Armitron Griffy Stainless/Red LED Watch- Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @michaelturner4457
    @michaelturner4457 Месяц назад

    The Hamilton actually a reproduction Pulsar P2 "The Time Computer". And it was a Pulsar P2 that featured in Live And Let Die. They had to brand the reproduction as Hamilton though, not Pulsar, because the Hamilton Watch Co sold the Pulsar brand to Seiko in about 1977, when the original HWC went bust. In HWC's original '70s marketing for their LED watches it was always the Pulsar brand. And in the credits for Live And Let Die it states "Pulsar, The Time Computer", underneath "Rolex, Inc."

  • @larryfromwisconsin9970
    @larryfromwisconsin9970 Месяц назад

    I remember 1973 watching James Bond in the theater. I was impressed with the LED watch. At that time that Hamilton Pulsar watch cost more than a Rolex Submariner. In 1971 my buddy bought a new in the box Submariner in Switzerland for $165 USD. I bought a new in the box Omega Seamaster 120 on the beads of rice bracelet for $67 USD. I like this LED watch especially with the red LED. And I have Polywatch to remove any scratches on the acrylic crystal. Sapphire and a screw down case back would be nice but you're not getting that for $35. Thanks for your review. BTW I think that Casio is ugly.

  • @R.C.Bullar
    @R.C.Bullar 15 дней назад

    Great video!
    It is a 16mm lug though.

  • @RickyD1968
    @RickyD1968 Месяц назад +3

    Very cool retro watch love the red led !!!!!!!

    • @nobetagear
      @nobetagear  Месяц назад

      Agreed, my favorite combo with the stainless finish. Thanks for watching!

  • @R.C.Bullar
    @R.C.Bullar 15 дней назад

    Everyone complains about the bracelet but it’s actually quite good for the price.
    I seen one where the guy compared the bracelet to a Tudor🤣🤣🤣 I’m like no way the Tudor bracelet is better?!?? Lol

  • @bigfootsburneraccount9160
    @bigfootsburneraccount9160 22 дня назад

    I believe it actually has mineral glass, mine has no scratches and if it were acrylic like many of my others it would be scratched up after the amount ive worn and bumped it, so i believe its at least mineral crystal

  • @WatchWiseUS
    @WatchWiseUS Месяц назад

    I have this watch and I bought it specifically because of Moonraker :) I agree the digits are too large but for the price you can't beat it.

    • @michaelturner4457
      @michaelturner4457 Месяц назад

      To do the Moonraker look properly you really need to be sporting a Seiko M354-5019, along with appropriate safari suit and hovercraft gondola.

    • @WatchWiseUS
      @WatchWiseUS Месяц назад

      @@michaelturner4457 On it!

  • @patzguitarz
    @patzguitarz Месяц назад +1

    I remember the OG Pulsar back in the 70s. They were very expensive. In the early 80s, Casio and Seiko came out with much less expensive LCDs that showed the time without having to push the button. The pretty much killed off the LED watch. It's good to see LED options back for watch lovers.

    • @nobetagear
      @nobetagear  Месяц назад

      Thanks for the input and for tuning in!

  • @cliffordrandell735
    @cliffordrandell735 6 дней назад

    I read a review that said it was junk and fell apart right out of the box. I hope not I want one for my son

  • @kmusicmagazine
    @kmusicmagazine Месяц назад

    The digits are too big. Should have been the 1970s calculator LED style instead to really be retro.

    • @nobetagear
      @nobetagear  Месяц назад

      Good point, thanks for watching!