was actually right about this by constantly repeating it was an Ordinary Degree and not an Honours (which does have grades).
What I’d like to know is has she ever practised as a lawyer? not a paralegal or some sort of assistant but an actual lawyer
I've had a stalker since 2007, several months after my fiance died. The stalker wanted to assume her identity. My restraining order got dropped a few months later due to some technical/worded mistake. I would be afraid to make a film about it.
Excellent job on reviewing the interview!!
Piers is usually a terrible interviewer, but he held himself rather professionally in this one.
I think he's a pretty good interviewer
There's also a tweet of her talking about her 23 year old toyboy who asked her where she got her moisturizer and that she fell in love. (He mentions moisturizer in the show) 🤣
There is a statement at the end by Netflix confirming some scenes have been dramatised, that’s why Martha was in court & Fiona wasn’t, Gadd already said he didn’t take it to prosecution. If it’s not her she can’t sue….so obvious Fiona is deluded….
I went to her FB and April 29th (I think) she posted 73-75 times. I dont doubt she could have emailed 41K times. She's fkn crazy
Over 5 years that’s an average of 22.5 emails a day. I believe it.
@@tabbatharenea8766 6mos is 227 a day...I wouldn't put that past her either 😳
Totally agree.
She posted 140+ times IN ONE DAY on Twitter/ X in 2018. All other days either side were similar but I couldn’t cope with the amount of scrolling.
Exactly 💯
This video is so well done! Putting all the contradictory comments back to back! Best video - outstanding!
Today called Daily Mail reporter 50x today within an hour says Piers
Piers would have been told this would happen. She is not fixed. She is dangerous and Piers has poked the bear. I understand Richard doing what he did. Its the only way he has gotten some sort of justice. Piers on the other hand...well it was entertainment to him. He gave no thought to whether she was victimising someone now and what his actions may cause.
I haven’t watched Netflix show yet, but I don’t believe her at all. Not even a little bit. This interview is problematic for her.
Watch it. Beware it is disturbing.
I watched this interview earlier today and had decided that I didn't trust her within the first 10 minutes. That feeling of distrust just grew as the interview continued. There were so many red flags!
Also, I knew disclosing her original name would bite her on the arse. I read online afterwards that by giving that info away in this interview lead others to link her with a 25 year old stalking case...
Who cares about you and whether you trust her or not? The FACTS are what matter in this so-called "true story" from Gadd and Netflix. They're failing as of now and could be out TENS OF MILLIONS OF POUNDS when she ultimately succeeds with her defamation claim.
She also says in the beginning she graduated with her law degree at the top of her class, then later says ok grades not top tier.
In Scotland, you can do an ordinary degree (no grade given except for individual modules) or do an extra “honours year” and get graded 1st class, 2:1, 2:2 or 3rd class honours. She isn’t lying - her degree was an “ordinary degree” without honours and hence she would have had to name her results from 13 modules to answer the question. If she had a photographic memory, she could obviously have done so but the grades thing is a red herring.
same in England - Piers was the one who looked stupid regarding this part. The rest of it, yeah, she was nuts :)
Can she then go on to practice law (as she has stated she did, outside of this interview ) with a non honours degree? I thought not only did you need an honours, you needed to pass the bar and then spend many years as an underpaid trainee?
@@beckiferret an ordinary degree is fine and depends on whether she claims to have been a barrister or a solicitor since we don't have lawyers
Wow, great job Andy! Well done. This was fun to watch!
I feel for anyone getting death threats there are all sorts of vile people in the world. I must say the actress who portrayed her got her 'right on'. She's bright and a non-stop talker, but she's so full of contradictions that I'm sure 99% of what they put forth in the Netflix series is absolutely true. She's obviously obsessive. she's living on benefits and has lots of time on her hands with nothing to do but obsess over people mainly men she's interested in. the Netflix film actually portrayed her sympathetically. The male character admitted that he was flattered about her never ending adoration - I guess we all could be at least initially flattered by this. She was his biggest fan. This is a money grab for Finoia, I would think she'd want to lay low.
