@@kuhnville3145 You’re completely wrong, I suggest you compare specs and educate yourself. Stealthier yes, but with radars and new missles better performance. Kind of makes that stealth obsolete. Shall we discuss the coating issues
@@district5198 sure! The new coating is much more durable and stealthier. It’s a white color and is being used on the B-21 Raider. It calls do much less frequent changes. The F-35 RADAR is comparable to that of an AWACS for its size, and the technology integrated makes it a flying supercomputer. Just having a friendly F-35 in the same airspace. gives you an advantage. Also you guys love to say modern RADAR and missiles make stealth obsolete. This is stupid, you cannot just see through stealth. Low frequency RADAR can see them, sure, but they can also see literally everything else in the airspace and on the ground as well, so the clutter is far too much. the missiles, however, have been shown to be able to break lock just by changing aspect and flying away.
@@kuhnville3145 how many millions wasted on the f-35 and f-22 both no match for the s-400 s-500 s-550. And let’s not forget su-57 does have s-70 wing man. Just received new engines, more powerful radar and hypersonic missile technology well ahead of USA. So you would be very foolish to underestimate Russian technology. Of which USA stealth is based upon.
@@district5198 you lost all credibility saying US stealth is based off of Russian technology. Only influence Russia (or more accurately the USSR) had on US stealth was a book someone wrote about wave deflection. This book was used partially in the design process for the F-117. That’s literally it. S-### SAMs have proven ineffective against fourth generation aircraft that have little to no stealth, and are avoided by just flying low and out of line of sight. Then you add stealth and it gets infinitely harder to properly lock and track the target. Millions were not ‘wasted’ on these programs, as they prove their worth in every combat exercise they partake it. I can say millions were wasted on any program I want, but that doesn’t mean it was wasted. The F-35 program, for example, is often called too expensive for a projected price for its entire 70 year life span, one that is cheaper than many less competent fighters. The F-22, although expensive, has proved its worth. It’s about 3-4 times as expensive as the F-15C, but has shown it can kill well over that amount. In one exercise killing seven eagles in one sortie, proving its only limited by its number of missiles (6 AMRAAM, 2 AiM-9X. The AMRAAM Delta is soon to be replaced by the Peregrine missile, which is slightly better but half the size. This means the F-22 could then carry twelve missiles in its main bays instead of it’s current six). Hypersonic missiles are easily defeated with either airborne decoys like the F-35’s, or by intercepting them by other SAM sites and possibly even other AA missiles. Older Patriot sites have intercepted them in the past, so modern ones should have no problem. Another thing; you guys *loooove* to point out upgrades that supposedly make them better. You guys never realize that the F-22 has gotten major game changing upgrades since its inception. F-35 has gotten an absolute plethora of upgrade due to its modular nature, with a new one being an adaptive-cycle engine which will make their Russian counterparts look weak and primitive. People like yourself also love to point to the money ‘wasted’ on these aircraft. As mentioned prior, they make up their price and then some by outperforming every other fighter by miles. Then you say ‘oh but it’s still too much money’. The US budget is many times greater that of Russia’s, and it shows. You guys just can’t seem to realize that we have a bomber that is many times larger than your Su-57 fighters, but has a much smaller RCS. Also let’s just look at numbers. There are more than 180 F-22s in active service. There are well more than 1,000 F-35A/B/C worldwide. The F-35 class of aircraft (Conventional, STOVL, and Carrier Operations) has more aircraft together than the rest of the world’s stealth aircraft combined. This easily shows the US is ahead of Russia just by the fact it can mass produce while Russia can only make a handful a year. The US is also not looking to make new sixth generation aircraft before Russia even has a competent fifth generation, the NGAD and F/A-XX. Go try to convince someone else, I know what I’m taking about.
@@essemkayy and you believe him? there is not a day when they tell the truth, only beautiful pictures for propaganda, but in fact russia is a corrupt terrorist country, don't be naive and don't believe everything they say in russia, there are a lot of lies in there, f-16 much more better than russian garbage
aircraft generations are basically just market points by now, for Russia it is a major step up from their fourth gen even though it's nowhere near on par with US fighters that we consider of the same generation.
Awesome edit, dude! Great respect to you
Thank you!
This is porbably the best edit, I went through like 5 of the top I can find but this tops them by so much. Good job!
Thank you, I'm glad you like it
Haha yeah, just wished it was a bit longer.
@@Andro.d I plan on making some crossing over 1 minute 30 seconds, possibly 2 minutes too.
@Andro¡d Have a look at this, slightly longer than the others: ruclips.net/video/z47yzKE2h_8/видео.html
I just made a Su57 edit. Looking at the footage, it makes me feel good cause I know how you make em so good. Not bragging… just saying good job bro
these are rare edits to come across, especially this good
Thank you for your kind words, stay tuned for more!
