Political Ideology: Crash Course Government and Politics #35
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2015
- So today Craig is going to look at political ideology in America. We're going to focus on liberals and conservatives and talk about the influencers of both of these viewpoints. Now, it's important to remember that political ideologies don't always perfectly correspond with political parties, and this correspondence becomes less and less likely over time. So, sure we can say that Democrats tend to be liberal and Republicans tend to be conservative, but we're not going to be talking about political parties in this episode. It's also important to note, that there are going to be a lot of generalizations here, as most peoples' ideologies fall on a spectrum, but we're going to try our best crosses fingers to summarize the most commonly held viewpoints for each of these positions as they are used pretty frequently in discussions of American politics.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: / pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: www.voqal.org
All attributed images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 4.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - / youtubecrashc. .
Twitter - / thecrashcourse
Tumblr - / thecrashcourse
Support Crash Course on Patreon: / crashcourse
CC Kids: / crashcoursekids
Bruh are we really here arguing politics when this guys has clearly discovered cloning
Right?
TheRenownedReviewer our focus is seriously misguided see become a true Craigest and you too shall get to he big issues in life.
Cloning is against my political ideology. All clones are created equal!
Liberals should be rounded up and shot in the head.
@@leekenyon5137 Whilst I am not a liberal, I do not think they should be killed for being liberal.
I'm a hardcore Craigist
when I saw the word craigist, my mind jumped to craigslist
Craigists are often confused with Craigslistists
+NiLowther Craigslisters, maybe?
+Lyndon Rainey this is the only comment of any sense in this war of the word roses. all hail the craign! punch an eagle now!
+Flywheel Shyster Bernie Sanders aint got shit on Craig! #FeelMyFist
How is it when I see this video I think "Hey both sides have valid points and values"
Then I watch a debate and lose brain cells.
Becuase people like drama and propaganda more than actual compromises and forward thinking
Cuz both liberalism and conservatism are trash, socialism ftw
@@brauljo No😂
@@brauljo it doesnt work😂
roni Mitchell Capitalism doesn’t work 😂😉💦👌👋👍🤙🙈😅🧠🤷♂️🤦♂️🤯🥳🤣
"Jewish people are amongst the most liberal americans"
Ben Shapiro: hold my beer...
According to statistics and demographics they are.
It, however, remains true that the Israeli government is strongly conservative, but again is not America.
@@Thor.Jorgensen What does Israel have to do with American Jews?!!
I don't know what that means but I like how it sounds
@@sheena_. Do you mean other than the fact that right-wing conservatives and Israeli Jews, alike, like to call American Jews "Fake Jews" or "antisemitic" because of their tendency to lean toward the liberal left in regards to American conservatives' unconditional and unwavering support of Israels' right-wing, fundamentalist government?
You mean milkshake. Beer is sinful.
whoa that was pleasantly unbiased.
+Confuzzled Tomato There was still quite a bit of bias, but it was rather more neutral than it could have been, towards both sides of the left/right divide. I wish he actually bothered addressing the authoritarian/libertarian divide as well, instead of continuing to push the "left right political line" concept further.
+Kain Yusanagi yea me too. Most young people (like me) don't really understand the economic difference between left and right (for example: who's fault is the recession in 2008), but it's lot easier to understand the difference between authoritarianism and libertarianism.
Exactly what I was about to comment. It's actually a nice breath of fresh air.
+Confuzzled Tomato I disagree, I think it was to a certain degree biased towards conservative, but that may be because i'm from Norway, and the most right-wing politicians here are barely right enough to be compared to American liberals.
MerkRampage Confuzzled Tomato you think this video was close to being unbiased? What a joke. Please get some education
Wow, for once a video about politics that went out of its way to separate bias from fact. Brilliant!
Crash Course is a beautiful thing.
Daniel .DeRuyter Yeah I actually liked this one, I was expecting it to be like most videos where it’s really obviously biased but this was quite factual and tried to be fair to both sides and not have a bias when explaining it, I actually liked quite well how he explained my ideology, and that is extremely rare from most sources claiming to be unbiased.
love it
In terms of the whole fact-thing, I'm quite annoyed by the comment about liberalism and progressivism. I understand the head-itchingly stupid, ideologically illiterate definitions of liberalism and conservatism because it's meant to be about american politics. But considering that "progressive" is probably a more historically accurate label than "liberal" (If nothing else, at least it actually means the opposite of conservatism), so the comment about liberals re-branding as progressives is kinda strange.
All men and woman are haters and all men and woman are bias claiming otherwise is being dishonest with yourself and others.
Fun fact: the terms right and left cane from the French Revolution. When deciding what government the French people should have, the conservatives were seated on the right, the liberals were sitting on the left
Comments:
5%: "this video was unbiased"
5%: "let's just get along ok"
90%: "this comment section is a damn WAR!"
The video was super biased.
Shiv Spotz-Parihar I’m really not seeing any bias
@@ohyeahyeah3064 he just wants to say that to start a war in the comments
Kade Daivis i know the comments are made for people to discuss the video
But I have seen I ton of comments saying that this video is biased and no reasoning
Or even what side it’s biased too
@Kade Daivis I'm not saying having arguments is bad I'm just saying that some people just start arguments for no reason but just to piss people off
I know no one cares, but I just want to say that when I have kids, I don't want them to adopt their political ideology based on mine, regardless of it's for or against mine. I want my kids and my grandkids to arrive at their own conclusions. And I also want to create a family atmosphere, where we can talk about our political views regardless if they clash or not.
That's sad to hear because kids are such open minds that teachers will take advantage and brainwash them for you. It might be a liberal teacher or conservative. For example, I would definitely take advantage. Think of the saying, if you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.
