Just a reminder...no king or God will save us we have to do it ourselves...workers and all citizens of the world unite...if it's going to be its up to me...Enjoy May day all. G'day from Australia 🇦🇺.
I am definitely reminded about why this was one of the most popular political tunes ever written. It's definitely quite touching. Not one doubt about that... Good job on putting this one together!
Pro Master you should see this next Gen Z Americans, so many are turning communist. I live in a very conservative town, yet I have people at my school making a labor club to teach others how to unionize.
@@clockworkcrew8012 it would be funny to see that the country that tried to stop the working class movements during the XX century become the center of them in the XXI. I would like to see that.
Greatings from China, comrades!🇨🇳 Now this country has corrupted by capitalism, workers are struggling for living... But I believe history will show us the right road... L’Internationale Sera le genre humain!✊✊
Rather Communards.It was written by Eugene Pottier a government member of highly democratic Paris Commune.It has very little in common with soviet marxism-leninism.
@@pawelpawel8892 They were inspired by Marx. Leninism didn't exist as a philosophy at that point and at any rare Leninism being dictatorial would have been incompatible.
Martin Putt I‘m sorry but marx wasn‘t really popular at that time, probably they were inspired by the philosophy of communism wich has came to france during the french revolution.
Imbecile ,vas alors en coree du nord ou en chine .Ce sont les deux endroits qu il te reste ou le socialo-marxisme sera partout et toujours un niveau de vie plus bas .FUCK ALL THE COMMUNIST !
I wish I could find a recording of Paul Robeson singing this. He must have recorded it at some time. This version has a lot going for it, six verses, M Ogeret's spirited singing voice, and in French by a French speaker.
Ah, I only knew the first two stanzas. Great job with the timing, the lyrics and the good translations. I also liked that you chose not to put pictures and even numbered the stanzas! I like the song a lot.
How amazing ?John Lennon's "Imagine " lyric have resemblance in spirit with this song: ...and the world will be as one ............vs.........and tomorrow the internationale will be the human race--
The paradox is that in spite of being international the words are quite different in all languages. This is the French version translated into English but it is not the English version. There is also an American version different to the English.
@@anav.r.2532 In capitalism you can essentially buy political influence, and the rich get by far the most say in what laws get passed, what wars are declared, etc. Represent Us has a good video summing up a study that princeton did on this: ruclips.net/video/5tu32CCA_Ig/видео.html Another thing capitalism doesn't have is democracy in the workplace, obviously the way it works is that the capitalist acts as a sort of dictator of whatever goes on in the workplace and the only way workers can defend themselves from that tyranny is through unions. So, there is such a thing as economic democracy. Democracy under capitalism is much more similar to an oligarchy than to a true democracy.
@@anav.r.2532 Capitalism is antithetical and fundamentally corrosive to democracy. One person one vote is not compatible with one dollar one vote. Political freedom is nothing without economic freedom, and no one is free whose access to food, water, shelter, and medical care for themselves and their loved ones is controlled by another. Socialism is merely democracy expanded to the economic sphere. Just as all citizens have a stake in the management of government, so to do they have a stake in the management of the means of production.
@@jeremiahreagan6596 It is true that capitalism has flaws, but wish economic system doesn't. The point is that communism is not the solution. (and that is coming from someone who lived in a communist country). For in communism all the power resides in the State, wish is supposed to be democratically chosen. But what happens then? The government gets to tell the people what to do and order them around. And since all the power resides in hands of very few, who is there to contradict? The problem is that socialism/communism only works in a perfect world, where all humans are nice and honest. But that is, and shall probably never be our world, so to keep a certain balance between the power of the state and the people there is no other solution but giving the people economic power. So the people hold the money and the State holds the laws. Not gonna lie, it is true that many rich people built their empires by making their goods in countries like China or Sri Lanka where people bearly get paid caus their device keeps getting devalued. But there again, ain't those countries communist? And hasn't china committed many crimes against human rights? Tiananmen Square, sound familiar? Or why would Hongkong protesters fight so hard not to morph with mainland China? Caus they know, once they morph, that they will no longer have a right or vote. Sure capitalism is not and has never been, perfect. But wish is one of the freest countries in the world? Right, the most capitalist one, the USA. And then you might talk about the Nordics but lest remember that all their peace and well being was built on capitalism. Capitalism might learn from socialism, so to create health care and free or cheaper school fees. That is what the French, the Canadians and the Nordics have been doing. Even Russia turned capitalist! So yeah, capitalism is flawed but it is the best we've got! (Sory if this was too long but I had to defend my point)
@@masterofreality2384 A workplace is different from the government. The point of a government is to represent each part of the country so they can state what's better for each, province, state, or territory in a country. A workplace is where the person gets paid to offer services. I kind of see what you mean but there again, let's say that you work for a clothing company, the designer might say that he wants the most expensive silk for his clothing but the economist says that the company might go bankrupt because of that. If the economist was the leader he would buy the cheapest, if the designer was the leader, he would buy the priciest and it is up to the boss to make the final choice. And then you have those that make the dress. The dressmaker doesn't know or need to know the argument over the economist and the designer caus his/her job it's to sew. To them it would be the same if it's cheap or high quality, they just need to sew. Plus if someone creates a company, they have pretty much the right to do what they want with it. So, if they want to sell a factory, even tho people might lose their jobs, they have the right to do it cause it's theirs. On the other hand a government it's the owner of nothing, all the people of a country are entitled to the same rights over the land they live on. That's why every law project get's voted. There are flaws in a capitalist government, of course, but is better than getting your rights violated as they did in China, Cuba or Venezuela.
