this is the greatest thing i'v ever seen. I am 82 years old and just had a great adventure. I just called my son to watch these wonderful scenes. thanks!
Imagine a base telescope located on the other side of the moon, just to look into deep space. There it wouldn't have any interference, isn't it? I love this videos.
It wouldn't have much interference directly from Earth, but it would still have interference from the Sun, and would need (at least one) relay satellite orbiting the Moon to relay information.
Can you answer why from 19 billion $ for a year you dont have one zooming from Huble telescope on earth ? If this are time laps pictures how you took them?
Are you stupid? Zooming in Earth from the Hubble, would be like looking at a basket ball from 1 inch distance with binoculars. Do you know at what altitude the Hubble orbits???
Just bad cgi one, firstly look at the moon, it's doesn't move ? this cant be because remember dude, world turn around 1000mph/h speed, and we will see same side moon always. If moon doesn't move you cant see a same side on earth.
I was wondering why I cannot see the new moon. I have looked through all types of lenses and feel that when it is between the sun and earth I should be able to see a dark ball in the sky. Why can I not see it?
gudtims4all Because you have been lied to at school. The earth is flat and stationery and the moon is a luminary and not a stupid dust ball. Planet Plane channel: 200 Proofs that the earth is not a spinning ball. Good luck my friend and God bless you.
Yes, there is real footage. You just haven't been paying attention and/or you are in such extreme denial that you wouldn't see it if it was placed right in front of you. (like the university professor who claimed that, even if one of the Apollo astroNOTs admitted that they never went to the Moon, he would still BELIEVE that we did -- two sides of the same coin, you and them)
Since we have no reference it is literally impossible for anyone to know one way or the other whether it is real or not. So you just have a BELIEF and/or a guess.
Pink Floyd was right: there is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact it's all dark (depending on where the sun is illuminating it in relation to your vantage point, but I guess that didn't fit in the song).
Yes we believe this video "made possible by computer graphics". We also understand that there isn't any giant floating text either side of the moon. You have reached astronomical levels of stupidity.
+NASA Goddard what does that even mean? "when it's appropriate." you do understand that there's a growing number of people who doubt the authenticity of... well, pretty much anything that NASA does. except of course, take money from taxpayers. that is a very real and noticeable thing NASA does. But put actual cameras in space to capture as video evidence all the things you claim to be doing? nope, too much to ask. a 360° panning of the camera on the manned moon landing? nope, why do that, right? unedited pictures of the earth and the moon? nope, that's inappropriate apparently. hey... how is it that the earth is an oblate spheroid, yet the moon maintains a synchronized orbit? it's okay friend, I don't expect an honest reply. well, until it's appropriate anyway.
No sir, we would choose actual evidence over artistic renditions. Ignorance stems from Not asking questions, and from accepting answers without any proof.
NASA... that's not what he was asking. The rotation speed of the earth is basically one revolution per day or 0.25 RPM (revolutions per minute. The "speed" is relative to one position on the earth.
Do Earth and Moon actually appear to be so close together with any real practical camera? It seems that the moon is about to touch and fall onto the earth.
I can imagine someone making a lot of effort in doing the animations, lighting, and attaching LRO images on the Moon model. Unfortunately, I do not need to imagine the quality of RUclips comments on this fine video...
@@yt-user-dz996 You talk about evidence yet you conspiracy theorist have no evidence of anything you claim. You just swallow everything the opportunists tell you.
@@kamisa7362Condemnation without investigation is ignorance and ignorance is one of stupidities greatest symptoms. I'm here investigating both sides and the globe model is falling apart. Investigate it.
Hi, I wonder, is it possible to do a similar video to show the view from one of the Peaks of (almost) eternal light at thesouth pole (or north pole) with the Earth rising and setting? I think it would rise, describe a small arc, set, and return half a lunar month later and repeat the cycle, but each time rising in a different phase and going half way through the cycle of phases before setting. So it would be fascinating to see this for at least a year and would be nice if it could also do the 18.6 year and 8.65 year cycles so that it doesn't always rise and set in the same direction and sometimes spend more time above and sometimes more time below the horizon. Could be just with a flat horizon, and it would also be cool with a simulated horizon from e.g.a south pole terrain map around one of the favoured peaks of eternal light. But just this one with the moon replaced by a horizontal lunar horizon would be great :). Oh and it would be nice to have an unobtrusive day counter in one of the corners, could just be decimal days, to know where it is in the cycle.
J I assume that you use a smart phone or digital camera to take pictures of your family and friends. Why do you bother? By your definition they're CGI, therefore not real.
Jonny B guud you don’t need an atmosphere to maneuver a space craft. Conservation of linear and angular momentum applies everywhere. You don’t need air for combustion, either. The rockets have their own combustible fuel.
I seen a video from NASA that had a NASA scientist saying how to send ppl to mars, and said that with our current technology it would be almost impossible to go through the van allen radiation belts. So how the hell did we go through them to get to the moon and then again back to earth in 1969?????
yes, but if we already went threw the radiation belts way back in '69 then the shielding shouldn't even be an issue and they should already know exactly how to make it and with newer technology. so like I said, that shouldn't even be an issue. The way he's talking, shielding is a major issue. Also, why did he say that they never sent ppl threw them???....I'm not one of those ppl who doesn't think we went to the moon but, i'am starting to question it.
NASA Goddard Ok. Advise me something to do because i have seen almost all movies about space and have a little bit knowledge about Nasa and space. what should i do for Nasa. I am very far from you.:-(
Kreuzer Sixtysix I see that that the few pictures of the whole globe are fake. they are all composite images. nothing real about it. NASA even admits the are composite images!
