All videos seen at this current time have been shot and/or edited prior to any guidance around isolation and social distancing. We will be ensuring presenters follow social distancing guidelines along with following the daily updates issued. Stay Safe. Team Andertons. 🤘❤️
I understand Team Andertons have to CYA but have we become as a society so sensitive, petty and bored to report a video showing 2 humans less than 6 feet away from each other? Too bad all this and it wasn’t even Ebola or something that will kill healthy people under 80, make a 20yr old healthy athlete bleed from their eyes within 2 days of acquiring the virus. Great Video!
My mums dog is sitting on my knee. When you hit the chord in tune, nothing. When the temp was dropped and you hit it out of tune she jumped up, turned round and stared into my soul hahaha! 😂
Speakers in a synth is actually a very cool feature I wish more manufactures would implement. In fact, one of the things severely lacking in almost all piano action keyboards is the vibration feedback aspect of an acoustic instrument. Sit behind even the cheapest barely in tune piano, and the feel is so direct. Not just string overtones, but the vibration of the harp and wood is connective physical feedback. A light touch gives you an ever so slight buzz to your finger tips, and play a heavy chord like the end of A Day In The Life and you feel a real visceral vibration up your arms and even through your entire body. You don't even need speakers, just put some type of iPhone type vibration feedback mechanism into a keyboard. Hammond tone wheels even buzz and hum and you can feel them when you play them. This is a step in the right direction Roland!
That is a very interesting point! Feedback feel would never cross my mind. Andy also gave a pretty good reason why they've included speakers. With those two, it is truly a step in the right direction, I agree. If you don't like them, you can always turn them off.
Dennis Ristow Thank you!!! The vibrations are a huge part of what makes an instrument an instrument. I've thought about that taptic feedback method as well as a way of getting the feeling without the crappy sound that sometimes comes with internal speakers.
As someone just found out on the gearslutz site , the abm models in the jupiter x and xm is essentially the basic zen-core engine with scaled parameters (dependent on the chosen synth model ) and a hidden input gain for the filters . So if roland really wanted ,they could just add the vintage models to the mc707 and the fantom .
@@xp50player Those are NOT acb models Check the difference between ACB and ABM Roland just confuses people , no wonder the majority thinks ABM is the same as ACB , but it's not ACB is far superior
After Roland pulled the iPad Editor for the Jupiter 80 (which made editing of the complex innards much easier), I will not be buying another Roland synth.
i loved the pad editor. then when apple upgraded the operating system i lost it. and roland pulled it . i used it to adjust the filters and oscilators.
The support to keep an iPad app is insane and requires lots of updates because of how much they're constantly changing XCODE. They probably outsource it to be frank. It's rather annoying for companies that don't just make iOS software. I notice a lot of developers struggle to keep support for their hardware going on Apple products.
@@SPAZZOID100 You realize that some very popular classic synths had bulky midi boxes for editing the patches, right? How is an iPad touch screen editor any different? dont be dumb.
After this video I get it why they went digital. Instead of giving us only one Jupiter 8, they enclosed more of the analog synths, filters, and gave us much more versatility. All that with, probably the best emulation technology we have today. I am getting warmed for Jupiter X, thanks for the video!
Aleksandar Ivanov Well the best emulation in Roland is the ACB which is the Roland System 8 but this is one of the most versatile synths along with the Jupiter 80 except this is what people want but with analog you can’t do as much versatility or it may take like years and years and years to finally create a versatile analog that’s why they went to modelling route.
@@tuneunleashed Is this not ACB? And you say ACB sounds better? Do you say then, that System 8 and boutique series sound better then Jupiter X when emulating J8 and the old Junos?
Aleksandar Ivanov Yes it does it sounds more authentic no sound is better than the other it just has more detail then the Jupiter-X. That’s why the Roland System-8 is more limited compare to the Jupiter-X. As the Jupiter-X has 256 notes of polyphony, 61 Keys (etc) it’s just better overall synth inside out in my opinion except the authenticity of the Roland System-8 it feels more alive it’s accuracy is dead on to Roland’s vintage analog synths but....you won’t know a difference they both sound so good once you put them in the mix you won’t know a difference but the system-8 is indeed a better alternative if you can’t afford the Roland Jupiter-X especially at this time! I will go what’s best for me...so I’m going with the X. Nothing is better than the other but in terms of looks the X is just too beautiful and iconic. Definitely my second and last synth I will ever get for the next 40years!
@@tuneunleashed Thanks for the explanation, Lordtunes. I myself lean more toward Jupiter X as well. They just nailed it with the design, it looks awesome. Fantom as well. I hope you wont mind me for asking, but where did you get that info that S8 sounds more authentic? Did you actually hear the sound yourself? Can you hear that S8 has more details just by listening to these kind of demos? This really interest me, because I did not notice that, and I watched many demos.
Aleksandar Ivanov Yep search up MR. Tuna music Roland Jupiter-X vs System-8. The System-8 has more detail but you know what you will be better with the Jupiter-X trust me. It’s better overall.
Initially a steep learning curve but, once you've got it, you've got it. Remembering back to the U + D series. Very similar file/sound management concepts. The models do exactly as expected. A bit of practice for some of them.
It’s just so strange Roland did actual analog with the JDXa and even SE02 and they refuse to explore it further. I spoke to them about it and they said “The Jupiter series is about offering performance features and multitimbrality and no analog synth can do that.” “Your own JDXa just did all that. All you had to do was just do a Jupiter 10. 10 voices with 10 part multitimbrality (alternating between 10 mono synths or polystack mode), step sequencer, arpeggiator, built in Effects and a module version that you could polychain with the keyboard version to get up to 20 voices of analog power. That’s it. Now their stuff just has way too much crossover.
@Chris Trevanion Lets not forget the Prologue that has gone down in price and is a steal right now. 16 voices with 2 analog VCOs per voice and an extra Digital one that can sound like a VA with the right plugin (16 slots on the dig osc to fill). Or one can do, as it is bi-timbral, 8 voices that has 4VCOs per voice, 2 LFOs, Split filter, 2 EG, 2 amp EG.... I mean, that is one hefty 8 voiced analog synth.
Chris Trevanion The JDXa was four voices of DCO on the analog side. You also have to remember most Roland products are made overseas while Sequential and Moog are made in the USA.
