The Ben Keays one is the worst by far. But there's another one from this year, also with the Crows. Inside the last 30 seconds of play, with Collingwood up by two points, Jordan Dawson was smashed in the face by a Collingwood player about 30 meters from goal. Umpire didn't call a free for high contact, probably costing Adelaide the win. AFL had to put out a statement saying that the umpire was wrong and that Dawson should have been given the free.
one of the worst decisions was when Josh Jenkins kicked a "goal" but upon closer inspecting, it actually hit the post, it cost Port a chance to play for finals that season, what makes it even more ironic now, is that it was the same umpire that stupidly called Ben Keays' goal a behind for you guessed it, "hitting the post" for close calls like that, there really should be a compulsory score review, the technology is meant to be there to prevent human error.
With all of the commotion that's gone on about the Crows being potentially robbed of a finals berth after being on the wrong end of the Ben Keays goal umpiring mistake, everyone (Crows supporters in particular) seems to have forgotten that Adelaide got the rub of the green in their favour with that Josh Jenkins decision when replays showed that the ball clearly hit the post.
@@darrenmiles-morland8038but the difference is we admitted it shouldn’t have been. Jenkins said to the whole crowd on mic it hit the post. Sydney acts like they won it properly
Yeah but the difference there was that the umpire wasn't sure, so went upstairs for the review. In that case the tech wasn't good enough to detect it hitting. So the umpire did the right thing, but the technology let them down. Even now, the only reason we all assume it probably did hit the post is because Jenkins told us he thinks it did. With the Keays one, the footage is definitive, but the same umpire for some reason didn't send it upstairs. I suspect that there has been pressure put on the goal umpires to not hold up the game with pointless reviews, I'd love to hear his side of the story. Best solution is to make it so that if the ball hits the post but still goes through, then it counts as a goal. If it bounces back in play then it's a behind, or just play on, which I think is a better idea because it could advantage the attacking team more than a single point would.
@@darrenmiles-morland8038no one has forgotten that, it’s all I see come up, I don’t think we should be arguing or calling it Karma tho. Instead we should cause more commotion as the umpiring and technology hasn’t gotten better all these years later. I think the Crows fans advocating for compensation are dumb, I’m a Crows fan and that’s just not gonna happen and even so bad umpiring decisions ruin games at the end a lot. We should however as AFL fans realise how bad the state of the game has gotten with umpiring and the 30 fps technology that we can seem to never make the correct call during critical moments while every other sport has no problem with that.
@@supaskiltz9877 Referring to the last paragraph, that in itself is the problem, the AFL has enough money to throw around to make the technology better. This is the technology that should have improved, as the system hasn't gotten any better since it was first implemented. which is sad, because all the other sporting codes have score review systems that are far superior to the AFLs. I think instead of the Crows (the team I support) seeking compensation, they should be voicing a means to implement improvements in not only the technology but also when and how it is used, with one potential idea being that players can initiate a score review. for a professional league like the AFL, the standard is simply nowhere near good enough. I would hate to see it happen in the Grand Final, that would force the AFL to act if it were to happen, a small part of me hopes it does happen.
Another one u forgot was round 2 2021 Geelong brisbane. In the last 30 seconds in Brisbane’s forward half, there was a scramble between both sides and Isaac smith contained possession of the ball. He then got tackled and clearly threw the ball, but the umpire didn’t call it.
Doesn’t baffle me. It makes perfect sense, chuck on your AFL ceo hat for a sec and think what would be a better business outcome, 2 vic team grand final or Sydney vs Geelong? AFL needs Sydney to perform so they can compete with NRL.
In addition to the not 15 metre kick in the Geelong vs Sydney game, it took the boundary umpire a good extra 3 seconds to actually call the ball out of bounds aswell because he thought it was a mark.
Adelaide vs Fitzroy, 1991. The only time I will ever say an AFL game was rigged. The last two minutes was absolute dogshit umpiring to get Adelaide over the line.
Aye blew up! Can say I was here haha Love how you used the Adelaide Vs Sydney game. One of the worst decisions by far. Should’ve added that Geelong Vs Brisbane game Amazing video again, wow, keep it up!!
I remember a Essendon vs Freo game at Docklands. Freo's Matthew Carr had a shot on goal but missed, however he was bumped late which would mean that Carr had the choice of having the point or taking a set shot for goal. The umpire was supposed to ask Carr on what he wanted, but the umpire went to the Essendon player instead. I think there's a video around here somewhere.
