How The Beatles Made "Can't Buy Me Love" | The A Hard Day's Night Sessions

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024

Комментарии • 47

  • @bryanmachin2152
    @bryanmachin2152 Месяц назад +1

    What makes this song so good is the intro that is very similar to the chorus, but has the chord change on the third "can't buy me love" that then leads into the first verse--That is just a phenomenal change--those kind of changes separate the really great songwriters from the ordinary songwriters.

  • @hasick
    @hasick 2 месяца назад +1

    One of their best songs

  • @ARWest-bp4yb
    @ARWest-bp4yb 2 месяца назад +2

    A great song and solo by George, those leftover twangy notes from the earlier take fit in perfectly.👍👍

  • @bobwilcox3463
    @bobwilcox3463 2 месяца назад +5

    One of My favorite song on the HARD Days Night Album.

  • @cowboys4life956
    @cowboys4life956 2 месяца назад +3

    Amazing song, very energetic.

  • @chriscampanozzi6516
    @chriscampanozzi6516 2 месяца назад +6

    Great information as always, thank you for your content.

  • @tmurphy1000
    @tmurphy1000 2 месяца назад +9

    Not their only recording outside London. They also recorded with Tony Sheridan in Germany.

    • @BeatlesBible1
      @BeatlesBible1  2 месяца назад +14

      No, the Beatles didn't record with Tony Sheridan; _The Beat Brothers_ recorded with Tony Sheridan. It's a small factual difference, but The Beatles were not credited in that record. "Can't Buy Me Love" was the only time they recorded overseas under the name _"Beatles."_

    • @tmurphy1000
      @tmurphy1000 2 месяца назад +4

      @@BeatlesBible1 ok, fair enough.

  • @markdoughty8780
    @markdoughty8780 2 месяца назад

    They were already global stars just three singles in and it was onward and upward from there; very interesting little video - thanks for uploading.

  • @strathman7501
    @strathman7501 2 месяца назад +2

    Another nicely made video, Mr. Bible. Cheers!

  • @edryba4867
    @edryba4867 2 месяца назад +3

    Nicely done! Good photos, good sound bites. Your narrator mangled a few words, but you know what the professionals say: “There’s quality, and then there’s RUclips quality”.

  • @GravityBoy72
    @GravityBoy72 2 месяца назад

    Can't Buy Me Love is a brilliant tune.
    Especially with the Beatles running in and out of a Police Station.

  • @randybackgammon890
    @randybackgammon890 2 месяца назад

    Exellent detail.Most absorbing

  • @nickanderson9695
    @nickanderson9695 2 месяца назад +1

    What was the reason for taking off the backing vocals? I always love the charm of the anthology version with them. I always figured it was just to make it easier to perform live. Great video!

  • @Robert-673
    @Robert-673 2 месяца назад +4

    George Martin was completely on point. The Beatles constantly evolved their “Beatles sound” which is why he wanted to hold back Roll Over Beethoven and the delivery of Can’t Buy me Love raised the quality of their brand to the next level. The next palpable jump was A Ticket to Ride a year later.

  • @Gizzorge
    @Gizzorge 2 месяца назад +4

    Thx

  • @azloii9781
    @azloii9781 2 месяца назад

    The thumbnail spells "Can't Me Buy Love"

  • @promerops
    @promerops 2 месяца назад

    I liked "Love Me Do" and "Please Please Me", but their next three singles didn't appeal to me - and still don't. Then out came "Can't Buy Me Love" and the Beatles were well and truly re-instated, for me.

    • @vincec727
      @vincec727 2 месяца назад

      What were the “ next 3 singles”?

    • @promerops
      @promerops 2 месяца назад

      @@vincec727 Unless I'm mistaken: "From Me to You", "I Wanna Hold your Hand", "She Loves You". I speak, of course, of the Beatles British releases, regardless of any strange games the US labels were playing.

    • @vincec727
      @vincec727 2 месяца назад +1

      @@promerops Dang. i love those 3. 🤷‍♂️

  • @magneto7930
    @magneto7930 2 месяца назад

    Are you using AI toward the end? It doesn't sound completely like Paul's voice.

