The Grievance Studies Affair - REVEALED
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2018
- The Reformers full series is AVAILABLE NOW at www.michaelnayna.com
Read the full papers and project fact sheet - bit.ly/2OsWnnH
This is the first video revealing the behind-the-scenes story of how a trio of concerned academics (James Lindsay, Peter Boghossian, and Helen Pluckrose) published seven intentionally absurd papers in leading scholarly journals to test the bias in certain disciplines.
If you think this project is valuable, want to see more like it, and you're in a position to help, you can support my work here - / mikenayna
For anyone uncomfortable with Patreon, one-off transfers can be made here - paypal.me/mikenayna
Anonymous crypto donations can be made here - commerce.coinbase.com/charges...
Sign-up to my mailing list for updates - eepurl.com/gl0F-v
Featuring:
James Lindsay (@ConceptualJames)
Peter Boghossian (@peterboghossian)
Helen Pluckrose (@HPluckrose)
Mike Nayna (@MikeNayna)
The Wall Street Journal's take: www.wsj.com/articles/fake-new...
Washington Post: www.washingtonpost.com/pb/out...
New York Times: www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/op...
Mother Jones: www.motherjones.com/kevin-dru...
The Times: www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jo...
The Australian: www.theaustralian.com.au/high...
Buzzfeed: www.buzzfeednews.com/article/...
Ben Shapiro May Never Stop LOLing At This: • Shapiro May Never Stop...
Associated book, Cynical Theories - www.amazon.com/Cynical-Theori... - It's an important read with huge implications if we can get it into the hands of enough people.
NOTE: This video is cleared for fair use on the provision this source video is embedded or a prominent hyperlink to this video features in your content.
#GrievanceStudies #TheyDontSpeakForMe #PeterBoghossian #JamesLindsay #HelenPluckrose #MikeNayna #SokalSquared #GrievanceStudiesAffair #GenderStudies #Feminism #Intersectionality #JoeRogan
The Reformers is AVAILABLE NOW - shorturl.at/fkvR7
For a subscription. I would totally pay a one-time fee for this information. Having people sign up for a subscription is just a way to make people forget they're spending money seems pretty predatory to me.
FYI - www.michaelnayna.com/p/exiting-the-mass-media-machine @@IamTheCaptainNow
@@MikeNayna Unless I'm misunderstanding your article, what you're trying to say by posting in this way is you've started a platform that you can use free from corporate and mainstream influences and the subscription is necessary to those ends. Would this be a sound conclusion?
Spot on, yes. The content-churn model (advertising/free to all) doesn't work for the kind of work I'm trying to do. I don't have think-tank backing because I'm ideologically odd and I'm not yet established enough to create a film in private and then release it for $10 and have costs covered. I'm hoping to get there at some point but I need to experiment with new ways of doing things and this seemingly odd Substack angle seems to be working so far.@@IamTheCaptainNow
@@MikeNayna okay, I understand that. With that said, what do you do to make sure that the subscriptions are not predatory? I only ask because the subscription service was designed to be predatory. 42% of Americans pay for subscriptions that they don't know about. Do you send out emails every month letting people know that they're about to be charged? I'm all for independent news media. I just don't think you should use the practices created by them without thorough thought. I totally will pay a subscription now that I've spoken to you as long as there are ways that you are trying to make this as transparent and forward as possible.
I'm not trying to be demanding. I understand it's your business and you can do it however you want but as somebody that's trying to go away and against the mega corporate news organizations It would be weird to use their tactics.
Possibly the most important act of trolling in history.
Second to Alan Sokal.
Are you gonna cover it Whang! ?
Agree
I'm not sure it helps much tbh but a for effort.
Maybe; but what about good ol' Alan Sokal?
Not all heroes wear capes.
I hope you do some fun video based on this.
Hero status obtained was my first thought too! I would also love your take on this, happy news time
PSA Sitch He is my old teacher!
holy shit! nice to see u here
We're less than a couple years away from "it's happening"
"a religious architecture in their mind where privilege is sin"
he's cracked the code
My philosophy teacher showed the class this video. I go to a pretty liberal college so I'm glad he has some common sense to show us this.
this should be in every liberal college!
Are you serious? This is fantastic!
They must be "I hate this teacher, we are not nazi just because we agree with hitler!"...
My university teacher showed my class this yesterday. I think it's pure gold of how dogmatic the university is.
Philosophy departments usually aren't as bad as the ones mentioned in the video.
Professor (economics) here. The truth is there are majors, and entire departments, where the relevance of the studies to reality is non-existent. There is no rigor, no scientific methodology to use, nothing to test, nothing to think... merely subjective feelings on things. These particular professors are literally unemployable outside of the government subsidized university system.
The entirety of the gender studies science is based on the false premise that all non-physical differences between genders is caused by environmental factors (as opposed to biology/genetics). Any unequal results between genders is proof of unequal treatment by society, therefore society must be changed to restore balance. Did I get this right?
@Michiel Honestly? These students take these classes because they aren't intelligent enough to succeed in real majors. Everyone was told to go to college no matter what, but once you get there and find out you weren't suited to anything practical, you take the easy way out. Unfortunately, they start to believe the fiction.
That's why Trump and Alumni should cut funding to these universities by 1/3rd and make them fight over what curriculum is actually important. Though I shudder at the thought of what some would choose.
It is not sustainable. Something needs to be done ASAP to address these pointless majors. They are literally impacting the entire economy. This is one of several reasons why students have over $20,000 in student loans to pay off.
Easy to explain. Derived Demand and The Law of Unintended Consequences.
Just like BEFORE Medicare was legislated in the 60's the elderly paid about 4% of their disposable income on healthcare, now AFTER Medicare they spend over half. Likewise, government tells greedy bankers... "don't worry about deciding on the probability these loans will EVER be paid back, we will guarantee them.." which of course guarantees banks earn a minimum low-risk profit. Politicians can say,
see, we support education and students..now vote for me so I can stay in power. .." Since free goods are always over-consumed, morons over-consume subsidized education. Many, if not most, new entering Freshmen, would have done better financially and experienced happier lives if government had not "helped" them get an embarrassing worthless degree. Hence, the degrees still exist because most university administrators are afraid to say Gender Studies as taught today in the US is bullshit and its students are non-government unemployable morons and its professors frauds.
Don't necessarily listen to me, I'm just some guy on the internet. Use your own good judgement. Take an inventory of your professors and do a thought experiment -- you own a business... how employable are they outside of government wages?... wht would they be worth per hour to your business? Do they actually know how to do anything an employer might value? Chances are good, in these sorts of bullshit disciplines, the answer is NO.. So you honestly think the students of worthless professors are generally likely to be awesome or something?