When I saw the JDXa for a first time, I was delighted with its synth analog engine mixed with digital SN sounds. Also the design and interface of that synth is phenomenal to me, reminds me on JD800. But what bothered me was the shorter keybed and only 4 octaves. I think 4 voice analog sounds +64 voice SN digital sounds litteraly begs for 61 high quality keybed with full size keys ( there are eight individual parts - four analogue and four digital - that can be zoned over any span of keys). Now, when I see that this analog thing is in fashion (Korg, Behringer, Novation, DSI, etc), I expected that Roland will evolve synth arhitecture of JDXa by adding 4 more analog voice poly to the existing 4 voice analog poly (8 poly total), leave SN as it is and put 5 octaves high quality keybed with aftertouch. Instead, Roland decided to leave that path and to go with fully digital VA with 5 octaves flagship model. Design of this JupiterX is also very nice.
you can't export patches from the jup x to the fantom as stated at 3:15 - there's no tone export function (yet). There is a tone import so zencore tones made on the fantom can be brought in.
There are definitely some heated debates on synth nerd forums on everything from physical design and user interface to sound and synthesis functionality or lack thereof. The biggest complaint about synth functionality seems to be inabilities to do filter FM as some of the analog synths modeled. That takes considerable computational power to pull of convincingly in the digital realm and is still not always pleasing to the analog purists.
people are hating on it because they're silly. they did the same snobbery when jupiter 80 came out, which was one of the most underappreciated machines
I'm guessing the nay sayers want an actual Roland analog synth rather than something modeled no matter how close the models come to sounding authentic. I've been eying the XM for years. I'm gonna grab one before the end of the year
The Roland Jupiter-X will be the most slept on synthesizer on the market! Literally! This is exactly what I needed. A V-Synth GT, Gaia SH-01,Jupiter 80 , System-8 type of synth I’ve been looking for. This is literally the perfect secondary synthesizer of all time next to your workstation what ever you have. This is the best secondary synth of all time!!! may not be better than a Jupiter 80 in certain areas but since I have the Montage 8 it really doesn’t matter and the Roland System-8 in terms of analog emulation which I don’t care personally.....this is just right for me!!!! It’s a God sent synthesizer. Next to your Montage, Nord, Kronos, Dixibell what ever you have like this thing is mad lethal I would take this over any Moog under the Moog One in terms of its versatility you can’t really get that with a Moog other than its pure warm analog sounds. Hard to chose between the Nord Wave 2 though after Parris Bowens performance on it and the Roland JP-X since it’s the synth I’ve not wanted but needed! I will need to test them both can’t wait 😊 once things get better lol. Roland Jupiter-X and Omnisphere integration together is RIP to the rest of the world it’s just too OP!!!(Overpowered). Yet I still feel like it’s very underrated synth.
Should have never sold my Jupiter 8 12 years ago for 3 grand. About the going rate back then. The Jupiter X looks like a nice performance synth though. Looking at the semi old school layout makes me sad.
@@fawkkyutuu8851 Never going to happen. They no longer have the infrastructure for analog parts. They'd have to outsource like they did with the partnership with Studio Electronics SE-02 Boutique.
glad he's been taught how to use a Jupiter X, now he realises how cool it is without pre judging it on out of the box frustration :) there are other synths out there that i've owned that are waaaaay more complicated, jupiter makes sense after a short time.
has there been a 3rd video after that one where he was bummed out while playing it in the Andertons room? i've only seen this one and the unboxing where he seemed sad to be playing the synth the entire time lol
@@akibe7608 I finally got mine (the Jupiter-X) just a little while ago, after lusting after it for years... It has its quirks, as all Rolands do, but I'm loving it so far. You need to put your time in, but once you get the hang of it, it's just simply superb. Despite the retro looks, the JP-80 was pretty much a completely different synth, built on the technology of that time. Back then, it was all about their SuperNatural engine, which emulated not only VA synth tones but especially "realistic" ones like strings, horns, pianos, ethnic instruments. The JP-X is more about emulating their classic synths - although it does have "normal" stuff in there as well with the PCM stuff - and the Zen-Core bit. The JP-80 and its SN tones were famous for emulating expressive instruments like Erhu really convicingly - the JP-X does none of that. It's all about emulating those classic synths. The cool thing about the X is, as the demo guy says in this video, is the option to layer Zenology sounds with the retro models. Or layer or split up to four different tones in a Scene. Also, the JP-80 was operated and edited almost exclusively in its smallish touch screen (the fad of the day), and it really lacked hands on controls - the JP-X has lots. Although you do end up diving quite a bit in the tiny menu screen - Chorus options are all there, for instance - another Roland trend unfortunately. The JP-X is built well, but I'm not a huge fan of the keybed. I expected it to be better at this price point. I think the one on the JP-80 and even the newer Fantoms is better. Also, as you have probably read from forum comments, the aftertouch on it almost unuseable, it's so hard to trigger. The Fantom is even worse.
So there we have it, the Roland KingKorg. Got a KingKorg as a Jupiter 50, not a Korg or Roland guy, I like both (as I do Moog). The Jup50 is a PIA to edit without tablet but it sounds the lot. The KingKorg is a bit easier for editing and sounds great as well. Now the Jupiter X (didn't think much of the Xm due to the price, pots instead of sliders and keys) is a serious synth to my likings, even the price is pretty good. The only let down might be 4 parts + 1 drum and maybe polyphony.
I wish I could send you a picture… I own a 1974 Roland SH 1000 synthesizer. It weighs probably 30 pounds or more it’s the most beautiful instrument that I own , besides my 58 Gibson I’ve been playing it for 40 years. It is monophonic and it is one of the first synthesizers made for traveling band use or home synthesizing. Look it up on RUclips please it is called the Roland SH 1000. Please take care everyone
Does it fuck. It sounds awful. Nothing like a real jupiter or any analog synth. Prologue 16 sounds GREAT. OB-6 sounds GREAT.. even the system 8 sounds better than this and that sounds crap!
As an 80's girl, I'd agree that the few reviews we've had haven't exactly made it 'pop' compared to the years some of us have been listening - but many a demo is guilty of that. As always it will be worth seeing it put in the hands of someone productive and skilled. That said Jack/Andertons do usually do better in that regard. Out of the others you've mentioned, OB/Sys8 are reasonable for sure; but it is a bit of a 'strength/features pick and mix'. In that what one does well, another will do someplace else. I would regard their sound output, much like the Novation series to be higher quality (initial review wise) than this - but Jupiter was the sound of the past. So it deserves some development time. These days spec battles are going a bit too far. We should remind mindful of output quality. The only thing to avoid out of your list of options is the Korg. They make utterly dated garbage and everything they have is either missing simple features, unstable or over a decade old and really showing its age. If you are going to avoid this, then definitely avoid them lol.
This Keyboard will do well. A learning curve but it's worth it to delve into it . It's a Tank which I ❤️. Sounds great. I have a 0B6. MOOG XL. MOOG MODEL D. Going to pull the trigger on Jupiter X.