+Mediocre Monday It's not bad to question everything that you've never saw,but it's not good to say everything is wrong without finding your own evidences.
Why are the craters on the far side of the moon so much more homogenous that the near side? Is it simply coincidence, did the larger strikes on the near side have something to do with the side always facing us, or is it something else?
The video talks about the maria on the surface facing Earth. Earth's gravity helped cause lava to erupt from the Moon on the near side and fill in craters.
Why can't we have real video when countries have been supposedly going to outer space. How difficult could it be when we can clearly see the moon at night n day too. Why no dam close ups. Come on NASA u can do better. We can see milky ways n Mars but no moon. Huuum.
+Norlee Garcia There are lots of photos of the moon close up. Just go to NASA Apollo image gallery. www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/images.html or www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/22304920636/
i dont remember what was taught in school but does the moon rotate like the earth does. or does it not spin at all? if someone knows for sure please answers this.
Edward Priebe The moon is in gravitational lock with the earth. One face is always pointing at the earth. It revolves around the earth in about 28, and rotates once in that same period. Cool animation to show: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking
Tony Regan You believers in these conspiracies are the laughingstock of the world. Keep sitting back in your corner with your tin foil hats and watch the whole world pass you by.
the nforcer The funny thing is that you assume I " take what I'm told on face value without independent investigation". Why do you assume I do the same thing you do ? All your 'evidence' is based on conspiracies, that makes your 'evidence' meaningless. The Blue Marble is a photo taken by the crew of Apollo 17 in 1972. There was no CGI in 1972. You can go on and on and try to prove your point of view, but you can't deny that photo is real, unless of course you bring up more conspiracies which makes your point utterly invalid.
When you can utterly prove beyond doubt that those photos are real, then I will believe it. Until then I keep an open mind, like any curious human being would.
Why do moon craters look as though they were all formed by impacts perpendicular to its' surface? The chances of the happening consistently must be extremely remote.
It's a valid question. I suppose it would have to do with gravitational pull exceeding vertical/horizontal momentum; sattelites paths intersecting the moon rather than it being hit by "flyby" objects, if that makes any sense. I'm just guessing, though.
what a great question.. and if we are tidally locked then how ae there any on the the side of the moon facing uss, if the earth has been here the whole time
"This is not the actual moon. It's a CGI replica of the moon. NASA will never let us know what lies on the far side of the moon." Thank you for saying what everyone is thinking Thane.
Thankyou so much for this amazing view. My Grandad was born in the century before last ! He died in the third quarter of the 20th century. Imagine his parents being presented with the amazing knowledge we have today. Even he would have loved this film. It was him who showed me many things in nature. The secret places where birds nest, and squirrels slept. He also taught me about the moon, and how it moves.
I don't criticize that they don't have real picture, but they could at least mention the CGI is a representation of our current understanding of Earth and the Moon and may or may not be the full reality.
+NASA Goddard It may be that you are asking way too much from the anti-NASA trolls, such as suggesting that they can read anything, much less the "about" text. And most of the 358 who voted "dislike" probably didn't even watch a minute of the upload.
+nano63a I'm not sure whether Earth is spherical or flat...but for sure it's not spinning..I believe the geocentric model was correct, and it makes more sense, I don't know why we changed it. That doesn't mean Earth is the center of the universe, but it should be the center of our system. I think it's time for NASA to consider all these possibilities.
Jim Wheeler What is annoying? Don't have the technology to see the things the way it is? Oh it is true... I am crazy about the universe... but, what about the huble?
+Denise Maria Branquinho talking about the dark side of the moon, Hub telescope is great cause it shoots out to the starts but we fly to the moon but I've never seen a clear picture of the other side just a computer generated image
+Reformed All time lapse is essentially CGI these days. Nobody's physically cutting film any more. The caption is very clear about how we assembled this visualization.
+NASA Goddard IT IS atotal waste of time to try to argue with the anti-NASA trolls. I Just block them, including "Reformed" and "SKIdru". YOu really need to do likewise
NASA Goddard There is really no need to waste your time explaining these paranoid potheads. You just need to block them. C'mon, NASA, I know you can do better
I absolutely love how in the description it clearly says images were created which means Its CGI image...we have sent satellites to take pictures of Pluto and Saturn and mars but we can't get a real photo of the other side of the moon the image has to be created? makes no sence
Since the moon is tidally locked to the Earth, does it mean the far side is actually lighter than the near side? If so can someone explain the phenomenon?
syncmaster915n sorry pal they can't see it... NASA is fake the earth is flat there's no such thing as SATs there all c.g.i please wake up you never see any stars
The center of mass of the Moon is offset from the absolute center of the Moon. The farside isn’t necessarily lighter than the nearside, the farside has a thicker crust than the nearside but the nearside, as you pointed out, has more dense volcanic material at the surface. The reason for the concentration of volcanic material on the nearside reflects early formation conditions of the Moon billions of years ago.
Thanks for the reply :) One more question, did the offset cause the moon to be tidally locked to the earth? Or what caused the moon or any other space bodies (eg. Mercury) to be tidally locked?
syncmaster915n When moon formed it was in molted state and and was very close to earth. Earth tidal forces deformed it with permanent bulge due to small variations in the gravity at different points on the moon resulting in tidal locking and pointing this permanent bulge towards earth. Since tidal bulge on earth is dragged east of moon, the tidal force of moon tries to align it. This in fact tries to slow down earths rotation and this loss in angular momentum is thus transferred to moon resulting in receding of the moon @3.5 cm per year.