Very nice.
It is so stealthy it has never been spotted in combat..
Buen videos
Su 57 = Scary plane 🇷🇺💪
🤓☝ skareyy
🇩🇿 su-57❤
Music
In every video, I include all the credits in the description. All music and videos can be found there. The music is called "Criminals" by F.O.O.L
The future of aviation 🇷🇺💪❤️🇨🇦…
maybe for Russia, but modern Western fighters like the F-22 and F-35 are better in pretty much every way that matters.
@@kuhnville3145 You’re completely wrong, I suggest you compare specs and educate yourself. Stealthier yes, but with radars and new missles better performance. Kind of makes that stealth obsolete. Shall we discuss the coating issues
@@district5198 sure! The new coating is much more durable and stealthier. It’s a white color and is being used on the B-21 Raider. It calls do much less frequent changes. The F-35 RADAR is comparable to that of an AWACS for its size, and the technology integrated makes it a flying supercomputer. Just having a friendly F-35 in the same airspace. gives you an advantage. Also you guys love to say modern RADAR and missiles make stealth obsolete. This is stupid, you cannot just see through stealth. Low frequency RADAR can see them, sure, but they can also see literally everything else in the airspace and on the ground as well, so the clutter is far too much. the missiles, however, have been shown to be able to break lock just by changing aspect and flying away.
@@kuhnville3145 how many millions wasted on the f-35 and f-22 both no match for the s-400 s-500 s-550. And let’s not forget su-57 does have s-70 wing man. Just received new engines, more powerful radar and hypersonic missile technology well ahead of USA. So you would be very foolish to underestimate Russian technology. Of which USA stealth is based upon.
@@district5198 you lost all credibility saying US stealth is based off of Russian technology. Only influence Russia (or more accurately the USSR) had on US stealth was a book someone wrote about wave deflection. This book was used partially in the design process for the F-117. That’s literally it.
S-### SAMs have proven ineffective against fourth generation aircraft that have little to no stealth, and are avoided by just flying low and out of line of sight. Then you add stealth and it gets infinitely harder to properly lock and track the target. Millions were not ‘wasted’ on these programs, as they prove their worth in every combat exercise they partake it. I can say millions were wasted on any program I want, but that doesn’t mean it was wasted. The F-35 program, for example, is often called too expensive for a projected price for its entire 70 year life span, one that is cheaper than many less competent fighters.
The F-22, although expensive, has proved its worth. It’s about 3-4 times as expensive as the F-15C, but has shown it can kill well over that amount. In one exercise killing seven eagles in one sortie, proving its only limited by its number of missiles (6 AMRAAM, 2 AiM-9X. The AMRAAM Delta is soon to be replaced by the Peregrine missile, which is slightly better but half the size. This means the F-22 could then carry twelve missiles in its main bays instead of it’s current six). Hypersonic missiles are easily defeated with either airborne decoys like the F-35’s, or by intercepting them by other SAM sites and possibly even other AA missiles. Older Patriot sites have intercepted them in the past, so modern ones should have no problem.
Another thing; you guys *loooove* to point out upgrades that supposedly make them better. You guys never realize that the F-22 has gotten major game changing upgrades since its inception. F-35 has gotten an absolute plethora of upgrade due to its modular nature, with a new one being an adaptive-cycle engine which will make their Russian counterparts look weak and primitive.
People like yourself also love to point to the money ‘wasted’ on these aircraft. As mentioned prior, they make up their price and then some by outperforming every other fighter by miles. Then you say ‘oh but it’s still too much money’. The US budget is many times greater that of Russia’s, and it shows. You guys just can’t seem to realize that we have a bomber that is many times larger than your Su-57 fighters, but has a much smaller RCS.
Also let’s just look at numbers. There are more than 180 F-22s in active service. There are well more than 1,000 F-35A/B/C worldwide. The F-35 class of aircraft (Conventional, STOVL, and Carrier Operations) has more aircraft together than the rest of the world’s stealth aircraft combined. This easily shows the US is ahead of Russia just by the fact it can mass produce while Russia can only make a handful a year. The US is also not looking to make new sixth generation aircraft before Russia even has a competent fifth generation, the NGAD and F/A-XX.
Go try to convince someone else, I know what I’m taking about.
This is not fifth generation jet
Yes it is, it is a Fifth Generation fighter, one made after the previous 4.5. Read the Sukhoi manufacturers guide.
@@essemkayy and you believe him? there is not a day when they tell the truth, only beautiful pictures for propaganda, but in fact russia is a corrupt terrorist country, don't be naive and don't believe everything they say in russia, there are a lot of lies in there, f-16 much more better than russian garbage
@@essemkayy yeah that actually design was before.
aircraft generations are basically just market points by now, for Russia it is a major step up from their fourth gen even though it's nowhere near on par with US fighters that we consider of the same generation.