Running Skyrim With The "Recommended System Requirements" 9 Years Later..
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Skyrim is a timeless classic. The original 2011 release is even better as far as performance on PC goes, thanks to it's DX9 support and compatibility with older hardware. Today we're taking a look back at Bethesda's suggested system requirements for the game and seeing how well it runs in 2020.
Hand made RGinHD hat here: www.etsy.com/u...
Thanks for watching :)
Other RUclipsrs: "Watch me play Cyberpunk 2077 at 4k with my RTX 3080!"
RGinHD: "Watch me play a 9 year old game on period appropriate hardware!"
I'm using a FX 4100 even today lmoa. Kill me please.
@@robingeilhuber6081 Bro, U OK?
@ddk I've got a 1050Ti, so older Games run fine and i can get newer stuff like Sims 4 or Crusader Kings 3 to run okayish. I bought a 8350 too, but the pc will freeze on the homescreen if i use it. fml
@@robingeilhuber6081 Have you tried the FX 6300? It's not great but it's better than the 4100.
@@JohnSmith-nj9qo No i have not. I think the problem is that the 8350 needs 125W and my mainboard supports max. 95 TDP, so i think i'll try a FX 8300 next.
What a coincidence, I just started a heavily modded skyrim playthrough for the millionth time!
Same here! :D
me to, that say enough about current state of PC gaming :D
Me toooo!
Same (without mods) lmao
@@realbento Try Requiem.
I suppose we will begin to see a lot of "Skyrim: 10 years later" videos popping up in 2021.
hell yeah
Lets hope so, because there were no "Q6600: 10 years later" videos
Skyrim was such a good game
Hopefully
Hyped about it in fact xD
What I find fascinating is how your able to play at that fov without seeing any visual glitches like arm clipping
when you type in the fov there are two different settings. "fov (worldfov) (viewmodelfov)" so like "fov 110 75" will not cause the arm clipping and you get the increased vision :)
@@AxolotlBaiken All of these mods don't do that XD damn rip
Oh Ye Younglings ;-D
*You're
Skyrim actually adjusts everything properly by default. Which makes it quite baffling that they didn't include a FOV slider, since the command for it is implemented properly.
The 3070 and 10400 are falling asleep playing it capped at 75fps
Possible 8k experience?
@@NonOfYourRizznessSir 16k 30fps?
then play in 4k with heavy mods to wake them up
@@justghostie4948 bru 16k is not even a thing yet, maybe 12k but only mod is 4k for skyrim
@@NonOfYourRizznessSir it is technically a thing, take 16 4k monitors and there you go, 16k. LTT did it
I played this on my Pentium 4c 2.4GHz, 512MB DDR2, and a 7600GS. Wasn't the greatest experience but still semi playable lol.
Yeah it's amazing what Skyrim can run on with low enough settings
@@rodrigofilho1996 maybe he meant it
@@rodrigofilho1996 maybe he meant it
OG or SE version?
@@rodrigofilho1996 lol, I read mb
man i remember modding the shit out of skyrim back in 2013 with my FX6200 and GTX760
the good old days
This is my favorite game, I love Skyrim
Bruh, you've got a very calming voice. Been feeling stressed and this video helped me out.
This channel and OzTalksHardware are both good for that.
Gayyyyyyy.
Lol nah I'm just kidding. I actually agree. This is the perfect channel to just smoke a blunt and drink some hot chocolate to lol. Chilling by the fireplace and shit
Also, I just realized I don't have a fireplace. My god, what have I done
Try Gregg Braden he's wholesum asf
@@HazyJ28 oh hell yeah i def agree
That's (and his jokes) why I like Mitten Squad so much. Gaming channel not a tech channel, but great content to pass the time.
Damn I remember the first time I ran Skyrim was at ultra low settings and resolution on an Intel gma 4500m and still enjoyed it, came a long way from that now that my current pc doesn’t even have to spin the gpu fans to run this game at max settings
I remember on my old laptop I couldn't even run CSGO at 1280x720 low-medium settings to get past 40fps in most maps, so I had to play in 800x600 and run everything at lowest to get barely 50fps.
I love these kinds of videos, and it's always a pleasure to see Skyrim content. Have you ever thought of doing Oblivion or even Morrowind with their recommended system requirements? Would be pretty cool I think
Even to this day I play skyrim.. the mod community keeps it alive!