They made a feminist version of Mein Kampf and it was accepted? So, the word "feminazi" is no longer hyperbole?
Was it ever?
I wonder what section of mein kampf they rewrote and where they put it since I cant actually believe that study got accepted into a journal
Mein Kampf: Chapter 12 .Volume 1. See notes and downloadable PDF file.
@@franskat213 What's the name of the PDF file?
Yes
This needs to be a feature-length documentary.
It really does tho
There is a YT playlist: ruclips.net/p/PLLHyNSlsz449SOhzpo7ClMEKe9WkXt5GO
@@taryn2736
Thank You!
YOU get nn attaboy. ATTABOY
Or a series, this is too good!
@@taryn2736 Thank you!! 🥰🥳
and 5 years later, nobodys done a goddamn thing, and this corruption is worse than ever
Yes.
@MoltenMonsters how so specifically?
Not quite right. We are all doing the best we can and are fighting harder than ever. But the corruption is worse in spite of this effort - we just need to keep exposing it.
Sharing today with 2 connected educators hoping to stand in the way of a Western Massachusetts subversion of our school district. @@MikeNayna
PhD in Trolling 👌🏻
Critical Condition! Say whaaaaaaaa.
Literally lmao
And that kids is how to turn Trolling into an academic pursuit.
Their PhDs were aquired in the Alma matter from University of Kekistan.
It's not trolling if it's the truth.
Took a women's studies class in 2014 at age 45 and was deeply concerned about the rhetoric coming from the professor. These young girls did not have the benefit of experience to censure this prof and her never ending scorn of men and white privilege. Thanks for exposing this.
The credibility of academic institutions are failing in the general public purely because of the agenda pushed by project donators and the corruption in the methods used for publishing peer reviewed journals. The consequences of reduced credibility will mean lower enrollments, lower diversification in studies, and harmful radicalization in ideology which further polarizes the American public. Professors are not rich, they are not politically powerful, and the only think they have in status is their credibility for their area of expertise. If they wish to keep this credibility, more need to stand up with these brave professors in grievance studies to fix the academic system before they lose everything.
I took it too, and it was a man hating course. The whole thing was just about hating men, instead of celebrating women.
Ideally, in academia, the pursuit of knowledge is it's own goal. There doesn't have to be a practical application. Unfortunately, we've witnessed a hijacking of our academia to pursue ideologically driven goals to the point of false science. Their papers are trolling them and exposing the corruption of the current peer review system.
For me? In state of California, I had to take Multicultural & Genderisms class because it was required under General Education for all degrees. The class is meant for SJWs. You also can't bring cameras, videos, or tape recorders to the class or else get an F in the course. Immigration is one of the biggest topics, but also warning on the rise of alt-right Nazism. My best question for the professor was "How many jews had weapons and firearms when Hitler came to power for self defense?" She answered, "None, they took them all." I took some heat for asking that question, but it was more of a statement.. that the genocide would never have happened if they had a 2nd Amendment.
@@clarissadanae7370 guns where still allowed, only for "true" germans tho. Like how even native americans ain't seen as "true" Americans, but asian by most anglos
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools..."
Exactly right!
I’m a art student, recently I wrote a PhD proposal tackling the causality of academic corruption and its effects on the creative sector. Having my work marked by the school faculty it was met with a low grade. I then had a meeting with the staff member responsible for the mark to discuss. The response was straight forward, he claimed all the information contained in the text to be factually inaccurate despite including statements and references from dependable sources (phycologists, philosophers, feminists ect)
He seemed to take offence at my suggestion that a potential cause was intersectionality. He then rambled on about privilege, inequality and equity. He even suggested I not speak on matters of gender and sex as I’m a cis white male who has no place writing about such matters. In order for me to have had better understanding of the issue, I had to delve deep into topics which I knows would be perceived by faculty as sensitive. That’s where we are right now, stick to what we tell you, don’t poke holes in the bubble.
Wtf thats terrible!
dude, good luck!
People have learned nothing about mistreating art students...
@@yoster39 - Haha. Quite right. That has never resulted in catastrophe or...uh...genocides.
that faculty member isnt an academic, theyre an acolyte and I have nothing but disdain for them. What's more pathetic is how they claim to be against sexism, racism etc but as soon as you depart from their doctrine they will immediately discredit you on grounds of identity, particularly when (according to them) you have intersectional privilege (male, straight, white etc). Woke is the pseudo intellectual bane of current western culture. It's legitimately a cancer and it's metastasizing
I'm so thrilled that someone is putting their reputation on the line to expose this; it feels like there is nothing anyone can do on a fundamental level to stop this academic trainwreck but you all are very bravely navigating it.
Thanks - godspeed. Know that when it gets really bad, and you come under attack for this, that it only means you are getting closer to the truth.
Yep, I almost feel sorry for these people. I know the vindictiveness of the left/academia. They will be lucky to get a job as a Walmart "greeter" after this dust clears from this...
"We rewrote a section of Mein Kampf as intersectional feminism and this journal has accepted it."
LMAO
I know it's crazy. But I don't really find it funny. This is history repeating it self. The white male is becoming the hated jew in Nazi Germany. I don't find that funny at all.
mi raz he dude chill, he's just saiyan
This indoctrination is based off the Frankfurt School.
This is an exercise everyone should do. Take feminist posts/articles and replace men/white men/male/patriarchy with blacks/muslims/black/black culture/islam and check the result. Most of the times it sounds like something straight out of hardcore neo-nazi groups.
no he's super saiyan.
I come back to this video every now and then...
4:28 "We rewrote a section of mein Kampf as intersectional feminism and this journal accepted it."
LET
THAT
SINK
IN
It exposes a LOT of hate... And interestingly they are the one talking about so much hate speech in society...
I saw an interview with James, Peter and Helen describing what they did specifically. They took that section and every instance that Hitler wrote "Jew" they substituted "white male". THAT got published.
Mein Kampf as intersectional feminism????
I almost fell of my chair!
It is even more delicious if you consider that they literally put "mein Kampf" (my struggle) in the title of the paper. They named it "Our struggle is my struggle". It's absolutely hilarious... and scary at the same time.
The joke is that most people, who aren't familiar how far off the deep end these "studies" have gone, will claim you're a conspiracy theorist if you compare their rhetoric to the antisemitic rhetoric of pre World War academia.
Ron Yeahwiggie im not surprised.
It's not that suprising.
Nazis were socialist like their name say. Also Benito Mussolini were a socialist, he were active member of the Italian Socialist party before creating the Fascist party.
