@@NahreSol Chessy involves A) a goal B) an assortment of tools to achieve it C) the knowledge that some tools yields greater results D) the decision to rely only on the most effective of them.
@@tweer64 Yeah, but honestly I feel like that's more of a credit than anything. It's cheesy now, but kind of brilliant that he created something that became so ubiquitous. I used to hate it, but when I heard him explain how he came up with it it kind of blew my mind.
A helpful category here is "kitsch." A kitsch is cheesy, but typically knowingly cheesy and pursued/performed because it is just fun. Kitsch movements are often helpful counterpoints to formalist movements ("Hey, art can just be about having a good laugh, too").
To be fair to him, it is often played in a very over-emotive way. However, it's a bit of a deep cut to be taking a stab at when raindrop prelude and funeral march exist.
I think there is alot of class information involved in what is cheesy according to who. A lot of times, "cheesy" is used by musicians among themselves or by critics to denigrate unsophisticated mass appeal, in order to reaffirm the distinction between the undiscerning masses and the discerning artists/critics/sophisticates. Though anyone with an intimate and hard earned familiarity with any style of music hates to see cheese ruin a subtle piece of music by erasing it's subtlety. Or see the beauty of restraint obliterated my overplaying or maximizing. This is really a rather tricky question since cheese is such a catchall term like you mention.
Exactly, I'm 100% convinced that one cannot understand music from a holistic approach if the discussion surrounding politics is not involved. A lot of music criticism has something to do with politics and musical taste has been class-dependent through the course of history.
Key phrase: "A lot of times." Like, I have a hard time imagining mainstream hip-hop today being labeled cheesy, despite hip-hop being one of the most (the most?) widely denigrated musics, and of course that has connections with class. On the other hand, I have a very EASY time recognizing the outright cheese of some 80s/90s hip-hop. Same genre, similar class associations, different eras. To me it seems that cheese is strongly associated with the sense of something being outdated. Like a negative form of nostalgia. And being into outdated things, not "being with the times," may be percieved as lower class (in a cultural rather than economic sense) WITHIN a given community.
@@elbschwartz Beware that if one labels the Hip-Hop movement in that insulting way, it can also be a form of racism. I strongly believe that Hip Hop has been the most important form of modern music since 1973. If one doesn't get its importance in the history of music, s/he will have a really hard time understanding modern music from a holistic approach.
@@Bati_ Have **I** labeled hip-hop in an insulting way? I am just describing a general perception. For example, it's only in recent years that hip-hop/rap has begun to be seriously studied by musicologists/music theorists. Why? Certainly racism has something to do with it. I fail to see how I am being racist for pointing that out.
Cheesiness is so intricately tied to pop culture and familiarity, so much so that it becomes subjective almost entirely based on the amount of musical exposure one has. I would say the the i-iv-i or i-ii-i are NOT cheesy to most "laypeople", but they are to professional musicians who have (as he admitted) seen and played all over the place.
I'd like to add to the plethora of opinions by suggesting a more practical approach: Do you know how there's some video games that lets a player use a particular move that drastically improves his chances of winning? If the player knowingly makes this his only resource to achieve their goal you can declare that they are in fact 'Cheesing it'. This makes really easy to understand what is 'Cheesy'. It involves A) a goal B) an assortment of tools to achieve it C) the knowledge that some tools yields greater results D) the decision to rely only on the most effective of them.
If no goal was defined, then you might end with something corny or of a lesser quality. If you have a goal but there's only one way to achieve it then you are just 'Doing it'. If you have a set of different tools but all are equally effective then we can only disagree to the stylistic choice but that revolves around personal opinion, and finally if you don't rely on a singular tool and explore all the creative options at your disposal... I guarantee the result won't be cheesy.
yeah, in divinity its cheesy to fill up a chest until its heavy enough to one shot anything when you drop it on enemies, because it doesn't require much effort after the initial idea I think you get "cheesy" when you choose something that takes the least amout of effort to achieve your goal going for an emotion you want the listener to have is in some contexts an easy way out of having to feel your own, and so is hiding behind a "performer" persona that expresses fake and over-exagerated emotion when interpreting music
There is an anecdote in John Cage's "Silence" where he witnesses some master musician listen to a pretty bad performance of a mediocre piece, and totally enjoying it. Cage asks "why" and the master explains that you have to distinguish between the quality of the material, of the performance, and of the intention/sincerity of the performer. I think Zimmer was on it when he said "unearned emotion". In Cage's terms that's the sincerity lacking.
wtf, wait? you are literally mates with Zimmer amongst others. you are very talented, i'm not sure why this was a surprise. great stuff! cheese! (cheers)
Your "cheesy" Bach was still beautiful though, and I'd love to hear more of it! Romanticized Bach is generally great and deserves more love, I'd argue.
I grew up listening to Wanda Landowska (Harpsichord) and Virgil Fox (organ) and my study scores were the Busoni Edition. Still better than the "Typewriter style" Bach playing that nowadays is considered "historically correct"!
@@andresgunther not an HIP cukoo myself but the HIP keyboardist all but do typewriter à la Gould, they use rythmic manipulation and free ornementation because their history books tell them to
@@rayancharafeddine4982 Maybe it's pedantic, but In my experience, people who study HIP (historically informed practice) usually go to primary sources rather than history books. Things like treatises on how to play keyboard music or reviews of performances written at the time. And yes, they did not advocate for perfectly literal interpretations of the written rhythms. The way they talked about manipulating rhythm was different from how it was talked about in the romantic era and later though, which is why a lot of people have been erroneously told to play Baroque and sometimes Classical era music perfectly straight. In this video, Nahre says not to play the melody separate from the bass, but rolling chords is a very common expressive tool in harpsichord music (rolled chords seem louder).
in my opinion: making music (or any art, really) is a balance act between following a culture and bringing something new to the table. "cheesy" is when something is perceived as not bringing enough new things to the table, when it's sticking to the script of the culture too closely. edit: but at the same time, it has to be acknowledged that 'cheesy' is sometimes used to be like "oh those uneducated masses don't know anything good even if it hits them in the face"
The problem with the concept of "cheesy" is the same as the concept of taste or tastelessness. It is so subjective, and changes all the time with culture and context. There is a desire to put down what other people enjoy as bad taste, putting it into a category of lower class things, but different people take a different extreme to the point where some would dismiss Chopin and all Romantic era composers as cheesy and bad taste in favor of more modern music which they would see as more complex and mature. And then there's people that love Romantic music, and will look down on film music or pop classical as cheesy, and so on. We can't control what affects us emotionally, so just listen to the music that you honestly enjoy, even if it's mostly cheesy Disney musicals.
I think one of the great things about this video was that it DID NOT put whole genres into or excluded from "Cheesy"- except for perhaps Disney pap. (And, imo, Disco.)
I used to work nights at a place where we took turns playing our favorite cassettes, and one night we listened to Kenny G. For every song, I thought, oh, this is an instrumental interpretation of some romantic ballad on the radio, and I just couldn't remember the words for any of them. I was actually shocked when afterwards I looked at the case and saw that all of the songs were his original music. That led me to think about what "cheesy" really means in music, because Kenny G is the prime exemplar. Even though I had never heard most of the tunes before, everything sounded weirdly familiar in an uncanny valley sort of way. Is that because it was so formulaic? I'm not sure.
i’ve you’ve wandered any department store or mall or building that plays “elevator music” then you’ve heard Kenny G. Maybe that’s why it was familiar but not..?
Apart from the musical stuff, I gotta say the video editing is soooo classy... How, the different footages are cut and placed was really interesting IMO.
Some of those things I would call "corny" rather than "cheesy". I wonder whether there's an overlap (or even whether I'm right about the being a distinction). I'd put the emotional things under "cheesy" and the cliché under "corny". So iv-I fits under both. (And let's not forget that every cliché was once original and creative.)
Yes, I think this distinction/overlap between "cheesy" and "corny" is really interesting - and, as a german, I wonder where/how native english speakers would pidgeonhole the word "kitsch" in that context.
In german, the word "kitsch" means "cheap art that is overindulgingly sedimental and therefore not really art". It gets complicated when thinking of cheesy/corny/kitschy as deliberate aesthetics, but when just broadly using these categories for an artwork as a product, I would say: art wants to express, kitsch wants to sell.
See also "schmaltz" and its cousin "schlock." Hans Zimmer validated how I've always summarized it: "sentiment, versus sensation." But then in the closing moments you bring in the word "Quality" - as in, the Robert Pirsig, "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"/"Lila" use of the term? Lots more to be explored there!