I’m playing Skyrim until Skyblivion drops.
Skyrim is hands down the most modding friendly game by far, not to mention the modding community is fucking awesome.
Even on its own without mods, so much fun to play and so interesting to travel and do different things with different characters
I've only just started playing SE this evening. Talk about timing 😳
Stay sharp.
So... You're finally awake
I ran OG Skyrim on Athlon X2 6000+ with HD 5870 in 1440p. The biggest limitation in my experience was 1 GB of VRAM (for 1440p anyway). 2GB of system memory was just enough too.
I think people keep forgetting that windows utilizes whatever ram you put in your system because it's there and not necessarily because of what it needs. Hence when you had 4GB, Everything was still running smooth and probably was using 3 point something... And when you put in 8 it was showing to be using 6.
Been playing it on my Switch Lite for months. It's the only game I've purchased and downloaded since I bought the handheld way back in Janurary. It looks and plays great which isn't surprising as it's a 10 year old game that the NVIDIA custom Tegra processor can handle very comfortably. It can be buggy at times though.
"You can install a mod"
200+ mods later it doesn't look like skyrim anymore
You can do a few modifications to the config files to play with normal physics at higher framerates. Worked fine for me
Skyrim special edition has a mod to fix it permanently
@@lolcat Not worth it, Skyrim 2011's version is still the best option, it's hiden in Steam but you can still buy it, you need the direct Steam link to the game page (just go to the Special edition game page's comments, link will be there).
Bethesda asked for it so people buy the Special edition instead, but there's a lot of people who can't handle that version. There's where 2011 version is the best one, with a minimum required of 2GB ram and only 4GB ram for the best experience.
@@cristopheraguilar9742
I prefer the special edition solely for the 64 bit compared to 32 bit for modding
My first and only foray into the modding scene for oldrim involved me going over that limit and just not being able to play at all.
As my favourite thing in gaming is modding into the ground the more I can do the happier I am.
I can hardly believe it's been almost 10 years, feels like it was yesterday when the game came out. I still remember it being used as a benchmark.
The OG release is 32-bit, the new one is 64-bit.
This alone makes the OG release useless to anyone with a 64-bit / DX11 system. It is a *massive* upgrade for Skyrim.
The old 32-bit release still runs perfectly fine on modern systems. It's rather that the SE would be able to use more resources when available.
I actually play the normal version normally because of the broader range of mod support. Not everything got ported over.
@@HappyBeezerStudios The 64-bit version runs better on modern hardware and can be modded more before becoming unstable.
@@CharcharoExplorer but saying that its "useless" is a really big stretch, I'm still playing oldrim with modern hardware and it runs well with 150+ mods
@@theysaidimasian9766 It would run better on the 64-bit version. IMHO, 32-bit apps should have stopped coming out in 2005. It limits the games.
Ran this on an old Acer Aspire v5. was on an AMD apu with only 512 mb of vram. It ran rather well for what it was.
I played on a Lenovo with a mobile i5 and HD 4000 graphics. Had to go into the config files and do tweaks like turning off ALL the grass to get a good framerate.
Had an old Dell Inspiron in 2011. Even though I had a PS3 I simply chose to play the game on my laptop instead and even though it could only really run at 720p low settings, it was still a great experience. Ever since that year, I've made it a ritual to start a Skyrim save once every year, even if I don't always finish it. Yesterday I started up the SE version with some mods.
@@aninfinitemindofmusicandreams i ran it back in 2011 with an hp laptop, i5 and dedicated amd card with 512mb. Ran well
I played on mobile Intel HD 2000 i3 and enjoyed it very much
@@MyNameIsBucket what is turning of all the grass
Didn’t know if it was possible to catch a RGinHD video as it goes live
I've played Skyrim on a C2D E6600, with 2, or 4 gigs, can't remember and an MSI 260 GTX (still have the rig but it has 4 gigs now). I put 178 hours in it for the first run and loved every minute. Great vid as always!
In 2045 they are still releasing ultra Max out remastered version of skyrim
2061 50th anniversary edition 😂
@RandomGaminginHD Bethesda will actually do that if they are still around in 2061.