Because non-visual sensors can produce higher quality topographical data, which can then later be visualized. Is that really so difficult to understand?
I have been trying to looking for the video that show all planets of our solar system relating to our Milky Way galaxy : axis, direction of the rotation, trajectory
As it says in the description, this is CGI, there is no camera. Also, they have rendered the scene from two different perspectives, so of course the size changes.
Why even bother explaining anything to the flat earth people with there magical dome covering the flat earth. I have never actually seen oxygen with my eye's so it doesn't exist and we don't need are lungs either. They come to sites like this to meet up with others of there kind to try and feel human because they could never grasp how things actually work. So they live in a big terrarium with the magical cover to keep all the oxygen in that you can't see. And God will take care of them for ever and ever! I believe in God. He sure can do better then a domed flat earth...and He did! Peace
That sure is quite a difference in size of the earth between the normal and wide angle lens. I also like how the moon stayed the same size. That is some special lens they got there. I guess they must have used a wide angle lens when taking the "earth from moon photos" from the apollo missions, given that the earth size matches the size in those photos.
Earth is flat, the fact that this video is based on imaginary graphics, means you have absolutely no clue about how the moon looks from the other side, since you have no REAL video to prove it.
"Earth is flat" Where is your photo of the edge of the earth? Where is the evidence of the people who tried to reach it? Keep believing in your imaginary god, kid.
0:25 so NASA... is that a real view ??? or just a computer graphics coz something is wrong with that 50 year gap of no humans put again on moon...can we put some live cam on moon or somethink??? or just another 'computer graphics' hmmm ???
the Greeks figured out the earth was spherical 2,000 years ago. y'all have nearly limitless information at your fingertips and choose to believe the absolutely least factually supportive and conceptually sound idea ever, the flat earth. incredible.
The 3 astronauts that went to the moon in 1969 were asked the same question by the reporters. They appeared to be very troubled by the question and didn't give a convincing answer.
the earth bulges in the middle like a middle aged man. Im sure pilots would have trouble following the flight plan if it was. not to mention two tides that the earth rolls under would be fucking extreme if we were pair shaped man
Then you're a fool. The "pear shape" of the Earth is a few kilometers or about 0.3% of the radius. Don't people like you ever check anything for themselves before displaying their ignorance?
Awesome, We have finally seen the "other side" of the moon... Like it doesn't look like the side we already see... Also this video is just computer animation its not real...So this isn't even the real "other side" of the moon. Its all just imagination still.
+Scott Enow This is a simulation. Therefor we are simulating how you wouldn't see any stars from this perspective, with the brilliance of sunlight reflecting off the Earth and the Moon.
Ok I realised that after I commented, however we should be able to get actual footage not a simulation. We have satellites out that far, its just a matter of attaching a camera.
The video said it was a "'time-lapse telescopic view made possible by computer graphics". ?????!! What does that mean? So it's NOT a time-lapse telescopic view. It's Photoshop fakery? Why don't you publish a real video and put the Flat-Earthers to rest?
They're showing us a computer-generated view because no real video view of the same thing exists. (In fact, if you consider the two viewpoints they use, getting a real video of the same thing would be nearly impossible.)
+flymasterA, man they can't !! That's why they don't. It's not hard to understand. Now- if you want to not believe in the flat earth, go on believing that ships sail on the side of the earth and even go as far as sailing upside down, as stupid as it sounds, on a flat earth, ships could also sail on the side of the earth too. Better get your globe and and really do a comparison, on the side is on the side no matter how you define it. And maybe while yer at it spin the flat earth to create GrAVITay liken the ball earth. So the water won't go a flying off.
in under a minute I have to stop and comment. riddle me this : why is the earth a moon sized object in the apollo photos and not taking up most of the lunar skyline? this cgi is from NASA and reflects what we could expect to see in objective terms from this vantage point in space so imagine how big the earth would look if you are standing on top of it there.
No. This video is not intended to be precisely to scale. If you want to see a real perspective from a million miles out, check out: ruclips.net/video/DMdhQsHbWTs/видео.html
Tommy X Lourdes The Earth's radius is about 4 times the Moon's, so if you stand on the Moon it will look about 4 times as wide as the Moon does from the Earth. (Which is to say, about 2 degrees wide.)
The "camera" is essentially rotating with the moon as it orbits the Earth. It's the same phenomenon that causes us to only see one side of the Moon from Earth - tidal locking.
NASA Goddard Too many coincidences to be true..Sun is 400 times more distant then Moon so they look they are same size..Moon is rotating so perfect synchronized that we can not see other side...Sun works exactly with tehnology that we use..Solar system is flat in such a big space..And all that from explosion called Big Bang from nothing?
An okay CGI demo... Is it for an upcoming Hollywood blockbuster? it's cool that NAZA now officially went into doing sci-fi... after all their whole racket isn't going to go anywhere else since the US establishment is about to get served.
this is the greatest thing i'v ever seen. I am 82 years old and just had a great adventure. I just called my son to watch these wonderful scenes. thanks!
Hello, I'm checking People, are you okay?
:)
hi?
@@R0DBS2Are you?
Imagine a base telescope located on the other side of the moon, just to look into deep space. There it wouldn't have any interference, isn't it? I love this videos.
It wouldn't have much interference directly from Earth, but it would still have interference from the Sun, and would need (at least one) relay satellite orbiting the Moon to relay information.