    • @BeatlesBible1
      @BeatlesBible1  2 месяца назад +2

      No, it's all real audio. 👍

    • @magneto7930
      @magneto7930 2 месяца назад +1

      @@BeatlesBible1 okay thank you. It just didn't sound like him.

  • @stevetobin7495
    @stevetobin7495 2 месяца назад

    Tavistock NOT The Beatles- we've all been had

    • @piscesman54
      @piscesman54 15 дней назад

      Still harping on that nonsense?

    • @stevetobin7495
      @stevetobin7495 15 дней назад

      @@piscesman54 so true I’m afraid.. take some time and see for yourself…all industries are run by Satanist’s inverting reality

  • @TheAerovons
    @TheAerovons 2 месяца назад +1

    Trivia: first Beatles song with a Rickenbacker 12 string

  • @piotrq7150
    @piotrq7150 2 месяца назад +3

    Im not a big fan of that song. I always prefer Lennon's work over Paul's on that album.

  • @GreenGibbon
    @GreenGibbon 2 месяца назад +2

    I've always thought Can't Buy Me Love is simply an (obvious) answer to Money (That's What I Want), and nowhere near as good. For my money Can't Buy Me Love lacks vibe. Speaking of Money (That's What I Want), Lennon's version is a rip-snorter, but I do also think the original version, recorded by Barrett Strong in 1959, takes the cake. Barrett Strong's version is far less aggressive than Lennon's and it's interesting to compare the two. Money (That's What I Want) was written by Berry Gordy, and was Motown's first hit record.

    • @michaeldunne338
      @michaeldunne338 2 месяца назад +1

      Ian MacDonald wrote in "Revolution in the Head" that "Money suited Lennon's persona and the group's live requirements so well that they featured it regularly between 1960 to 1964."

    • @GreenGibbon
      @GreenGibbon 2 месяца назад

      @@michaeldunne338 Yes, no doubt Money would have ripped it up at any Beatles show! A great crowd number.

    • @azloii9781
      @azloii9781 2 месяца назад +1

      I agree it has no vibe great way to put it

  • @hakonberg8003
    @hakonberg8003 2 месяца назад +3

    This song, IMHO, is one of the very few Paul songs that lack the Beatles magic....it is catchy, and performed well but it could be a song by any 60s group really.... way too cliche bluesy chord structure.

    • @jackstonehenge
      @jackstonehenge 2 месяца назад

      Yes, I hesitated to say because of being negative but as huge Beatles fan, I’ve never really been into this song.
      Just kind of boring melodically and structurally. Feels like a throwaway that got a lot of play.

    • @piscesman54
      @piscesman54 15 дней назад

      That is precisely what's great about it. If it hadn't had the Beatles magic, it would never have made it to #1.

  • @DanWall-xq3ed
    @DanWall-xq3ed 2 месяца назад

    Boring 12 bar structure. Non very Beatles. More like an Elvis rip off.

    • @piscesman54
      @piscesman54 15 дней назад

      Great song, very groovy. The Beatles could do anything. In fact, in their early days in Hamburg, they were doing a lot of this kind of stuff.

  • @georgejamestaylor7572
    @georgejamestaylor7572 2 месяца назад +4

    Thier weakest single, in my opinion!

    • @piscesman54
      @piscesman54 15 дней назад

      Weak? It's a banger of a rockn' roll. Powerful vocals, great guitar solo. Great groove. Much bluesier than their previous poppy singles.

  • @2121supernova
    @2121supernova 2 месяца назад +6

    Trump ❤

    • @hakonberg8003
      @hakonberg8003 2 месяца назад

      Please dump your manure onto other places in youtube. Or preferably nowhere.

    • @slipnorris5882
      @slipnorris5882 Месяц назад

      Sucks❤

  • @sunshinecoolwater9528
    @sunshinecoolwater9528 2 месяца назад

    Never liked this song. I find it as weak. Very catchy, but that is its flaw.