@@RandomGaminginHD they will definitely do that if Bethesda do exist then
Skyrim remains the best most satisfying game of all time
Especially because you can literally do everything in it, very satisfying for completionists
Cant wait to revisit cyberpunk 2077 9 years later
Buggiest graphical marvel
For those that don't know, you can play Special Edition with a FPS patch. I don't remember who made it but it's on Nexus and there are different patches for different frame rates
To play in +60FPS you need to tweak the Havok files, I think it was called physics timings or something like that.
Can you do a Half Life 2 recommended system requirements pc. Feel like that is a good idea :D
It isn't good, it's a great idea! 😃
Besides the requirements being rather vague, it also depends on where you look.
1.7 GHz CPU, 512 MB RAM, a DX8.1 capable graphics with support for shader 2.0 is what seam says.
Some info from back then say recommended are a 2.4 GHz CPU and a DX9 card as recommended.
And it was wild with DX9, besides basic DX9, there were also DX9.0a and DX9.0b which only ran on ATI or nVidia respectively, before "united" in DX9.0c, some older cards like the FX series could technically do DX9, but were awfully slow, so some games, HL2 included, defaulted to run in DX8 on it. Oh, and neither 1.7 nor 2.4 GHz say anything about what they scale on. Depending on the game a Pentium 4 with 2.4 GHz was either slower than a 1.6 GHz Athlon or faster than a 2.2 GHz Athlon. So which CPU to test?
Actually found some old review where it took a Athlon 1800+ and a Geforce 4 Ti 4200 to be "not stuttery" (with no mention on actual framerate) in 1024x768. and in another one either a FX 5900 Ultra or Radeon 9600 Pro to go over 35 fps.
@@HappyBeezerStudios valve moment
@@HappyBeezerStudios literally any laptop that isn't a crappy netbook or Chromebook can run Half Life 2 at HD high settings and get over 60fps (yes that even includes MacBooks).
@Massimo De Grazia I am aware of that lol
"Glitch free experience in Skyrim" doesn't exist
I played this first one an Xbox 360 and then later on an fx 4300 and R7 250 2GB DDR3. Worked fine and was a lot of fun at the time.
Better hardware just means I get to play around with more mods lol
I remember when the GTX 560 released, and everyone recommended it for skyrim.
Good times!
Stuff like this and you trying out older video cards is just so cool
All those arrows and I didn't see a single one hit a knee. Sad times ...
I love this channel because it's quite sobering, watching Linus or Jay, components stop having meaning after the 100th pc with 3090's in them, coming to this channel really helps for perspective on how far computers have came.
I played Skyrim originally on an A6 3620 APU - managed to squeeze out a pretty solid 50 FPS experience with Textures on High by sacrificing in every other category as well as utilizing MANY .ini tweaks to murder dynamic shadows. It may not have looked the best but hey it worked. I later upgraded to an R9 280 in 2013 and was off to the races (even enabled some ENBs after that)
I love this old hardware review. Good to see that Skyrim runs well on it's recommended specs well. And that poor guard at 6:24 lol
There's a bit of misinformation here:
1. Going above 60 fps is possible without any bugs. Look into the fMaxTime ini tweak. This changes how much fps the game is tied to.
2. For most midrange pcs that support it, Special Edition is superior to the original in terms of performance when you go into the ini and disable many of the effects which make SE better visually (Volumetrics, for example). It is also far better optimized on the CPU side of things, eg looking down from dragonsreach no longer tanks your fps unlike the original.
3. Special Edition is well known to be much more stable when modded. Far fewer crashes and bugs.
Just do not forget, that in 2011 not all players were using 1080p and most of recommended settings were for 900p, 1080p became a standard in late 2012 for PC when new technology makes them cheaper (yes, there were ppl, who used even 2k, but this was not a standard for 2011 and 2k was like 8k today). Even by Nvidia recommended Maximal resolution for GTX 260 was 1600x900 and best and most common was 1366x768, so FPS will be higher if we will lover resolution to 2011 standards recommended by Nvidia themself.
Also do not know why, but not just me have the same problem, but vanila Skyrim on Windows 10 Pro for me shows 40-50FPS without mods, but on XP it shows 60FPS (GTX1060).