@xRHYDDERCHx Le plaisir est le mien. O prazer é meu. El gusto es mio. Удовольствие мое! And thanks for the comment. THE PEOPLE UNITED WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED!
To address your dilemma in the description I can assure you as a native French speaker that it’s « l’éruption de la fin » and not « de la faim ». One wouldn’t be able to tell the difference by ear as those two words are supposed to be pronounced the exact same way but « faim » is used as an earlier rhyme so it wouldn’t make sense to use it again.
Bien plus que des chansons comme La Marseillaise, cette chanson me touche, d'abord parce que la musique est réellement bien écrite à mon sens, ensuite parce qu'elle parle d'un idéal que j'approuve, même si je le pense irréalisable. (Donc non, je ne suis ni communiste, ni pour le communisme, mais je ne suis pas vraiment contre non plus.) Far more than songs like "La Marseillaise", the french anthem, this song touches me at the bottom of my heart, first because of its music which I find really good written and played, and second because it expresses an ideal that I totally agree with, although I don't think it is, has been or will ever be achievable. (And I'm no communist, nor am I for communism, and nor am I against it either.)
Les sociétés apatrides ont existé auparavant comme dans ce qu'on appelle le communisme primitif dans les sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs. Vous pensez que c'est idiot parce que vous êtes tellement habitué au système capitaliste et à la société de classe. Marx et Engels ont fortement critiqué l'utopisme et ont fait du socialisme scientifique ou du marxisme. Le marxisme est en effet scientifique et enraciné dans la réalité matérielle, comme la croyance que la matière détermine la conscience plutôt que la conscience déterminant la matière ou l'existence. Le matérialisme dialectique marxiste peut être appliqué à la société dans son ensemble ou même à la nature. Il reconnaît que la société est pleine de contradictions inhérentes. Le communisme n'est pas le rêve de quelqu'un qui se concrétise, c'est l'étape historique inévitable et le résultat de la résolution des antagonismes de classe et des conflits au sein de la société, vous ne le comprenez pas, si vous êtes né au Vietnam par exemple, vous le feriez probablement parce qu'ils vous enseigner le matérialisme dialectique et le marxisme-léninisme de la maternelle au secondaire. Vous voyez, l'État n'existe qu'à la suite d'antagonismes et de conflits de classes et sert la classe qui détient le pouvoir politique, sous le capitalisme, la dictature de la bourgeoisie, la classe bourgeoise le font, sous le socialisme, la dictature du prolétariat (classe ouvrière), font les ouvriers. Toute société de classe est dictature, le capitalisme est la dictature de la bourgeoisie, le socialisme est la dictature du prolétariat. Pas des dictatures au sens libéral absolu, mais des dictatures de classe. La classe qui détient le pouvoir politique sert ses intérêts et réprime les classes opposées, c'est Staline qui l'a le mieux expliqué: « D'où les trois principaux aspects de la dictature du prolétariat. 1) L'utilisation de la domination du prolétariat pour la suppression des exploiteurs, pour la défense du pays, pour la consolidation des liens avec les prolétaires des autres pays, et pour le développement et la victoire de la révolution dans tous les pays. 2) L'utilisation de la domination du prolétariat pour détacher une fois pour toutes les masses laborieuses et exploitées de la bourgeoisie, pour consolider l'alliance du prolétariat avec ces masses, pour entraîner ces masses dans l'œuvre de construction socialiste, et assurer la direction étatique de ces masses par le prolétariat. 3) L'utilisation de la domination du prolétariat pour l'organisation du socialisme, pour l'abolition des classes, pour le passage à une société sans classes, à une société socialiste. La dictature prolétarienne est une combinaison de ces trois aspects. Aucun de ces aspects ne peut être avancé comme le seul trait caractéristique de la dictature du prolétariat. D'autre part, dans les circonstances de l'encerclement capitaliste, l'absence d'un seul de ces traits suffit pour que la dictature du prolétariat cesse d'être une dictature. Par conséquent, aucun de ces trois aspects ne peut être omis sans courir le risque de déformer le concept de la dictature du prolétariat. Seuls ces trois aspects pris ensemble nous donnent le concept complet et fini de la dictature du prolétariat.