I heard a conservatory student's piece written in honor of Leonard Bernstein. It felt like an elaborate karaoke song, and called him an affectionate nickname, but done so earnestly I couldn't help but let it transcend its cheese.
I agree with another commenter here; I think you kinda gotta be familiar with the music to find it cheesy because you have to know conventions and cliches, etc. It’s kinda like language-some of my German friends love English puns (genuinely find them hilarious) or find our idioms interesting. Some English speakers love dad jokes, full of puns, but others roll their eyes. As was said in the video, nostalgia and sentimental affectation make something cheesy too. I think this is one of the reasons it can be hard to make a part of the classical repertoire sound like your own, as well; how do you put yourself into the music without also forcing a contrived “emotionality” to it and not betraying the piece?
What a great subject. I've thought about this a lot and I think it's related to what I call the Ironic-Earnest spectrum. On one side you have purely earnest music, like the emotional and raw folk ballads of Leonard Cohen, and on the other side there is purely ironic and self-aware music like Frank Zappa's "Don't Eat the Yellow Snow" which is basically meaningless but very self-aware. Cheese is like a line 90 degrees from this spectrum. It pretends to be earnest but it's actually manufactured to pull on your heart strings almost against your will. In this way, it is neither ironic nor earnest. It's trying very hard to make you feel something, but it (or the artist) isn't actually feeling anything, AND they are not self-aware about that.
I disagree - I think someone can be totally earnest and still make cheesy music, or any other kind of "art". For example, this often happens in religious stuff, I think.
Cheesy is definitely not always a bad thing. Aimer has a lot of songs with these big, bombastic, emotional moments where the song breaks into loud, slow drums, and romantic strings or heavy guitar. I know when they’re coming, I know what they’re going for, and I still fall for it. Great music. “Dawn” and “re:frain” are good examples of this.
What Ema Nikolovska says about superficially cheesy material presented in an "ironic" way is so good. You have the base layer, where the cheesy music manipulates the emotions in a transparent way, then you have a layer above that, which addresses the social meaning of that manipulation. A related example would be to ingratiate oneself by deliberately being embarrassing.
Thank you, Nahre, for the hard work you've put into making this video. It really contains tons of invaluable information. I'm always learning so much from every video you make. I always have to watch every video you make for five times or more because they're so informative. I've just watched like a whole masterclass on how not to sound cheesy in about 12 minutes. You are such a great teacher. Thank you!
As a music lover who's also trying to make his own music, I feel that this is a very legitimate question to ask ourselves (and so far the video was very interesting, as always!), but the more I hear what some people define as cheesy, the more I feel that no description can really provide a "recipe" on how to identify and avoid what's cheesy and what's not.. I feel like trying too hard to answer this question may push me away from the music that I truly enjoy and what I may end up creating. Am I the only one who feels like this? Should we just focus on what feels good and "authentic" to us?
For musical growth it might be helpful as well to listen to music you don't initially enjoy and analyse it. It might grow on you and expand your musical vocabulary and if not, you might learn to identify and avoid the elements you dislike when creating your own music.
You can find cheesiness in most stage piano demos where they use sustain full pedal for every single note. They’d use it for the presenter voice if they could. The good intention part is to show up the max polyphony of the instrument, but many times it’s to distract listener from simplicity of the sound it’s supposed to make without much effort.
I think there are two things that are incredibly important to being a good artist: knowing what you like and getting feedback. If you don't know what you like, you can never make something that is honest and true to yourself. If you never seek feedback, you will never understand how your music is received and if you're making good on what you would like to deliver. To answer your question, something that this video displays really well is that cheesiness is incredibly subjective. Everyone has a different opinion of what makes something cheesy and sometimes it doesn't even matter that something is cheesy. I would say, similarly to someone above, that you should listen to music that you find cheesy to understand why you think it is such. Then you can make a conscious decision on whether or not to employ those things and if so, when and where. If something sounds good to you, do not abandon it. If you get feedback from a lot of people telling you that they don't like it, then you can weigh their experience against your intention and experience and decide if it should change.
I mean, I'm also just a beginner in making music, but yeah, I usually just go with what feels good and authentic to me without really thinking too much of whether it's cheesy. Like people said in the video, it can also be completely fine, just don't stagnate in your musical development and use the same techniques every time. Learn, improve, experiment, and you'll have a great time ahead of you ;-)
@@kasane1337 we are all beginners, because we learn as we go continuously. At the end .. cheesy or not .. what matters is what you present with your music “birds sing several melodies and arrange together without a single music class” ;) enjoy your day
Great video ! Very interesting subject! I would personally add another dimension to your already quite complete analysis, which is the societal dimension of the perception. In fact I think that a lot of what we percieve as good/bad taste is also based on quite trivial elements about us: our age, our background, but also our whealth, our education, personnal history, habits,... And that to some extent, our perception of what is good/bad music is also based on what we reject as "non-valid" music and that can reaaly change in different social circles. I think intersting to take these elements into account when dealing with those subjects. Love your videos !
When the Beatles recorded "I am the walrus", John Lennon asked George Martin for the arrangements to "make it cheese". George Martin translated the request as adding a lot of strings.
I just discovered you tonight - I hope to see a lot more of you. You are a breath of fresh air to me. With all that reference to cheesiness, you've whetted my appetite for a pitza - I'm going to the kitchen right now to put one in the oven. Wish you were here and hope to see you soon.
In classical music there is so much fear of playing / singing too "cheesy" and as a consequence, everyone is playing so restricted, etude-like and robotic. I wonder where this comes from. Perhaps it's Strawinsky's classizistic style which many people misunderstood as the "real classical style" (which it isn't!)
I think it comes from having recordings that can be listened to over and over. And from a change in artistic culture of all sorts that resulted from WWI and WWII.
Ha! The Balance is the God! ( not robotic and not cheesy ) The hardest! The taste! The ability to understand right and because of that, to feel right and to express.
@@margaritadolukhanova3878 Haha, yes that's right :-) But I think, when everyone is playing in such a restricted manner and in constant fear of giving to much room for emotions - some should just let their emotions go where they want to go and balance all this strictness out ^^
Thats what I like about your approach to investigate and explain the subject matter of your video's you use many different musical people from all walks of life, instruments, forms of music styles, and wonderful video with text to explain and inform. There is an Honest Brilliance to your teaching method's which is why I have now become a Patron .
"Cheesy", "uncool", "kitsch" and so on... terms that are inherently impossible to define and depend heavily on the cultural context. For this reason, they are the perfect words for tribal talk. They are used with a clear goal: establishing a sense of belonging to a community and exclude someone else from it. They emerge from fear of being outcasts and should not be used by responsible, grown-up artists.
For me, cheesiness has something to do with quotes like "does a swan dress up?" or "a true king never calls himself a king". If you sugarcoat a piece, and try to tell to the audience too hard to notice something, it will come out cheesy. It's about presentation.
I think 'Cheesy' essentially means focusing on nothing but the surface level of the music. When pianists play with full pedal, focus on only the melody, pretentiously trying to sound more emotional, other pianists will be able to tell. And they won't like it. But people who have no understanding of classical music will find it touching. I think especially this difference between 'understanding the music' and only 'feeling the music' is what makes things cheesy. You call things cheesy when they seem to be liked only by those who enjoy music on a surface level, but truly have no deeper interest in it. This is also the reason there's so much toxicity around the term. I personally think enjoying cheesy music is completely fine and fun. But optimally, you have some awareness of it.
You don't need to be a musician to notice the cheese. The cheese is all about being unsubtle, a good portion of the population, maybe 1/5, can notice when you're trying too hard to elicit a certain emotion onto the listener and even predict when you're going to start with the cheese and what you're going to do after.
@@MaxIronsThird The musician was rather an example. If you have deeper interest in the music, you can tell. It's only when people say they are total fans, without realizing the cheesy-ness, when it starts to seem... inauthentic. You can be a fan of cheese, but you should optimally know it is cheese.
Cheesy is also a function of music you are familiar with/grew up on. Orchestral music is not something I grew up on, so some of the things that are nostalgic or pull on the heart strings are in fact new sounds to me. The iv chord in the rachmaninoff example feels honest and genuine, painful and raw, but playing rhythmically in a mixolydian mode feels cheesy because it feels like old rock to me. It feels outdated and pandering, because that is the music I know. To those that do not study the lineage of classical music, some of those cheesy things are genuinely enjoyable, simply because it's not an overused cliche if it hasn't been used on you.