Keep up the great videos mate, you should make a video reflecting on the AFL season before the finals start if you can. Btw what's your footy team? Just curious yk
I completely agree with the sentiments expressed in the video. Our game continues to improve in leaps and bounds but the one aspect that has gone backwards is the umpiring. I will never be convinced that game has ever needed three umpires let alone the four that we have now. After all, for over a hundred years we only had one. There are so many occasions where there is clearly a conflict between the umpires on whether a free kick is warranted for a particular incident and often as not the umpire furthest away is the one who prevails. Looking at the terrible incident in the Adelaide game where Ben Keys' goal was called a point, if you look at the video there were at least two umpires right behind the kick and it's inconceivable that they didn't see that it was a goal. After all, the players from both sides saw it and reacted accordingly so why not the umpires who then should have called for a review? The 2018 Grand Final is the one that really gets me however. Clearly it was a free kick to Bruzzy Maynard. There is absolutely nothing that gets me more annoyed than when games are decided by the umpires and there have been many of those.
yeah with four umpires on the field you'd expect the umpiring to get better, not the other way around, but sadly that is the case, I would also argue that as more rule changes occur and as the game speeds up, the worse the umpiring gets. AFL House has a degree of blame for it as well, considering the fact that in some weeks they are telling the umpires to crack down on different matters during the game, really what AFL House has to do in the off-season, is instead of focusing on rule changes and looking for ways to speed up the game, is focus on getting the umpiring up to scratch. for a professional sport to not have umpiring up to an acceptable standard, is simply not good enough, maybe it is time for the AFL to put in place a DRS-like system in place, as well as allowing for players to instigate a score review as well, it might slow the game down a little, but it might be healthier for the game itself, and it might even force to umpires to change a quite a bit as well.
@@theflyingdropbear2009 most of the examples given in the video are 50/50 at worst, certainly not worthy of being called "the worst decisions ever." I'm not saying that there aren't any howlers shown, but most of the examples are actually correctly adjudicated. That being said, I agree that there is potential for improvement and that a review system might have merit.
Petracca's point was due to inconclusive evidence, meaning they had to go back to the soft call. Even on replay it looked like it could've been touched, so it's hard to blame the umpire for their soft call. Not one of the worst umpiring decisions of all time imo.
2001 Prelim Ess vs Haw - Goal umpire's decision of touched on the line is reversed by a field umpire 40 metres away and is given to Essendon's Lucas as a goal.
When the umpire called for Robbie Gray to play on after he took a mark inside 50 and was given less than 15 seconds instead of the full 30 seconds and in the 2014 prelim against the hawks where Port should have been given a free kick inside their forward 50 (which would have been the match winner) was not awarded because the afl wanted a vfl premiership yet again.
Sharrod Wellingham got awarded a goal in the 2011 Grand Final that clearly hit the post too. Did you forget that one? Just as much as a howler as the Tom Hawkins one in 2009, but possibly the square-up for Geelong.
interesting thing with that though, Hawkin's "goal" hit the post but no one realised until a few minutes after play, that "goal" in the 2011 grand final, everybody knew the moment it happened.
@@whitemamba0312 I'm not saying they've been the most looked after, but they aren't remotely close to being the "most done by this season"... like at all...
Do you remember the 2016 grand final? It was the worst umpiring I've seen and it wasn't one decision, it was a whole host of poor umpiring decisions that went the way of the dogs. I think the guy making the video is featuring sydney alot because he's bitter towards sydney after the loss
1997 Semi Final Adelaide V Geelong. The whole match was one bad umpiring performance to get the Crows over the line, culminating in the Leigh Colbert mark controversy.
1:28 this isn't a free because Rowbottom was saved by the siren. Also, how you could make a list of bad umpire decisions and not include Bailey's non HTB call against the cats in 2021 is ridiculous.
Ben Keays goal was a goal I was there and as an Adelaide fan this puts me in tears. The umpires need to stop making excuses and start calling stuff properly.😢🤬😭🤬😭🤬😭🤬🥺 👇like
Good video man. Would’ve loved to have seen the one of Howe taking on a tackle and then laying on top of the ball in the goal square in that gf final. That was a huge one in the last qtr that they missed
Zac Bailey landed on Mark Blicavs' back when he tackled him to the ground. It was no different to what happened with Cam Mooney when he fell onto an opposition player's back after tackling him to the ground in the 2010 Qualifying Final when Cameron Ling got disallowed a goal late in the match which would have put Geelong in front and potentially won them that match. Everyone focuses on Blicavs disposing of the ball incorrectly when having prior opportunity. No-one ever notices that Bailey falls onto his back after tackling him to the ground. The umpire may have been undecided which way to call it. Perhaps play on was a fair enough call in that instance.
rioli prevented maynard from making the contest... that's an objective fact. now under AFL laws at the time, it should have been deemed a block. bygones are bygones i guess
0:34 i agree with the umpires call, I feel alot of people misunderstand the holding th ball rule. holding the ball only counts when the player either has prior or an oppurtunity to pass the ball and doesn't, or improperly disposes of the ball, if a player tackles the player with the ball mid kick, an attempt has been made and doesnt count as holding the ball. we've been trying to decrease umpire abuse to get more umpires as we dont have enough atleast where i umpire. just to note we are all human we all make mistakes
The Tom Papley mark is partly the correct call. Paps pushed Moore, yes, but he also copped a pretty heavy knock to the head from the spoil attempt (obvious from the footage used in this video). Since it's a free going both ways technically it should have been a ball up, but since Papley also marked the ball, the umpire let it stand. Another recent one was Cameron's handball receive and goal while out of bounds and surrounded by umpires. Also the entire 2016 grand final was one big terrible umpiring decision.