@ThysaniaAg Thank you. As I said, I posted this as a public service - and I believe the people deserve my best effort. The whole song is incredible from the first to last. I admit my favorite is that line about our bullets are for our own generals. It's really too bad that there aren't more recordings of the whole song.
@Kian22 Don't you know that china got tens of millions of Muslims who love their country and are thankful for the communist revolution that drastically improved their living conditions?
I think all people of goodwill everywhere share the same dream. In fact, I use that John Lennon quote in my International Women's Day Video this year, with L'Internationale p;laying in the background. I will post the link to that in the description here.
I have been thinking all night about the problem of what to do with that enormous military. How about a military coup to overthrow the current fascist regime? The North Korean army is huge. Without them being on the side of the nearly weaponless revolutionaries...well, the army could just kill them.
@allal231 I feel it in my blood. I will be 60 next year and I have never felt it as close as it is right now. This is the first truly worldwide workers movement I have seen, possibly the first ever.
we lost everthing when we live in this world, we get nothing when we shill die, now I want to fight against unfair to get something to buy my coffin before I am dying
Vesa Palomaa the problem this song will make you equal with the bataclan terrorists,and they will say the victims are the terrorists because they were oppressed and the government didn’t let them to practice their sharia law,,,but I will tell something the next fight will be between the Islamists and the liberals communist,,
We are always looking to improve our work. If you'd like to supply a better translation, we would be delighted to put it in the description along with annotations pointing to it. Anyway, what we have is much, much better than the usual Billy Bragg interpretation.
I have changed my profile picture/avatar. I hope you like it. I wish the outcome were differrent, but we'll keep om keepin', as always. We're a hard bunch to discourage for long.
Indeed. Although the only time this was an official national anthem was during the Lenin era of the Soviet Union, and the early part of Stalin's leadership. I've listened to the Soviet Russian version of this, and while I do agree that one was quite harmonic, and I'm assuming that was the Red Army Choir that sang that one, I still feel this version is still best.
It's because, sadly, Stalin destroyed all that Lenin worked for. Tho he did prove communism wouldn't work because of people like him. Even Lenin regretted putting giving Russia's future to him. Stalin literally ruined communism for the Russians. But welp. That was a long time ago.
@@anav.r.2532 He didn't prove that communism didn't work and he didn't ruin anything. He greatly transformed the Soviet Union and his leadership helped win the Great Patriotic War.
@@anav.r.2532 Communism involves a stateless, classless, moneyless society with the means of production held in common, a lack of commodity production which refers to producing things to be sold, a gift economy, "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" as Marx had worded it, the "withering away of state" as Engels had worded, to achieve a "Communist-Society" as Marx had called it. The nations which you most likely refer to as "Communist" are/were only Socialist and thus merely in the transitory stage between Capitalism and Communism. Socialism has done many good things improved literacy, education, healthcare, rights for minorities, rights for women, standards of living, qualities of life, caloric intake, lifespan, etc. They have also turned feudal backwaters into economic superpowers such as in the Soviet Union's case. According to a study called "Capitalism, Socialism and the Physical Quality of Life" by H. Waitzkin and S. Cereseto PhD published by the World Bank, given equal levels of economic development, Socialist nations had higher standards of living than Capitalist nations, also according to that same study, given equal levels of economic development, Socialist nations had higher levels of caloric intake than Capitalist ones, meaning contrary to popular belief, people in Socialist nations actually ate more food. That study can be found on various .gov and .org sites and has PDFs for you to download, if you want to read it. All of this information can be found from various other sources as well, physical and digital. Socialism had also turns nations into military superpowers such as in the Soviet Union's case. Planned economies are actually proven to be more efficient than markets such as in the case of Project CyberSyn where they used a computer planned economy, this was decades ago in Chile, think about what modern computers with modern computing capabilities could do! The reason for some Socialist nations having bad economies is NOT a fault of Socialism, it is often caused by economic embargoes, sanctions and other methods of destabilizing their economies caused by the United States, or the loss of some of the nations' biggest trade partners such as the DPRK(North Korea)'s economy ranking after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
That could easily be interpreted as the capitalist bourgeoisie state. I mean, even Marx himself envisioned true communism to be a classless, moneyless, and a stateless society of equals where people would live under the principles of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". In fact, Friedrich Engels talked about socialism where the workers and people in general would be so much in control that the state would basically "wither away". Not even abolished, but it just wouldn't make sense for it to exist, so it stops existing.
