im waiting on the spin off - JAG: AAFCANS - Harm doesnt fly anymore, doesnt mean he cant trap 5 B&E's before smoko, Mack is dealing with his C2 from doughies in the work ute and Bud is wondering why no one in the SQN is tank entry qualified anymore...
haha now as an airline pilot, seeing these clips from when I was in school, you hear cleared for takeoff - roger understood :D maaaan the right answer ist : Cleared for takeoff - callsign. :D I love it so much nostalgia :)
While it never came to fruition there was a pitched idea for a navy version of the F117 called F117N Complete with twice the payload, arrestor hook, automated landing system and few other goodies. It was pitched in 1993 where this episode was aired in 1998. So writers were not too high when they wrote it ;)
Captain Harmon Rabb JR landed a f-117 stealth fighter and also a C-123 and a C-130 on an aircraft carrier he also Flew an F-14 Tomcat that Transforms into a Gigantic Robot known As The Guardian to Fight Gigantic Aliens Along with Stargate command
Still find it funny that by the time this episode was aired the F-117 was deemed outdated as a stealth aircraft with the B-2 entering service as well as the F-22 being underdevelopment
Why I generally don't watch military shows, except as comic relief. First, the F-117 isn't built to take off from dirt air strips. It borrowed its landing gear and skinny little high pressure tires from the Northrop F-4, and they would blow at the first bump or sharp rock. Second, the F-117 never had a computer that could "automatically" land the plane aboard a carrier. So there is no ACLS or auto-throttle to engage. Third, since the F-117 is not carrier rated, there would be no way to calibrate the optical landing system for the right AOA. Third, that pesky landing gear issue: the F-117 main mounts aren't meant to take the impact of a carrier landing. And, finally, the F-117 doesn't have an arrester hook, so Harm's going into the barrier, probably on his belly after his landing gear collapses.
I loved the show, binge watching it now. In 2 seasons I've seen Harm do high altitude jumps, Seal team insertions, Secret service duty, Marine Force Recon training, under cover Army drill Sargent, rear seat carrier landing, and more.
Now how the heck are you going to land an F-117 on a Aircraft Carrier with out a tail hook or strenthed landing gear? I know you can do it with a C-130 because it has been done, but a Nighthawk.
The '117 has a hook as all USAF fighters do. It's for end of runway cable arrestment if the pilot aborts takeoff or brakes fail on landing (or drag chute doesn't deploy.) Needless to say not intended for carrier use.
@@RobertJones-ux6nc Air Force runways have the emergency cables on both ends of the runway. In a way they're right about not being rated for carrier landings, however they are used in emergency situations so the plane would be damaged no matter what.
Meanwhile in real life, while bombing Yugoslavia: a Harrier jump jet designed to land on a carrier both vertically and using an arrester wire crashes while landing on USS Kearsarge and 2 F-117 get knocked out (1 downed, 1 written-off) with the type retired from combat service 7 years later...
Why is a navy lawyer, flying an air force stealth bomber from a dirt strip, and landing an aircraft without a tail hook on an aircraft carrier. This makes no sense.
I don't remember this episode specifically, but Harm wound up in situations like this once in a while... his Lawyer creds could get him into places, officially, that most others couldn't... then his flying skills would get him out.
Be Advised...The reason you are not aware of a tailhook on the F117 is because it is a Stealth Tailhook, it was never intended to be seen! Now go put that in your pipe and smoke it!!
There was an idea of a Navy version, the F-117N "Seahawk". Also I don't know about the F-117 but most of USAF fighters have a tailhook. It is used in case of an e.g. breaks failure. And some airstrips are equipped with arresting lines.
@@dallasyap3064 A plane is a plane. I think any decent pilot will at least be able to take off anything with wings on it. Landing back safely on the ground would be another thing though.
@@AudieHolland that may be true, but different aircrafts have different systems, functions, weight, size etc. So take off and landing is gonna feel different.
Using an undersized heat sink would let the board overheat and fail. A missing heat sink would fairly quickly cause failure. Anywhere from seconds to a few minutes. Also don't forget the heat conductive paste in between the sink and component.
