Let's Play! Plains Indian Wars (Solitaire Playthrough)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 май 2022
  • This is a playthrough of the 2 player and solitaire wargame Plains Indian Wars. I am using the solitaire variant #1, pitting the U.S. & Indian allies (You) vs the Plains Indians (AI). PIW is a card-driven cube boardgame designed by John Poniske, and published by GMT. PIW features a solitaire system developed by Etienne Michot.
    Support me directly!
    Monthly:
    / wargaminghansen
    Buy me a Coffee or 1/10th of a wargame:
    ko-fi.com/wargaminghansen
    paypal.me/wargaminghansen
    All donations will be used to create additional content
    The game on BGG: boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/2...
    The game on the publisher's website: www.gmtgames.com/p-654-plains...
    Contact me: On BGG at username "wtjbatman", or via email at murdly@gmail.com

Комментарии • 29

  • @WayneHansen
    @WayneHansen  2 года назад

    Hey everyone! I hope you liked the video. If you did, I'd love to think I earned your subscription. It really helps me to get more of these great games to show off! You can also help by subscribing to my Patreon: www.patreon.com/wargaminghansen OR making a One-time donation: paypal.me/wargaminghansen

  • @j.s.4240
    @j.s.4240 2 года назад +7

    I enjoyed the review. Great game. Love the components and ease of play. Here are the corrections I noticed:
    05:15 - conduct a Night Stealth Engagement (you caught this later)
    10:40 - conduct an Ambush before the engagement
    14:25 - conduct an Ambush
    29:15 - conduct an Ambush
    31:50 - should have removed the White Wagon cube from W-S1 instead of W-S2
    39:54 - conduct an Ambush
    48:50 - NPT wagon engagement: wagons always roll 2 brown dice; each NPT hit symbol counts as a hit (do not need two symbols to get one hit in the solitaire variant); blanks are ignored; both sides rolling treaties ends the engagement causing the wagon to advance one trail region
    54:00 - the maximum number of Blue Cavalry cubes that can be placed in Sacramento is 1 (up to 4 Brown Settlers cubes)
    57:00 - Wagons roll 2 brown dice; remember to engage all White wagons on the trails coexisting with Plains Indians during the NPT/SPT disc draw.
    1:06:55 - the Sheridan card can be played in any NPT region containing a NPT cube; its a good opportunity to break up a 4-cube or 3-cube concentration since the NPT does not roll on the first round. The Plenty Coups card can be played to disallow treaties during an engagement; yes you are only rolling a maximum of 2 NPT dice. In any regard, if you want a fresh hand of 3 cards, play them to get rid of them; taking them out of the deck shortens the deck which acts as a timer triggering the games end so you cannot do that.
    1:08:57 - it looks like the SPT also got a hit during the engagement
    1:10:38 - both sides rolling treaties would end the engagement
    1:11:11 - conduct an Ambush
    1:13:29 - Wagons roll 2 brown dice

    • @WayneHansen
      @WayneHansen  2 года назад +2

      Thanks for the very, uh, detailed list of corrections. Should help anyone who actually wants to try and learn this game. Trying to learn it from the rulebook is not enjoyable. Not a review btw, just a playthrough, the review is coming later this week.

    • @j.s.4240
      @j.s.4240 2 года назад +2

      Yes, its just clarifications for the benefit of the viewer. Just trying to help out. Great play-through as usual.

  • @Quimerico_Inquilino
    @Quimerico_Inquilino 11 месяцев назад +1

    Really very useful. We need videos like this to make up for such terrible rules. Thank you so much.

  • @davidk6269
    @davidk6269 2 года назад +2

    After watching the show "1883" I find myself intrigued by the U.S./Indian conflicts. Thanks for this play-through.

  • @blastpop
    @blastpop Год назад +1

    To clarify in the two-player game "Cubes may overstack during placement but may not be over-stacked in combat or at the end of the faction’s turn". This is an important difference from the solo version which enforces a placement limit. Thought it might be worthwhile to mention if moving between solo and 2 player versions.

  • @dennissvitak6453
    @dennissvitak6453 2 года назад +1

    The track of the railroad in the west went WELL north of Salt Lake City, and met up with the UP at Promontory Point. Brigham Young personally paid for a spur line, to run NORTH, to intersect the railway near there.

    • @christianvansomeren3760
      @christianvansomeren3760 2 года назад +1

      All games are alternate history, we could just assume that the railroad took a different route than it did historically.
      But yes, I agree that it is a shame that the map is not very accurate.