Fascinating to have Hans Zimmer in there. I'd say Zimmer is great because he's not cheesy, and John Williams is great because he _is_ cheesy. (Although I think that cheese came close to ruining Schindler's List near the end...)
I don't know. I've always found Zimmer's music to be kinda cheesy when it isn't just cold, whereas Williams can move me to tears with hardly any effort, and I _welcome_ it, too.
One of the big reasons I love watching this channel is that I never know where a particular video study is going to go. Today's was wonderfully lighthearted as well as being informative!
To me, the definition of cheesy music is all of the Casio keyboard demos on the keyboards that teach you how to play songs by making the keys light up. It's the way they're arranged, and the instrument sounds they choose, especially how they add trumpet sounds to stuff that totally shouldn't have it.
Thank you very much Nahre!! This was an interesting look at what exactly people consider cheesy. I've had a conversation like this before with my band director, back when I was in high school, and no matter who I seemed to ask it allows met something different. I listen to every genre of music, because music is awesome, and I think that every genre has what can be called 'cheese', but perhaps that's what gives the genre its characteristic. Or maybe I'm just trying to come up with a clever reason for why we may perceive cheese. I do think that the way you describe cheesy is also very dependent on your musical ability, yet I think this comment is long enough, haha. Thank you once for making such fantastic content, hope you are doing well!
> the way you describe cheesy is also very dependent on your musical ability 100%. I actually thought the romanticized Bach was like ok even though it's not what Bach intended. It didn't seem "cheesy" to me, more like if Bach had lived in the romantic era but still wrote with baroque patterns.
In my daily dive into learning music theory and daws and all the associated stuff you popped up in the RUclips Algorithm, and I loved this! So glad i watched and now am a fan. Like a billion questions type of fan! But I'll try to be brief. From your dive into Debussy (who I love) Ghibli, which I now intend to watch, into your foray with LoFi, which somehow hooked me..Is there a cheese to LoFI and why? Is simple cheesy? So often less is more, right? In part 1 you clearly got the sensation and satisfying feel of the genre, and part 2 the vibe solidified! And last thought..I feel all three previously mentioned evoke a nostalgic, warm, feel. Maybe cheesy is also comforting? And, WOW! Hans Zimmer is a friend.. cool stuff, look forward to more.
Very cool Nahre! Love all the legit interviews! This whole video feels like hallway discussions from college, especially with all the artists you interviewed! Brava!!!
What a fantastic video! Hans Zimmers, score for "Gladiator" was fantastic! He and the exotic voice of Lisa Gerard really set the mood. 2:28 This is the first time I've ever heard "Pachelbel Canon", Chopin and "Sugar Sugar" described in the same way- which makes me think of another possible factor in deciding whether something is "Cheesy", one's knowledge of the genre. While I agreed with all of the pop music cited as "Cheesy", and have myself railed against Michael Bolton, Kenny G, and all the over-the-top vocal performances of most modern pop singers (especially the females), I never would have thought of Pachelbel Canon or Chopin as cheesy. I'm a HUGE JS Bach fan, and for me, that example really drove home what you mean regarding classical music. Thanks you so much.
Could we see 'cheesy' as a familiar translation of 'ostentatious'? An over-insistent and annoying display... Which would not mean then that the thing in question is lacking, but it could be so: an ostentatious display of a quality that is either there or partially or totally absent. Cheesiness-ostentation is then presumed by the observer, is easily detectable when the quality so displayed is absent, but is more of a subjective judgment when the quality is present. This would join with the sincerity aspect discussed by many in the video. It would also mean that this is not high art frowning down on popular art. Popular music can indeed be cheesy but is not necessarily so. And classical music or its interpretation can indeed be ostentatious. I think that this is where Nahre and others are getting at in the observations on Chopin. Even the great, in pursuit of ever more greatness, is flirting with cheesiness. To cheese or not to cheese...
To me, saying something is cheesy is always a projection of vanity - it means a person is saying to others ‘I’m too good for this music’ or ‘I’m embarassed by this music’ which is a pretty despicable attitude really in any art form.
I once gave a lesson on “Cheesy Modulation”, where I showed how to modulate between 2 keys (slices of bread) using 1 chord (the cheese). The cheese helped remember!
Borderline cheesy can be sublime. Considering Hans Zimmer is in this video, consider the main theme from The Crown, especially when it is used to punctuate the end of episodes, including the first episode. It's just a bunch of rowboats slowly heading out for a duck hunt in the fog, but the roaring horn and thundering strings make it compelling in a way I could see a lot of people pooh-poohing, but I love it.
What a fascinating video, Nahre. Thank you. In my experience, cheesy isn’t always describing the composition, though it often does. On the contrary, a performance can be cheesy, even if the original is brilliant.
1:16 Oh, I like this! There's a particular way of using the word "sentimental" that I associate with the Russians...and I really *feel* what they mean when they say it, but I couldn't ever put it into other words. "Inauthentic, unearned emotion" might just be it! I think Satie is cheesy. Some of his cheese is good cheese though! He makes a lot of stinky cheese that I like to take in small bites every once in awhile. Just not too much all at once or it looses its "zing." 😊
i think a big part of what’s “cheesy” is familiarity, or lack of originality. if you know what’s coming next, if something is too expected and/or overdone, it becomes “cheesy” or “cliché.” hence why a lot of experienced musicians who have a greater repertoire of knowledge in more obscure pieces might consider overly mainstream pieces such as “river flows in you” to be very “cheesy,” when the general public might find it incredibly moving. It’s interesting because many pieces weren’t considered to be “cheesy” until it trended on tiktok and/or it became more mainstream (such as clair de lune) - so a lot of it can also be a musician’s superiority complex to solidify their “niche” as someone who isn’t “basic.” another example of the familiarity concept is when you know too much of the intention behind how the musician is trying to convey emotion, such as overdone expressions (lang lang is a great example of who many consider to be “cheesy”) and an overly flowery/romantic style of play - hence why a lot of people describe it as “trying too hard,” when it might just be because you expected and/or understood the intention behind what they were trying to do too much.
I do think that cheese is underrated. We are taught to devalue our emotions, to be too serious, and there is a place for unashamed sentimentality. "For well you know that it's a fool who plays it cool. By making his world a little colder", as Paul McCartney* sang. Where the feeling is authentic, and the performer is inviting the audience to share it, it can be a joyous experience. * Not John Lennon.
5:50 - omg yes. I remember in the 2000s synthesizers were considered the diabolus in musica basically. Just not pleasant, uncanny. Though of course they were used! They just weren’t used nearly as overtly in pop music as now, now that the 80s are easier to look back on with distance.
hot take: What you hear as cheasy or not is entirely subjective and one probably shouldn't care how other people perceive ones personal artistic expression :D
This makes me wonder about whether making cheesy music is also influenced by whether a musician (especially an amateur one) has a community or not. When you make music on your own without proper education and community, there's no one to validate your music. When you like something you make, you may not be aware that it's cheesy (and the other way around, you may think that your composition is cheesy but actually it's not). I think music community helps musicians learn and get a sense of what's cheesy and what's not, and how they can improve their way of creating something cool through music. (Yea this comment might be a lil personal lol) Anw awesome content as always! Sincerely, A fan from Indonesia
Also depends on the community. There are always echo chambers within communities that perpetualizing stereotypes & cheesiness. In the end it depends on the individual, whether he/she willing to grows out of the echo chamber to notice the cliche/cheesiness of the musical community.
Cheese is making surface level music that relies on stereotypes and emotional manipulation, it's also a favorite buzzword of pretentious and over-achieving musicians.
When I did my orchestration of "Beren and Lúthien", for the counter-melody behind line: "about him cast her shadowy hair and arms like silver glimmering", I cranked up the sentimental strings to the max, for romantic effect. But only that time, mind!
Great video, thank you so much! I think there is a big key in the text that was shown but not said, about the performing of a famous canadian singer... 0:56 I really love cheesy quotes with humorous effect, as in the improvisations of Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Sonny Rollins, Dexter Gordon...
I like how Nahre asked "What is cheesy? Do we apply the word to express our opinions or to attribute specific musical qualities?" Can't this be asked of every aesthetic term? Maybe even emotive ones like "sad". Does the music make me feel sad or, moreover, is *the* music sad in some sense? Obviously the music isn't feeling sadness because it isn't a mind. But... maybe there is something objective about sadness in music!