James Webb has you covered
I assume this is fake imagery (CGI), to create a visualisation of data?
Yes. Although the image of the moon used is made up of a mosaic of real images taken by the LRO.
PrognatusSeptem yes
PrognatusSeptem
Can you STOP doing THIS shit? It's ANNOYING
Going to believe that. Some of the other comments about untrue ... are crazy.
Can you answer why from 19 billion $ for a year you dont have one zooming from Huble telescope on earth ? If this are time laps pictures how you took them?
Are you stupid? Zooming in Earth from the Hubble, would be like looking at a basket ball from 1 inch distance with binoculars.
Do you know at what altitude the Hubble orbits???
is this a real video or cgi???
MIKE ZEROH watch it and find out...
What do you think?
Cgi based on real data. Watch the video dude
Just bad cgi one, firstly look at the moon, it's doesn't move ? this cant be because remember dude, world turn around 1000mph/h speed, and we will see same side moon always. If moon doesn't move you cant see a same side on earth.
CGI
I was wondering why I cannot see the new moon. I have looked through all types of lenses and feel that when it is between the sun and earth I should be able to see a dark ball in the sky. Why can I not see it?
gudtims4all Because you have been lied to at school. The earth is flat and stationery and the moon is a luminary and not a stupid dust ball.
Planet Plane channel: 200 Proofs that the earth is not a spinning ball.
Good luck my friend and God bless you.
@@ephesians6ten185 are you for real man? do you actually believe that?
@@stevenneo8970 Better question, why don't YOU also believe that?
@@HiddenSpaces23154Because I know how sunsets work.
no real footage never
Correct
Yes, there is real footage. You just haven't been paying attention and/or you are in such extreme denial that you wouldn't see it if it was placed right in front of you. (like the university professor who claimed that, even if one of the Apollo astroNOTs admitted that they never went to the Moon, he would still BELIEVE that we did -- two sides of the same coin, you and them)
Bill Dee - Ohh yeah this footage was as real as Santa Claus.
Since we have no reference it is literally impossible for anyone to know one way or the other whether it is real or not.
So you just have a BELIEF and/or a guess.
Bill Dee do you have a link to some real footage? I'm a NASA believer nut am curious to see some real hd footage
Why is there never any actual footage?
Because that's not the purpose of this video? Seriously, you can find tonnes of info on the far side. Why don't you go look at that?
BECAUSE NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN OUTSIDE
A Phillips “tons on info” were not looking for info we’re looking for videos which there never is any
@@thedeviluknow this video is too to show ya what can't see from earth, the dark side of the moon.
couse everything from nasa is fake and they will be better and better untill trying to lie more and more people
Pink Floyd was right: there is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact it's all dark (depending on where the sun is illuminating it in relation to your vantage point, but I guess that didn't fit in the song).
I never said I was frightened of dying.
As a matter of fact, in the background of the song near the end you hear a man say, "As a matter of fact, it's all dark."
Great, NOW where will I see you if the band I'm in starts playing different tunes?
Stupid science...
IstasPumaNevada Any time will do, I don't mind. Why should I be frightened of dying? There's no reason for it, you've gotta go sometime.
Its how it looks on the back. #Coyboyz4life
What about EPIC/DSCOVR using VISAR....
People seriously believe this edited video?
What do you mean, believe? What is there to believe?
Huh?
Thats not real moon you are seeing in the video
AngelArcha
He said that in the video...
Yes we believe this video "made possible by computer graphics". We also understand that there isn't any giant floating text either side of the moon. You have reached astronomical levels of stupidity.
Love your CGI images! When are you going to show real ones?
+Nirmal Khalsa When it's appropriate. The mechanics shown in this video would be impossible to illustrate otherwise.
+NASA Goddard what does that even mean? "when it's appropriate."
you do understand that there's a growing number of people who doubt the authenticity of... well, pretty much anything that NASA does. except of course, take money from taxpayers. that is a very real and noticeable thing NASA does. But put actual cameras in space to capture as video evidence all the things you claim to be doing? nope, too much to ask.
a 360° panning of the camera on the manned moon landing? nope, why do that, right?
unedited pictures of the earth and the moon? nope, that's inappropriate apparently.
hey... how is it that the earth is an oblate spheroid, yet the moon maintains a synchronized orbit?
it's okay friend, I don't expect an honest reply. well, until it's appropriate anyway.
+NASA Goddard nevermind the eristic running rampant on this thread, they choose ignorance over logic in a world of information.
No sir, we would choose actual evidence over artistic renditions. Ignorance stems from Not asking questions, and from accepting answers without any proof.
@@TheKingofSteves Brilliant response. Psalms 19:1 and Werner Von Braun and all those Nazis who founded NASA. WTF.
Can someone suggest me the what is the rotation speed of our earth..?????😕😕😕😕😕
At earth's equator it's about 1,000 miles per hour.
NASA... that's not what he was asking. The rotation speed of the earth is basically one revolution per day or 0.25 RPM (revolutions per minute. The "speed" is relative to one position on the earth.
Dont Start Noshit nether you or anyone else had recorded the earth not moving.
Dont Start Noshit you made a statement with no way of proving it. It was ignorance that prompted my response.
Dont Start Noshit
No the reason you can't tell me is because you simply don't know.
Do Earth and Moon actually appear to be so close together with any real practical camera? It seems that the moon is about to touch and fall onto the earth.
Yes, do it yourself with scale models and a zoom lens.
