JS Bach - Original Handwritten Scores - Goldberg Variations (by Glenn Gould 1955)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- Goldberg Variations, an audio recording conducted by Glenn Gould with the original handwritten scores of J.S. Bach.
Download full album here : itunes.apple.c....
Find the original scores digitized on Gallica : bit.ly/1qylwKV
Subscribe here bit.ly/188ZGkd to discover the new videos of the collection and all the music genre and spoken words recorded and released from 1900 to 1963
Ahh.. my favorite singer. He does play reasonable piano too.
+Peter Nierop hehe :D
Rofl. Good work :-)
You can hear Gould's influence everywhere. There's Keith Jarrett, for one, and at least one person on every city bus.
Lemao
Yes. The best singer! 🥰 Adore him.
The fluidity at such blistering tempos is mesmerizing! Also the notes with the stems on the opposite side really throws me off when reading along...
theyre to indicate the other melodies
Grazie. RIP Maestri Goud, Bach.
This is what we call a "Reinschrift" and not JSB's beautiful wave-like handwriting. Easily recognisable even to bloody amateurs like me.
I always found this signed as a manuscript this is really strange cause I saw always ondulating and more gentle calligraphy from Bach's handwriting
As far as I am aware, Bach's autograph is missing. However, it is quite interesting to note that the score shown here is Bach's personal copy of the printed edition, which contains many corrections in his hand (faded red ink). One of many examples is the "al tempo di Giga" marking on Var. 7 which was not in any printed edition of the piece until this copy was discovered in the 1970s. (After the last page of the print comes a single page autograph containing all 14 canons of BWV 1087 - this is actually the main bulk of the discovery.)
@@pizzacheeto Interesting - thanks, I wondered why this didn't look like the other Bach MSs I'd seen. Any idea why the B section is missing from Variation 25? 30:00
@@lettersquash Must have been a video editing mistake. They digitally stitched all the pages so that it appears as if the score scrolls continuously. The bar after the A section of Var.25 in the video is a stray bar from Var.26 which is played at 30:39. The recording and edition both have the B section.
this version of the variations is so amazing. I didn't think it could get any better with a quicker tempo but it has.
The works of J.S. Bach answer ALL QUESTONS- - M
42
Thanks for uploading this, and I look forward to seeing more GG Bach with scrolling scores.
진짜 글렌 굴드는 왜이리 맛깔나게 치냐.... 넘사벽이다 이게 장인의 손맛인가
Much needed ❤️❤️
Beautifully presented video and audio, although not Bach's handwriting as stated by the title. Also feel the gaps between variations are slightly too long. Love the IDEA of hearing it to Bach's handwriting - will look around for that!
Fun fact: the Goldberg Variations were the only work of Bach printed in his lifetime.
영상팀
원종락:영상팀장
손인수:기자
최재훈:기자
임유주:기자
Olden days composers used to write cursive writings
Merci pour cet upload. :-)
Great video! I am fascinated by the roll effect of the sheet. Maybe you could tell me how you did it?
I dont believe that Bach was a human being
+Simon Mergner nobody better after your answer !!! he was just..... "illuminato" in the real meaning !
Bach is The Trinity of Music.
because he is God
Neither was Gould :)
Nice video
Anybody know, why is only the A section of Variation 25 there? I gather this is a copy Bach made from a printed version. Was it in the printed version? See from 30:00 - both of the section A codas are there, and then another bar on its own on the next line, but that's not the start of section B either. 🤔
ruclips.net/video/jWshUm0Juxk/видео.htmlm55s
pretty talented caligrapher
écouter et suivre sur la partition j'aime.
oui
there is no Bach's handwritten score of Goldberg Variations. There is the print of 1741.
성함:김학균
과목:사회문화
직위:3학년부장
학급:3-3반
성함:방현주
과목:한국지리
학급:3-4반
성함:정지윤
과목:법과정치
학급:2-3반
성함:박선혜
과목:영어
학급:2-4반
Респект!
Si tratta,credo della prima pubblicazione a stampa e non del manoscritto che a quanto so, è andato perduto
***** Questo è vero. Questa prima edizione è stata pubblicata parecchi errori corretti di Bach più tardi.
Variation 4
This might be a dumb question, but is there any reason why the notes are written the other way round for some bits?
theyre to indicate the other melodies and sometimes which hand plays them
simply to make everything fit on the systems without interference.
simply to make everything fit on the systems without interference.
That's if the direction of the stem is flipped. However, Bach wrote every stem to the right of the note - even for notes with stems facing down.
Great quastion ! That was my quastion! I cannot find the answer!!
The long pauses between variations is rather disconcerting. I don't think this was in the original recording so the poster, though we are grateful for the post and the work, must have added those pauses for some reason we do not know?
These are studio outtakes from the 1955 recording.
Why are the stems backward and inverted some times ?!??
fuckin sick!