After many conversations and watching these demos...my opinion is...If you have Roland Fantom with the model expansions you don't need the $2600 Jupiter X. This was a question I had for more than a few people . I was given a bum stear and had an X for for 6 days, it cost me $100 in BS fees...but...I now have a Polybrute on the way. Mark Bensette Aux Bois 🇨🇦.
I do hope they put in to the JUPITER-X the oscillator sync & cross/ring mod sounds patches like the early Jupiters had please and sliders where the knobs are please just like the Jupiter's +Juno's please thank you regards
Jack, what does your practice routine look like? Like, since you don't read music how did you learn all that you know? Even when you're just making stuff up you always seem to know where to go melodically. How did you make sense of it all?
Cyprus Glenn - I’d guess that he’s been fiddling with synths since he was a kiddy. A combination of lots of noodling and an ear for melody helps. The great thing about learning to play melodies is that if it’s wrong - it sounds wrong. No need to get bogged down with scales etc, if the note sounds right it is right :)
Same as me prob, playing since a kid, you learn chords, you learn what works... even though I can read music (slowly) you don't need it at all... it's about experience and just knowing. I play the piano too though. Proper players never 'think', they just feel... it's instinctive, even improvisation, it's actually HARD for me to play anything that sounds out of tune... really fkin difficult, my brain just won't let me (player for 30+ years)
@@leftmono1016 This is true, people who over-think instrument learning often end up not getting anywhere/giving up or making shit music. You just gotta play play play.. if it was good enough for the Beatles it's good enough for us! I play synths, piano, bass, guitar and drums.. all self taught and good enough to get music on TV, I started as a kid and I guess you either got it or you don't. Being 'taught' is good if your'e going to play cellos in an orchestra or other such thing but for rock n roll ;) and rock instruments... JUST FUCKING PLAY! AND GET GOOD! SELF START!
Supernatural Jupiter engine was great, System 8 ACB jupiter is great, Jupiter X Zencore Jupiter sounds great. System 8 probably sounds best out of them all but its also the one ive spent alot of time with so maybe im biased.
I loved your detailed Nord Wave 2 presentation, but I haven't given up on the Roland Jupiter X either. Both are live-gigging instruments, tough to decide!
I do not understand the placement of the output jacks on this Jupiter-X. They are in the direct middle of the rear panel. Not good for those that use column stands. I think Roland took the exact output board from the Xm and stuck it in the middle.
The I-Arpeggiator is Roland’s answer to Karma about 18 years late. Edit: I wonder if it is possible that the patents on Karma prevented Roland from practicing similar technology.
Lots of hate all over the web for this Synth and the Roland Cloud in general. I don’t get it. A great tome to be a synth player or musician. Spoiled for choice. I’ve got the yearly cloud subscription and love it.
well where to begin with that one i don't like it spent a few hours on one and for me it had some of the worst presets ever on a synth and i am fed up with roland nostalgia products that offer nothing new just heres yet more classic roland sounds whats happened to innovation and building a synth for 2021 rather then the fantom 7 and this and both of them are essentially nostalgia products just a company out of ideas and seriously lost track of the market but then its not even proper roland anymore its just some hedge fund reworking the catalog of roland for 1200 it would be worth a punt but 2500 nah no thinks think just get a montage 6 or a kronos or a wavestate thats why no one likes it
@@djdarksidejungle559 I get your point certainly on the pricing , but I like the nostalgia of the Roland synths.... just don’t understand all the hate they seem to be getting......and there are super alternatives now for innovation synths withe the likes of Arturias Hardware synths and dare I say Behringers cloned efforts ..... I was looking at the wavestate. Looks a super synth.
@@JamesBermingham i got a wavestate and its brilliant but korg have done one better the modwave and that look really good so good in fact i'm buying one roland have lost tracl pf the market its a shame but to be honest its not even roland anymore last synth they did that was made in japan by the proper rol;and corppration was the jupiter 50/80 and they were good synths and nothing wrong with sioernatrial but alas that was the last innovation by rolnd its just as hedge fund reworking the back catalog and using things that should have never seen light of day out of their RnD labs and putting them on expensive synths that aren't very good
@@JamesBermingham meanwhile korg are corning the market with cheap but excellent synths that kick rather then 1500 on a jupiter xM which in my opinion is just a synth from a company out of ideas and are gonna go bust if they carry on while korg corner the market with cheap but exzcellent expensive innovative synth engines but for pennies
@@JamesBermingham i know guys who bought the fantom and they all wish they'd bought the monatge 6 and for that money i'd be buying a montage as well not 3 big ones on yet anothert peice of sh!t but roland it saddens me to see how far roland have fgallen but there it is
So, I would love some clarity. Can i load a Jupiter x patch onto my fantom 6? Sounds like the advertising says yes, but the reality is.... no? I would like to load patch 1a of the Jupiter x into my fantom 6... where can i download this patch please? How is it done? I was told that this is the highlight feature of Zencore. Exchanging patches. Please clarify!
Keyboard players are going to hate me but I wish there was a smaller version of this board, between the this one and the Xm like a 49 key. 22:40 - Jack! LOL!
It's a nice alternative for people who want more versatility. Personally I just want the best possible emulations of the analog classics and a physical control for every function, so I'd never give up my System-8 for one of these.
It's baffling to see that the Jupiter 8 only had two oscillators so you can only choose two on the Jupiter 8 engine and the other two oscillators just aren't available. What are these guys thinking?
Dang, I got a rack full of 90s synths, and an XV5080. Wouldn't it be nice to replace them all with a Jupiter X. I'm a lazy home studio rat anyway. I mostly use VSTs, but I do like real keyboards for some stuff.
LOL, don't kid yourself you're getting even ONE real jupiter 8 sound let alone 2. This piece of shit is already out-classed by softsynths (inc rolands own VST Jupiter 8 which uses ACB which his superior to Jupiter X's PCM engine.. but still poor vs real analog like Korg Prologue 16 or Ob-6)
Because it sounds amazing, gives you the same control as the old synths but many of them, and it’s set up for live performance, and it looks cool as hell, and it’s styled for use and not menu diving.
@@joechristopher5803 It sounds NOTHING like "the old synths", get your ears checked. You're the sheep that keep Roland doing this scam stuff to people over and over. Jupiter X sounds like SHIT, even for digital, and certainly sounds and reacts nothing like real analog. Korg got it right with the Prologue 16 and the genuine VCOs/real analog filter. OB-6 also hands jupiter X it's ass on a plate for sound. Only morons will buy this Jupiter x cos it's dressed up to look like a really shitty/fisher price version of the real thing but sounds NOTHING like it. LOL. Carry on.. mugs!