Communists, maxists and others are socialists as well.
Here is a video of antifa applaudind a speech made from Hitler quotes. (Hitler didn't wrote the "were are socialists..." but he did use it)
ruclips.net/video/qNMAp8kXWrc/видео.html
This may be the most important sociological study in the 21st century. You guys are truly heroic.
They should get some Nobel prices, including Nobel peace price.
@@aleksinuutila2315 lol. That would be the champagne moment.
Joseph Braun The worst thing about the experiment is how many people believe it was successful at all. They submitted 20 papers, made 50 resubmissions, and only got 4 papers published before being exposed. It’s not an effective critique of “grievance” studies since they could’ve made the experiment with equal outcome in any area of research without question. It’s also not an effective critique of ideological bias in “grievance” studies since they never even attempted publishing papers with different kinds of ideology. It’s not even an effective critique of science in general since getting a paper published is meaningless if it’s not even cited by anyone. According to the authors, their intent was literally to expose ideological bias in science and in the end... only their own bias is apparent. Let’s summarise: politically driven amateurs attack scientific journals, even though they didn’t have any scientific reasoning... and this is apparently heroic for reason X? Because it’s framed as revealing an ideological agenda? To clarify: in this video they allege they’ve uncovered an agenda where only politically fashionable papers are accepted... but they never even ATTEMPTED that! They never included politically unfashionable papers as controls. They also suggest their garbage research could influence universities or politicians, when in reality you can publish randomly generated nonsense if you really wish... however, nobody will cite or even read it! Passing pre-publication peer review is only the first stage of peer review and they were CAUGHT!
@@theespatier4456 thE WORsT tHINg abOUt tHE eXpeRImenT IS How MAnY PeOPle bELIeVE iT WAs SUCceSSfUL aT ALL. THEY SuBmItTEd 20 PaPERS, mADe 50 REsUbMISsioNs, aND OnLy got 4 papERs pUBLisHED BEfORe beINg ExpoSed. IT’S NOt AN EfFeCTIve CRItIQuE of “grIeVAncE” StUDiES siNcE tHEY cOULD’ve mADe the ExperiMEnt WITH eqUAl OUtCoME iN anY Area OF rEsEaRch WIthOut QUESTion. It’S alSO nOt an EffECtiVE Critique Of ideologIcAl bIas iN “griEvaNCe” sTUdIES sINce thEy nEvER eVEn aTtEmPTed pUBlIshInG pAPerS wITh DIfFerent KINDS Of iDEoLOgy. IT’S nOT even An EFfeCTIVE cRITique of ScIeNcE in GeneRal Since GeTTing A PaPER PuBLISHED IS MEaningleSs iF It’s NOT eVen citeD by ANyOnE. acCOrdINg to tHe Authors, theIR inTEnt waS liTERaLLy TO eXPoSE iDEOLoGIcal bIAs iN scIeNCE And In THE enD... OnlY TheIr owN Bias IS ApPARENt. let’S SUMMArIse: poLitiCAlLy dRiveN AmaTeURs AttACK ScIENtIfIc joUrnalS, eVEn ThOUgh
All my admiration and thanks to you Helen, James and Peter. You have shown wit, integrity, but above all courage.
As a philosopher of meta ethics, I thank you for this. I’ve been noticing this bias trend in academia for quite some time and it has caused me to distance myself from any ‘academic’ institutions.
This needs to be a 2-hour documentary right now
I award you all a blue ribbon for the most impressive crop ever produced in the history of meme farming.
Reddit's greatest meme lords pale in comparison, and forchan's offerings fail to impress.
This is one of the most insane, crazy and hilarious things I have ever seen which also raises a really valid point. Great job to all of you involved. I hope this gives people a much needed reality check on what is actually getting published in these journals
Lol, “PhD.”
I believe Orwell said, it’s “so incredible, only an intellectual could believe it.”
There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.
"There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs."
-- Dr. Thomas Sowell
You guys realize that this video doesn't prove anything, right? They published some false papers. That is fairly possible. The findings in those papers are not taken as dogma or anything. If you publish something, afterwards there will be other research teams looking up your paper, and then they will test themselves, and publish their findings. Only way your findings are considered relevant is if a plurality of scientific research comes to the same conclusions.
@@hugosilva400 @Hugo Silva Every single sentence you said is 100% false and the opposite is true.
*You guys realize that this video doesn't prove anything, right? They published some false papers.*
False! This video proves that people with agendas are publishing nonsense for millions to read, rather than publishing properly vetted science.
*The findings in those papers are not taken as dogma or anything.*
False! The finding in the papers are most certainly taken by millions of people who share the same ideologies as dogma. Every time a new article is published, people read them and when the article jives with their currently held beliefs, they become even more steadfast in their beliefs. This is true for a large portion of the scientific community as well.
*If you publish something, afterwards there will be other research teams looking up your paper, and then they will test themselves, and publish their findings.*
False! 80% of studies and papers coming from the humanities departments in Universities have zero citations. They are finding that a small percentage of even the hard science papers are peer reviewed and in the rare instance that they do, the peer review is not rigorous and on many occasions, and in most instances the results end up not matching the original findings. There are some non-profit organizations that exist whose sole purpose is to peer review studies. They have tried to peer review many studies and articles on Climate Change and when they get results that do not match, they will try to reach out to the authors of the original study and they find that only about 10% of their phone calls get returned. I personally know a guy who became an oral surgeon who was involved in an oral cancer research project that was lead by a University professor for his doctorate thesis. The results of the testing they were performing was showing a massive like 85% rate of cancer growth in tissue when exposed to a certain chemical. They eventually found that the machines they were using were giving false readings. The professor told him to publish the results anyway without reporting that the tests were being run incorrectly. The truth is that very few studies and research papers are carefully scrutinized, peer reviewed, and verified.
*Only way your findings are considered relevant is if a plurality of scientific research comes to the same conclusions.*
False! Very few studies are actually peer reviewed and verified properly these days. News stations around the world will have a "science" segment and they will have a supposed journalist pick up a "scientific study" in these "scientific journals" that they like and they will do a segment on it. Millions of regular people will watch the segment and this will stick in their minds. When there are thousands of news stories like this, public perception begins to change on a mass scale. This is why we are seeing millions upon millions of people believing all this nonsense about gender fluidity and more, and it is beginning to change the culture and affect people directly as well as influencing government operations. Here are three examples of junk science that is harming people and culture and government.