Hahahahaha what a coincidence. I'm watching your video while skyrim is loading right now with my laptop with a i5-5200u and gt920m loaded with 120 mods
When this first came out, my build was an Athlon 64 x2 5400+ and a 9800GTX 1GB
Wow, I was rockin an Athlon 64 x2 5600+ and a 9600GT 1GB. Had 4GB DDR2 800. Did not play this game well. It rocked at Oblivion but not Skyrim. Skyrim is what forced my upgrade. Phenom II x4 965, 16GB DDR3 1600 Kingston Hyper X Genesis, HD 6870 that never worked and was RMAd for a HD 7850 2GB. Skyrim (And GTA V to an extent) also forced my next upgrade as SE came out and ran like a slob on it. God Rays dropped me to 30fps. So, FX 8350, same mem, 240 GB PNY SSD, RX 480 8gb and it was all gravy till I went back to Intel. That's when I realized Skyrim was made to run on an Intel CPU with Nvidia GPU and no matter how much AMD I threw at it from that era I would never get the same performance. Not until Ryzen a little while later. Thank you for that trip down memory lane!
congrats your first PC is stronger than the Nintendo Switch
It is crazy really, even modern notebooks (around 500 euros) can run this game now fairly well. I managed to get solid 30-40 fps on the skyrim special edition on low setting.
You're a monster. RIP Whiterun
Do you plan on taking a look at the EZ Optimizer tool for Cyberpunk 2077? I think it would be interesting to see how it affects the performance of the various hardware you've already tested. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on its effectiveness.
I have a cheapo build and was able to come back to this game this year, and was so excited to run it absolutely cranked with heavy mods.
Even if my hardware is old AF by today’s standards.
HP 8300
i7-3770
16 GB RAM
AMD RX 590
SSD
So it handles the SE well. This video checked the RUclips recommended for me because A. Computer hardware videos and B. Skyrim
Thats still considered decent hardware. Not ancient or bad at any standard. If it can play almost every game at 1080p it's still good
I am playing "Vanilla" Skyrim on my 8 (or 7?) year old i5-2500K (non-overclocked) with 2 x 2 GB DDR3-1333 RAM and an ASUS RadeonHD 6870, in Windows 10 Home (1909/18363.1139), and it runs just fine (knock on wood).
I was/am also playing the same "Vanilla" Skyrim on my Ryzen 5-1600 (non-overclocked) with 2 x 4 GB DDR4-2666 RAM. First with a 1050Ti and then a 1650 Super.
I had this faint "micro stuttering", which did not seem to change much by playing with the settings.
I upgraded to a R7 3700X (non-overclocked; I don't do such things) , 2 x 8 GB DDR4-3200 RAM and an ASUS 2060Super, and said "stuttering" is gone.
Admittedly, the i5 is being used together with an old 1600x900 HP monitor, while the Ryzen 7 uses a 1920x1080 display, that works at 60 Hz instead of 144 Hz, due to the flying horses and stuff.
- What does old hardware do better than newer hardware?
- How does code influence the in-game experience, I am wondering.
A lot of the big issues have been patched out over time on the original Skyrim, this is way smoother than launch quality
@@mikeycrackson it's not a bug, it's a *Feature*
''i've seen floating cows, food on tables flying all over the room at the slightest touch''
On 7th gen consoles it was really bad. 640p internal upscaled to 720p on the XBox 360 and 600p internal upscaled to 720p on the PS3 with what seems to be the medium preset on PC more or less. Also, while performance on XBox 360 was mostly steady 30fps throughout, performance on the PS3 dropped to the low 20s when there were particle effects and action on screen, but even just peacefully walking around it would rarely hit the 30fps mark. PS3 players truly got the other end of the stick with that one.
The ps3 version was by far the worst
The Inigo follower mod was the one that made me get addicted to Skyrim again after some years of successful but now ruined abstinence. But totally worth it: Inigo makes the game feels truly alive
I remember running Skyrim just fine on 4th gen i5 integrated graphics.
Dude I love your channel 👍
Nomatter how much money I spend/waste on my PC some smug t**t on youtube is making it look "so last Wednesday".
I love the retro gaming scene because it demonstrates that everything is not crap the instant nvidia holds out its hand for more money!
I hope you had a merry xmas and I hope you have a fantastic new year 😁
Here's to more quality content in 2021 🥂
2:14 Actually the 60fps limit isnt really bug, since its cause by the physics engine not being made to handle 60+fps, thus not bug, more of unintented "feature"
Skyrim LE is really hard to benchmark due to the game engine limitation with the cpu usage. More often than not, it is noticeable in some areas like Solitude and Riften. Whenever you face a certain direction you will get framedrops. But not because the gpu can't handle it.