I still don’t love the I arp. It’s not a particular sound I like… I never use it on mine.. most of the rhythms I can’t imagine in any genre. The updates still haven’t made it easy to just rock all the OG arp types.
We love what you guys are doing! But for F***’s sake wear protective masks...we still want to see you doing these demos in the future....food for thought guys! Anderton’s ROCK so do the world’s favorite queen right and follow her advice.
Bailed on this after 5 minutes. Jack is the most obnoxious, annoying presenter/host ever. I couldn't take his idiotic comments and behavior anymore. I'll go watch a competitor's video instead.
Crikey, really am sorry I came off that way on here. I can totally see why you say that. Sometimes my "over excitement" definitely gets the better of me and I should just keep my mouth shut, hate when I watch these back and I see myself jumping in like an impatient Puppy!! Been trying to work on it but clearly need to dial "it" back some more, thanks for letting us know and taking the time to leave the feedback. Apologies again Sir and fingers crossed next time you stumble across a video I won't come across as such a "Helmet"! X
Jack Duxbury Not your fault Jack be you and do you!!! That’s why people subscribe to your Chanel for. I would have done the same....I mean come on......it’s a Roland Jupiter-X! They’re just haters Jack! Rooting for ya!
@@jackduxbury1632 Cool that you are aware of it, sometimes it is too much, and does not seem like a genuine reaction. Circuit heating emulation is a really nice touch and attention to details, but it is not a world changing thing to lose your head about it. You can emulate pretty much anything these days if you are willing to spend some time. Not talking about those goofy reactions after you play, keep them, they are actually cool. Just that kind off non genuine excitement.
@@aleksandari.7834 He always comes across like he's trying to SELL you stuff based on his enthusiasm, I'm not trusting it at all. And yeah, obnoxious as hell.
This sounds absolutely TERRIBLE. It's nothing like analog at all. Don't care what Roland pretend they want "Jupiter" to be about, it's clear they are cashing in again on a legacy that was earned on analog TONE not original concept. Just sounds so fake, flat and plastic. FGS people get REAL analog... if you can't stretch to an OB-6 (gorgeous sound - best sound on the market currently), then a Korg Prologue 16 voice VCO is stunning, and cheaper than this digital mess! Korg deserves your support. The Prologue sounds amazing and can still do weird/digital stuff at times too... this JP-X is for fools who just want something that looks like a Jupiter 8 regardless of how bad it sounds. Prologue can actually SOUND like A jupiter 8, this can't!
Again stop pushing this nonsense on every video. Korg have obviously bought you out. Prologue is a failed board. Both in native features and versatility. It was so, in order to maintain its pricepoint. If it wasn't for a few minute details it would be surpassed by the XD version of its little brother for heavens sake. It is overpriced junk. The OB is a different board aimed at a different group comparatively. Would be like me taking the Novation boards and benching them next to the outdated Kronos. Rather pointless. We get it, you are a brainless Korg shill. Now fuck of elsewhere and take your Korg crap with you.
All videos seen at this current time have been shot and/or edited prior to any guidance around isolation and social distancing. We will be ensuring presenters follow social distancing guidelines along with following the daily updates issued.
Stay Safe.
Team Andertons. 🤘❤️
I understand Team Andertons have to CYA but have we become as a society so sensitive, petty and bored to report a video showing 2 humans less than 6 feet away from each other? Too bad all this and it wasn’t even Ebola or something that will kill healthy people under 80, make a 20yr old healthy athlete bleed from their eyes within 2 days of acquiring the virus.
Great Video!
Woopty doo Basil..!
I honestly can't take any more of this coronabollocks.
@@BRAVETHECOLD This comment didn't age well.
Just stop. Don't be a daft kunte.
My mums dog is sitting on my knee. When you hit the chord in tune, nothing. When the temp was dropped and you hit it out of tune she jumped up, turned round and stared into my soul hahaha! 😂
One of the best JP-X demos at the moment. Just ordered mine.
I envy you so much! Have fun.
Also, once you get it, could you share your experience with it here?
So glad to finally see some coverage on the Jupiter X, awesome video guys!
Just preordered one of these beasts today. Can’t wait to play on it.
YESS THANK GOD!!!! Finally we have a review!!!!
This is the best synth ever created. I need it now and I'm going to sell a nut
You're so awesome Jack. Don't ever stop.
Speakers in a synth is actually a very cool feature I wish more manufactures would implement. In fact, one of the things severely lacking in almost all piano action keyboards is the vibration feedback aspect of an acoustic instrument. Sit behind even the cheapest barely in tune piano, and the feel is so direct. Not just string overtones, but the vibration of the harp and wood is connective physical feedback. A light touch gives you an ever so slight buzz to your finger tips, and play a heavy chord like the end of A Day In The Life and you feel a real visceral vibration up your arms and even through your entire body. You don't even need speakers, just put some type of iPhone type vibration feedback mechanism into a keyboard. Hammond tone wheels even buzz and hum and you can feel them when you play them. This is a step in the right direction Roland!
That is a very interesting point! Feedback feel would never cross my mind. Andy also gave a pretty good reason why they've included speakers. With those two, it is truly a step in the right direction, I agree. If you don't like them, you can always turn them off.
Dennis Ristow Thank you!!! The vibrations are a huge part of what makes an instrument an instrument. I've thought about that taptic feedback method as well as a way of getting the feeling without the crappy sound that sometimes comes with internal speakers.
We're going to need a sample pack of Jack's best moments for when we run out of pre-recorded content.
Looks like we could create a series from those moments... 😉
@@AndertonsKeyboardDept - Golden Poodle springs to mind!!!
I'm intrigued
Black Moses Beats .... ruclips.net/video/wyiTT5WzMcQ/видео.html jump to 23 mins in...
@@geoffwebber8272 seconded
As someone just found out on the gearslutz site , the abm models in the jupiter x and xm is essentially the basic zen-core engine with scaled parameters (dependent on the chosen synth model ) and a hidden input gain for the filters .
So if roland really wanted ,they could just add the vintage models to the mc707 and the fantom .
They did to the Fantom.
@@xp50player
Those are NOT acb models
Check the difference between ACB and ABM
Roland just confuses people , no wonder the majority thinks ABM is the same as ACB , but it's not
ACB is far superior
Why give the Fantom the analog filter and not this? Blows my mind.
Could they also give it a sampled Osc from the old synths, to go with analog filter? That would probably satisfy many people asking for a pure analog.
@@aleksandari.7834 Jupiter X does use samples. its just an advanced rompler.
Great review buddy. Great energy as usual. Sweet playing.
After Roland pulled the iPad Editor for the Jupiter 80 (which made editing of the complex innards much easier), I will not be buying another Roland synth.