A while ago a real scientist wanted to know if the Energy Star certification by the government meant anything. He created a fake invention that was a "gasoline powered alarm clock". He submitted the documentation to the Energy Star department. A short while later he received a phone call from the department and they simply asked him if his claims were true. He said, "yes", and he was granted the right to put the Energy Star logo on his fake alarm clock.
There are many "studies" that have been done on BPA, food irradiation, and GMOs that have been proven false or inconclusive, but BPA, GMOs and food irradiation are being banned by governments anyway. Even the ultra radical Left government of Canada could not find any major issues with BPA, but they banned it anyway because of public pressure.
And finally about 10ish years ago, there was a new fake diet that came out. The Coffee and Butter diet. Supposedly a "scientist" created a diet where you take half a cup of strong black coffee and add a full stick of butter to it and you drink it and it is supposed to make you lose weight. During the new story I heard, the journalist said at the end, "this diet only works when you have free-range, grass fed, organic butter.". The instant that she said that, I knew that the diet was BS. Millions of people started to try this new "diet". Sure enough a year or two later I saw another real scientist prove how easy it is to get fake science published. He assembled a small group of people and gave them chocolate. Some of them did indeed lose some weight. He published, "the new chocolate diet", and sure enough, the news media read the article and started pushing it out like it was truth.
One of the guys who is the owner of one of these supposed "reputable" scientific journals was interviewed by John Stossel about his journal publishing this fake science. You are in just as much denial as he was.
@@karozans I'm not in denial cuz I published a paper, and I know the digging I had to do in regards to finding citations. What you said is bs. Find me papers, that are academically relevant, without citations. I'll be waiting. And I reject your premise that people take any scientific conclusion as dogma as sson as its published. That is blatant pseudoscience, research teams are continuously doing this work of repeating someone else's research. That is what most scientific research teams do. I ask you to prove your assertions with any evidence. Provide me links to academically relevant studies without citations (good luck with that, cuz any paper without citations is a fucking joke) and something that proves a scientific fact was deemed as so without any compelling evidence, just based on 1 or 2 studies made by the same biased research team.
This is one of the most awesome takedowns of post-modernist crap ever. I salute each and every one of you and you each deserve a medal, or tenure.
N S takedown btw lol 99% of people I know believe all this garbage
bishes be mad dumbass
What the hell is "postmodern" supposed to mean?
@@chadthundercock4982 It's a current of philosophy.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism
This is a take down of academia and academics. Fuck those people. They have no idea what they are doing or talking about, but the public is bullied into acting like they do.
"Grievance Studies." Brilliant. Looking forward to the rest of this.
3:11 "Religious architecture"
Perfectly stated!
I don't know whether to laugh or to cry. they accepted Mein Kempf that's horrible! but your idea for this project and video is GENIUS!
How do you like the new religion? It looks like grievance studies found a way around the separation of church and state.
:) social justice is being taught k-12 in ontario the priming is there.
Give these heroes some eye lasers
The crusades brought to the USA . Kill the heretics
This is not religious thinking - it is ideological thinking.
@@martqbd The crusades were a defensive war against an invasion.
You sacrificed a lot to show this, I hope it gets spread far and wide.
Thanks Steven
I’m a grad student in the humanities at NYU and this is honestly the best thing I’ve seen since starting my career.
This needs more views =\
I'm 100% sure the RUclips algorithm is working overtime to make sure that nobody who isn't DIRECTLY linked here will EVER see this video in their recommendations.
I'm simultaneously overjoyed that you exposed this and horrified by your results
This is absolutely fucking shocking and incredible. Thank you SO MUCH for doing this!
Not really shocking, considering how they are (for years) statistics that have been debunked over and over and over again (most prominent examples: all the 1 in 4/ 1 in 5 statistics and the wage gap)
@@11mousa yeah it's 1/3 for girls and boys
This is insane! Well done highlighting this. I hope it leads to increased public awareness and discussion. That a lot of this happens in echo chambers behind closed doors before getting actively implemented without even being questioned is pretty scary.
4 years have passed, and things got much worse. Woke lunacy spilled out from academia into everyday life, from big corporations to the White House itself. Male rapists all of a sudden start "identifying" as women when they get arrested and they get placed in cells with their victims. A man is a female NCAA swimming champion. Hormone therapy and puberty blockers for children. Disgusting racists provide "training" on white privilege for corporation employees. Etc. etc. And the sheeple don't seem to mind. This country might be past the point of no return.
I wish Last Week Tonight would have the balls to cover something like this.
They don't
Exactly, I really liked it and also Hasan Minhaj and now it seem they both have become sermon services from the chruch of woke.
F'n brilliant. Thank you. Their shameful unscrupulousness deserves to be exposed. "If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth." -Carl Sagan
I've been saying for years that this was a religion. It has all the aspects. That would make a good paper. Love the work. Keep it up.
Yes! John McWhorter has a book on it coming out this month, subtitled "How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America".
These are called "political religions" or "secular religions". Publishing about this, however, may make you a target of the animosity of their following.
It's the Spirit of Anti Christ at work in these Telling times. AKA Tribulations. Right is wrong and WRONG IS RIGHT!?? The Author of Confusion Reigns temporarily..Amen
I'm a social conservative and I think your work is amazing. I work in the biological sciences and have been shocked at how agendas are pushed in academia - especially when they touch on things such as the biological foundation for behavioural traits such as homosexuality. The conclusions in these areas have already been decided and as such only research that supports this is accepted
Yep! That Kinsey guy was a real upstanding serious scientist with moral and academic integrity, all right! Let’s all build on his rock solid work. Probably an oversimplification, but am I wrong?
As a legal academic who's seen thousands of people summarily tried by Social Justice Department tribunals on campus I've been describing identity politics of this nature as a New Faith (TM) since around 2005 when it first really established itself in my country. Complete with original sin (being straight, white, or male) and a priestly class paid to absolve people who contribute financially to have their sin prayed away. Just like all fundamentalist religion everyone is 'born sick' and needs to be prayed well. It's a cult, plain and simple. And it controls mass media, academia, government, almost all institutions. It rewards devotion and ignorance, and discourages questioning or investigation of facts. You're also expressly not allowed legal representation at their tribunals ironically.