A fantastic breakdown, this interview frustrated the heck out of me. Obvious lies and obfuscation, I broke it down at the time. I watched it and I’m so glad you made the video for me. Super job Mate.
The actress who played Martha portrayed her perfectly. There’s no hiding Martha, you’ve been caught
I'm so glad you laid it out like this! Definitely changes things when you see the contradictions side by side like this! Not to mention pointing out the body language liars portray. ✌️&💙
This whole situation makes me feel quite uncomfortable for both sides. If he went through so much as a result of her stalking in the past, why add fuel to the fire after all of these years and divert her attention and focus back to him 😔 sadly I don't feel much of anything fiona has said is the truth and most of the interview had me cringing.
He's a victim, he's entitled to share his story if he pleases. I understand where you're coming from, but the show is incredibly validating for other victims of both abuse and stalking. It brought much needed attention to these issues, especially when it comes to grooming in show business, and how dangerous stalkers could be.
Maybe to highlight the fact that there is a lot of stalking going on online and to show how evil it can get!!
This is addressed in the series at the end. Gadd is also a weirdo who craves attention and can't leave this alone and move on.
Whether or not she’s guilty or not, she’s just SCARY!
Stalkers have murdered their victims.
Its a crime , she is a perpetrator we need to stop giving her attention
Hi Andy, I'm sad to say that Sam Rubin on channel 5 news here in Los Angeles, California our comedy news caster has passed away. It was announced on live TV today May 10, 2024.
I just thought I would share this with you, I'm sure you got wind . Just so you know, IMO you hold the same talent as this awesome man .💙SAM RUBIN 💙 May you rest in Peace 🙏🏻 You will be missed from so many 🙏🏻
The shifty eyes were enough for me to be sus.
Every stalker should be exposed like that .
I'm waiting for more guys to come forward, now that she's on tv, instead of keeping her mouth shut. Pretty sure Donnie wasn't her first ' love interest'. She opened up a can of worms with this interview
Every time she says “no” she nods yes.. automatic lies.. and drinking water every minute? Enough said
Loving how you've put this together! Very good, very funny 😂
The debate panel on Piers Morgan Uncensored where they are all grasping at straws to discredit Richard Gadd and going to bat to defend Fiona really should watch your video. Excellent job editing!
Glad you had the same take away as I did. All these people saying she has a great lawsuit seems weird to me.
In the UK an "Ordinary Degree" doesn't give grades. You only get pass or fail. She's actually right about that and Piers is clueless regarding it.
In this interview she claims that she never got free drinks yet, if you read her Facebook page, there are LOADS of posts where she says how she constantly got free drinks from him. There are a million other things she states in this interview that directly contradict her Facebook posts.
Is she related to Meghanliar Market? 0:38
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Most likely, related to Amber Heard.
😅
Both are related to " Netflix" 😏
I'm glad you made this video! This is exactly what I was thinking when watching this 🙏😅
She definitely stalked his ass maybe not as bad as the film but definitely enough to call her a stalker .
I doubt he made a play for her!
If he did then he certainly was desperate.
He did. It's called monkey see monkey do. Not necessary "for" her but it's about the stalking she did to him
She went from we were friends to I don't know who this man is
I'm SO invested in this content Andy! Like a train wreck you can't tear your eyes away from 😳
Keep it coming!
Thank you for highlighting what everyone else is seeing & hearing...I've watched some panel interviews discussing her behavior etc but you've hit it spot on do diverting the truth away from what she says; her body language and behaviour.
The way she speaks she sounds like a narcissist to me, and who has 4 phones and 6 emails i only have 1 phone one email 🤔 i wasnt sure about whether she was telling the truth or not but after watching this im more inclined to say shes lying 🤔
Wow some of the comments saying they feel sorry for her, stop being horrible etc etc 😮 would they be saying the same thing if Fiona was a man?? She's already stalked a mp and her husband, she is not the victim here. Just shows you how society treats female stalkers compared to males. A man accused of stalking a female would never get the opportunity to give his side of the story 😠
Andy, you're amazing for summarizing her lies... top editing too! bravo...