AFL high ups would’ve been pissed if Sydney didn’t make the grand final and instead it was collingwood Geelong 2 vic teams. No money or business In that.
When Jordan Clark was tackled he actually got his foot to the ball, effectively kicking it as Butler tackled him. The umpire was right to call play on, on this occasion.
2022 round 1 Richmond Carlton- dochertys 50m pen, stood on the mark didn’t move, no interference yet still got a 50 for nothing, worst call I’ve ever seen to date, won them the game
Nick Malceski is intially under no perceived pressure and waits for the Carlton player to move toward him before backing over the line. Jordan Clark actually kicks the ball, albeit just hits his boot which is all he needs to do under the laws.
Couple wrong reviews. The Sydney vs Geelong one was called touched (where it was actually touched or not im not sure), it wasn't play on for not travelling 15 metres. That definitely was NOT HTB in the same one either. 2:20 Collingwood v Essendon, he did dispose of the ball correctly, he threw it on his boot. Lead into a correct PTB decision. But apart from that spot on.
Adelaide vs Sydney did matter. Had it been played a goal Adelaide would of finished on 48pts and Sydney would of finished on 46pts meaning Adelaide would of finished 8th and played finals
Sheed did not play on. It was his momentum carrying him backwards past the mark. That's not "playing on". As for the "block", it could be argued that Maynard blocked Rioli from contesting. Maynard runs at Rioli, with his back to the ball, Rioli stands his ground and the two grapple. Who has blocked who? Not to mention the ball fell short of both of them anyway. The rushed behind was the right call. I know, I know, the rules allow for it. But he waited for the pressure to come, meaning he had ample time to dispose of it. The umpire used a bit of common sense (something we're always screaming at them to use) and basically said "you weren't under pressure, you clearly waited for the pressure to come before crossing the line. You made no attempt to move the ball on while you weren't under pressure. You've deliberately rushed the behind. Free kick".
Coming from an umpire myself, a lot of the "Missed" decisions stem from the AFL`s interpretation of the rule. For example, some Holding-the-ball free kicks are played on for the sake of the flow of the game. Unfortunately, all this does is increase decent towards us and create double/inconsistency within the game.
What a bloody disgrace the Keays non goal was. Cost the crows finals. If you want to see the most biased umpiring ever seen have a look at how the umpires favoured Richmond in the 2017 Grand Final. Truly disgusting.
Ben Keays one a crows supporter myself it is completely not okay. Crows needed that goal if they won the crowds would have gotten bigger meaning the umpire gets paid more........?
wasn't even the worse missed call by the AFL/Goal umpire at that end of adelaide oval. the josh jenkins showdown 45 debacle was significantly worse lmao...
Interesting how "AFL History" barely covers the past 5-8 years, as there were plenty of umpiring brainfarts prior to a lot of these. That said, outside of the Keays' incident this year, I'd rate Sirengate over all of these, let alone Tom Hawkins receiving a handball while he was out of bounds and kicks a goal from outside the boundary line.. I want to say that was in a Grand Final as well.
The umpires have been pretty desperate to give buddy that premiership at Sydney, the umpires have fucked over Geelong when Sydney played them multiple times and they did it to Collingwood as well. I hope all Geelong and Collingwood fans can sit happy though knowing Sydney got thrashed in 2022
think the richmond review against brisbane should be in here. the crows one only kept them from playing finals the tigers one cost them a potential grand final, only team that even looked like beating the cats last year!
that Dockers-Saints holding the ball fiasco was such a joke... like yes the Saints player got pinged holding the ball, he took enough steps to get rid of it, I wont say that was a wrong call, but it shouldn't have been a call that needed to be paid either... the play should've have been continued after the first call was missed as we all know
The Adelaide decision should have been given a goal, and the time consumed in the meantime, been added back onto the clock. Centre bounce to follow. I am definitely not an Adelaide fan, but on that occasion they were robbed.
@@jr87-87 That's always been my take on it. Everyone knows what he was trying to do, but Rioli did basically everything right to get away with it - be in the vicinity of where the ball will be landing (holding your ground), eyes on the ball, and made a movement towards the drop of the ball as it landed to simulate a genuine attempt at a mark - which he would have been able to take if Sheed wasn't there. He was 100% doing it to block Maynard out, but he could genuinely claim to be holding his ground for a contested mark. If he doesn't do any of those things, the umpire is paying a free kick for a block. Rioli simply did it well enough to get away with it.