Which campuses?
bashpr0mpt The worst thing about the experiment is how many people believe it was successful at all. They submitted 20 papers, made 50 resubmissions, and only got 4 papers published before being exposed. It’s not an effective critique of “grievance” studies since they could’ve made the experiment with equal outcome in any area of research without question. It’s also not an effective critique of ideological bias in “grievance” studies since they never even attempted publishing papers with different kinds of ideology. It’s not even an effective critique of science in general since getting a paper published is meaningless if it’s not even cited by anyone. According to the authors, their intent was literally to expose ideological bias in science and in the end... only their own bias is apparent. Let’s summarise: politically driven amateurs attack scientific journals, even though they didn’t have any scientific reasoning... and this is apparently heroic for reason X? Because it’s framed as revealing an ideological agenda? To clarify: in this video they allege they’ve uncovered an agenda where only politically fashionable papers are accepted... but they never even ATTEMPTED that! They never included politically unfashionable papers as controls. They also suggest their garbage research could influence universities or politicians, when in reality you can publish randomly generated nonsense if you really wish... however, nobody will cite or even read it! Passing pre-publication peer review is only the first stage of peer review and they were CAUGHT!
Brett Anthony What sense does it make to equate all publishing? You may as well include non peer-reviewed publishing then, in which case literally anyone can publish literally anything. Only because something is printed in black on white that doesn’t make it any truer. In order to be influential, especially in order to influence higher education like the hoaxsters say in the video, papers must be published in high ranking journals or no one will read it.
What this video doesn’t tell you is that one of the papers they published only got published in a journal that ranks in top 2244th place among social science journals... in other words they got published in a journal that’s not even in the top 2000! And they describe these as high ranking and even “leading” journals.
@@theespatier4456 Copy and paste the same lie moar.
hippyjason Are personal attacks all you have?
This is a work of some genius. I like the fact that they actually had to get good at writing the papers (however insane the content) to make it through the initial 'filters'.
Glorious stuff - maximum kudos to all three.
My daughter just started JK. My wife and I are terrified for this very reason. Thank you for doing this extremely important work.
What's JK?
Save up money for a private high school (and middle school if you can) instead of saving for college.
You are missing Psychology. The field of Psychology has been corrupted to the point that the whole field is in danger of becoming harmful rather than helpful.
Amen
faultroy
It’s not just women who are struggling with their everyday, it’s various people (men and women who are from various cultures and backgrounds).
Faultroy that was the dumbest shit I've ever read. "Hurr durr muh irrational WOMEN REEEE". Citation needed. I'm surprised you didn't actually call them femoids.
@faultroy TL;DR FeMOiDs aRE DeStROyiNg SCieNcE!!111!!!!1!
Like, holy fuck, why did 18 people like that?
But seriously, science tip #1: correlation =/= causation. People feel much less ashamed of getting psychiatric help and there is much more help available these days, so the numbers are increasing. It's just like how coronavirus diagnoses spiked when testing increased. It was representative of the amount of testing, not number of cases. And society still isn't great about not shaming men for showing emotions, so less men consider getting help for mental illness as a viable option in the first place. What's really concerning is the increasing suicide rates, which is dominated by men :/ That's a real sign that they're not getting the help they need and it's heartbreaking.
That could be said only of social psychology.
Other fields ar great and objective tools that are fighting against PC authoritarianism that you described.
Perfect examples are Personality psychology, Cognitive psychology, neuro-psychology, and so on...
Thank you so much. I live in Chicago, worked till I was 35 and then went back to finish up my degree. It has been an eye opening experience to have Professors not want to discuss ideas.
Jonathan Swift: "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
Well done. I'm glad more people are documenting this insanity.
Peter resigning today is sad for the academic field. I don't hold it against him that 3 years after this he resigned. I can only imagine the hopelessness.
Thank you for looking into this, the whole story sends shivers down my spine
I cannot thank you enough for this. Literally crying out of joy.
Petter Nerman The worst thing about the experiment is how many people believe it was successful at all. They submitted 20 papers, made 50 resubmissions, and only got 4 papers published before being exposed. It’s not an effective critique of “grievance” studies since they could’ve made the experiment with equal outcome in any area of research without question. It’s also not an effective critique of ideological bias in “grievance” studies since they never even attempted publishing papers with different kinds of ideology. It’s not even an effective critique of science in general since getting a paper published is meaningless if it’s not even cited by anyone. According to the authors, their intent was literally to expose ideological bias in science and in the end... only their own bias is apparent. Let’s summarise: politically driven amateurs attack scientific journals, even though they didn’t have any scientific reasoning... and this is apparently heroic for reason X? Because it’s framed as revealing an ideological agenda? To clarify: in this video they allege they’ve uncovered an agenda where only politically fashionable papers are accepted... but they never even ATTEMPTED that! They never included politically unfashionable papers as controls. They also suggest their garbage research could influence universities or politicians, when in reality you can publish randomly generated nonsense if you really wish... however, nobody will cite or even read it! Passing pre-publication peer review is only the first stage of peer review and they were CAUGHT!
@@theespatier4456 What these people were able to do was significant...very significant. They made their point even if you don't think so.
@@DanielCardin_ATX ~ Dude. No. This is not how you debate/debunk a comment that makes those kinds of specific points. Saying "it WAS significant, I know it was" is the kind of dumb and obvious confirmation bias I'm seeing up and down this comments section. I think it's great they did this little stunt and I think it was worthwhile. I don't know the details except for this short video and neither do you. When someone bothers to give factual, expert input (I mean, certainly more expert than you), you can't debunk by saying "nuh uh."
@@alibobali4032 Your use of the word “expert” tells most of the story. You are quite wrong to suggest that my knowledge of these great professors’ work is limited to this single video. It’s something I have known about for about two years. Furthermore it’s not just a stunt. In one interview, Peter Boghossian admits it was not nearly as easy as he had thought it would be. The fact remains however that four articles which were obvious rubbish-by-design were published in these nonsense peer reviewed academic journals. I will go so far as to say it illuminates a problem that is extremely pervasive in all things connected to the modern University. Just a bunch of narcissistic fools patting each other on the back and citing each other’s nonsense. That’s what’s happening in the social sciences at each and every university that I know of.
@@theespatier4456 “We didn’t lose... they had 20 shots on target and only scored four goals...” lol
But it was a lot worse than that.
The hoax was uncovered and brought to a halt prematurely. Another three papers had been accepted but hadn’t been published yet. (So from those 20 shots on target, it was actually SEVEN that beat the keeper.)
Another seven had yet to be decided. Only six were rejected.
If the peer review process were a sports team, it’d be US women’s soccer when they got hammered by those under-15 kids.
Yep, social justice is a cult.
not an argument
"No u" is all they got on this claim.
Social Terrorism*
From ESG TURKEY
Joe Rogen sent me here - happy to be here. this is pure win.
This is a work of art.
Exactly why all Women and Gender Studies courses nationwide need to have all funding cut both State and Federal.
Seriously.