@ng da you don't need to bring in your political views to teach right from wrong, though these concepts might be rooted in and/or correlate with political views. I believe, that kids should be trained in formal logic and critical thinking and be exposed to as much philosophy, literature and history as possible. That will make them capable of synthesising their own political, economical, social and moral views.
I admire that highly. Still provide an unbiased perspective on politics religion on society etc. so that they may come to a conclusion when they’re able to comprehend the world around them. Educating them would help them understand I believe and by creating an environment of communication as you suggest would allow for that to be nurtured and further develop.
Not me, the only reason I can see for having kids is for them to help bring to fruition my manifesto instead of it just being me, alone, scribbling it on to a cave wall with a piece of charcoal.
No, my way of thinking is logical so I want my kids to be logical thinkers as well therefore they will most likely follow my political views. It will make for less stressful holiday dinner when they get older
Liberal ❎
Conservative ❎
Gamer ☑️
Yes we will eventually out number them and replace all of the government with VRs and be T Posing as a high five. Our plan is fool proof .
Gaymers.
hell yeah.
That would be awesome 😂😂
Eeeeey gamer :3 >:))) i dont support it
Liberals: Equality
Conservatives: Liberty
Me: Why not both
Depends on what is meant by equality. Equality of opportunity is good but equality of outcome is terrible
@@Avr23 So equality of opportunity. I would say in the U.S. we are pretty good at that. Gay marriage is legal and POC are afforded the same rights as whites.
comment thief
The problem of equality is if everyone was equal then there would basically be no point in living since if one person becomes better than another than it ruins the whole idea of equality. Liberty is where you start in the same position and branch off depending on the choices you make.
@@gloriousgamers6172 don't get equality confused with equity. And whether or not there is a point or purpose to living shouldn't be the source of your argument. You can't say for sure. Humans are creative
In conclusion, politics and people confuse me.
nononononono.... Not the comment section on a video about politics. nonono. Please, God no.
my opinion = logic. your opinion = hitler and slavery.
That basically covers anything that would be discussed on politics.
Grow up.
its a bucket of chicken so wouldnt it be more suitable to say mold?
I agree, like the video and leave, avoid people who believe their opinions are facts.
This was brilliantly unbiased. I love how he explained both sides from a biased point of view to kinda cancel out bias for either side. Amazing.
Ehh no he should have spoke about authoritarianism and not just libertarianism
I'm really in the middle I guess..i hope we get rid of this two party system soon.
@Spik Man Be careful what you guys wish for because without a choice of two parties you get authoritarianism. Just like the one Party system in North Korea.
Brett McNear I think he meant that he wants more than two parties...? Right?
@@genas6703 Yeah maybe you're right, maybe I misread it.
@Spik Man then what should we get. 5 or more parties?
Personally, I'm centre right, I can see both sides but I lean more towards conservative. I totally agree with you, why don't they create a center wing political party that has views everyone can at least respect. Or create a new version of the Democratic and Republican party.
Politics are weird af
The Australian paradox: Our "Liberals" are the conservatives.
+TVFILMBUFF austrailia does everything upside down :)
+TVFILMBUFF Liberal meaning "Economically Liberal" as it meant back when the party was created.
+TVFILMBUFF "Socialists" in America appropriated the words liberal and progressive because socialism isn't openly polite. Australians are historically CORRECT in their use of the word liberal. And, conversely, conservative is a word that no longer has any relationship with what it meant right up into the 20th century.
You know statists are completely off in their use of the word liberal because I've actually heard them reference Marx as a liberal (shudder)
+TVFILMBUFF It's not paradox. Classical Liberalism= free trade, low taxes, democracy and rule of law. For example, classical (right-wing) liberal can be oppose to illegal immigration or gay marriages.
You mean Liberals everywhere except America are Conservatives.
My hatred toward the two party system grows..
Tristan McCoy It’s unbelievable. In the US you’re either right or left, Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative. This two party political system basically polarizes the population and discourages free thinking.
“Oh, I’m a Republican therefore I must agree with all Republicans on topics X, Y, and Z.”
The point is, people can disagree with both liberals and conservatives. It’s called independent thinking.
In Australia, we have many political parties but media (Rupert Murdoch) makes sure that only two are ever given a chance at winning. Actually these days it's completely biased towards one party, which is our equivalent of the Republican party, which is ironically called the Liberal Party.
I mean it wasnt designed to be. The first past the post system push us to be voting for the two popular parties on both side unless we want our vote to be wasted .
Yes George Washinston actually warned in his farewell address against a true party city. Most people tend to be liberal about somethings and conservatives about other things.
@@siriusb7346 The Democrats aren't even Leftists, they're Centerists.
This comment will be a little biased (as I am left-leaning) but I think that one of the reasons people tend to dislike conservatives is because they come off as self-centered people that entrust god with everything and don't really care to listen and analyze other people's ideals.
In order to achieve equality we can't ignore that there are such differences. We need to realize these disparities exist and try to work together in order to fix them. We can't ignore the differences between black and white people, between men and women and between LGBT members and straight people. We need to acknowledge these differences and do everything we can to make sure everyone can live the life they wish and that they aren't discriminated for it.
That is why we aren't going anywhere with either communism or fascism. We need to find a good balance to make things work.
I know it is easier said then done, but we need to start small and grow from there.
5:17 but B E N S H A P I R O
In my experience, Orthodox (most religious) Jews and Israeli Jews tent to be more conservative, while conservative (between religious and secular) and reform (secular) Jews tend to me more liberal. Ben Shapiro is Modern Orthodox, while the majority of American Jews are reform or conservative. This is not always true, but in most cases I’d say it is.
All you need to know is my -ology is the best -ology. All other -ologies are garbage.
+Gareth Dean Well my -ism is the best -ism and it's better than the other -isms and your stupid -ology!