I think it is a published score. There isn't any handwritten score of the Goldberg Variations by J.S.Bach.
Yeah it was lost. If we found it, then we can say "original version", sadly no
Notice the alto clefs
Pourquoi avoir supprimé la 2ème partie de la 25ème variation ?
C'est trop beau 😜
it looks as handwriting because of the type of the printing - etching
성함:권은총
과목:생물
학급:2-1반
성함:서숙희
과목:윤리
학급:2-2반
The title of this is sadly wrong. This is NOT the handwriting of JS Bach. These are images of the first published score. They were engraved on copper plates, then printed. Please fix this - it's not right, and people are misled.
Come te non c'è nessuno!
¡¡ 2~GENious~2 !!
These? Are the originals? By Bach? Bach was very neat!
+EASYTIGER10 no originals actually
+EASYTIGER10 I think that these were not written by himself but by his students.
+uztre6789 Possibly by his wife.
It's not a manuscript but an engraving.
It was his dog.
what are the symbols above the first two notes of the left hand's first bars of the aria? I assume not a mordent but I can't recognize it from any other symbol i know?
I think these are rests
Quarter rests for the other voice in the LH
!!!!!!!!!!!!
oH!
c'est vraiment la partition écrit de la main de bach lui même ??
¡¡ 2~ΕυΓενιους~2 !!
Greek ???
Έλληνας εδώ ??? ...παράξενο
This is communication from God, written by the hand of man. Bach thought so. So do I.
is this really handwritten of Js Bach himself? mhhh hard to believe it looks too clean ...
No
Dr.Hannibal Lechter brought me here.
danny4481 The good doctor is somewhere locked up listening to this with a smile on his face thinking of Clarice and how she's doing. thats if Dr Chilton hadnt taken his privileges away again.
Ha,ha! I believe the good Dr was having Chilton "for dinner" on the island of Bimini.
성함:박종철
과목:국어
학급:3-1반
성함:이현지
과목:영어
학급:3-2반
사회팀
차장:추종탁
차장:김성기
차장:김동환
차장:윤혜림
차장:김민욱
I like it, but it seems 8th variation is played in 6/8 rather than 3/4. I tried to hear 3/4, but could not.
+Rammetallist 3/4 = 6/8
+Nal No. This is music, not math.
3/4 is simple time signature.
6/8 is compound time signature.
They have different structures.
If you don't know, then do not write nonsense.
Best regards from Russia.
Rammetallist
There really isn't much of a difference between Music and Math.
Regardless, you can put six eighth notes into one measure with signature 3/4 as well as the converse.
Any _convention_ beyond that is just that, an arbitrary convention. One that is so arbitrary that it has no impact on the listener either, unless you precisely fix every possible variable for every instrument in your notation that is.
+Nal
Actually, the time signature has very strong impact on the listener. You'll never confuse the minuet (3/4) and Barcarolle (6/8), if you know something about the structure of the measure in these genres.
Once again I draw your attention on the structure. Of course, in 3/4 measure contains 6 eighths, but they sound like: | Da-ta-Ta-ta-Ta-ta | Da-ta-Ta-ta-Ta-ta |.
And it is quite another 6/8: | Da-ta-ta-Ta-ta-ta | Da-ta-ta-Ta-ta-ta |.
I do not know how else to explain it. Please read Wikipedia at least, article "Time signature".
P.S. Sorry for my bad English. I'm just learning.
Rammetallist
Your English is fine.
I'm aware of the notion, but the accents (structure) are just a convention. You don't have to put your accents like that to write in 3/4 or 6/8. You could even choose entirely different accents and still notate in 3/4 or 6/8.
Not Bach's handwriting
this is handwritten, but not by Bach
대구예술대학교서양화과
조융일:교수.학과장
최기득:교수
박정선:교수
Non è la calligrafia di Bach!
Not handwritten but printed
This is an excellent performance. But I compared it variation-by-variation with the version by Murray Perahia and and I find the latter so much superior. Not less brilliant than Gould, Perahia's playing has so much more musicality while maintaining expressiveness to a minimum like Gould does. It must be listened to appreciate.
Later recording by Gould shows expressiveness.
1981 i guess.
Murray Perahia has a high appeal for the untrained ear. He layers on the odd excessive trill here and there by keeping tempo down in order to add his own random flourishes, and makes little attempt to bring clarity to the separate voices in the piece, such as Glenn was able to do with his unique mental gift, with which he popularized many of Bach's works that were previously unknown to the wider public. Murray is your run-of-the-mill music critic claptrap that keeps his finger to the air for what to play next in his programs and is a shameless self-promoter. Not surprisingly, he avoids crediting Glenn with anything whatsoever when it comes to anything Bach related by side-stepping and dodging interview questions might lead to a conversation about his thoughts regarding Glenn - with Murray, the spotlight is only big enough for one person, period - and that's Murray.
Too fast
It's Gould!