Editors for hardware are stupid.
i loved the pad editor. then when apple upgraded the operating system i lost it. and roland pulled it . i used it to adjust the filters and oscilators.
The support to keep an iPad app is insane and requires lots of updates because of how much they're constantly changing XCODE. They probably outsource it to be frank. It's rather annoying for companies that don't just make iOS software. I notice a lot of developers struggle to keep support for their hardware going on Apple products.
@@SPAZZOID100 You realize that some very popular classic synths had bulky midi boxes for editing the patches, right? How is an iPad touch screen editor any different? dont be dumb.
After this video I get it why they went digital. Instead of giving us only one Jupiter 8, they enclosed more of the analog synths, filters, and gave us much more versatility. All that with, probably the best emulation technology we have today. I am getting warmed for Jupiter X, thanks for the video!
Aleksandar Ivanov Well the best emulation in Roland is the ACB which is the Roland System 8 but this is one of the most versatile synths along with the Jupiter 80 except this is what people want but with analog you can’t do as much versatility or it may take like years and years and years to finally create a versatile analog that’s why they went to modelling route.
@@tuneunleashed Is this not ACB? And you say ACB sounds better? Do you say then, that System 8 and boutique series sound better then Jupiter X when emulating J8 and the old Junos?
Aleksandar Ivanov Yes it does it sounds more authentic no sound is better than the other it just has more detail then the Jupiter-X. That’s why the Roland System-8 is more limited compare to the Jupiter-X. As the Jupiter-X has 256 notes of polyphony, 61 Keys (etc) it’s just better overall synth inside out in my opinion except the authenticity of the Roland System-8 it feels more alive it’s accuracy is dead on to Roland’s vintage analog synths but....you won’t know a difference they both sound so good once you put them in the mix you won’t know a difference but the system-8 is indeed a better alternative if you can’t afford the Roland Jupiter-X especially at this time! I will go what’s best for me...so I’m going with the X. Nothing is better than the other but in terms of looks the X is just too beautiful and iconic. Definitely my second and last synth I will ever get for the next 40years!
@@tuneunleashed Thanks for the explanation, Lordtunes. I myself lean more toward Jupiter X as well. They just nailed it with the design, it looks awesome. Fantom as well.
I hope you wont mind me for asking, but where did you get that info that S8 sounds more authentic? Did you actually hear the sound yourself? Can you hear that S8 has more details just by listening to these kind of demos? This really interest me, because I did not notice that, and I watched many demos.
Aleksandar Ivanov Yep search up MR. Tuna music Roland Jupiter-X vs System-8. The System-8 has more detail but you know what you will be better with the Jupiter-X trust me. It’s better overall.
All the cool kids want a synth that looks like an 80s analog beast but also has Arranger Keyboard features.
Arranger? no man....
Rick Roll front and center on the table.
I love my XM!
Not me. 🤷♂️
Fantastique....😮
Ice cube said, "I have to say it was a good day"
Initially a steep learning curve but, once you've got it, you've got it. Remembering back to the U + D series. Very similar file/sound management concepts. The models do exactly as expected. A bit of practice for some of them.
It’s just so strange Roland did actual analog with the JDXa and even SE02 and they refuse to explore it further. I spoke to them about it and they said “The Jupiter series is about offering performance features and multitimbrality and no analog synth can do that.” “Your own JDXa just did all that. All you had to do was just do a Jupiter 10. 10 voices with 10 part multitimbrality (alternating between 10 mono synths or polystack mode), step sequencer, arpeggiator, built in Effects and a module version that you could polychain with the keyboard version to get up to 20 voices of analog power. That’s it. Now their stuff just has way too much crossover.
@Chris Trevanion Well just check the Moog One and you have your answer right? :)
@Chris Trevanion Lets not forget the Prologue that has gone down in price and is a steal right now. 16 voices with 2 analog VCOs per voice and an extra Digital one that can sound like a VA with the right plugin (16 slots on the dig osc to fill).
Or one can do, as it is bi-timbral, 8 voices that has 4VCOs per voice, 2 LFOs, Split filter, 2 EG, 2 amp EG.... I mean, that is one hefty 8 voiced analog synth.
Chris Trevanion Just wait for Behringer selling it for 1200€.
Chris Trevanion The JDXa was four voices of DCO on the analog side. You also have to remember most Roland products are made overseas while Sequential and Moog are made in the USA.
When I saw the JDXa for a first time, I was delighted with its synth analog engine mixed with digital SN sounds. Also the design and interface of that synth is phenomenal to me, reminds me on JD800. But what bothered me was the shorter keybed and only 4 octaves. I think 4 voice analog sounds +64 voice SN digital sounds litteraly begs for 61 high quality keybed with full size keys ( there are eight individual parts - four analogue and four digital - that can be zoned over any span of keys).
Now, when I see that this analog thing is in fashion (Korg, Behringer, Novation, DSI, etc), I expected that Roland will evolve synth arhitecture of JDXa by adding 4 more analog voice poly to the existing 4 voice analog poly (8 poly total), leave SN as it is and put 5 octaves high quality keybed with aftertouch.
Instead, Roland decided to leave that path and to go with fully digital VA with 5 octaves flagship model. Design of this JupiterX is also very nice.
Super super smooth.
don't forget Super Super Clean
you can't export patches from the jup x to the fantom as stated at 3:15 - there's no tone export function (yet). There is a tone import so zencore tones made on the fantom can be brought in.
Synth snobs are worse than guitar snobs. Why are people hating on this thing?
There are definitely some heated debates on synth nerd forums on everything from physical design and user interface to sound and synthesis functionality or lack thereof. The biggest complaint about synth functionality seems to be inabilities to do filter FM as some of the analog synths modeled. That takes considerable computational power to pull of convincingly in the digital realm and is still not always pleasing to the analog purists.
people are hating on it because they're silly. they did the same snobbery when jupiter 80 came out, which was one of the most underappreciated machines
I love the reviews that call it "plastic garbage" without ever putting hands on it physically. 😂
They know no better I bought the XM Roland gives you more bang for the buck.
They don't know history and quality
I'm guessing the nay sayers want an actual Roland analog synth rather than something modeled no matter how close the models come to sounding authentic. I've been eying the XM for years. I'm gonna grab one before the end of the year
Bloody love this intro to it! Best one I’ve watched
Beast of a synth. I want one. Now.