I have been saying this for a few years now, THERE ARE NO RULES, NO DESCENT CAMERAS, go back to our basic game and stop worrying about Gather Round GILLION!!
Jeremy Cameron wasn't paid the mark because it was touched, if you weren't death you'd understand that. Also, Maynard engaged with Rioli, Rioli had his eyes on the ball so where's the block? How about when Howe should've been pinged for holding the ball but wasn't in our goal square and then Collingwood kicked a goal? That could've robbed West Coast the premiership. Do you like making yourself look stupid? Because you wouldn't have made those examples if you don't.
That Willie rioli one,he was the only one of the two facing the ball,he's allowed to stand his ground and was in the contest area for a mark. So get over it
2022 freo v kilda, you can see the first one gets very slight boot to ball but the second one didnt dispose of with legitimate time, look closely before callling it a bad umpiring decision yeah
The Ben Keays one is the worst by far. But there's another one from this year, also with the Crows. Inside the last 30 seconds of play, with Collingwood up by two points, Jordan Dawson was smashed in the face by a Collingwood player about 30 meters from goal. Umpire didn't call a free for high contact, probably costing Adelaide the win. AFL had to put out a statement saying that the umpire was wrong and that Dawson should have been given the free.
Yes, hoping to do a part 2 which would definitely include this umpiring decision, thankyou for the suggestion
@@Kaleen_YT mate you could have about 400 parts with the way the umpires are now days...
Mate it’s the block
Buddy, the umpires make so many calls like this like every year three teams miss the finals due to these sorts of decisions
@@Kaleen_YTpart 2? LFG
one of the worst decisions was when Josh Jenkins kicked a "goal" but upon closer inspecting, it actually hit the post, it cost Port a chance to play for finals that season, what makes it even more ironic now, is that it was the same umpire that stupidly called Ben Keays' goal a behind for you guessed it, "hitting the post"
for close calls like that, there really should be a compulsory score review, the technology is meant to be there to prevent human error.
With all of the commotion that's gone on about the Crows being potentially robbed of a finals berth after being on the wrong end of the Ben Keays goal umpiring mistake, everyone (Crows supporters in particular) seems to have forgotten that Adelaide got the rub of the green in their favour with that Josh Jenkins decision when replays showed that the ball clearly hit the post.
@@darrenmiles-morland8038but the difference is we admitted it shouldn’t have been. Jenkins said to the whole crowd on mic it hit the post. Sydney acts like they won it properly
Yeah but the difference there was that the umpire wasn't sure, so went upstairs for the review. In that case the tech wasn't good enough to detect it hitting. So the umpire did the right thing, but the technology let them down. Even now, the only reason we all assume it probably did hit the post is because Jenkins told us he thinks it did. With the Keays one, the footage is definitive, but the same umpire for some reason didn't send it upstairs. I suspect that there has been pressure put on the goal umpires to not hold up the game with pointless reviews, I'd love to hear his side of the story. Best solution is to make it so that if the ball hits the post but still goes through, then it counts as a goal. If it bounces back in play then it's a behind, or just play on, which I think is a better idea because it could advantage the attacking team more than a single point would.
@@darrenmiles-morland8038no one has forgotten that, it’s all I see come up, I don’t think we should be arguing or calling it Karma tho. Instead we should cause more commotion as the umpiring and technology hasn’t gotten better all these years later.
I think the Crows fans advocating for compensation are dumb, I’m a Crows fan and that’s just not gonna happen and even so bad umpiring decisions ruin games at the end a lot.
We should however as AFL fans realise how bad the state of the game has gotten with umpiring and the 30 fps technology that we can seem to never make the correct call during critical moments while every other sport has no problem with that.
@@supaskiltz9877 Referring to the last paragraph, that in itself is the problem, the AFL has enough money to throw around to make the technology better. This is the technology that should have improved, as the system hasn't gotten any better since it was first implemented. which is sad, because all the other sporting codes have score review systems that are far superior to the AFLs.
I think instead of the Crows (the team I support) seeking compensation, they should be voicing a means to implement improvements in not only the technology but also when and how it is used, with one potential idea being that players can initiate a score review.
for a professional league like the AFL, the standard is simply nowhere near good enough. I would hate to see it happen in the Grand Final, that would force the AFL to act if it were to happen, a small part of me hopes it does happen.
Another one u forgot was round 2 2021 Geelong brisbane. In the last 30 seconds in Brisbane’s forward half, there was a scramble between both sides and Isaac smith contained possession of the ball. He then got tackled and clearly threw the ball, but the umpire didn’t call it.
Good channel mate.
Well researched & presented.
that Papley one against the Pies still baffles me to this day
Doesn’t baffle me. It makes perfect sense, chuck on your AFL ceo hat for a sec and think what would be a better business outcome, 2 vic team grand final or Sydney vs Geelong? AFL needs Sydney to perform so they can compete with NRL.
Papley cops high contact from the attempted spoil. So it's actually a free both ways, the umpire just let the mark stand rather than ball it up.