+Vanalovan I would, but your -ology has ruined the country! If only my -ology could run things without your -ologists messing it up, our country would be Great again!
+Joseph Schmitz Your -ism's a doxoy and not even an ortho- one at that. Fie on you!
+Gareth Dean It's funny that people actually talk like this in real life with a strait face.
Information769
Funny and sad. You also get 'Your thing is -ology. And -ology is bad. So your thing is bad.' Does anyone know what socialism is anymore? What about what the Nazis did?To hear it it was anything from vegetarianism to flag waving.
I like that Conservative Clone sounds eerily similar to Ron Swanson.
Ron Swanson's actually supposed to be a libertarian.
True but still way more conservative that any liberal
+Todd Libertarians are very conservative... As in, constitution to the letter and no more!
+benaldo138 It certainly depends, you do have those "Constitutionalists" who principally are Conservative [i.e., supporting positions ubiquitously coined 'Conservative' - economic liberalism, weak federal governance, parochial power etc.] Though I wouldn't generalize, Libertarians in a American context is a very muddled label [frankly all over the world] as you have demonstrated. To start you have 'Anarcho-Capitalists', these "Libertarians" are more _extreme_ if you will than Moderate Right-Wing Libertarians such as Rand Paul. And far more "radical" than 'Fiscal Conservatives' .
On the "left" you have an ample amount of "Libertarians", like for example: "Libertarian Marxists", "Anarcho-Communist", "Anarcho-Syndicalist" and "Libertarian Socialists". Similar to those on the "right" these individuals desire an enfeeble government, and/or total abolition of the state. All of these people are described as "Ultra-Left", "Radicals" or "Revolutionaries".
Now if I omitted some labels I do apologize, and if I was ostensibly unfair to either "right" or the "left" I apologize.
P.S: I personally view Nazism as 'Ultra-Right-wing', Hitler described Nazism as "syncretic". Clearly Socialism is universally associated with the "Left", however within the context of Nazism, Socialism was relegated . Nazi Germany did not attempt to implement Socialism, Hitler and his inner circle coupled with the Capitalists, domestically and abroad. So if anything Hitler, though opposing Capitalism himself, could be described as left-wing economically, but socially his was very much an 'Ultra-Rightist'.
And his social views had a preponderance within his regime.
P.S (2): Also radicalism and extremism isn't appalling in it of itself, some ideas that may be produced from these _extremists_ leanings may work, they just happen to be out of the mainstream. That goes for the "left" and the "right".
P.S (3): Also regarding the "Left" libertarians some of the labels are often conflated and arguably they could be reasonably done so. But they do have their unique quarks and distinctions.
[Edit (1): P.S (4): Regarding 'Moderate' Right-Wing Libertarians such as Rand Paul, these people are 'Libertarian Statist' or more congruently 'Libertarian Minarchist'.]
+Todd which is a conservative ideology.
This whole video just told me that i agree with some of both liberal and conservative sides...
I feel like I'm neither one or the other... But to vote i gotta be a part of one or the other...
Whew... This is tough
A LIBERAL
You don't have to be a part of either, you could just be an independent. There are also other smaller political parties like libertarianism or socialism for example.
thank you for calling it "american liberalism"
In Europe "Liberal" means economic liberal, and is generally considered centrist or centre-right. They support unregulated free economies while also being liberal in social issues. So similar to American Libertarians, but not as crazy, and more grounded in their ideology. The Left-wing in Europe is known as "Social Democracy". They grew from the laboyur movement and support labour unions, and today they support Government programs to address issues, regulation of the Capitalist economy and are generally Progressive in social issues.
+OneManArmy Thank you for sharing the view from some of"all the green parts of Non-America".
+OneManArmy Not necessarily. In Britain we have the Liberal Democrats, and whilst the Liberal party before the merger were considered on the economic right, a 'brand' of Liberalism emerged called Social Liberalism. These believe in social liberty, but economic regulation in favour of personal and consumer rights. The Liberal Democrats sit both sides of the economic spectrum, but since Tim Farron took over as leader, it's fair to say we're a centre-left party now. So I identify as a Liberal, and am on the left of the economic spectrum, but I wouldn't identify as a Liberal in the American sense.
+OneManArmy However, like in American politics, most of the time they don't actually follow their ideologies and instead do whatever they need to to stay in power.
Europe has different kinds of left and right-wing too. There are plenty of religious rightwingers, pure socialists (not to be confused with social democrats), green parties, anti-immigration parties, labor parties, and many more. There is a high diversity of political parties compared to the US.
+OneManArmy Same case in Australia where our far left party is The Greens, centre-left the Labour Party (American Liberal) as well as minor parties on that side like the Liberal Democrats and with the right of center being held by the Coalition which is a consortium of the Liberal Party and the National Democrats. We also have/had the party Palmer United Party but no one really knows what the fuck they stand for as it essentially fell apart after it won a balance of 6 seats out of 33 in the Senate (essentially holding the balance of power votes).
And our election system is very different to the American version, i believe most EU and the UK have a similar preferential system to that used here in Aus
+ohrightthatswhy European Liberalism exists in many flavours. Social Liberalism is one of them and usually considered centre-left. That's why the Liberals in Germany (the FDP) are considered a centre party. Some of them are more on the left, others more on the right, but they all share the same core values.
I'm a conservative, but neither ideology is perfect.
I agree
I m kind of conservative i am conservative in the moral and ethical way but i hope i am wrong but for me theese fanatical leftists has gone too far in their crazy demoralization of society some of them even are calling for peadophilia acceptance so i think that a democracy wouldnt work but we need a strong goverment a dictartoraship of some kind if you will
André Venturelli Liberals aren’t calling for pedophilia acceptance - in fact, they are rebuked by the act of pedophilia in and of itself. It’s just that with recent advancements in the fields of psychology and neural imaging, they’ve discovered physical deformities in the pedophile brain’s physical structures. This indicates that the issue of sexual attraction to children may very well be one borne of human mental illness in a significant number of individuals often mistakenly deemed as irreversibly and inherently evil by society.
