you've got to admire their reconstruction, even down to using the same knot, a green handled screwdriver and even making the same bullet pattern, that's some dedication
Biggest difference is definitely in character direction. Older version has a sense of bravado to him. Newer version he is a lot more sinister and mellowed out.
Beautifully accurate tribute, but you just can tell how the rifle in the new one is nothing but a hollow prop, there is absolutely zero weight to it and the closeups just look bad, like a bunch of hardware store PVC piping and a 3D-printed box. The original rifle was fantastic because it was actually a real functioning firearm made for the film.
Main difference is that in the old movie they thought of the elevation of the shooter, so he had to change his rifle's angle, while in the new one he was shoting in a straight line
you've got to admire their reconstruction, even down to using the same knot, a green handled screwdriver and even making the same bullet pattern, that's some dedication
but at the same time... what for?
@@theAristocrap fan service probably
even the number on the cardboard box!
@@HVG67 I missed that one, good eyes
it was done horrible orig is better actor choice made no sense idk
Biggest difference is definitely in character direction. Older version has a sense of bravado to him. Newer version he is a lot more sinister and mellowed out.
my take away from this is that smoking isn't cool any more
Not just that. The original actor has a charm to him even without it. This new one they wanted a more deranged look
@@JustSumGuy01 I rate the new series, I think Redmayne was a good choice
One of the best mini series of 2k24
Beautifully accurate tribute, but you just can tell how the rifle in the new one is nothing but a hollow prop, there is absolutely zero weight to it and the closeups just look bad, like a bunch of hardware store PVC piping and a 3D-printed box.
The original rifle was fantastic because it was actually a real functioning firearm made for the film.
Thats because the new one is a specially made plastic rifle. Thats the whole point of the new one.
The only reason why the original is superior in this scene is the cig in his mouth the whole time. There's a charm to the original
In a real life scenario a cigarette is a giant bullseye on your head
@@oddish3022 Dude is just practicing.
Is this new series any good comparatively?
Eddie Redmayne couldn't carry Edward Fox's jockstrap.
INSANEEE
Why did this need to be redone?
It might not be necessary, but it's just simply cool isn't it?
I'd love to see more versions with different actors.
To sell it a second time
This series was a breath of fresh air among all the mcu dc garbage and all the politically correct tv shows. Enjoyed this through and through
Heavy on the politically correct TV shows part. I agree with you
Cry more maga 😂
왼쪽이 24년도 리메이크인데 왜 제목은 반대로죠?
They should have used Freddy Fox (Edwards son) instead of Eddie
Did this film really need a remake...?
▪absolutely successful reminiscence, even Fred Zinnemann would be thrilled✴
Hollowood has run out of new ideas.
Up next, Gone With The Wind ‘25 starring Vince Vaughn as Rhett Buttler and Tina Fey as Scarlet O’Hara.
Le clin d'œil obligatoire.
Bonne adaptation, en tous cas.
😎👍🏻
Wow. Very creative
Eddie nailed it !
Main difference is that in the old movie they thought of the elevation of the shooter, so he had to change his rifle's angle, while in the new one he was shoting in a straight line
The original is one of my favorite assasin movies the remake with bruce willis was terrible as the new one. Woke garbage.
'woke' in this drama? where is?
Why, in your own words, is it woke garbage?