I remember this show. Enjoyed it. But this bugs bunny chit. F117 is not the plane to land on a deck. I don’t think the landing gear could handle the stress. the . Also, we are talking a tomcat driver switching to a experimental setup that went into the newer f15s. Not saying basic avionics are different. They aren’t. But the computer setup and aircraft does not fly like a f15 or a tomcat. The pilots I know that have flown them compared it to flying a brick on a knife edge.
F-117 does not have a rudder if I'm not mistaken and WTF landing this on a carrier? :D as I kid I was into this, but seeing this when it is such a BS it is hard beyond imagination.
There is no way this would happen. 1st...the F-117 is an Air Force plane...not navy. 2--The plane is so classified, that the Air Force would not even ask the Navy for help...they would send their own men to get it. 3---The F-117 does not have the tail hook to land on an Air Craft Carrier. And it is extremely expensive to retrofit a plane for it....
Yes it's true, u never know they may have a joint exercise, to keep F-117 pilots trained to land on carriers if let's say in future there's emergency and it needs to land on a carrier. For operation uphold democracy, approximately 2,000 soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division were airlifted by Army helicopters, both were stationed aboard a carrier, into Haiti.
@@dallasyap3064 the F117 can’t land on an aircraft carrier. It doesn’t have the structure to support it. The F18 is very similar to the F16 but weights significantly more due to all the reinforcement required to land. No Air Force planes in current use are designed for aircraft carriers. The navy employs specialized planes specifically for this.
@@dallasyap3064 not just the arresting gear. It doesn’t have a reinforced frame like the F18 or Other navy air craft. An F18 weighs about 15k pounds more than an F16 because it has reinforced framing and beefed up landing gear.
Captain's hat says CVN-65. That would be the USS Enterprise not Seahawk. Enterprise was still on active duty. The writers were morons to not realize that they couldn't get away with something like that.
Pretty sure they did that with a few other carriers, too. Seems like they wanted to avoid naming or featuring real carriers. I think they had one named Patrick Henry, too.
Way to Go Skipper, from oldest son of Bobby Bruffett Senior dad,my Ford driving Skipper,🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇳🏁🏁🏁🇺🇳🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🇺🇳🇺🇳🏁🏁🇺🇳🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 John Robert Bruffett Junior 🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Wow that's some real tv 🐎 💩. A fighter pilot turned lawyer and yet the Navy saw fit to train a JAG officer on an Air Force F117. Flying isn't like driving a car where one size fits all.
Take off from a dirt strip and then land on a carrier. Interesting ideas JAG had for the F-117.
It only carries two bombs, you’ve gotta do *something* cool with it! 😎
@@crazyman8472 true
🤣
I grew up with and knew an F-117 pilot. He would laugh.
Wings on the RC model were a little droopy.
"If the heat sink doesnt fry the circuit board" whoever wrote that line, failed computer science class.
I assume they meant undersized heatsink. As in it wasn't up to the task. But yeah.
yeah, those pesky heatsinks, never knew when they would fry a circuit. :)
The show had some writers that I legit thought came straight from even the worst soap operas.
It's cbs bro.
I dont think that they even got to the computer science classes
Best show on tv.
For his next trick, he’s going to land an aircraft carrier on a flat bed truck!
Hahahaha
So was this just a simulation or did he actually?
Being an ex RAAF aircraft tech, this is my go to show when I need some comedy relief. Funny as.
im waiting on the spin off - JAG: AAFCANS - Harm doesnt fly anymore, doesnt mean he cant trap 5 B&E's before smoko, Mack is dealing with his C2 from doughies in the work ute and Bud is wondering why no one in the SQN is tank entry qualified anymore...
haha now as an airline pilot, seeing these clips from when I was in school, you hear cleared for takeoff - roger understood :D maaaan the right answer ist : Cleared for takeoff - callsign. :D I love it so much nostalgia :)
While it never came to fruition there was a pitched idea for a navy version of the F117 called F117N Complete with twice the payload, arrestor hook, automated landing system and few other goodies. It was pitched in 1993 where this episode was aired in 1998. So writers were not too high when they wrote it ;)
Interesting.
Can't say I'm surprised they had the automatics land it. Harm is a Tomcat pilot by trade and the F117's nickname isn't "Wobblin Goblin" for nothing.
