Don't know if anyone has realised this, but the Churchill vet 3 gives 15% damage reduction which is bizarre for a vehicle. Normally vehicles get flat health buffs that translate well into +1 shots to kill from an AT or tank gun etc. Infantry are normally the ones to get reduction. So it means every tank or AT shell that pens the Churchill does a strange amount of damage, meaning it can probably tank far more damage now over the course of its 1200HP. If only we had a kiwi around to do some testing on this.
@tightropegaming I'd say "shots to kill" is massively important for tanks. For example, in coh2 I think all tank guns did 160 vs tank average hp for 640. So it was 4 shots to kill. In coh 3 most do 120 except for TDs and AT guns which still do 160. This is probably the most fundamental difference in ttk between the 2 games. 4 shots vs 5 or 6 shots is huge for vehicle play. So a churchill being able to tank all kinds of weird damage is basically unprecedented in coh.
Doesn't help when 101st wants to commit to a troll build not helped by even utilising it to its fullest. Hell, you're gonna spam coastals and not even get the officer quarters?
This game is defective at best! 3 pak-40s need 12 shots to kill a churchill tank given that no shot bounces while at the same time most shots bounce.. Hahahhah. CoH 2 is so much superior to this crap.
Don't know if anyone has realised this, but the Churchill vet 3 gives 15% damage reduction which is bizarre for a vehicle. Normally vehicles get flat health buffs that translate well into +1 shots to kill from an AT or tank gun etc. Infantry are normally the ones to get reduction. So it means every tank or AT shell that pens the Churchill does a strange amount of damage, meaning it can probably tank far more damage now over the course of its 1200HP. If only we had a kiwi around to do some testing on this.
Maybe it can take 15% more damage? I don't see what needs analysing. When units get this much health shots to kill becomes less relevant.
@tightropegaming I'd say "shots to kill" is massively important for tanks. For example, in coh2 I think all tank guns did 160 vs tank average hp for 640. So it was 4 shots to kill.
In coh 3 most do 120 except for TDs and AT guns which still do 160. This is probably the most fundamental difference in ttk between the 2 games. 4 shots vs 5 or 6 shots is huge for vehicle play.
So a churchill being able to tank all kinds of weird damage is basically unprecedented in coh.
@@jackobrien47 Not true, the churchill has 1400hp in COH2. 1200 / 0.85 = 1411. So the COH2 one was similar
AT bunker would've helped to zone out those churchills a lot more than ATGs lol
I think even 1 nebel into the mix could be good. Even for denying those VP caps late game.
I really hate the at gun wall play in COH3. I really think there needs to be more rocket arty that can counter that.
Did axis team had any chance to win? It was painful to watch one side dominate this much.
Doesn't help when 101st wants to commit to a troll build not helped by even utilising it to its fullest. Hell, you're gonna spam coastals and not even get the officer quarters?
@@sgtsmith501 or the coastal officer? crazy
No walking stuka, Flak 36 or tigers... didn't see any game-changing units from DAK and the Coastal play was suboptimal too.
Imagine nebel on alied side
5:20
Italian Coastals aren't real
Bad play from axis side. Weh player go full noob coastal style. Meanwhile DAK stick with 2 3 ATG. If he buy 88mm, thing would be differemt.
Wehrmacht -> 101st Italian Airborne -> finaly speaks korean xD :D :D :D xD Kills me
I think he is italian, no true Korean one.
Wow. Really bad play from the axis
This game is defective at best!
3 pak-40s need 12 shots to kill a churchill tank given that no shot bounces while at the same time most shots bounce..
Hahahhah.
CoH 2 is so much superior to this crap.
A churchill has 1200hp in this game, AT gun does 160 damage, that is 8 shots to kill
CoH2 you wouldn't be able to kill a Churchill with a single PaK either.
the churchill is designed to counter the paks... marders are what you want for churches
Thank you for confirming how fact-free the average “CoH2 is better than CoH3” opinion is