It has already been down in my neighboring country, Norway, after the documentary Hjaernevask (Brainwashing) exposed the gender "science" as the pure quackery it is ... and thanks to these three heroes I believe it will soon come to Sweden as well. Ironically enough, I also think that the crescendo of perversion, MeToo, will actually help liberate the world from religious feminism.
WickedDealer Cutting the funding isn’t going to make the standards go up. If anything it would probably embolden the people because they can spin it as repressing the truth. The reality is they get funding because people attend these classes. When people don’t attend they get cut.
jojo boko If we put new laws in place for Student Loans it would stop it almost entirely. When you force someone to actually justify what kind of job there "degree" can actually be used for which in the case of Women and Gender Studies it's either becoming a professor to indoctrinate more youth into that cult or it's screaming on the street corners bitching about the "Patriarchy". In either case funding cut and if you wanna take the courses pay for them yourselves out of pocket and learn what real equality is. It's a Win Win all the way around and this stupid bullshit will die out in a generation or so.
The rot has also spread to the DoE, if it didn't even start there.
This is the best thing to come out of acedamia in a decade.
They didn't even bother submitting to high ranking journals because they knew they'd get rejected, so they went after shit-tier low ranked academic journals and still got rejected most of the time. So important to know that middling and pay to post academic journals aren't very circumspect.
@@garr123 They only really got rejected most of the time IF you count the papers they wrote before they figured out the "language" and the ones that were still in process at the time that they were found out.
By "language" you mean "lying about having extensive empirical research" and "making up data."
And they still got rejected by or never bothered submitting to any journal worth a damn.
The journals submitted to were either low tier bullshit that will publish anything or low impact factor meta-commentary/postmodern journals that don't have much meaningful influence in the field because they publish things far outside the mainstream with far less rigorous review.
Call me when they get published in Mind.
@@garr123 hi! by "language", I meant exactly what they described in this video about the difference between their first 6 "hoax" papers and what they learned about [blaming people's privilege for those people's inappropriate desire to not be chained to the floor or something] that helped them write papers with the minimum necessary level of complete poo.
As for your other comments, they are irrelevant to what I was interested in commenting on, so you do you.
thanks for the reply! be well.
This video is a pile of bullshit. You can look up what journals they were accepted to and they sure as hell aren't top journals of the field. Top journals would be like Ethics, Mind, Philosophical Review, and Nous. If I recall, they didn't bother submitting to any of them, probably because they knew they'd be rejected flat out due to their extensive peer review process.
Even going after low ranking journals, falsifying data, and trying to abuse the peer review system by editing based on the critiques of higher ranked journals (the "language"), then submitting the edited versions to lower ranked journals, their papers still only had a 33% acceptance rate and a good portion of the accepted papers flat out made up data to look like they'd done legitimate, empirical research.
Don't be so gullible.
i showed this to my family and we just had the most civil and honest conversation about politics in months. Thank you.
OMG I read a story about that dog park paper when it came out. I fit in so well with all their other craziness I never even suspected. Not sure if I should be ashamed for being tricked, or they should be ashamed for being indistinguishable from a joke paper.
Thank all of you for doing this despite the risk, this is some really damning stuff
Just sponsored the documentary through PayPal. Sorry, can't use Patreon, they're in the mix with the bad guys.
@Jay L Calm down.
Hysterical. If only more academics had you guys' courage. And it looks like it ends up being pretty fun and the end of it all!
The problem is that academics with similar leanings (towards, you know, reality) have a hard time getting a job in the academy. I've recently been told by my HoD that even though my classes are enormously popular (they are literally the largest 2nd and 3rd year options we offer, year in and year out!), that the department is 'not likely to expand in your area' and instead is looking to expand more into 'gender' in the coming hiring cycle.
This is in a major history department with global (or fairly global) recognition.
Well a lot of them are frauds making money as professional SJWs
I think you mean hilarious, but I agree that these people's courage is really encouraging!
This is crazy, but as a teacher I'm not overly surprised. Thank you for your work
FANTASTIC WORK!!! Honestly this is worth of the highest praise in academics.
He's got a Zelda t-short, the true hero of Hyrule!
Bless those people. Somebody had to do it!
I love all of you. This is amazing. This is glorious.
I've suspected as much. I'm a female and I basically turned my back on feminism when my experiences in the male dominated fields didn't match their rhetoric. I've been in martial arts for over 20 years. You would think that I would experience some form of blatant sexism by now, especially if it's as prevalent as they say, but other than a minor harassment by the occasional chauvinist jerk, I can't really recall any other than the boy who spit on me, but I just punched him in the face and that was the end of that. If I were surrounded by sexist males, then they weren't doing a good job being sexist.
So I started listening to these stories to see what they were talking about and basically came to the conclusion that there are two types of sexism: significant and insignificant. Significant is what everyone thinks when they hear sexism. It's the environment being hostile and toxic to women. It's when you got the one guy who keeps touching the girls and the boss just down plays it. That's significant because that's clear harassment and affects a woman's ability to do her job. It also has a risk of escalation and it shows this particular worker has poor judgement if he feels he can touch a woman simply because she's a woman.
However, most so called sexism doesn't fit this description. Most is what I call "Insignificant." Cat calling is an example. That's stupid, but where does some homeless guy winking at me and saying "Hey baby," hurting me? He's probably mentally ill and maybe not meaning anything by it. Certainly it by itself isn't a problem. The guy bragging about how many girls he's done, despite what he thinks is insignificant. He's just a jerk. But yet women are trying to put this kind of sexism on the same level as as the former, and you can't just do that. Because they are not the same.
TheRisky9 The irony of it all is if the modern feminists had it their way they would have a world where no man would dare speak to, look at or ever think of touching a woman due to it being "too risky".
Flirting? Nope. They will flock to social media and accuse you of victimizing them with unwanted attention and then bully you (because exploiting victim status means you get a free pass to engage in worse behavior than the accuser).
Looking at them? Nope. Not even when they dress provocatively, because they are only doing that for themselves and you are NOT allowed to notice OR make comments (good or bad), despite them making it all a public display.
Going out on a date and "think" of holding her hand or kissing her? Nope. And definitely do NOT sleep with the woman, because the chance of your career and life being ruined when said person gets "political" somewhere down the road and "remembers" what was once consensual was really "you raping them" is too great.
@@Ingerimm
They are self-instigating humanocide. Maybe they think they are solving the world's overpopulation problem. Useful idiots.
@Ingerimm
I agree. It's a power play. Women have always used sexuality to control men and this is no different. We women have always had men by the balls, so to speak. It's a tried and true tactic dating back millenniums. Just look at Joseph and Pottipher's wife in the Book of Genesis. It's no wonder to me that men are doing as Joseph did and running.