Actually...even the F-14's had the auto landing programing as well.
@@kavik2825 really cool I didn't know they could land by themselves
Captain Harmon Rabb JR landed a f-117 stealth fighter and also a C-123 and a C-130 on an aircraft carrier he also Flew an F-14 Tomcat that Transforms into a Gigantic Robot known As The Guardian to Fight Gigantic Aliens Along with Stargate command
With “Harm” *anything is possible*
As odd as it sounds, they HAVE landed a c-130 on an aircraft carrier. It was extensively modified to do it, but it was done.
A former Navy pilot turned lawyer, flying an Air Force aircraft, from a dirt strip to an aircraft carrier... nah, don't think so.
I’ll bet USAF and USN pilots would be jealous as hell.
Still find it funny that by the time this episode was aired the F-117 was deemed outdated as a stealth aircraft with the B-2 entering service as well as the F-22 being underdevelopment
I like how the tail changes configuration after it takes off.
Best one was when he landed a Hercules type plane on a carrier. The jag theme tune in the background gave away who had returned I. NCIS LA
link?
Dont laugh. It actually happened in real life Lt Flatley landed a C-130 Hercules on an aircrft carrier, late 1960 something.
The writers did some serious research for that episode, whilst on crack cocaine.
like how does a heat sync burn a circuit board?
@@mbpaintballa What is a 'heat sync?'
Something the synchronizes heat?
Huh?
@@AudieHolland something that absorbs heat from a component and dissipates it away... Litteraly the exact opposite of a component that can cause harm
@@mbpaintballa Are you sure you didn't mean a 'heatsink?'
@@AudieHolland ahh I see, I accept your ridicule
Why I generally don't watch military shows, except as comic relief. First, the F-117 isn't built to take off from dirt air strips. It borrowed its landing gear and skinny little high pressure tires from the Northrop F-4, and they would blow at the first bump or sharp rock. Second, the F-117 never had a computer that could "automatically" land the plane aboard a carrier. So there is no ACLS or auto-throttle to engage. Third, since the F-117 is not carrier rated, there would be no way to calibrate the optical landing system for the right AOA. Third, that pesky landing gear issue: the F-117 main mounts aren't meant to take the impact of a carrier landing. And, finally, the F-117 doesn't have an arrester hook, so Harm's going into the barrier, probably on his belly after his landing gear collapses.
But it's all good . . . because the CVN-85 doesn't exist, therefore, no crash! :)
The McGyver of the Navy....not even plausible!
The American Hero . . . . . can do anything . . . .what a crock!
I’d say Harm had seen much better times back then. Many JAG lawyers must be envy of him.
The JAGs on JAG literally do almost every single job in the Navy in addition to being JAGs lol
“Harm” could do practically anything a real JAG lawyer would envy.
I loved the show, binge watching it now. In 2 seasons I've seen Harm do high altitude jumps, Seal team insertions, Secret service duty, Marine Force Recon training, under cover Army drill Sargent, rear seat carrier landing, and more.
Found his ability to do anything so absurd I quit the show early on.
I love jag
This is Shadow!, come in shadow! I think I left a shadow in my shorts on this landing !!!!!😂
I loved Jag
I loved season 1. Kat Bell never cut it for me.
@@brucewelty7684breaking news : Catherine Bell saved the show !
Now how the heck are you going to land an F-117 on a Aircraft Carrier with out a tail hook or strenthed landing gear? I know you can do it with a C-130 because it has been done, but a Nighthawk.
The '117 has a hook as all USAF fighters do. It's for end of runway cable arrestment if the pilot aborts takeoff or brakes fail on landing (or drag chute doesn't deploy.) Needless to say not intended for carrier use.
@@Zuloff I did not know this, but still not rated for a Carrier Landing. And the cables on a Carrier are located on the stern not the bow.
It *might* be fiction
@@RobertJones-ux6nc Air Force runways have the emergency cables on both ends of the runway. In a way they're right about not being rated for carrier landings, however they are used in emergency situations so the plane would be damaged no matter what.
@@michiganrailfan2141 new info to me, but then again I was in the Marine Corps.
Jag is magnum pi, a few good men And top gun .