@@moskaumaster947 Leninism, though it has its shortcomings, was the best adapted for tsarist Russia's material conditions. It is true that the party holding the state in a trust for the workers is just begging to create two new classes : party and people, but there really was no other option. You couldn't have given control of the state straight away directly to the peasants, who were not class conscious, who could have reverted instantly to capitalism just because that is the only thing they knew. If Leninism was indeed adapted to the Revolution and the Civil War, I agree that it should later have been modified into a better suited ideology for the material conditions, such as council communism or a hybrid of both.
Workers of the world, unite! We have nothing to lose but our chains!
One thing we have to loose those f***ing capitalist
@@sayanchatterjee8622 indeed comrade
And your freedom
Id recommend going to china Venezuela or north Korea and criticize the government
@@someguysburner5593 china and dprk isn't a communist country.....they used communism to make a facist state.
They are Stalin's communist...we hate it
Greeting from Tunisia ❤
Long live the revolution comrades 💪
Wenk rfi9i hhh ? ❤️
Just a reminder...no king or God will save us we have to do it ourselves...workers and all citizens of the world unite...if it's going to be its up to me...Enjoy May day all. G'day from Australia 🇦🇺.
I am definitely reminded about why this was one of the most popular political tunes ever written. It's definitely quite touching. Not one doubt about that... Good job on putting this one together!
Let us decree the common salvation of each other! Greetings from America, comrades.
I hope one day there will be more people like you in the united states. Currently it is full of dumb people.
Pro Master you should see this next Gen Z Americans, so many are turning communist. I live in a very conservative town, yet I have people at my school making a labor club to teach others how to unionize.
@@clockworkcrew8012 it would be funny to see that the country that tried to stop the working class movements during the XX century become the center of them in the XXI. I would like to see that.
@@promaster4758 exactly it sucks.
Greetings from Brazil comrades✊✊🇧🇷🇨🇳🇨🇺🇫🇷
Choooooora , esqueeerdaaaaaaaa
Greatings from China, comrades!🇨🇳
Now this country has corrupted by capitalism, workers are struggling for living...
But I believe history will show us the right road...
L’Internationale
Sera le genre humain!✊✊
Because Cuba is doing so well that there people risk thier life’s just to escape such a glorious nation
Hey, me too!
@@_zoix4137 REVIVE MAO
salut vive la France
Liberte Fraternite Egalite
Greetings from germany Comrades ;)
Rather Communards.It was written by Eugene Pottier a government member of highly democratic Paris Commune.It has very little in common with soviet marxism-leninism.
@@pawelpawel8892 They were inspired by Marx. Leninism didn't exist as a philosophy at that point and at any rare Leninism being dictatorial would have been incompatible.
Martin Putt I‘m sorry but marx wasn‘t really popular at that time, probably they were inspired by the philosophy of communism wich has came to france during the french revolution.
@@kimon3007 Wrong. Marx was massively popular in France at the time.
Imbecile ,vas alors en coree du nord ou en chine .Ce sont les deux endroits qu il
te reste ou le socialo-marxisme sera partout et toujours un niveau de vie plus bas .FUCK ALL THE COMMUNIST !
I wish I could find a recording of Paul Robeson singing this. He must have recorded it at some time.
This version has a lot going for it, six verses, M Ogeret's spirited singing voice, and in French by a French speaker.
Solidarity to everyone in the world from Mexico, the people, together, will never be defeated!
El pueblo unido nunca será vencido. Boricua aquí
The origanal that started it all
My very great honour and pleasure. HAPPY INTERNATIONAL WORKER'S DAY!
One of the few french songs i honestly repsect with all my heart, love from allemagne and vive la commune
Bruh
go to hell leftist nazi
Workers of the world, unite.
Mr ogeret la révolution approche vous êtes un grand homme merci
Ah, I only knew the first two stanzas. Great job with the timing, the lyrics and the good translations. I also liked that you chose not to put pictures and even numbered the stanzas! I like the song a lot.
Rompons (4:23) les rangs (let's break), not "rampons" (let's crawl). Nos propres généraux (4:38), not "notre propre...".
2:22 « aux riches » or « au riche » but not « aux riche »
4:32 « À » and not « Á »
5:31 « les corbeaux, les vautours » would be more aptly translated as “the ravens, the vultures”
5:36 About 97% sure that « Le Soleil brillera toujours » should mean something more in the lines of “The sun will still shine”
Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes. Mais oui!
Greetings from Montenegro Comrades ;)
Thanks for the lyrics!!! Happy International Workers's Day!!!
Happy Workers Day Comrades !
Best wishes from Portugal
Cool name
portuguese here
1871 la France
1974 o Portugal
VİVE LA COMMUNE DE PARİS !