The Roland Jupiter-X will be the most slept on synthesizer on the market! Literally! This is exactly what I needed. A V-Synth GT, Gaia SH-01,Jupiter 80 , System-8 type of synth I’ve been looking for. This is literally the perfect secondary synthesizer of all time next to your workstation what ever you have. This is the best secondary synth of all time!!! may not be better than a Jupiter 80 in certain areas but since I have the Montage 8 it really doesn’t matter and the Roland System-8 in terms
of analog emulation which I don’t care personally.....this is just right for me!!!! It’s a God sent synthesizer. Next to your Montage, Nord, Kronos, Dixibell what ever you have like this thing is mad lethal I would take this over any Moog under the Moog One in terms of its versatility you can’t really get that with a Moog other than its pure warm analog sounds. Hard to chose between the Nord Wave 2 though after Parris Bowens performance on it and the Roland JP-X since it’s the synth I’ve not wanted but needed! I will need to test them both can’t wait 😊 once things get better lol. Roland Jupiter-X and Omnisphere integration together is RIP to the rest of the world it’s just too OP!!!(Overpowered). Yet I still feel like it’s very underrated synth.
if you already have montage and system 8 you're pretty much covered. you don't even need a Jupiter x.
i have an analog four Mkii next to my System 8. Now that is a deadly combo!
Jack...Thanks for this one....I re-watched and took a shot of Bullet Bourbon every time you said Gubbins😂😂😂😂....🥃 it's my choice word now🥴...😵😪😴
Should have never sold my Jupiter 8 12 years ago for 3 grand. About the going rate back then. The Jupiter X looks like a nice performance synth though. Looking at the semi old school layout makes me sad.
Lets hope one day they remake It.
@@fawkkyutuu8851 Never going to happen. They no longer have the infrastructure for analog parts. They'd have to outsource like they did with the partnership with Studio Electronics SE-02 Boutique.
I finally understand Roland's vision. This is incredible!
Need to get my hands on this!
If I were actually any good at playing the piano, I would buy one of these. Seems absolutely amazing! 😄 And it looks so cool.
Damn, now you make me buy one....glad you did!!🤣🤣🤣
I don't want a great workstation, I want a great synth, I want a Jupiter 8! 😎
Great synth? Jupiter-X or SH-4D. Great workstation is Fantom-06, FA-06, 2019 Fantom or the older Fantoms like the Fantom G.
glad he's been taught how to use a Jupiter X, now he realises how cool it is without pre judging it on out of the box frustration :) there are other synths out there that i've owned that are waaaaay more complicated, jupiter makes sense after a short time.
You seem to know what you're talking about. How does this thing compare to the Jupiter 80?
has there been a 3rd video after that one where he was bummed out while playing it in the Andertons room? i've only seen this one and the unboxing where he seemed sad to be playing the synth the entire time lol
@@akibe7608 I finally got mine (the Jupiter-X) just a little while ago, after lusting after it for years... It has its quirks, as all Rolands do, but I'm loving it so far. You need to put your time in, but once you get the hang of it, it's just simply superb. Despite the retro looks, the JP-80 was pretty much a completely different synth, built on the technology of that time. Back then, it was all about their SuperNatural engine, which emulated not only VA synth tones but especially "realistic" ones like strings, horns, pianos, ethnic instruments. The JP-X is more about emulating their classic synths - although it does have "normal" stuff in there as well with the PCM stuff - and the Zen-Core bit.
The JP-80 and its SN tones were famous for emulating expressive instruments like Erhu really convicingly - the JP-X does none of that. It's all about emulating those classic synths. The cool thing about the X is, as the demo guy says in this video, is the option to layer Zenology sounds with the retro models. Or layer or split up to four different tones in a Scene.
Also, the JP-80 was operated and edited almost exclusively in its smallish touch screen (the fad of the day), and it really lacked hands on controls - the JP-X has lots. Although you do end up diving quite a bit in the tiny menu screen - Chorus options are all there, for instance - another Roland trend unfortunately.
The JP-X is built well, but I'm not a huge fan of the keybed. I expected it to be better at this price point. I think the one on the JP-80 and even the newer Fantoms is better. Also, as you have probably read from forum comments, the aftertouch on it almost unuseable, it's so hard to trigger. The Fantom is even worse.
So there we have it, the Roland KingKorg.
Got a KingKorg as a Jupiter 50, not a Korg or Roland guy, I like both (as I do Moog).
The Jup50 is a PIA to edit without tablet but it sounds the lot.
The KingKorg is a bit easier for editing and sounds great as well.
Now the Jupiter X (didn't think much of the Xm due to the price, pots instead of sliders and keys) is a serious synth to my likings, even the price is pretty good. The only let down might be 4 parts + 1 drum and maybe polyphony.
i love my king korg....it has amazing filters. i also love my jupiter 80. so i will pass on this and buy a system 8 cheap on the used market.
Well, there is one person who thinks speakers in a synthesizer are a good idea. They add extra weight and cost.
BANG!
Anderton I missed your channel I went away to space for a while but I'm back this is a nice synth I Love Roland
"Cool...but what does the INIT patch sound like?!" 😂 Sorry, the comments section was lacking in Synthnerd Smugitude. Just trynna do my part.😂
So this is a Tesla, simulating a Ferrari
This synth really needs that screen and UI from the MC-707, right there in the middle, on a 8-10" screen.
That'd be so comfy.
Or how about a screen like Fantom G had. or even MC-909. nice big fat screen. Roland hates screens....
That's it, I'm buying one.
I wish I could send you a picture… I own a 1974 Roland SH 1000 synthesizer. It weighs probably 30 pounds or more it’s the most beautiful instrument that I own , besides my 58 Gibson
I’ve been playing it for 40 years. It is monophonic and it is one of the first synthesizers made for traveling band use or home synthesizing. Look it up on RUclips please it is called the Roland SH 1000. Please take care everyone
I also have the SH1000 and also the 2000. Absolutely beautiful synths. I hope they can bring an emulation of these to the Jupiter X, would be awesome.
i remember seeing this beast in the local music store
amazing BEAST
Seeing it when??? It is barely out yet.
Sounds great!
Does it fuck. It sounds awful. Nothing like a real jupiter or any analog synth. Prologue 16 sounds GREAT. OB-6 sounds GREAT.. even the system 8 sounds better than this and that sounds crap!
As an 80's girl, I'd agree that the few reviews we've had haven't exactly made it 'pop' compared to the years some of us have been listening - but many a demo is guilty of that. As always it will be worth seeing it put in the hands of someone productive and skilled. That said Jack/Andertons do usually do better in that regard. Out of the others you've mentioned, OB/Sys8 are reasonable for sure; but it is a bit of a 'strength/features pick and mix'. In that what one does well, another will do someplace else. I would regard their sound output, much like the Novation series to be higher quality (initial review wise) than this - but Jupiter was the sound of the past. So it deserves some development time.