Very thorough and thought through video! Great! IMHO Jeff Schneider nails it. It's pretentious music played by people who are simply not up to it. Like those piano embellishments that sound way more complicated than they are, clumsily played. Have a good pianist play it and it becomes much less cheesy. The same goes for compositions. If a composer/arranger wants to sound big and emotional, but only knows simple triads and dominant seventh chords - and even screws them up with things like redundant thirds or unnecessary fifths, not knowing elegant drop voicings and smooth voice leading. On the other hand: those 1950s through 1970s advertising jingles were mostly arranged and sung by very skilled musicians and very often had beautiful jazz chord voicings - that's why I don't find them cheesy.
A couple of quibbles, especially around Bach, and the type of instrument to be used. The pianoforte was invented after Bach died. The keyboard instruments he had were harpsichords, clavichords, or organs, only one of which had any organic dynamic response (clavichords), and the harpsichord was the premiere concert instrument, and it is the epitome of a thin tinny piano. Second, the only way a performer could add emphasis was with difference in tempo, rubato, etc., which Bach (in)famously rarely marked in his scores, meaning it isn't required but it isn't prohibited either. Most of Bach's expressiveness is actually harmonic and contrapuntal in nature, which is why it easily can be transcribed between everything between a Moog Synthesizer, crude computer beep generator, to the Swingle Singers.
Mostly agree except Bach did have in his later years occasion to play several new examples of Silbermann's fortepianos at the Court of Frederick the Great and composed The Musical Offering series (published in 1747) following that experience.
Bach was born 1685. Cristofiori invented the pianoforte in 1698, when Bach was 13 years old. By 1750 (when Bach died) the pianoforte had already been perfected by some notable builders, specifically his exact contemporary Gottfried Silbermann. Bach played on Silbermann's earlier pianofortes and criticized their heavy action and poor treble. The master didn't take that well and had a run-in with Bach, but ultimately improved his fortepianos, and Bach selected (and played on) a Silbermann pianoforte for Frederik the Great in 1749. By the way: The English title "Well Tempered Harpsichord" is mistranslated; the original title "Das Wohltemperierte Clavier" means literally "The well tempered Keyboard Instrument" although Bach preferred the harpsichord as instrument of choice.
Just make sure they come from your heart, and they will work. There’s not any kind of music for everyone’s liking, anyways, so don’t worry for leaving someone “outside”, and if there’s some mistakes now, just keep trying and you’ll grow fine in due time.
The most concise definiton of cheese is when the fourth wall of performance is broken in listeners/watchers mind by thoughts outside of context of media experienced. So for an example, your playing bach 'romanticized' is not cheesy, unless listeners notice, the choice to make it sound nuanced (or whatever they may say impacted the performance) was made by you. The reasons of course can be many and various as it's subjective but the objective core stays the same.
It really does seem like it has many layers, sometimes I hear certain sound-design such as a lot of 80's fm synths and find those cheesy, even though they're not sappy or anything along those lines. Then there's associations we make to things other than the music itself influencing it further, and sometimes we don't mind certain kinds of cheese, for a lot of people these become guilty pleasures. I don't feel shame, but those 80's synths are an example that sometimes just work for me.
5:33 - Fashion, Art & Design - I am glad you made these comparisons - I would take it even further, as Cheese/Cheesy can be applied as a subjective assessment of similar criteria in any meta-game strategy
The problem with popular music is marketing, which, due to the rules of consumption, wants art to be made like aspirin, one bestseller one after another. That's why we got it into our heads that the old is useless because it's old (explain it to me with classical music). However, anyone makes art (to the best of their ability) for a social environment that is common to them. The theme is diffusion, who decides what music or what art is seen and what benefit that product brings
To me, an important part of what makes something cheesy, whether this is directly noticeable or not, is a lack of sincerety. If something is truly sincere, it cannot be cheesy. For example, I don't believe a single emotion from Steve Perry, so most of his singing that leans into his faux-emotive style is especially cheesy to me. I don't think that's the only thing, because there's a lot of things I see that I also consider faux-emotion that aren't necessarily cheesy. Also, I have noticed that it's much harder to write a happy song that isn't cheesy, it so often feels false. I was impressed by Pharrell Williams' "Happy" because it feels like such a genuine expression of happiness that I couldn't read it as cheesy.
This was a fantastic way of edifying us on the word CHESSY because of the varied view points and out looks of the assorted company of friends. (I am of the view point that CHESSY are things not done that well, but make us laugh or cringe because it's just CHESSY) keep up the good work Kind regards from Worrell Robinson.
I think additionally in pop/rock sometimes the cheese comes from vocal delivery style and visuals as well, like corny old music videos with hammy acting and musical-theater-style vocals.
Funny, it's one of those things that we often don't give much thought, and yet somehow we all have such a similar grasp of the idea of something being "cheesy" (even if we may not agree about what exactly falls into that category). Great video!
If it's not very gouda and the emotion is not very brie-lievable?
😂😂😂
I cheese what you did there.
@@NahreSol Chessy involves A) a goal B) an assortment of tools to achieve it C) the knowledge that some tools yields greater results D) the decision to rely only on the most effective of them.
Who gave you Parmesan to make this puns?
you munster
casually asking ur friend hans zimmer about cheese hahah
the biggest musical flex
Id be very cheesed to meet him
Didn’t he inadvertently invent one of the most cheesy tactics in film scoring (Inception horn).
@@tweer64 Yeah, but honestly I feel like that's more of a credit than anything. It's cheesy now, but kind of brilliant that he created something that became so ubiquitous. I used to hate it, but when I heard him explain how he came up with it it kind of blew my mind.
@@tweer64 milk isn't born cheesy
"Let's talk to some of my musician friends to know what cheesy is for them."
**literally brings out THE Hans Zimmer**
I was at first in disbelief.
The BWAAAAH man himself
Exactly
Ikr!
what a flex
I just love how you're casually interviewing the greatest musicians out there. Another great video, thanks!
That's what I was thinking. She's literally on a first name basis with freaking Hans Zimmer!!
Is he the greatest?
Eliades Ochoa? David Hildalgo? Keith Jarrett?
To me, cheesiness is almost a test of patience because of how familiar we are with what comes next.
Ahh interesting !
Yes, predictability is a component. Making a piece straight unoriginal.
This! Perfect. I have zero patience for it.
A helpful category here is "kitsch." A kitsch is cheesy, but typically knowingly cheesy and pursued/performed because it is just fun. Kitsch movements are often helpful counterpoints to formalist movements ("Hey, art can just be about having a good laugh, too").
Exactly. Cheese is no problem at all. But liking the cheese without knowing that it is cheese, will make you seem inauthentic.
How about schmaltzy?
I'm not a music person so what I got from this comment is that anime is kitsch
This reminds me so much of Milan Kundera
You don't know what kitsch is
Just casually gettin Hans Zimmer to the video, damn Nahre you're a legend, I love your videos, they deal with such complex musical topics
Thank you !!
@@NahreSol How did you do it??
Hans: I'm worried why Nahre is asking me this.
The king of "cheap" movie scoring, boring after Gladiator.
@@Ninejahman if his works are cheap, then your existence can be considered almost worthless
My man really called one of Chopin's most harmonically complex etudes "cheesy" and made my head pop clean off.
I NEED to hear that justification.
I think the comment was justifiable only on the basis that some performances are cheesy, rather than the music itself.
To be fair to him, it is often played in a very over-emotive way. However, it's a bit of a deep cut to be taking a stab at when raindrop prelude and funeral march exist.
@@edwardjons8684 actually 1000% fair
@@edwardjons8684 True but that's like saying Leonard Cohen is cheesy because the thousands of awful covers of Hallelujah
Mozart tho
I think there is alot of class information involved in what is cheesy according to who. A lot of times, "cheesy" is used by musicians among themselves or by critics to denigrate unsophisticated mass appeal, in order to reaffirm the distinction between the undiscerning masses and the discerning artists/critics/sophisticates. Though anyone with an intimate and hard earned familiarity with any style of music hates to see cheese ruin a subtle piece of music by erasing it's subtlety. Or see the beauty of restraint obliterated my overplaying or maximizing. This is really a rather tricky question since cheese is such a catchall term like you mention.
Exactly, I'm 100% convinced that one cannot understand music from a holistic approach if the discussion surrounding politics is not involved. A lot of music criticism has something to do with politics and musical taste has been class-dependent through the course of history.
So critics saying cheesy is critics being "cheesy" because its just too snobbish, vague and lazy without being meaningful?