Combattons pour l'avenir camarades !
HOURRA !
How amazing ?John Lennon's "Imagine " lyric have resemblance in spirit with this song: ...and the world will be as one ............vs.........and tomorrow the internationale will be the human race--
John Lenin
Carry on regardless comrades G'day from Australia 😂 🇦🇺.
Thank You!!! This is a really stirring version of this fabulous song! And Happy May Day!
The only national anthem worth singing: the rallying cry of the international working class.
i agree comrade
Not a national anthem. It's an International anthem. It should be declared as the anthem of Humanity.
Besides the Soviet Union and other socialist experiments
@@sagnikganguly4651 it would be so cool if this was the un anthem
Greetings to the proletariat of the world from Chile 🇨🇱❤️ El pueblo unido jamás será vencido ❤️🇨🇱
¡Agrupémonos todos en la lucha final!
Esto fue ase 6 años
Tis the final conflict
Marc Ogeret, merci.
best version of international i think. comes from birth place.
workers of the world ,unite!
Happy international workers day!
Proletariats from all the land, untied ourselves! Proletariat aller Länder, vereinigt euch!
Marc ogeret un grand homme merci
Happy Workers Day Comrades. Best Wishes from Indian's 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Comrade that is the Nigerien flag, this is the Indian flag 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@@shambosaha9727 thankyou Comrade for helping me to detect my mistake
@@Taurus388 Well, no. It isn't a failed ideology. It just needs to be tried to be implemented in a different manner.
Thank you! My very great pleasure. I especially like the way he sings like he really means it.
Il a une belle voix le monsieur.
The paradox is that in spite of being international the words are quite different in all languages. This is the French version translated into English but it is not the English version. There is also an American version different to the English.
they share common purpose, its called universality
different words, same idea. Universitality in its purest form! L.’.E.’.F.’.
HAPPY MAY DAY TO ALL THE 99%
Workers are we all.
20165
Thank you. I am honoured.
Most welcome! And HAPPY INTERNATIONAL WORKERS DAY to you, too! Maybe by next year, the sun will shine forever.
"Maybe by next year, the sun will shine forever." The only thing a proletarian worker has to look forward to is revolution! worldwide and everlasting!
Vive la Commune de Paris, c'est la lutte finale , groupons-nous et demain l'internationale sera le genre humain !
Down with capitalism, up with democracy! Get rid of the burden of the capital and the wage system! ☭
You know that capitalism is an economic system and it has nothing to do with democracy which is apolitic system right?
@@anav.r.2532 In capitalism you can essentially buy political influence, and the rich get by far the most say in what laws get passed, what wars are declared, etc. Represent Us has a good video summing up a study that princeton did on this:
ruclips.net/video/5tu32CCA_Ig/видео.html
Another thing capitalism doesn't have is democracy in the workplace, obviously the way it works is that the capitalist acts as a sort of dictator of whatever goes on in the workplace and the only way workers can defend themselves from that tyranny is through unions. So, there is such a thing as economic democracy. Democracy under capitalism is much more similar to an oligarchy than to a true democracy.
@@anav.r.2532
Capitalism is antithetical and fundamentally corrosive to democracy. One person one vote is not compatible with one dollar one vote. Political freedom is nothing without economic freedom, and no one is free whose access to food, water, shelter, and medical care for themselves and their loved ones is controlled by another. Socialism is merely democracy expanded to the economic sphere. Just as all citizens have a stake in the management of government, so to do they have a stake in the management of the means of production.
@@jeremiahreagan6596 It is true that capitalism has flaws, but wish economic system doesn't. The point is that communism is not the solution. (and that is coming from someone who lived in a communist country). For in communism all the power resides in the State, wish is supposed to be democratically chosen. But what happens then? The government gets to tell the people what to do and order them around. And since all the power resides in hands of very few, who is there to contradict? The problem is that socialism/communism only works in a perfect world, where all humans are nice and honest. But that is, and shall probably never be our world, so to keep a certain balance between the power of the state and the people there is no other solution but giving the people economic power. So the people hold the money and the State holds the laws. Not gonna lie, it is true that many rich people built their empires by making their goods in countries like China or Sri Lanka where people bearly get paid caus their device keeps getting devalued. But there again, ain't those countries communist? And hasn't china committed many crimes against human rights? Tiananmen Square, sound familiar? Or why would Hongkong protesters fight so hard not to morph with mainland China? Caus they know, once they morph, that they will no longer have a right or vote. Sure capitalism is not and has never been, perfect. But wish is one of the freest countries in the world? Right, the most capitalist one, the USA. And then you might talk about the Nordics but lest remember that all their peace and well being was built on capitalism. Capitalism might learn from socialism, so to create health care and free or cheaper school fees. That is what the French, the Canadians and the Nordics have been doing. Even Russia turned capitalist! So yeah, capitalism is flawed but it is the best we've got! (Sory if this was too long but I had to defend my point)
@@masterofreality2384 A workplace is different from the government. The point of a government is to represent each part of the country so they can state what's better for each, province, state, or territory in a country. A workplace is where the person gets paid to offer services. I kind of see what you mean but there again, let's say that you work for a clothing company, the designer might say that he wants the most expensive silk for his clothing but the economist says that the company might go bankrupt because of that. If the economist was the leader he would buy the cheapest, if the designer was the leader, he would buy the priciest and it is up to the boss to make the final choice. And then you have those that make the dress. The dressmaker doesn't know or need to know the argument over the economist and the designer caus his/her job it's to sew. To them it would be the same if it's cheap or high quality, they just need to sew. Plus if someone creates a company, they have pretty much the right to do what they want with it. So, if they want to sell a factory, even tho people might lose their jobs, they have the right to do it cause it's theirs. On the other hand a government it's the owner of nothing, all the people of a country are entitled to the same rights over the land they live on. That's why every law project get's voted. There are flaws in a capitalist government, of course, but is better than getting your rights violated as they did in China, Cuba or Venezuela.