Well damn now i have to subscribe so i can catch when you post the video with the lawyer lol. I finished this show in a single day, it was fantastic and learning that the main actor is also the writer and the guy who went though all of this is crazy. I literally couldnt imagine experiencing that situation.
My ears perked up when she was asked about assaulting the gf. She quickly said ~I don't know where he lives.
I didn't watch the show but is it implied or say that the assault happened at his house? So, how would she know it was at his house? Fights can breakout anywhere. It's a very specific thing to say without being privy to some knowledge of it, especially if she didn't watch Netflix. 🤔
In the show, the assault on the girlfriend happened at a restaurant or a bar
Somebody help me out here - nobody would ever have known who this woman was if she had not stepped forward to complain about this character? 🤔 So, she has a gripe about someone she really doesn’t know, about a series she has never watched, yet claiming one of the main characters is portraying her? And she is upset by it? Why??? The woman is a nut nut job. After 15 mins of fame.
I’m so confused, she confirmed she’s Martha, then says she’s not, then goes on to say …well I didn’t bother him THAT much 😂
Thank you for making this!
This is one of the best edits 😂 this interview just made it clear that she’s “Martha” lol
Oh Andy I love you , 🤣🤣, I cannot wait to hear more on this from you .
THANK YOU for making this video
Great job on this. This interview was Mr. Toads wild ride.
Jeez... I thought maybe the character in the show was exaggerated from reality.
Apparently not.
“We were all friends” . Who’s WE?
So glad you guys covering this 🤗
Brilliantly broken down, well done, very insightful 👍
She's on a spectrum. I am not sure she even realizes there is something amiss.
Meaning what?
No she's not she is portraying a character to get money and personal gain - please stop putting an excuse on someone who knows the issues and the law and broke it. She is not for sympathy or saying that she's something she's not (ASD).
Unhinged.. seriously unhinged.. careful Piers 🤣
Great breakdown! I listened to the original interview on headphones and didn't watch much, but when Piers asks some questions she makes weird "meh" sounds. It shows her dislike for the question she has to lie about.
Did anyone else catch how she also knew Pierce Morgan's exact age, and came ready to mention it, as well as his previous show on criminal cases, which she specifically references, then quickly backtracks and says she's never seen it, but maybe just one episode? She clearly sat researching Pierce too, which in and of itself isn't a big deal... If you aren't being accused of serial stalking.
Very mentally disturbed, I think she needs serious psychiatric help? You almost feel sorry for her! 😢
🩷
She needs professional help however not in the way that most people are thinking. Medication won't do much to help her. Behaviour modification and learning new coping mechanisms will however she obviously has no desire to go down that path and isn't getting that help because if she was, she would not be doing interviews. Its very difficult to treat someone like this because her behaviour works for her. She gets her needs met this way and the only way she will change is if it stops working and she is forced to try healthier methods of getting her needs met.
And because you can almost feel sorry, you forgive them for things you wouldn't normally forgive someone for. You can make allowances because you know how messed up they are and they don't even realize it. But then they abuse that empathy and make your life hell
Andy I think you are getting wrong end of the stick - she has clearly admitted that she knows Richard Gadd but is disputing her portrayal and some of the aspects of the show like her conviction. She is clearly a stalker but Netflix and Gadd have massively dropped the ball by clearly stating that this is a true story as opposed to based on or inspired by true events and opened themselves up to legal action
People are mentioning that at the end of the episode it states that some scenes were dramatised for effect. If this is the case, then she cannot sue him or Netflix.
It states, in the last episode that there was actually no conviction.
Netflix didn't name her. She outed herself. Not sure she has a case.
@@sweettea527 the legal term is jigsaw identification and whilst in form netflix/Gadd did not name her they made it so easy for the general public to identify her and thus failed in their duty of care to anonymise her. Think about the Darrian character who joe public/internet sleuths cannot identify because they hid his real identity really well and ask why they did not do the same with Martha?
Great video!! You are spot on about everything!
Absolutely brilliant!!! Great video