@@lehman hahahha dumbo, zoom lose quality from distance until u get just white :D noob
I can imagine someone making a lot of effort in doing the animations, lighting, and attaching LRO images on the Moon model. Unfortunately, I do not need to imagine the quality of RUclips comments on this fine video...
well done with the CGI
when can we see the real photos and footages?
@@hxcvocalist cgi i am from Europe
@@yt-user-dz996 You talk about evidence yet you conspiracy theorist have no evidence of anything you claim. You just swallow everything the opportunists tell you.
@@kamisa7362Condemnation without investigation is ignorance and ignorance is one of stupidities greatest symptoms. I'm here investigating both sides and the globe model is falling apart. Investigate it.
@@tinfoilfan4559 globe model is falling apart ?
what a joke
Key Words - Computer Graphics
+ImaFight Fan the only thing nasa can make...
+ImaFight Fan ...The other key word or phrase was "we are looking along the IMAGINARY line"...
+ImaFight Fan
The Moon is more beautiful on the side we see...
+ImaFight Fan : We want a Blender tutorial, perfect for beginners.
Based on accurate data....
May I use a portion of this video (just a few seconds) as a visual illustration in my video, I will provide the source of this video in my video.
Oui tu peux 👍👍👍
Hi, I wonder, is it possible to do a similar video to show the view from one of the Peaks of (almost) eternal light at thesouth pole (or north pole) with the Earth rising and setting? I think it would rise, describe a small arc, set, and return half a lunar month later and repeat the cycle, but each time rising in a different phase and going half way through the cycle of phases before setting. So it would be fascinating to see this for at least a year and would be nice if it could also do the 18.6 year and 8.65 year cycles so that it doesn't always rise and set in the same direction and sometimes spend more time above and sometimes more time below the horizon. Could be just with a flat horizon, and it would also be cool with a simulated horizon from e.g.a south pole terrain map around one of the favoured peaks of eternal light.
But just this one with the moon replaced by a horizontal lunar horizon would be great :).
Oh and it would be nice to have an unobtrusive day counter in one of the corners, could just be decimal days, to know where it is in the cycle.
Yeah with a real camera lol
What's that on the right of the moon at 00:40?
I came for the moon, but I stayed for the crazy people in the comments.
IF ONLY NASA SHOWED US THE REAL PHOTO'S OF THE MOON AND NOT THESE COMPUTER GENERATED PICS.
There's literally thousands of pictures from the LRO. Google it.
No they destroyed the pics
J I assume that you use a smart phone or digital camera to take pictures of your family and friends. Why do you bother? By your definition they're CGI, therefore not real.
How are they supposed to take photos? There's no air a few miles up. You need air for thrust, combustion and the ability to steer.
Jonny B guud you don’t need an atmosphere to maneuver a space craft. Conservation of linear and angular momentum applies everywhere. You don’t need air for combustion, either. The rockets have their own combustible fuel.
Рассказали б, почему прекратились полеты на луну) а то одни сплетни, научного отчета так и нет на эту тему..
how deep is the rabbit hole NASA ??
I seen a video from NASA that had a NASA scientist saying how to send ppl to mars, and said that with our current technology it would be almost impossible to go through the van allen radiation belts. So how the hell did we go through them to get to the moon and then again back to earth in 1969?????
Can you show the link to the video?
yea, I'm gonna have to find it first cause I actually seen it on the NASA cable channel but I'm sure it'll be on here somewhere.
I was actually shocked when the dude said what he said.
And he also said we can use shielding to protect the spacecraft.
yes, but if we already went threw the radiation belts way back in '69 then the shielding shouldn't even be an issue and they should already know exactly how to make it and with newer technology. so like I said, that shouldn't even be an issue. The way he's talking, shielding is a major issue. Also, why did he say that they never sent ppl threw them???....I'm not one of those ppl who doesn't think we went to the moon but, i'am starting to question it.
What software are u using.
plz tell me.
Renderman, I believe.
NASA Goddard
hmmmmm.
ok tell me the best space simulator excluding of Universal Sand Box 1 or 2..
Oh, I couldn't tell you that. I've played with Tiny Rockets, and a lot of people I know play KSP. I've even seen NASA missions blackboarded on there.
But NASA doesn't endorse any of these products.
NASA Goddard
Ok.
Advise me something to do because i have seen almost all movies about space and have a little bit knowledge about Nasa and space.
what should i do for Nasa.
I am very far from you.:-(
nasa ONLY makes CGI, i'm still waiting for their first real footage from space!
+Mediocre Monday You guys will always think it is CGI even it send real pictures,and it does send real pictures from the beginning of time.
+Mediocre Monday How will you recognize it if you see it?
Kreuzer Sixtysix I see that that the few pictures of the whole globe are fake. they are all composite images. nothing real about it. NASA even admits the are composite images!
+Mediocre Monday Even they make real pictures,you will still thinks it is CGI.
+Mediocre Monday It's not bad to question everything that you've never saw,but it's not good to say everything is wrong without finding your own evidences.
Why are the craters on the far side of the moon so much more homogenous that the near side? Is it simply coincidence, did the larger strikes on the near side have something to do with the side always facing us, or is it something else?
The video talks about the maria on the surface facing Earth. Earth's gravity helped cause lava to erupt from the Moon on the near side and fill in craters.
Steven Middleton Thank you! I must have missed that the maria were lava flows. I watched with the sound turned down because baby.
Why can't we have real video when countries have been supposedly going to outer space. How difficult could it be when we can clearly see the moon at night n day too. Why no dam close ups. Come on NASA u can do better. We can see milky ways n Mars but no moon. Huuum.