Magnifique !
+Slevin91120 Go raibh maith agat and merci beaucoup!
I need an instrumental of this, I swear
I love the background music so much
Continuons de nous battre camarades !!
L'humain d'abord !!!
Onward and upward! Comrades always!
I'm not a socialist/communist at all but I love this song!
@xRHYDDERCHx Le plaisir est le mien. O prazer é meu. El gusto es mio. Удовольствие мое!
And thanks for the comment.
THE PEOPLE UNITED
WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED!
To address your dilemma in the description I can assure you as a native French speaker that it’s « l’éruption de la fin » and not « de la faim ». One wouldn’t be able to tell the difference by ear as those two words are supposed to be pronounced the exact same way but « faim » is used as an earlier rhyme so it wouldn’t make sense to use it again.
Prolétaires de tous les pays, unissez vous!
Bien plus que des chansons comme La Marseillaise, cette chanson me touche, d'abord parce que la musique est réellement bien écrite à mon sens, ensuite parce qu'elle parle d'un idéal que j'approuve, même si je le pense irréalisable. (Donc non, je ne suis ni communiste, ni pour le communisme, mais je ne suis pas vraiment contre non plus.)
Far more than songs like "La Marseillaise", the french anthem, this song touches me at the bottom of my heart, first because of its music which I find really good written and played, and second because it expresses an ideal that I totally agree with, although I don't think it is, has been or will ever be achievable. (And I'm no communist, nor am I for communism, and nor am I against it either.)
J'ai aimé comme t'as penséa traduire ton commentaire. Tres astusieu
Les sociétés apatrides ont existé auparavant comme dans ce qu'on appelle le communisme primitif dans les sociétés de chasseurs-cueilleurs. Vous pensez que c'est idiot parce que vous êtes tellement habitué au système capitaliste et à la société de classe. Marx et Engels ont fortement critiqué l'utopisme et ont fait du socialisme scientifique ou du marxisme. Le marxisme est en effet scientifique et enraciné dans la réalité matérielle, comme la croyance que la matière détermine la conscience plutôt que la conscience déterminant la matière ou l'existence. Le matérialisme dialectique marxiste peut être appliqué à la société dans son ensemble ou même à la nature. Il reconnaît que la société est pleine de contradictions inhérentes. Le communisme n'est pas le rêve de quelqu'un qui se concrétise, c'est l'étape historique inévitable et le résultat de la résolution des antagonismes de classe et des conflits au sein de la société, vous ne le comprenez pas, si vous êtes né au Vietnam par exemple, vous le feriez probablement parce qu'ils vous enseigner le matérialisme dialectique et le marxisme-léninisme de la maternelle au secondaire. Vous voyez, l'État n'existe qu'à la suite d'antagonismes et de conflits de classes et sert la classe qui détient le pouvoir politique, sous le capitalisme, la dictature de la bourgeoisie, la classe bourgeoise le font, sous le socialisme, la dictature du prolétariat (classe ouvrière), font les ouvriers. Toute société de classe est dictature, le capitalisme est la dictature de la bourgeoisie, le socialisme est la dictature du prolétariat. Pas des dictatures au sens libéral absolu, mais des dictatures de classe. La classe qui détient le pouvoir politique sert ses intérêts et réprime les classes opposées, c'est Staline qui l'a le mieux expliqué: « D'où les trois principaux aspects de la dictature du prolétariat.
1) L'utilisation de la domination du prolétariat pour la suppression des exploiteurs, pour la défense du pays, pour la consolidation des liens avec les prolétaires des autres pays, et pour le développement et la victoire de la révolution dans tous les pays.