These days spec battles are going a bit too far. We should remind mindful of output quality. The only thing to avoid out of your list of options is the Korg. They make utterly dated garbage and everything they have is either missing simple features, unstable or over a decade old and really showing its age. If you are going to avoid this, then definitely avoid them lol.
This Keyboard will do well.
A learning curve but it's worth it to delve into it .
It's a Tank which I ❤️.
Sounds great.
I have a 0B6.
MOOG XL.
MOOG MODEL D.
Going to pull the trigger on Jupiter X.
After many conversations and watching these demos...my opinion is...If you have Roland Fantom with the model expansions you don't need the $2600 Jupiter X. This was a question I had for more than a few people .
I was given a bum stear and had an X for for 6 days, it cost me $100 in BS fees...but...I now have a Polybrute on the way. Mark Bensette Aux Bois 🇨🇦.
I do hope they put in to the JUPITER-X the oscillator sync & cross/ring mod sounds patches like the early Jupiters had please and sliders where the knobs are please just like the Jupiter's +Juno's please thank you regards
Dang! Jupiter just sounds so good 🤤
Understatement.
Jack, what does your practice routine look like? Like, since you don't read music how did you learn all that you know? Even when you're just making stuff up you always seem to know where to go melodically. How did you make sense of it all?
Cyprus Glenn - I’d guess that he’s been fiddling with synths since he was a kiddy. A combination of lots of noodling and an ear for melody helps. The great thing about learning to play melodies is that if it’s wrong - it sounds wrong. No need to get bogged down with scales etc, if the note sounds right it is right :)
Same as me prob, playing since a kid, you learn chords, you learn what works... even though I can read music (slowly) you don't need it at all... it's about experience and just knowing. I play the piano too though. Proper players never 'think', they just feel... it's instinctive, even improvisation, it's actually HARD for me to play anything that sounds out of tune... really fkin difficult, my brain just won't let me (player for 30+ years)
@@leftmono1016 This is true, people who over-think instrument learning often end up not getting anywhere/giving up or making shit music. You just gotta play play play.. if it was good enough for the Beatles it's good enough for us! I play synths, piano, bass, guitar and drums.. all self taught and good enough to get music on TV, I started as a kid and I guess you either got it or you don't. Being 'taught' is good if your'e going to play cellos in an orchestra or other such thing but for rock n roll ;) and rock instruments... JUST FUCKING PLAY! AND GET GOOD! SELF START!
Needs more piano. Would love the German expansion.
Even ENO doesn't demand "39 years ago in a room 14 degrees higher temp"
Does the i arprgiater have a cheese knob? Control the amount of cheese?
It's missing because Roland don't give edam.
@@jgh548 🤣🤣🤣
Jupiter X feels & sounds like a Jupiter
Supernatural Jupiter engine was great, System 8 ACB jupiter is great, Jupiter X Zencore Jupiter sounds great. System 8 probably sounds best out of them all but its also the one ive spent alot of time with so maybe im biased.
I swore that at 15:50 he was gunna start playing regulate hahaha
I loved your detailed Nord Wave 2 presentation, but I haven't given up on the Roland Jupiter X either. Both are live-gigging instruments, tough to decide!
Which one did you decide on? I’m in this same situation now.
Amazing
I do not understand the placement of the output jacks on this Jupiter-X. They are in the direct middle of the rear panel. Not good for those that use column stands. I think Roland took the exact output board from the Xm and stuck it in the middle.
The I-Arpeggiator is Roland’s answer to Karma about 18 years late. Edit: I wonder if it is possible that the patents on Karma prevented Roland from practicing similar technology.
dude on the left can play. !!
Does it have sequencer
Great video , looking at adding this to the korg atm. Might have to sell the fa08 first though ...😭
Lots of hate all over the web for this Synth and the Roland Cloud in general. I don’t get it. A great tome to be a synth player or musician. Spoiled for choice.
I’ve got the yearly cloud subscription and love it.
well where to begin with that one i don't like it spent a few hours on one and for me it had some of the worst presets ever on a synth and i am fed up with roland nostalgia products that offer nothing new just heres yet more classic roland sounds whats happened to innovation and building a synth for 2021 rather then the fantom 7 and this and both of them are essentially nostalgia products just a company out of ideas and seriously lost track of the market but then its not even proper roland anymore its just some hedge fund reworking the catalog of roland for 1200 it would be worth a punt but 2500 nah no thinks think just get a montage 6 or a kronos or a wavestate thats why no one likes it
@@djdarksidejungle559 I get your point certainly on the pricing , but I like the nostalgia of the Roland synths.... just don’t understand all the hate they seem to be getting......and there are super alternatives now for innovation synths withe the likes of Arturias Hardware synths and dare I say Behringers cloned efforts ..... I was looking at the wavestate. Looks a super synth.
@@JamesBermingham i got a wavestate and its brilliant but korg have done one better the modwave and that look really good so good in fact i'm buying one roland have lost tracl pf the market its a shame but to be honest its not even roland anymore last synth they did that was made in japan by the proper rol;and corppration was the jupiter 50/80 and they were good synths and nothing wrong with sioernatrial but alas that was the last innovation by rolnd its just as hedge fund reworking the back catalog and using things that should have never seen light of day out of their RnD labs and putting them on expensive synths that aren't very good
@@JamesBermingham meanwhile korg are corning the market with cheap but excellent synths that kick rather then 1500 on a jupiter xM which in my opinion is just a synth from a company out of ideas and are gonna go bust if they carry on while korg corner the market with cheap but exzcellent expensive innovative synth engines but for pennies
@@JamesBermingham i know guys who bought the fantom and they all wish they'd bought the monatge 6 and for that money i'd be buying a montage as well not 3 big ones on yet anothert peice of sh!t but roland it saddens me to see how far roland have fgallen but there it is
Jupiter 8 was used at PWL
So, I would love some clarity. Can i load a Jupiter x patch onto my fantom 6? Sounds like the advertising says yes, but the reality is.... no?
I would like to load patch 1a of the Jupiter x into my fantom 6... where can i download this patch please? How is it done?
I was told that this is the highlight feature of Zencore. Exchanging patches. Please clarify!
That display.. It's 2020.. Not '95
Same sliders next to pitch bend as my XP50 from around 95. Yukk this thing looks awful.
Every time I think that I may not be interest in this synth, someone else posts another great video of it. Stop it! LOL
lol!! You have the same last name as me. Weird!
What's the reference to the records underneath?
Seems a great instrument. Does anyone know whether it's also got any of the acoustic samples on it? Brass, saxophones, etc.?
Thank you
Why no buying a rompler or a juno Di Ds .... of Jupiter 80 or 50 ?
we dont want all filters but one easy analog filter... we dont want all digital oscil but one easy analog oscil XD
Speaker vibrations is so underrated!