Key phrase: "A lot of times." Like, I have a hard time imagining mainstream hip-hop today being labeled cheesy, despite hip-hop being one of the most (the most?) widely denigrated musics, and of course that has connections with class. On the other hand, I have a very EASY time recognizing the outright cheese of some 80s/90s hip-hop. Same genre, similar class associations, different eras.
To me it seems that cheese is strongly associated with the sense of something being outdated. Like a negative form of nostalgia. And being into outdated things, not "being with the times," may be percieved as lower class (in a cultural rather than economic sense) WITHIN a given community.
@@elbschwartz Beware that if one labels the Hip-Hop movement in that insulting way, it can also be a form of racism. I strongly believe that Hip Hop has been the most important form of modern music since 1973. If one doesn't get its importance in the history of music, s/he will have a really hard time understanding modern music from a holistic approach.
@@Bati_ Have **I** labeled hip-hop in an insulting way? I am just describing a general perception. For example, it's only in recent years that hip-hop/rap has begun to be seriously studied by musicologists/music theorists. Why? Certainly racism has something to do with it. I fail to see how I am being racist for pointing that out.
Cheesiness is so intricately tied to pop culture and familiarity, so much so that it becomes subjective almost entirely based on the amount of musical exposure one has. I would say the the i-iv-i or i-ii-i are NOT cheesy to most "laypeople", but they are to professional musicians who have (as he admitted) seen and played all over the place.
tbh these progressions are really beautiful by their own, but it seems that even this can be quite subjective
I'd like to add to the plethora of opinions by suggesting a more practical approach: Do you know how there's some video games that lets a player use a particular move that drastically improves his chances of winning? If the player knowingly makes this his only resource to achieve their goal you can declare that they are in fact 'Cheesing it'. This makes really easy to understand what is 'Cheesy'. It involves A) a goal B) an assortment of tools to achieve it C) the knowledge that some tools yields greater results D) the decision to rely only on the most effective of them.
If no goal was defined, then you might end with something corny or of a lesser quality. If you have a goal but there's only one way to achieve it then you are just 'Doing it'. If you have a set of different tools but all are equally effective then we can only disagree to the stylistic choice but that revolves around personal opinion, and finally if you don't rely on a singular tool and explore all the creative options at your disposal... I guarantee the result won't be cheesy.
I agree 100%
This was a perfect example and easy to relate to as I employ cheesy tactics whenever possible in videogames lol
yeah, in divinity its cheesy to fill up a chest until its heavy enough to one shot anything when you drop it on enemies, because it doesn't require much effort after the initial idea
I think you get "cheesy" when you choose something that takes the least amout of effort to achieve your goal
going for an emotion you want the listener to have is in some contexts an easy way out of having to feel your own, and so is hiding behind a "performer" persona that expresses fake and over-exagerated emotion when interpreting music
There is an anecdote in John Cage's "Silence" where he witnesses some master musician listen to a pretty bad performance of a mediocre piece, and totally enjoying it. Cage asks "why" and the master explains that you have to distinguish between the quality of the material, of the performance, and of the intention/sincerity of the performer. I think Zimmer was on it when he said "unearned emotion". In Cage's terms that's the sincerity lacking.
wtf, wait?
you are literally mates with Zimmer amongst others.
you are very talented, i'm not sure why this was a surprise.
great stuff!
cheese! (cheers)
She’s not just very talented but literally one of the hardest working and most skilled pianists in the world.
Mates? or he let her have an interview? Celb worship is over rated. If you present you stuff well you can meet almost anyone.
Your "cheesy" Bach was still beautiful though, and I'd love to hear more of it! Romanticized Bach is generally great and deserves more love, I'd argue.
I agree.
I grew up listening to Wanda Landowska (Harpsichord) and Virgil Fox (organ) and my study scores were the Busoni Edition. Still better than the "Typewriter style" Bach playing that nowadays is considered "historically correct"!
@@andresgunther not an HIP cukoo myself but the HIP keyboardist all but do typewriter à la Gould, they use rythmic manipulation and free ornementation because their history books tell them to
Totally! Just a listen of Yudina's Italian Concerto 2nd Movement is enough to prove Hans is wrong here...
@@rayancharafeddine4982 Maybe it's pedantic, but In my experience, people who study HIP (historically informed practice) usually go to primary sources rather than history books. Things like treatises on how to play keyboard music or reviews of performances written at the time.
And yes, they did not advocate for perfectly literal interpretations of the written rhythms.
The way they talked about manipulating rhythm was different from how it was talked about in the romantic era and later though, which is why a lot of people have been erroneously told to play Baroque and sometimes Classical era music perfectly straight.
In this video, Nahre says not to play the melody separate from the bass, but rolling chords is a very common expressive tool in harpsichord music (rolled chords seem louder).
in my opinion: making music (or any art, really) is a balance act between following a culture and bringing something new to the table. "cheesy" is when something is perceived as not bringing enough new things to the table, when it's sticking to the script of the culture too closely.
edit: but at the same time, it has to be acknowledged that 'cheesy' is sometimes used to be like "oh those uneducated masses don't know anything good even if it hits them in the face"
The problem with the concept of "cheesy" is the same as the concept of taste or tastelessness. It is so subjective, and changes all the time with culture and context. There is a desire to put down what other people enjoy as bad taste, putting it into a category of lower class things, but different people take a different extreme to the point where some would dismiss Chopin and all Romantic era composers as cheesy and bad taste in favor of more modern music which they would see as more complex and mature. And then there's people that love Romantic music, and will look down on film music or pop classical as cheesy, and so on. We can't control what affects us emotionally, so just listen to the music that you honestly enjoy, even if it's mostly cheesy Disney musicals.
I think one of the great things about this video was that it DID NOT put whole genres into or excluded from "Cheesy"- except for perhaps Disney pap. (And, imo, Disco.)
I used to work nights at a place where we took turns playing our favorite cassettes, and one night we listened to Kenny G. For every song, I thought, oh, this is an instrumental interpretation of some romantic ballad on the radio, and I just couldn't remember the words for any of them. I was actually shocked when afterwards I looked at the case and saw that all of the songs were his original music. That led me to think about what "cheesy" really means in music, because Kenny G is the prime exemplar. Even though I had never heard most of the tunes before, everything sounded weirdly familiar in an uncanny valley sort of way. Is that because it was so formulaic? I'm not sure.
i’ve you’ve wandered any department store or mall or building that plays “elevator music” then you’ve heard Kenny G. Maybe that’s why it was familiar but not..?
"straight formaggio" will be my new way to describe something cheesy forever
😂
add that to the score. pianissimo, formaggio
Apart from the musical stuff, I gotta say the video editing is soooo classy...
How, the different footages are cut and placed was really interesting IMO.
I just discovered your channel. Keep up the great work!
Some of those things I would call "corny" rather than "cheesy". I wonder whether there's an overlap (or even whether I'm right about the being a distinction). I'd put the emotional things under "cheesy" and the cliché under "corny". So iv-I fits under both. (And let's not forget that every cliché was once original and creative.)
Yes, I think this distinction/overlap between "cheesy" and "corny" is really interesting - and, as a german, I wonder where/how native english speakers would pidgeonhole the word "kitsch" in that context.
In german, the word "kitsch" means "cheap art that is overindulgingly sedimental and therefore not really art". It gets complicated when thinking of cheesy/corny/kitschy as deliberate aesthetics, but when just broadly using these categories for an artwork as a product, I would say: art wants to express, kitsch wants to sell.
In Hip Hop music, it's the corny rapper, not the cheesy rapper.
Context matters...
Yeah, cheesy, corny... square, need a Venn diagram
All this discussion of cheese and corn, now I'm craving nachos...
See also "schmaltz" and its cousin "schlock." Hans Zimmer validated how I've always summarized it: "sentiment, versus sensation." But then in the closing moments you bring in the word "Quality" - as in, the Robert Pirsig, "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"/"Lila" use of the term? Lots more to be explored there!
I heard a conservatory student's piece written in honor of Leonard Bernstein. It felt like an elaborate karaoke song, and called him an affectionate nickname, but done so earnestly I couldn't help but let it transcend its cheese.
wat
mp3 or it didn't happen
I agree with another commenter here; I think you kinda gotta be familiar with the music to find it cheesy because you have to know conventions and cliches, etc.
It’s kinda like language-some of my German friends love English puns (genuinely find them hilarious) or find our idioms interesting. Some English speakers love dad jokes, full of puns, but others roll their eyes.