2) L'utilisation de la domination du prolétariat pour détacher une fois pour toutes les masses laborieuses et exploitées de la bourgeoisie, pour consolider l'alliance du prolétariat avec ces masses, pour entraîner ces masses dans l'œuvre de construction socialiste, et assurer la direction étatique de ces masses par le prolétariat.
3) L'utilisation de la domination du prolétariat pour l'organisation du socialisme, pour l'abolition des classes, pour le passage à une société sans classes, à une société socialiste.
La dictature prolétarienne est une combinaison de ces trois aspects. Aucun de ces aspects ne peut être avancé comme le seul trait caractéristique de la dictature du prolétariat. D'autre part, dans les circonstances de l'encerclement capitaliste, l'absence d'un seul de ces traits suffit pour que la dictature du prolétariat cesse d'être une dictature. Par conséquent, aucun de ces trois aspects ne peut être omis sans courir le risque de déformer le concept de la dictature du prolétariat. Seuls ces trois aspects pris ensemble nous donnent le concept complet et fini de la dictature du prolétariat.
hilarious how even this song has now been monetized by youtube ads before it plays...
All the verses!
Happy Workers Day from Britain
Merci !Russia.Moscow.
🇷🇺♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
Thank you.
@ThysaniaAg Thank you. As I said, I posted this as a public service - and I believe the people deserve my best effort.
The whole song is incredible from the first to last. I admit my favorite is that line about our bullets are for our own generals.
It's really too bad that there aren't more recordings of the whole song.
Go forward comrades. G'day. 🇦🇺
never gets old 2023 comment
Happy May Day to all! The fight continues...
“ No duty is imposed on the rich. The rights of the poor is an empty phrase.” President Biden’s 2024 State of the Union Speech.
Greetings from the people’s republic of China! 🇨🇳 Long live the internationale.
@Kian22 yea why?
@Kian22 Don't you know that china got tens of millions of Muslims who love their country and are thankful for the communist revolution that drastically improved their living conditions?
Greetings Chinese comrade. Al Salam alayakum ❤
Happy 1st of May!! :D
Always happy, especially on May1! :D
***** I am currently in the United States of America. I hope soon to be in Canada
@@CandaceSnowbunny Make a revolution there please!
Splendide version la, crisse.
En 68 à Peugeot ça été très dur hommage aux os ils l ont chanté
I think all people of goodwill everywhere share the same dream. In fact, I use that John Lennon quote in my International Women's Day Video this year, with L'Internationale p;laying in the background.
I will post the link to that in the description here.
Long live the Revolution!
Happy May Day 2019!
Génial !
Very good comrade!
Enslaved masses stand up, stand up. ...
Exactly! The North Korean masses should stand up against their crypto-monarchist government and institute communism!
I have been thinking all night about the problem of what to do with that enormous military. How about a military coup to overthrow the current fascist regime? The North Korean army is huge. Without them being on the side of the nearly weaponless revolutionaries...well, the army could just kill them.
*Looks at Venezuela
@@joew.3354 not pure communism
@allal231 I feel it in my blood. I will be 60 next year and I have never felt it as close as it is right now. This is the first truly worldwide workers movement I have seen, possibly the first ever.
we lost everthing when we live in this world, we get nothing when we shill die, now I want to fight against unfair to get something to buy my coffin before I am dying
It's hilarious that this video has ads.
1:20
Mêmes
Communism has memes
i don't speak france..but this sounds good :)viva la france..and never forget batalcan..
Vesa Palomaa the problem this song will make you equal with the bataclan terrorists,and they will say the victims are the terrorists because they were oppressed and the government didn’t let them to practice their sharia law,,,but I will tell something the next fight will be between the Islamists and the liberals communist,,
@@rassulzamel6876 "liberals communist"
Vive la Commune!
Except when they call for new elections in the soviets then the commune becomes a bunch of reactionary counter Revolutionaries right?
Excellent video. This will do very nicely at my cremation...a long way off...I hope!
RIP Marc.
Eat the Rich!
That doesn't sound very healthy. Too much fat.
Just Some Guy Without a Life haha
Thank you !
💗💗💗 this Marc Ogeret version. Thanks for uploading!..The dodgy translation not so much.
We are always looking to improve our work. If you'd like to supply a better translation, we would be delighted to put it in the description along with annotations pointing to it. Anyway, what we have is much, much better than the usual Billy Bragg interpretation.
Please submit a better translation. I will be glad to post it. My French isn't up to doing my own translation.
proletari di tutti i paesi uniamoci !!!
I have changed my profile picture/avatar. I hope you like it. I wish the outcome were differrent, but we'll keep om keepin', as always. We're a hard bunch to discourage for long.