+Norlee Garcia There are lots of photos of the moon close up. Just go to NASA Apollo image gallery. www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/images.html or www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/22304920636/
You can see the moon. It's quite frequently visible if you divert your gaze upwars.
i dont remember what was taught in school but does the moon rotate like the earth does. or does it not spin at all? if someone knows for sure please answers this.
Edward Priebe The moon is in gravitational lock with the earth. One face is always pointing at the earth. It revolves around the earth in about 28, and rotates once in that same period. Cool animation to show: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking
thanks Mr. Gregory, some things we shouldnt forget but it happens. thanks for the link also, gona watch it. have good night.
I really can't believe that NASA are unable to show me the real thing!
You guys are idiots. I doubt you're even human.
Schizophrenic Enthusiast Never you mind
Tony Regan You believers in these conspiracies are the laughingstock of the world.
Keep sitting back in your corner with your tin foil hats and watch the whole world pass you by.
the nforcer The funny thing is that you assume I " take what I'm told on face value without independent investigation". Why do you assume I do the same thing you do ?
All your 'evidence' is based on conspiracies, that makes your 'evidence' meaningless.
The Blue Marble is a photo taken by the crew of Apollo 17 in 1972. There was no CGI in 1972. You can go on and on and try to prove your point of view, but you can't deny that photo is real, unless of course you bring up more conspiracies which makes your point utterly invalid.
When you can utterly prove beyond doubt that those photos are real, then I will believe it. Until then I keep an open mind, like any curious human being would.
Can Apollo 20 /#cigar ufo : finally be visible ?
fffake
Another amazing visualization by Goddard
Why do moon craters look as though they were all formed by impacts perpendicular to its' surface? The chances of the happening consistently must be extremely remote.
It's a valid question. I suppose it would have to do with gravitational pull exceeding vertical/horizontal momentum; sattelites paths intersecting the moon rather than it being hit by "flyby" objects, if that makes any sense. I'm just guessing, though.
Because when the meteor hits the surface it basically explodes in all directions equally.
Unless it's a really oblique angle, you're not going to see much difference. We do see those kinds of impacts too.
what a great question.. and if we are tidally locked then how ae there any on the the side of the moon facing uss, if the earth has been here the whole time
bushello yeah another good one too. I expect it didn't start out facing us constantly, it was probably a long process to end up where it is now.
"This is not the actual moon. It's a CGI replica of the moon. NASA will never let us know what lies on the far side of the moon." Thank you for saying what everyone is thinking Thane.
"They" actually let me move upstairs 🚀😸
It takes surprisingly little time to scroll down the comments and find the nutjobs... oh America
We Are All Inventions
Yes, you're right, dear. The world is also flat and the sun revolves around it!
Can't wait to visit!
Loooooool
Thankyou so much for this amazing view. My Grandad was born in the century before last ! He died in the third quarter of the 20th century. Imagine his parents being presented with the amazing knowledge we have today. Even he would have loved this film. It was him who showed me many things in nature. The secret places where birds nest, and squirrels slept. He also taught me about the moon, and how it moves.
Educate yourself.
I don't criticize that they don't have real picture, but they could at least mention the CGI is a representation of our current understanding of Earth and the Moon and may or may not be the full reality.
+yuryduarte That's totally explained in the "about" text. At least how this CGI was constructed.
+NASA Goddard It may be that you are asking way too much from the anti-NASA trolls, such as suggesting that they can read anything, much less the "about" text. And most of the 358 who voted "dislike" probably didn't even watch a minute of the upload.
+nano63a I'm not sure whether Earth is spherical or flat...but for sure it's not spinning..I believe the geocentric model was correct, and it makes more sense, I don't know why we changed it. That doesn't mean Earth is the center of the universe, but it should be the center of our system. I think it's time for NASA to consider all these possibilities.
You're all idiots lol
@nano63a You just gave a link to a book of linear algrebra hAhaHAH wtf dude.
i would like to see real stuffs.
You think we would have the technology but yet they won't show us, it's so annoying
Jim Wheeler What is annoying? Don't have the technology to see the things the way it is? Oh it is true... I am crazy about the universe... but, what about the huble?
+Denise Maria Branquinho talking about the dark side of the moon, Hub telescope is great cause it shoots out to the starts but we fly to the moon but I've never seen a clear picture of the other side just a computer generated image
+Jim Wheeler The phrasing of your sentence makes no sense.
thats a shame,thats ok, im asking to see the real image and not digitally done, real footage
Why are all NASA photos CGI? With that technology of space travel, I would think they could take a good, real picture.
+Reformed All time lapse is essentially CGI these days. Nobody's physically cutting film any more. The caption is very clear about how we assembled this visualization.
+NASA Goddard IT IS atotal waste of time to try to argue with the anti-NASA trolls. I Just block them, including "Reformed" and "SKIdru". YOu really need to do likewise
the nforcer don't raise kids please
NASA Goddard There is really no need to waste your time explaining these paranoid potheads. You just need to block them. C'mon, NASA, I know you can do better
He thinks Google Earth is one gigantic photograph.
Is this the real speed of rotation of Earth? Or is the Earth rotating around the moon??
I absolutely love how in the description it clearly says images were created which means Its CGI image...we have sent satellites to take pictures of Pluto and Saturn and mars but we can't get a real photo of the other side of the moon the image has to be created? makes no sence
We can't have a video like this without CGI, but we have a lot of still photos of Moons far side.
