I like when a person of Yann's caliber can give insights over social, politic and other interactions of AI. He may have slight preference bias sometimes but who doesn't really? I enjoyed it very much, thanks a lot Zetta for your initiative of AI Native!
Not true. They both started studying the back propagation algorithm around 1986. They share the Turing Award for a reason. If anything, David Rumelhart would have deserved being acknowledged here … And it was Hinton’s student Alex Krizhevsky who started the DL hype.
Agreed. He's very smart when it comes to some things, but surprisingly not smart about others. Particularly when it comes to factoring in human motivations and behaviors.
This conversation is incredibly insightful. Way to go. Thank you.
I like when a person of Yann's caliber can give insights over social, politic and other interactions of AI. He may have slight preference bias sometimes but who doesn't really? I enjoyed it very much, thanks a lot Zetta for your initiative of AI Native!
Why does he carefully conceal that Geoff Hinton was the originator of the systems he works with?
Not true. They both started studying the back propagation algorithm around 1986. They share the Turing Award for a reason.
If anything, David Rumelhart would have deserved being acknowledged here … And it was Hinton’s student Alex Krizhevsky who started the DL hype.
next one,
AI+ CLIMATE
will explain to you where the truth is and where your place is
Yann does not analyse very deeply in making his arguments against control. Not clear his incentive ...
Agreed. He's very smart when it comes to some things, but surprisingly not smart about others. Particularly when it comes to factoring in human motivations and behaviors.