Un hymne dont nous devrions méditer les paroles en ce moment...
Une fois que nous serons réunis vous et nous camarade la planète pourra enfin commencer une nouvelle ère de pas les prolétaires Poutine enfin vivre
Support the protests in France right now! Nous ne sommes rien, soyons tout!!
Good song
The best!
Nous étaions rein, soyons tout.
We should've played this during the Yellow Vest Protests.
Indeed. Although the only time this was an official national anthem was during the Lenin era of the Soviet Union, and the early part of Stalin's leadership. I've listened to the Soviet Russian version of this, and while I do agree that one was quite harmonic, and I'm assuming that was the Red Army Choir that sang that one, I still feel this version is still best.
It's because, sadly, Stalin destroyed all that Lenin worked for. Tho he did prove communism wouldn't work because of people like him. Even Lenin regretted putting giving Russia's future to him. Stalin literally ruined communism for the Russians. But welp. That was a long time ago.
@@anav.r.2532 He didn't prove that communism didn't work and he didn't ruin anything. He greatly transformed the Soviet Union and his leadership helped win the Great Patriotic War.
@@anav.r.2532 Communism involves a stateless, classless, moneyless society with the means of production held in common, a lack of commodity production which refers to producing things to be sold, a gift economy, "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" as Marx had worded it, the "withering away of state" as Engels had worded, to achieve a "Communist-Society" as Marx had called it. The nations which you most likely refer to as "Communist" are/were only Socialist and thus merely in the transitory stage between Capitalism and Communism. Socialism has done many good things improved literacy, education, healthcare, rights for minorities, rights for women, standards of living, qualities of life, caloric intake, lifespan, etc. They have also turned feudal backwaters into economic superpowers such as in the Soviet Union's case. According to a study called "Capitalism, Socialism and the Physical Quality of Life" by H. Waitzkin and S. Cereseto PhD published by the World Bank, given equal levels of economic development, Socialist nations had higher standards of living than Capitalist nations, also according to that same study, given equal levels of economic development, Socialist nations had higher levels of caloric intake than Capitalist ones, meaning contrary to popular belief, people in Socialist nations actually ate more food. That study can be found on various .gov and .org sites and has PDFs for you to download, if you want to read it. All of this information can be found from various other sources as well, physical and digital. Socialism had also turns nations into military superpowers such as in the Soviet Union's case. Planned economies are actually proven to be more efficient than markets such as in the case of Project CyberSyn where they used a computer planned economy, this was decades ago in Chile, think about what modern computers with modern computing capabilities could do! The reason for some Socialist nations having bad economies is NOT a fault of Socialism, it is often caused by economic embargoes, sanctions and other methods of destabilizing their economies caused by the United States, or the loss of some of the nations' biggest trade partners such as the DPRK(North Korea)'s economy ranking after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Greetings from Russia, comrades!
frenchman:neither god nor ceacer.
also frenchman:NAPOLEON is the greatest man during human history.
some guy:which one did you mean?
Bonjour, it's not the same frenchman. :)
Napoléon est le plus grand homme de l'Histoire
Lieblingslied seit meiner Kindheit!
2:15 to many Marxists forget that bit
Long live mother anarchy
Not really
That could easily be interpreted as the capitalist bourgeoisie state. I mean, even Marx himself envisioned true communism to be a classless, moneyless, and a stateless society of equals where people would live under the principles of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". In fact, Friedrich Engels talked about socialism where the workers and people in general would be so much in control that the state would basically "wither away". Not even abolished, but it just wouldn't make sense for it to exist, so it stops existing.
@@adama8389 Yes exactly and Marxists kept sight of that its the offshoot that is Leninism that is a failure
@@moskaumaster947 Leninism, though it has its shortcomings, was the best adapted for tsarist Russia's material conditions. It is true that the party holding the state in a trust for the workers is just begging to create two new classes : party and people, but there really was no other option. You couldn't have given control of the state straight away directly to the peasants, who were not class conscious, who could have reverted instantly to capitalism just because that is the only thing they knew.
If Leninism was indeed adapted to the Revolution and the Civil War, I agree that it should later have been modified into a better suited ideology for the material conditions, such as council communism or a hybrid of both.
Happy May Day!
To all the 99%
graphifc desing is my passion
I'm a member of the "death to the left" school of thought, but this bring back great memories playing Kaiserreich for Darkest Hour
+Patrick Andrzejczyk ANTIFA never sleeps. He has been noted.
+Patrick Andrzejczyk I'm no fascist, but you don't need to be to hate what the communists did, man
あーインターナショナール
Long live the revolution, comrades!
I think it's yet to come.
allons Frères et soeurs, c'est le jour de libération!
经典