As was said in the video, nostalgia and sentimental affectation make something cheesy too. I think this is one of the reasons it can be hard to make a part of the classical repertoire sound like your own, as well; how do you put yourself into the music without also forcing a contrived “emotionality” to it and not betraying the piece?
This has been SO instructive! After years of searching, I realize I do have a genre!
What a great subject. I've thought about this a lot and I think it's related to what I call the Ironic-Earnest spectrum. On one side you have purely earnest music, like the emotional and raw folk ballads of Leonard Cohen, and on the other side there is purely ironic and self-aware music like Frank Zappa's "Don't Eat the Yellow Snow" which is basically meaningless but very self-aware. Cheese is like a line 90 degrees from this spectrum. It pretends to be earnest but it's actually manufactured to pull on your heart strings almost against your will. In this way, it is neither ironic nor earnest. It's trying very hard to make you feel something, but it (or the artist) isn't actually feeling anything, AND they are not self-aware about that.
I disagree - I think someone can be totally earnest and still make cheesy music, or any other kind of "art". For example, this often happens in religious stuff, I think.
Cheesy is definitely not always a bad thing. Aimer has a lot of songs with these big, bombastic, emotional moments where the song breaks into loud, slow drums, and romantic strings or heavy guitar. I know when they’re coming, I know what they’re going for, and I still fall for it. Great music. “Dawn” and “re:frain” are good examples of this.
What Ema Nikolovska says about superficially cheesy material presented in an "ironic" way is so good. You have the base layer, where the cheesy music manipulates the emotions in a transparent way, then you have a layer above that, which addresses the social meaning of that manipulation. A related example would be to ingratiate oneself by deliberately being embarrassing.
Thank you, Nahre, for the hard work you've put into making this video. It really contains tons of invaluable information. I'm always learning so much from every video you make. I always have to watch every video you make for five times or more because they're so informative. I've just watched like a whole masterclass on how not to sound cheesy in about 12 minutes. You are such a great teacher. Thank you!
As a music lover who's also trying to make his own music, I feel that this is a very legitimate question to ask ourselves (and so far the video was very interesting, as always!), but the more I hear what some people define as cheesy, the more I feel that no description can really provide a "recipe" on how to identify and avoid what's cheesy and what's not.. I feel like trying too hard to answer this question may push me away from the music that I truly enjoy and what I may end up creating. Am I the only one who feels like this? Should we just focus on what feels good and "authentic" to us?
For musical growth it might be helpful as well to listen to music you don't initially enjoy and analyse it. It might grow on you and expand your musical vocabulary and if not, you might learn to identify and avoid the elements you dislike when creating your own music.
You can find cheesiness in most stage piano demos where they use sustain full pedal for every single note. They’d use it for the presenter voice if they could. The good intention part is to show up the max polyphony of the instrument, but many times it’s to distract listener from simplicity of the sound it’s supposed to make without much effort.
I think there are two things that are incredibly important to being a good artist: knowing what you like and getting feedback. If you don't know what you like, you can never make something that is honest and true to yourself. If you never seek feedback, you will never understand how your music is received and if you're making good on what you would like to deliver.
To answer your question, something that this video displays really well is that cheesiness is incredibly subjective. Everyone has a different opinion of what makes something cheesy and sometimes it doesn't even matter that something is cheesy. I would say, similarly to someone above, that you should listen to music that you find cheesy to understand why you think it is such. Then you can make a conscious decision on whether or not to employ those things and if so, when and where.
If something sounds good to you, do not abandon it. If you get feedback from a lot of people telling you that they don't like it, then you can weigh their experience against your intention and experience and decide if it should change.
I mean, I'm also just a beginner in making music, but yeah, I usually just go with what feels good and authentic to me without really thinking too much of whether it's cheesy. Like people said in the video, it can also be completely fine, just don't stagnate in your musical development and use the same techniques every time. Learn, improve, experiment, and you'll have a great time ahead of you ;-)
@@kasane1337 we are all beginners, because we learn as we go continuously. At the end .. cheesy or not .. what matters is what you present with your music “birds sing several melodies and arrange together without a single music class” ;) enjoy your day
Great video ! Very interesting subject!
I would personally add another dimension to your already quite complete analysis, which is the societal dimension of the perception. In fact I think that a lot of what we percieve as good/bad taste is also based on quite trivial elements about us: our age, our background, but also our whealth, our education, personnal history, habits,... And that to some extent, our perception of what is good/bad music is also based on what we reject as "non-valid" music and that can reaaly change in different social circles.
I think intersting to take these elements into account when dealing with those subjects.
Love your videos !
When the Beatles recorded "I am the walrus", John Lennon asked George Martin for the arrangements to "make it cheese". George Martin translated the request as adding a lot of strings.
This is hilarious 😂
I just discovered you tonight - I hope to see a lot more of you. You are a breath of fresh air to me. With all that reference to cheesiness, you've whetted my appetite for a pitza - I'm going to the kitchen right now to put one in the oven. Wish you were here and hope to see you soon.
In classical music there is so much fear of playing / singing too "cheesy" and as a consequence, everyone is playing so restricted, etude-like and robotic.
I wonder where this comes from. Perhaps it's Strawinsky's classizistic style which many people misunderstood as the "real classical style" (which it isn't!)
yup
I think it comes from having recordings that can be listened to over and over. And from a change in artistic culture of all sorts that resulted from WWI and WWII.
Ha! The Balance is the God! ( not robotic and not cheesy )
The hardest! The taste! The ability to understand right and because of that, to feel right and to express.
@@margaritadolukhanova3878 Haha, yes that's right :-) But I think, when everyone is playing in such a restricted manner and in constant fear of giving to much room for emotions - some should just let their emotions go where they want to go and balance all this strictness out ^^
Thats what I like about your approach to investigate and explain the subject matter of your video's you use many different musical people from all walks of life, instruments, forms of music styles, and wonderful video with text to explain and inform. There is an Honest Brilliance to your teaching method's which is why I have now become a Patron .
"Cheesy", "uncool", "kitsch" and so on... terms that are inherently impossible to define and depend heavily on the cultural context. For this reason, they are the perfect words for tribal talk. They are used with a clear goal: establishing a sense of belonging to a community and exclude someone else from it. They emerge from fear of being outcasts and should not be used by responsible, grown-up artists.
btw - Hans Zimmer's decor and wardrobe is such a nice sepia palette - funny how the wardrobe and residence of your interviewees are so coordinated!
For me, cheesiness has something to do with quotes like "does a swan dress up?" or "a true king never calls himself a king". If you sugarcoat a piece, and try to tell to the audience too hard to notice something, it will come out cheesy. It's about presentation.
You are so humble, soft spoken, and smart! I am so excited to learn from you about things that are usually so dry! I love cheese! ❤
I think 'Cheesy' essentially means focusing on nothing but the surface level of the music. When pianists play with full pedal, focus on only the melody, pretentiously trying to sound more emotional, other pianists will be able to tell. And they won't like it. But people who have no understanding of classical music will find it touching.
I think especially this difference between 'understanding the music' and only 'feeling the music' is what makes things cheesy. You call things cheesy when they seem to be liked only by those who enjoy music on a surface level, but truly have no deeper interest in it.
This is also the reason there's so much toxicity around the term. I personally think enjoying cheesy music is completely fine and fun. But optimally, you have some awareness of it.
You don't need to be a musician to notice the cheese.
The cheese is all about being unsubtle, a good portion of the population, maybe 1/5, can notice when you're trying too hard to elicit a certain emotion onto the listener and even predict when you're going to start with the cheese and what you're going to do after.
@@MaxIronsThird The musician was rather an example. If you have deeper interest in the music, you can tell.
It's only when people say they are total fans, without realizing the cheesy-ness, when it starts to seem... inauthentic. You can be a fan of cheese, but you should optimally know it is cheese.
Thanks for bringing up this topic that I’ve thought of but never spoken through.
OH MY GOD!!! I'll never forget you had the opportunity to show us how to dance the Macarena but you didn't. My weekend has been ruined!!!😂😂
😂
Cheesy is also a function of music you are familiar with/grew up on. Orchestral music is not something I grew up on, so some of the things that are nostalgic or pull on the heart strings are in fact new sounds to me. The iv chord in the rachmaninoff example feels honest and genuine, painful and raw, but playing rhythmically in a mixolydian mode feels cheesy because it feels like old rock to me. It feels outdated and pandering, because that is the music I know. To those that do not study the lineage of classical music, some of those cheesy things are genuinely enjoyable, simply because it's not an overused cliche if it hasn't been used on you.