Collingwood had 10 minutes to make it not matter. Ridiculous to suggest it decided the game.
In addition to the not 15 metre kick in the Geelong vs Sydney game, it took the boundary umpire a good extra 3 seconds to actually call the ball out of bounds aswell because he thought it was a mark.
Adelaide vs Fitzroy, 1991.
The only time I will ever say an AFL game was rigged. The last two minutes was absolute dogshit umpiring to get Adelaide over the line.
if you actually slow down the jordan clarke decision you’ll see that he actually kicked it. elite decision from stevic.
No the ball dropped on the ground then started bouncing
@@lankylorry95 no, the ball hit the side of his boot.
it was an ineffective disposal, but a disposal nonetheless.
@@lankylorry95 what’s the point in lying to yourself about it? it’s very clear once you slow it down.
Good Video. I Saw the Ben Keays Incident. That Was So Bad How That Was a Behind!!
Appreciate it.
Aye blew up! Can say I was here haha
Love how you used the Adelaide Vs Sydney game. One of the worst decisions by far. Should’ve added that Geelong Vs Brisbane game
Amazing video again, wow, keep it up!!
Thankyou, means a lot!
I remember a Essendon vs Freo game at Docklands. Freo's Matthew Carr had a shot on goal but missed, however he was bumped late which would mean that Carr had the choice of having the point or taking a set shot for goal. The umpire was supposed to ask Carr on what he wanted, but the umpire went to the Essendon player instead. I think there's a video around here somewhere.
ruclips.net/video/IkDNbgO7RSU/видео.htmlsi=tajFV_3zHBrM5icQ
That was an all-timer 😆🤢
2009 GF St kilda v Geelong. Tom Hawkins open goal hits the post and still awarded a goal. The rest is history 😢
Too soon 💔
Keep up the great videos mate, you should make a video reflecting on the AFL season before the finals start if you can. Btw what's your footy team? Just curious yk
Glad you're enjoying the videos. Also thanks for the idea, I'll definitely consider it. I go for Sydney.
I completely agree with the sentiments expressed in the video. Our game continues to improve in leaps and bounds but the one aspect that has gone backwards is the umpiring. I will never be convinced that game has ever needed three umpires let alone the four that we have now. After all, for over a hundred years we only had one. There are so many occasions where there is clearly a conflict between the umpires on whether a free kick is warranted for a particular incident and often as not the umpire furthest away is the one who prevails.
Looking at the terrible incident in the Adelaide game where Ben Keys' goal was called a point, if you look at the video there were at least two umpires right behind the kick and it's inconceivable that they didn't see that it was a goal. After all, the players from both sides saw it and reacted accordingly so why not the umpires who then should have called for a review?
The 2018 Grand Final is the one that really gets me however. Clearly it was a free kick to Bruzzy Maynard.
There is absolutely nothing that gets me more annoyed than when games are decided by the umpires and there have been many of those.
very well said.
yeah with four umpires on the field you'd expect the umpiring to get better, not the other way around, but sadly that is the case, I would also argue that as more rule changes occur and as the game speeds up, the worse the umpiring gets.
AFL House has a degree of blame for it as well, considering the fact that in some weeks they are telling the umpires to crack down on different matters during the game, really what AFL House has to do in the off-season, is instead of focusing on rule changes and looking for ways to speed up the game, is focus on getting the umpiring up to scratch.
for a professional sport to not have umpiring up to an acceptable standard, is simply not good enough, maybe it is time for the AFL to put in place a DRS-like system in place, as well as allowing for players to instigate a score review as well, it might slow the game down a little, but it might be healthier for the game itself, and it might even force to umpires to change a quite a bit as well.
@@theflyingdropbear2009 most of the examples given in the video are 50/50 at worst, certainly not worthy of being called "the worst decisions ever." I'm not saying that there aren't any howlers shown, but most of the examples are actually correctly adjudicated.
That being said, I agree that there is potential for improvement and that a review system might have merit.
You forgot
- Petraccas ‘point’ v Carlton
- Jezza Cameron mark and goal which were out of bounds
- Tom lynch ‘point’ V Brisbane last year
Part 2 coming soon?
That point in the richmond elim final was a confirmed point to be fair, a bunch of angles came out after that showed it was pretty clear
Petracca's point was due to inconclusive evidence, meaning they had to go back to the soft call. Even on replay it looked like it could've been touched, so it's hard to blame the umpire for their soft call. Not one of the worst umpiring decisions of all time imo.
2001 Prelim Ess vs Haw - Goal umpire's decision of touched on the line is reversed by a field umpire 40 metres away and is given to Essendon's Lucas as a goal.
When the umpire called for Robbie Gray to play on after he took a mark inside 50 and was given less than 15 seconds instead of the full 30 seconds and in the 2014 prelim against the hawks where Port should have been given a free kick inside their forward 50 (which would have been the match winner) was not awarded because the afl wanted a vfl premiership yet again.
