Very touching story. Im an SDA for over five years, most of what i learned is from you Pastor. But there is a serious problem I noticed in the sda . we are not teaching our core doctrines enough. The sanctuary message is very rarely tought . And is not even taken and regarded with the seriousness it ought to . I believe once you learn the sanctuary message in-depth it becomes evident that all other doctrine is error. You understand 1844 and truly believe it. Its a foundation that is unshakable. The work isn’t finish by us bringing the children to church. We have to diligently teach them the doctrines. Many in our church today don’t understand our doctrine and when tested strongly by other doctrines they will stray. I will join in prayer for them
Do you know which doctrine Ellen White mentioned alongside of the sanctuary doctrine as its equal in importance? That doctrine has now been entirely rejected, and a new, erroneous one, put in its place, one which was foreign to the Adventist pioneers. We have left our first love. The Bible instructs us regarding what we should do when we realize this.
@@christopherbarnes2510 "Those who seek to remove the old landmarks are not holding fast; they are not remembering how they have received and heard. Those who try to bring in theories that would remove *the pillars of our faith* concerning *the sanctuary,* or concerning *the personality of God or of Christ,* are working as blind men. They are seeking to bring in uncertainties and to set the people of God adrift, without an anchor." {20LtMs, Ms62, 1905, par. 14} This does touch on the three angels' message as well, because the first angel calls those in apostasy back to the worship of the true Creator God ("him" not "them"), and the second angel warns against drinking the wine of Babylon. Look up what Ellen White says the wine of Babylon is, and you will find just one major point missing--too far off track to be named. She would not use that word for God!
”This is an evil in all that is done under the sun: that one thing happens to all. Truly the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil; madness is in their hearts while they live, and after that they go to the dead. But for him who is joined to all the living there is hope, for a living dog is better than a dead lion. For the living know that they will die; But the dead know nothing, And they have no more reward, For the memory of them is forgotten. Also their love, their hatred, and their envy have now perished; Nevermore will they have a share In anything done under the sun.“ Ecclesiastes 9:3-6 NKJV
DAVID.......STEPHEN..... To complicated for a 13 year old girl. Today's youth often fall prey to emotional leadings as apposed to sound doctrine which is a form of hypnosis. LOVE is based upon true doctrine which is a principal = sound doctrine} Going after the influencer to this girl isn't going to help her in anyway, because there are long lines of these kind of folk in her community. The Catholic people are a wonderful people who simply have an incomplete Gospel. We don't know the mission the LORD has for her. Fast and Pray over this matter and lets not hide her in the SDA basement. I knew the value of our message because I've been a member of numerous protestant denominations before I was led here by the Holy Spirit. Those raised in the SDA church have no concept of the real value of this message and it becomes monotonous to them. An attempt to tie them to a pew will only result in there leaving for ever. Force and fear are attributes of the devil. Love your children and in this case ask the LORD what are his plans for this 13yr old. God Bless
Sorry but it is hard to see that Jesus is playing a roll. By saying that it was a roll. Your saying that Jesus was just roll playing and he is not the really the literal Son of God. And in that sense God is lying that he gave his only begotten Son to save us. God didn't really sacrifice his only Son. The Father didn't expensive real grief in losing a son. It is sad to think that there was no real sacrifice.
These explanations given are rather an embarrassing attempt to uphold the false trinity doctrine. EGW is clear “Satan in Heaven, before his rebellion, was a high and exalted angel, next in honor to God's dear Son.” 1SP 17.1 So it was not “third in command” it was next in honor. So all the explanations trying to split hairs over the word “command” are just human rhetoric. “We want the Holy Spirit, which is Jesus Christ." (Letter 66, April 10, 1894, par.17-18) The Holy Spirit is the omnipresence of Jesus by His divine nature - not a third person or being. This is why EGW could also say “The Father and the Son alone are to be exalted." (Ellen White, Youth Instructor, July 7, 1898 par. 2)
I agree that only the Father and the Son should be exalted. But that doesn’t mean the third person doesn’t exist. Nor does it mean they are not a separate entity from the other two. Isn’t the Spirit of God both the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Son. Then why should we be baptized in 3 different names? Shouldn’t we just exclude the 3rd individual as it would just be repetitive?
@@watsons4233 To clear up the confusion I advise you to look up “Daniel Mesa”. God has given him a ministry called “RevelationWithDaniel” you can find him on RUclips. He has studied about the angels (Biblically) more than anyone I know: so with a little searching you can find his lessons.
@@watsons4233 But Jesus said to share the gospel and baptise in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Why would we, mere man, drop the Spirit and only baptise in the Father and Son only?