  • @bankingonmoney8224
    @bankingonmoney8224 2 года назад +2

    When attacking a region containing one Indian cube, the Indians may ambush before combat. You missed the ambush roll prior to combat.
    Thanks for the playthrough. I really like this game. I've had cluster battle hurt and help me in games. The struggle in the purple areas are real as the SPT and NPT can spread real quick.

    • @WayneHansen
      @WayneHansen  2 года назад +1

      Yep, the Ambush rule was an easy one for me to miss in my games. Not sure why, just didn't become second nature.

  • @camelxhol551
    @camelxhol551 2 года назад +2

    Great Wayne, appreciate this.

  • @tommloye4626
    @tommloye4626 2 года назад +2

    Outstanding. Thank you. This one has been on my wish list for a bit. The great thing about playing solitaire is rules, especially when written ambiguously, are sometimes really just “suggestions.” :)

  • @FrankPipitone
    @FrankPipitone 2 года назад +2

    I was actually playing this while watching your video. I think there is an errata somewhere that changes the key territories for control in solo play. I believe they are Bozeman, Black Hills, Phoenix and Dallas but I could totally be making that up. I thought I saw that somewhere and it's how I've played. Great play as always!

    • @WayneHansen
      @WayneHansen  2 года назад +1

      Thanks Frankie. I think I read that too, but I remember it as Etienne said it was an alternate/harder option? I'm not sure. Anyway, the solo game is hard enough as-is for me, I don't need to make it any more difficult.

    • @j.s.4240
      @j.s.4240 2 года назад +1

      Correct, its an optional rule.

  • @thepleasurechest2177
    @thepleasurechest2177 Год назад +3

    Thank you. I am having a hard time making sense of much of the game due to anxiety over the wording in the rules.

    • @WayneHansen
      @WayneHansen  Год назад +1

      Hope this gives you a little help. The rulebook has issues, that's for sure, but the gameplay itself is a lot of fun.

  • @floa.5406
    @floa.5406 2 года назад +1

    Very nice Playthrough and teaching the rules!
    I wonder what you have could do better to reach a higher score?! It seems that the dice rolls were kind of balanced and due to some forgotten ambushes and night engagements you have been little bit in advantage. So what to do different to win the game? ;-)

    • @WayneHansen
      @WayneHansen  2 года назад +2

      Thanks Flo! One (big) thing I could have done was to be more aggressive in expanding. I mostly focused on moving the U.S. cavalry and settlers together adjacent to the railroad. If I had spread them out more, and taken control of more areas, I would have both reduced the VPs the AI earned while also increasing my own VPs. A second thing I could have done, in addition to expanding, was target the larger (3 and 4 cube) concentrations of tribes/cubes. By eliminating or reducing them, that would also reduce the VPs the AI would earn.

  • @dennissvitak6453
    @dennissvitak6453 2 года назад

    The track of the Union Pacific went through Omaha, which is NORTH of the Platte River. Again, the map isn't even remotely close.

  • @vincec5260
    @vincec5260 2 года назад +2

    Nice mate :) :) Too bad about the rules :(

    • @WayneHansen
      @WayneHansen  2 года назад +2

      Yeah, they're a mess.

    • @vincec5260
      @vincec5260 2 года назад +2

      @@WayneHansen :( :( :( Thanks for being honest! :)

  • @dennissvitak6453
    @dennissvitak6453 2 года назад +1

    This entire map is a disaster. I am just ...gobsmacked on how pathetic an effort this is.

  • @BrianMarcus-nz7cs
    @BrianMarcus-nz7cs 10 месяцев назад

    Thats a shame , would shuffling the names about help ,,,, i understand your sentiment m8 it should be accurate and not feel insulting,,,

  • @dennissvitak6453
    @dennissvitak6453 2 года назад +1

    Kansas City, in REALITY, is SOUTH of Denver, as far as latitude.. The map is complete bullsh!t. Kansas City is also EAST of Dallas...again, wrong on the map. It's like someone with a "D" in geography was given a crayon, and ten minutes.

  • @dennissvitak6453
    @dennissvitak6453 2 года назад +1

    Ummm...a big, fat, NOPE on this one. The "Rockies" are located on the map well west of Salt Lake City...like over in the Pacific coast area. This is simply inexcusable. I would, and could, never play this game.