It's in their name, really... All ideologies are, well, idealistic.
@Hunter Thompson libertarianism means that big buisness controls every thing we depend on. A fear of govorment is rational, but the way to make sure that it doesnt happen isnt trusting agropolies to make decision that efect everyone (witch was the best point against full govorment control of the economy, a thing no liberal agrees with), its making a govorment that represent the people.
With all due respect to all parties, I’m only curious but why is protecting the environment and taking care of people even if it mean sacrificing some of our money to taxes? If i can be of service to others, I’d be more than happy to pay more taxes.
This was so great! Loved the humor haha
Same!
That's interesting... I respect and admire my parents and completely disagree with their politics
+JMan #feelthebern
+James Craver Dude, Lincoln Chafee all the way #feelthechafe
+Sam Belanger LOL that was funny.
+James Craver Same here. Very interesting.
+James Craver He was talking about what generally what happens, there are always exceptions.
Conservatives: Liberty
Liberals: equality
Me: why not both?
+SirVolcy Because you have to limit freedom to create equality. Some people don't want a bunch of people with guns telling them what to do and how to think and what is right and wrong. True freedom is the freedom to succeed or fail on your own merit. Conservatives don't blame people when they fail, they blame themselves and try again. Liberals blame other people, and cry about how life isn't fair, so they get the guys with guns to force everyone to value them. That's not freedom, that's state slavery. If everyone is equal, everyone is poor. See the USSR, China, any other far left nation, etc.
+TheClassicalSauce There are different kinds of equality. I believe in equality of opportunity and equality under the eyes of the law, but trying to force equality on gender and race is a fever dream. I am against quotas for minorities and women because to me that is extremely racist and sexist; having lower standards for them doesn't make them more equal it's just condescending as fuck. I believe people should be judged based on the content on their character, skills, and achievements.
TheClassicalSauce that's actually false. You don't not have to limit freedom to create equality. When liberals talk about equality, what usually is meant is equality of opportunity, socially, and under the law. We clearly do not have that. I do admit that some legislation is misguided in an attempt to fix this, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't do anything. If a person fails on their own merit, they failed on their own merit. Everyone knows that life isn't fair. However the big issue with conservative boot strap theory is that they forget that some people don't have boots in the first place.
TheClassicalSauce there is no absolute freedom just like there is not absolute equality. That doesn't mean the two cannot coexist to a degree.
TheClassicalSauce no there isn't. That's why laws exist. You aren't free to slander, you aren't free rape, you aren't free to take my property. And yes they do come at the expense of each other in some degree.
By the way, to whoever is reading this and thinking "well I don't much like liberalism or conservatism", there are more than two political ideologies out there.
Do you really love capitalism and really hate the state? (American) libertarianism could be for you
Do you think that capitalism is pretty destructive and that it should be controlled as much as possible? Social democracy could be your game
Do you think capitalism is *really* bad for people? You could always try socialism
Do you hate capitalism and also hate the state? You could go for libertarian socialism (which is actually where the term libertarian originated as a political ideology)
You can have markets without capitalism, you can have markets without the state, you can have capitalism without the state, you could have a strong state and heavy capitalism, you could have capitalism intertwined with the state!
That's not even to get into the social aspects of different positions
I mean you've got fascists, anarchists, ancaps, Leninists, syndicalists, populists, progressives, reactionaries, the list goes on. American politics cannot do justice to the nuances of political theory.
What about Europe's side of political theory aside Monarchy.
What? social democracy doesn't think that capitalism is destructive and that control should be as much as possible lmao, That would be democratic socialism at least, social democracy adapts capitalism to a mixed, more "human" system. The difference between a liberal (not the american conservative definition) and a social democrat is that the first says that the market is better at solving problems and should be regulated by the state when necessary, and the second says that the state is better at solving problems and should be liberalized(?) when necessary, its the two sides of the same coin at the center of the political spectrum.
you forgot craigist in your list
I'm a liberal, hello my fellow conservative colleagues!
VMG_RATTPACK hello
Heeeeeeeeey
Lol gross
Wassup
howdy, but thats an odd way to say hello to conservatives watching the video,
the words conservative and liberal, due to the modern media and political system, are virtually meaningless. There are liberal republicans and conservative democrats, but apparently these two ideologies define the parties? What? Two Party systems are fucking stupid.
The two party system is terrible. It's created by our voting systems however. #alternativevoteFTW
+MrJethroha Parties got fucked up by money, virtually all political parties are actually liberal and have no interest in reducing their size or spending. However, government parties that claim to be conservative tend to put out campaigns that appeal to conservatives and pay lip service to conservative views, even though they have no intention of actually putting them in place. Of course, dishonesty exists on openly liberal parties too, as Obama has proven quite eloquently.
We have more then two parties. It's just that we only ever vote for the two because all other parties are made up of extremists from the left and right.
+MrJethroha Vote Libertarian!
See folks? Neither side is completely wrong.
+Vhailor Mithras But some are more wrong than others.
+Vhailor Mithras If we're having the discussion such that "sides" are even under consideration, that's a pretty sure sign everything is wrong.
+Vhailor Mithras finally a voice of reason.
tajniak4 except for the conservatives
Me,watching this.
So what's the answer?
I know a lot of student's watching this to answer their module.
coming from a conservative, this was very well made and educationally factual, unbiased video. Glad my school still teaches this to me. ^_^
@SteelStranger 8857 Why do you hate America and white people?