Very touching story. Im an SDA for over five years, most of what i learned is from you Pastor. But there is a serious problem I noticed in the sda . we are not teaching our core doctrines enough. The sanctuary message is very rarely tought . And is not even taken and regarded with the seriousness it ought to . I believe once you learn the sanctuary message in-depth it becomes evident that all other doctrine is error. You understand 1844 and truly believe it. Its a foundation that is unshakable. The work isn’t finish by us bringing the children to church. We have to diligently teach them the doctrines. Many in our church today don’t understand our doctrine and when tested strongly by other doctrines they will stray. I will join in prayer for them
Do you know which doctrine Ellen White mentioned alongside of the sanctuary doctrine as its equal in importance? That doctrine has now been entirely rejected, and a new, erroneous one, put in its place, one which was foreign to the Adventist pioneers. We have left our first love. The Bible instructs us regarding what we should do when we realize this.
@@MongRay-n8i interesting. Which doctrine is it. I was thinking of the three angels message. And all three .
@@christopherbarnes2510 "Those who seek to remove the old landmarks are not holding fast; they are not remembering how they have received and heard. Those who try to bring in theories that would remove *the pillars of our faith* concerning *the sanctuary,* or concerning *the personality of God or of Christ,* are working as blind men. They are seeking to bring in uncertainties and to set the people of God adrift, without an anchor." {20LtMs, Ms62, 1905, par. 14}
This does touch on the three angels' message as well, because the first angel calls those in apostasy back to the worship of the true Creator God ("him" not "them"), and the second angel warns against drinking the wine of Babylon. Look up what Ellen White says the wine of Babylon is, and you will find just one major point missing--too far off track to be named. She would not use that word for God!
Dear God, please rescue this precious family in Jesus name amen
Amen 🙏🏼 💞
Amen!❤
Thank you! This was very informative and helpful!
💞 👍 Keep up the good work❣️
Thirteen is a tough age to reason with a child. The daughter needs much love and prayer for sure. May the Lord lead this young lady to the Truth.
”This is an evil in all that is done under the sun: that one thing happens to all. Truly the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil; madness is in their hearts while they live, and after that they go to the dead. But for him who is joined to all the living there is hope, for a living dog is better than a dead lion. For the living know that they will die; But the dead know nothing, And they have no more reward, For the memory of them is forgotten. Also their love, their hatred, and their envy have now perished; Nevermore will they have a share In anything done under the sun.“
Ecclesiastes 9:3-6 NKJV
DAVID.......STEPHEN..... To complicated for a 13 year old girl.
Today's youth often fall prey to emotional leadings as apposed
to sound doctrine which is a form of hypnosis. LOVE is based upon
true doctrine which is a principal = sound doctrine} Going after the
influencer to this girl isn't going to help her in anyway, because there
are long lines of these kind of folk in her community. The Catholic
people are a wonderful people who simply have an incomplete Gospel.
We don't know the mission the LORD has for her. Fast and Pray over
this matter and lets not hide her in the SDA basement.
I knew the value of our message because I've been a member of
numerous protestant denominations before I was led here by the Holy Spirit.
Those raised in the SDA church have no concept of the real value
of this message and it becomes monotonous to them. An attempt to
tie them to a pew will only result in there leaving for ever.
Force and fear are attributes of the devil. Love your children and in this
case ask the LORD what are his plans for this 13yr old.
God Bless
Well said❣️😀
Glory to Jesus for these words of wisdom.
Sorry but it is hard to see that Jesus is playing a roll. By saying that it was a roll. Your saying that Jesus was just roll playing and he is not the really the literal Son of God. And in that sense God is lying that he gave his only begotten Son to save us. God didn't really sacrifice his only Son. The Father didn't expensive real grief in losing a son. It is sad to think that there was no real sacrifice.
These explanations given are rather an embarrassing attempt to uphold the false trinity doctrine. EGW is clear “Satan in Heaven, before his rebellion, was a high and exalted angel, next in honor to God's dear Son.” 1SP 17.1 So it was not “third in command” it was next in honor. So all the explanations trying to split hairs over the word “command” are just human rhetoric. “We want the Holy Spirit, which is Jesus Christ." (Letter 66, April 10, 1894, par.17-18) The Holy Spirit is the omnipresence of Jesus by His divine nature - not a third person or being. This is why EGW could also say “The Father and the Son alone are to be exalted." (Ellen White, Youth Instructor, July 7, 1898 par. 2)
Amen, the Trinity was not endorced by the SDA early Pioneers for good reason, it is not Biblical but rather dates back to Babylon.
I agree that only the Father and the Son should be exalted. But that doesn’t mean the third person doesn’t exist. Nor does it mean they are not a separate entity from the other two. Isn’t the Spirit of God both the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Son. Then why should we be baptized in 3 different names? Shouldn’t we just exclude the 3rd individual as it would just be repetitive?
@@watsons4233
To clear up the confusion I advise you to look up “Daniel Mesa”. God has given him a ministry called “RevelationWithDaniel” you can find him on RUclips. He has studied about the angels (Biblically) more than anyone I know: so with a little searching you can find his lessons.
@@watsons4233 But Jesus said to share the gospel and baptise in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Why would we, mere man, drop the Spirit and only baptise in the Father and Son only?
The confusion comes from Ellen White's contradictory statements. Bible is clear about three persons but not three gods