Now they're even saying that women can revoke consent after the fact. That's absurd! I can already revoke consent at anytime I feel uncomfortable or if something tips me off that it's just a bad idea.
But after the fact? No. The time to realize something is a bad idea is before you do it! Once you do it, it falls into the "What's done is done" category. Then everything that happens after that falls into the "Too bad" category. Oh, you got pregnant from that one night stand with that guy who was really bad in bed? That's too bad. You woke up and realized that you did something stupid and that jerk you did it with just walked away while you're still sleeping? Too bad!
Yes, teach men not to rape. However, I think it's worthwhile to teach women to use good judgement. Teach them that you can say no and you don't owe anyone sex for anything. Let's use our sexuality in healthy ways. Understand the consequences of sex and the hook up culture. You might find that sleeping with every man that crosses your path isn't as empowering as you think. You can't erase all the consequences.
What is even worse is that feminists find okay to do what they call out men for doing, because they have an history of being oppressed so now it's their turn. They can objectify men, they can catcall, they can interrupt, they can hit and abuse. The double standard is disgusting.
@Kroww Jager. Yes, exactly. It's a tit for tat when it comes to the relationship between men and women. Feminists want to put the entire burden of their safety and peace of mind on men. Well, if everyone is responsible for you but you, then that's just not going to work. This is only going to work if we meet each other halfway. The golden rule still applies. And that includes our attitudes towards each other. What's the difference between a guy who just groped a woman and said "She deserves it because of what she's wearing" and a woman groping a man saying, "Well we went through this and so you have to now." To me, there's no difference. It's both sexual assault. It's clearly not a misunderstanding, like a boyfriend groping me and me not being in the mood so I ask him to stop. It's an intentional assault and using something stupid as an excuse.
I remember getting into an argument on the internet. A question was brought up in a writing forum about how come more males suffer death in literature. It's an interesting topic. In my opinion, it's just literature mirroring real life like it's supposed to. Men are more likely to die violent deaths then women. And I brought up the data to support that, which included sexual assault and domestic violence statistics.
For the most part, it was great. Most people were surprised about the statistics, but were opened to see my sources and find out for themselves. But there was this one chump who, I am not kidding you said, "Well, how does that happen? How can a woman physically overpower a man?" Basically, "Because I don't have the imagination to see how that happens, I'm going to deny statistics taken by the Department of Criminal Justice. BTW, I'm still a writer despite having no imagination." Which, doesn't work if you're a writer. When you're a writer, you don't argue the facts, you bring them to life. Whether that be piecing together a true story or writing a piece of fiction when you can't find the story. And maybe that's why so many SJWs are terrible writers. They're told "The world is unfair to marginalized people" then they read the facts and find there's more to it then just things being unfair. But they don't want to have to potentially let go of their beliefs, so they come up with these outlandish scenarios in their story telling that are just ridiculous.
“My collaborators and I are left-wing academics who can now say with confidence : those people don’t speak for us” Thank you so much! At that point, we all have to stand up and yell it out loud! What you have done is remarkable!
My greatest applaud and support goes out to these heroes. Thank you for doing this.
I laughed so hard I fell out of mein kampfy chair!
**slow clap**
Nicely done
#dropsmic
hilarious
'NOT ZEE KAMPFY CHAIR!!!'
Absolute mad lads. Well done.
Casey Sheppard well hello there friendo. Fancy seeing you here
Hah! Indeed. Especially since I got zucced.
I can't wait to watch this when it's done... What an awesome project!
Thanks guys for the efforts, risks and results
The reactions from the journals described in the WSJ article are also quite interesting: They first and foremost regret not checking the identity of the authors more thoroughly... not a single word about these absolutely ridiculous papers actually slipping through their peer review process. Hypatia's reaction is the worst:
""Referees put in a great deal of time and effort to write meaningful reviews, and the idea that individuals would submit fraudulent academic material violates many ethical and academic norms,” she said. “It is equally upsetting that the anonymous reviewer comments from that effort were shared with third parties, violating the confidentiality of the peer-review process.” Wiley, Hypatia’s publisher, is investigating in accordance with industrywide ethical guidelines, she said.""
In other words: Not a single shred of regret, let alone introspection, just deflection and an immediate counter-attack.
My prediction: The journals, spearheaded by Hypatia and backed by the various branches of "academia" plagued by this post-modernist subversion as well as the whole SJW-mob on social media, will play the victim-card and create a huge outrage about the unethical nature of the hoax, will throw as much dirt as possible at Pluckrose, Lindsay and Boghossian via social media using the usual sexistracisthomophobe slanders and push for harsh legislation and punishment for these kind of hoaxes. Wanna bet?
and if they do, i can only hope other people will pick up on it and start to employ the very same strategy pluckrose, lindsay and boghossian have utilized, further inhibiting the fields of grievance study by coming out as hoaxes, ultimately (hopefully) dismantling this entire sham...
one can hope.
That's why the proponents of these fields will push for harsh punishments and will try to make an example out of Pluckrose, Lindsay and Boghossian by unpersoning them via social and mainstream media. As I predicted in my previous post, various professors of these fields aready have lashed out at them on social media, smearing them as alt-right and labelled the hoax a "coordinated right wing attack". They even have tied them to Gamergate, ffs. The next step will be a barrage of slanderous articles by the Guardian, WaPo, NYT, Vox, Vice, Slate etc., just give them a day or two.
There will be no introspection whatsoever, on the contrary: they will double and triple down.
I don't want to bet. You nailed it.
Let's be vigilant in fighting back. Their guard is down, now is the time to strike!
I'm not left leaning at all. I'm sure I would disagree with many of what these professors would have to say. However I gotta hand it to them. They're doing what no one else on the left seems to want to do, and that's weed out the extreme nonsense on their side of the fence.
The moderate folks on the right did this to their extremists a long time ago. I don't recall anyone jumping on a klan bandwagon for a good long while and of course guys like Timothy McVeigh were treated like the terrorists they were.
That's what you have to do. You have to separate yourself from the radicals because whether they lean radically left or right, the end result is the same. There's a reason third wave feminism and Mein Kamf fit so well together.
These professors did what all of us should be doing. They used their own intellect and thinking power to seek the truth. Hopefully the rest of us can follow that trend instead of the chaos of the extremes.
I agree with that, except where is this same realisation on the right...the worst of the right is currently in power! Gun nuts, religion nuts, anti-science morons who think climate change is a hoax created by the chinese, people who hate homosexuals and wave confederate flags...these people currently run the Republican party. As crazy as these elements of the left are, they are mainly confined to some insignificant gender studies classes, they are not running the Democratic party. Indeed Obama, when he was president, called for colleges to stop with the safe space culture.