@@ottoiofgreece7585 Y'all are more toxic then my schools cafeteria food
@@ottoiofgreece7585 let's just say 5:17 has something do with it...
Libertarianism: Fiscally conservative, and socially not giving a damn.
And economically liberal ;) fiscal refers only to government spending.
Owlblocks David Libertarians are economically conservative as well. They are against regulations against businesses and are for flat tax despite individual income.
That's called economic liberalism. Liberal = free. Fiscally conservative (government doesn't spend liberally) and economically and socially liberal (laisses faire for both).
Owlblocks David Libertarians are for small government overall. Less spending, less tax, less power. Which gives the people power. Socially they lean liberals, except pro guns, but economically they are conservative. Because we want less tax and regulation.
Less taxation and regulation is economic liberalism. I don't think you understand what liberalism is.
this is really good to explain both sides of the spectrum
This video is incredible. It is so greatly unbiased. I shouldn’t have to hear anyone’s opinion on history when I just want to learn the history. Great job
That was perfect in describing what LIBERAL & CONSERVATIVE mean. I am personally a Conservative/libertarian former U.S. Marine. It seems 90% of all media has a hardcore liberal bias. You were really fair and balanced. Thank you. I just subscribed to CRASH COURSE and will tell all my friends to subscribe to you.
Liberty/Freedom is the most important value. Others being Life, and Property. 'Equality' is possible because of such values.
I respect your opinion and value your contribution to making the world a better place, and acknowledge that you desire to see the country be the best it could be. However, I disagree. Without some form of equality of opportunity, true Freedom is impossible, as our circumstances can artificially restrict our choices.
Erik Zamudio equality is a vague term because in my opinion conservatives support equal opportunity while liberals support equal outcome
Momo Marsh well said
I just had to comment
I think it would have been interesting to mention that younger people tend to be liberal, often becoming Conservative later in their life, and where this comes from.
Aparently this is statistically untrue.
I know what Winston Churchill said, but it doesn't actually seem true according to most surveys.
Marven Corrielus really? Wouldn't Conservatives be already extinct if that was untrue?
Franz Ferdinand if the first part was true and the second part wasn't. Neither trend are statistically supported.
There were plenty of conservative young people in the 80's and 90's who are conservatives now.
As someone who's dipped into a bit of political science before, I have issue with how Americentric this video is. Liberalism in general means supporting individual freedoms and largely being against government control over it's peoples (think classical/social liberals), and conservatism in general means being supportive or protective of older traditions and values.
Yeah, it doesn't make much sense to me either. A liberal is supposed to be someone who's open to new ideas while a conservative is supposed to be someone who's more into keeping traditional values. I guess both sides kind of adopted which one suited them the most. Calling a right-winger a Republican and a left-winger a Democrat isn't technically right but whatever, it's 2019 I guess lol
It's weird in America because here our founding values are Liberalism, and thus are, in a way, the older traditions and values now for our society. We have a trend of very slowly increasing government control throughout our existence, and the more we increase government control, the more we risk pushing away from classic Liberalism, making classical liberals react conservatively against increases of power. This is not to say that all conservatives are classic liberals or that people in the modern day left cannot be classical liberals, simply that as we move towards more government, where classical Liberalism falls on the range of common ideologies shifts more and more to the conservative side since Liberalism is our old traditional ideology in America.
The entire series is about American government, it's Americentric by definition. If you saw the Party Systems video, you'd know the Gilded Age and the Great Depression kinda together inform the progressive/liberal movement in America - good government reforms, the trend towards protection of rights of minorities and civil liberties, the capability of government to alleviate poverty and direct the rebuilding of society.
Conservatism, at least on the social side, is much as you say, though a majority of self-identified conservatives since the Nixon Era have been reactionary authoritarians who support the curtailing of freedom and the crushing of dissent.
There is a difference between a liberal and a leftists...liberals support liberty and free speech while leftists support censorship however the term liberal is often used interchangeable with progressive/leftist.
Modern conservatives are not about conserving the status quo as much as they are about conserving our countries foundational conservative values as life, liberty, free speech and limited government
True liberals and constitutional conservatives have a lot in common but with different approaches to various issues
America was founded on the principles of classical liberalism aka small government and the likes.
So some liberterians and conservatives will tend to advocate those ideals since those were the traditional values of America
One important thing is that the term "liberal" is used in a very different way outside the US discourse. For example being liberal here in Sweden means that you are center-right and not particularly pro big govermment.
Over in the UK, our main parties are blue and red coloured but they are the other way around.
+Olivier Goulet I never really understood that either.
+Trevor Greenawalt it's because traditionally the left has been red (since the birth of socialism, liberalism is basically a watered down version of socialism) and blue is for capitalism because it stands for free trade the world over (our world is mostly water, which is blue. And what do you do with large bodies of water? You traverse them to trade with the people on the other side!).
Mr Monkey Josh I meant I never understood the colors of the political parties in the us.
+Trevor Greenawalt Originally Republicans were social and liberal while Democrats were conservative. They made a final shift in the 30s (with exception of 60s). The colors representing each stuck because tradition and less confusion
It just kinda happened. Nobody knows why.
if it were 100 years ago I would be liberal but in the present in the world we live in I am conservative.
What about libertarian?
Brady Anderson yeah nothing wrong with a libertarian.
So a roundabout way of saying you're a racist, uneducated hick.
Misaka Mikoto woah that was a clear example of what an uneducated leftist looks like. Thank you! That was my first experience with one!
But... that would have made you pro-Jim Crow 100 years ago.
Finally, a video that doesn't slander any political views but rather states bland facts. Thanks.
I think that was the most fair look at the ideologies I’ve ever seen
This RUclips channel has taught me more stuff in a more interesting way then some of my teachers have.
Thank you Crash Course you guys are awesome.
