Three Point Dolly (No DC Replacement) Craps Simulation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 35

  • @DiceData
    @DiceData  19 дней назад +3

    Three things to note here: (1) I called the seven out too early at 3:55. Timing was off in the edit. Sorry. (2) I should have had it lay the odds right away without the puck needing to be on and (3) I have it programmed to not lay odds if we've lost the come bets ( no replacement). I think it would have been better if I was more consistent - that is, if the DP is made, then the DP odds are also laid.
    But I hope it's still entertaining and informative for you :)

  • @alkayboe652
    @alkayboe652 19 дней назад +4

    Fantastic content. Certainly the most unbiased craps content on the internet. Yep imo you’re up there with Wizard of Odds! Please keep up the good and honest work. Thank you!

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  18 дней назад +2

      It's such a fun game! Just helps to know what you're getting into!

  • @paule.9638
    @paule.9638 19 дней назад +1

    Once again, excellent work!

  • @drdontpassone8164
    @drdontpassone8164 17 дней назад

    truly a claasic vid for any craps player....................... up there with g changs work on you tube

  • @stevenwarmuth3722
    @stevenwarmuth3722 17 дней назад +2

    Can you please do a session with no odds and no replacement ever

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  16 дней назад +2

      👍 it's gonna be a slow grind though:)

  • @Niskiss
    @Niskiss 18 дней назад

    Glad I found this channel. I usually watch Color Up, but with live rolls and 10 shooter sessions, you can only get so much information. Love the histograms! I think I would like to see percentages above all bins from the get-go, though, or maybe a have a y-axis included.

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  17 дней назад

      Excellent idea! Thanks for subscribing :)

  • @MidAtlanticCraps
    @MidAtlanticCraps 18 дней назад

    Great work. Enjoying your videos!

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  18 дней назад +1

      Likewise! Thank you so much!

  • @HankHoshall
    @HankHoshall 19 дней назад

    Thanks again for all your hard work

  • @johnmarston1254
    @johnmarston1254 19 дней назад

    Hate this strategy. Love the video!

  • @TheBillkrauss
    @TheBillkrauss 19 дней назад +1

    Great😅
    so.. one thing i would like to see. What about win goals and stopping when ahead? Sure, if you have to go all the way to 10 shooters, some sessions would have been up, then came back down.
    Can you parse the data to see what a good wingoal and stop looks like?
    Say i buy-in for $600 and want to win 20% or 30%..
    What's that look like?
    BdB

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  18 дней назад +2

      Yes, I have been thinking about this quite a bit. I am thinking to portray it similar to the bankroll ("if the player had stopped when they were up, what would their win be?" but I am open to suggestions.
      It will probably be a few more videos before I can incorporate this, but I will get there eventually :)

  • @drdontpassone8164
    @drdontpassone8164 19 дней назад +1

    superb,,

  • @shantytownbrown
    @shantytownbrown 18 дней назад

    Another great video.
    Would it be worthwhile comparing expected house edge to observed house edge in future strategy simulations? Though with your high “n” I imagine it should really trend toward expected pretty closely.

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  18 дней назад +1

      Yep, that's why I bumped up the numbers - originally I was doing 1,000 or 10,000 but the variation between runs was just too much and it felt misleading. I could have modeled the distribution across 30 or so runs, but it was easier to increase the number of iterations :)
      I always do a check - but I don't always discuss it in the video.

    • @shantytownbrown
      @shantytownbrown 17 дней назад

      Correct my statistical ignorance here, but does variance of a particular strategy equate to or approximate bankroll need/risk of ruin? Just curious.

  • @jeremya7470
    @jeremya7470 11 дней назад

    Can you do the same strategy except only lays so that way the sevens dont knock out the don’ts

  • @Awasdwert
    @Awasdwert 19 дней назад

    Can you run the low and slow brisket strat please?

  • @scottgunerman
    @scottgunerman 18 дней назад

    New subscriber here. So you’re saying if I have 609 bankroll and play 10 shooters on a $15 table, I have 99% to survive, what is your definition of bankroll survival?

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  17 дней назад

      It's the lowest the bankroll went over the ten shooters. So 99% of the simulated players never had a bankroll that fell less than $609 from their original bankroll.

    • @scottgunerman
      @scottgunerman 17 дней назад

      @ hmmm. Ok, so if I had 609 bankroll, played that strategy on a $15 table there is a 99% chance I won’t lose it all? This is confusing to me!

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  17 дней назад

      @@scottgunerman You could interpret it that way, but it's not really "correct" for me to say it that way.
      I can only report on what I observed in the simulation, so it's more like "if you played this strategy 100,000 times, 99,000 times your bankroll would have never fell below $609 from your starting bankroll."

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  17 дней назад +1

      I'm not using any statistical theory to derive the inference. I'm just reporting on what happened when I simulated it.

    • @scottgunerman
      @scottgunerman 17 дней назад

      @@DiceData in the video did u mention the starting bankroll?

  • @CongTran-iv3zu
    @CongTran-iv3zu 19 дней назад +1

    please do with 100x odds.

    • @DiceData
      @DiceData  18 дней назад

      What does 100x odds look like when laying? Is that limit at the amount you could win (so at a $15 table the max win is 100x $1500, so the lay on the 4/10 is 2x that ($3000)?

    • @CongTran-iv3zu
      @CongTran-iv3zu 15 дней назад

      If you $15 table then you can lay 100x it which is $1500. If it’s a 4/10, you only win $750 like a normal lay odds. Max lay will be $1500 for any number.