5:57 and 6:08 are good examples.
Look at the cpu/gpu usage and the fps. Game engine is choking the hardware harder than Hermaeus Mora's tentacles.
I played Skyrim on a Pentium 4 3GHz, and a Radeon 9800pro.
Oh I had the same card. ) With pentium 4 2.4 gHz. But it was at times when oblivion was new.
I understand you can only use what you have on hand per say, but, i feel like in 2011 a Phenom/Phenom II would be the more appropriate Quad core hardware. As we all know, that 4100 was really performing dual core, where as the Phenom II and Athlon II x4 chips were true quad cores.
As far as objects getting thrown are super fast, I've literally been killed by random flying crap hitting me. I guess a cabbage going warp 8 would be pretty deadly..
Skyrim: 4K edition with 77 active mods, 1440p I can play and stream to my tv to couch play. It’s my favourite game of all time
To fix the 60 FPS physics glitches, you can add this to Skryim.ini:
[HAVOK]
fMaxTime=0.0166
----------------------
The formula is as follows: 0.0166 = 1.0 / 60 FPS
Change that value to suit your desired framerate.
I'm going to try in a couple of days with a system like this (I'm waiting to get the goods from a friend that has them lying unused in a box): a Core 2 Duo E8500, 4GB of DDR2 RAM, a GeForce 8800GTS and a 240GB SSD (a small concession to modernity). The Legendary edition should work fine, or at least I hope so.
Anyone else mistake the computer in the thumbnail for some super cool modded laser rifle?
Anyone who wants a new experience in skyrim try open cities, its a bit intense on the system but it removes the loading screens for cities so they feel more immersive to walk in too
Looking back I wish Skyrim had come out on PC only in 2011 and taken full advantage of PC hardware. The game was made on the xbox 360 and then ported to the PC and PS3. Dark times indeed. Maybe Skyrim could have looked as good as Crysis a PC exclusive from 2007
I remember when I first got the game back in 2011. Tried running it on the HD3850 we had in our PC back in the day. FPS was doable. The thing that made it unplayable was the lack of available memory. The textures for the dragons we were so excited for didn't get loaded in, leading to my character constantly getting killed by an invisible fire breathing entity XD. Looking back, the problem wasn;t the graphics card though, it was the system RAM. The PC had 4 GB's. While theoretically enough, it was also my dad's work PC so there were a lot of things running in the background including sometimes my dad logging into another account in the background. XD
When Skyrim came out, I played it on the family Windows Vista laptop. I could have got it on PS3, but I wanted mod support. I have no idea what the spec was besides running Vista, but between the poor performance and the fact that sometimes locations wouldn't even load properly, I don't think it met the minimum requirements.
Never turn down AF, people. It can be set to the max (8 or 16) without any framerate penalty. It helps textures look much sharper and more detailed for free
As someone who actually games on a 260 its great to see it in some modern videos not 10 year old vids all through i have an inno3d gtx 260 it's still 896mb
I was waiting for this!
Yeah, I still love this game...pretty much for the reasons that RGiHD gave.
It’s my therapy game.
Where is the 1680x1050 resolution!!!! I rocked that from 2006 to 2014!!!
Same. Jumped to 1080p in 2014 then 1440p 120Hz in 2015. Now i'm 4K 60 hz. Looking at a 4K 120 Hz next month.
Got 1680x1050 on my 3rd screen atm. Even today it's big enough to carry some info.
Sadly I still miss my pre-1080p-tft days, when my old 53 lbs CRT could run 2048x1536
@@HappyBeezerStudios Yeah I had a Gateway and an Acer that did 1440p, both 23" which was huge for the time. Back in the good ol lagless days...
The monitors in my school's computer labs still have that resolution lmao
I’m young enough that gaming wasn’t really on my radar when this game was popular, now I’m really considering buying it
Get it quick while the winter sale is going on.
Bruh this game runs on my dad's old dinosaur pc with specs way below the MINIMUM. Everything is on the low settings and the resolution is slightly lowered, but it runs smoothly!