Please everyone, we all know autocratic is the best choice in Civ
Order is much better.
Autocratic supersonic hypnotic funky fresh
Make me your Supreme Leader and you'll never regret it, Pinky-swear.
Kyle Smit well to be honest if we're talking about civ 5 brave new world autocracy is paradoxically the best ideology as it unlocks futurism enabling you to do timing pushes with your artist's, writer's and musician's guilds giving you 250 tourism for every great person making you rack up like 1500 tourism in a dozen turns if you do it right, helping out a lot for the influence victory, especially considering it's really really hard to win through hard culture and tourism in multiplayer especially. The statue of liberty from the freedom tree is dope though. It's like secularism but with production.
In Civ 4, I always stand by universal suffrage. After all, Pyramids + Universal Suffrage before its prereq tech + All the religions = Victory
I have so little knowledge on politics, this was super helpful!
6:46
They are the ones raising the children most the time other than the parents sooooo
Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman once said:"A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both." That's my view.
+BBBuilds12
Friedman killed the socialist in me.
+BBBuilds12 Yeah, that quote from a single Nobel laureate sure does trump all other views in existence. He is our one true god and his words are unchallengeable. /eyeroll
+Jachim Soyer I was simply stating a simple quote from an intelligent man to make an easy backup for my views. There is no need for sarcasm. I have plenty of other reasons for having the views that I do. I just figured people would ignore the comment if it was not brief, due to people's short attention spans these days.
I don't see it. Can you explain how this is true?
+TM04
Free trade.
If I'm free to make my life better, to pursue my own goals and dreams, then I will end up benefiting everyone around me.
A very simple example:
I plant Carrots and you plant potatoes.
Then I suggest we exchange. My carrots for your potatoes. Sounds fair?
It may seem like we exchanged 1 for 1. But actually, we both eat better.
Now I can focus on planting just Carrots. I become extremely good at it, and so do you with your potatoes, which we'll trade later. But there's only so much we can eat, there's extra production that comes from each of us being exceptional at our Trades, so... We can feed more people, have a bigger familly. All thanks to the human-exclusive ability that we call "trade". Screw opposable thumbs. What makes us really different from other animals is our ability to trade!
It's the Invisible Hand.
Andrew Carnegie didn't nearly gone bankrupt investing in a new process of making steel because he wanted to push Science forward. He just wanted to make money.
J.D. Rockefeller didn't push for the invention of Otto-cycle engines because he was concerned with the possible environmental impacts of oil refining waste products. He wanted to sell what was left after the Kerosene was refined. Gave it the name "gasoline".
Henry Ford did not invented the Model T to help his fellow man travel faster. He wanted to make money.
As for a society that puts equality before freedom, refer to the Soviet Union. Or if you'd like a recent case study, read about Venezuela.
Craig, I haven't commented on any of your videos yet, but I love your series. You've got a great presence and sense of humor. Keep up the awesome work!
You should have had a Libertarian clone that just flopped around on the desk, screamed "ROADS ARE THEFT" and then made out with the eagle.
More like the one most likely to just leave you alone. Also, most ideological libertarians are Republican (myself included), not Libertarian, so I'm not sure the capital L is representative of the average American libertarian. And believe it or not, most aren't fixated on the roads. "Who'll build the roads" is more of a liberal go-to question, a tired left-wing FAQ whenever libertarianism comes up. Liberals become obsessed with the roads for some reason whenever a smaller government or Ayn Rand are mentioned.
Wow! I was pleasantly surprised by how unbiased this video was! Great job!
The problem with saying that conservatives' core value is liberty is that liberty conflicts with their adherence to and enforcement of traditional values. I would say that libertarians are really the people who value liberty above all else, whereas conservatives are halfway between tradition and liberty.
+johnbtheperson
Of course libertarians do. Libertarians see through the narcissism of the left and incredulousness from the far right.
+johnbtheperson Don't confuse conservatism with the Republican Party.
+johnbtheperson You mean neocons?
Beautifully unbiased! But my belief is that both sides are full of shit.
Cris Mike Both Sides? Then what do you support? It's not a side, it's a belief. Free market, or not? It's one or the other, one a liberal one a conservative (excluding ranging degrees of centrists of course).
Kyle D you can be Independent
Cris Mike reading this comment really relieved me
This comment thread gives me hope
Cris Mike Go Fascist then.
One thing Europeans should know when watching American political videos. They don't use the political terms in the correct way, they have made their own versions for it. Liberal in the US means progressive left leaning politics, it don't actually have anything to do with liberalism at all.
I came here from CC astronomy. Very happy with the unbiased video, wasn't expecting it.
I'm a libertarian conservative.
and I'm a mexican.
Me too, I'm Native American. We have a healthy distrust of the federal government.... for reasons.
RollOnToVictory hail my brother.ive always held conservative veiws.and what's crazy is that I went to a school with liberal teachers but built on conservative ideals.kinda like america.
***** let me guess? Liberal.
annnd thats why you guys lost this election.
Very balanced video. I'm impressed.
I love educational content. Thank you for providing it for free!
i'm definitely craigist
I am a Republican, but I don't consider my self a Conservative, Neocon, Paleo, or Libertarian. I would call my self a Moderate.
Paisa Hero Unless you have your sights set on power through public office, why would you associate with a party?
So only if you are running for a political position, you should not have political view? so people who believed in Liberalism, Progressiveness, Conservatism, etc....
Paisa Hero Having a political view doesn't require associating with a political party if you have the ability to think for yourself.