And the movie Airplane!!
Translation: maybe it’s the work of G-d and (or?) the stars.
It doesn’t really lose anything in translation 🤷🏻♀️
Thank you! 🙌🏼 I’ve been wondering what she said since the episode aired back in the late 90’s ☺️ Love that she said that!
Does anyone know if the Keeter who appeared in the Pilot was supposed to be the same the Keeter as in the later episodes?
I Like Jag Television
Miss positive shows like this
Really, most TV shows are woke propaganda.
@@JLee-g6w exactly why ABC dumped 'Last Man Standing'.
@@JLee-g6w Really, most TV shows are low-brow copaganda.
Hopefully it's just a simulation, USAF never let the navy play with their toys.
Did you ever see a USAF pilot ride in F14 or F18?
Only in Bellisario’s imagination is it possible.
Yes I have. USAF pilots flew both planes at Miramar when Top Gun school was located there.
@@clintonnuss9941 why they go to navy top gun, they have their own weapons school?!!
@saadjorio5765 there is always combined training and there was a few Russian planes there also
Yes
Cvn 65 the Seahawk seriously.
It is plausibel there is only one Enterprise with No bloddy A B C or D as Montgomery Scott says once
Rabb has the worst luck. Every time he flies there is a malfunction.
At some point you think the Navy would figure out he is cursed
Meanwhile in real life, while bombing Yugoslavia: a Harrier jump jet designed to land on a carrier both vertically and using an arrester wire crashes while landing on USS Kearsarge and 2 F-117 get knocked out (1 downed, 1 written-off) with the type retired from combat service 7 years later...
You mean bombing my country Serbia 😡😡😡
This is iron Eagle we're on route to your location to Escort you to Battlestar Galactica
No tailhook?
Why is a navy lawyer, flying an air force stealth bomber from a dirt strip, and landing an aircraft without a tail hook on an aircraft carrier. This makes no sense.
I don't remember this episode specifically, but Harm wound up in situations like this once in a while... his Lawyer creds could get him into places, officially, that most others couldn't... then his flying skills would get him out.
Hollywood logic
Welcome to Bellisario’s fantasy world; it has been like that for a *long* time.
not aware f117 had nor be fitted with a tailhook???????
Be Advised...The reason you are not aware of a tailhook on the F117 is because it is a Stealth Tailhook, it was never intended to be seen! Now go put that in your pipe and smoke it!!
There was an idea of a Navy version, the F-117N "Seahawk". Also I don't know about the F-117 but most of USAF fighters have a tailhook. It is used in case of an e.g. breaks failure. And some airstrips are equipped with arresting lines.
They are a one time use hook.
@@finleyivan9439 Guess how much i DON"T CARE!!!!
Is there any plane Harmon Rabb can't fly?
Yes plenty
I believe so. Cuz u can fly one plane doesn't mean u can fly the other planes. There are many different planes in the US military.
@@dallasyap3064 A plane is a plane.
I think any decent pilot will at least be able to take off anything with wings on it.
Landing back safely on the ground would be another thing though.
@@AudieHolland that may be true, but different aircrafts have different systems, functions, weight, size etc. So take off and landing is gonna feel different.
@@ChileMiPais #r/wooosh
how would a heatsync fry a board?
Heat sink; basically an onboard air conditioner preventing the electronics from overheating. 🤖
Using an undersized heat sink would let the board overheat and fail. A missing heat sink would fairly quickly cause failure. Anywhere from seconds to a few minutes. Also don't forget the heat conductive paste in between the sink and component.
There is no arresting gear on that
Tail hook?
F-117s don't have tail hooks. They aren't navy planes.
@@gargouenzene yes, i know... hence how did it happen.... yes Hollywood... unless it can thrust reverse in XX feet
It's not THAT farfetched. Most Air Force birds do have them.
It's a STEALTH tailhook?
Many AF combat planes have non retractable emergency tailhooks.
I remember this show. Enjoyed it. But this bugs bunny chit. F117 is not the plane to land on a deck. I don’t think the landing gear could handle the stress. the . Also, we are talking a tomcat driver switching to a experimental setup that went into the newer f15s. Not saying basic avionics are different. They aren’t. But the computer setup and aircraft does not fly like a f15 or a tomcat. The pilots I know that have flown them compared it to flying a brick on a knife edge.