Tom Hawkins "goal" in the 09 grand final was right up there too
Sharrod Wellingham got awarded a goal in the 2011 Grand Final that clearly hit the post too. Did you forget that one? Just as much as a howler as the Tom Hawkins one in 2009, but possibly the square-up for Geelong.
interesting thing with that though, Hawkin's "goal" hit the post but no one realised until a few minutes after play, that "goal" in the 2011 grand final, everybody knew the moment it happened.
Sydney seem to feature a lot, getting looked after by the umpires. Suspicious, no wonder ive always hated that club
swans have probably been the most done by this season in umpiring besides that last game lmao
@@whitemamba0312 I'm not saying they've been the most looked after, but they aren't remotely close to being the "most done by this season"... like at all...
Do you remember the 2016 grand final? It was the worst umpiring I've seen and it wasn't one decision, it was a whole host of poor umpiring decisions that went the way of the dogs. I think the guy making the video is featuring sydney alot because he's bitter towards sydney after the loss
1997 Semi Final Adelaide V Geelong. The whole match was one bad umpiring performance to get the Crows over the line, culminating in the Leigh Colbert mark controversy.
1:28 this isn't a free because Rowbottom was saved by the siren.
Also, how you could make a list of bad umpire decisions and not include Bailey's non HTB call against the cats in 2021 is ridiculous.
Will be in Part 2
0:07 why’d u add that. Dom sheed only took1 foot of the ground and both Maynard and roili were blocking each other. Collingwood lost that on there own
just what I thought of the situation
@@Kaleen_YT I agree with you. Maynard was blocked and rules are rules, and even a step off the mark shouldn't be allowed.
@@yez I’m so confused. Kaleen said he agreed with me but then u said u agree with him but u said the opposite of me, pls help me out I’m lost lol
no i meant what i said in the video was just what I thought of the situation
Oh ok 😊
Ben Keays goal was a goal I was there and as an Adelaide fan this puts me in tears.
The umpires need to stop making excuses and start calling stuff properly.😢🤬😭🤬😭🤬😭🤬🥺
👇like
Good video man. Would’ve loved to have seen the one of Howe taking on a tackle and then laying on top of the ball in the goal square in that gf final. That was a huge one in the last qtr that they missed
Appreciate it mate.
U forgot Zac Bailey Tackle on Blicavs holding the ball not called right in the goal square round 2 2021
Saving that for part 2
Zac Bailey landed on Mark Blicavs' back when he tackled him to the ground. It was no different to what happened with Cam Mooney when he fell onto an opposition player's back after tackling him to the ground in the 2010 Qualifying Final when Cameron Ling got disallowed a goal late in the match which would have put Geelong in front and potentially won them that match. Everyone focuses on Blicavs disposing of the ball incorrectly when having prior opportunity. No-one ever notices that Bailey falls onto his back after tackling him to the ground. The umpire may have been undecided which way to call it. Perhaps play on was a fair enough call in that instance.
@@darrenmiles-morland8038 even the afl admitted that it should’ve been holding the ball tho
Maynard wasn’t blocked. They are both wrestling each other
Blocked or played on take your pick
@@Bennythejet93 neither? Sheed took the mark.
Rioli and Maynard both wrestled behind where the ball was actually marked.
@@officialHbTcs lol good one.. Maynard was blocked and sheed definitely played on simple as that
@@Bennythejet93 okay cooker
rioli prevented maynard from making the contest... that's an objective fact.
now under AFL laws at the time, it should have been deemed a block.
bygones are bygones i guess
0:34 i agree with the umpires call, I feel alot of people misunderstand the holding th ball rule. holding the ball only counts when the player either has prior or an oppurtunity to pass the ball and doesn't, or improperly disposes of the ball, if a player tackles the player with the ball mid kick, an attempt has been made and doesnt count as holding the ball. we've been trying to decrease umpire abuse to get more umpires as we dont have enough atleast where i umpire. just to note we are all human we all make mistakes
As a Collingwood supporter looking back that Essondon game what preeetty bad 😅
The Tom Papley mark is partly the correct call. Paps pushed Moore, yes, but he also copped a pretty heavy knock to the head from the spoil attempt (obvious from the footage used in this video). Since it's a free going both ways technically it should have been a ball up, but since Papley also marked the ball, the umpire let it stand.
Another recent one was Cameron's handball receive and goal while out of bounds and surrounded by umpires. Also the entire 2016 grand final was one big terrible umpiring decision.
AFL high ups would’ve been pissed if Sydney didn’t make the grand final and instead it was collingwood Geelong 2 vic teams. No money or business In that.
When Jordan Clark was tackled he actually got his foot to the ball, effectively kicking it as Butler tackled him. The umpire was right to call play on, on this occasion.
