For 5G Implementation, Design & Optimization, check out the complete playlist below :) 🌐5G Workshop Lectures - The Practical Approach to 5G Learning 💡ruclips.net/p/PL4OXTttOk9WitKYbI_YRbMM5nneh2wpfk
Thanks for the wonderful explanation. I got a question. How is the spectral efficiency affected by the variable numerology in 5G. As within the single sub frame, we will have more guard periods because of more number of switiching between UL and DL Resource blocks.
Sorry i have a basic question- Understand the latency reduces if we increase the SCS, then why do most of the operators use 30Khz spacing and not 120 or 240Khz spacing which would result in lower latency? Ofcourse the number of RBs would reduce with 240Khz spacing, but does that impact the cell capacity as the no. of REs in a subframe would still remain the same? Also would like to know where is the use of 240Khz spacing beneficial? Sorry if this sounds too basic. Thanks again!
For 5G Implementation, Design & Optimization, check out the complete playlist below :)
🌐5G Workshop Lectures - The Practical Approach to 5G Learning
💡ruclips.net/p/PL4OXTttOk9WitKYbI_YRbMM5nneh2wpfk
I have a telecom interview in 5 days, and your videos are really helpful at end moment!
Best of luck!
Thanks for the wonderful explanation. I got a question. How is the spectral efficiency affected by the variable numerology in 5G. As within the single sub frame, we will have more guard periods because of more number of switiching between UL and DL Resource blocks.
Yes, but the GP will also be smaller as the symbol duration is smaller.
@@OurTechPlanet Alright, that makes sense. Thanks again
Fantastic explanation in simplest possible way :) Please keep spreading the knowledge.
Thanks for the kind words :)
Very nice logical explanation thanknyou sir ❤🎉
Thanks, you made my day :)
You have a new subscriber, keep up the great work.
That is great, Dirk :)
Sorry i have a basic question- Understand the latency reduces if we increase the SCS, then why do most of the operators use 30Khz spacing and not 120 or 240Khz spacing which would result in lower latency? Ofcourse the number of RBs would reduce with 240Khz spacing, but does that impact the cell capacity as the no. of REs in a subframe would still remain the same? Also would like to know where is the use of 240Khz spacing beneficial? Sorry if this sounds too basic. Thanks again!
At higher frequencies we have higher doppler shift so we use bigger subcarrier spacing to mitigate the impact.
This video is really amazing...thanks alot
Most welcome 😊
Fantastic explanation in easiest possible way
Thanks a lot
So, more the Subcarrier Spacing, lower will be the Latency, please confirm if this statement is True or False?
In a way, you are correct. More the SCS, shorter the symbol length and thus quicker the network can be.