Inventor 101: Linear Stress Analysis

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
  • In part 20 of the Autodesk Inventor 101: The Basics series, we'll take a look at how to setup a linear stress analysis using Inventor Simulation, as well as how to interpret results.
    Part 1: bit.ly/2pY5YW6
    Part 2: bit.ly/2IzS3gp
    Part 3: bit.ly/2uDlueP
    Part 4: bit.ly/2GNdkSA
    Part 5: bit.ly/2IYRV9O
    Part 6: bit.ly/2Fa1BvE
    Part 7: bit.ly/2JDGAMw
    Part 8: bit.ly/2IgMRki
    Part 9: bit.ly/2rFYPur
    Part 10: bit.ly/2IznfA7
    Part 11: bit.ly/2wXR0oR
    Part 12: bit.ly/2kN0A59
    Part 13: bit.ly/2sN1iUi
    Part 14: bit.ly/2JvbjQe
    Part 15: bit.ly/2K89Qjh
    Part 16: bit.ly/2KGkJVN
    Part 17: bit.ly/2KVk3za
    Part 18: bit.ly/2mngILw
    Part 19: bit.ly/2L5sBUZ
    Follow along with the book: amzn.to/2GGjOmU

Комментарии • 11

  • @remomagalhaes4707
    @remomagalhaes4707 3 года назад +17

    I bet my naval architecture students will like this video!!

    • @denisnascimento2767
      @denisnascimento2767 3 года назад +1

      Of course, professor! I'm so glad that you're focusing on teaching us all of this :D

    • @Yelori
      @Yelori 3 года назад

      Hey man

  • @aimlessweasel
    @aimlessweasel 5 лет назад +1

    This newer video (also from Autodesk Inventor) is somewhat better, and at least covers more features: ruclips.net/video/gqAZvSV8oDo/видео.html

  • @aimlessweasel
    @aimlessweasel 5 лет назад +5

    Your mesh is too coarse to properly analyze the bending in the center beam. There need to be two layers of mesh elements, as the neutral axis should have zero stress (plus a minimal amount of tension in your case since you fixed both ends instead of having one frictionless). You can tell the mid-point nodes were on, which gives some hint of the distribution, but it is not accurate. It could have easily been used as a demonstration of when you need to refine the mesh (you even mention checking to see if it is fine enough when it is *literally* the textbook example of it not being), how to do it, and then also look at the singularity at the inside corners where it will never converge. Perhaps even point out the rule of thumb that if your deflection is greater than 10% of the beam thickness that you should question the accuracy of the linear solver and consider non-linear analysis. There is so little information in this video it seems irresponsible. People think that if you run an FEA then that is "the" answer, but it is important to remember the limitations and assumptions inherent in the model. You need to do better than this.

  • @sergiof1lg
    @sergiof1lg 6 лет назад

    amazing

  • @vinhtuong7198
    @vinhtuong7198 5 лет назад

    I can belive analysis software? I check version Inventor 2014 & Inventor 2019 get different results

    • @vinhtuong7198
      @vinhtuong7198 5 лет назад

      I think automatic results in Inventor not good

    • @henrychan720
      @henrychan720 3 года назад

      @@vinhtuong7198 Check your mesh resolution. Also make sure your deformations are small and your constraints and loads are applied correctly. If you need more than linear FEA, get the Nastran plugin.

  • @user-od9sl8uo4e
    @user-od9sl8uo4e 6 лет назад

    Кaк сделaть подвижную опору?