Fascinating to have Hans Zimmer in there. I'd say Zimmer is great because he's not cheesy, and John Williams is great because he _is_ cheesy. (Although I think that cheese came close to ruining Schindler's List near the end...)
I don't know. I've always found Zimmer's music to be kinda cheesy when it isn't just cold, whereas Williams can move me to tears with hardly any effort, and I _welcome_ it, too.
One of the big reasons I love watching this channel is that I never know where a particular video study is going to go. Today's was wonderfully lighthearted as well as being informative!
Did that guy just say Chopin Op 10 No 3 is cheesy? Wow, that’s a hot take. What a terrible opinion lol. Great video though!
terrible etude by Chopin.
Fascinating content! I’ve always wondered about this level of cheesiness when performing
Thank you!
To me, the definition of cheesy music is all of the Casio keyboard demos on the keyboards that teach you how to play songs by making the keys light up. It's the way they're arranged, and the instrument sounds they choose, especially how they add trumpet sounds to stuff that totally shouldn't have it.
Thank-you for reviewing this.
Richard Claydernman and Andre Rieu até two major examples of cheesy for me
Add Yiruma to the list.
And Liberace, the father of the "genre".
To you??? You mean objetive the most cheesy
Andrew Lloyd Webber.
@@leonlinton634 haha...absoutely.
Such great insights; especially from the music friends..! Thanks ✨
Not me thinking of Czerny from the thumbnail ! 😅😆
Amazing content Nahre, keep it up ! 🤍
Thank you very much Nahre!! This was an interesting look at what exactly people consider cheesy. I've had a conversation like this before with my band director, back when I was in high school, and no matter who I seemed to ask it allows met something different. I listen to every genre of music, because music is awesome, and I think that every genre has what can be called 'cheese', but perhaps that's what gives the genre its characteristic. Or maybe I'm just trying to come up with a clever reason for why we may perceive cheese. I do think that the way you describe cheesy is also very dependent on your musical ability, yet I think this comment is long enough, haha. Thank you once for making such fantastic content, hope you are doing well!
> the way you describe cheesy is also very dependent on your musical ability
100%. I actually thought the romanticized Bach was like ok even though it's not what Bach intended. It didn't seem "cheesy" to me, more like if Bach had lived in the romantic era but still wrote with baroque patterns.
I really loved all the mentioned perspectives and summary :)
"Cheesey", to me, tends to sound bright and "juvenile"/"cutesy", potentially "clichéd" as well.
edit: Chopin being "cheesey" is heresy.
Then he shouldn't have been. Kidding, fully agree.
In my daily dive into learning music theory and daws and all the associated stuff you popped up in the RUclips Algorithm, and I loved this! So glad i watched and now am a fan. Like a billion questions type of fan! But I'll try to be brief. From your dive into Debussy (who I love) Ghibli, which I now intend to watch, into your foray with LoFi, which somehow hooked me..Is there a cheese to LoFI and why? Is simple cheesy? So often less is more, right? In part 1 you clearly got the sensation and satisfying feel of the genre, and part 2 the vibe solidified! And last thought..I feel all three previously mentioned evoke a nostalgic, warm, feel. Maybe cheesy is also comforting? And, WOW! Hans Zimmer is a friend.. cool stuff, look forward to more.
Kinda was waiting for you to make a composition that's deliberately cheesey based on what you learned.
Very cool Nahre! Love all the legit interviews! This whole video feels like hallway discussions from college, especially with all the artists you interviewed! Brava!!!
i think it speaks to your character that you had Hans Zimmer in a video and **didn't** use it for clickbait
What a fantastic video! Hans Zimmers, score for "Gladiator" was fantastic! He and the exotic voice of Lisa Gerard really set the mood. 2:28 This is the first time I've ever heard "Pachelbel Canon", Chopin and "Sugar Sugar" described in the same way- which makes me think of another possible factor in deciding whether something is "Cheesy", one's knowledge of the genre. While I agreed with all of the pop music cited as "Cheesy", and have myself railed against Michael Bolton, Kenny G, and all the over-the-top vocal performances of most modern pop singers (especially the females), I never would have thought of Pachelbel Canon or Chopin as cheesy. I'm a HUGE JS Bach fan, and for me, that example really drove home what you mean regarding classical music. Thanks you so much.
that neing said sceipt for Gladiator cheezey to the maxumum. Film music is not music its propellant.
Could we see 'cheesy' as a familiar translation of 'ostentatious'? An over-insistent and annoying display... Which would not mean then that the thing in question is lacking, but it could be so: an ostentatious display of a quality that is either there or partially or totally absent. Cheesiness-ostentation is then presumed by the observer, is easily detectable when the quality so displayed is absent, but is more of a subjective judgment when the quality is present. This would join with the sincerity aspect discussed by many in the video. It would also mean that this is not high art frowning down on popular art. Popular music can indeed be cheesy but is not necessarily so. And classical music or its interpretation can indeed be ostentatious. I think that this is where Nahre and others are getting at in the observations on Chopin. Even the great, in pursuit of ever more greatness, is flirting with cheesiness. To cheese or not to cheese...
This is one of the best video's you've ever made!!! THANK YOU!!!
By the way, we Dutch people know our cheese. We love it. My music taste is cheesy as shit sometimes. I'll eat it all.
To me, saying something is cheesy is always a projection of vanity - it means a person is saying to others ‘I’m too good for this music’ or ‘I’m embarassed by this music’ which is a pretty despicable attitude really in any art form.
I once gave a lesson on “Cheesy Modulation”, where I showed how to modulate between 2 keys (slices of bread) using 1 chord (the cheese). The cheese helped remember!
This may be a bit reductive but to me cheesy is to music what kitsch is to visual arts
Borderline cheesy can be sublime. Considering Hans Zimmer is in this video, consider the main theme from The Crown, especially when it is used to punctuate the end of episodes, including the first episode. It's just a bunch of rowboats slowly heading out for a duck hunt in the fog, but the roaring horn and thundering strings make it compelling in a way I could see a lot of people pooh-poohing, but I love it.
Weird how such a technically precise definition can then turn around and make as horrendous a judgment as considering Celine Dion cheesy.
She's not cheesy. She's just sings mostly garbage elevator music. Cheesy would be a positive step.
@@dougdavis8986 All I know that after seeing this analysis of her by Neely I can't help but admire her ruclips.net/video/epqYft12nV4/видео.html
Bro she kinda is
What a fascinating video, Nahre. Thank you.
In my experience, cheesy isn’t always describing the composition, though it often does. On the contrary, a performance can be cheesy, even if the original is brilliant.
1:16 Oh, I like this! There's a particular way of using the word "sentimental" that I associate with the Russians...and I really *feel* what they mean when they say it, but I couldn't ever put it into other words. "Inauthentic, unearned emotion" might just be it!
I think Satie is cheesy. Some of his cheese is good cheese though! He makes a lot of stinky cheese that I like to take in small bites every once in awhile. Just not too much all at once or it looses its "zing." 😊
Ukraine tho. Putin is cheesey.
@@AnthonyPtak wha...?
@@BrassicaRappa someone mentioned Russian sentimental music... There's a war going on trying to get perspective view.
@@AnthonyPtak Okay, gotcha. I think in psychoanalysis they call that "free association."
@@BrassicaRappa I think under international law it's called "war crimes."
i think a big part of what’s “cheesy” is familiarity, or lack of originality. if you know what’s coming next, if something is too expected and/or overdone, it becomes “cheesy” or “cliché.”
hence why a lot of experienced musicians who have a greater repertoire of knowledge in more obscure pieces might consider overly mainstream pieces such as “river flows in you” to be very “cheesy,” when the general public might find it incredibly moving. It’s interesting because many pieces weren’t considered to be “cheesy” until it trended on tiktok and/or it became more mainstream (such as clair de lune) - so a lot of it can also be a musician’s superiority complex to solidify their “niche” as someone who isn’t “basic.”
another example of the familiarity concept is when you know too much of the intention behind how the musician is trying to convey emotion, such as overdone expressions (lang lang is a great example of who many consider to be “cheesy”) and an overly flowery/romantic style of play - hence why a lot of people describe it as “trying too hard,” when it might just be because you expected and/or understood the intention behind what they were trying to do too much.