KJ110813 I don't understand your reasoning, so the people of the us should not choose a party, because if you are a Progressive for example, it means that you would agree 100% with progressive candidates, and you won't be able to think for yourself? Look it's a free country, if people want to do something it does not impelled them to think critically, most active military personal oppose interaction policies, and yet war is the only reason why they are even around. Being part of something don't stop you from having a brain
Paisa Hero You said you're political standing is moderate, right? If that's indeed true, then it makes no sense to be a member of the Republican party as they're platform is extremely conservative.
You can't be moderate and support the GOP (or the Democrats).
I feel like an opportunity was missed to mention the di-axised political spectrum, since Libertarianism was mentioned, and the opposite side being Statism (however I am a bit biased as I'm a libertarian myself). Though, to be frank, not many people openly profess a statist viewpoint because it's been thrown around as a slur by many politicians of today, but there is a growing amount of support for libertarian candidates, like for example Ron Paul, and it would have been nice to at least see some recognition for that, but given that there have been two main viewpoints so far, it's forgiveable.
+Suitaloo But there's such a thing as libertarian statism, so it'd have to be defined in a way that is pretty much anarchy, if you want to compare libertarianism it to statism. Libertarian vs authoritarian, anarchy vs statism.
Somebody like Ron Paul is pretty libertarian but he still believes in a state.
+VIGILANTIA there is such thing as minarchy (minimal state, a nightwatchman state)
VIGILANTIA Libertarian statism honestly sounds like an oxymoron...
+Suitaloo I too felt a little disgruntled at the fact that no nuance was discussed on the spectrum and that liberal and conservative weren't really defined, but were heuristically shown to relate to other beliefs and statistical likelihoods. I would stand in the very liberal and moderately libertarian camp. (Very left, mostly bottom) There's not really any political party to address my viewpoints in America. Maybe the socialist party would have if I were alive 100 years ago.
lordzallen yeah minarchy a better word libertarian statist lel
Hey, the first "let's explain political ideology" video I've seen today without a propagandist bias.
BTW, to the people in the comments, this isn't about whether each group's views on what they are accomplishing match reality. It's about how each group views THEMSELVES.
I am _Craigslist_ thank you very much.
I identify as liberal however I also have many conservative ideals. I do support family, tradition, morals, even religion. I am against the form of conservatism which manifests as white american nationalism, war mongering and so forth. Those conservatives are an embarrassment. I do believe in multiculturalism and support negotiating peace with other nations, only relying on military force should there be a clear and imminent threat to this country. Stay out of conflicts which don't concern us. I believe that for a healthy society we need to embrace our home but also be prepared to reform it, should something not work properly.
Something interesting is where you draw the line between what global matters concern a particular country in our heavily globalised society.
nictheperson They are just my personal views..
What you hate is neocon! Neocon old days used to be internationalist liberal of Truman. Then the Neocon hijack republican into war monger party. Neocon are establish well in Republican. The reason why democrat is weak anti war party, because they used to home of neocon. Even Hillary herself is internationalist feminist
What if we want to help a country that’s in conflict with another country?(dumb question right?
White Knight 5
White nationalism is more alt-right than conservative.
I was a far left liberal socialist for years. It was the liberals who convinced me to become a Republican. How?
If I point to peer reviewed statistics by the Justice Department showing that blacks aren't being targeted by the police... I'm racist. If I mention that it is possible for a black person to be racist against a white person, I'm racist. If I question flawed studies promoted by the left and want to have an intelligent discussion on them, I'm racist. If I believe in racial equality, I'm racist. If I say I have black friends, clearly, I'm racist. If I'm white on a sunny day, I'm racist (and that last one's not made up either: www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/yes-all-white-people-are-racists-now-lets-do-something-about-it ).
What's worse, if you're trying to explain yourself or have a discussion with the left, then you're either "man'splaining" (if male) or have "internalized misogyny" (if female). Saying a woman is attractive is objectification, wishing a woman well is harassment,
holding a door open for them is sexism, telling them they're valuable is benign sexism, and the moment any of these stop, it’s due to "privilege".
What it means to be democrat or liberal is *NOT* the same thing as it was in JFK's time. These days it's about supporting minorities with a diaper pin (Yes, a literally diaper in - google it I'm not making that up). I'm a transgender lesbian atheist. I'm also a grown woman, and I *DO NOT* need your diaper pin, thank you very much.
There's a difference between theory and practice when it comes to political alignment, and that's what brought me over to the right.
The struggle. Well put.
^ The only people who have ever attacked me for my gender have been liberals. I'm an active, and well respected member, of the Republican party. I've never once been attacked for being transgender, and the few times that I was accidentally misgendered were followed by sincere apologies.
yeah, there is a very strong authoritarian left currently present - i like to think of them as McFeminists or McLiberals. they're the ones that call Bernie Sanders, a guy who himself calls himself a feminist, a sexist and racist. they hide behind their own hack idea of feminism and liberal and blindly call those that disagree with them as sexist or bigot - such as calling *all* trump voters sexist and racist without wanting to understand why they voted for him and not wanting to understand why hillary was such a flawed candidate.
i personally think of true liberals as stemming from New Deal ideas.
I agree with everything you've said, that still doesn't make me a republican
+Pumpkin Rot
I would encourage you to look more into what Republicans honestly stand for.
This is a quality video that i enjoyed very much and would recommend to any 2nd period government class taught by Mr. Carl
Respect + for accuracy and non bias. We need more of this.
Love this video and is perfectly open no unbiased
From the arguments presented in the video im a proud conservative
Germanisch Weiß me too
then ur dumb af
ItsZaza Ad Hominem smh
Ian Jones please provide any example.
proud liberal
I gotta say, I'm currently at uni, and this is saving me :) thanks :)
why am I watching this when I have a neuroscience exam tomorrow..
So basically "muh guns" or "muh privilege."
ConnorNT yep. A+
Muh Abortions. Muh Mexican friends. Muh privelage.