The showdown 2018 was controversial
2022 round 1 Richmond Carlton- dochertys 50m pen, stood on the mark didn’t move, no interference yet still got a 50 for nothing, worst call I’ve ever seen to date, won them the game
3:40 I still don’t feel like it was a push tbh
Well I go for Sydney aswell haha so just want to assure you its not a biased opinion
Yeah I always thought it was pretty damn soft and side on, more of holding is ground which you're allowed to do
@@Kaleen_YT fair enough
not the whole south Australia as a port fan i was very happy
poor collingwobbles hopefully they lose by one point by a wrong umpire decision in the grandfinal this year
We gotta get there first. 😅
Nick Malceski is intially under no perceived pressure and waits for the Carlton player to move toward him before backing over the line.
Jordan Clark actually kicks the ball, albeit just hits his boot which is all he needs to do under the laws.
I’m amazed this video doesn’t go on for 1 hour because their are so many
Couple wrong reviews.
The Sydney vs Geelong one was called touched (where it was actually touched or not im not sure), it wasn't play on for not travelling 15 metres. That definitely was NOT HTB in the same one either.
2:20 Collingwood v Essendon, he did dispose of the ball correctly, he threw it on his boot. Lead into a correct PTB decision.
But apart from that spot on.
Thankyou
Adelaide vs Sydney did matter. Had it been played a goal Adelaide would of finished on 48pts and Sydney would of finished on 46pts meaning Adelaide would of finished 8th and played finals
Dom Sheed’s goal was the worst and so was Tom Papley’s
stay ad, collingwood supporter
Hate the crows but that ben keays one was a shocker. Having said that he's not the greatest kick and that was probably one of his best lol
Good video SPECKIE
The Ben keays one by far
Grand final
Sheed did not play on. It was his momentum carrying him backwards past the mark. That's not "playing on". As for the "block", it could be argued that Maynard blocked Rioli from contesting. Maynard runs at Rioli, with his back to the ball, Rioli stands his ground and the two grapple. Who has blocked who? Not to mention the ball fell short of both of them anyway.
The rushed behind was the right call. I know, I know, the rules allow for it. But he waited for the pressure to come, meaning he had ample time to dispose of it. The umpire used a bit of common sense (something we're always screaming at them to use) and basically said "you weren't under pressure, you clearly waited for the pressure to come before crossing the line. You made no attempt to move the ball on while you weren't under pressure. You've deliberately rushed the behind. Free kick".
Coming from an umpire myself, a lot of the "Missed" decisions stem from the AFL`s interpretation of the rule. For example, some Holding-the-ball free kicks are played on for the sake of the flow of the game. Unfortunately, all this does is increase decent towards us and create double/inconsistency within the game.
How did you make your own RUclips channel
why does the music make me wanna cry...
Haha
4:20 that was nothing but an uneducated umpire that should learn what a 'block' is
wasnt even a block buddy boy, rioli was there first, had his eyes on the ball, simply going for a contested mark, get over it.
That Ben Keays one is horrible
What a bloody disgrace the Keays non goal was. Cost the crows finals. If you want to see the most biased umpiring ever seen have a look at how the umpires favoured Richmond in the 2017 Grand Final. Truly disgusting.
Ben Keays one a crows supporter myself it is completely not okay. Crows needed that goal if they won the crowds would have gotten bigger meaning the umpire gets paid more........?
I dont understand how you can call an obvious goal a point.
Ben Keys goal would have to take some beating.
wasn't even the worse missed call by the AFL/Goal umpire at that end of adelaide oval.
the josh jenkins showdown 45 debacle was significantly worse lmao...
Interesting how "AFL History" barely covers the past 5-8 years, as there were plenty of umpiring brainfarts prior to a lot of these.
That said, outside of the Keays' incident this year, I'd rate Sirengate over all of these, let alone Tom Hawkins receiving a handball while he was out of bounds and kicks a goal from outside the boundary line.. I want to say that was in a Grand Final as well.
the goal umpire not calling fir a score review 100% the worst
You may as well put up the infamous Gary ablett snr "mark"
even though i am a freo fan in the background brandon walker is tripped
but still that was ball
U said that the whole of SA was mad u forgot port exists
Sydney must have a secret pact with the umpires. Look at how many times they’ve been saved
The umpires have been pretty desperate to give buddy that premiership at Sydney, the umpires have fucked over Geelong when Sydney played them multiple times and they did it to Collingwood as well. I hope all Geelong and Collingwood fans can sit happy though knowing Sydney got thrashed in 2022
i don't know about that
That Essendon not winning a final isn’t funny
Pretty funny to me
Funny af
PREETY funny to me so cry about it
You're right, it's HILARIOUS!
Daniher didn’t actually make Crisp lose the ball. He took him to ground by the waist and crisp then handball’s it
100 percent the ben keys one my dad told me that the umpire was fired for the rest of the year im so angry obout the dawson one aswell
think the richmond review against brisbane should be in here. the crows one only kept them from playing finals the tigers one cost them a potential grand final, only team that even looked like beating the cats last year!