Since the moon is tidally locked to the Earth, does it mean the far side is actually lighter than the near side? If so can someone explain the phenomenon?
syncmaster915n sorry pal they can't see it... NASA is fake the earth is flat there's no such thing as SATs there all c.g.i please wake up you never see any stars
The center of mass of the Moon is offset from the absolute center of the Moon. The farside isn’t necessarily lighter than the nearside, the farside has a thicker crust than the nearside but the nearside, as you pointed out, has more dense volcanic material at the surface. The reason for the concentration of volcanic material on the nearside reflects early formation conditions of the Moon billions of years ago.
Thanks for the reply :) One more question, did the offset cause the moon to be tidally locked to the earth? Or what caused the moon or any other space bodies (eg. Mercury) to be tidally locked?
syncmaster915n When moon formed it was in molted state and and was very close to earth. Earth tidal forces deformed it with permanent bulge due to small variations in the gravity at different points on the moon resulting in tidal locking and pointing this permanent bulge towards earth. Since tidal bulge on earth is dragged east of moon, the tidal force of moon tries to align it. This in fact tries to slow down earths rotation and this loss in angular momentum is thus transferred to moon resulting in receding of the moon @3.5 cm per year.
computer images exactly what I expected.....where's all the real time videos or real pictures?
Same thing ive always been wanting to know. These computer images are becoming ridiculous
Where's Syd? I don't see him there.
Why can't we see actual vids/pics?
There are plenty. This video right here happens to discuss another topic.
There are many but this video helps us to visualise better
Because you're not looking for them.
That's Awesome!! Love that graphics!! :D
Why computerized images and not the REAL thing? For crying out loud, WE have images of Pluto and all we get is CGI!!? COME ON NOW!!
pluto is cgi tho
Because non-visual sensors can produce higher quality topographical data, which can then later be visualized. Is that really so difficult to understand?
Pluto... now with added pluto.. look at the shape on it.. disney have ypur mind and nasa has your tongue!! Wake up!!
It's 1000 miles per hour at equator about 1,650 kilometers per hour that's rotation speed and Earth's revolution speed is 1,07000 kilometers per hour
"Made possible by computer graphics"
so what?
This freaking helps us to visualise better. Jeez
I have been trying to looking for the video that show all planets of our solar system relating to our Milky Way galaxy : axis, direction of the rotation, trajectory
Very nice, thanks for sharing :)
I can only imagine what we will discover in the next 10 years. So excited for this.
Nothing 😂
Amazing. That is NASA class.
The first ever picture of the far side was made in 1959. NOT by NASA. But by the Soviets. The Luna 3 spacecraft.
there is a back side to the moon no ones ever seen it. the moon is also transparent. just a flat disc possibly a light bulb
It looks real but it doesn't look like a rock
whats music in video
Magically the camera is now gonna make the Earth shrink and clouds never move on Earth!! 😂😂😂😂😂
As it says in the description, this is CGI, there is no camera. Also, they have rendered the scene from two different perspectives, so of course the size changes.
Why even bother explaining anything to the flat earth people with there magical dome covering the flat earth. I have never actually seen oxygen with my eye's so it doesn't exist and we don't need are lungs either. They come to sites like this to meet up with others of there kind to try and feel human because they could never grasp how things actually work. So they live in a big terrarium with the magical cover to keep all the oxygen in that you can't see. And God will take care of them for ever and ever! I believe in God. He sure can do better then a domed flat earth...and He did! Peace
All of this representation did not go to the moon
?
That sure is quite a difference in size of the earth between the normal and wide angle lens. I also like how the moon stayed the same size. That is some special lens they got there. I guess they must have used a wide angle lens when taking the "earth from moon photos" from the apollo missions, given that the earth size matches the size in those photos.
This is an animation. Not to scale.
ANY REAL FOOTAGE OF THIS?
Earth is flat, the fact that this video is based on imaginary graphics, means you have absolutely no clue about how the moon looks from the other side, since you have no REAL video to prove it.
mini miny exactly.
+Evan Pragliola
In a shockingly manner of fact, they really do, my friend.
First I also can't believe it. o.O
+mini miny obvious troll is obvious
"Earth is flat" Where is your photo of the edge of the earth? Where is the evidence of the people who tried to reach it? Keep believing in your imaginary god, kid.
Smeif Chapman fuck you globetard
Jose Escamilla I'd love to hear your thoughts on this video! :)
Where are the alien bases???
Amusing how the USSR's Luna 3 wasn't credited for first photographing the far side in 1959.
Flat earthers gone wild in comment section
0:25 so NASA... is that a real view ??? or just a computer graphics coz something is wrong with that 50 year gap of no humans put again on moon...can we put some live cam on moon or somethink??? or just another 'computer graphics' hmmm ???
The reason people haven't gone back to the moon is because NASA's funding was immediately cut to about an 8th of what it was during Apollo.
the Greeks figured out the earth was spherical 2,000 years ago. y'all have nearly limitless information at your fingertips and choose to believe the absolutely least factually supportive and conceptually sound idea ever, the flat earth. incredible.
:)
Can one see stars from standing on either side of the moon?
The 3 astronauts that went to the moon in 1969 were asked the same question by the reporters. They appeared to be very troubled by the question and didn't give a convincing answer.
Doesn't the new claim that the Earth is supposedly pear shaped falsify this and everything NASA has done up to this point? Yes, I think it does.