Skyrim is probably the only game i can come back to and grind it for weeks and i love it!
i always wanted to make a "period correct" computer to play older games, but i was gonna base it on New Vegas as the top benchmark in the hardware specs
I used to play back in the day Skyrim on a laptop (GT 220M, Pentium Dual Core T4400 2.20GHz, 4GB RAM). It was running really well on 768p, 40-60fps on medium
Seeing Skyrim again makes me wish I still had my ps3 save. It was my first and I stopped selling gems and items after I learned that potions were extremely valuable. I made a giant horde in my house at Whiterun. Gems, legendary items, golden ingots, basically anything that was shiny and rare got put into a giant pile. If I ran through it my game would lag and sometimes to fix it I had to restart my console. It was great. My next playthrough on PC I'm going to do the same thing and see how much stuff I can pile up before my 1080ti and r7 2700x burst into flame.
i remember playing it on a PC with 1.5gb DDR400 ram, single core 1.6ghz AMD Sempron and a Sapphire HD3650 AGP. it was running between 25 and 30fps, which was pretty impressive considering the age of the hardware i was running it on.
Skyrim might be the game that really got me into PC gaming. I played it for the first time on a laptop with an intel HD 4000.
if you are running it on windows 10 it will perform worse with the older hardware since 4 gb of ram is barely enough for win10
mmm I think you should have also used Windows XP or 7 as well. For science of course. I also remember that 1680*1050 was an extremely popular resolution for the day on widescreen AND many many users were still on older 1280*1024 displays.
I ran legendary edition at about 200fps because i didnt know that it should limited and disabling vsync is a habit. I realized something was wrong about the time i entered a room only to be KO'd by a book.
This channel really is super cool
I still play this on my older gaming PC with a Core 2 Quad Q9550, 4 gb ddr2 ram running at 960 mhz, and a GTX 570 graphics card. It runs Skyrim at almost a constant 60 fps with high settings and 1680 by 1050.
Glad you could squeeze another video in the year! If I could ask a question, would you recommend Azza power supplies?
I remember playing this on a Core 2 Duo E4600 and HD4670. It runs pretty well considering it was on 1366x768 resolution.
I really want to buy a hat but after shipping it comes to $40 CAD which is a bit too much for me. I may still purchase one later, just wanted to say they look awesome!
Will there be another version of this video for Cyberpunk 2077 in 9 years?
It might be finished by then.
I remember running modded Skyrim LE (around 90 mods) on a laptop with an Intel HD 3000, 8GB RAM, and an i5 2450M. It ran surprisingly well, given the hardware I had at the time. Not sure of the actual FPS, but the game was playable.
Creation engine's framerate tied physics system always baffled me considering that a book I read on unity covered how to avoid this very thing within the first chapter. I understand, two different engines, but the fact they consider it to be such a trivial thing to do as to teach how to NOT do it so early really just blew me away. Bethesda going to Bethesda I guess.
I play this game on a GT 210 with nearly 100 mods. Rest of the specs:
Core 2 Duo E7300
4GB DDR2 RAM.
7200 RPM HDD.
This game can definitely run on variety of hardware.
Hey what system monitoring software are you using there?
Good video btw, was nice to see the old game again
I’m wondering if Bethesda will be remastering Skyrim again to give the game native ray-tracing support when making it available on the new consoles🤔
Aw man, this makes me want to whip out the xbox 360 and load up one of my save files.
Skyrim is such a classic for gamers on older hardware. There’s still loads of people playing it even today.
I always though Oblivion was way better though. Maybe it’s just the nostalgia factor.
The game that i cannot uninstall on my PC... I always come back once in a while
I hate how Bethesda delisted the original version of Skyrim. Sure, people were kind enough to save links to the original Steam pages plus DLCs, and you can still find keys for it on certain sites, but thats still nonsense
Not sure if you had the same experience, but I found the Special Edition of Skyrim to be much buggier than the original. I had better luck just installing high definition texture packs in the original version. I also couldn't play an archer build on the PS4 version of Skyrim Special Edition because my arrows would pass through enemies like they weren't there.
it's just my favorite game of all times, i got back to it last month and I've been playing since them
Hey RGINHD, i'd consider upping the bitrate of your capture device. It gets really blocky and looks more like 720p than 1080p.
Yeah I think it might be this specific device. Plus I always find that Skyrim footage comes out quite pixelated too no matter the capture device
You videos are awesome keep up the good work!!!