I think the Sibelius family control over the original version expires in four years, 75 years from Sibelius’ death, and hope I live long enough enough to hear Kavakos play it again!
What a beautiful, majestic and poetic cadenza at the end, full of sorrow and joy! I'm not surprised that people call it the "Bach-like" cadenza. It's a great pity he didn't include it in the final version. Moreover, what a fantastic emotional narration by Kavakos!
I don't know the other version to be able to tell what the exact differences are, but sometimes it felt different... unfamiliar. Thanks for posting this!
Yes I would imagine it to be hard to distinguish the differences if you aren't super familiar with the concerto. Notably the most dramatic difference is the final cadenza starting at 15:11 which is full of chords and double stops.
Child prodigy Franz von Vescey played the revised version in 1905. This is the original version, which was technically too hard. Original version wasn't performed for 86 years, until it was revived with the allowance of the Sibelius heritage in the 1990's .
Hello! I just want to thank you for sharing this beautiful performance of this piece in its original version. Do you have the score or this 1903 version you can share with me for studying purposes? Thank you in advance 😊
![[最高音質] 'Air Cond' Beethoven Symphony Nr.9 'Choral' 1&4mov 1977](/img/1.gif)
I think the Sibelius family control over the original version expires in four years, 75 years from Sibelius’ death, and hope I live long enough enough to hear Kavakos play it again!
What a beautiful, majestic and poetic cadenza at the end, full of sorrow and joy! I'm not surprised that people call it the "Bach-like" cadenza. It's a great pity he didn't include it in the final version. Moreover, what a fantastic emotional narration by Kavakos!
The second cadenza was also very emotional for me personally. Really feels like a different piece compared to other recordings.
@@villesarkilahti4975 Agreed. It takes time to appreciate the emotional complexity of the original version. Thank you very much for the upload.
Incredibly impactful cadenza, perfectly transitioning into the movement’s finale. A shame it didn’t make it to the revised version.
Congratulations and many bravo for all your job mr.Kavakos!! Congratulations also to maestro and orchestra!!✨💐✨👏👏.
Simplemente maravilloso! 👏👏👏
Beutiful Cadenza!!!!!
I so much prefer this version to the final one!
I don't know the other version to be able to tell what the exact differences are, but sometimes it felt different... unfamiliar. Thanks for posting this!
Yes I would imagine it to be hard to distinguish the differences if you aren't super familiar with the concerto. Notably the most dramatic difference is the final cadenza starting at 15:11 which is full of chords and double stops.
The dialogue between soloist and orchestra is more coherent in the original as well.
Wonderful.
17:43
Its the development section!
This Concerto was played by a 13 years old child, Franz von Vecsey....
Child prodigy Franz von Vescey played the revised version in 1905. This is the original version, which was technically too hard. Original version wasn't performed for 86 years, until it was revived with the allowance of the Sibelius heritage in the 1990's .
Hello! I just want to thank you for sharing this beautiful performance of this piece in its original version. Do you have the score or this 1903 version you can share with me for studying purposes? Thank you in advance 😊
Is there a Maxim Vengerov recording of this piece? He talks about recording or planning to record one in a video.
He has rehearsed it with the Paris philharmonic, but I think that he doesn't have permission to publish a recording of the original version.
Yeah only Kavakos has permission to publish the original version... Sibelius's family gave him the permission only to him!
Where can I find the cadenza?
Every recording of the original concerto have been granted only with special permission of the Sibelius family.... So good luck!
hoccam bu nası bi cadenza