ConnorNT Muh weed muh feminism muh genderless language
Couldn't have described it better, well done
Nobody:
Literally nobody:
Liberal socialists: The clapping is triggering to my anxiety
This was a fantastically unbiased discussion. Very, very good work here. (conservative myself, we're used to being accused of all sorts of evil in these kinds of videos, thank you for doing your research and being honest).
+Aj Dembroski I agree. Although I think he may have been a tiny biased when he was explaining Liberal values. Although that could also be because I'm between Libertarian and Conservative myself.
This help me understand more of what I have to write about in class
"I swear to not look at the comment"
2 seconds later
Gosh darnit
it's just a bunch of centrists giving themselves virtual handjobs
1:53 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES usually support a strong defense. This is one place where we generally don't think spending should be cut.
2:11 This means that we don't like flag burning, and we favor prayer in schools because these reflect traditional religious and patriotic values.
2:21 Many conservatives, as strong adherents to religious faiths, are against abortion.
2:29 The social sphere is where we differ significantly from our libertarian friends who don't see any role for government in people's personal lives.
2:23 This means that libertarians often support things like marijuana legalization that more traditional conservatives do not support.
2:41 If there's one value that American conservatives privilege above others, it's LIBERTY...
Centrism is the best ideology to have. You aren't loyal to any party or area of the political spectrum, so you can decide on the policy that's best for you.
I couldn't agree more
Yeah
Lol no. Centrists are fanatically dedicated to centrism just like communists are fanatically dedicated to communism. It's not a 2 dimensional scale, there is no 'middle ground'.
Even if that was the case, the left and right, at least nowadays, are maniacal ideologies. Both sides of the political spectrum are plagued with racism and bias. Of course there are extreme centrists out there, but I haven't seen any evidence that they are the majority.
I agree with independence from parties. Not independence from ideology. Centrism IS an ideology.
I was a classic left-leaning college student. Then I got hurt and spent 2 years recovering. When I returned, it was like almost everyone had a new set of values: Feminism wasn’t about having the same opportunities, it was about having perfectly half and half genders in every profession-bonus points for transgender people.
I was in favor of free speech and a proportional tax system. But when I returned, people wanted “hate speech” restricted, and “hate speech” includes anything you disagree with. So speech isn’t free. And proportional taxes were actually insufficient, and the wealthy need more taxes than that.
What happened? I used to be left-leaning, but now I’m right of center! I didn’t change my beliefs, I don’t think!
Abby C - the social psychologist, Jonathan Haidt, does a good job articulating the leftward shift of societies over time. You might wanna RUclips him.
IMO the so-called progressives are deluded and misguided. You describe their commitment to equality of outcome superseding equality of opportunity. You also refer to third-wave feminism. These facets of the modern leftist ideology are in actuality quite regressive and detrimental to western society. It’s like we’ve learned nothing from the past and are doomed to repeat this endless cycle of human evolution and destruction over and over.
Egg Shen thanks!! I appreciate it, I’ll look him up!
Better to say Leftist than liberal. A true classical liberal believes in the Rule of Law, Free Markets, and Individual Freedom.
I respect my mother and father and have a close relationship with both, however, our political ideals are basically the opposite.
Why can't we all just get along??
Lol no
@Joseph Peterson truth
This video was meant to inform you about the two political parties and their views, not to start a fight
Because things don’t work that way
Is that Rodney King?
It sucks how these two pre-packaged worldviews are the only two options we're allowed to have.
Informative and not super biased, which is refreshing in a plicical video
My family is liberal, but I'm conservative.
reivven Good
then ur dumb af
relax
Ian Jones you probably listen to crowder hahaha you dumbass
reivven I'm the other way around. My parents are super super conservative, whereas I am liberal.
Conservatives want freedom and liberals want equality. I once spoke with a homeless man who told me, "Equality is freedom," and that has stuck with me ever since.
How fascinating and very educational to know more of which party I belong to. Watching this video also brings a sense of nostalgia of PBS shows (not to mention SCHOOLHOUSE ROCK) I’ve watched growing up in the 80’s and 90’s like: READING RAINBOW, NOVA, WISHBONE and SQUARE ONE. MERRY CHRISTMAS!!
That was pretty helpful and unbiased, thanks. I was searching for a broader comparison of political ideologies and terms, where they came from, and perhaps how the words have been morphed into what they mean today in American politics (as explained well in this video). For example, people generally refer to “libertarian” as the specific thing the libertarian party supports, which is actually right -libertarianism, however there is also left-libertarianism which is kind of a more radical version of democratic socialism. Unfortunately, most videos are geared towards conservative/republican vs liberal/democrat however in the US today these are two positions that are not far away from each other on a grid (not a line) that’s extends very far in every direction. Both Democrats and Republicans (in practice) fall into the right-authoritarian quadrant, there is pretty much no representation of left, or libertarian, values in our government, even though much of the country would support these ideas. This is why our voter turnout is so low and everyone has lost faith in the current two party system.
Libertarians have just about as much in common with Liberals as they do with Conservatives.
+Benjamin Bartholomew and it also depends on what bloody branch of libertarian you are.... strictly by taxonomy of ideas they would have Marxist in their ranks
“Jewish people are amongst the most liberal Americans”
* Ben Shapiro has entered the chat *
Sexist racist Bigot why are you like this, frogman?
@@harpsarp66 if you look at his playlists, its a very interesting mix of half naked girls dancing and PragerU vids. Classy
Tyson Chauncey Donald Nelson yikes
Nice job, very informative.
Explained in a simple way!!! Thanks
Oh thank god this video is pretty unbiased. The comments would be even worse than they usually are.
As a non-American, this is very interesting. Cause my country's political situation is super different with this
Dude you rock! Great job.
I feel so educated! Good job PBS 👍👍