That's the big difference between the Left and the right. When someone on the right goes to extremes, that are called out by the right. When someone on the left goes to extremes, they are usually ignored or even defended by the left.
Right now in Portland There are people out blocking streets and protesting because cops shot a black gang banger who was involved in a gunfight with other gang bangers. They cat like somehow the police are at fault for this. Another example is a man walked up to two cops and stabbed one of them You can guess how that ended. Now the family is demanding justice for the guy who was shot for killing the cop. He already got the justice he deserved!
I know there are some accidental shootings that happen, but most of those can be prevented by NOT giving you kids replica handguns to play with out in the public. If you want real justice for the people who are wrongfully killed, stop making a big deal out of all the people who are justifiably killed by the police. It is to the point where no one listens to them anymore because 99% of it is bullshit..
This is a good example of the feral left changing overtime, thus making people on the right, center, or even left of center look like nazis or "alt-right" or whatever the term is. Even though those people haven't changed, the left is constantly pushing further into the extreme, hence why they start cannibalizing themselves.
The problem is that the radical left is being tolerated by liberals. This video is yet another example. The radical right however is not being tolerated by conservatives. I hate the radical right and radical left equally. I respect moderate left and right equally. I myself lean right.
@@Avarioth sorry I forgot I had one other thing to say about the first thing I quoted you on - about never seeing anyone else act or behave like that.
Like I said earlier, I think those pride parades are, amongst other things, a chance for people to get a little wild, let loose and celebrate. But they're not the only ones to do something like this. Have you ever been out on St.Patrick's Day? People "getting a little wild" would be putting it mildly. People take that opportunity to be the drunken fuckin idiot that isn't so much acceptable throughout the rest of the year. Things happen on that day that you'd never normally see. Otherwise average folks turn into debaucherous heathens. So there's one example. And do you think that the public at large associates that kind of behavior with what the daily lifestyle of all Irish people? I mean, for some of them that's gonna be true, but (it should be) obviously not _all_ of them.
Or howabout spring break or Mardi Gras? Definitely some pretty wild behavior there, right? But as much as I'd like it to be the case, I can't go up to a group of college-age girls on any given day, chuck some cheap bead necklaces at them and expect for them to graciously show me their tits. Goddamit I wish but, that's just not how reality works.
Rhetorically speaking, I dunno why it's so acceptable now to speak of groups of people in such general terms - to paint them with such a wide brush. I see most everybody doing it and I just don't get it. How has a well known logical fallacy (hasty generalization) become the norm in current public (or at least online) discourse? It's not a good habit to get into imo. It's never really gonna lead to _good_ things..
Thank you for doing this. I am a big lefty but this is sending us waaay back v
I love this. I love this so much. This IS going in my BEST OF RUclips playlist.
EXCELLENT. Sanity speaks.
Excellent work - thank you for doing this!
This is scary. Thank you for showing and good luck with your quest.
Thank you for trying to bring dignity and integrity back into the sciences! You guys are a shining light.
I do not know if there is an academic equivalent to the Pulitzer Prize, but if there is, you guys most certainly deserve it.
YES! Real liberals are BACK! Thank you!!!
Classical-liberalism is the true American center. It is why the country was created.
What has this to do with liberalism?
@@thechadeuropeanfederalist893 they're liberating our minds from the shackles of fraud, deception, and corruption.
Realize that it shares a root with "liberty" and you'll begin to get the picture.
@@thechadeuropeanfederalist893 The word Liberal has been co-opted (like many words by the left - marriage, masculine, woman, health care, rights, Nazi, racist, etc.) by the "progressive" AKA regressive left. Classic liberalism is now called libertarian. Classic Liberal & former host at the Young Turks, Dave Rubin made a good video about it, "why I left the left" ruclips.net/video/hiVQ8vrGA_8/видео.html
Well done James, Peter, Helen, and Mike! You have given a precious gift to humanity and scholarship. It's up to us now to run with it.
Thank you so much for your courage, clarity and intelligence! The ideas being addressed are toxic to the fabric of society and are pushed by those who act as a new kind of bully motivated by ignorance and hate.
you three are brave and this is so important.
This is exactly what academia needs. Bright sound minds asking questions. Seeking answers.
Good on you, mate. It takes a lot of courage and integrity to do this. Much respect to you and your team
Fantastic work, well done!
Thank you for taking on this immense and risky challenge. I look forward to watch some more videos related to this.
you folks should get the Nobel Prize for saving education...that is, if this has any impact. I certainly hope it does.
Project Pete The worst thing about the experiment is how many people believe it was successful at all. They submitted 20 papers, made 50 resubmissions, and only got 4 papers published before being exposed. It’s not an effective critique of “grievance” studies since they could’ve made the experiment with equal outcome in any area of research without question. It’s also not an effective critique of ideological bias in “grievance” studies since they never even attempted publishing papers with different kinds of ideology. It’s not even an effective critique of science in general since getting a paper published is meaningless if it’s not even cited by anyone. According to the authors, their intent was literally to expose ideological bias in science and in the end... only their own bias is apparent. Let’s summarise: politically driven amateurs attack scientific journals, even though they didn’t have any scientific reasoning... and this is apparently heroic for reason X? Because it’s framed as revealing an ideological agenda? To clarify: in this video they allege they’ve uncovered an agenda where only politically fashionable papers are accepted... but they never even ATTEMPTED that! They never included politically unfashionable papers as controls. They also suggest their garbage research could influence universities or politicians, when in reality you can publish randomly generated nonsense if you really wish... however, nobody will cite or even read it! Passing pre-publication peer review is only the first stage of peer review and they were CAUGHT!
@@theespatier4456 ~ You're making too much sense here.
An absolute work of art. Well done
Joe Rogan brought me here....please keep up the good work. Iam watching this as my 5 yr old watches and Iam going to hope and pray for a better future for him
accidentally cought this when it was released, watched this like a million times. amazing work.
Thank you so much for this - a lesson for all of the western world. I love you guys.
- Ben, 28, Southern Germany.
thank you so much in doing this and taking it this serious. I hope you guys tip the scales in favor of dismantling what is happening over there.
This work of journalism is Pulitzer worthy. Great work!
This is very important work. Thank you so much!
This is epic! Way to go Pete, James and Helen!
Things like this are precisely why no one trusts the "experts" anymore. We know their ideas are insane because we live in the real world.
Love this! Keep doing what you’re doing! True HEROES!