Does this have the same keybed action as the roland fantom 6 or 76?
I keep thinking that guy is Peter Gabriel, in 1971.......
What did he say here 15:05 lol
System-8 kills this.
Spazzoid Studio - maybe just, in analog emulation. Not in layers, polyphony, key range, drums?, PCM sounds?,
No, it doesn’t.
xp50player i don’t need all that other shit.
genX sounds way warmer.
Other way around
Does it have that Juno chorus?
Keyboard players are going to hate me but I wish there was a smaller version of this board, between the this one and the Xm like a 49 key.
22:40 - Jack! LOL!
Does it have different or more sounds than the Fantom.
Over-promising as always. I would buy a second used System-8 instead.
It's a nice alternative for people who want more versatility. Personally I just want the best possible emulations of the analog classics and a physical control for every function, so I'd never give up my System-8 for one of these.
pcuimac Speak for yourself I see huge value in this synth
@@st0rmchild totally agree.the s8 is just so good.
It's baffling to see that the Jupiter 8 only had two oscillators so you can only choose two on the Jupiter 8 engine and the other two oscillators just aren't available. What are these guys thinking?
What is the name of the guy from Roland? Andy what?
Is it Super Super ?
Dang, I got a rack full of 90s synths, and an XV5080. Wouldn't it be nice to replace them all with a Jupiter X. I'm a lazy home studio rat anyway. I mostly use VSTs, but I do like real keyboards for some stuff.
That was a great review.
I feel that Roland missed the mark on this one by not including 2 LFO's and making the second one assignable to any of the OSCs with controls.
Oh, you have Falco in there?!
5 ads on one video?
4 layers of Jp-8 sound on the X,that are 2 Jp-8 second hand of 16000 euro today:-)
LOL, don't kid yourself you're getting even ONE real jupiter 8 sound let alone 2. This piece of shit is already out-classed by softsynths (inc rolands own VST Jupiter 8 which uses ACB which his superior to Jupiter X's PCM engine.. but still poor vs real analog like Korg Prologue 16 or Ob-6)
Boring synth. Why would you want this?
Crowmoor78 Cause I want it you’ve got a problem?
Because it sounds amazing, gives you the same control as the old synths but many of them, and it’s set up for live performance, and it looks cool as hell, and it’s styled for use and not menu diving.
@@joechristopher5803 It sounds NOTHING like "the old synths", get your ears checked. You're the sheep that keep Roland doing this scam stuff to people over and over. Jupiter X sounds like SHIT, even for digital, and certainly sounds and reacts nothing like real analog. Korg got it right with the Prologue 16 and the genuine VCOs/real analog filter. OB-6 also hands jupiter X it's ass on a plate for sound. Only morons will buy this Jupiter x cos it's dressed up to look like a really shitty/fisher price version of the real thing but sounds NOTHING like it. LOL. Carry on.. mugs!
Boring fking digital instrument 🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱
Joe Christopher amazing? Lol dude are you new on synths 😂😂😂😂
I still don’t love the I arp. It’s not a particular sound I like… I never use it on mine.. most of the rhythms I can’t imagine in any genre. The updates still haven’t made it easy to just rock all the OG arp types.
We love what you guys are doing! But for F***’s sake wear protective masks...we still want to see you doing these demos in the future....food for thought guys! Anderton’s ROCK so do the world’s favorite queen right and follow her advice.
MAD SYNTH SCIENTISTS for fuck’s sake, stop living your life in fear.
Omg, you really are scared of coronabollocks?
Nice video, nice demo, but, it’s actually not a workstation!
The moment I decided to buy this was when he said it has a Jupiter 8 engine. Took 2 days to pull the trigger, but yep. Sweetwater, here I come.
Yeah.
But if it was a sandwich, what sort of sandwich would it be?
A Dagwood, because it's so d*mn big with so many layers
Shit Sandwich
please wash your hands guys
Cooper Pitts Pre-Covid-19.
NATE DOGG HAD TO REGULATE
Bailed on this after 5 minutes. Jack is the most obnoxious, annoying presenter/host ever. I couldn't take his idiotic comments and behavior anymore. I'll go watch a competitor's video instead.
Crikey, really am sorry I came off that way on here. I can totally see why you say that. Sometimes my "over excitement" definitely gets the better of me and I should just keep my mouth shut, hate when I watch these back and I see myself jumping in like an impatient Puppy!! Been trying to work on it but clearly need to dial "it" back some more, thanks for letting us know and taking the time to leave the feedback. Apologies again Sir and fingers crossed next time you stumble across a video I won't come across as such a "Helmet"! X
Jack Duxbury Not your fault Jack be you and do you!!! That’s why people subscribe to your Chanel for. I would have done the same....I mean come on......it’s a Roland Jupiter-X! They’re just haters Jack! Rooting for ya!
Bye Scott. No one cares.
@@jackduxbury1632 Cool that you are aware of it, sometimes it is too much, and does not seem like a genuine reaction. Circuit heating emulation is a really nice touch and attention to details, but it is not a world changing thing to lose your head about it. You can emulate pretty much anything these days if you are willing to spend some time.
Not talking about those goofy reactions after you play, keep them, they are actually cool. Just that kind off non genuine excitement.
@@aleksandari.7834 He always comes across like he's trying to SELL you stuff based on his enthusiasm, I'm not trusting it at all. And yeah, obnoxious as hell.
This sounds absolutely TERRIBLE. It's nothing like analog at all. Don't care what Roland pretend they want "Jupiter" to be about, it's clear they are cashing in again on a legacy that was earned on analog TONE not original concept. Just sounds so fake, flat and plastic. FGS people get REAL analog... if you can't stretch to an OB-6 (gorgeous sound - best sound on the market currently), then a Korg Prologue 16 voice VCO is stunning, and cheaper than this digital mess! Korg deserves your support. The Prologue sounds amazing and can still do weird/digital stuff at times too... this JP-X is for fools who just want something that looks like a Jupiter 8 regardless of how bad it sounds. Prologue can actually SOUND like A jupiter 8, this can't!
Again stop pushing this nonsense on every video. Korg have obviously bought you out. Prologue is a failed board. Both in native features and versatility. It was so, in order to maintain its pricepoint. If it wasn't for a few minute details it would be surpassed by the XD version of its little brother for heavens sake. It is overpriced junk. The OB is a different board aimed at a different group comparatively. Would be like me taking the Novation boards and benching them next to the outdated Kronos. Rather pointless. We get it, you are a brainless Korg shill. Now fuck of elsewhere and take your Korg crap with you.
Adverts ruined this video