Doesn't the new claim that Staple's yard sticks are actually 1.021 yards falsify every claim that Staples has made up to this point?
the earth bulges in the middle like a middle aged man. Im sure pilots would have trouble following the flight plan if it was. not to mention two tides that the earth rolls under would be fucking extreme if we were pair shaped man
Then you're a fool. The "pear shape" of the Earth is a few kilometers or about 0.3% of the radius. Don't people like you ever check anything for themselves before displaying their ignorance?
The pear shape isn't noticeable.
Wheres the American flag on the moon? Or any signal that they landed anytime?
NASA is CGI expert...
+bikash31 Clearly not an expert
awesome...had to hang on to my seat...epic footage and completely inspiring
and still we can't see the ficitious lunar lander docking station from '69?
Wow! Thanks for sharing! That was a very interesting view and good look at all those craters!
I liked 2001 a space odyssey better.
Made me laugh out loud,that was awesome
Very nicely done.
Awesome, We have finally seen the "other side" of the moon... Like it doesn't look like the side we already see... Also this video is just computer animation its not real...So this isn't even the real "other side" of the moon. Its all just imagination still.
It's a composite of images taken by LRO used in an animation.
It's an image based on real data. It's not made up. And you thought it'd look different to the side we can see? Why would it?
why Clouds do not move on Earth ? is this a CGI or what ?
Yes they said in beggining
Where are the stars NASA?
+Scott Enow This is a simulation. Therefor we are simulating how you wouldn't see any stars from this perspective, with the brilliance of sunlight reflecting off the Earth and the Moon.
Ok I realised that after I commented, however we should be able to get actual footage not a simulation. We have satellites out that far, its just a matter of attaching a camera.
#stoplyingnasa
we don't have any satellites beyond the moon. but actual images taken by LRO are easily available at nasa.gov/lro
Where is Syd?
amazing and so interesting.
wow!
Anubis De León lol
What's the name of the Darude-Sandstorm in this video? It's quite calming
yeah right!!!🤣😂😂😂
Yes. Could you elaborate?
Is that the real earth time lapsed in the back? The clouds don't change. Why?
No, it's a computer image.
The video said it was a "'time-lapse telescopic view made possible by computer graphics". ?????!! What does that mean? So it's NOT a time-lapse telescopic view. It's Photoshop fakery? Why don't you publish a real video and put the Flat-Earthers to rest?
They're showing us a computer-generated view because no real video view of the same thing exists. (In fact, if you consider the two viewpoints they use, getting a real video of the same thing would be nearly impossible.)
+flymasterA, man they can't !! That's why they don't. It's not hard to understand. Now- if you want to not believe in the flat earth, go on believing that ships sail on the side of the earth and even go as far as sailing upside down, as stupid as it sounds, on a flat earth, ships could also sail on the side of the earth too. Better get your globe and and really do a comparison, on the side is on the side no matter how you define it. And maybe while yer at it spin the flat earth to create GrAVITay liken the ball earth. So the water won't go a flying off.
I honestly don't trust Nasa since the infamous smudging of first few good pictures of the moon for some weird reason.
in under a minute I have to stop and comment. riddle me this : why is the earth a moon sized object in the apollo photos and not taking up most of the lunar skyline?
this cgi is from NASA and reflects what we could expect to see in objective terms from this vantage point in space so imagine how big the earth would look if you are standing on top of it there.
and moving on to the videos end many will say "oh wide angle lens that's why.."
oh no you don't.. no no no. lol who cares anymore?
No. This video is not intended to be precisely to scale. If you want to see a real perspective from a million miles out, check out: ruclips.net/video/DMdhQsHbWTs/видео.html
Tommy X Lourdes The Earth's radius is about 4 times the Moon's, so if you stand on the Moon it will look about 4 times as wide as the Moon does from the Earth. (Which is to say, about 2 degrees wide.)
Nice cartoon
Bob Burns its not a cartoon
I'm surprised the logo at the end of the video has a "beeping" satellite. I think we all know there is no sound in space.
B/S
No, just real life.
do cameras not work in space? we don't want cgi, we want real photos.
Deeply potmarked with craters.. Last defence against asteroids.
Why don't you give us some real photos.??????????. also some photos of earth from a distance that are not more than 40 years old. please
Nice CGI ...
Where is the new real HD photograph of moon from hubble telescope + adaptive optics?
Neat
Fake
Yes, it is a CGI model built from the lunar orbiter data.
N.A.S.A. = Not Always Scientifically Accurate
Okayyy....
Liers...They say Moon rotates on its axis but on every presentation it does not move an inch..
The "camera" is essentially rotating with the moon as it orbits the Earth. It's the same phenomenon that causes us to only see one side of the Moon from Earth - tidal locking.
NASA Goddard Too many coincidences to be true..Sun is 400 times more distant then Moon so they look they are same size..Moon is rotating so perfect synchronized that we can not see other side...Sun works exactly with tehnology that we use..Solar system is flat in such a big space..And all that from explosion called Big Bang from nothing?
Alfred White It is not possible but in video editing studios everything is possible..:)
+Goran Bozovic "...from nothing."
straw man
the earth doesn't change either. Look at the weather patterns. According to this video the clouds stay the same for ~5 days.
So your telling me the machine taking photos of the moon is stationary at all times. No effect from gravity?
I would not believe anything NASA says, that is all.
Why not? Could you elaborate?
Beautifully presented.
An okay CGI demo... Is it for an upcoming Hollywood blockbuster?
it's cool that NAZA now officially went into doing sci-fi... after all their whole racket isn't going to go anywhere else since the US establishment is about to get served.
It's to illustrate what the dark side of the moon looks like. That can't be done with pictures.