I do think that cheese is underrated. We are taught to devalue our emotions, to be too serious, and there is a place for unashamed sentimentality. "For well you know that it's a fool who plays it cool. By making his world a little colder", as Paul McCartney* sang. Where the feeling is authentic, and the performer is inviting the audience to share it, it can be a joyous experience.
* Not John Lennon.
I think about that line a lot. Though it was Paul's!
absolutely agree
literally added a slice of Kraft singles using Lennon. "I don[t believe in Beatles."
@@MitchSumner And you are right. But yes, it's a great line, whoever wrote it.
@@AnthonyPtak Hmm... Kraft Singles? They have to be the least cheesy cheese around. You could at least have gone for a nice cheddar.
Holy i was literally searching for this a year ago wowwww thank you so much Nahre for making me understand what makes music cheesy.
Planets are made of cheese 🧀 therefore everything *must be* cheesy!
Casual conversation with my man Hans 😅
Look, sometimes you just gotta embrace the cheese 🤗
Totally!!
5:50 - omg yes. I remember in the 2000s synthesizers were considered the diabolus in musica basically. Just not pleasant, uncanny. Though of course they were used! They just weren’t used nearly as overtly in pop music as now, now that the 80s are easier to look back on with distance.
Music sounds cheesy if you, as the performer, take more emotion than you give.
Wow, nice!!
Such a tricky topic! Thank you
hot take: What you hear as cheasy or not is entirely subjective and one probably shouldn't care how other people perceive ones personal artistic expression :D
This makes me wonder about whether making cheesy music is also influenced by whether a musician (especially an amateur one) has a community or not.
When you make music on your own without proper education and community, there's no one to validate your music.
When you like something you make, you may not be aware that it's cheesy (and the other way around, you may think that your composition is cheesy but actually it's not).
I think music community helps musicians learn and get a sense of what's cheesy and what's not, and how they can improve their way of creating something cool through music.
(Yea this comment might be a lil personal lol)
Anw awesome content as always!
Sincerely,
A fan from Indonesia
Also depends on the community. There are always echo chambers within communities that perpetualizing stereotypes & cheesiness. In the end it depends on the individual, whether he/she willing to grows out of the echo chamber to notice the cliche/cheesiness of the musical community.
Cheese is making surface level music that relies on stereotypes and emotional manipulation, it's also a favorite buzzword of pretentious and over-achieving musicians.
When I did my orchestration of "Beren and Lúthien", for the counter-melody behind line: "about him cast her shadowy hair and arms like silver glimmering", I cranked up the sentimental strings to the max, for romantic effect. But only that time, mind!
Great video, thank you so much!
I think there is a big key in the text that was shown but not said, about the performing of a famous canadian singer... 0:56
I really love cheesy quotes with humorous effect, as in the improvisations of Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Sonny Rollins, Dexter Gordon...
Lol 9:45 basically calling out MusicalBasics and nearly every RUclips composer
Really enjoyed this video, thank you!
I like how Nahre asked "What is cheesy? Do we apply the word to express our opinions or to attribute specific musical qualities?" Can't this be asked of every aesthetic term? Maybe even emotive ones like "sad". Does the music make me feel sad or, moreover, is *the* music sad in some sense? Obviously the music isn't feeling sadness because it isn't a mind. But... maybe there is something objective about sadness in music!
Very thorough and thought through video! Great! IMHO Jeff Schneider nails it. It's pretentious music played by people who are simply not up to it. Like those piano embellishments that sound way more complicated than they are, clumsily played. Have a good pianist play it and it becomes much less cheesy. The same goes for compositions. If a composer/arranger wants to sound big and emotional, but only knows simple triads and dominant seventh chords - and even screws them up with things like redundant thirds or unnecessary fifths, not knowing elegant drop voicings and smooth voice leading. On the other hand: those 1950s through 1970s advertising jingles were mostly arranged and sung by very skilled musicians and very often had beautiful jazz chord voicings - that's why I don't find them cheesy.
A couple of quibbles, especially around Bach, and the type of instrument to be used. The pianoforte was invented after Bach died. The keyboard instruments he had were harpsichords, clavichords, or organs, only one of which had any organic dynamic response (clavichords), and the harpsichord was the premiere concert instrument, and it is the epitome of a thin tinny piano. Second, the only way a performer could add emphasis was with difference in tempo, rubato, etc., which Bach (in)famously rarely marked in his scores, meaning it isn't required but it isn't prohibited either. Most of Bach's expressiveness is actually harmonic and contrapuntal in nature, which is why it easily can be transcribed between everything between a Moog Synthesizer, crude computer beep generator, to the Swingle Singers.
Mostly agree except Bach did have in his later years occasion to play several new examples of Silbermann's fortepianos at the Court of Frederick the Great and composed The Musical Offering series (published in 1747) following that experience.
Bach was born 1685. Cristofiori invented the pianoforte in 1698, when Bach was 13 years old. By 1750 (when Bach died) the pianoforte had already been perfected by some notable builders, specifically his exact contemporary Gottfried Silbermann.
Bach played on Silbermann's earlier pianofortes and criticized their heavy action and poor treble. The master didn't take that well and had a run-in with Bach, but ultimately improved his fortepianos, and Bach selected (and played on) a Silbermann pianoforte for Frederik the Great in 1749.
By the way: The English title "Well Tempered Harpsichord" is mistranslated; the original title "Das Wohltemperierte Clavier" means literally "The well tempered Keyboard Instrument" although Bach preferred the harpsichord as instrument of choice.
This is such a great dissection of such an amorphous concept. And now I’m feeling so insecure about my compositions.
don't worry just compose.
Just make sure they come from your heart, and they will work. There’s not any kind of music for everyone’s liking, anyways, so don’t worry for leaving someone “outside”, and if there’s some mistakes now, just keep trying and you’ll grow fine in due time.
'unwarranted' Hans nailed it.. classical too can be cheesy not just pop as your video clips implies.
The most concise definiton of cheese is when the fourth wall of performance is broken in listeners/watchers mind by thoughts outside of context of media experienced. So for an example, your playing bach 'romanticized' is not cheesy, unless listeners notice, the choice to make it sound nuanced (or whatever they may say impacted the performance) was made by you. The reasons of course can be many and various as it's subjective but the objective core stays the same.
It really does seem like it has many layers, sometimes I hear certain sound-design such as a lot of 80's fm synths and find those cheesy, even though they're not sappy or anything along those lines. Then there's associations we make to things other than the music itself influencing it further, and sometimes we don't mind certain kinds of cheese, for a lot of people these become guilty pleasures. I don't feel shame, but those 80's synths are an example that sometimes just work for me.
"What do we mean when we call a piece of music 'cheesy'?"
This already has a vsauce-feel to it. With that said...
*Playing "Moon Men" by Jake Chudnow*
5:33 - Fashion, Art & Design - I am glad you made these comparisons - I would take it even further, as Cheese/Cheesy can be applied as a subjective assessment of similar criteria in any meta-game strategy
Avoiding parallel fifths will diminish the propensity for cheese 🧀. Perhaps.
The problem with popular music is marketing, which, due to the rules of consumption, wants art to be made like aspirin, one bestseller one after another.
That's why we got it into our heads that the old is useless because it's old (explain it to me with classical music).
However, anyone makes art (to the best of their ability) for a social environment that is common to them. The theme is diffusion, who decides what music or what art is seen and what benefit that product brings
To me, an important part of what makes something cheesy, whether this is directly noticeable or not, is a lack of sincerety. If something is truly sincere, it cannot be cheesy. For example, I don't believe a single emotion from Steve Perry, so most of his singing that leans into his faux-emotive style is especially cheesy to me. I don't think that's the only thing, because there's a lot of things I see that I also consider faux-emotion that aren't necessarily cheesy.
Also, I have noticed that it's much harder to write a happy song that isn't cheesy, it so often feels false. I was impressed by Pharrell Williams' "Happy" because it feels like such a genuine expression of happiness that I couldn't read it as cheesy.
Context is everything
This was a fantastic way of edifying us on the word CHESSY because of the varied view points and out looks of the assorted company of friends. (I am of the view point that CHESSY are things not done that well, but make us laugh or cringe because it's just CHESSY) keep up the good work Kind regards from Worrell Robinson.
I think additionally in pop/rock sometimes the cheese comes from vocal delivery style and visuals as well, like corny old music videos with hammy acting and musical-theater-style vocals.
Ham & cheese 😄
Funny, it's one of those things that we often don't give much thought, and yet somehow we all have such a similar grasp of the idea of something being "cheesy" (even if we may not agree about what exactly falls into that category). Great video!