JAG had a lot of over the top moment but honestly its part of why it was enjoyable.
Everybody knows that when your top test pilots aren't up to the task, the best course is to call one of the lawyers to do it.
It's to bad that I couldn't see full ep
F-117 does not have a rudder if I'm not mistaken and WTF landing this on a carrier? :D as I kid I was into this, but seeing this when it is such a BS it is hard beyond imagination.
When it comes from the same one who gave even “AirWolf” well *anything* is possible in that fantasy.
There is no way this would happen. 1st...the F-117 is an Air Force plane...not navy. 2--The plane is so classified, that the Air Force would not even ask the Navy for help...they would send their own men to get it. 3---The F-117 does not have the tail hook to land on an Air Craft Carrier. And it is extremely expensive to retrofit a plane for it....
There was a proposed naval variant of the F-117, the F-117N.
The real F-117 says bullcrap. I don’t land on boats.
No, Martin-Baker!
A naval aviator in an Air force aircraft...oh 👍 okay
F117 is Air Force and don’t land on Navy ships. This whole thing is far fetched.
That's why it's called a TV show. Just like NCIS.
Yes it's true, u never know they may have a joint exercise, to keep F-117 pilots trained to land on carriers if let's say in future there's emergency and it needs to land on a carrier. For operation uphold democracy, approximately 2,000 soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division were airlifted by Army helicopters, both were stationed aboard a carrier, into Haiti.
@@dallasyap3064 the F117 can’t land on an aircraft carrier. It doesn’t have the structure to support it. The F18 is very similar to the F16 but weights significantly more due to all the reinforcement required to land. No Air Force planes in current use are designed for aircraft carriers. The navy employs specialized planes specifically for this.
@@jkhuskies09 u mean the F-117 doesn't have the equipment to attach with the arresting cable for landing?
@@dallasyap3064 not just the arresting gear.
It doesn’t have a reinforced frame like the F18 or Other navy air craft. An F18 weighs about 15k pounds more than an F16 because it has reinforced framing and beefed up landing gear.
It's bullshit I didn't see him land the aircraft... What's next he will land a Space Shuttle in an aircraft carrier
Well that would have worked if the Space Shuttle used full brakes like mad and on a super short runway.
Seahawk this is iron Eagle
Wait, so Harm is a Pilot, SEAL, and JAG lawyer?🤣🤣🤣
I think only Admiral A.J. Chegwidden was a SEAL.
That’s “Harm” to everyone he can do almost anything.
Pilot and lawyer
columbus franco tampafl.
Ridiculous premise for an episode, especially when he's a lawyer primarily. As a naval pilot, he would have never been allowed near a F-117
I’m sure real JAG lawyers were like “damn it why can’t we have such hot assignments like Harm had?!”.
Only happen in hollyweird
Clickbait! He crashed and BURNED! He DID NOT land the damned thing...even in the simulator!
Captain's hat says CVN-65. That would be the USS Enterprise not Seahawk. Enterprise was still on active duty. The writers were morons to not realize that they couldn't get away with something like that.
Pretty sure they did that with a few other carriers, too. Seems like they wanted to avoid naming or featuring real carriers. I think they had one named Patrick Henry, too.
Way to Go Skipper, from oldest son of Bobby Bruffett Senior dad,my Ford driving Skipper,🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇳🏁🏁🏁🇺🇳🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🇺🇳🇺🇳🏁🏁🇺🇳🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 John Robert Bruffett Junior 🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁🇺🇳🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Haaaahaaaa,as bogus as navy laaaaaawyers!🤣
What a pile of crap. The fake F117 looked nothing like the real plane. HAHA!
The shows now are crap.
So much wrong with this I can barely watch it.
This show REALLY sucked!
This is such bad writing. Can't even watch. A 117 on a carrier by a jag. What a steaming pile of excrement.
harm was like macguver a lot ov rubbish
Wow that's some real tv 🐎 💩. A fighter pilot turned lawyer and yet the Navy saw fit to train a JAG officer on an Air Force F117. Flying isn't like driving a car where one size fits all.