If you do a part 2 you should add trac vs carlton
Frickin Rioli, we could have one that GF
1:59 That isnt a bad decision. Jack Crisp clearly disposed the ball about a second after he was ran down.
0:23 naaahhhhhhhhh 💀
He did them dirty lol
“Absolutely gobsmacked!”
im pretty sure the second clip, his boot scrapes the ball thus making it bounce off awkward
Don’t talk about Essendon not winning a grand final
To be honest as a Essendon supporter I can truly understand that only if it’s for 5 years😂
The block by far
ur high, u pies fans are so quick to criticise everyone else, but are completely oblivious when your team does the same thintg every game
The Dumb sheed one was the worst one in the video
Its just VIC Bias that Swans Feature so much
Interstate bias is real, particularly nsw
Have to be the fantom hitting of the post for the crows. I watched the game not knowing this was going to happen. I hope the goal ump got fired.
that Dockers-Saints holding the ball fiasco was such a joke... like yes the Saints player got pinged holding the ball, he took enough steps to get rid of it, I wont say that was a wrong call, but it shouldn't have been a call that needed to be paid either... the play should've have been continued after the first call was missed as we all know
The crows one I was at the game
The Adelaide decision should have been given a goal, and the time consumed in the meantime, been added back onto the clock. Centre bounce to follow. I am definitely not an Adelaide fan, but on that occasion they were robbed.
Great video 👏 Crom robbed
Appreciate it KlutchKlaus, yes definitely
I wouldn’t call the Maynard block one of the worst of all time, it’s definitely there but it’s not as obvious as some of the other ones
I think it’s only considered because it won the eagles the granny
@@jr87-87 That's always been my take on it. Everyone knows what he was trying to do, but Rioli did basically everything right to get away with it - be in the vicinity of where the ball will be landing (holding your ground), eyes on the ball, and made a movement towards the drop of the ball as it landed to simulate a genuine attempt at a mark - which he would have been able to take if Sheed wasn't there. He was 100% doing it to block Maynard out, but he could genuinely claim to be holding his ground for a contested mark. If he doesn't do any of those things, the umpire is paying a free kick for a block. Rioli simply did it well enough to get away with it.
wheres port v geelong rnd 21
Your Wong that umpire decision didn’t Upset the whole of South Australia because most likely didn’t upset the Port , Adelaide Power fans go power
true
I'm a poet fan and I thought that call was a disgrace and wrong
Gws vs carlton round 3. Stole the giants momentum and basicallly gave carlton a free 4 points which could cost the giants finals
Brisbane v Bulldogs semi final in 2021. The most one-sided biased umpiring ive ever seen in footy. Cost the Lions a spot in the prelim
Disagreed!
You would have lost that gf if you made it anyway
2:29 one of the worst umpired games ever
It wasn’t even a behind
Cogs dissent in Carlton vs GWS was a pretty bad call
Maynard was not a block. You can very well tell the eagle is looking up at the ball.
Collingwood robbed of possibly 2 grand finals & a record for most grand final wins due to bad umpiring
Geelong and Sydney was disgraceful that was a mark all day if that Sydney's they would have payed that
Rarer than Essendon winning a finals game huh,bro probably said that because he goes for north or west coast
The crows vs swans
I have been saying this for a few years now, THERE ARE NO RULES, NO DESCENT CAMERAS, go back to our basic game and stop worrying about Gather Round GILLION!!
Jeremy Cameron wasn't paid the mark because it was touched, if you weren't death you'd understand that. Also, Maynard engaged with Rioli, Rioli had his eyes on the ball so where's the block? How about when Howe should've been pinged for holding the ball but wasn't in our goal square and then Collingwood kicked a goal? That could've robbed West Coast the premiership. Do you like making yourself look stupid? Because you wouldn't have made those examples if you don't.
That Willie rioli one,he was the only one of the two facing the ball,he's allowed to stand his ground and was in the contest area for a mark. So get over it
YES FINALLY, SOMEONE WHO DOESNT HAVE HALF A FUCKING BRAIN
Ben keays one has to be the worst
Yeah that was a point
@@LclcFanLclc don't think so😢
not even the worse goal umpiring mistake at that end of adelaide oval...
not sure how it can be the worst in history given that knowledge...
2022 freo v kilda, you can see the first one gets very slight boot to ball but the second one didnt dispose of with legitimate time, look closely before callling it a bad umpiring decision yeah
so you are a collingwood supporter because both the collingwood ones in finals were correct
i am a sydney supporter
@@Kaleen_YT yeah sure you are you act like a Collingwood one because both those finals ones of Collingwood supporters say they are wrong
I'm not a collingwood supporter, infact my side are considered rivals of collingwood... that being said, both decisions in this video were wrong.
no they weren't
@@chadchadderton
@@varch18 they were tho... it's just a fact.